[Elecraft] K3: antenna dependent transmit power

2016-01-30 Thread Jussi Eloranta

Hi,

Is there any way to set the transmit power level based on the antenna 
setting on K3 (i.e., ANT1 or ANT2)?
I have two  antennas (connected to ANT1 and ANT2) that have different 
maximum power limits
and would like to make sure that I don't fry anything when switching 
antennas. I know that this
is a per band setting but it would be great to have it antenna dependent 
as well.


Jussi Eloranta (AA6KJ)
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] K3 firmware updates under Linux/ARM?

2015-02-15 Thread Jussi Eloranta

Hi,

As the current Linux/Intel desktop at my station decided take its last 
breath, I am exploring the option of replacing it with an ARM based 
system; either Banana Pi (ARM based computer; about $45) or Raspberry 
Pi2 (about the same for $35). I have figured out everything else (dual 
monitor support, USB-RS232, logging programs etc.) but the only missing 
piece is to be able to update the firmware in my K3. The firmware update 
program is available only for Linux/Intel platforms and not for Linux/ARM.


Are there any plans to support Linux/ARM in the future? At this point it 
would be enough for me to hear that such support is planned.


Thanks,

Jussi Eloranta (AA6KJ)

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 firmware updates under Linux/ARM?

2015-02-15 Thread Jussi Eloranta

On 02/15/2015 09:19 PM, David Fleming via Elecraft wrote:

Let me try that again with fewer typos. Sometimes my typing outruns my brain.
It should be possible. I'm not sure how well a Qemu x86 VM would perform on a 
mini ARM rig like a Raspberry Pi or Beaglebone. Qemu can only run on one core. 
That is, it can emulate multiple CPUs, but it does this in a single thread, 
IIRC. And I suspect getting it up and running would be a challenge.  A better 
option might be Exagear Desktop. It is like Qemu but much faster. Like 4x 
faster. But it is not free ($30). Exagear Desktop on a Raspberry Pi 2 Model B 
should run 32-bit Linux x86 applications nicely (like the Elecraft Utilities). 
I figure Exagear is worth the money just for the performance advantage. It 
could be an awesome little system for around $75 (if you already have a HDMI 
monitor and a keyboard). I've been seriously considering ordering one just to 
play with.


I just tried to boot 32bit intel fedora 21 live image under ARM qemu (on 
banana pi). This is REALLY slow and even speeding up by a factor of 4 is 
not going to help much. I did not have enough patience to get the whole 
thing to boot up to the desktop, so I concluded that this will not work 
in practice.


It shouldn't be that difficult to cross-compile the K3 utility for ARM 
(unless they are using some strange development tools that don't support 
this). Since everything else works now, I will go the ARM way with my 
station. If I need to update the K3 firmware, I will visit someone with 
a PC. Hopefully Linux/ARM will be supported in the future.


Jussi (AA6KJ)

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] K3 VFO tuning noise on 10m RF gain

2012-12-18 Thread Jussi Eloranta

Hi,

I have a recent K3 (SN 6527, FW 4.51) and I see fairly strong VFO tuning 
noise on 10m.
More specifically this is centered around 28.004 MHz and spreads around 
for about +- 3 kHz.
With the preamp on this can reach S3 on the meter while tuning (well 
above the noise level with antenna on).
Not that it is going to prevent me from working there since it only 
comes while tuning but it is annoying.
There might also be other spots on the band but I work CW only, so the 
above is something I run into frequently.

Any ideas how to fix this?

Another small problem that I have is that the RF gain behaves in a bit 
unpredictable way when
turned all the way down. When I start turning it down, I see the normal 
behavior, the S-meter starts
going up. When I reach a position (about 10% of minimum), I see the 
S-meter drop down and
it seems like the RF gain is going up again. Is this a problem with RF 
gain calibration (googling around suggests this)?
And if it is, what could have caused it to go out of whack? (this was a 
factory assembled K3 that I bought

about 6 months ago). I probably need a signal source to recalibrate?

Other than these two issues, what a great radio! Really enjoying it!

Thanks,

Jussi Eloranta (AA6KJ)


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 VFO tuning noise

2012-12-18 Thread Jussi Eloranta

On 12/18/2012 12:11 PM, Bill Clarke wrote:
So - I got curious and tested my rig for the noise on ten meters. It 
is so faint that I had to use phones to be sure it was actually there. 
I agree with Phil, this will never bother me. Perhaps this varies from 
one rig to another?
On mine I can definitely hear it even with the band noise present (I 
always use phones and work with fairly weak signals lurking in the noise).
When browsing the band quickly, it is possible to miss a weak station 
because of this. I have a decent antenna hooked up to it - an inverted 
V, which
is abt 50 feet up from the center, so there is significant band noise 
present. I have the preamp on pretty much at all times on 10m.


I wonder if there are some factors in the assembly process that could 
affect this (routing of cables etc.) ?
I think I have also noticed that the amplitude of the tuning noise 
varies (not related to the noise level of the band) but
I still have to verify this observation (this could still be my 
imagination).


As for the question about the RF gain - I probably need to calibrate RF 
gain again. It would be great to know
how it got messed up - it could have been from the very beginning - I 
might have just missed it.


Jussi (AA6KJ)

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Windows vs Mac

2012-08-24 Thread Jussi Eloranta
On 08/24/2012 06:44 AM, Paul and Sue Huff wrote:
 BTW, I know that Linux is a popular operating system for ham radio these days
 but I don't really know anything about it.  I can certainly try to learn,
 however the computer has other uses in the family and so I would need to be 
 able
 to easily switch it back into it's standard manufacturers configuration for 
 my
 wife who is even less techie than I am.
You can grab a live image, put it on a USB stick and boot from there.
This way you can try it out without installing it on your hard drive.
You can even keep running it this way permanently but it would run
a bit slower than from hard drive.

The two most common distros are Fedora and Ubuntu. Info
on the live images can be found from:

http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/17/html/Installation_Quick_Start_Guide/index.html#Introduction
http://www.ubuntu.com/download/help/try-ubuntu-before-you-install

Ubuntu might be a bit user friendlier but Fedora is certainly more 
customizable. I believe both include hamlib that supports K2, K3/KX3 etc.

Jussi Eloranta (AA6KJ)

ps. Fedora ham radio guide is at: 
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/Amateur_Radio_Guide/index.html
 
but it is missing important things like cqrlog (which I use with my K3; 
see www.cqrlog.com). There is also a short intro for ubuntu for hams at 
http://www.arrl.org/ubuntu-linux-for-hams. Also a ham oriented spin off 
of ubuntu is available: 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/kb1oiq-andysham/; you might be able to 
run this off of a usb stick too.



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Firmware upgrades using Ubuntu 12.04

2012-07-10 Thread Jussi Eloranta


 Let me give one OT RANT, and then I will shut up on this subject.
 Suffice it to say that I have been extremely disappointing in all Linux
 distributions because of the lack of any organized support fort the users -
 the attitude seems to be if you don't already understand the nuances of
 Linux, we will shame your questions and be very unhelpful.
 Check out the various forums and FAQ lists to verify this attitude.

 I have tried Ubuntu, Linux Mint, and Debian in the recent past, and have
 found that unless you wish to spend a loot of time in geekdom study, the
 terms are cryptic and not logical acronyms, and  the user groups are useless
 unless one is already fluent in their brand of geek-speak.
 Yes, I am computer fluent in Windows and peer-to-peer networking - I have
 worked with PCs since the Apple II days and the IBM PC DOS systems are no
 stranger to me, but the Linux groups are just not helpful at all to those
 who do not understand their peculiar cryptic language.

 In other words, there are no clear and concise instructions for Linux.
 The Man pages are supposedly the answer, but they offer geek-speak
 explanations for those who are not initiated and expert into the Linux brand
 of geekdom.

 I know, there are many who will disagree, but you will have to point me to a
 (non-on-line) manual that I can use as a reference book and is similar to
 those like Mastering Windows XP Professional, Linux in any distro is just
 not going to make the grade.

 For those who simply want to do email and surf the web, Ubuntu is great, as
 is Linux Mint - it has all the tools those users need, but for those who
 want to do such things as network a Linux workstation into a Windows peer to
 peer network, there is just not enough explicit information about how to set
 it up and make it work. Windows peer-to-peer is native, but with Linux, it
 is a complex add-on that I have not been able to master after several
 attempts with Samba configuration.

I don't think these quite belong to the Elecraft list but since this 
already took off...

If you can't understand how computers work, use what ever you can. Linux 
(and Unix in general) is superior to anything made my microsoft pretty 
much from every aspect. Talking about these two at the same time is like 
comparing ham radio and CB.

Just my $.02,

Jussi Eloranta (AA6KJ)

ps. BTW Setting up samba is trivial - takes about 3 minutes. There are 
many step by step instructions on the net.


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Firmware upgrades using Ubuntu 12.04

2012-07-07 Thread Jussi Eloranta
On 07/07/2012 09:56 AM, Brian Alsop wrote:
 I found these two additional steps are necessary before the Utility program
 will successfully operate:

 (Run in a terminal)

sudo chmod 666 /dev/ttyUSB0

sudo apt-get install curl


Rather than changing the device permissions (which you have to do every 
time you boot or unplug/plug the usb serial device),
you should add yourself to the dialout group:

sudo usermod -G dialout your_username

where your_username should be replaced with your username on the 
system. The above will execute as root, so you need to have sudo 
permissions. There is probably some GUI based tool for this but command 
line is simpler ;-) After doing this, you will need to logout and login 
again. You can verify that you have the correct group privs with the id 
command, for example, for me it says:

uid=500(eloranta) gid=500(eloranta) 
groups=500(eloranta),18(dialout),39(video),489(pulse-access),490(pulse),493(jackuser)

where 18(dialout) is the important part.

As for curl, I think the utility program should check for its existence 
during startup and appropriately tell the user to install it before 
proceeding.

Jussi Eloranta (AA6KJ)

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Firmware upgrades using Ubuntu 12.04

2012-07-07 Thread Jussi Eloranta
On 07/07/2012 06:36 PM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
 * On 2012 07 Jul 16:38 -0500, Adrian wrote:
   
 I am very naughty here and run as root all the time now in fedora 17
 (started on centOS 5 and fedora 10),  so permissions are not an issue.

 Have been doing that for 6 years and yet to have an issue.
 Until someone tells you to:

 cd /
 rm -rf *

 Have a nice day!

While you might not type that in, there might be an ill behaving program 
(on purpose or a bug) that could do something like that. Or simply you 
open up a tar archive or something and that might overwrite important 
files etc. I would strongly advise against running everything as root.

Jussi Eloranta (AA6KJ)

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] power line question

2012-06-24 Thread Jussi Eloranta
Hi,

This is not directly related to Elecraft but it does have implications 
on the use of my K3 ;-)

I live in one of those cursed properties that have overhead power 
lines in the backyard (from the service pole; the pole itself is in the 
neighbors yard, at least...) and you may guess that this does not mix 
well with antennas. Right now I am very limited putting anything decent 
up without serous safety concerns. Does anyone have any experience in 
burying the overhead cables (from the service pole to the house) 
underground in So Cal, serviced by Southern California Edison? How 
expensive would such an operation be?

Thanks,

Jussi Eloranta, AA6KJ

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] power line question

2012-06-24 Thread Jussi Eloranta
On 06/24/2012 07:26 PM, Jim Wiley wrote:
 Some years back, I was facing a similar issue.  I contacted the 
 electric utility, they suggested I contact one of their approved 
 suppliers (a local electrical contractor), and go from there. Short 
 story: They got it done is about a week, and the cost (then) was about 
 $300.   Most electric utility companies have a list of approved 
 contractors that they use, primarily for new construction.  The 
 utility service department normally does not have the personnel for 
 new construction work (there is too much of it) and usually comes into 
 play for repair work only.
OK, thanks. I will check with a local contractor.

Yeah, I know that some folks already got frustrated this being off 
topic but I did not have anyone else to turn to. If anyone else has 
good suggestions, email me directly to keep the list traffic minimum.

Thanks,

Jussi Eloranta, AA6KJ

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] k3util editing CW memories (linux)

2012-06-11 Thread Jussi Eloranta
Hi David,

On 06/11/2012 07:15 AM, David Fleming wrote:

 This is most likely a bug.  I thought this was fixed some time ago. 
 I'll look into it. Try programming a shorter message in the memory and 
 see if  it still drops any characters.

It does not drop characters with shorter strings. Thank you for looking 
into this,

Jussi Eloranta (AA6KJ)


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] k3util editing CW memories (linux)

2012-06-10 Thread Jussi Eloranta
Hi,

I am having problems with the k3util program  programming CW memories 
on linux. I have programmed Bank 1/M1 by keying with a paddle as:

CQ CQ CQ DE AA6KJ AA6KJ AA6KJ CQ CQ CQ DE AA6KJ AA6KJ AA6KJ K

Then I enter k3util and use Edit CW memories and I see Bank1/M1 as:

CQ CQ CQ DE AA6KJ AA6KJ AA6KJ CQ CQ CQ DE AA6KJ AA6KJ AA6K   K

Note that J is missing from the last occurrence of my call sign. This 
happens consistently every time.
If I save the memory at this point by clicking on save then I really 
have a missing J in the K3 memory as well.

This is not specific to using M1 or the string length. I see the same 
behavior with M2 with:

CQ CQ DX DX DE AA6KJ AA6KJ AA6KJ CQ CQ DX DX DE AA6KJ AA6K  AA6KJ K

Now the J is missing from the second last occurrence of my call sign. If 
I use a really short string, for example, just my call sign once, there 
is no problem.

I though that this might be an rs232 transfer issue so I tried lowering 
the transfer rate down to 9600 (from 38400)
but no change. I am using a usb based rs232 adapter and K3util version 
1.12.3.28. Also, everything else seems to be working just fine (test 
communications and other functions).

Any clues what is going on?

Thanks,

Jussi Eloranta (AA6KJ)

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] k3util editing CW memories (linux)

2012-06-10 Thread Jussi Eloranta
On 06/10/2012 10:19 PM, Adrian wrote:
 Just type in the fields in K3Util what you want to send via cw.

 Using a key or paddle to set is not necessary.

It does not help. If I enter it once from the keyboard correctly and then
check back again, it will show the missing letter problem. Thus I can
set the memories OK (with k3util) but I cannot edit them properly.

Jussi Eloranta (AA6KJ)

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] OT: Distinguishable angular momentum in radio photons?

2012-05-05 Thread Jussi Eloranta
On 05/04/2012 10:03 PM, Erik Basilier wrote:
 * The claim was not just that you can have two independent communications
 (as possible by means of circular polarization), but more than two.
 * The claim of multiple levels of angular momentum tells us that it is about
 OAM and not SAM. The abstract of the debunking research (thanks Sverre for
 posting) explicitly refers to OAM.
Indeed photons can posses orbital angular momentum which can only 
interact with materials that have fairly special anisotropic properties 
(which is the reason I was not even bringing it up earlier). In order to 
talk to the oam component, one should subject RF photons to propagate in 
such medium as well. While possible in theory (and shown in optics using 
an obscure version of a halve wave plate), it would be a real 
challenge to observe this for RF where such materials are not available 
(someone correct me if I am wrong, I mostly work with optics).

However, an interesting topic and well worth looking into! I wonder if 
photon orbital angular momentum would be conserved in a non-linear 
process where the difference and sum generation occurs (usually just the 
sum is used, for example in second harmonic generation; similar to RF 
heterodyning) and the difference component would lie in RF (OK, perhaps 
in GHz range in practice...; near baseband anyway ;-)? So the idea would 
be to start with optical photons (prepared with oam information) at 
close wavelengths and then convert to RF (RF wavelength = difference 
between the two optical photons; angular momentum must be conserved). 
Unfortunately, this would not work for detection that well because high 
intensities are needed for the non-linear process. I would expect that 
the first place where this would show up (if possible at all) for RF 
would be nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments where I could see 
that the extra source of angular momentum could find applications there.

I suspect that most people are getting bored already - so I will sign 
off...

Best,

Jussi Eloranta
AA6KJ

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] OT: Distinguishable angular momentum in radio photons?

2012-05-04 Thread Jussi Eloranta
On 05/03/2012 10:10 PM, Erik Basilier wrote:
 The May 2012 issue of the IEEE Spectrum magazine reports that researchers in
 Italy and Sweden were able to conduct two separate instances of radio
 communication on the exact same frequency, without increasing bandwidth, and
 without time-division multiplexing, be making the transmissions differ in
 angular momentum. One transmission used linear polarization, and the other
 was given angular momentum by means of a dish with a radial cut, where the
 metal  was bent backwards/forwards on the two sides of the cut. Apparently
 this is not just a case of linear vs circular polarization, as circular
 polarization can be readily picked up by a linearly polarized antenna, and
 apparently the two channels did not interfere with each other. The
 researchers claim that this demonstration points to the possibility that the
 radio photons can be given multiple, quanized levels of angular momentum,
 making possible several more communication channels without increased
 bandwidth. Other researchers say that this is just a form of MIMO. Wikipedia
 describes MIMO as the technique of using multiple antennas as in diversity
 reception or in gain increases obtained by phasing the antennas.

The only source of angular momentum in a photon is its intrinsic spin ( 
= 1). This can have two projections, +1 and -1 (only two, unlike for 
most spin one particles, which have three possible projections). 
However, these two projections are directly related to the left and 
right circularly polarized light, so I cannot quite see what other 
source of angular momentum could arise in this case? Having said this, I 
don't quite believe in the Swedish group explanation of this experiment.

Jussi Eloranta
AA6KJ

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] looking for a open source waterfall/pabadepter display for the KX3. any ideas

2012-04-25 Thread Jussi Eloranta
Hi,

  looking for a open source waterfall/pabadepter display for the KX3. 
any ideas

Haven't gotten my kx3 yet so can't say for sure that the following will 
work but most likely:

- quisk (win/linux/mac; http://james.ahlstrom.name/quisk/; not sure if 
rig control works). It takes general I/Q in and can make the waterfall etc.
- kcomm ( http://www.g4ilo.com/kcomm.html; supports win  linux but 
should also compile on macs; supports k3 rig control which should work 
with kx3). This has waterfall display among other things.

I am sure there are others (windoze only) but don't know much about 
them... some might even run under wine on other platforms. I recall that 
there is a list of useful software on Elecraft web pages somewhere.

Jussi Eloranta
AA6KJ

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Flex 3000 or KX3

2012-04-03 Thread Jussi Eloranta
On 04/03/2012 05:01 PM, Stu2 wrote:

 On the other hand, if you like the idea of doing things in software
 (e.g. VAC connections to FLDIGI, etc.) then you will have a good time
 with the Flex. The CW issues are fixed for normal operations (35WPM
 non-QSK) and it's a lot of fun to work DX in split pile up. If you are a
 computer geek and a visual person - this is the radio.
Except most computer geeks run linux and flex will get you nowhere.
I would prefer kx3 which at least supports linux for updating firmware
and there is 3rd party software that allows to control it in k3 compat. 
mode.

Jussi Eloranta (AA6KJ)

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] 100W Amp for the KX3?

2012-03-20 Thread Jussi Eloranta
On 03/19/2012 08:43 AM, Ron Lodewyck wrote:
 I am planning to operate mobile from all 50 states in the near future.
 The KX3 is exactly what I have been looking for EXCEPT for the 10 watt
 limitation.  The Elecraft KPA100 amp option for the KX3 would work great
 EXCEPT that it apparently won't be available until after my road trips
 have concluded.  So I went looking for an alternative amp to boost the
 KX3 to around 100 Watts or so.  The following reply to my query from
 Tokyo Hy-Power looks very promising and I thought others might also want
 to check it out:
 ---
 The HL-100bdx... available only direct from Japan is a better
 choice.. Designed for QRP rigs 10W IN = 100W out
 http://www.thp.co.jp/english/hl_100bdx_e.html
 The delivered price is in the $650 range...
 If you're interested  I can have Japan quote you an exact  price to your
 door..

Here seems to be another one:

http://www.jumaradio.com/juma-pa100/


Jussi Eloranta

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] 100W Amp for the KX3?

2012-03-20 Thread Jussi Eloranta
On 03/20/2012 03:55 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
 On 3/20/2012 1:17 PM, Jussi Eloranta wrote:
 Here seems to be another one:

 http://www.jumaradio.com/juma-pa100/

 Pretty, but I don't see any technical specifications, like IMD,
 harmonics, and other spurs.

The guys producing these juma boxes are usually pretty good - perhaps an 
email to OH2NLT or OH7SV
would clarify this. I a bit surprised that it wasn't listed in the specs.

Jussi Eloranta

ps. Both can be reached at @sral.fi


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft KX3 Owner's Manual now available (*preliminary*)

2012-03-17 Thread Jussi Eloranta
Hi,

I think the manual should list the exact pin outs for each connector in KX3
- just like given for the microphone input in the current version of the
manual. Many of these might be obvious to experienced hams (like the CW key
input) but may not be so to new comers. Anyway, I have question related to
the I/Q output - should I use a straight stereo cable (gnd to gnd, left to
left, right to right) for going from I/Q to the line in in my PC sound card?
(the exact pin outs for all the connectors should be preferably listed in an
appendix as a table for fast access).

Thanks,

Jussi Eloranta


--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Elecraft-KX3-Owner-s-Manual-now-available-preliminary-tp7343177p7382111.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft KX3 Owner's Manual now available (*preliminary*)

2012-03-17 Thread Jussi Eloranta
Hi,

Forgot to also mention that the KX3 preliminary manual only refers to a 
windows program (http://www.hdsdr.de) for SDR (which pretty much leaves 
mac and linux users in the dark; it might work under the wine 
emulator?). There are multiplatform applications, such as python based 
quisk, that will do the very basic stuff. Perhaps it would be a good 
idea to try to promote multiplatform solutions (or at least mention 
about their existence)?

Jussi Eloranta

ps. Is there another way to provide feedback on the KX3 manual rather 
than posting everything on the mailing list?
I am pretty sure that most people don't want to see these posts...

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] KX3 and Data Mode Interface

2012-03-17 Thread Jussi Eloranta
On 03/17/2012 02:37 PM, KU7Y wrote:
 Those little 1:1 audio isolation transformers come in several flavors
 600 Ohm and 10K Ohm if memory serves me right.

 Which would be needed if we had to resort to using them?

 OK, back in my hole,

I wonder if the following would do?

http://www.rfsystem.it/shop/product_info.php?products_id=43osCsid=ef8d5ca5252b53e3b2b103b8b75d942c
 
http://www.rfsystem.it/shop/product_info.php?products_id=43osCsid=ef8d5ca5252b53e3b2b103b8b75d942c

It appears to be 600 ohm to 600 ohm with a frequency response up to 100 kHz.

Jussi Eloranta

ps. I have not tried the above - I am actually looking for a suitable 
solution as well.

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html