[Fonts]New versions of mkfontscale and FreeType 2 backend
New versions of both mkfontscale and the FreeType 2 backend are available from http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/files/ Note that you will need to apply the ``xfree86-freetype2.patch'' even if you've done before, as this version contains a little more stuff. I gratefully acknowledge the help of Ishikawa Mutsumi and James Cloos for this version. Changes in mkfontscale: - support for non-AGL Type 1 fonts (e.g. symbol fonts); - support for more Type 1 weights; - smarter handling of non-Unicode fonts. Changes in the FreeType 2 backend: - fixes a crash when adding properties (due to Ishikawa Mutsumi); - support for OpenType/CFF fonts; - support for non-AGL Type 1 fonts; - support for custom Type 1 encodings (``adobe-fontspecific''); - minor fixes to Type 1 metrics (the problem with average width remains); - a number of minor cleanups. I would need people to help me make mkfontscale smarter when working with East-Asian encodings; I think some additions to the definition of CODE_IGNORED are needed to do a decent job with Chinese encodings (Japanese and Korean encodings seem to work with the current heuristics). If you think you're competent to give me a hand with that, please do get in touch. Juliusz ___ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
Re: [Fonts]New versions of mkfontscale and FreeType 2 backend
Hi, > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> New versions of both mkfontscale and the FreeType 2 backend are >> available from >> >> http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/files/ >> >> Note that you will need to apply the ``xfree86-freetype2.patch'' even >> if you've done before, as this version contains a little more stuff. I saw the ``xfree86-freetype2.patch'', and I found it does not contain ftstdlib.h related chank. It is still needed. *** /dev/null Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970 --- xc/extras/freetype2/include/ftstdlib.h Wed Apr 3 23:43:43 2002 *** *** 0 --- 1,18 + #ifndef _FT_STDLIB_H + #define _FT_STDLIB_H + #ifndef FONTMODULE + #include + #include + #include + #include + #else + #include "Xmd.h" + #include "Xdefs.h" + #include "xf86_ansic.h" + #endif + + #ifndef offsetof + #define offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER) ((size_t) &((TYPE *)0)->MEMBER) + #endif + + #endif -- ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
Re: [Fonts]New versions of mkfontscale and FreeType 2 backend
I'm running the new ft2 backend now for all scalled fonts.¹ Most everything looks good so far. I've tried several different fonts in mozilla, rxvt, gvim. The average width error is still there for type1 fonts, but AFAICT it affects very few programs that one usually doesn't notice. SuSE patches the type1 backend to treak urw-fontspecific like adobe-fontspecific. (They also patch xftfreetype.c for this.) Perhaps generalizing -adobe-fontspecific into -*-fontspecific would be reasonable? They have urw-fontspecific in: /usr/share/ghostscript/fonts/fonts.dir for the -URW-Dingbats- and -URW-Standard Symbols L- fonts. I'm also having trouble adding /usr/lib/jdk1.3/jre/lib/fonts to the font path. It craps out with: X Error of failed request: 86 Major opcode of failed request: 51 (X_SetFontPath) Serial number of failed request: 8 Current serial number in output stream: 10 which seems indicative of a broken fonts.dir. Making a new fonts.dir with mkfontscale;mkfontdir however did not solve that one. I've tried with both IBM Java 1.3's and Sun/Blackdown 1.3.1's jre/lib/fonts. Everything else looks great, though, whether t1, ttf or otf. -JimC ¹ While the speedo backend is also loaded, the speedo fonts are not in the fontpath. Useful, eh? :) ___ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
Re: [Fonts]New versions of mkfontscale and FreeType 2 backend
Hi Juliusz, Red Hat will use a updated ttmkfdir in the next release, we updated the ttmkfdir to FreeType2 and also added some other CJK releated features(like TTCap), and it uses system encodings.dir as default to recognize font encodings. If anyone has interests, please have a look of http://people.redhat.com/yshao, I can also provide any help you need. Another thing is we really see some real needs of TrueType embedded bitmap feature support in mainland China at the moment, don't know if you have any plan to add this to the X freetype backend? Regards, Yu Shao Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: >New versions of both mkfontscale and the FreeType 2 backend are >available from > > http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/files/ > >Note that you will need to apply the ``xfree86-freetype2.patch'' even >if you've done before, as this version contains a little more stuff. > >I gratefully acknowledge the help of Ishikawa Mutsumi and James Cloos >for this version. > >Changes in mkfontscale: > > - support for non-AGL Type 1 fonts (e.g. symbol fonts); > - support for more Type 1 weights; > - smarter handling of non-Unicode fonts. > >Changes in the FreeType 2 backend: > > - fixes a crash when adding properties (due to Ishikawa Mutsumi); > - support for OpenType/CFF fonts; > - support for non-AGL Type 1 fonts; > - support for custom Type 1 encodings (``adobe-fontspecific''); > - minor fixes to Type 1 metrics (the problem with average width remains); > - a number of minor cleanups. > >I would need people to help me make mkfontscale smarter when working >with East-Asian encodings; I think some additions to the definition of >CODE_IGNORED are needed to do a decent job with Chinese encodings >(Japanese and Korean encodings seem to work with the current >heuristics). If you think you're competent to give me a hand with >that, please do get in touch. > >Juliusz >___ >Fonts mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts > ___ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
Re: [Fonts]New versions of mkfontscale and FreeType 2 backend
I jus realized that there is a significant difference with the new ft2 backend. I've lost underlining in mozilla. I've verified that the underlines are there when it uses its xft2 engine, but disappear with server-side fonts. (Something was bothering me about it last night, but I couldn't put my finger on it until this morning.) Oddly, though, the underlines do show up in netscape 4.7. I'm not yet sure why there is a difference. I'll keep hunting -JimC ___ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
Re: [Fonts]New versions of mkfontscale and FreeType 2 backend
YS> Red Hat will use a updated ttmkfdir in the next release, we YS> updated the ttmkfdir to FreeType2 and also added some other CJK YS> releated features(like TTCap), and it uses system encodings.dir as YS> default to recognize font encodings. Mkfontscale does all of that except for TTCap (which I won't implement). The main advantage of mkfontscale is that it uses the very same encoding database as the FreeType backend -- which ensures utmost consistency between the two. YS> Another thing is we really see some real needs of TrueType YS> embedded bitmap feature support in mainland China at the moment, YS> don't know if you have any plan to add this to the X freetype YS> backend? It is my understanding that this happens automatically if you use FreeType 2; please correct me if I'm wrong. Juliusz ___ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
Re: [Fonts]New versions of mkfontscale and FreeType 2 backend
IM> I saw the ``xfree86-freetype2.patch'', and I found it does not IM> contain ftstdlib.h related chank. It is still needed. Thanks for the report. I forgot ``-N''. I'll generate a new patch ASAP. Juliusz ___ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
Re: [Fonts]New versions of mkfontscale and FreeType 2 backend
JC> I'm running the new ft2 backend now for all scalled fonts. JC> Most everything looks good so far. Great to know. JC> Perhaps generalizing -adobe-fontspecific into -*-fontspecific JC> would be reasonable? Fine. Although mkfontscale will still only generate `adobe-fontspecific'. JC> I'm also having trouble adding /usr/lib/jdk1.3/jre/lib/fonts JC> to the font path. Permissions? NFS authorisation? (The server runs as root, not as you.) I'll try to see if I can reproduce it. Juliusz ___ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
Re: [Fonts]New versions of mkfontscale and FreeType 2 backend
JC> The average width error is still there for type1 fonts, but AFAICT JC> it affects very few programs that one usually doesn't notice. According to David Turner, this may be a bug in FreeType 2.0.9 that was fixed in 2.1.0. I haven't had time to test his guess yet. (Keith, what about importing 2.1.0?) Juliusz ___ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
Re: [Fonts]New versions of mkfontscale and FreeType 2 backend
Around 16 o'clock on Apr 18, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > According to David Turner, this may be a bug in FreeType 2.0.9 that > was fixed in 2.1.0. I haven't had time to test his guess yet. > (Keith, what about importing 2.1.0?) I can do that; feel free to test with it and see if it does fix the problems. Are you now using the regular .so for your server-side module? Keith PackardXFree86 Core TeamCompaq Cambridge Research Lab ___ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
Re: [Fonts]New versions of mkfontscale and FreeType 2 backend
> "Juliusz" == Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JC> I'm also having trouble adding /usr/lib/jdk1.3/jre/lib/fonts to JC> the font path. Juliusz> Permissions? NFS authorisation? (The server runs as root, Juliusz> not as you.) Not a permissions problem. Everything is on hda. Xft is able to access those files. I have taken another look. The fonts.scale generated by mkfontscale (20020417) assigned the same XLDF to more than one ttf. It also had bad weight values in the XLFDs. (The XftCache in that dir shows that all of the normal weight fonts are weight=100 and the (demi)bold versions are all 200. mkfontscale returns a weight of thin for many but not all of the Lucida fonts therein; it does get a couple of the right.) I don't see that error in the ttmkfdir output, but there is probably something of the sort Both fonts.dir files result in exactly the same error, so there probably *is* some problem with the ttmkfdir version as well. -JimC ___ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
Re: [Fonts]New versions of mkfontscale and FreeType 2 backend
JC> I jus realized that there is a significant difference with the new JC> ft2 backend. I've lost underlining in mozilla. Please check the values of the UNDERLINE_POSITION and UNDERLINE_WIDTH properties (xlsfonts -ll -fn 'foo'). Juliusz ___ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
Re: [Fonts]New versions of mkfontscale and FreeType 2 backend
Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: KP> Are you now using the regular .so for your server-side module? That's the plan ultimately (I wouldn't dare disobey Keith), but it's still premature for two reasons. I'm currently using two internal interfaces, which I don't wish to export to server modules. I'll first need to modify FreeType to make the data I need available legally, and then get the nice FreeType hackers to bless my new interfaces (and, knowing them, to change them completely in the process). I also need to modify FreeType to behave reliably in the default Linux build by falling back to fread if mmap failes. I'm just not willing to deal with the bug reports I'll receive if I don't do that. Juliusz P.S. In case you missed either of the discussions, http://www.freetype.org/pipermail/freetype/2002-April/002121.html http://www.freetype.org/pipermail/freetype/2002-April/002053.html ___ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
Re: [Fonts]New versions of mkfontscale and FreeType 2 backend
Around 17 o'clock on Apr 19, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > I'm currently using two internal interfaces, which I don't wish to > export to server modules. (from old mail...) > (i) to determine whether a font uses glyph names or Unicode indices > as its native encoding format (only Type 1 fonts fall into the > former category currently); I need this as well to fix MathML mode in Mozilla when using Xft. I believe it would be sufficient (if not exact) to simply check for type1 fonts, with the possible exception of OpenType fonts translated directly from Type1 fonts. I don't know how you'd check for that case though. As for accessing the source-specific fields in the font, I've had the PCF FreeType developer suggest that as the "standard" way of getting at such information. I'd rather have APIs that returned the private structure from a font (null if the wrong type) so that a magic strcmp wasn't necessary, and so that the library could transcode the information from OpenType (or other "wrapper" font formats) if available. As long as those datastructures appear in the public API for FreeType, they shouldn't change without a major library version number change. Keith PackardXFree86 Core TeamCompaq Cambridge Research Lab ___ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
Re: [Fonts]New versions of mkfontscale and FreeType 2 backend
JC> I just realized that there is a significant difference with the new JC> ft2 backend. I've lost underlining in mozilla. Juliusz> Please check the values of the UNDERLINE_POSITION and Juliusz> UNDERLINE_WIDTH properties (xlsfonts -ll -fn 'foo'). With Georgia, UNDERLINE_POSITION is O(-PIXEL_SIZE/10) and thickness is O(PIXEL_SIZE/20). Other ttf and otf fonts seem to be the same. With type1 fonts, the UNDERLINE_POSITION is O(PIXEL_SIZE/10). I presume the sign is then the problem. ... ... Yup. The underlines reappear when I choose a type1 font. I thought I tested that, but obviously I didn't do so thoroughly. :( -JimC ___ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
Re: [Fonts]New versions of mkfontscale and FreeType 2 backend
> Changes in mkfontscale: > > - support for non-AGL Type 1 fonts (e.g. symbol fonts); > - support for more Type 1 weights; > - smarter handling of non-Unicode fonts. Hi, all. First thing to say: if this mail is redundant, I am sorry. I have posted two mails before but no exist on this list so I try again. I just tested mkfontscale-20020418 and felt it is pretty good. :) But I found some problem: (I tested it with Arphic TTF which be distributed with most Linux distributions and all *BSD.) 1) Here is the fonts.scale: bsmi00lp.ttf -arphic-AR PL Mingti2L Big5-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-iso10646-1 bkai00mp.ttf -arphic-AR PL KaitiM Big5-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-iso10646-1 gkai00mp.ttf -arphic-AR PL KaitiM GB-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb2312.1980-0 gkai00mp.ttf -arphic-AR PL KaitiM GB-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-iso10646-1 gbsn00lp.ttf -arphic-AR PL SungtiL GB-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb2312.1980-0 gbsn00lp.ttf -arphic-AR PL SungtiL GB-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-iso10646-1 but it miss two lines for Big5 encoding fonts: bsmi00lp.ttf -arphic-AR PL Mingti2L Big5-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-big5-0 bkai00mp.ttf -arphic-AR PL KaitiM Big5-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-big5-0 It seems the problem of FT_Get_Char_Index() in checkEncoding(). I think you could fixed this for us to save my time free from hacking work. ;) 2) After I add that two lines by hand, I still have to edit the fonts.alias file for running rxvt. The sample for 16 pixel fonts is: "-aliasarphic-AR PL Mingti2L Big5-medium-r-normal--16-160-0-0-p-160-big5-0" "-arphic-AR PL Mingti2L Big5-medium-r-normal--16-160-0-0-p-160-big5-0" The other two GB encoding fonts seems don't need fonts.alias file. 3) Besides that, I need to fix the spacing value 'p' to 'c' because the value 'p' will cause delay in several seconds when start-up rxvt. Don't know why. X-) The other two GB encoding fonts seems don't need fix the value. However, thanks for your program! Would it be merged into next XFree snapshot? -rxg ___ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
Re: [Fonts]New versions of mkfontscale and FreeType 2 backend
> It seems the problem of FT_Get_Char_Index() in checkEncoding().
Hi, I just do the quick testing work with this:
--- mkfontscale.c.orig Wed Apr 24 16:47:01 2002
+++ mkfontscale.c Fri Apr 26 22:39:18 2002
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
#include "freetype/internal/ftobjs.h"
#include "freetype/internal/t1types.h"
#include "freetype/ftmodule.h"
+#include "freetype/internal/sfnt.h"
#define FACE_TYPE(FACE) ((FACE)->driver->clazz->root.module_name)
#define T1INFO(FACE) \
@@ -58,7 +59,7 @@
"adobe-standard", "adobe-symbol", "ibm-cp437", "microsoft-cp1252",
/* But not "adobe-dingbats", as it uses generic glyph names. */
"jisx0201.1976-0", "jisx0208.1983-0", "jisx0208.1990-0",
- "jisx0212.1190-0", "big5.eten-0", "gb2312.1980-0",
+ "jisx0212.1990-0", "big5-0", "gb2312.1980-0",
"ksc5601.1987-0", "ksc5601.1992-3"};
char *extra_encodings_array[] =
@@ -498,6 +499,7 @@
int i, j, c, koi8;
char *n;
FT_CharMap cmap;
+TT_CMapTable* ttcmap;
encoding = FontEncFind(encoding_name, NULL);
if(!encoding)
@@ -542,7 +544,13 @@
if(CODE_IGNORED(c)) {
continue;
} else {
-if(FT_Get_Char_Index(face, c) == 0) {
+if(face && face->charmap) {
+ttcmap = &((TT_CharMap)face->charmap)->cmap;
+if(ttcmap->get_index)
+/* if(ttcmap->get_index(ttcmap, c) == 0)
+return 0; */
+return ttcmap->get_index(ttcmap, c);
+} else {
return 0;
}
}
then I get another fonts.scale file:
28
bsmi00lp.ttf -arphic-AR PL Mingti2L Big5-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-jisx0208.1
983-0
bsmi00lp.ttf -arphic-AR PL Mingti2L Big5-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-jisx0208.1
990-0
bsmi00lp.ttf -arphic-AR PL Mingti2L Big5-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-big5-0
bsmi00lp.ttf -arphic-AR PL Mingti2L Big5-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb2312.198
0-0
bsmi00lp.ttf -arphic-AR PL Mingti2L Big5-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-ksc5601.19
87-0
bsmi00lp.ttf -arphic-AR PL Mingti2L Big5-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-ksc5601.19
92-3
bsmi00lp.ttf -arphic-AR PL Mingti2L Big5-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-iso10646-1...
What't the secret in get_index()? X-)
> 2) After I add those two lines by hand, I still have to edit the fonts.alias
> file for running rxvt. The sample for 16 pixel fonts is:
...
The other two GB encoding fonts also need it.
Maybe we need a script to generate it.
> 3) Besides that, I need to fix the spacing value 'p' to 'c' because the
> value 'p' will cause delay in several seconds when start-up rxvt.
...
The other two GB encoding fonts also get the same situation...
-rxg
___
Fonts mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
Re: [Fonts]New versions of mkfontscale and FreeType 2 backend
CC'd to Freetype.
Rui-Xiang Guo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
RG> - "jisx0212.1190-0", "big5.eten-0", "gb2312.1980-0",
RG> + "jisx0212.1990-0", "big5-0", "gb2312.1980-0",
Okay, in next version. Thanks.
RG> (I tested it with Arphic TTF which be distributed with most Linux
RG> distributions and all *BSD.)
Hmm, there may be problems with this font; I'm told it has bugs.
Maybe the FreeType folks can comment?
RG> It seems the problem of FT_Get_Char_Index() in checkEncoding().
RG> -if(FT_Get_Char_Index(face, c) == 0) {
RG> +if(face && face->charmap) {
RG> +ttcmap = &((TT_CharMap)face->charmap)->cmap;
RG> +if(ttcmap->get_index)
RG> +/* if(ttcmap->get_index(ttcmap, c) == 0)
RG> +return 0; */
RG> +return ttcmap->get_index(ttcmap, c);
Very curious. I'll try to understand what's going on.
RG> 3) Besides that, I need to fix the spacing value 'p' to 'c' because the
RG> value 'p' will cause delay in several seconds when start-up rxvt.
Again, that's a font bug; mkfontscale tries to work out which fonts
are proportional. On the other hand, it doesn't yet implement a
heuristic to distinguich monospaced (-m-) from charcell (-c-) fonts.
I guess a suitable heuristic would be to decalare all monospaced fonts
in East-Asian encodings to be charcell.
RG> Would it be merged into next XFree snapshot?
I hope so.
Thanks,
Juliusz
___
Fonts mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
Re: [Fonts]New versions of mkfontscale and FreeType 2 backend
JC> With type1 fonts, the UNDERLINE_POSITION is O(PIXEL_SIZE/10). I JC> presume the sign is then the problem. Thanks a lot for the debugging -- fix in next version. Juliusz ___ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
Re: [Fonts]New versions of mkfontscale and FreeType 2 backend
> RG> 3) Besides that, I need to fix the spacing value 'p' to 'c' because the
> RG> value 'p' will cause delay in several seconds when start-up rxvt.
>
> Again, that's a font bug; mkfontscale tries to work out which fonts
> are proportional. On the other hand, it doesn't yet implement a
> heuristic to distinguich monospaced (-m-) from charcell (-c-) fonts.
Hi,
I tested your program with another two Chinese ttf from win9x -
MINGLIU.TTC and KAIU.TTF, here is the result:
MINGLIU.TTC -dynalab-MingLiU-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-1
MINGLIU.TTC -dynalab-MingLiU-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1
KAIU.TTF -dynalab-DFKai-SB-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-1
KAIU.TTF -dynalab-DFKai-SB-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1
It looks better then I added this line by hand:
MINGLIU.TTC -dynalab-MingLiU-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-big5-0
The spacing value 'm' still will cause delay with rxvt. Don't know why. :)
The CJK ttf seem must use the 'c' value to avoid this problem.
ps. how to fix the font's bugs if I want?
maybe fixing this program will be much easy. :)
> I guess a suitable heuristic would be to decalare all monospaced fonts
> in East-Asian encodings to be charcell.
How about using os2->ulCodePageRange1 to lookup the font encoding for supporting
modren Unicode encoded CJK fonts? This idea is from another program.
Then set their spacing value to 'c'.
Here is a patch to do it:
--- mkfontscale.c.orig Sat May 18 18:15:35 2002
+++ mkfontscale.c
@@ -37,6 +37,12 @@
#include "freetype/internal/t1types.h"
#include "freetype/ftmodule.h"
+#define TT_CODEPAGE_RANGE_932(1L << 17) /* JIS/Japan */
+#define TT_CODEPAGE_RANGE_936(1L << 18) /* Chinese: Simplified */
+#define TT_CODEPAGE_RANGE_949(1L << 19) /* Korean Wansung */
+#define TT_CODEPAGE_RANGE_950(1L << 20) /* Chinese: Traditional */
+#define TT_CODEPAGE_RANGE_1361 (1L << 21) /* Korean Johab */
+
#define FACE_TYPE(FACE) ((FACE)->driver->clazz->root.module_name)
#define T1INFO(FACE) \
(strcasecmp(FACE_TYPE(FACE), "type1") == 0 ?\
@@ -58,7 +64,7 @@
"adobe-standard", "adobe-symbol", "ibm-cp437", "microsoft-cp1252",
/* But not "adobe-dingbats", as it uses generic glyph names. */
"jisx0201.1976-0", "jisx0208.1983-0", "jisx0208.1990-0",
- "jisx0212.1190-0", "big5.eten-0", "gb2312.1980-0",
+ "jisx0212.1990-0", "big5-0", "gb2312.1980-0",
"ksc5601.1987-0", "ksc5601.1992-3"};
char *extra_encodings_array[] =
@@ -69,7 +75,7 @@
#define countof(_a) (sizeof(_a)/sizeof((_a)[0]))
int doDirectory(char*);
-static int checkEncoding(FT_Face face, char *encoding_name);
+static int checkEncoding(FT_Face face, char *encoding_name, TT_OS2 *os2);
static int checkExtraEncoding(FT_Face face, char *encoding_name, int found);
static int find_cmap(int type, int pid, int eid, FT_Face face,
FT_CharMap *cmap_return);
@@ -456,7 +462,12 @@
if(!spacing) spacing = "p";
for(encoding = encodings; encoding; encoding = encoding->next)
-if(checkEncoding(face, encoding->value)) {
+if(checkEncoding(face, encoding->value, os2)) {
+if((strncmp("jis", encoding->value, 3) == 0) ||
+ (strncmp("big5", encoding->value, 4) == 0) ||
+ (strncmp("gb", encoding->value, 2) == 0) ||
+ (strncmp("ksc", encoding->value, 3) == 0))
+spacing = "c";
found = 1;
entries = listConsF(entries,
"%s -%s-%s-%s-%s-%s-%s-0-0-0-0-%s-0-%s",
@@ -491,7 +502,7 @@
}
static int
-checkEncoding(FT_Face face, char *encoding_name)
+checkEncoding(FT_Face face, char *encoding_name, TT_OS2 *os2)
{
FontEncPtr encoding;
FontMapPtr mapping;
@@ -542,6 +553,18 @@
if(CODE_IGNORED(c)) {
continue;
} else {
+if((strcmp(encoding->name, "jisx0208.1983-0")==0) &
&
+ (os2->ulCodePageRange1 & TT_CODEPAGE_RANGE_932))
+return 1;
+if((strcmp(encoding->name, "big5.eten-0")==0) &&
+ (os2->ulCodePageRange1 & TT_CODEPAGE_RANGE_950))
+return 1;
+if((strcmp(encoding->name, "gb2312.1980-0")==0) &&
+ (os2->ulCodePageRange1 & TT_CODEPAGE_RANGE_936))
+return 1;
+if((strcmp(encoding->name, "ksc5601.1987-0")==0) &&
+ (os2->ulCodePageRange1 & TT_CODEPAGE_RANGE_949))
+return 1;
if(FT_Get_Char_Index(face, c) == 0) {
return 0;
}
(END)
After adopting this patch, I test it with arphic ttf again,
the result is what I need:
gkai00
Re: [Fonts]New versions of mkfontscale and FreeType 2 backend
Thanks for the report and the suggestions. RG> It looks better then I added this line by hand: RG> MINGLIU.TTC -dynalab-MingLiU-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-big5-0 Yu Shao has just suggested to me the following heuristic for CJK fonts: an encoding is supported by the font if fewer than 2% of the glyphs are missing. I'm going to implement this scheme, and Big-5 encodings should be properly generated in the next version. RG> The spacing value 'm' still will cause delay with rxvt. Don't know why. :) There's an optimisation (hack) for charcell (as opposed to monospaced) fonts in the FreeType backend. The delay you're seeing is what happens when we don't apply said hack. RG> How about using os2->ulCodePageRange1 to lookup the font encoding RG> for supporting modren Unicode encoded CJK fonts? I need to think about it some more. What if Microsoft comes up with Courier New Unicode? I'm more tempted to peek at the font's bounding box to determine if it's charcell. I'll need to check whether this gives good results. Juliusz ___ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
