Re: [Evolution-hackers] to be usable
On Wed, 2001-11-28 at 11:36, Levente Farkas wrote: what I use. rh 7.2 with ximian gnome (everything from Ximian GNOME Desktop and Evolution Snapshot) current verion: evolution-0.99.1-snap.ximian.20040858 Latest Evolution RPM build to my knowledge is evolution-0.99.2-ximian3.i386.rpm - why put a -- before my signature? the signature in my signature file is my full signature and I don't would like to add an extra line with 2 dash! Because this is standard netiquette. The -- indicates the start of the signature. there are many nice probaly useful feature in evo. but the most important to help people to switch to evo. from other mailer. I have to disagree. The most important feature would be stability followed by standards compliance. Helping ease a user's switch from another mailer to Evolution is pure icing on the cake (IMHO). Jamin W. Collins ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution-hackers] Post-1.0 PGP wishlist (was Re: [Evolution] pgp unusable?)
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 15:33, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: THIS IS A BUG IN GPG! gpg tells us everything went fine, so Evolution has no way of knowing that it didn't encrypt to all the recipients we told it to encrypt to, thus it's not our fault. Yuck. There's actually several of these bugs, probably all in GPG. 1) Mail to people with unsigned keys silently encrypts to the sender only. 2) Signature verification of unvalidated keys shows a big success icon (but the accompanying text warns about the problem). 3) I *think* that e-mail to people without keys also encrypts to sender only. Anyway, I'm a fairly intensive GPG user, so I have a few features on a wishlist. All of these are security-related. A) The ability to save a passphrase for (say) 10 minutes without saving it indefinitely. This lets me read mail without endlessly retyping my (really long) passphrase, but doesn't allow me to accidentally save it when I walk away from the computer for a few hours. B) The ability to encrypt all mail to certain addresses by default. There are several people to whom I should *always* encrypt my e-mail, for security reasons. But every once in a while, I'll forget to check the box on the menu. Very, very bad. C) The option to encrypt all responses to encrypted e-mail. If somebody sent me something encrypted, it's presumably private. But if Evolution quotes the original message in my reply, and I forget to check the menu box, I'm screwed. I've convinced Mutt to handle case (B) and (C). But Evolution is much nicer mailer than Mutt, and I'd like to be able to use it without taking quite so many security risks. I'm a US citizen, so I don't know if I can contribute code to this effort. But if were legal for me to do so, I'd be more than happy to help. Thank you for all your cool PGP-hackery. Cheers, Eric ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution-hackers] gnome-vim editor component for evolution
I posted about this a few months ago, and I think I've got something to the stage where others may be interested in taking a look. I've created a bonobo component which embeds VIM inside a zvt widget, and implements part of the GtkHTML interface. It works with Evolution (if you hack evolution a bit so that knows about gnome-vim). You can check it out at http://www.opensky.ca/gnome-vim I'd be curious to hear what people think about it. -- Jason D. Hildebrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] gnome-vim editor component for evolution
Awesome! ;-) Jeff On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 15:58, Jason D. Hildebrand wrote: I posted about this a few months ago, and I think I've got something to the stage where others may be interested in taking a look. I've created a bonobo component which embeds VIM inside a zvt widget, and implements part of the GtkHTML interface. It works with Evolution (if you hack evolution a bit so that knows about gnome-vim). You can check it out at http://www.opensky.ca/gnome-vim I'd be curious to hear what people think about it. -- Jason D. Hildebrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
RE: [Evolution-hackers] gnome-vim editor component for evolution
On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 23:02, Jason D. Hildebrand wrote: There's no reason why the same method wouldn't work for emacs. I guess I thought that most emacs users run a mail client _inside_ of emacs, and wouldn't be interested in evolution at all. :) heh :-) who want's to run an OS inside a mail client not to count what takes longer to load.. evolution or emacs :) -- Name: Ali Akcaagac Status..: Student Of Computer Economic Science E-Mail..: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW.: http://www.fh-wilhelmshaven.de/~akcaagaa ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution] Evolution vs Evolution
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 01:01:40AM +1030, Trevor Nichols wrote: On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 23:58, Ross Burton wrote: Its the IMAP server. imapd is the University of Washington IMAP server which doesn't like multiple connections. I believe if there are multiple simultaneous connections it will drop the original connection. The behaviour however is weird, I see it all of the time at work (RH62 server, with Evo and OE as clients) but my boss never sees it at home (imapd on Solaris). Maybe its a file locking issue which doesn't appear on Solaris builds. I'm using that same IMAP server on a FreeBSD box, same problem. Do you know of / are there another easily configurable IMAP server which does allow multiple connections of the same mailbox? Just for correctness' and completeness' sake: You might take a closer look at the documentation of UW Imapd, as you'll find this to be a mailbox-format-issue. Using the default-format for uw, which is mbox, you run into this issue, using for example mh or mbx (note the difference to mbox) you wouldn't, but certainly lose the accessibilty for local use on the server for various tools only operating on mbox-files. Where this is acceptable, you can stay with uw and just recompile with a different mailbox-format as the default. g, drifter -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] HELO command not supported
I've dealt with quite a few SMTP server issues. If you have no trouble sending to other SMTP servers, try manually sending an email, note: it is key that you type line 2 exactly as is. Some servers try to perform DNS resolution on the privided hostname, I have found that this is the problem 75% of the time, when OTHER smtp servers work. 220 smtp.anobi-asp.com ESMTP HELO blahblah 250 smtp.anobi-asp.com MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 ok RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 ok DATA 354 go ahead TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SUBJECT: somemessage FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a test message . 250 ok 1007135164 qp 28478 QUIT - Original Message - From: Jason High [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:54 AM Subject: Re: [Evolution] HELO command not supported Good idea..hadn't thought of this. I tried it and the server accepted the HELO command...so it's definitely an Evolution problem. Now what? On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:56:42 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Telnet to the SMTP server on port 25, it'll say something like... 220 server.domain.com ESMTP Type this... HELO myhost.mydomain.com See if it errors out on your HELO request...If it does try it again but this time type this... EHLO myhost.mydomain.com See if this errors as well. The EHLO means you want to 'speak' ESMTP. - Original Message - From: Jason High [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 9:26 AM Subject: [Evolution] HELO command not supported Extremely irritating! When I try to send mail (SMTP) with no authentication method specified (the only thing supported by my ISP) I get an error that the HELO command is not supported. My message is sent, but it's not saved to the Sent folder, and I am always returned to the message. It's become a major annoyance, so any help is GREATLY appreciated. Thanks in advance. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] imap trash folder
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 18:04, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: Second, a different IMAP mailer on a different machine, say emacs or outlook, won't know anything about evo's virtual folder; all it could do is to look at the unexpunged email. That's undesirable since a user would need to scroll through a mix of new and old deleted stuff. No, the mailer would only show non-deleted messages. This is not true. Deleting a message in evolution, then accessing the imap folder with outlook shows the deleted message message. At least with Exchange as the imap server. Deleting a message in outlook and going into the folder with evolution does not show the message deleted with outlook, even with show deleted messages selected. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] HELO command not supported
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've dealt with quite a few SMTP server issues. If you have no trouble sending to other SMTP servers, try manually sending an email, note: it is key that you type line 2 exactly as is. Some servers try to perform DNS resolution on the privided hostname, I have found that this is the problem 75% of the time, when OTHER smtp servers work. No SMTP server should _fail_ what it thinks is an invalid HELO. In the case of DNS lookups, it should ignore what you tell it your name is, replace it with that it thinks your name is, and reply as such back to you. Try telnetting to that SMTP server, and giving it random HELO blah commands. Also, try EHLO blah (ESMTP negotiation) and see if you get failures with that. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] HELO command not supported
Unless the server is a wonderful Micro$oft server...For some reason, even though Microsoft asks for the FQDN in windows 2000, i.e. with the appended origin '.' and the end of the domain-name... Check this: Escape character is '^]'. 220 s005034078.asp.anobi.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 5.0.2195.3779 ready at Fri, 30 Nov 2001 11:24:01 -0600 HELO mail.anobi-asp.com. 501 5.5.4 Invalid Address HELO mail.anobi-asp.com 250 s005034078.asp.anobi.com Hello [10.5.99.212] - Original Message - From: Mark Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:41 AM Subject: Re: [Evolution] HELO command not supported On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've dealt with quite a few SMTP server issues. If you have no trouble sending to other SMTP servers, try manually sending an email, note: it is key that you type line 2 exactly as is. Some servers try to perform DNS resolution on the privided hostname, I have found that this is the problem 75% of the time, when OTHER smtp servers work. No SMTP server should _fail_ what it thinks is an invalid HELO. In the case of DNS lookups, it should ignore what you tell it your name is, replace it with that it thinks your name is, and reply as such back to you. Try telnetting to that SMTP server, and giving it random HELO blah commands. Also, try EHLO blah (ESMTP negotiation) and see if you get failures with that. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] imap trash folder
You can configure Outlook to not show deleted messages Outlook has 2 modes for IMAP, 1 is where they show deleted messages and the other is where they move deleted messages to a Trash folder. Jeff On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 11:08, Dwight Hubbard wrote: On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 18:04, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: Second, a different IMAP mailer on a different machine, say emacs or outlook, won't know anything about evo's virtual folder; all it could do is to look at the unexpunged email. That's undesirable since a user would need to scroll through a mix of new and old deleted stuff. No, the mailer would only show non-deleted messages. This is not true. Deleting a message in evolution, then accessing the imap folder with outlook shows the deleted message message. At least with Exchange as the imap server. Deleting a message in outlook and going into the folder with evolution does not show the message deleted with outlook, even with show deleted messages selected. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] pgp unusable?
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 22:39, Thomas O'Dowd wrote: Evolution currently has problems verifying inline PGP signed messages from mailers when they are qp'd by a gateway along the way. Mutt doesn't have that problem so I'm suggesting being liberal (as it is inline pgp anyway) and unencode first then verify which is what other mailers seem to do. We *do* decode the text before trying to verify the signature. With regards to sending 8bit signed inline pgp emails, I haven't tested what is the best thing to do yet, but it looks like sign and then qp is what will work with most email clients. I'm sure there are loads of people who'll appreciate it if we get this working with the big email clients. I don't have direct access to other windows clients but I'll hand create some test emails to friends and see what works. Based on the fact that you thought evolution *didn't* decode the text before verifying, when it actually does - I assume that the correct way is actually the opposite of what you say ;-) here we are again at the who's right and who's wrong? argument. It's a guessing game, like I already said. And you can never win guessing games. Period. If you want this feature, send me a patch. This way if it doesn't always work, no one can point the finger at me. I don't want to deal with it. PGP/MIME has gotten enough complaints because other mailers didn't do *it* right, do you really think that they can all get in-line pgp right if they can't get PGP/MIME right? Didn't think so. I declare this the end of the thread, any further emails will be redirected to /dev/null Jeff -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] imap trash folder
On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 11:43, Mark Neill wrote: This is not true. Deleting a message in evolution, then accessing the imap folder with outlook shows the deleted message message. At least with Exchange as the imap server. Deleting a message in outlook and going into the folder with evolution does not show the message deleted with outlook, even with show deleted messages selected. This is because of Evo's delete behavior. Deleted messages are not removed until you expunge. An Evo-deleted mail is only deleted in Evo's VFolder configuration. When you expunge, the needed DELETE commands are issued to the servers to physically delete the messages. As a clarification: No, the needed delete commands (actually, you tell the IMAP server to mark them as deleted) are done on a timer (we sync flags in batch mode every couple of minutes or whenever you do something that forces us to sync flags) To explain...no, will take too long. To summarize, delete in Evo is a logical delete. Expunge is a physical delete. That's how it works in IMAP too. -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] HELO command not supported
More importantly be willing to wait 10 minutes. We are getting this on a server with bad reverse DNS lookups. EVO may be timing out. On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 08:41, Mark Neill wrote: On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've dealt with quite a few SMTP server issues. If you have no trouble sending to other SMTP servers, try manually sending an email, note: it is key that you type line 2 exactly as is. Some servers try to perform DNS resolution on the privided hostname, I have found that this is the problem 75% of the time, when OTHER smtp servers work. No SMTP server should _fail_ what it thinks is an invalid HELO. In the case of DNS lookups, it should ignore what you tell it your name is, replace it with that it thinks your name is, and reply as such back to you. Try telnetting to that SMTP server, and giving it random HELO blah commands. Also, try EHLO blah (ESMTP negotiation) and see if you get failures with that. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Zot O'Connor http://www.ZotConsulting.com http://www.WhiteKnightHackers.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] gtkhtml 1.0??
Here's a bunch of (probably) stupid questions. Any particular reason it was branched? Just curious since I though the normal way was to remain in one branch until 1.0 then branch new development. So, to continue my ways of having the latest stuff from CVS, should I change the GAL and Evolution branches also? How is gtkhtml2 related to all this? On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 06:52, Rodrigo Moya wrote: On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 05:37, Dan Hensley wrote: A few days ago I updated the Evolution 1 branch from CVS, and it's looking for gtkhtml 1.0. However, gtkhtml hasn't updated for a few days, and it's still at 0.16.1. Is it just that anoncvs hasn't caught up yet, or is there some disconnect? gtkhtml has also been branched. Get the gtkhtml-1-0-branch from CVS cheers -- Rodrigo Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnome-db.org/ - http://www.ximian.com/ ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- TTFN, Lonnie Borntreger -- -- -- Our mission is to authoritatively promote timely methods of empowerment so that we may endeavor to collaboratively supply inexpensive opportunities to exceed customer expectations ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Re: One Specific Folder Not Being Updated On New Mail
On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 08:01, Thomas J. Baker wrote: I've got a problem with a single folder/filter combination. I have a folder that has mail filtered to it from a single source. When new mail arrives in that folder, that folder name doesn't get changed to bold in the folder list, nor is it's count updated. Unfortunately, I only get mail that is applicable once a week on Mondays at noon. The last two Tuesday mornings I've come in, started evolution, and it's shown the new messages in that folder so the problem has been occurring for at least two weeks. I just looked at the filter and it seems fine. I'll try to do some more testing to see if I can make it occur consistently. tjb I've had a repeat of this problem. I have a folder for redhat-announce and a corresponding filter. I just notification of a new message from the mail applet, clicked on send/receive in evo, and no folders in the folder view were updated with new messages. I then clicked on the redhat-announce folder and there was a new message in it and the folder went bold. tjb ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] html-mails / display error
perhaps anybody out there who can help me making it better? On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 21:44, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: The Content-Id on the image is invalid in multiple ways. Jeff On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 15:31, Manuel Streuhofer wrote: Hi List! a week ago i sent a bug to the list. but i got ignored (more or less) perhaps a few new users of this list are more interessed in the problem. The Problem is, that html-mails with inline-pictures the picture is also in the email (see below) didn't get shown correctly. below is a piece of the email. perhaps anyone knows the problem? I want to specify the Problem: The Image is not shown at all. but only in evolution. _all_ other mailclients can show it correctly. so why can't evo show it? many thanks, Manuel Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 28807 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2001 08:00:19 - Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 28804 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2001 08:00:19 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: 200111220800.JAA29550@.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 2.111 (A1.41; B2.12; Q2.03) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 08:00:03 UT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [garfield] Comic vom 22-11-2001 X-Rcpt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary==-UklzLPs9aBRQ+P/Gb8n4 --=-h7Z1TSVf+RYEbbV6iTll Content-Disposition: inline Content-Length: 122 Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Content-Type: text/html bodybrcenter img src=cid:20011122.gif; border=2 brbr(1 / 09:00:02) /center/body --=-h7Z1TSVf+RYEbbV6iTll Content-Disposition: inline; filename=20011122.gif Content-Id: 20011122.gif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: image/gif; NAME=20011122.gif R0lGODlhWAKzAOYAAOd5hqGVVLJlnv///0c0Jc/Pz/vrsf/7g5JMADIsKuuuAMOCrlFPTZeXl73T 8gAAAKysrHFxcPvjfVJMMWtISctsdeNufLWKGDcqEq1dmRgWFXFLD29oULRtccaSAuLi4o1pCopT V45wKSMcEu/TsOV1gWVUKOvWdVs4QIZQd4p8aXJlN7NqotbMb+eqAL2zZae60nBHZbmsiQkICBkT . . . -- best regards, Manuel Streuhofer -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- best regards, Manuel Streuhofer msg03723/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[Evolution] Message display header font
I seem to have a problem with the font size of mail header fields. The field labels (To:, From: etc) are sizing correctly as per the GTKHTML settings in gnomecc, but the data portion of the display (the actual from and to addressses, and subject text) are miniscule. Where does Evolution pull the font settings for these fields? ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] zaplet display
yoz. someone sent me a zaplet message (zaplet.com), and it did not display correctly at all. i assume this would be because of invalid html or some such, any prior knowledge of zaplet-evo. interaction? -Joe msg03725/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[Evolution] feature requests
hi first of all thanks for this great software, i've been using it for quite a while now and it is getting more stable with every beta/rc. still i'm missing some features that would make it even better. if some of them are already possible and i just didn't find them yet, please somebody enlighten me. also please forgive me if some of these thing have already been discussed, i haven't been reading the list for a while. 1) why can i have more than one server receiving mail from but send only with one? it would be nice to send each mail with the outgoing server of the account that matches the sender email address used in this mail. the reason for this is that some of my email accounts let me send only messages with the corresponding sender email, so i have to use the sender of my default account for all mails. 2) related with 1 because it would partly solve the problem: why doesn't the reply to field offer the same dropdown list as the from field? 3) my current provider uses pop after smtp authentication. so when i write emails and the time span has run out i have to hit send/receive twice to get everything sent. a checkbox in the account options would be nice for this, so sending could be done _after_ receiving from the account and not simultaniously. 4) dragging contacts into folders only copies them, i would like to move them with some additional key. 5) the context menus in contacts could have the cut/copy/paste entries. 6) how about customizable key strokes like gimp 7) is there any way to remove the attachment from a mail while the message? 8) a filter based on whether the sender/recipient is in a certain contacts folder or category would be nice. bye fabian ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Looking for a slideshow or..
Let me explain: As a member of Linux Users' Group of Turkey, I'll try to perform a quick demonstration of Evolution at 7th and 8th (this weekend). Therefore, to save some time; I'm looking for a slideshow or some eye-candy stuff. Can you help? :) Thanks -- 1/2/-+ /\(3) / Enver ALTIN | | 2 1/3 / System Analyst/Programmer | |z dz cos(3 * PI / 9) = ln (e) | @ CAS Trustcenter, Inc. | || [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \/ 1 | http://www.casdb.com/ | --- The integral of z squared, dz | Please do not e-mail me | From 1 to the square root of 3|directly, unless asked | Times the cosine| if you have received this | Of 3 PI over nine | in a mailing list | Is the log of the cube root of e +---+ _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] gtkhtml 1.0??
1.0 is on the gtkhtml-1-0-branch --Larry On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 22:37, Dan Hensley wrote: A few days ago I updated the Evolution 1 branch from CVS, and it's looking for gtkhtml 1.0. However, gtkhtml hasn't updated for a few days, and it's still at 0.16.1. Is it just that anoncvs hasn't caught up yet, or is there some disconnect? Dan ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] zaplet display
On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 17:31, Joe Barnett wrote: yoz. someone sent me a zaplet message (zaplet.com), and it did not display correctly at all. i assume this would be because of invalid html or some such, any prior knowledge of zaplet-evo. interaction? Never heard of it. You could forward the message and/or attach it to a bugzilla bug if you want someone to look at it. -- Dan ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
