Riku Voipio wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:12:30PM +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
You are right. In the future, we might think of eliminating the
architectures that are clearly wrong from the selection.
For the toolchain you're using, qemu-arm-0.8.1-sb2 might be the one
you're looking for.
Thanks.
But what's the basis for that choice. Where can I learn what these are? For instance, what
does "sb2" mean, and why is it better for me than the other ones?
arm = little endian arm
armeb = big endian arm
Generally the bigger the qemu version, the better. However, all
versions qemu are buggy in different ways, so you might actually want
to downgrade to older version if hitting problems.
If you are working on maemo, please refer to their documentation
for selecting preferred qemu version.
sb2 means nothing usefull and will be removed in future
Hi all.
Last week I downloaded the last stable version of Scratchbox (1.0.7) and I tried
to compile for a big-endian arm support.
Surprisingly, I saw that the Qemu big-endian support is still buggy.
Then, my question: did you integrate the patch that we proposed several weeks
ago ? (see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2006-09/msg00137.html)
In fact, our patched Qemu works fine, whereas Scratchbox Qemu still seems not
working...
Regards,
Claudio
--
=================================
Claudio Scordino
Software Engineer
Evidence Srl
Embedded Real-Time solutions
http://www.evidence.eu.com
=================================
_______________________________________________
Scratchbox-users mailing list
Scratchbox-users@lists.scratchbox.org
http://lists.scratchbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scratchbox-users
