Re: [Cooker] HELP: Macmillan's packaging a pre-release of Mandrake 7.2
"Charles R. Hurley" wrote: Macmillan/Mandrake calls the box I brought: Linux-Mandrake 7.2 Powerpack Deluxe. Again, how can I tell if this is a pre-release? Look at contents of the i586/VERSION file on the first CD. The real 7.2 is identified as: Linux-Mandrake Odyssey-i586 20001027 15:20 -- Regards, Ron. [AU]
Re: [Cooker] Tcl fconfigure -mode???? FIXED, MANDRAKE support reqd.
Yo, On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 01:54:00PM -0700, Doug Roberts wrote: Well, I fixed the problem. I had to uninstall the Mandrake versions of tcl8.3, including the tcllib, and install tcl8.3.2 from source. After that, fconfigure recognizes the -mode parameter. Mandrake people: something is wrong with your LM7.2 tcl package. Can you send me the actual script so that I can see what is the problem? --Doug On Sunday 26 November 2000 08:15, you wrote: Ok, it appears that between tcl8.0.x and 8.3.2 fconfigure lost it's -mode parameter. Do any of you tcl types know how to set the serial line parameters to 9600 baud, no parity, 8 bits, i stop bit? --Doug On Saturday 25 November 2000 20:09, you wrote: Hi, all. I just tried to run a tcl script that worked fine under LM7.1, but now it barfs with an error message about fconfugre being called with a bad argument from the following line: fconfigure $SRLFILE -blocking 0 -mode 9600,n,8,1 \ -translation binary Here's the error message: bad option "-mode": should be one of -blocking, -buffering, -buffersize, -encoding, -eofchar, or -translation What happened to the -mode argument of fconfigure? -- Douglas Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Geoffrey Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] §õªø· ~/.signature ¤¤¤åbig5 compliant (You can't see it thanks to new glibc. :p) http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~snailtalk ftp://devel.mandrakesoft.com/pub/people/snailtalk "Seven days in a honeymoon makes one whole week."
Re: [Cooker] making ISO cds error with perl in genhdlist_cz2: broken pipe
Franck Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
open B, "| packdrake -b9s $hdlist 40";
foreach (@keys, keys %keys) { print B "$_\n"; }
close B or die "packdrake failed\n";
I get there a broken pipe. I have done some debugging and I found out that
it seems a maximum of about 2000 chararcter can be passed through the pipe
to packdrake without getting a broken pipe.
What is wrong?
Can you check that packdrake is running correctly without piping it first and
with building an archive by a find or similar in a directory ?
Thanks.
François.
Re: [Cooker] GConf-0.11-1mdk is missing files
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Brian J. Murrell") writes:
The file list included in the GConf package from release 0.8-2mdk to
0.11-1mdk seems to have gotten shorter. The following files seemed to
have disappeared:
/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults
/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults/0conf.xml
/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults/schemas
/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults/schemas/0conf.xml
/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults/schemas/desktop
/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults/schemas/desktop/0conf.xml
/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults/schemas/desktop/standard
/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults/schemas/desktop/standard/0conf.xml
/usr/lib/libgconf-1.so.0
/usr/lib/libgconf-1.so.0.0.1
/usr/lib/libgconf-gtk-1.so.0
/usr/lib/libgconf-gtk-1.so.0.0.1
They are now in libGConf1..
--
Frédéric Crozat
MandrakeSoft
RE: [Cooker] kaiman... is this *supposed* to do something?
I got the latest kdemultimedia source tarball and compiled it myself. Doesn't that count as upgrading it? You've to upgrade it to got it work... On Monday 27 November 2000 02:32, you wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey there... Question: has anyone (using mandrake) gotten kaiman to do anything? On the multimedia menu there is an entry for KDE Multimedia player. Selecting this menu entry does nothing. I note that the menu entry points to kaiman. Sound otherwise works on my system. I note that the file association for mp3 files points to kaiman. Clicking on an mp3 file does nothing. Using xmms to open an mp3 works fine. Running kaiman on the commandline results in: Skipped one element '49' Skipped one element '50' Preset_1_Button not handled yet. Ignoring style element Preset_1_Button Preset_2_Button not handled yet. Ignoring style element Preset_2_Button Preset_3_Button not handled yet. Ignoring style element Preset_3_Button Preset_4_Button not handled yet. Ignoring style element Preset_4_Button Preset_5_Button not handled yet. Ignoring style element Preset_5_Button Preset_6_Button not handled yet. Ignoring style element Preset_6_Button Found 24 elements. and then it just sits there and does nothing. I got the source for kdemultimedia, compiled kaiman and running the resulting binary gives the same messages. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.0 iQA/AwUBOiGrjAhKySqSS+rVEQJnIgCgxH0gGrTjNutURSj/s0Jc0/WHargAoOcJ 2/Gv3aq4qxfgEEWVE9YFJXl9 =eHHN -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Cooker] LM 7.2 EXPERT-Minimal installation
On 26 ?? 2000 20:59, Geoffrey Lee wrote: |-sh-utils 1296k, util-linux 2142k |Is it possible to select from them some utils which are always needed, |and place the rest in separate package? System installer doesn't allow |to take them off. | | See below on the XF split. can you comment a little bit? I don't see in your mail something related to this in XF section. |6) libraries |-libtiff 3716k |I have checked what progrums require it: |\rpm -q --requires libtiff |/sbin/ldconfig |ld-linux.so.2 |libc.so.6 |libm.so.6 |libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) |libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) | | No, libtiff requires glibc not the other way around. oops, sorry. I was too sleepy and really used wrong command. #rpm -q --whatrequires libtiff imlib-1.9.8.1-6mdk gdk-pixbuf-loaders-0.9.0-2mdk libtiff-devel-3.5.5-2mdk hylafax-4.1-0.3mdk I am not now on my min. install, so no problem to take off hylafax and libtiff-devel. imlib is required by pygtk, so I guess if I take off pygtk, imlib can be also deleted? Anyway, TIFF is high-level image format, and IMHO it should not be in the same library package with PNG and JPG. TIFF is ok for Adobe Photoshop or may be Gimp, but if I use browser - there is no need for tiff. At least, I haven't seen pages which use tiff graphics. :-) I know that this is imlib (and gdk) question, but I don't know if there is imlib mailing list around. I am not subscribed for it, so please forward my mail to necessary mail list, please. (Mandrake Cooker/XFree86/DRI/LIVID/KDE-all is enough for me at amoment) From End-User point of view: it's apity when I need to install libtiff-imlib- gdk-pixbuf - pygtk just for possibility to make some changes to Linux settings. #rpm -q --whatrequires pygtk draksync-7.2-20mdk icepref-1.1-3mdk drakprofile-4-14mdk I am not fanatic of command line / console, I prefer GUI-based programs and settings. But, in this case (5+ extra programs to get draksync and drakprofile running) I would prefer to switch to console. By the way, in DrakProfile I have 2 options - Home and Office, and don't understand what is the meaning for them. LILO switches 2 partitions (2 Linux installs Standard/Minimal) pretty well for me. Why should I need DrakProfile? | |Glibc uses libtiff? I thought that glibc is low-level library. | |-tcl 5071k |-tk 3598k |both packages are pretty big. ok, #rpm -q --whatrequires tcl none of packages requires tcl #rpm -q --whatrequires tk none of packages requires tk And this is not in minimal install. So I guess nothing will be broken if I delete them in both setups, minimal and standard? Then why Expert-minimal suggested to install them? | |7) Xfree86 |XFree86 - 16127k |I can't belive all files from this package are needed. Is it possible |to split it in several packages? |I highly appreciate that xterm was splitted and placed in separate |package, so it would be nice to do the same wit others. | | xterm is already in a separate package, as of 7.2. yes, I know. And there is aterm; aterm doesn't have menu entry, for some reason. Either aterm or xterm should be added as recommndation to Expert-minimal-workstation setup (but, of course, not as requirement); Both xterm and aterm are much-much smaller then tcl or tk which are present by default. same kind of after-install cleanup script can be useful (see below) | | And no, probably not, consider this: | | Kernel has lots of modules, you're dfinitely not goin to use all of them, | you cannot split all the modules one by one. Applying this rule, you cannot | do this to the packages. On a certain level they must be split (e.g. main | and -devel) but when it comes to individual programs, it's not always a | good idea. In kernel case, I suggest that after-install script (KDE/Gnome-based program?) can make clean-up. For all not-used modules. (I have notebook, and there is no way how I can change my video card, sound card or CD-ROM/DVD-ROM; hot-swappable USB devices can be supported, but it's in USB module) Still, this doesn't solve problem with workplace replication. If you have 50 identical computers, it'll be rather stupid to install on all of them "full" kernel, then manually or with script delete unnecessary modules. -- Vadim Plessky http://kde2.newmail.ru (English) http://kde2.newmail.ru/index_rus.html (Russian) Do you have Arial font installed? Just test it! http://kde2.newmail.ru/font_test_arial.html
Re: [Cooker] LM 7.2 EXPERT-Minimal installation
Yo, On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 02:26:26PM +0300, Vadim Plessky wrote: On 26 ?? 2000 20:59, Geoffrey Lee wrote: |-sh-utils 1296k, util-linux 2142k |Is it possible to select from them some utils which are always needed, |and place the rest in separate package? System installer doesn't allow |to take them off. | | See below on the XF split. can you comment a little bit? I don't see in your mail something related to this in XF section. Well say, the XF stuff is huge, there may (or may not) be some programs which you don't use, or libraires that you might not really need, but we cannot cater for all users, say, way have lots of users, user A may say, ok we need feature foo and bar, but user B say, I need feature foo only, and user C say I need foo and bar and baz, but I want to exclude feature blah , etc ... xterm and aterm are much-much smaller then tcl or tk which are present by default. same kind of after-install cleanup script can be useful (see below) | | And no, probably not, consider this: | | Kernel has lots of modules, you're dfinitely not goin to use all of them, | you cannot split all the modules one by one. Applying this rule, you cannot | do this to the packages. On a certain level they must be split (e.g. main | and -devel) but when it comes to individual programs, it's not always a | good idea. In kernel case, I suggest that after-install script (KDE/Gnome-based program?) can make clean-up. For all not-used modules. (I have notebook, and there is no way how I can change my video card, sound card or CD-ROM/DVD-ROM; hot-swappable USB devices can be supported, but it's in USB module) Still, this doesn't solve problem with workplace replication. If you have 50 identical computers, it'll be rather stupid to install on all of them "full" kernel, then manually or with script delete unnecessary modules. Oh you are goingt o have lots of troubles if you want to delete the modules manually. Think of the rpm error messages on kernel upgrade. Perhaps, I have not quoted a very good example, in kernel case, if you want minimal compile your own. -- Geoffrey Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] §õªø· ~/.signature ¤¤¤åbig5 compliant (You can't see it thanks to new glibc. :p) http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~snailtalk ftp://devel.mandrakesoft.com/pub/people/snailtalk "Seven days in a honeymoon makes one whole week."
[Cooker] Maestro3
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to liste.ps as well. Hi, For those of you who has maestro3 based sound card and want to play some music can downloaded these rpm : ftp://ftp.chmouel.org/pub/people/chmou/kernel/maestro3/maestro3-04112000-1mdk.i686.rpm it's compiled again kernel kernel-2.2.17-21mdk (default mandrake kernel), if you have another kernel you can simply rpm --rebuild the src.rpm. Notice nicely that it's not supported by me. (but works). -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org --Chmouel
Re: [Cooker] kaiman... is this *supposed* to do something?
Yep , I've got the upgrade that was compiled by Chris and it work well ;-) On Monday 27 November 2000 12:41, you wrote: I got the latest kdemultimedia source tarball and compiled it myself. Doesn't that count as upgrading it? You've to upgrade it to got it work... On Monday 27 November 2000 02:32, you wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey there... Question: has anyone (using mandrake) gotten kaiman to do anything? On the multimedia menu there is an entry for KDE Multimedia player. Selecting this menu entry does nothing. I note that the menu entry points to kaiman. Sound otherwise works on my system. I note that the file association for mp3 files points to kaiman. Clicking on an mp3 file does nothing. Using xmms to open an mp3 works fine. Running kaiman on the commandline results in: Skipped one element '49' Skipped one element '50' Preset_1_Button not handled yet. Ignoring style element Preset_1_Button Preset_2_Button not handled yet. Ignoring style element Preset_2_Button Preset_3_Button not handled yet. Ignoring style element Preset_3_Button Preset_4_Button not handled yet. Ignoring style element Preset_4_Button Preset_5_Button not handled yet. Ignoring style element Preset_5_Button Preset_6_Button not handled yet. Ignoring style element Preset_6_Button Found 24 elements. and then it just sits there and does nothing. I got the source for kdemultimedia, compiled kaiman and running the resulting binary gives the same messages. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.0 iQA/AwUBOiGrjAhKySqSS+rVEQJnIgCgxH0gGrTjNutURSj/s0Jc0/WHargAoOcJ 2/Gv3aq4qxfgEEWVE9YFJXl9 =eHHN -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Cooker] Maestro3
Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to liste.ps as well. Hi, For those of you who has maestro3 based sound card and want to play some music can downloaded these rpm : ftp://ftp.chmouel.org/pub/people/chmou/kernel/maestro3/maestro3-04112000-1mdk.i686.rpm FYI you may need to install with --force to have erase the old ac97 module, you can do like this from the command line : -$ rpm -ivh --force ftp://ftp.chmouel.org/pub/people/chmou/kernel/maestro3/maestro3-04112000-1mdk.i686.rpm -$ service start sound -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org --Chmouel
[Cooker] Bonobo upgrade breaks Evolution
Hey all! Upgrade to bonobo-0.28, oaf-6.1 and GConf-0.11 breaks evolution. Actualy evolution starts up ok and calendar as wall as address book are useable but when comes time to check your mail, that's where it all crashes... I first tried to re-compile evolution with libbonobo2-devel-0.28 but lots of errors due to functions prototypes discrepancies in the new Bonobo.h. So I downgraded to libbonobo1-devel-0.23 ***which by the way had to be done with --nodeps because it conplained it did not have bonobo-0.23 and for that reason should either be fixed or removed from cooker*** The downgrade to libbonobo-0.23 allowed a succesful compilation but the problem started on linking and I get the following: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lstdc++ collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Any idea??? Please Hellp! Thanks, Patrick PS: I have those packages installed: libbonobo2-0.28-1mdk bonobo-0.28-1mdk libbonobo1-devel-0.23-5mdk libbonobo1-0.23-5mdk liboaf0-0.6.1-1mdk liboaf0-devel-0.6.1-1mdk libGConf1-0.11-1mdk GConf-0.11-1mdk libGConf1-devel-0.11-1mdk libGConf0-0.8-4mdk libstdc++-2.96-0.18mdk libstdc++-compat-2.95.2-12mdk libstdc++-devel-2.96-0.18mdk
Re: [Cooker] Bonobo upgrade breaks Evolution
Yo, On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 11:50:22AM -0500, Patrick Poncet wrote: Hey all! Upgrade to bonobo-0.28, oaf-6.1 and GConf-0.11 breaks evolution. Actualy evolution starts up ok and calendar as wall as address book are useable but when comes time to check your mail, that's where it all crashes... I first tried to re-compile evolution with libbonobo2-devel-0.28 but lots of errors due to functions prototypes discrepancies in the new Bonobo.h. So I downgraded to libbonobo1-devel-0.23 ***which by the way had to be done with --nodeps because it conplained it did not have bonobo-0.23 and for that reason should either be fixed or removed from cooker*** I am not a gnome expert but I remember some problems with bonobo / Evolution but I don't know if it has been fixed or not. The downgrade to libbonobo-0.23 allowed a succesful compilation but the problem started on linking and I get the following: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lstdc++ collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Your libstdc++devel is possibly broke, try and fix it. Any idea??? Please Hellp! Thanks, Patrick PS: I have those packages installed: libbonobo2-0.28-1mdk bonobo-0.28-1mdk libbonobo1-devel-0.23-5mdk libbonobo1-0.23-5mdk liboaf0-0.6.1-1mdk liboaf0-devel-0.6.1-1mdk libGConf1-0.11-1mdk GConf-0.11-1mdk libGConf1-devel-0.11-1mdk libGConf0-0.8-4mdk libstdc++-2.96-0.18mdk libstdc++-compat-2.95.2-12mdk libstdc++-devel-2.96-0.18mdk -- Geoffrey Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] §õªø· ~/.signature ¤¤¤åbig5 compliant (You can't see it thanks to new glibc. :p) http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~snailtalk ftp://devel.mandrakesoft.com/pub/people/snailtalk "Seven days in a honeymoon makes one whole week."
Re: [Cooker] dependancy problems with gettext-devel
Geoffrey Lee wrote: Yo, On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 02:22:08PM +, Richard -Gilligan- Uschold wrote: > > Geoffrey Lee wrote: > > > Yo, > > > > On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 02:28:19PM +, Richard -Gilligan- Uschold wrote: > > > So, I downloaded: gettext-devel-0.10.35-17mdk-i586.rpm, but that has > > > dependencies: rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) and > > > rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) > > > > > > rpmfind.net has nothing for "rpmlib" , neither does the mandrake cooker > > > site. Any clue where I can get this? > > > > > > > What rpm do you have? > > my rpm is 3.0.3-43mdk > I also have: > gnorpm-0.9-4mdk > rpmdrake-0.9-7mdk > rpmtools-1.0-7mdk > grpmi-0.9-12mdk > gurpmi-0.4-38mdk > urpmi-0.9-38mdk > > I downloaded rpm-4.0-8mdk and rpm-devel-4.0-8mdk, but neither had the above > dependencies, so I haven't installed them. > Your rpm is old, install rpm 4.0 , if you have glibc 2.2 or rpm 3.0.5 if you have glibc 2.1.3 ... I mean for binary because that's what it was compiled against. Install them and see your problem magically go away. > -- Geoffrey Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]> ~/.signature big5 compliant (You can't see it thanks to new glibc. :p) http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~snailtalk ftp://devel.mandrakesoft.com/pub/people/snailtalk "Seven days in a honeymoon makes one whole week." I downloaded and installed rpm-3.0.5-27mdk.i586.rpm and rpm-devel3.0.5-27mdk.i586.rpm, but gettext-devel-0.10.35-17mdk.i586.rpm still had the above unsatisfied dependencies. I noticed that I had gettext-0.10.35-16mdk installed, so I got gettext-0.10.35-17mdk.i586.rpm and noticed that this also had the dependencies above. Then I guessed that -16mdk might not have the dependencies, so I got gettext-devel-0.10.35-16mdk.i586.rpm and installed it, no dependency problems! This still does not tell me where to get the above rbmlib dependency. -- Gilligan | __o .oooO /| _ \,_ ( ) /p|\ (_)/ (_) \ ( Oooo. / | \ \_) ( ) ) / [EMAIL PROTECTED] (_/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Cooker] Drakfont broken in cooker
I used drakfont to install the four courier-new fonts from my Windows directory. What I got was: altsys-CodexSSK-medium-r-normal Bitstream-CloisterBlack BT-medium-r-normal urw-CityDMed-medium-r-normal urw-CityDLig-medium-r-normal [12:42 root@penguin:~]# ls /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/drakfont c010012d.ttf c010014d.ttf codexssk.ttf fonts.dir tt0757m_.ttf If I select a font from the listbox to install or remove, the action is performed on a different font. If I install all, a font called (null) is installed and I get the following message: Gdk-WARNING **: Creating pixmap with NULL window and colormap. -- Peter Ruskin, Wrexham, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED] Preferred desktop environment KDE 1.1.2 Linux 2.2.17-27mdk, Uptime 0 hours 33 minutes
[Cooker] mkbootdisk-1.2.7-2mdk broken on cooker
[11:27 root@penguin:~]# mkbootdisk --device /dev/fd0 2.2.17-28mdk Insert a disk in /dev/fd0. Any information on the disk will be lost. Press Enter to continue or ^C to abort: mke2fs 1.19, 13-Jul-2000 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09 usage: lilo [ -C config_file ] -q [ -m map_file ] [ -v ... ] lilo [ -C config_file ] [ -b boot_device ] [ -c ] [ -l | -L ] [ -i boot_loader ] [ -m map_file ] [ -d delay ] [ -v ... ] [ -t ] [ -s save_file | -S save_file ] [ -P fix | -P ignore ] [ -r root_dir ] [ -w ] lilo [ -C config_file ] [ -m map_file ] -R [ word ... ] lilo [ -C config_file ] -I name [ options ] lilo [ -C config_file ] [ -s save_file ] -u | -U [ boot_device ] lilo -T help (to see a list of options) lilo -V The result is not a bootable disk. There seems to be something wrong with the way lilo is called. -- Peter Ruskin, Wrexham, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED] Preferred desktop environment KDE 1.1.2 Linux 2.2.17-27mdk, Uptime 0 hours 58 minutes
[Cooker] update proposal: gnome-vfs
Here's an update for gnome-vfs. In the previous release I forgot (Stefan sux!) to fix a BuildRequires and one Requires statement. This should fix it and let it install. Please merge with cooker. TIA, Stefan http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/gnome-vfs-0.4.2-4mdk.src.rpm http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/gnome-vfs.spec http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/gnome-vfs.spec.diff http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/gnome-vfs.spec.orig
[Cooker] dependancy problem: eog
Hi,
eog no longer wants to rebuild:
error: failed build dependencies:
GConf-devel = 0.8 is needed by eog-0.5-2mdk
Installing /mirrors/SRPMS/eog-0.5-2mdk.src.rpm
The .spec file needs to be modified, perhaps like so:
--- eog.spec.orig Mon Nov 27 20:09:54 2000
+++ eog.specMon Nov 27 20:11:09 2000
@@ -23,9 +23,9 @@
Requires: oaf
Requires: gnome-print = 0.24
Requires: libglade
-Requires: GConf = 0.8
+Requires: GConf = 0.11
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-buildroot
-BuildRequires: GConf-devel = 0.8
+BuildRequires: libGConf1-devel = 0.11
BuildRequires: gdk-pixbuf-devel XFree86-devel gnome-libs-devel
audiofile-devel
esound-devel imlib-devel
BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel libpng-devel libtiff-devel zlib-devel
BuildRequires: gnome-print = 0.24
This fixes the dependancy problem, but the package won't build:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..
-I/usr/include-I/usr/include/gnome-xml
-I/usr/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include
-DNEED_GNOMESUPPORT_H
-I/usr/lib/gnome-libs/include
-I/usr/include/gconf/1 -I/usr/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include
-I/usr/X11R6/include
-DEOG_GLADEDIR=\""/usr/share/eog/glade"\"
-DGNOMELOCALEDIR=\""/usr/share/locale"\" -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"eog\"
-O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -march=i586 -ffast-math
-Wall -Wunused -c main.c
main.c: In function `main':
main.c:49: warning: passing arg 3 of `gconf_init' from incompatible
pointer typemain.c:51: request for member `str' in something not a
structure or union
main.c:52: warning: implicit declaration of function
`gconf_error_destroy'
make[3]: *** [main.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/users/stefan/RPM/BUILD/eog-0.5/src'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/users/stefan/RPM/BUILD/eog-0.5/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/users/stefan/RPM/BUILD/eog-0.5'
make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
Bad exit status from /users/stefan/tmp/rpm-tmp.8001 (%build)
Note that this program has been labeled "unstable" on the gnome
ftp-site.
Stefan
Re: [Cooker] Maestro3
Thanks. This works perfectly on the HP N5195 laptop with kernel 2.2.17-21mdk installed. harddrake does not regognize the new driver though. -Chris On Monday 27 November 2000 10:59, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to liste.ps as well. Hi, For those of you who has maestro3 based sound card and want to play some music can downloaded these rpm : ftp://ftp.chmouel.org/pub/people/chmou/kernel/maestro3/maestro3-04112000- 1mdk.i686.rpm FYI you may need to install with --force to have erase the old ac97 module, you can do like this from the command line : -$ rpm -ivh --force ftp://ftp.chmouel.org/pub/people/chmou/kernel/maestro3/maestro3-04112000-1m dk.i686.rpm -$ service start sound
Re: [Cooker] Bonobo upgrade breaks Evolution
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geoffrey Lee) writes: Yo, On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 11:50:22AM -0500, Patrick Poncet wrote: Hey all! Upgrade to bonobo-0.28, oaf-6.1 and GConf-0.11 breaks evolution. Actualy evolution starts up ok and calendar as wall as address book are useable but when comes time to check your mail, that's where it all crashes... I first tried to re-compile evolution with libbonobo2-devel-0.28 but lots of errors due to functions prototypes discrepancies in the new Bonobo.h. So I downgraded to libbonobo1-devel-0.23 ***which by the way had to be done with --nodeps because it conplained it did not have bonobo-0.23 and for that reason should either be fixed or removed from cooker*** I am not a gnome expert but I remember some problems with bonobo / Evolution but I don't know if it has been fixed or not. I'm currently grabbing patches from Gnome CVS to be able to compile Evolution with bonobo 0.28.. -- Frédéric Crozat MandrakeSoft
Re: [Cooker] HELP: Macmillan's packaging a pre-release of Mandrake 7.2
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 08:28:20PM +1100, Ron Stodden wrote: "Charles R. Hurley" wrote: Macmillan/Mandrake calls the box I brought: Linux-Mandrake 7.2 Powerpack Deluxe. Again, how can I tell if this is a pre-release? Look at contents of the i586/VERSION file on the first CD. The real 7.2 is identified as: Linux-Mandrake Odyssey-i586 20001027 15:20 what's the implications of Linux-Mandrake Odyssey-i586 20001011 16:42 should i be glad or dismayed ?? srp
Re: [Cooker] mkbootdisk-1.2.7-2mdk broken on cooker
Peter Ruskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [11:27 root@penguin:~]# mkbootdisk --device /dev/fd0 2.2.17-28mdk Insert a disk in /dev/fd0. Any information on the disk will be lost. Press Enter to continue or ^C to abort: mke2fs 1.19, 13-Jul-2000 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09 usage: lilo [ -C config_file ] -q [ -m map_file ] [ -v ... ] lilo [ -C config_file ] [ -b boot_device ] [ -c ] [ -l | -L ] [ -i boot_loader ] [ -m map_file ] [ -d delay ] [ -v ... ] [ -t ] [ -s save_file | -S save_file ] [ -P fix | -P ignore ] [ -r root_dir ] [ -w ] lilo [ -C config_file ] [ -m map_file ] -R [ word ... ] lilo [ -C config_file ] -I name [ options ] lilo [ -C config_file ] [ -s save_file ] -u | -U [ boot_device ] lilo -T help (to see a list of options) lilo -V The result is not a bootable disk. There seems to be something wrong with the way lilo is called. upgrade to the last lilo.. -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org --Chmouel
[Cooker] update proposal: kernel-2.2
Hi, Here's an update proposal for the kernel-2.2 package. This update refreshes the .config files for the alpha platform, which allows the kernel to compile on that platform. If possible, please merge with cooker. If there is no interest in this fix, please notify me (and I'll stop bothering you lot with it ;-) ). TIA, Stefan http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/kernel-2.2.17-30mdk.src.rpm http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/kernel-2.2.17-alpha-secure.config http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/kernel-2.2.17-alpha-smp.config http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/kernel-2.2.17-alpha.config http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/kernel-2.2.spec.diff http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/kernel-2.2.spec http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/kernel-2.2.spec.orig
[Cooker] Problems with dd
I have noted that the "count=" and "seek=" options on dd seem to give errors in cases when one has devfs on. I checked permissions but still I don't get the origin of the error. The problem happens the following way: you give a dd with a count=#. The stuff gets written on the floppy. However when doing dd with a "seek", the systems gives "/dev/ permission denied". This happens either by calling /dev/fd0 symlinks or calling directly /dev/floppy/0. I tried to give full permissions even as root and the thing doesn't come up. However if I try to concatenate both files and do a dd with resulting file, everything gets writen on the floppy. I checked this with two floppies, new ones, overchecked for anything "bad". The commands I gave work well on a "classical" /dev system... Ektanoor
Re: [Cooker] openuniverse - KILLS!!!
Pedro Rosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What a Hell of a program! I even forgot to go home for dinner... Ok who's the joker that put this killer app on cooker? This way you don't kill Windows. You kill your own work... yeep. I discovered it reading some news story on 3d Linux, then I put it on Cooker, then I discovered that it was on Contribs for some time! :-/ But sure it's really cute and nice.. -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
[Cooker] MandrakeUpdate rpm size is wrong (BUG)
i ordered rpm packages from develpment option from rpmfind ftp and the size of glibc was 27.8Mb and the real size is 9235809 Nov 26 13:15 glibc-devel-2.2-11mdk.i586.rpm other packages have the same problem, size is reported with wrong value. Any one having, this problem too. thks Lafa -- Luis Antonio Ferreira Alves LESI www.di.uminho.pt email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 5061305
Re: [Cooker] HELP: Macmillan's packaging a pre-release of Mandrake 7.2
On Mon Nov 27, 2000 at 08:28:20PM +1100, Ron Stodden wrote: Macmillan/Mandrake calls the box I brought: Linux-Mandrake 7.2 Powerpack Deluxe. Again, how can I tell if this is a pre-release? Look at contents of the i586/VERSION file on the first CD. The real 7.2 is identified as: Linux-Mandrake Odyssey-i586 20001027 15:20 Actually, this is the 7.2+updates download edition... the real 7.2 is dated 20001011 or something similar. The powerpack he bought is the real version as advertised. Please let's not start this whole thread over again... Macmillan never released a "pre-release" 7.2 and that is that. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED], OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net 1024D/FE6F2AFD 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7 66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD - Danen Consulting Serviceswww.danen.net, www.freezer-burn.org - MandrakeSoft, Inc. www.linux-mandrake.com Current Linux uptime: 2 days 22 hours 1 minutes.
Re: [Cooker] mkbootdisk-1.2.7-2mdk broken on cooker
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 09:09:51PM +0100, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: [11:27 root@penguin:~]# mkbootdisk --device /dev/fd0 2.2.17-28mdk Insert a disk in /dev/fd0. Any information on the disk will be lost. Press Enter to continue or ^C to abort: mke2fs 1.19, 13-Jul-2000 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09 usage: lilo [ -C config_file ] -q [ -m map_file ] [ -v ... ] lilo [ -C config_file ] [ -b boot_device ] [ -c ] [ -l | -L ] [ -i boot_loader ] [ -m map_file ] [ -d delay ] [ -v ... ] [ -t ] [ -s save_file | -S save_file ] [ -P fix | -P ignore ] [ -r root_dir ] [ -w ] lilo [ -C config_file ] [ -m map_file ] -R [ word ... ] lilo [ -C config_file ] -I name [ options ] lilo [ -C config_file ] [ -s save_file ] -u | -U [ boot_device ] lilo -T help (to see a list of options) lilo -V The result is not a bootable disk. There seems to be something wrong with the way lilo is called. upgrade to the last lilo.. Why not to add "Requires" or "Conflicts" tag about lilo requirements? :) It would help various automated tools to do proper package upgrades. Regards, Dmitry +-+ Dmitry V. Levin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Engineer PGP pubkey http://www.fandra.org/users/ldv/pgpkeys.html IPLabs Linux Team http://linux.iplabs.ru Fandra Project http://www.fandra.org +-+ UNIX is user friendly. It's just very selective about who it's friends are. PGP signature
Re: [Cooker] HELP: Macmillan's packaging a pre-release of Mandrake 7.2
On Mon Nov 27, 2000 at 07:28:33PM +, stephen wrote: Macmillan/Mandrake calls the box I brought: Linux-Mandrake 7.2 Powerpack Deluxe. Again, how can I tell if this is a pre-release? Look at contents of the i586/VERSION file on the first CD. The real 7.2 is identified as: Linux-Mandrake Odyssey-i586 20001027 15:20 what's the implications of Linux-Mandrake Odyssey-i586 20001011 16:42 should i be glad or dismayed ?? Be glad. =) It's the real Mandrake 7.2. All you need to do now is fire up MandrakeUpdate, download and install the upgrades it will find for you (*not* development updates but normal updates!) and you will effectively have what Ron mistakenly called the "real 7.2" and is in fact 7.2 (what you have) plus updates (what you will have once MandrakeUpdate is completed upgrading packages). -- [EMAIL PROTECTED], OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net 1024D/FE6F2AFD 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7 66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD - Danen Consulting Serviceswww.danen.net, www.freezer-burn.org - MandrakeSoft, Inc. www.linux-mandrake.com Current Linux uptime: 2 days 22 hours 2 minutes.
[Cooker] openuniverse - KILLS!!!
What a Hell of a program! I even forgot to go home for dinner... Ok who's the joker that put this killer app on cooker? This way you don't kill Windows. You kill your own work... Ektanoor
Re: [Cooker] HELP: Macmillan's packaging a pre-release of Mandrake 7.2
"Charles R. Hurley" wrote: Macmillan/Mandrake calls the box I brought: Linux-Mandrake 7.2 Powerpack Deluxe. Again, how can I tell if this is a pre-release? Correction to my initial reply: Look at contents of the i586/VERSION file. The real 7.2 is identified as: from tree download: Linux-Mandrake Odyssey-i586 20001027 15:20 or from iso images download: Linux-Mandrake Download Edition Odyssey-i586 20001027 15:47 -- Regards, Ron. [AU]
Re: [Cooker] HELP: Macmillan's packaging a pre-release of Mandrake 7.2
I live in the US, and it seems rumor has it I brought a pre-release copy of Mandrake 7.2 from Macmillan. Well I did buy a Macmillan copy, but can someone please tell me how can I find out if this 7.2 copy is a true pre-release? easy check ls /mandrake/RPMS/kde* if the kde rpms are 199 then you have a prerelease REGISTER YOUR COPY NOW AND CHECK THE SEND PATCH DISC thing at the very bottom (btw imn still waiting for my disc) Robert L Martin
[Cooker] USB cpia video cam modules for 7.2?
USB cpia video cam modules for 7.2? The source is here: http://sourceforge.net/project/filelist.php?group_id=3159 A brief description of an install is here: http://www.linuxnewbie.org/nhf/intel/hardware/usbcreativevideoblaster.html This guy does use the 2.3 kernel, however. Has anyone compiled the cpia_usb.o and cpia.o modules for the 2.2.17-21mdk kernel from Mandrake 7.2? I can get the cpia.o and cpia_pp.o (parallel port) modules to compile, but not the USB module which is the one I need. The web cam I am attempting to use, an Ezonic EZcam is on sale at Best Buy for US$20, and is on the "supported" list. Any help, suggestions or ideas? Hoyt
Re: [Cooker] HELP: Macmillan's packaging a pre-release of Mandrake 7.2
Vincent Danen wrote: Please let's not start this whole thread over again... Macmillan never released a "pre-release" 7.2 and that is that. Í'm sorry, but you are misinformed. The first release of the real 7.2 was to downloaders on November 2 and was build version-dated October 27. This is the first 7.2 that was not specifically branded a 'release candidate'. It is this release that was the subject of the various release announcements made around Novenber 2 by Mandrake. Walmart and Macmillan were selling something erroneously labelled Mandrake 7.2, with a build version-date of October 12 or 15 before November 2. Them's the facts. So that is that! -- Regards, Ron. [AU]
Re: [Cooker] mdk 7.2 running IE 5, kind of
- Original Message - From: "Leon Brooks" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2000 1:39 AM Subject: Re: [Cooker] mdk 7.2 running IE 5, kind of Win4lin is it opensource? No. Or at least, not yet. Probably won't be, but it would be nice if the Mandrake folks included the Win4Lin hooks in the Mandrake kernel. I've tried to get both parties talking, but no luck. For using Windows apps in a Linux business environment, Win4Lin seems superior to VMware (and likely Plex86) due to the way it is structured. Cheaper, too. It would be nice for Mandrake to provide Win4Lin support "out-of-the-box". Hoyt
Re: [Cooker] Konqueror ftp bug.
- Original Message - From: "Ron Stodden" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Mandrake Cooker" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 24, 2000 7:43 PM Subject: [Cooker] Konqueror ftp bug. My count of big problems with 7.2 is now: 1. Cannot burn CDs. I have used mkisofs and cdrecord successfully here in 7.2. What's the problem you encountered? Hoyt
Re: [Cooker] HELP: Macmillan's packaging a pre-release of Mandrake 7.2
You know, I love you tell a MandrakeSoft Employee he doesn't know what he is talking about...hahahaha -John Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 9:16 PM Subject: Re: [Cooker] HELP: Macmillan's packaging a pre-release of Mandrake 7.2 Vincent Danen wrote: Please let's not start this whole thread over again... Macmillan never released a "pre-release" 7.2 and that is that. Í'm sorry, but you are misinformed. The first release of the real 7.2 was to downloaders on November 2 and was build version-dated October 27. This is the first 7.2 that was not specifically branded a 'release candidate'. It is this release that was the subject of the various release announcements made around Novenber 2 by Mandrake. Walmart and Macmillan were selling something erroneously labelled Mandrake 7.2, with a build version-date of October 12 or 15 before November 2. Them's the facts. So that is that! -- Regards, Ron. [AU]
[Cooker] CVSweb mirror
Hi, For your information a cvsweb mirror has been setup on another machine which should be faster at : https://kenobi.mandrakesoft.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi Enjoy OpenSource development. -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org --Chmouel
Re: [Cooker] CVSweb mirror
from the quill of Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] on scroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] For your information a cvsweb mirror has been setup on another machine which should be faster Well now that you have announced it to the world it won't be. :-) You should have just sent me private mail. :-) at : https://kenobi.mandrakesoft.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi Enjoy OpenSource development. Thanks!! b. -- Brian J. Murrell
