[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Region Codec matrix really needed

2013-06-05 Thread ccie2k12
Hi,

If the question ask calls in same region should use g711

and calls in different regions use g729

 

Do we really have to define region wise codecs in region setup page or just
creating the region is enough ?

because if we have 

InterAregion Codec = g711/g722

and 

interEregion Codec = g279 

in service parameter then we would not have a need to set these again in
region setup page

right??

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Region Codec matrix really needed

2013-06-05 Thread Josh Petro
You are correct. However, I have found its a short config process to setup
the region codec as it should be per the question simply for piece of mind
and to rule out any potential bugs in the software.
Josh
On Jun 5, 2013 5:52 AM, ccie2k12 ccie2...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi,

 If the question ask calls in same region should use g711

 and calls in different regions use g729

 ** **

 Do we really have to define region wise codecs in region setup page or
 just creating the region is enough ?

 because if we have 

 InterAregion Codec = g711/g722

 and 

 interEregion Codec = g279 

 in service parameter then we would not have a need to set these again in
 region setup page

 right??

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE NTP - Best practices

2013-06-05 Thread sanity insanity
hi Guys,

Still waiting for a reply.

Please assist.

-MJ

On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:34 AM, sanity insanity 
networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello All,

 I have the following questions


 1) which is the best way to bind the service module to the router is it
 requried to bind it to the loopback of the router or  the interface voice
 vlan?  Also is there any other routing related problems that we need to
 take account before doing this?


 2) On my HQ router I am configuring  it to sync with a back NTP server. I
 am also required to sync
 the CUCM publisher with the loopback of this HQ router . Here are my
 questions...

 a) I have the following configuration on the HQ router...
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp server 177.26.1.100

 Is any other command required ?  or the above is enough ?


 3)  On CUCM PUB  I have added the NTP server  and given it the ip address
 of loopback of HQ router. Now my questions are...

 1) Is a reboot of CUCM required?
 2) If the ntp does not sync will my DB replication break after a few hours?



 -MJ

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE NTP - Best practices

2013-06-05 Thread Barrera, Hugo
Be prepared for it to break, I just restart ntp on both pub and sub this 
typically fixes it. 

Regards,
Hugo

On Jun 4, 2013, at 6:55 PM, sanity insanity 
networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello All,
 
 I have the following questions
 
 
 1) which is the best way to bind the service module to the router is it 
 requried to bind it to the loopback of the router or  the interface voice 
 vlan?  Also is there any other routing related problems that we need to take 
 account before doing this?
 
 
 2) On my HQ router I am configuring  it to sync with a back NTP server. I am 
 also required to sync
 the CUCM publisher with the loopback of this HQ router . Here are my 
 questions...
 
 a) I have the following configuration on the HQ router...
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp server 177.26.1.100
 
 Is any other command required ?  or the above is enough ?
 
 
 3)  On CUCM PUB  I have added the NTP server  and given it the ip address of 
 loopback of HQ router. Now my questions are...
 
 1) Is a reboot of CUCM required?
 2) If the ntp does not sync will my DB replication break after a few hours?
 
 
 
 -MJ
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab strategy

2013-06-05 Thread singh
hi Everyone,I need your inputshere. I have been trying to complete mock and 
practice labs in 8 hours . However their I am unable to finishor I finish with 
lab with a lot of mistakes with no time for testing.I also realize that I lose 
thing in the first half and speed up during the end . Generally I take...1) 10 
mins to test if all equipment is working fine( 10 mins)2) read theworkbook 
questions for the next 15 mins3) Make note of the ip addresses and router 
configurationper site in25 mins4) Make note of all cucm configuration , cups , 
unity connection , uccx and cue for another  dial plan20 mins5) Now from point 
5  I start with lab configurations fromBranch 2( site c which is a mgcp gateway 
and srstsetup)this generally takes me about1 and a half hour to just complete 
allconfiguration ( 1 hour and 30 mins)6) Then I move to Branch 1 ( site B  
which is a H323 gateway with srst)this generally takes about45  50 mins7) I 
then move to HQ ( R1  which is MGCP gateway with srst )this 
 generally takes20 mins .8) Basic setup of DP , css, aar, NTP , service 
parameters and enterprise para, vlans , dhcpand ip phone registration takes 50 
mins9) CUC integ and other configincluding recording takes20mins10 ) CUE 
integration and trafer setuptakes 20 mins11) UCCX integration , One button , 
script and recording takes40 mins12) CUPs integration and client setup takes20 
mins13 )I then come back to callmanger and do the media resource setup , 
gateways added cucm , other configuration such as MVA , RSVP , + dial , adding 
trunks , unassigned dn setupto CUC this takes50 mins14 ) Then I move to the 
Route pattern setup on callmanger this I do for 3 sites  HQ , Site B and Site 
Cwith or without redundancy on callmanger this takes 25 mins15 ) Thendo this 
such as RTMT log collection and indicating information in seperate files , MGCP 
debugsthis takes another 15 mins16 ) Switch and WAN QOS this I plan to doonly 
if time permits as this is a complex sectionQuestions :==
 =1) I barely am able to finish things in time . I have heard from on 
this forum thatthere arecandidates who finish it is 5 6 hours . Would anyone be 
able to share with me as to how they do this ?2) Even if the above I complete 
exercises are complete there are sections where I miss out on configurations. 
How do I make sure all config for all sections is done correctly?3) I really 
wish I am able to finish the lab in 6 hours so that I can test for another 2 
hours . Could someone therefore check the above 16 points and let me know about 
the time I can reduce.4) As you can see above the router configurations consume 
a bit more time making ( points 5 , 6 , 7 ) . I have tried with both using a 
notepad to type the configurations and then paste  also with typing on cli but 
both these methods takearound the same time. Please let me know what best 
method I canuse for points 5 , 6 , 7.5) Other suggestions are most welcome 
.Thanks guys in advance for all your help!Regards,SinghG
 et Yourself a cool, short @in.com Email ID now!
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab strategy

2013-06-05 Thread Martin Sloan
Let me say, I've never sat the lab so I'm just commenting on my own study
experience.

 - Points 3  4 are probably consuming too much time.  Documenting IP's is
good but I don't currently go through and check configs.  I figure i'll get
to it when it's time to configure that piece and if there are issues I'll
do my troubleshooting then.
 - 1.5hrs for Br2 seems like a long time.  I think you can get quicker with
that part and do it in 45min or less, depending on the complexity.

Just with those savings you're getting closer to your 6 hour goal.  I use
notepad for anything that can be repeated like dial-peers, translation
rules/patterns, dspfarm, QoS, etc.  I think its MUCH faster than manually
typing the configs each time.  I always configure BR1 first so most of the
time I'm just tweaking some settings and pasting into BR2.

Just my input based on my own studies.  I'm sure there are veterans out
there who have a better insight into saving time.  I'm interested to hear
their take as well.

Marty


On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:58 AM, singh singh8...@in.com wrote:


 hi Everyone,

 I need your inputs here. I have been trying to complete mock and practice
 labs in 8 hours . However their I am unable to finish or I finish with lab
 with a lot of mistakes with no time for testing.

 I also realize that I lose thing in the first half and speed up during the
 end . Generally I take...

 1) 10 mins to test if all equipment is working fine ( 10 mins)
 2) read the workbook questions for the next 15 mins
 3) Make note of the ip addresses and router configuration per site in 25
 mins
 4) Make note of all cucm configuration , cups , unity connection , uccx
 and cue for another  dial plan 20 mins
 5) Now from point 5 - I start with lab configurations from Branch 2 ( site
 c - which is a mgcp gateway and srst setup) this generally takes me about 1
 and a half hour to just complete all configuration ( 1 hour and 30 mins)
 6) Then I move to Branch 1 ( site B - which is a H323 gateway with srst)
 this ge nerally takes about 45 - 50 mins
 7) I then move to HQ ( R1 - which is MGCP gateway with srst ) this
 generally takes 20 mins .
 8) Basic setup of DP , css, aar, NTP , service parameters and enterprise
 para , vlans , dhcp and ip phone registration takes 50 mins
 9) CUC integ and other config including recording takes 20 mins
 10 ) CUE integration and trafer setup takes 20 mins
 11) UCCX integration , One button , script and recording takes 40 mins
 12) CUPs integration and client setup takes 20 mins
 13 )I then come back to callmanger and do the media resource setup ,
 gateways added cucm , other configuration such as MVA , RSVP , + dial ,
 adding trunks , unassigned dn setup to CUC - this takes 50 mins
 14 ) Then I move to the Route pattern setup on callmanger this I do for 3
 sites - HQ , Site B and Site C with or without redundancy on callmanger
 this takes 25 mins
 15 ) Then do this such as RTMT log collection and indicating informa tion
 in seperate files , MGCP debugs this takes another 15 mins
 16 ) Switch and WAN QOS this I plan to do only if time permits as this is
 a complex section


 Questions :
 ===

 1) I barely am able to finish things in time . I have heard from on this
 forum that there are candidates who finish it is 5 - 6 hours . Would anyone
 be able to share with me as to how they do this ?

 2) Even if the above I complete exercises are complete there are sections
 where I miss out on configurations. How do I make sure all config for all
 sections is done correctly?

 3) I really wish I am able to finish the lab in 6 hours so that I can test
 for another 2 hours . Could someone therefore check the above 16 points and
 let me know about the time I can reduce.

 4) As you can see above the router configurations consume a bit more time
 making ( points 5 , 6 , 7 ) . I have tried with both using a notepad to
 type the configurations and then paste  also with typing on cli but both
 these methods take
 around the same time. Please let me know what best method I can use for
 points 5 , 6 , 7.


 5) Other suggestions are most welcome .



 Thanks guys in advance for all your help!

 Regards,
 Singh




 Get Yourself a cool, short *@in.com* Email ID 
 now!http://www3.in.com/sso/commonregister.php?ref=INutm_source=inviteutm_medium=outgoing

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE NTP - Best practices

2013-06-05 Thread Michael.Sears
 1) which is the best way to bind the service module to the router is 
 it required to bind it to the loopback of the router or  the interface 
 voice VLAN.

Answer:  It depends on the question it could be either the Loopback or the 
Voice VLAN it should say in the LAB.  In my practice I use both alternating, 
one lab I'll use the Voice VLAN and then on another run through the lab 
I'll use the Loopback.

Note that people have had issues using the Loopback so best to figure it out
before setting the LAB.

 2) On my HQ router I am configuring  it to sync with a back NTP 
 server. I am also required to sync the CUCM publisher with the 
 loopback of this HQ router . Here are my questions...

 a) I have the following configuration on the HQ router...
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp server 177.26.1.100

HQ ntp configuration:
ntp source Loopback0
ntp server 177.26.1.100 burst iburst

 3)  On CUCM PUB  I have added the NTP server  and given it the ip 
 address of loopback of HQ router. Now my questions are...

 1) Is a reboot of CUCM required?  No
 2) If the ntp does not sync will my DB replication break after a few hours?

Answer:  If the NTP Server does not synchronize need to determine why.  When 
I've had issues in the past with NTP not synchronizing it did not break 
dbreplication over a period of hours.  Although I suppose there's that 
possibility.


Michael Sears, CCIE(V)#38404


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaberation

2013-06-05 Thread khaled Saholy
Hi friends,

Any news on our subject!!

Regards.

khaled

From: hugo.barr...@nexusis.com
To: whl...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 15:12:43 +
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaberation






Well spoken Bill 100% agree. 



Regards,
Hugo



On Jun 3, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote:









Right you can continue to pass written exams and prove you are current with 
technology.  But what will you do when you apply for a job that requires or 
desires CCIE Collaboration?  CCIE voice will join the CCIE's of the pass that 
were retired, you will still
 be a CCIE but you will be considered less important because your CCIE is on 
outdated technology, like CCIE ISP Dial or CCIE SNA/IP integration do you see 
anyone asking for them now?





So I would prefer to have a grandfather or upgrade path instead of having to 
take the CCIE Collaboration exam





For those that say why not just get dual CCIE with CCIE Collaboration as it 
should be easy, name the people who say their CCIE was easy and would gladly 
pay 1500 more to take it again just to renew their current CCIE.





No if I want to get a dual CCIE, I want to earn it in another track, not 
another voice or communications centric track



Bill







On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Leslie Meade 
leslie.me...@lvs1.com wrote:




Wonder what this means….
 
http://ciscocert.force.com/english/articles/Article/CCIE-Collaboration-Certification-CCIE-Voice-can-be-recertified-EN?retURL=%2Fenglish%2Fapex%2Finstantanswers%3FproductCategory%3DCCIE_collaborationpopup=false
 
 
The CCIE Collaboration certification does not directly affect current CCIE 
Voice certification holders. Current CCIE Voice holders will be able to 
recertify
 by passing any CCIE exam including the new CCIE Collaboration written or lab 
exams.  

 

The CCIE Collaboration certification provides new career opportunities for CCIE 
Voice certification holders
 
 




Leslie Meade 


image001.jpg




Bach Information Technology

CCNA CCVP  CCIE Voice 38727

Network Consultant




..


Mobile:778.228.4339 |
Main: 604.676.5239

Email:
leslie.me...@lvs1.com



image002.jpg image003.jpg image004.jpg image005.jpg 
image006.jpgimage007.gif

www.longviewsystems.com


This message and any attached documents are only for the use of


the intended recipient(s), are confidential and may contain privileged 

information. Any unauthorized review, use, retransmission, or other 

disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in 

error, notify the sender immediately, and delete the original message.
 
 




___

For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com



Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com









___

For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com



Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com




___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition path from CCIE Voice to CCIE Collaboration

2013-06-05 Thread Daniel Pagan
Folks:

I'm sure many of you are already aware of this news, but one of the heads of 
Collaboration @ Cisco (I believe Rowan) has made a brief statement today 
saying, we will do the right thing for everyone. There's also some rumors 
floating around the Cisco Partner collaboration forums that a manager of the 
Cisco UC Master program confirmed CCIE Voice will be grandfathered into the 
CCIE Collab track. I don't believe this is confirmed so please don't hold me to 
it, but feel free to visit the threads for updated information.

Lastly, a community moderator confirmed that Cisco is reviewing all the 
concerns being posted.

https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/56611?start=45tstart=0

https://communities.cisco.com/thread/35337?tstart=0

Honestly, it's really great to see how everyone came together, spoke loudly, 
and made a difference. Even if the decision isn't reversed, the past few days 
really demonstrated how dedicated and passionate everyone is to their field and 
hard-earned certifications.

I'm beginning to see a light at the end of the tunnel.

Daniel Pagan, CCIE # 25689

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
michael.se...@compucom.com
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 1:03 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition path from 
CCIE Voice to CCIE Collaboration
Importance: High

If you haven't already done so please sign this petition: http://chn.ge/17A0zXE

Michael Sears, CCIE(V)#38404
Designing and Implementing Cisco Unified Communications on Unified Computing 
Systems


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition path from CCIE Voice to CCIE Collaboration

2013-06-05 Thread William Bell
Daniel,

First, let me touch on the most important point you have brought up:

 Honestly, it's really great to see how everyone came together, spoke loudly, 
 and made a difference. Even if the decision isn't reversed, the past few days 
 really demonstrated how dedicated and passionate everyone is to their field 
 and hard-earned certifications.

Absolutely outstanding! Everyone has done a great job of keeping this topic on 
Cisco's radar. Keep it up!

Second, I am at the PBT in SJC. Rowan mentioned the CCIE but it was just an 
acknowledgement that our message has been received. The right thing comment 
was actually made by another person (name escapes me). Rowan may have echoed 
the sentiment but no guarantees/promises were made. This isn't bad news. All 
feedback we have received thus far has been a positive trend in the right 
direction. Even if it has been incremental.

So, there is a light at the end of the tunnel. Cisco will want to close this 
down as fast as possible. Whatever the answer is, we can all be satisfied that 
we refused to roll over on this. Again, the volume of support within the 
community is quite impressive. Don't back off the throttle now. Keep pushing, 
stay on message, and (as always) be polite.


-Bill

--
William Bell, CCIE #38914
blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
Follow me on twitter @ucguerrilla




On Jun 5, 2013, at 2:14 PM, Daniel Pagan dpa...@fidelus.com wrote:

 Folks:
 
 I'm sure many of you are already aware of this news, but one of the heads of 
 Collaboration @ Cisco (I believe Rowan) has made a brief statement today 
 saying, we will do the right thing for everyone. There's also some rumors 
 floating around the Cisco Partner collaboration forums that a manager of the 
 Cisco UC Master program confirmed CCIE Voice will be grandfathered into the 
 CCIE Collab track. I don't believe this is confirmed so please don't hold me 
 to it, but feel free to visit the threads for updated information.
 
 Lastly, a community moderator confirmed that Cisco is reviewing all the 
 concerns being posted.
 
 https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/56611?start=45tstart=0
 
 https://communities.cisco.com/thread/35337?tstart=0
 
 Honestly, it's really great to see how everyone came together, spoke loudly, 
 and made a difference. Even if the decision isn't reversed, the past few days 
 really demonstrated how dedicated and passionate everyone is to their field 
 and hard-earned certifications.
 
 I'm beginning to see a light at the end of the tunnel.
 
 Daniel Pagan, CCIE # 25689
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
 michael.se...@compucom.com
 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 1:03 PM
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition path from 
 CCIE Voice to CCIE Collaboration
 Importance: High
 
 If you haven't already done so please sign this petition: 
 http://chn.ge/17A0zXE
 
 Michael Sears, CCIE(V)#38404
 Designing and Implementing Cisco Unified Communications on Unified Computing 
 Systems
 
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition path from CCIE Voice to CCIE Collaboration

2013-06-05 Thread Michael Miller
This post was made on the Learning @ Cisco Facebook page:

To all of our CCIE Voice professionals. Here is a statement from Fred
Weiller, Director of Marketing at Learning@Cisco:
We are listening to the feedback from our valued CCIE community, and will
be adjusting the CCIE Collaboration requirements. As a quick preview of the
evolution of the CCIE Collaboration certification, a current holder of the
CCIE Voice designation will now be able to migrate to a CCIE Collaboration
credential by taking the CCIE Collaboration written exam only. We
appreciate all of the great feedback and patience of the community while we
update our webpages to reflect this change. We will be communicating
further details about this modification as soon as possible.
It seems the request for a migration path via written exam will be the way
forward.

Thanks,

Mike

On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:40 PM, William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com wrote:

 Daniel,

 First, let me touch on the most important point you have brought up:

 Honestly, it's really great to see how everyone came together, spoke
 loudly, and made a difference. Even if the decision isn't reversed, the
 past few days really demonstrated how dedicated and passionate everyone is
 to their field and hard-earned certifications.


 Absolutely outstanding! Everyone has done a great job of keeping this
 topic on Cisco's radar. Keep it up!

 Second, I am at the PBT in SJC. Rowan mentioned the CCIE but it was just
 an acknowledgement that our message has been received. The right thing
 comment was actually made by another person (name escapes me). Rowan may
 have echoed the sentiment but no guarantees/promises were made. This isn't
 bad news. All feedback we have received thus far has been a positive trend
 in the right direction. Even if it has been incremental.

 So, there is a light at the end of the tunnel. Cisco will want to close
 this down as fast as possible. Whatever the answer is, we can all be
 satisfied that we refused to roll over on this. Again, the volume of
 support within the community is quite impressive. Don't back off the
 throttle now. Keep pushing, stay on message, and (as always) be polite.


 -Bill

 --
 William Bell, CCIE #38914
 blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
 Follow me on twitter @ucguerrilla




 On Jun 5, 2013, at 2:14 PM, Daniel Pagan dpa...@fidelus.com wrote:

 Folks:

 I'm sure many of you are already aware of this news, but one of the heads
 of Collaboration @ Cisco (I believe Rowan) has made a brief statement today
 saying, we will do the right thing for everyone. There's also some rumors
 floating around the Cisco Partner collaboration forums that a manager of
 the Cisco UC Master program confirmed CCIE Voice will be grandfathered into
 the CCIE Collab track. I don't believe this is confirmed so please don't
 hold me to it, but feel free to visit the threads for updated information.

 Lastly, a community moderator confirmed that Cisco is reviewing all the
 concerns being posted.

 https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/56611?start=45tstart=0

 https://communities.cisco.com/thread/35337?tstart=0

 Honestly, it's really great to see how everyone came together, spoke
 loudly, and made a difference. Even if the decision isn't reversed, the
 past few days really demonstrated how dedicated and passionate everyone is
 to their field and hard-earned certifications.

 I'm beginning to see a light at the end of the tunnel.

 Daniel Pagan, CCIE # 25689

 -Original Message-
 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
 ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
 michael.se...@compucom.com
 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 1:03 PM
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition path
 from CCIE Voice to CCIE Collaboration
 Importance: High

 If you haven't already done so please sign this petition:
 http://chn.ge/17A0zXE

 Michael Sears, CCIE(V)#38404
 Designing and Implementing Cisco Unified Communications on Unified
 Computing Systems


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition path from CCIE Voice to CCIE Collaboration

2013-06-05 Thread William Bell
FYI. The CCIE WINS its voice back!

http://bit.ly/11ise6g

Great job to everyone on this list for getting together and pushing for change. 
Daniel said it best!

-Bil

--
William Bell, CCIE #38914
blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
Follow me on twitter @ucguerrilla




On Jun 5, 2013, at 2:14 PM, Daniel Pagan dpa...@fidelus.com wrote:

 Folks:
 
 I'm sure many of you are already aware of this news, but one of the heads of 
 Collaboration @ Cisco (I believe Rowan) has made a brief statement today 
 saying, we will do the right thing for everyone. There's also some rumors 
 floating around the Cisco Partner collaboration forums that a manager of the 
 Cisco UC Master program confirmed CCIE Voice will be grandfathered into the 
 CCIE Collab track. I don't believe this is confirmed so please don't hold me 
 to it, but feel free to visit the threads for updated information.
 
 Lastly, a community moderator confirmed that Cisco is reviewing all the 
 concerns being posted.
 
 https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/56611?start=45tstart=0
 
 https://communities.cisco.com/thread/35337?tstart=0
 
 Honestly, it's really great to see how everyone came together, spoke loudly, 
 and made a difference. Even if the decision isn't reversed, the past few days 
 really demonstrated how dedicated and passionate everyone is to their field 
 and hard-earned certifications.
 
 I'm beginning to see a light at the end of the tunnel.
 
 Daniel Pagan, CCIE # 25689
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
 michael.se...@compucom.com
 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 1:03 PM
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition path from 
 CCIE Voice to CCIE Collaboration
 Importance: High
 
 If you haven't already done so please sign this petition: 
 http://chn.ge/17A0zXE
 
 Michael Sears, CCIE(V)#38404
 Designing and Implementing Cisco Unified Communications on Unified Computing 
 Systems
 
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition path from CCIE Voice to CCIE Collaboration

2013-06-05 Thread Josh Reola
Just released.

To all of our CCIE Voice professionals. Here is a statement from the Director 
of Marketing at Learning@Cisco:

We are listening to the feedback from our valued CCIE community, and will be 
adjusting the CCIE Collaboration requirements. As a quick preview of the 
evolution of the CCIE Collaboration certification, a current holder of the CCIE 
Voice designation will now be able to migrate to a CCIE Collaboration 
credential by taking the CCIE Collaboration written exam only. We appreciate 
all of the great feedback and patience of the community while we update our 
webpages to reflect this change. We will be communicating further details about 
this modification as soon as possible.


Just the messenger,


Josh Reola
www.ciscosimplified.com

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 5, 2013, at 2:40 PM, William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com wrote:

 Daniel,
 
 First, let me touch on the most important point you have brought up:
 
 Honestly, it's really great to see how everyone came together, spoke loudly, 
 and made a difference. Even if the decision isn't reversed, the past few 
 days really demonstrated how dedicated and passionate everyone is to their 
 field and hard-earned certifications.
 
 Absolutely outstanding! Everyone has done a great job of keeping this topic 
 on Cisco's radar. Keep it up!
 
 Second, I am at the PBT in SJC. Rowan mentioned the CCIE but it was just an 
 acknowledgement that our message has been received. The right thing comment 
 was actually made by another person (name escapes me). Rowan may have echoed 
 the sentiment but no guarantees/promises were made. This isn't bad news. All 
 feedback we have received thus far has been a positive trend in the right 
 direction. Even if it has been incremental.
 
 So, there is a light at the end of the tunnel. Cisco will want to close this 
 down as fast as possible. Whatever the answer is, we can all be satisfied 
 that we refused to roll over on this. Again, the volume of support within the 
 community is quite impressive. Don't back off the throttle now. Keep pushing, 
 stay on message, and (as always) be polite.
 
 
 -Bill
 
 --
 William Bell, CCIE #38914
 blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
 Follow me on twitter @ucguerrilla
 
 
 
 
 On Jun 5, 2013, at 2:14 PM, Daniel Pagan dpa...@fidelus.com wrote:
 
 Folks:
 
 I'm sure many of you are already aware of this news, but one of the heads of 
 Collaboration @ Cisco (I believe Rowan) has made a brief statement today 
 saying, we will do the right thing for everyone. There's also some rumors 
 floating around the Cisco Partner collaboration forums that a manager of the 
 Cisco UC Master program confirmed CCIE Voice will be grandfathered into the 
 CCIE Collab track. I don't believe this is confirmed so please don't hold me 
 to it, but feel free to visit the threads for updated information.
 
 Lastly, a community moderator confirmed that Cisco is reviewing all the 
 concerns being posted.
 
 https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/56611?start=45tstart=0
 
 https://communities.cisco.com/thread/35337?tstart=0
 
 Honestly, it's really great to see how everyone came together, spoke loudly, 
 and made a difference. Even if the decision isn't reversed, the past few 
 days really demonstrated how dedicated and passionate everyone is to their 
 field and hard-earned certifications.
 
 I'm beginning to see a light at the end of the tunnel.
 
 Daniel Pagan, CCIE # 25689
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
 michael.se...@compucom.com
 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 1:03 PM
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition path from 
 CCIE Voice to CCIE Collaboration
 Importance: High
 
 If you haven't already done so please sign this petition: 
 http://chn.ge/17A0zXE
 
 Michael Sears, CCIE(V)#38404
 Designing and Implementing Cisco Unified Communications on Unified 
 Computing Systems
 
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition path from CCIE

2013-06-05 Thread Smith, Adam
 don't believe this is confirmed so please don't hold me 
 to it, but feel free to visit the threads for updated information.
 
 Lastly, a community moderator confirmed that Cisco is reviewing all the 
 concerns being posted.
 
 https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/56611?start=45tstart=0
 
 https://communities.cisco.com/thread/35337?tstart=0
 
 Honestly, it's really great to see how everyone came together, spoke loudly, 
 and made a difference. Even if the decision isn't reversed, the past few days 
 really demonstrated how dedicated and passionate everyone is to their field 
 and hard-earned certifications.
 
 I'm beginning to see a light at the end of the tunnel.
 
 Daniel Pagan, CCIE # 25689
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
 michael.se...@compucom.com
 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 1:03 PM
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition 
 path from CCIE Voice to CCIE Collaboration
 Importance: High
 
 If you haven't already done so please sign this petition: 
 http://chn.ge/17A0zXE
 
 Michael Sears, CCIE(V)#38404
 Designing and Implementing Cisco Unified Communications on Unified Computing 
 Systems
 
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, 
 please visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, 
 please visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20130605/681c7fcb/attachment-0001.html

--

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 18:33:50 -0400
From: Michael Miller kf4...@gmail.com
To: William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com,
michael.se...@compucom.com michael.se...@compucom.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition
path from CCIE Voice to CCIE Collaboration
Message-ID:
cafzrabznqkfnksyjb4x4yxija+no_q-3zlucespef0kb2dj...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

This post was made on the Learning @ Cisco Facebook page:

To all of our CCIE Voice professionals. Here is a statement from Fred Weiller, 
Director of Marketing at Learning@Cisco:
We are listening to the feedback from our valued CCIE community, and will be 
adjusting the CCIE Collaboration requirements. As a quick preview of the 
evolution of the CCIE Collaboration certification, a current holder of the CCIE 
Voice designation will now be able to migrate to a CCIE Collaboration 
credential by taking the CCIE Collaboration written exam only. We appreciate 
all of the great feedback and patience of the community while we update our 
webpages to reflect this change. We will be communicating further details about 
this modification as soon as possible.
It seems the request for a migration path via written exam will be the way 
forward.

Thanks,

Mike

On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:40 PM, William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com wrote:

 Daniel,

 First, let me touch on the most important point you have brought up:

 Honestly, it's really great to see how everyone came together, spoke 
 loudly, and made a difference. Even if the decision isn't reversed, 
 the past few days really demonstrated how dedicated and passionate 
 everyone is to their field and hard-earned certifications.


 Absolutely outstanding! Everyone has done a great job of keeping this 
 topic on Cisco's radar. Keep it up!

 Second, I am at the PBT in SJC. Rowan mentioned the CCIE but it was 
 just an acknowledgement that our message has been received. The right thing
 comment was actually made by another person (name escapes me). Rowan 
 may have echoed the sentiment but no guarantees/promises were made. 
 This isn't bad news. All feedback we have received thus far has been a 
 positive trend in the right direction. Even if it has been incremental.

 So, there is a light at the end of the tunnel. Cisco will want to 
 close this down as fast as possible. Whatever the answer is, we can 
 all be satisfied that we refused to roll over on this. Again, the 
 volume of support within the community is quite impressive. Don't back 
 off the throttle now. Keep pushing, stay on message, and (as always) be 
 polite.


 -Bill

 --
 William Bell, CCIE #38914
 blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
 Follow me on twitter @ucguerrilla




 On Jun 5, 2013, at 2:14 PM, Daniel Pagan dpa...@fidelus.com wrote:

 Folks:

 I'm sure many of you are already aware of this news, but one of the 
 heads of Collaboration @ Cisco (I believe Rowan) has made a brief 
 statement today

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 88, Issue 33

2013-06-05 Thread Ramon De La Cruz
 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20130605/681c7fcb/attachment-0001.html
 
 --
 
 Message: 2
 Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 18:33:50 -0400
 From: Michael Miller kf4...@gmail.com
 To: William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com,
michael.se...@compucom.com michael.se...@compucom.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition
path from CCIE Voice to CCIE Collaboration
 Message-ID:
cafzrabznqkfnksyjb4x4yxija+no_q-3zlucespef0kb2dj...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
 
 This post was made on the Learning @ Cisco Facebook page:
 
 To all of our CCIE Voice professionals. Here is a statement from Fred
 Weiller, Director of Marketing at Learning@Cisco:
 We are listening to the feedback from our valued CCIE community, and will
 be adjusting the CCIE Collaboration requirements. As a quick preview of the
 evolution of the CCIE Collaboration certification, a current holder of the
 CCIE Voice designation will now be able to migrate to a CCIE Collaboration
 credential by taking the CCIE Collaboration written exam only. We
 appreciate all of the great feedback and patience of the community while we
 update our webpages to reflect this change. We will be communicating
 further details about this modification as soon as possible.
 It seems the request for a migration path via written exam will be the way
 forward.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Mike
 
 On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:40 PM, William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com wrote:
 
 Daniel,
 
 First, let me touch on the most important point you have brought up:
 
 Honestly, it's really great to see how everyone came together, spoke
 loudly, and made a difference. Even if the decision isn't reversed, the
 past few days really demonstrated how dedicated and passionate everyone is
 to their field and hard-earned certifications.
 
 
 Absolutely outstanding! Everyone has done a great job of keeping this
 topic on Cisco's radar. Keep it up!
 
 Second, I am at the PBT in SJC. Rowan mentioned the CCIE but it was just
 an acknowledgement that our message has been received. The right thing
 comment was actually made by another person (name escapes me). Rowan may
 have echoed the sentiment but no guarantees/promises were made. This isn't
 bad news. All feedback we have received thus far has been a positive trend
 in the right direction. Even if it has been incremental.
 
 So, there is a light at the end of the tunnel. Cisco will want to close
 this down as fast as possible. Whatever the answer is, we can all be
 satisfied that we refused to roll over on this. Again, the volume of
 support within the community is quite impressive. Don't back off the
 throttle now. Keep pushing, stay on message, and (as always) be polite.
 
 
 -Bill
 
 --
 William Bell, CCIE #38914
 blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
 Follow me on twitter @ucguerrilla
 
 
 
 
 On Jun 5, 2013, at 2:14 PM, Daniel Pagan dpa...@fidelus.com wrote:
 
 Folks:
 
 I'm sure many of you are already aware of this news, but one of the heads
 of Collaboration @ Cisco (I believe Rowan) has made a brief statement today
 saying, we will do the right thing for everyone. There's also some rumors
 floating around the Cisco Partner collaboration forums that a manager of
 the Cisco UC Master program confirmed CCIE Voice will be grandfathered into
 the CCIE Collab track. I don't believe this is confirmed so please don't
 hold me to it, but feel free to visit the threads for updated information.
 
 Lastly, a community moderator confirmed that Cisco is reviewing all the
 concerns being posted.
 
 https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/56611?start=45tstart=0
 
 https://communities.cisco.com/thread/35337?tstart=0
 
 Honestly, it's really great to see how everyone came together, spoke
 loudly, and made a difference. Even if the decision isn't reversed, the
 past few days really demonstrated how dedicated and passionate everyone is
 to their field and hard-earned certifications.
 
 I'm beginning to see a light at the end of the tunnel.
 
 Daniel Pagan, CCIE # 25689
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
 ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
 michael.se...@compucom.com
 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 1:03 PM
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition path
 from CCIE Voice to CCIE Collaboration
 Importance: High
 
 If you haven't already done so please sign this petition:
 http://chn.ge/17A0zXE
 
 Michael Sears, CCIE(V)#38404
 Designing and Implementing Cisco Unified Communications on Unified

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition path from CCIE Voice to CCIE Collaboration

2013-06-05 Thread nielsenj
Just got this in my email:

Hi All, Great news! Cisco has made the following announcement: We are
listening to the feedback from our valued CCIE community, and will be
adjusting the
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/community/certifications/ccie_collaborationCCIE
Collaboration requirements. As a quick preview of the evolution of the
CCIE Collaboration certification, a current holder of the
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/community/certifications/ccie_voice CCIE
Voice designation will now be able to migrate to a CCIE Collaboration
credential by taking the CCIE Collaboration written exam only. We
appreciate all of the great feedback and patience of the community while we
update our webpages to reflect this change. We will be communicating
further details about this modification as soon as possible.
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-20968
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-20968 Regards, Rigo Cisco
Learning Network Moderator



Jason Nielsen
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:02 PM, michael.se...@compucom.com wrote:

 If you haven't already done so please sign this petition:
 http://chn.ge/17A0zXE

 Michael Sears, CCIE(V)#38404
 Designing and Implementing Cisco Unified Communications on Unified
 Computing Systems


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab strategy

2013-06-05 Thread Somphol Boonjing
Just my personal experience when I failed my first lab attempt.   CUE is at
the forefront of the time waster.   Simply because it requires constant
reboot if mistake is made and every reboots take a long time too.

 10 ) CUE integration and trafer setup takes 20 mins

My brain seems to go numb at times too.  Simple stuff becomes a lot harder,
and I still looking back on the day as how on earth I miss that easy fix.
Not saying that without it I would pass, I just think I wouldn't the
thoroughly outclassed by it.

Regards,
--Somphol.


--Somphol


On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Martin Sloan martinsloa...@gmail.comwrote:

 Let me say, I've never sat the lab so I'm just commenting on my own study
 experience.

  - Points 3  4 are probably consuming too much time.  Documenting IP's is
 good but I don't currently go through and check configs.  I figure i'll get
 to it when it's time to configure that piece and if there are issues I'll
 do my troubleshooting then.
  - 1.5hrs for Br2 seems like a long time.  I think you can get quicker
 with that part and do it in 45min or less, depending on the complexity.

 Just with those savings you're getting closer to your 6 hour goal.  I use
 notepad for anything that can be repeated like dial-peers, translation
 rules/patterns, dspfarm, QoS, etc.  I think its MUCH faster than manually
 typing the configs each time.  I always configure BR1 first so most of the
 time I'm just tweaking some settings and pasting into BR2.

 Just my input based on my own studies.  I'm sure there are veterans out
 there who have a better insight into saving time.  I'm interested to hear
 their take as well.

 Marty


 On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:58 AM, singh singh8...@in.com wrote:


 hi Everyone,

 I need your inputs here. I have been trying to complete mock and practice
 labs in 8 hours . However their I am unable to finish or I finish with lab
 with a lot of mistakes with no time for testing.

 I also realize that I lose thing in the first half and speed up during
 the end . Generally I take...

 1) 10 mins to test if all equipment is working fine ( 10 mins)
 2) read the workbook questions for the next 15 mins
 3) Make note of the ip addresses and router configuration per site in 25
 mins
 4) Make note of all cucm configuration , cups , unity connection , uccx
 and cue for another  dial plan 20 mins
 5) Now from point 5 - I start with lab configurations from Branch 2 (
 site c - which is a mgcp gateway and srst setup) this generally takes me
 about 1 and a half hour to just complete all configuration ( 1 hour and 30
 mins)
 6) Then I move to Branch 1 ( site B - which is a H323 gateway with srst)
 this ge nerally takes about 45 - 50 mins
 7) I then move to HQ ( R1 - which is MGCP gateway with srst ) this
 generally takes 20 mins .
 8) Basic setup of DP , css, aar, NTP , service parameters and enterprise
 para , vlans , dhcp and ip phone registration takes 50 mins
 9) CUC integ and other config including recording takes 20 mins
 10 ) CUE integration and trafer setup takes 20 mins
 11) UCCX integration , One button , script and recording takes 40 mins
 12) CUPs integration and client setup takes 20 mins
 13 )I then come back to callmanger and do the media resource setup ,
 gateways added cucm , other configuration such as MVA , RSVP , + dial ,
 adding trunks , unassigned dn setup to CUC - this takes 50 mins
 14 ) Then I move to the Route pattern setup on callmanger this I do for 3
 sites - HQ , Site B and Site C with or without redundancy on callmanger
 this takes 25 mins
 15 ) Then do this such as RTMT log collection and indicating informa tion
 in seperate files , MGCP debugs this takes another 15 mins
 16 ) Switch and WAN QOS this I plan to do only if time permits as this is
 a complex section


 Questions :
 ===

 1) I barely am able to finish things in time . I have heard from on this
 forum that there are candidates who finish it is 5 - 6 hours . Would anyone
 be able to share with me as to how they do this ?

 2) Even if the above I complete exercises are complete there are sections
 where I miss out on configurations. How do I make sure all config for all
 sections is done correctly?

 3) I really wish I am able to finish the lab in 6 hours so that I can
 test for another 2 hours . Could someone therefore check the above 16
 points and let me know about the time I can reduce.

 4) As you can see above the router configurations consume a bit more time
 making ( points 5 , 6 , 7 ) . I have tried with both using a notepad to
 type the configurations and then paste  also with typing on cli but both
 these methods take
 around the same time. Please let me know what best method I can use for
 points 5 , 6 , 7.


 5) Other suggestions are most welcome .



 Thanks guys in advance for all your help!

 Regards,
 Singh




 Get Yourself a cool, short *@in.com* Email ID 
 now!http://www3.in.com/sso/commonregister.php?ref=INutm_source=inviteutm_medium=outgoing

 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab strategy

2013-06-05 Thread Bill Lake
Where are you taking your lab?  That has to play into your plan in taking
the lab.

I took my lab at RTP, my plan was to use the device base approach.

1)  I reviewed the outline of the lab, looking for very specific things
throughout the lab that required early planning.  An example of this would
be a System wide parameter that I would need to configure early on.

2) quickly notepad the items I would need throughout the lab


3) rough scope of the lab, my device based approach and dial plan page

This took about 20 minutes to complete and in my opinion you should not
spend more than 30 and your goal should be 15.

At this point I started my device based approach and for me this was my
order
   1) HQ switch
   2) do base to get CUE started and start CUE
   3) HQ Router
   4) SB router
   5) Check on CUE, do anything I thought I needed and could then reboot it
   6) SC router
   7) finish CUE
   8) base CUCM
   9) dial-plan with testing as I go all calls in round robin so I am using
every phone to make calls (try to complete to this point)

when 5 minutes before archive or back up all configs you can just incase

Lunch

   10) finish CUCM
   11) CUC
12) CUPS
13) UCCX
14) Test everything you can

Make sure you do not get stuck on one thing, spend 10 minutes and move on,
circle back and try to complete it but keep moving.  I know it sounds
simple but you will be amazed how long you might spend on a 2-3 point item
you know you can do when it is costing you other points you could be
scoring.

During your testing focus on being the proctor and thinking how he might
find fault in what you did.  Almost working perfectly won't get you the
points.

Bill



On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Martin Sloan martinsloa...@gmail.comwrote:

 Let me say, I've never sat the lab so I'm just commenting on my own study
 experience.

  - Points 3  4 are probably consuming too much time.  Documenting IP's is
 good but I don't currently go through and check configs.  I figure i'll get
 to it when it's time to configure that piece and if there are issues I'll
 do my troubleshooting then.
  - 1.5hrs for Br2 seems like a long time.  I think you can get quicker
 with that part and do it in 45min or less, depending on the complexity.

 Just with those savings you're getting closer to your 6 hour goal.  I use
 notepad for anything that can be repeated like dial-peers, translation
 rules/patterns, dspfarm, QoS, etc.  I think its MUCH faster than manually
 typing the configs each time.  I always configure BR1 first so most of the
 time I'm just tweaking some settings and pasting into BR2.

 Just my input based on my own studies.  I'm sure there are veterans out
 there who have a better insight into saving time.  I'm interested to hear
 their take as well.

 Marty


 On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:58 AM, singh singh8...@in.com wrote:


 hi Everyone,

 I need your inputs here. I have been trying to complete mock and practice
 labs in 8 hours . However their I am unable to finish or I finish with lab
 with a lot of mistakes with no time for testing.

 I also realize that I lose thing in the first half and speed up during
 the end . Generally I take...

 1) 10 mins to test if all equipment is working fine ( 10 mins)
 2) read the workbook questions for the next 15 mins
 3) Make note of the ip addresses and router configuration per site in 25
 mins
 4) Make note of all cucm configuration , cups , unity connection , uccx
 and cue for another  dial plan 20 mins
 5) Now from point 5 - I start with lab configurations from Branch 2 (
 site c - which is a mgcp gateway and srst setup) this generally takes me
 about 1 and a half hour to just complete all configuration ( 1 hour and 30
 mins)
 6) Then I move to Branch 1 ( site B - which is a H323 gateway with srst)
 this ge nerally takes about 45 - 50 mins
 7) I then move to HQ ( R1 - which is MGCP gateway with srst ) this
 generally takes 20 mins .
 8) Basic setup of DP , css, aar, NTP , service parameters and enterprise
 para , vlans , dhcp and ip phone registration takes 50 mins
 9) CUC integ and other config including recording takes 20 mins
 10 ) CUE integration and trafer setup takes 20 mins
 11) UCCX integration , One button , script and recording takes 40 mins
 12) CUPs integration and client setup takes 20 mins
 13 )I then come back to callmanger and do the media resource setup ,
 gateways added cucm , other configuration such as MVA , RSVP , + dial ,
 adding trunks , unassigned dn setup to CUC - this takes 50 mins
 14 ) Then I move to the Route pattern setup on callmanger this I do for 3
 sites - HQ , Site B and Site C with or without redundancy on callmanger
 this takes 25 mins
 15 ) Then do this such as RTMT log collection and indicating informa tion
 in seperate files , MGCP debugs this takes another 15 mins
 16 ) Switch and WAN QOS this I plan to do only if time permits as this is
 a complex section


 Questions :
 ===

 1) I barely am able to finish things in time 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition path from CCIE Voice to CCIE Collaboration

2013-06-05 Thread Bill Lake
This is the post on Cisco website.

https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-20968

I hope my argument helped and I want to thank all those that spent an equal
and thoughtful amount of time on this.  Success only means we get a
reasonable path to migration and I believe this should be considered a
WIN/WIN for both Cisco and us.

Bill


On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:35 PM, nielsenj niels...@gmail.com wrote:

 Just got this in my email:

 Hi All, Great news! Cisco has made the following announcement: We are
 listening to the feedback from our valued CCIE community, and will be
 adjusting the
 https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/community/certifications/ccie_collaborationCCIE
  Collaboration requirements. As a quick preview of the evolution of the
 CCIE Collaboration certification, a current holder of the
 https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/community/certifications/ccie_voiceCCIE 
 Voice designation will now be able to migrate to a CCIE Collaboration
 credential by taking the CCIE Collaboration written exam only. We
 appreciate all of the great feedback and patience of the community while we
 update our webpages to reflect this change. We will be communicating
 further details about this modification as soon as possible.
 https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-20968
 https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-20968 Regards, Rigo Cisco
 Learning Network Moderator



 Jason Nielsen
 On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:02 PM, michael.se...@compucom.com wrote:

 If you haven't already done so please sign this petition:
 http://chn.ge/17A0zXE

 Michael Sears, CCIE(V)#38404
 Designing and Implementing Cisco Unified Communications on Unified
 Computing Systems


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab strategy

2013-06-05 Thread Bill Lake
Ok my last email got sent back
Where are you taking your lab?  That has to play into your plan in taking
the lab.
I took my lab at RTP, my plan was to use the device base approach.

1)  I reviewed the outline of the lab, looking for very specific things
throughout the lab that required early planning.  An example of this would
be a System wide parameter that I would need to configure early on.
2) quickly notepad the items I would need throughout the lab
3) rough scope of the lab, my device based approach and dial plan page

This took about 20 minutes to complete and in my opinion you should not
spend more than 30 and your goal should be 15.

At this point I started my device based approach and for me this was my
order
   1) HQ switch
   2) do base to get CUE started and start CUE
   3) HQ Router
   4) SB router
   5) Check on CUE, do anything I thought I needed and could then reboot it
   6) SC router
   7) finish CUE
   8) base CUCM
   9) dial-plan with testing as I go all calls in round robin so I am using
every phone to make calls (try to complete to this point)

when 5 minutes before archive or back up all configs you can just incase

Lunch

   10) finish CUCM
   11) CUC
12) CUPS
13) UCCX
14) Test everything you can

Make sure you do not get stuck on one thing, spend 10 minutes and move on,
circle back and try to complete it but keep moving.  I know it sounds
simple but you will be amazed how long you might spend on a 2-3 point item
you know you can do when it is costing you other points you could be
scoring.

During your testing focus on being the proctor and thinking how he might
find fault in what you did.  Almost working perfectly won't get you the
points.



On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:58 AM, singh singh8...@in.com wrote:


 hi Everyone,

 I need your inputs here. I have been trying to complete mock and practice
 labs in 8 hours . However their I am unable to finish or I finish with lab
 with a lot of mistakes with no time for testing.

 I also realize that I lose thing in the first half and speed up during the
 end . Generally I take...

 1) 10 mins to test if all equipment is working fine ( 10 mins)
 2) read the workbook questions for the next 15 mins
 3) Make note of the ip addresses and router configuration per site in 25
 mins
 4) Make note of all cucm configuration , cups , unity connection , uccx
 and cue for another  dial plan 20 mins
 5) Now from point 5 - I start with lab configurations from Branch 2 ( site
 c - which is a mgcp gateway and srst setup) this generally takes me about 1
 and a half hour to just complete all configuration ( 1 hour and 30 mins)
 6) Then I move to Branch 1 ( site B - which is a H323 gateway with srst)
 this ge nerally takes about 45 - 50 mins
 7) I then move to HQ ( R1 - which is MGCP gateway with srst ) this
 generally takes 20 mins .
 8) Basic setup of DP , css, aar, NTP , service parameters and enterprise
 para , vlans , dhcp and ip phone registration takes 50 mins
 9) CUC integ and other config including recording takes 20 mins
 10 ) CUE integration and trafer setup takes 20 mins
 11) UCCX integration , One button , script and recording takes 40 mins
 12) CUPs integration and client setup takes 20 mins
 13 )I then come back to callmanger and do the media resource setup ,
 gateways added cucm , other configuration such as MVA , RSVP , + dial ,
 adding trunks , unassigned dn setup to CUC - this takes 50 mins
 14 ) Then I move to the Route pattern setup on callmanger this I do for 3
 sites - HQ , Site B and Site C with or without redundancy on callmanger
 this takes 25 mins
 15 ) Then do this such as RTMT log collection and indicating informa tion
 in seperate files , MGCP debugs this takes another 15 mins
 16 ) Switch and WAN QOS this I plan to do only if time permits as this is
 a complex section


 Questions :
 ===

 1) I barely am able to finish things in time . I have heard from on this
 forum that there are candidates who finish it is 5 - 6 hours . Would anyone
 be able to share with me as to how they do this ?

 2) Even if the above I complete exercises are complete there are sections
 where I miss out on configurations. How do I make sure all config for all
 sections is done correctly?

 3) I really wish I am able to finish the lab in 6 hours so that I can test
 for another 2 hours . Could someone therefore check the above 16 points and
 let me know about the time I can reduce.

 4) As you can see above the router configurations consume a bit more time
 making ( points 5 , 6 , 7 ) . I have tried with both using a notepad to
 type the configurations and then paste  also with typing on cli but both
 these methods take
 around the same time. Please let me know what best method I can use for
 points 5 , 6 , 7.


 5) Other suggestions are most welcome .



 Thanks guys in advance for all your help!

 Regards,
 Singh




 Get Yourself a cool, short *@in.com* Email ID 
 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 88, Issue 36

2013-06-05 Thread Larry Stern
This is awesome news still holding my breath till it becomes official on the 
Cisco's website, I am now even prouder to be part of this community, a group of 
people who articulated so well what was wrong, and gave all the right reasons 
why it should be corrected.

I got many grey hairs the past week.

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 8:04 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 88, Issue 36

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: 
Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition path from CCIE
  Voice to CCIE Collaboration (nielsenj)
   2. Re: Lab strategy (Somphol Boonjing)
   3. Re: Lab strategy (Bill Lake)


--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 18:35:51 -0500
From: nielsenj niels...@gmail.com
To: michael.se...@compucom.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition
path from CCIE Voice to CCIE Collaboration
Message-ID:
caclo9kygnnnpa+bat29sx0srzr-mgmm1yjrt4jkw1yr9qa7...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Just got this in my email:

Hi All, Great news! Cisco has made the following announcement: We are 
listening to the feedback from our valued CCIE community, and will be adjusting 
the 
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/community/certifications/ccie_collaborationCCIE
Collaboration requirements. As a quick preview of the evolution of the CCIE 
Collaboration certification, a current holder of the 
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/community/certifications/ccie_voice CCIE 
Voice designation will now be able to migrate to a CCIE Collaboration 
credential by taking the CCIE Collaboration written exam only. We appreciate 
all of the great feedback and patience of the community while we update our 
webpages to reflect this change. We will be communicating further details about 
this modification as soon as possible.
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-20968
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-20968 Regards, Rigo Cisco Learning 
Network Moderator



Jason Nielsen
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:02 PM, michael.se...@compucom.com wrote:

 If you haven't already done so please sign this petition:
 http://chn.ge/17A0zXE

 Michael Sears, CCIE(V)#38404
 Designing and Implementing Cisco Unified Communications on Unified
 Computing Systems


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20130605/bfbcef1c/attachment-0001.html

--

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 10:03:14 +1000
From: Somphol Boonjing somp...@gmail.com
To: Martin Sloan martinsloa...@gmail.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com,
singh singh8...@in.com, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab strategy
Message-ID:
cabcktng9rxp6mouzcouq5uukrfzmfa1nod7+ze0hn1obwd0...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Just my personal experience when I failed my first lab attempt.   CUE is at
the forefront of the time waster.   Simply because it requires constant
reboot if mistake is made and every reboots take a long time too.

 10 ) CUE integration and trafer setup takes 20 mins

My brain seems to go numb at times too.  Simple stuff becomes a lot harder, and 
I still looking back on the day as how on earth I miss that easy fix.
Not saying that without it I would pass, I just think I wouldn't the thoroughly 
outclassed by it.

Regards,
--Somphol.


--Somphol


On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Martin Sloan martinsloa...@gmail.comwrote:

 Let me say, I've never sat the lab so I'm just commenting on my own
 study experience.

  - Points 3  4 are probably consuming too much time.  Documenting
 IP's is good but I don't currently go through and check configs.  I
 figure i'll get to it when it's time to configure that piece and if
 there are issues I'll do my troubleshooting then.
  - 1.5hrs for Br2 seems like a long time.  I think you can get quicker
 with that part and do it in 45min

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab strategy

2013-06-05 Thread Somphol Boonjing
Thanks, Bill for great information.

BTW, if I could ask about your thought on the VNC-only workstation.   I
don't really understand the logic behind making and RDP available for
Windows-based UCCX server, and only supply the VNC session for another
utility host.  (I was in a rush to such an extent that I couldn't even have
time nor effort to spend on finding the password to access the VNC
session, I know it is right there somewhere obvious.  Sigh.  Hope I do
better next time.)

Regards,
--Somphol.


--Somphol


On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote:

 Where are you taking your lab?  That has to play into your plan in taking
 the lab.

 I took my lab at RTP, my plan was to use the device base approach.

 1)  I reviewed the outline of the lab, looking for very specific things
 throughout the lab that required early planning.  An example of this would
 be a System wide parameter that I would need to configure early on.

 2) quickly notepad the items I would need throughout the lab


 3) rough scope of the lab, my device based approach and dial plan page

 This took about 20 minutes to complete and in my opinion you should not
 spend more than 30 and your goal should be 15.

 At this point I started my device based approach and for me this was my
 order
1) HQ switch
2) do base to get CUE started and start CUE
3) HQ Router
4) SB router
5) Check on CUE, do anything I thought I needed and could then reboot it
6) SC router
7) finish CUE
8) base CUCM
9) dial-plan with testing as I go all calls in round robin so I am
 using every phone to make calls (try to complete to this point)

 when 5 minutes before archive or back up all configs you can just incase

 Lunch

10) finish CUCM
11) CUC
 12) CUPS
 13) UCCX
 14) Test everything you can

 Make sure you do not get stuck on one thing, spend 10 minutes and move on,
 circle back and try to complete it but keep moving.  I know it sounds
 simple but you will be amazed how long you might spend on a 2-3 point item
 you know you can do when it is costing you other points you could be
 scoring.

 During your testing focus on being the proctor and thinking how he might
 find fault in what you did.  Almost working perfectly won't get you the
 points.

 Bill



 On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Martin Sloan martinsloa...@gmail.comwrote:

 Let me say, I've never sat the lab so I'm just commenting on my own study
 experience.

  - Points 3  4 are probably consuming too much time.  Documenting IP's
 is good but I don't currently go through and check configs.  I figure i'll
 get to it when it's time to configure that piece and if there are issues
 I'll do my troubleshooting then.
  - 1.5hrs for Br2 seems like a long time.  I think you can get quicker
 with that part and do it in 45min or less, depending on the complexity.

 Just with those savings you're getting closer to your 6 hour goal.  I use
 notepad for anything that can be repeated like dial-peers, translation
 rules/patterns, dspfarm, QoS, etc.  I think its MUCH faster than manually
 typing the configs each time.  I always configure BR1 first so most of the
 time I'm just tweaking some settings and pasting into BR2.

 Just my input based on my own studies.  I'm sure there are veterans out
 there who have a better insight into saving time.  I'm interested to hear
 their take as well.

 Marty


 On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:58 AM, singh singh8...@in.com wrote:


 hi Everyone,

 I need your inputs here. I have been trying to complete mock and
 practice labs in 8 hours . However their I am unable to finish or I finish
 with lab with a lot of mistakes with no time for testing.

 I also realize that I lose thing in the first half and speed up during
 the end . Generally I take...

 1) 10 mins to test if all equipment is working fine ( 10 mins)
 2) read the workbook questions for the next 15 mins
 3) Make note of the ip addresses and router configuration per site in 25
 mins
 4) Make note of all cucm configuration , cups , unity connection , uccx
 and cue for another  dial plan 20 mins
 5) Now from point 5 - I start with lab configurations from Branch 2 (
 site c - which is a mgcp gateway and srst setup) this generally takes me
 about 1 and a half hour to just complete all configuration ( 1 hour and 30
 mins)
 6) Then I move to Branch 1 ( site B - which is a H323 gateway with srst)
 this ge nerally takes about 45 - 50 mins
 7) I then move to HQ ( R1 - which is MGCP gateway with srst ) this
 generally takes 20 mins .
 8) Basic setup of DP , css, aar, NTP , service parameters and enterprise
 para , vlans , dhcp and ip phone registration takes 50 mins
 9) CUC integ and other config including recording takes 20 mins
 10 ) CUE integration and trafer setup takes 20 mins
 11) UCCX integration , One button , script and recording takes 40 mins
 12) CUPs integration and client setup takes 20 mins
 13 )I then come back to callmanger and do the media resource 

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thank You

2013-06-05 Thread Martin Sloan
Ben,

I just pulled away from a timed practice lab to get the news of the CCIE
Voice to CCIE Collaboration transition change about 2 hours late.  This is
awesome news!!

I was a restaurant manager for many years and I know that people can be
quick to complain but not so fast to commend, so I wanted to be sure and
THANK YOU for changing the policy on the CCIE Voice/Collaboration
certifications.  Cisco has done the right thing and you have my sincerest
gratitude for any part you played in this change.

I don't have 'a number' yet, but with this news my enthusiasm to get the
certification is restored and I know that you've made a lot folks happy
with this change in policy.

Thank you again, and hopefully I'll be taking a written exam to get that
Collaboration IE instead of the lab.

Marty
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition path from CCIE

2013-06-05 Thread Bagamanova
 
 floating around the Cisco Partner collaboration forums that a manager of the 
 Cisco UC Master program confirmed CCIE Voice will be grandfathered into the 
 CCIE Collab track. I don't believe this is confirmed so please don't hold me 
 to it, but feel free to visit the threads for updated information.
 
 Lastly, a community moderator confirmed that Cisco is reviewing all the 
 concerns being posted.
 
 https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/56611?start=45tstart=0
 
 https://communities.cisco.com/thread/35337?tstart=0
 
 Honestly, it's really great to see how everyone came together, spoke loudly, 
 and made a difference. Even if the decision isn't reversed, the past few 
 days really demonstrated how dedicated and passionate everyone is to their 
 field and hard-earned certifications.
 
 I'm beginning to see a light at the end of the tunnel.
 
 Daniel Pagan, CCIE # 25689
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
 michael.se...@compucom.com
 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 1:03 PM
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition 
 path from CCIE Voice to CCIE Collaboration
 Importance: High
 
 If you haven't already done so please sign this petition: 
 http://chn.ge/17A0zXE
 
 Michael Sears, CCIE(V)#38404
 Designing and Implementing Cisco Unified Communications on Unified 
 Computing Systems
 
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, 
 please visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, 
 please visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20130605/681c7fcb/attachment-0001.html
 
 --
 
 Message: 2
 Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 18:33:50 -0400
 From: Michael Miller kf4...@gmail.com
 To: William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com,
michael.se...@compucom.com michael.se...@compucom.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition
path from CCIE Voice to CCIE Collaboration
 Message-ID:
cafzrabznqkfnksyjb4x4yxija+no_q-3zlucespef0kb2dj...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
 
 This post was made on the Learning @ Cisco Facebook page:
 
 To all of our CCIE Voice professionals. Here is a statement from Fred 
 Weiller, Director of Marketing at Learning@Cisco:
 We are listening to the feedback from our valued CCIE community, and will be 
 adjusting the CCIE Collaboration requirements. As a quick preview of the 
 evolution of the CCIE Collaboration certification, a current holder of the 
 CCIE Voice designation will now be able to migrate to a CCIE Collaboration 
 credential by taking the CCIE Collaboration written exam only. We appreciate 
 all of the great feedback and patience of the community while we update our 
 webpages to reflect this change. We will be communicating further details 
 about this modification as soon as possible.
 It seems the request for a migration path via written exam will be the way 
 forward.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Mike
 
 On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:40 PM, William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com wrote:
 
 Daniel,
 
 First, let me touch on the most important point you have brought up:
 
 Honestly, it's really great to see how everyone came together, spoke 
 loudly, and made a difference. Even if the decision isn't reversed, 
 the past few days really demonstrated how dedicated and passionate 
 everyone is to their field and hard-earned certifications.
 
 
 Absolutely outstanding! Everyone has done a great job of keeping this 
 topic on Cisco's radar. Keep it up!
 
 Second, I am at the PBT in SJC. Rowan mentioned the CCIE but it was 
 just an acknowledgement that our message has been received. The right thing
 comment was actually made by another person (name escapes me). Rowan 
 may have echoed the sentiment but no guarantees/promises were made. 
 This isn't bad news. All feedback we have received thus far has been a 
 positive trend in the right direction. Even if it has been incremental.
 
 So, there is a light at the end of the tunnel. Cisco will want to 
 close this down as fast as possible. Whatever the answer is, we can 
 all be satisfied that we refused to roll over on this. Again, the 
 volume of support within the community is quite impressive. Don't back 
 off the throttle now. Keep pushing, stay on message, and (as always) be 
 polite.
 
 
 -Bill
 
 --
 William Bell, CCIE #38914
 blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
 Follow me on twitter @ucguerrilla
 
 
 
 
 On Jun 5, 2013