Re: [Gimp-user] Questions About Creating Panoramas From Several Images
I take back all the bad things I said about Hugin..I tried it again, and it created a great panorama from my photos. I blame it all on pilot error the first time through.that's my story and I am sticking to it!;-) Thanks for everyone's great tips and suggestoins! Mark ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Questions About Creating Panoramas From Several Images
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Ofnuts wrote: > On 11/30/2010 01:09 AM, Mark Phillips wrote: > > I followed the instructions for creating a panorama from 4 pictures in > > the Beginning Gimp book (Apres - AkkanaPeck) and it looks great except > > I have a dark vertical shadow where two of the images meet. How do I > > get rid of it? I am working on Linux Debian testing with Gimp 2.6.10. > > > > Briefly, this is what I did: > > 1. Make an new image a little larger than 4 X the width of one picture > > 2. Add first picture as a layer. > > 3. Add the second as another layer > > 4. Overlap image two over image one until they line up. > > 5. Add layer mask to image 2 > > 6. Add gradient to layer mask - black to white from edge of second > > image to 3/4 of the way to edge of image 1 > > 7. Repeat as needed for each new image > > > > By looking at the image, I would say the vertical band of darkness is > > the area of the gradient/overlap of the two images. I am a complete > > novice at this > > > > Thanks! > > > > Mark > > > > P.S. I have also tried Hugin, which I could not get to work, and the > > gimp panorama plugin, which produce the same problem as above. > > Your shadow on the seam is caused by a general color mismatch between > the right part of the left image and the left part of the right one. > Creating panoramas requires to set the camera in manual mode to make > sure it won't change exposure parameters between the various shots. And > even once you have done that you still have shadow problems to sort out > because your photo has vignetting (slightly darker in the corners) and > the seam may be done between the border of a picture (dark) and a more > inner part of the next (slightly lighter). And this assumes of course > that you have got the geometry right, and corrected any tilt in the > pictures, etc... > > To make it short, assembling panoramas in Gimp is a lot of hard work. > The only pictures that aren't too hard to assemble in Gimp are those > from a flatbed scanner. > > Invest you time in making Hugin work. This will be a lot more rewarding > in the end. > Hmmmthat is very discouragingthe panorama from Gimp looks great, except for the two vertical black shadows where three pictures were joined. The sahdows are over water and sky.Gimp is so powerful, I am surprised there isn't some way to get rid of them. Mark > > ___ > Gimp-user mailing list > Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user > ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Fwd: Questions About Creating Panoramas From Several Images
Ooops...didn't hit reply to all. -- Forwarded message -- From: Mark Phillips Date: Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:24 PM Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Questions About Creating Panoramas From Several Images To: Alexandre Prokoudine On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine < alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/30/10, Mark Phillips wrote: > > > P.S. I have also tried Hugin, which I could not get to work, > > What exactly didn't work? > I had a lot of trouble creating the points. I installed Hugin from the Debian respositories (v 2010.0.0.5045) and out of the box I got the error message about the non-free point calculating module. I then installed another debian package - the new all free c version, and that did not work. I kept getting error 250. So then I tried running panorama-c-sift and panorama-c-complete from the command line and got lots of output and no errors. I then imported the resulting projects into Hugin and clicked on create panorama in the assistant and I got an image that was all distorted and bore little resemblance to my original images. I tried to put the pictures together manually, and I couldn't get the 'quick panorama' button to generate a useable image. Very frustrating. I laughed when I found this article - https://panospace.wordpress.com/2010/09/26/the-quest-is-over/..I guess I will have to wait until next year for cpfind to try it again. If you can point me to a step by step tutorial that would be great! Mark > > Alexandre Prokoudine > http://libregraphicsworld.org > ___ > Gimp-user mailing list > Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user > ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Questions About Creating Panoramas From Several Images
I followed the instructions for creating a panorama from 4 pictures in the Beginning Gimp book (Apres - AkkanaPeck) and it looks great except I have a dark vertical shadow where two of the images meet. How do I get rid of it? I am working on Linux Debian testing with Gimp 2.6.10. Briefly, this is what I did: 1. Make an new image a little larger than 4 X the width of one picture 2. Add first picture as a layer. 3. Add the second as another layer 4. Overlap image two over image one until they line up. 5. Add layer mask to image 2 6. Add gradient to layer mask - black to white from edge of second image to 3/4 of the way to edge of image 1 7. Repeat as needed for each new image By looking at the image, I would say the vertical band of darkness is the area of the gradient/overlap of the two images. I am a complete novice at this Thanks! Mark P.S. I have also tried Hugin, which I could not get to work, and the gimp panorama plugin, which produce the same problem as above. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] OT - Having Problems Displaying Image Thumbnails
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Frank Gore wrote: > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Mark Phillips > wrote: > > My apologies for this OT post, but I need some help from an "image > expert", > > and I thought the Gimp list might have one or two. > > When I upload images from a friend's digital camera, a Java web app is > not > > able to create thumbnails (they appear black with the title of the image > in > > the image area). However, clicking on the missing thumbnail renders the > full > > image. When I upload images from a different camera, the same app > generates > > the thumbnail and also renders the full image. Is there a special setting > > that camera's have to have set to allow thumbnails to be created? Both > file > > types are jpeg. I am not seeing any error messages from the app. > > Yep, definitely off-topic :p > > Those applications you mentioned probably aren't generating > thumbnails. They're just using the existing thumbnail that's embedded > in the file. Most cameras embed a thumbnail in the JPG file, some do > not. Your friend's camera probably just doesn't have those thumbnails > embedded. > I tested a "bad" image and a "good" image using Jeffrey's Exif viewer ( http://regex.info/exif.cgi), and both images had an embedded thumbnail. The only difference I saw in the two files from the two cameras was that the image from the bad camera had this warning;thumbnail size does not match image size. The image size from the bad camera was 5,184 × 3,456 and the thumbnail was 160 X 120. I think this warning is referring to aspect ratio. Anyway, I could not see any difference in the data from both pictures, but then I am not an image expert. > > To keep this on-topic: Gimp and most other image editors have an > option to include a thumbnail when saving a JPG file. I typically > disable this option for web graphics to make the file size smaller. > > -- > Frank Gore > THE place to talk photography! > www.friendlyphotozone.com > ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] OT - Having Problems Displaying Image Thumbnails
My apologies for this OT post, but I need some help from an "image expert", and I thought the Gimp list might have one or two. When I upload images from a friend's digital camera, a Java web app is not able to create thumbnails (they appear black with the title of the image in the image area). However, clicking on the missing thumbnail renders the full image. When I upload images from a different camera, the same app generates the thumbnail and also renders the full image. Is there a special setting that camera's have to have set to allow thumbnails to be created? Both file types are jpeg. I am not seeing any error messages from the app. I have the same problem with a Python based web app that displays thumbnails of images - all the thumbnails from the one digital camera are not rendered (ie white), but the full image is displayed when I click on the thumb nail. Images from other digital camera's display both thumbnails and full images. The only reason I mention this is that the Python app (obviously) does not use the same image rendering code to generate the thumbnails, so this leads me to believe the problem is with the image itself as opposed to the Java software. I am not an "image expert", but I hope there is someone on the list who might be able to enlighten me as to why some images do not render a thumbnail and what I can do about it. Is there some JPEG setting that prevents an app from generating a thumbnail? Thanks! Mark ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Annoying Initialize Error
Having installed Gimp 2.6.10 I get this file-mgr application error box popping up - The application failed to initialize properly bla bla. I can OK to continue and no other problems occur. I did have this happen previously but found an easy method to stop it but I can't remember how or what it was I did! Am running XP SP3. Thanks for any ideas. -- Mark (via www.gimpusers.com) ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Newbie needs help making batch reflect script
I realized that this wasn't particularly descriptive. My failing script looks like this: (define (script-reflect filename) (let* ((image (car (gimp-file-load RUN-NONINTERACTIVE filename filename))) (drawable (car (gimp-image-get-active-layer image (script-fu-gimp-reflection RUN-NONINTERACTIVE image drawable 30 100 FALSE TRUE) (gimp-file-save RUN-NONINTERACTIVE image drawable filename filename) (gimp-image-delete image))) Thank you for any help, Mark On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Mark McLaren wrote: > Hi all, > > I am a Script-Fu and Scheme newbie; please forgive my ignorance. I am > trying add reflection to a batch of PNG files using the GIMP reflection > plugin from: > > http://registry.gimp.org/node/1025 > > I have previously been able to batch re-size my PNG files using a > script-autocrop script that I found on the GimpTalk forum. > > http://www.gimptalk.com/forum/script-autocrop-p265988.html > > To create a batch reflection script I have tried taking a copy of > script-autocrop, changed the definition name to match the new filename and > changed the "plug-in-autocrop" line so that it call the reflection plugin > instead, like this: > > (script-fu-gimp-reflection RUN-NONINTERACTIVE image drawable 30 100 FALSE > TRUE) > > If I run it, I get the following error: > > GIMP-Error: Calling error for procedure 'gimp-file-save': > Procedure 'gimp-file-save' has been called with an invalid ID for argument > 'draw > able'. Most likely a plug-in is trying to work on a layer that doesn't exist > any > longer. > > batch command experienced an execution error > > What am I doing wrong? Any assistance is appreciated. > > Many thanks, > > Mark > > OS: winxp > GIMP: 2.6.8 > -- "Paradoxically, the more time saving abstractions you are using the more you actually have to know." - Simon Willison ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Newbie needs help making batch reflect script
Hi all, I am a Script-Fu and Scheme newbie; please forgive my ignorance. I am trying add reflection to a batch of PNG files using the GIMP reflection plugin from: http://registry.gimp.org/node/1025 I have previously been able to batch re-size my PNG files using a script-autocrop script that I found on the GimpTalk forum. http://www.gimptalk.com/forum/script-autocrop-p265988.html To create a batch reflection script I have tried taking a copy of script-autocrop, changed the definition name to match the new filename and changed the "plug-in-autocrop" line so that it call the reflection plugin instead, like this: (script-fu-gimp-reflection RUN-NONINTERACTIVE image drawable 30 100 FALSE TRUE) If I run it, I get the following error: GIMP-Error: Calling error for procedure 'gimp-file-save': Procedure 'gimp-file-save' has been called with an invalid ID for argument 'draw able'. Most likely a plug-in is trying to work on a layer that doesn't exist any longer. batch command experienced an execution error What am I doing wrong? Any assistance is appreciated. Many thanks, Mark OS: winxp GIMP: 2.6.8 ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Text to Path.,..add color
>I have found the simple answer and I post it for anyone that might, like >myself, have over looked the obvious. > >Ignore the Tool Box and click Select and in the Drop Menu choose From Path. >Choose the color, select the fill tool and click once on the text, you'll see >the ants marching when the tect is selected. > Thank you, Bill. I tried many way to accomplish this and it appears your solution is the only one viable. -- Mark (via www.gimpusers.com) ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Edit Zoom ratios?
I do a lot of picture rendering and find myself zooming images to ratios of 3:1 and 6:1 (300% and 600%, respectively) for a majority of jobs. Can these be added to the popup menu at the bottom of the window instead of having to manually enter these values each time via View > Zoom > Other? Thank you very much. markaz -- Mark (via www.gimpusers.com) ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Genius Pensketch tablet
>I'm using a Genius Pensketch tablet 9x12 under Windows XP SP3 AMD Athlon 64x2 >dual core 4200+ to run GIMP v2.6.8 and experience a problem with the pen mouse >not drawing. The tablet mouse and all other mice draw okay. The pen mouse will >move about and select buttons but will not draw in GIMP, Inkscape or Synfig >but functions okay in Microsoft paint, Artrage and OpenOffice draw. >The input device selection does not correct the problem. >In GIMP (and Inkscape/Synfig)the moving arrow is missing on the X axis. >Anyone any ideas how to rectify this problem? > >Problem solved. I received a driver for the mouse stylus pen via KYE systems and can be downloaded from http://download.geniusnet.com/2009/Tablet/Gimp_Beta.zip> I hope this information is beneficial to other users. > > -- Mark C. (via www.gimpusers.com) ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Genius Pensketch tablet
I'm using a Genius Pensketch tablet 9x12 under Windows XP SP3 AMD Athlon 64x2 dual core 4200+ to run GIMP v2.6.8 and experience a problem with the pen mouse not drawing. The tablet mouse and all other mice draw okay. The pen mouse will move about and select buttons but will not draw in GIMP, Inkscape or Synfig but functions okay in Microsoft paint, Artrage and OpenOffice draw. The input device selection does not correct the problem. In GIMP (and Inkscape/Synfig)the moving arrow is missing on the X axis. Anyone any ideas how to rectify this problem? -- Mark C. (via www.gimpusers.com) ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Scaling and resolution
>Jaime Seuma wrote: > >See if this helps: >http://www.scantips.com/basics01.html > > Thank you for making this link available. -- Mark (via www.gimpusers.com) ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] ANNOUNCEMENT: MathMap 1.3.5
MathMap 1.3.5 = The MathMap GIMP plug-in is an image processing tool that works on several levels: * Without any prerequisite knowledge about image processing, one can use any of the more than one hundred filters that come bundled with MathMap. * More advanced users can combine filters intuitively in the Composer, a graphical user interface similar to Yahoo Pipes! and the Quartz Composer. * For expert users MathMap provides a simple but very efficient programming language. This is the core of MathMap and the language that almost all MathMap filters are implemented in. MathMap allows the generation of still images and of animations. The MathMap homepage is http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/schani/mathmap/ It provides links for downloading MathMap binaries for several Linux distributions and for Windows, as well as the source tarball. It also features a user's manual, screen-shots and many examples. There is a Google group for discussing everything related to MathMap, from questions to bug reports to feature requests, and so on: http://groups.google.com/group/mathmap --- Mark Probst ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Scaling a foto
>If I were trying to reduce the size of an image while preserving >definition I would look at changing its resolution >ie from 72pix x 72pix to 288pix x 288pix, reducing the images >apparant size (to 1/4 the starting size) while keeping all the >pixel information. > >HTH I agree with this completely. I make a lot of sigs for people that normally cannot exceed 500x200px. As such I will use many photos/pic that need to be rescaled to a much smaller object. The only way I have found to maintain clarity is to change the resolution to a much higher res. Nothing else has worked for me. Mark (via www.gimpusers.com) ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Can a default cursor be changed?
I would like to use a 'Paths' cursor that offers more precision. I currently use GIMP 2.4.7 + Windows Vista on a PC. Can the default cursor for Paths be changed to something more precise? Crosshairs, fine pointer or something similar to what is found in Photoshop would be ideal. Thank you very much in advance. -- Mark (via www.gimpusers.com) ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP on ASUS EEE 900? PLEASE HELP
If you're running XP, the standard Gimp Windows binary should work fine. If Xandros, then you should be able to instal gimp via apt-get. On 1/30/09, P AA wrote: > > Hello! I am not at all computer-savvy when it comes to > installing/downloading software. > > I would like to know if my ASUS EEE PC 900 20 Gb can use GIMP software to > enhance photos. I have Photoshop on my big computer, and would at least like > to be able to sharpen photos, adjust the lighting, and some minor > "Photoshopping" on my ASUS. I have written to ASUS and received some info, > but they suggested I write directly to GIMP. > > Can someone please help? What version of GIMP would I use, etc.? > > Thank you. > _ > Windows Live™: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect. > http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_allup_explore_012009 -- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com Mark J. Reed ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Question: How to....
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 3:04 PM, wrote: > I have Gimp 2.6. It says I need to "install the additional help package". > Where do I find the download? Wherever you downloaded the Gimp itself. :) If you installed a binary package, there should be a help package nearby. For Ubuntu Linux, "sudo apt-get install gimp-help-en" will get the English version of the help. -- Mark J. Reed ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Scaling image via the command line
I would use ImageMagick for this instead of the GIMP. $ convert -resize 600x800 source-image dest-image or $ mogrify -resize 600x800 image-to-change-in-place That's width x height, btw, which would usually be 800x600 instead of 600x800... On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 8:05 PM, David Hodson wrote: > On Sat, 2009-01-24 at 11:43 -0700, Sanjay Murthy wrote: > >> I wish to scale the 6MP images from my camera to a smaller size say >> 600x800 to be loaded into my phone. How can this be done via command >> line ? What are the switches (and arguments) to be used ? I have >> hundreds of images to be scaled. doing this with the GUI is >> impractical. > > No it isn't. Get David's Batch Processor plugin for GIMP at > > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~hodsond/dbp.html > > -- David > > > > ___ > Gimp-user mailing list > Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user > -- Mark J. Reed ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] gimp_file_load_layer(s) not found
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Sven Neumann wrote: > As far as we know GIMP 2.6.4 has less known bugs than any GIMP 2.4.x > release. As far as you know, sure. There hasn't been as much time to find bugs in 2.6.4 as there has been to find bugs in 2.4.x. I apologize for overstating; I should have said "still potentially buggy" instead of "still somewhat buggy". I love 2.6; I like the UI redesign; upgrading Gimp was what motivated me to upgrade my Ubuntu installation. But it does represent a significant change from 2.4, so I think caution is understandable at this stage. That's all I was saying. I did not intend to cast aspersions on the 2.6 line. -- Mark J. Reed ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] gimp_file_load_layer(s) not found
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Kevin Cozens wrote: > If CentOS 6 is only planning on making GIMP 2.4 available you will still have > an old version of GIMP. Gimp 2.6 is less than a year old and still somewhat buggy. I can see people trying to maintain a stable platform not wanting to jump to it yet. Especially for a desktop app in what is primarily a server distro. Also, CentOS is designed to track Red Hat, so it's probably the RH folks making the call. > You should ask them to include a current release of > GIMP. If they don't want to do that, it might be worth changing to distro that > provides more current versions of software. Perhaps, but reinstalling Linux is a lot scarier than upgrading a few packages or even upgrading to a new version of the same distro. If you're trying to do programmed image manipulation from a web app, the Gimp might not be the best choice. Have you considered alternatives? Perhaps ImageMagick? ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Outputting image
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Kate T. Yoak wrote: >> $ mknod pipe.gif p >> $ out.pl < pipe.gif > This is neat. Never encountered mknod . Thanks for passing along > something this useful! Ah, named pipes can be quite useful, mostly for one-off situations where there's a better solution that just isn't in place yet. Note that mknod is primarily for device files and doesn't actually support the "p" type for named papes on all systems; if you find one where "mknod blah p" doesn't work, try "mkfifo blah". -- Mark J. Reed ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Outputting image
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Kate T. Yoak wrote: > Here is another interesting question: is it possible to get the image > data out somewhere other than disk? Not by typing something funky in the save-as field. You could always make a named pipe, I suppose: $ mknod pipe.gif p $ out.pl < pipe.gif That will block trying to read the pipe; go to gimp and save the image to "pipe.gif" and then out.pl will start getting data... > I attempted specifying piped name > for image, "|out.pl" , for instance. It simply escapes the pipe and > creates a file by that name! Funny. :-) There's no "escaping" required. UNIX filenames can have pipes, greater-than signs, dollar signs, etc; the only two byte values that aren't allowed in a UNIX filename are zero and '/'. It's only the shell that adds special meaning to those other characters, and the shell is not involved with Gimp's saving of an image. > Once I have Gimp::Image, I would love get the binary data that is the > image and do with it as I please. Well, the binary image data doesn't exist in gimp's memory in that form; it's created by the save handler for the particular file format. I don't know if there's a way in script-fu (Scheme, Perl, or other) to have the save handler 'save' to something other than a file; someone else may have a better pointer there. -- Mark J. Reed ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Fwd: Gimp latest version
-- Forwarded message -- From: "Mark J. Reed" Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:14:33 -0500 Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp latest version To: Cristian Secară , Claus Cyrny its not the Gimp team's job to package things. If you let Ubuntu do it for you, then you have to accept the limitations that come with that. There are instructions on the web for getting gimp 2.6 to run on 8.04 without compiling it yourself, but you have to uninstall and reinstall vast swaths of the desktop gui. Why not just upgrade to 8.10? Gimp is what motivated me to do that, and it was pretty darn painless. Btw, the Ubuntu releases are Year.Month, so there can't be an 8.20. The next release will be a 9.something. On 1/16/09, Cristian Secară wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:08:04 +0100, Claus Cyrny wrote: > >> I tried this myself, but found it very difficult. IMHO, the easiest >> way would be to upgrade to Ubuntu 8.10. Then you have all the latest >> libraries installed. > > And then when GIMP goes to 2.7+ will have to upgrade also the OS to > Ubuntu 8.20+/whatever ? > > Cristi > ___ > Gimp-user mailing list > Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user > -- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com Mark J. Reed -- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com Mark J. Reed ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Help with script
The comma isn't the problem; there's nothing special about commas in Scheme strings. It's the output function you're using - (write) formats things in Scheme source-code form so they can be (eval)'ed when read back in. To just output some text as text, use (display) instead. For a single comma you could also use (write-char #\,). On 1/15/09, none wrote: > Hi again. I just have one question about the script. Well it's more about > Scheme in general but i couldn't find the answer in any tutorials (i was > probably just looking in the wrong place). Anyway, i want to write a comma > to > the file but (write "," file) writes the comma with the quotes included. And > using a character #\, doesn't work either. Is there a special escape code > for > printing commas or what? > thanks > > -- > none > ___ > Gimp-user mailing list > Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user > -- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com Mark J. Reed ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] I don't understand how GIMP treat pasted selection -- something with a floating anchor
The layer you get get when you paste is only temporary, and automatically anchors as soon as you do something layer-related. If you want a pasted image segment to become a new permanent layer, select Layer->New Layer while there's a floating selection. Note that the new layer will still only be as big as the selection you converted. And this behavior is hinted at in various places in the manual (with text like "convert the floating layer to a permanent layer"), but the only place I've seen actual instructions on how to do it is in the glossary entry for floating selection: http://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/graphics_tools/gimp_user_manual/en/glossary.html#glossary-floatingselection On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Cristian Secară wrote: > I am doing this: > - I open an ordinary .jpg file > - I choose a selection tool (say, rectangle) > - I select some small region > - copy (from menu) > - paste (from menu) > - the pasted selection appears as a "Floating Selection / (Pasted > Layer)" > - I choose the move tool > - I move the pasted layer to my desired location > - I choose a selection tool (say, elipse) > - I try to select some small region on the base layer (the original > image) > - while hovering the mouse over the image, the cursor shows an anchor > - while clicking to make the new selection, the existing layers are > combined into one single layer > > I don't understand what is this. I just want that after the first paste > action the new created layer remain there for ever, even after six or > ten thousands other further actions. I only want to combine layers when > I give the command to flatten the image. > > The tooltip over the Undo menu says "Undo Anchor Floating Selection". > I can un-anchor the layers, but then it combine back again at next move. > > How can I paste as a simple layer which can remains as is ? > I also noticed that I cannot select the layers with the mouse (in the > Layers dock window), but I can move the layer selection with the > keyboard up/down keys (but that didn't change anything for me). > > Which part of the documentation explain this ? (I didn't found this, but > maybe I looked wrong). > > Thank you, > Cristi > ___ > Gimp-user mailing list > Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user > -- Mark J. Reed ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Looking for Tutorials to Remove "Hat Shadows" on faces
I am a total beginner with Gimp. I have a digital photograph with what I would call "hat shadow". The two people are wearing hats which cast a dark shadows over their faces. How can I remove the shadows? Thanks for any links to tutorials. I have googled for fixes and haven't found anything that addresses this problem. Thanks! Mark ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Scrolling with the keyboard broken? (2.6.3 on OS X 10.5.6)
I did a cursory search to see if anyone else has this problem; apologies if I'm repeating a known bug. I've just installed 2.6.3 (I was previously running 2.4.x) using the Gimp on OS X prebuilt package. For some reason I can no longer scroll with the arrow keys. I tried resetting keyboard shortcuts; then I tried manually mapping the scroll functions to the arrow keys. Neither step helped. Nothing at all happens when I press the arrow keys. This is really slowing me down when I have to reach for the mouse to pan around a zoomed-in image. Has anyone else seen this behavior, on any platform? Any suggestions? -- Mark J. Reed ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Getting Screenshots directly into GIMP on different, operating systems
Message: 7 Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 01:22:30 +0930 From: "David Gowers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Getting Screenshots directly into GIMP on different operationg systems To: Doug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Gimp Users List Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" On 7/17/07, Doug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Akki Nitsch wrote: > >> > > Hi everybody on the list, >> > > >> > > I'm testing the GIMP on various operating systems for my masterthesis >> > > (in that i want to show the capabilities of open-source-software for >> > > technical writing) and i hope that somebody could answer me the >> > > following question (more to follow ;-) : >> > > >> > > As a programmer and technical writer for software i love the ability >> > > of getting screenshots directly from and into the GIMP via the >> > > "Acquire" submenu -> "Screen shot". >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > Hi, > > > > Irrespective of operating system, doesn't just using the 'PrintScreen' > > key, then opening the screenshot in Gimp do the trick? > > Followed by 'Crop' to taste. > Actually, no. On Linux/X11/DWM, for example, it does.. precisely nothing. Gnome includes that keybinding you mention, so it will work if you are running Gnome, but not KDE. Also-- does a Mac keyboard even HAVE a PrintScreen key? Google saith: no, it doesn't :) My experience has been completely the opposite. I run KDE on openSuse 10.2 with Gimp v. 2.2.13. Using the Print Screen key, I saved the image as .png, cropped it, saved that, and re-opened in Gimp. Ksnapshot took the screen capture almost immediately. I have not yet tried this on Windows as I resist using that OS at home; I get enough of that at work. Regards, ~Mark ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] About the replies to this list
Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 19:24:08 -0400 > From: Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] About the replies to this list > To: gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > * Victor Domingos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06-05-07 19:12]: > >> But when I do a replay-all, the author will get two copies of the >> message, since he/she is both in the To: and the Cc: fields right? >> (he's in the Cc: among the mailing list subscribers, I mean) I >> confess I usually don't use the replay-all button because I guess >> that it would have that effect. >> > > Get a mail client that has a reply-to-list function. Maybe even > answers questions after they are asked, insead of before :^ It seems different lists have a different behavior. I use Thunderbird, and in replying to this list, it put "gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU" in the "To:" field without including any others in the "CC:" fields. On another list, I get the Sender in the "To:" field and the list address in the "CC:" field. I simply click the cursor in the "To:" field, backspace it all the way out with one last time to delete the "To:" field, drop to the "CC:" field and change it to "To:" and it works perfectly, no sending two emails to the sender just one to the list. Yes, it is a little more trouble, but you'd be surprised how easy it is to make it a habit. ~Mark ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] multi-line text control
I'm using a windows version of Gimp, 2.2.1.3. I notice I don't have the capability for multiline text, which I believe is provided by the gdyntext plug in. I've been unable to find a windows version of this plug in, and cannot build it from source using MS C++. Would anyone know where to turn for this? Mark Portland, OR ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Save For Web Option?
Shawn Willden wrote: Well, if you're a non-gui fool, I'd suggest a non-gui tool. I'd use imagemagick, something like: convert infile.bmp -resize 500x500 -quality 75 outfile.jpg ImageMagick uses the file extension on the output to decide what type of image compression to use, so it will save as a JPEG. The -resize option by default will not stretch your image so the above will resize your image to be at most 500 pixels on each side. Finally the -quality is used by the JPEG compressor and takes a number between 0 and 100. Smaller numbers give you worse images, but 75 is a good tradeoff which gives you good image quality and good compression. You can easily play with the numbers to get larger or smaller image sizes. awesome If you do want to use the GIMP (certainly not a bad choice), you should use Image->Scale Image to shrink the resolution down, then Save As and enter a file name with a .jpg extension. The GIMP will then prompt you for a quality level and if you click the "Show Preview in image window" you can see the effects of dragging it back and forth, and you can also see the file size right undernath the quality slider. even more awesome Have fun, I most certainly did. Cheers, Shawn. Mark Sargent ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Save For Web Option?
Hi All, am a rather experienced Linux user for the past 2yrs or so, but, not much with Gimp. I used to use Fireworks/Photoshop on Windows some time back, and am wondering where within Gimp I can just save as for web, and it allows me to resize etc. I can't seem to find that option anywhere in the menus. All I see is, save, save as, save a copy, save as template. I have a 14.5mb file that I need to get to under 500kb or less. Could someone point this non-gui fool in the right direction? Cheers. Mark Sargent. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Re: Uninstaller?
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 12:00 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Send Gimp-user mailing list submissions to > gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Gimp-user digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > >1. Uninstaller? (Bell) > > > -- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:22:36 -0600 > From: "Bell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Gimp-user] Uninstaller? > To: > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > I am straight up a novice, I don't like the fact that now that I have The > Gimp installed, it took over any and all image folders, and will only open > them in Gimp. I do not want my windows folders, or other program folders to > be "ran" automatically through Gimp. Please help. Also, if I uninstall > Gimp, will the images that it commandeered be lost, or will they go back > where they should be with their "ME given"name? > -- next part -- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: /lists/gimp-user/attachments/20060124/dd4f141b/attachment-0001.html > > -- > > ___ > Gimp-user mailing list > Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user > First off, what has happened here is no more catastrophic than a simple file association issue. Uninstalling the Gimp is totally unnecessary just to try to correct a problem which is not really a problem. In Windows Explorer, you can simply click on "Tools" "Folder Options" and then "File Types" to look for the file extensions that you wish to re-associate with a different program. Secondly, even if you do uninstall the Gimp, you will not lose any of your images. Not even the ones you may have created with the Gimp. After all, they are just images, not an integral part of the program software itself. The uninstaller would not know of their existence. Also, they will remain with the name they were given in the location they were saved. Hope this helps. -- Mark Szymanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Problems Editing a Scanned Image
I need some help getting a scanned image into an OpenOffice document without the black speckled background. This is what I did: 1. Used XSANE 0.97 to scan the signature form my HP G95 printer/scanner. 2. Saved as tiff file. 3. Opened the tiff file in The Gimp 2.2 4. Cut the signature out of the scanned image and pasted it into a new Gimp document (so it would not be full page but just a small block). 5. Saved the document as a jpg 6. Inserted the jpg into my OpenOffice 2.0 document. 7. Printed the page with the signature on the G95 and the signature has black speckles around it. I tried setting the background to white in the saved signature file (step 5) but I still get the black speckles. They do not show up on the screen. I think I need a transparent background in the signature file, but I do not know how to make it transparent. Thanks for any help or advice you can give me. -- Mark Phillips Phillips Marketing, Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] 602 524-0376 480 945-9197 fax ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Font weight
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 19:43 +, Joao Cruz Morais wrote: > Hi, > > Im trying to type some text and bold it but can't seem to accomplish > this with the last version of Gimp. Am I missing something or this is > just not possible? > > Thank you, > João C Morais The default font for me is "Sans". If I click the button next to the font name, with images of "Aa" in that font, I get a font selection dialog. I can then select "Sans Bold" or "Sans Italic" or "Sans Bold Italic" or any of a wide range of other such fonts. YMMV. Admittedly it's not as easy as selecting a block of text and clicking a "make this bold" button; the font selection is a bit more low-level than that. -Mark Gordon, sans rant ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Re: Gimp-user Digest, Vol 35, Issue 26
Rich, I had the same problem after trying to upgrade from 2.0.2 to 2.2.8, and it turned out to be a missing libexif.50.10. That fixed it for me. Mark Szymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Send Gimp-user mailing list submissions to gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Gimp-user digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Subtracting from image (Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris) 2. Re: Subtracting from image (Axel Wernicke) 3. Re: Subtracting from image (Rikard Johnels) 4. No JPG recognized on one host: 2.2.8 (Rich Shepard) -- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:12:39 -0300 From: "Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Subtracting from image Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list Message: 1 On Wednesday 24 August 2005 14:54, Rikard Johnels wrote: Hi all! I have a "problem". I have two images taken with a few seconds difference, and i want to subtract the differences between them from one of them. Its a crowded square, with people walking around, And i want to "keep" all the stationary object, as benches etc, and remove the things that have moved. Its a experiment to "enhance" pictures taken for a panorama of populated areas. Any pointers on where to look for a solution? Well...for strcit "subtraction of an image" - the GIMP provides layer modes taht do that. Just open both your images as different layers on teh same gimp image, and change the one on the layer above to "subtract" or "difference" - that will do a subtraction on the RGB pixel value of each pixel. That is not your intended final result. But from the "difference" layer mode you should get everything that is fixed in place (ground + benchs + billboards) in black or near black (with outlines since it is little likely that the images will match exactly at pixel level), with negative or otherwise color distorted sillouetes of the moving objects (e.g. persons + dogs + vehicles) . You can then copy this "silloueted" view with "copy visible" and paste it as another layer. Then yoiu can try different ways of getting this "sillouete layer" to the layer mask of the top image, to trying to let only the parts where people appear transparent. You will need to work a lot to find good combinations of operations to do on the layer masks (you will have to blur + play with curves or levels on them) I think what you desire would be easier with three instead of two photos from the same place - or your sillouete layer will contain data of people on both photos. With three photos you have to further generate a second sillouete layer, and then combine both sillouetes to generate a suitable mask for one of your layers. It will requiere quite some experimenting - and I know this I am writing must be sounding confuse. If you have three photos of the same place, mail me (it can be reduced resolution version) of then, and I might try to document all the steps in detail. If you just have two images, send then anyway ... but it may be harder. Regards, JS -><- /Rikard ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user -- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 22:43:51 +0200 From: Axel Wernicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Subtracting from image Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: list Message: 2 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 24.08.2005 um 21:12 schrieb Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris: It will requiere quite some experimenting - and I know this I am writing must be sounding confuse. If you have three photos of the same place, mail me (it can be reduced resolution version) of then, and I might try to document all the steps in detail. If you just have two images, sen
[Gimp-user] Gimp issues with jpeg's
Discovered that my inability to open a .jpg was due to a missing libexif.50.10. After finding the right version, Gimp worked. This is, of course, updating version 2.0.2 on Novell Linux Desktop, SuSE 9.3. Never had any issue like that running Windows, but I still prefer my penguin. Mark Szymanski ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] hmmmm
On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 13:35 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > "Mark D. Montgomery II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I just downloaded and compiled gsumi and it has the same issue with > > reading the pen when not on the tablet as gimp does. > > Although it is not as bad. > > As soon as the pen is lifted out of range, it returns to normal until it > > is used to draw again. > > > > So now I'm thinking the problem isn't necessarily directly related to > > gimp, but maybe something both programs use for pressure sensitivity > > (like the wacom driver?). > > Like GDK?! Did you try testinput as found in the GTK+ source tree? > hmm. I'll try that. I just tried recompiling both gtk+ 1 and 2, and then recompiling gimp and gsumi, but that didn't do anything. Thanks. > > Sven > Mark II signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Gimp-user] hmmmm
I just downloaded and compiled gsumi and it has the same issue with reading the pen when not on the tablet as gimp does. Although it is not as bad. As soon as the pen is lifted out of range, it returns to normal until it is used to draw again. So now I'm thinking the problem isn't necessarily directly related to gimp, but maybe something both programs use for pressure sensitivity (like the wacom driver?). Mark II signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp 2.2 and Wacom Graphire3
On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 21:40 +0100, Marco wrote: > Hello, > > firstly, I got really impressed by the way this stuff has been > recognised... without editing ANYTHING the tablet could work... and I > could even do some drawings... > > the problem is: > > there is none of the 512 (i think) pressure levels active. i don't > know how this can be fixed, and I don't even know either if it is > actually a GIMP problem or not [please don't kill me]... > > as I have found nothing helpful over the net, can you suggest me some > solutions? > Did you enable the devices in File->Preferences->Input Devices->Configure Extended Input devices? I'm assuming you already set the proper configuration lines for the tablet's parts in your X config. Unless you meant that by editing nothing, you just plugged in the tablet and it worked (which I did before I setup the X config). If that is the case, you need the appropriate lines in your X config so it knows the tablet is something other than just a USB mouse. > gr33ts > :m8c: Mark II > ___ > Gimp-user mailing list > Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu > http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user > > signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Gimp-user] Graphire3 flakiness in gimp (1.2.5 and 2.0.4)
> > This seems rather arbitrary. Why is 2.0.4 considered more stable than > 2.0.6? 2.0.6 is purely minor bugfixes over 2.0.4, so if anything, 2.0.6 > should be considered more stable than 2.0.4. So this doesn't make any > sense. > hehe. No idea. I feel the same way sometimes. :) > > Gimp 2.2.0 is currently hard masked. > > > > As I dug around (and tried compiling gimp2 from the stock source), I > > discovered that gimp 2.2.x require freetype 2.1.7 or greater. > > The current stable version in gentoo is 2.1.5-r1. > > 2.1.7 is not in portage. > > 2.1.9 is masked in portage because of problems with it and Mozilla and > > Firefox being compiled with older versions. > > To install 2.1.9, you must first uninstall Mozilla and Firefox. > > For me, however, they would not recompile afterwards (I'll have to try > > again later and see if it was just a fluke). > > > > So the current state of gimp 2.2.x on gentoo seems to depend on the > > freetype/Mozilla issue. > > Except there isn't an issue with freetype 2.1.9 and mozilla. Other > distros are working happily with this combination. Again, this doesn't > make any sense. > > This didn't really clear anything up. It just looks like a bunch of > arbritrary rules not grounded in reality. > :) Who knows. Ask the developers. :) Well, I found postings in the forum about how to go about the upgrade and not break stuff (there's a slightly newer version of firefox in portage that doesn't have whatever issue the last one did), So I'm now happily running gimp 2.2.0 (2.2.2 isn't in portage yet). Unfortunately, it didn't fix my problem. :( > -Yosh Mark II signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Gimp-user] Graphire3 flakiness in gimp (1.2.5 and 2.0.4)
> > > i think we are having some problems because i dont really understand how > gentoo works. > hehe. Basically, it uses a package tree system (similar to debian I believe). When you tell it to install a package, it downloads the source and specified patches from the gentoo archives and compiles the program. When the maintainers for the specified package in the tree (for instance gimp), deem a package to be properly stable on gentoo, they set it stable. Packages that are not quite deemed stable are masked, but you can easily tell the system to try to install it anyway. This is what I did to go from 2.0.4 to 2.0.6. A package that is in the tree, but not deemed stable enough to even try to install (probably very new or has not been tested yet or depends on something funny) will be hard masked (set to masked in a file). To install these you need to unmask the package in the mask file and then tell it to install. Gimp 2.2.0 is currently hard masked. As I dug around (and tried compiling gimp2 from the stock source), I discovered that gimp 2.2.x require freetype 2.1.7 or greater. The current stable version in gentoo is 2.1.5-r1. 2.1.7 is not in portage. 2.1.9 is masked in portage because of problems with it and Mozilla and Firefox being compiled with older versions. To install 2.1.9, you must first uninstall Mozilla and Firefox. For me, however, they would not recompile afterwards (I'll have to try again later and see if it was just a fluke). So the current state of gimp 2.2.x on gentoo seems to depend on the freetype/Mozilla issue. If you can get freetype to upgrade and Mozilla/Firefox to recompile afterwards (don't want to lose those obviously), you could then try to install gimp 2.2.x and see what happens. > sorry for the lack of understanding of your distribution on my part and > if all this work does not lead to getting your tablet working. on the > other hand, many people do have their tablets working with that gimp you > have and with the current stable gimp, so perhaps the best approach for > you right now is to provide more information. > Yeah. And I believe several people in gentoo (there are posts about the graphires in the gentoo forums) are using them successfully. So the problem seems to be something with gimp on my silly computer. :) > carol Mark II signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Gimp-user] Graphire3 flakiness in gimp (1.2.5 and 2.0.4)
On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 17:29 -0800, Carol Spears wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 06:45:16PM -0500, Mark D. Montgomery II wrote: > > > > I'm using gimp 1.2.5 and 2.0.4 on gentoo with kernel 2.6.10-gentoo-r4, > > xorg-x11 6.8.0-r3, and linuxwacom 0.6.6 (including the wacom X driver). > > > > Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. > > > i suggest using gimp2. the fact that gimp-1.2.5 is working on your > system is impressive; however the release of gimp-1.2 dates back to the > year 2000 and since that time, so many many things have changed. > > carol > > > I updated from gimp 2.0.4 to 2.0.6 but it didn't make a difference. Mark II signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Gimp-user] Graphire3 flakiness in gimp (1.2.5 and 2.0.4)
I just got a new Graphire3 tablet (yay!) and have been trying to get it to work properly in gimp. It works fine in X normally. And works fine in Windows and in Photoshop Elements in Windows. However, in gimp under linux (I haven't tried in gimp for win), it does some odd things. First, after switching to the pen, it will seemingly lock the input device. The pen will only work within the drawing window (except for movement, it will move wherever). When it does this, my normal mouse cannot do anything other than move the cursor around. After much running around with the cursor in and out of the drawing window, the input is eventually released back to the system and I can switch devices (other end of pen - which will end up with same results, or my normal mouse - which will work normally, I don't use the mouse from the tablet.) or use the current end of pen as a normally (until I start drawing with it again anyhow). Second, after drawing with the pen for a short time, gimp starts reading the motion of the pen when not actually on the tablet as tool input. Basically, where I should be able to lift the pen off the tablet and use it at just a cursor to move or whatever, gimp continues to draw with it as if I was using very light pressure until the pen is out of the tablet's reading range (about 1/2 inch). Needless to say, this is rather annoying. I'm using gimp 1.2.5 and 2.0.4 on gentoo with kernel 2.6.10-gentoo-r4, xorg-x11 6.8.0-r3, and linuxwacom 0.6.6 (including the wacom X driver). Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. :) Thanks. Mark II signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
RE: [Gimp-user] GIMP hints for astrophotography tweaking
I'm fairely novice at this and this is interesting. Is this right "GAP = Gimp Animation Package". Also could briefly describe how to import multiple images into gimp with the _00X.jpg sequential filenames? Lastly how would you apply gap to change a property for all the layers, 1 expample is probably enough to get me started. Thanks, mark... >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Behalf Of Carol >Spears >Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 2:27 AM >To: Akkana Peck; GIMPUser >Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP hints for >astrophotography tweaking > > >On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 07:08:15PM -0800, Akkana Peck wrote: >> Robin Laing writes: >> > One thing that I have read is making multiple >exposures with digital >> > cameras and then adding the photos together. >> >> I don't know of a gimp plugin to do stacking, but it >would be fairly >> trivial to write. (I'm not really an >astrophotographer myself and >> have never stacked more than four images, so I >didn't look very hard >> for a plugin, nor bothered to write one.) >> >if you have images that are named sequentially (like >img_0001.jpg >img_0002.jpg), gap will make them into one single >image, with each image >being a different layer. > >you could use gap to make the changes to each image, >like changing the >transparency before making them into one layer (for >the viewing). > >carol > >___ >Gimp-user mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user > ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] GIMP hints for astrophotography tweaking
I would like to use GIMP to tweak astrophotography images. These are usually faint images of DSO (Deep Space Objects). Anyone have links to a tutorial or hints. I'm sure someone has done something with GIMP and astrophotography. Thanks, mark...
Re: [Gimp-user] flat image bg color change
I would use the path tool to trace the outline of the bottle, then change the path to a selection. Then you can float the selection and put the layer on a different background. The path tool takes a bit of practice but I think it will produce the best results in this situation. Tom wrote: Thanks Eric. Here it is. On Tuesday 02 November 2004 00:14, Eric Pierce wrote: There are a billion different ways to do what you're talking about. But it really comes down to the quality/properties of the image you have. Show us what you have. On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 01:13:21AM -0500, Tom wrote: (new to gimp) Hi, I would like to change the background color of a photo, (preferably with a gradient or shadow effect) but it's a single layer (jpg). I tried to 'select by color' and replace it, but the edges of the object in the foreground turn out jagged and looks bad. I also tried to invert the selection and cut and paste it into a new image file, but it looks just as bad. Any ideas would be appreciated. Thanks, Tom ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Fwd: Re: [Gimp-user] Text tool problem]
Hi! As I said before, I have a serious problem with the text tool: after selecting it and start typing anything, GIMP closes its windows and exits. Last time I wasn't able to answer every questions: Sven Neumann wrote: It would probably help to start gimp from an xterm (or whatever terminal emulator you prefer) and check if there's any output on the console. The output is the following: [EMAIL PROTECTED] trychydts]$ /usr/local/bin/gimp (gimp:2212): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid uninstantiatable type `' in cast to `GimpConfigInterface' (gimp:2212): Gimp-Config-CRITICAL **: file gimpconfig-utils.c: line 300 (gimp_config_sync): assertion `GIMP_IS_CONFIG (src)' failed (gimp:2212): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 1319 (g_object_ref): assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (script-fu:2213): LibGimpBase-WARNING **: script-fu: wire_read(): error Segmentation fault (core dumped) I guess that your problem is a somewhat broken font that causes problems with the libraries that handle fonts for GIMP. Does this happen with whatever font you choose? I haven't tried all, beacause I have about 300 fonts installed, but it seems to be the case. What versions of freetype and fontconfig are you using? Freetype 1.3.1, fontconfig 2.2.1 Mark Balas ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Text tool problem
Hi! Sven Neumann wrote: It would probably help to start gimp from an xterm (or whatever terminal emulator you prefer) and check if there's any output on the console. The output is the following: [EMAIL PROTECTED] trychydts]$ /usr/local/bin/gimp (gimp:2212): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid uninstantiatable type `' in cast to `GimpConfigInterface' (gimp:2212): Gimp-Config-CRITICAL **: file gimpconfig-utils.c: line 300 (gimp_config_sync): assertion `GIMP_IS_CONFIG (src)' failed (gimp:2212): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 1319 (g_object_ref): assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (script-fu:2213): LibGimpBase-WARNING **: script-fu: wire_read(): error Segmentation fault (core dumped) I guess that your problem is a somewhat broken font that causes problems with the libraries that handle fonts for GIMP. Does this happen with whatever font you choose? I haven't tried all, beacause I have about 300 fonts installed, but it seems to be the case. What versions of freetype and fontconfig are you using? How could I find this out? (Sorry for being so amateur, but I switched to Linux only three months ago.) Thanks, Mark Balas ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Text tool problem
Hi! I have just started to use Gimp 2.0.5, under Mandrake Linux 10.0. I have a really serious problem with the text tool. If I do the following: 1. Start Gimp 2. Create a new image 3. Select the text tool 4. Click on the new image 5. Start typing any text Both the image window and Gimp closes without any warning after the first 1 to 3 letters. The text I type do not appear in the "word processing" window. Thanks for any help in andvance. Mark Balas -- Balás Márk Blog, honlap: http://trychydts.freeblog.hu ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] script-fu text
>
> I seem unable to specify the font_file correctly to be able to call it in
> non-interactive mode though. The font file name is actually
> "wmb_.pfm". I've tried that, with and without the full path
> ("c:\Windows\fonts\wmb_.pfm"), and I've tried the font name by itself
> ("Myriad Bold"). I am able to select the font correctly in interactive
> mode.
>
> Any hints here?
Well, I figured this one out on my own too. In my user directory was a
dotfile (fonts-cache or something, not sitting in front of it right now)
containing the list of font files and their properties. Using the exact
text specified there for the font-file and it works. Changing the case of
a single letter, and it breaks. Just a unix/win32 difference.
--
Mark R. Andrachek, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] script-fu text
Ok, turns out, I need to do both hinting and kerning (the letter spacing
was off too). So, some searching found that I need to use
plug-in-freetype, which takes care of all of this, and produces *perfect*
text for me, at least in interactive mode.
I seem unable to specify the font_file correctly to be able to call it in
non-interactive mode though. The font file name is actually
"wmb_.pfm". I've tried that, with and without the full path
("c:\Windows\fonts\wmb_.pfm"), and I've tried the font name by itself
("Myriad Bold"). I am able to select the font correctly in interactive
mode.
Any hints here?
--
Mark R. Andrachek, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] script-fu text
I've got some script's I'm porting over from 1.2 to 2.0. (I'm using the windows version, if it makes a difference.) There have been some changes, but I've gotten the scripts working again. I had to add an alpha channel to my layers so I could raise/lower them, add gimp-edit-fill after gimp-edit-clear because of the alpha layer. I also had to change how I created my text layers, using gimp-text-fontname instead of gimp-text: (tLayer (car (gimp-text myImage -1 0 0 inText -1 TRUE 110 1 "*" "Myriad Roman" "bold" "roman" "normal" "*" "*" "*"))) Changed to: (tLayer (car (gimp-text-fontname myImage -1 0 0 inText -1 TRUE 13 1 "Myriad Bold"))) Calling it is easier (no foundry or anything to remember), and the text is close, but not close enough. I can actually get it right if I disable Hinting in the text tool options if I manually create the image, but there doesn't appear to be any way to control the hinting via script-fu. Is there some way I can set it to disabled globally so it will be disabled in script-fu too? I have to create a *lot* of these images, so help would be much appreciated! -- Mark R. Andrachek, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Help needed with Gimp Bugzilla
On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 11:05 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Any ideas on what's going on? bugzilla.gnome.org is effectively down at the moment. The machine that hosts it is being moved, IIRC. -Mark Gordon ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Re: Rotoscoping
"Sven Neumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Which begs for the question: why is current gimp not extended to > > include the film-gimp specific features? > > Who says it isn't? GAP already provides quite a lot of that > functionality (and more). Other features such as support for more > color spaces are being worked on. For me, the most important feature of filmgimp/cinepaint is the support for greater than 8 bits per color component (16 bit integer and 32 bit floating point). > The cinepaint developers clearly expressed that they are not > interested in such a merge. Last week I attended a public meeting chaired by the cinepaint project lead. I know very little about the reasons behind the cinepaint/gimp split. I do think it's unfortunate that the split is hindering the development of an open-source image editing program combining the richness and maturity of gimp 1.2/1.3/2.0 with the color precision of cinepaint. = -- MARK [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Installing gimp with libraries in a non-standard place
Title: Installing gimp with libraries in a non-standard place Hi, I am trying to install gimp-1.0.4 and when I run the configure script I get warning saying that the: aa mpeg xpm png jpeg plugins will not be built because it can not find the associated .h files. On my system these files are installed under /opt/sfw/include. Anyone know if there is a way to get configure to look somewhere else beside the standard places. I have tried different flags but have had no luck with --includedir=/opt/sfw or --with-incs-from=/opt/sfw. Thanks in advance, Mark
[Gimp-user] Running Gimp through a rlogin
Title: Running Gimp through a rlogin Hi, I am trying to use gimp to take a screenshot of the entire screen. The machine which I am trying to capture from does not have gimp installed; however, I can do a rlogin to a machine on the network that does have gimp. It freezes on my everytime I try to take the screenshot. Has anyone had luck doing a screenshot over a remote login? Thanks in advance for any insight, Mark
[Gimp-user] Paste into mask works manually but not in script
I searched the archives for this, but can't find an answer. I have a script which needs to make a layer mask in the shape of some antialiased text. I've tried many different ways, and now have something that works except for one crucial step. The step works if done manually in the GIMP, but not if done via the script. After the successful part of the script runs, I have the following layers: text layer middle layer background The middle layer is active, and its mask is active. At this point the script has copied the text layer using gimp-edit- copy. If I manually do Edit->Paste in the image window and click the anchor icon in the Layers dialog it does what I want: It copies the antialised text into the middle layer's mask. However, if I try to do the same thing in the script using gimp-edit- paste and gimp-floating-sel-anchor, the text always goes into the middle layer's image (not its mask). It even does this if I do the gimp-edit-paste in the script and the anchor manually. Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug? I'm using Gimp-Python (pygimp-1.2) for scripting, so a bug could be there or in the GIMP (gimp-1.2.3) itself. Any suggestions welcome. = -- MARK [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] script-fu, pupi-button and dynamic text
Hi, I was wondering if anyone has attempted to rewrite the pupi-button script, /usr/local/share/gimp/1.2/scripts/pupi-button.scm, (it is called Round Button under the script-fu menus) so that it either uses the Dynamic Text plugin, or so that it would use two lines of gimp-text. thanks ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Looking for another technique
Thanks Andrew. I gave this a shot but it does not seem to work ... I think maybe because the foreground and background colours are not distinct enough. I think I will look at using bezier curves ... got some reading to do! Andrew Wilson wrote: Mark, Have you tried using the threshold tool (rightclick->image->colors->threshold)? That will break the photo down into black and white based on the levels. So long as the object I want is the focus of the image is usually does pretty well. You can then use fuzzy select to change the colors to whatever you want. Regards, Andrew On Thursday 31 October 2002 02:58, Mark Drummond wrote: Going back to the desktop wallpaper I created for myself: The wallpaper utilises only two colours, one for the background and one for any graphics/objects on the background, basically a "black & white" background but using two differant colours instead of b & w. I would like to take a photographic image and convert the image to only two colours ... with the subject of the photograph (say, a person) in the foreground colour and the rest in the background colour, effectively making a silouette(sp) of the photo's subject. So basically I need to rubber band the subject of the photograph (I would assume some method of masking would be best here) and convert the photo to only the two colours I am using, but my fiddling around has so far not gotten me anywhere. Any tips? Sorry, I am an absolute novice with image editing/manipulation. I am reading some of the online gimp guides/manuals but that only gets me so far! Thanks! -- Mark Drummond Technical Specialist STANTIVE Solutions Inc. - Kingston, ON, Canada Sun Microsystems Independent Sales Organization (ISO) T] 613.634.7410 ext.226 E] [EMAIL PROTECTED] F] 613.634.7412 W] www.stantive.com ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Looking for another technique
Going back to the desktop wallpaper I created for myself: The wallpaper utilises only two colours, one for the background and one for any graphics/objects on the background, basically a "black & white" background but using two differant colours instead of b & w. I would like to take a photographic image and convert the image to only two colours ... with the subject of the photograph (say, a person) in the foreground colour and the rest in the background colour, effectively making a silouette(sp) of the photo's subject. So basically I need to rubber band the subject of the photograph (I would assume some method of masking would be best here) and convert the photo to only the two colours I am using, but my fiddling around has so far not gotten me anywhere. Any tips? Sorry, I am an absolute novice with image editing/manipulation. I am reading some of the online gimp guides/manuals but that only gets me so far! Thanks! -- Mark Drummond Technical Specialist STANTIVE Solutions Inc. - Kingston, ON, Canada Sun Microsystems Independent Sales Organization (ISO) T] 613.634.7410 ext.226 E] [EMAIL PROTECTED] F] 613.634.7412 W] www.stantive.com ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] mimicking gnome desktop feature
Excuse me while I slap myself ... must need more coffee. The effect I was looking for was embossing. Mark Drummond wrote: Nope. Maybe I can explain better. I created a desktop wallpaper for myself using the gimp. It is saved as an xcf file for further editing, and as a jpg for actual use. The machine I am doing this on is a Sun box using CDE. I use xv to set the desktop wallpaper. I want to make an addition to the wallpaper I created. Specifically, I want to take a photographic image and incorporate it into the wallpaper. That is easy enough, just add a layer to my xcf file with the photo in it, but it is the particular visual effect I want that has me lost. The effect I want is that of hammered out metal. You may have seen artistic works made of hammered out copper sheeting. That is the effect I want (but using the color of my wallpaper) which visually gives you a "hammered out 3 dimensional" view of the photograph. Mark Cruz, John J wrote: Is the same as right clicking on the mouse to change the image? john -Original Message----- From: Mark Drummond [mailto:mark.drummond@;sun.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Gimp-user] mimicking gnome desktop feature Hi all, The gnome desktop background config widget lets you (used to let you? I don't see it in my gnome control center any more) take an image and blend it into your background with a "hammered out" look. Sorry, I cannot explain it better. I want to mimic that effect with the gimp. I have a desktop background and I would like to blend a photo into the background. The idea is for the photo to have that hammered out (like an image made of hammered out copper) look using the existing background color. Any ideas? -- Mark Drummond Technical Specialist STANTIVE Solutions Inc. - Kingston, ON, Canada Sun Microsystems Independent Sales Organization (ISO) T] 613.634.7410 ext.226 E] [EMAIL PROTECTED] F] 613.634.7412 W] www.stantive.com ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] mimicking gnome desktop feature
Nope. Maybe I can explain better. I created a desktop wallpaper for myself using the gimp. It is saved as an xcf file for further editing, and as a jpg for actual use. The machine I am doing this on is a Sun box using CDE. I use xv to set the desktop wallpaper. I want to make an addition to the wallpaper I created. Specifically, I want to take a photographic image and incorporate it into the wallpaper. That is easy enough, just add a layer to my xcf file with the photo in it, but it is the particular visual effect I want that has me lost. The effect I want is that of hammered out metal. You may have seen artistic works made of hammered out copper sheeting. That is the effect I want (but using the color of my wallpaper) which visually gives you a "hammered out 3 dimensional" view of the photograph. Mark Cruz, John J wrote: Is the same as right clicking on the mouse to change the image? john -Original Message----- From: Mark Drummond [mailto:mark.drummond@;sun.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Gimp-user] mimicking gnome desktop feature Hi all, The gnome desktop background config widget lets you (used to let you? I don't see it in my gnome control center any more) take an image and blend it into your background with a "hammered out" look. Sorry, I cannot explain it better. I want to mimic that effect with the gimp. I have a desktop background and I would like to blend a photo into the background. The idea is for the photo to have that hammered out (like an image made of hammered out copper) look using the existing background color. Any ideas? -- Mark Drummond Technical Specialist STANTIVE Solutions Inc. - Kingston, ON, Canada Sun Microsystems Independent Sales Organization (ISO) T] 613.634.7410 ext.226 E] [EMAIL PROTECTED] F] 613.634.7412 W] www.stantive.com ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] mimicking gnome desktop feature
Hi all, The gnome desktop background config widget lets you (used to let you? I don't see it in my gnome control center any more) take an image and blend it into your background with a "hammered out" look. Sorry, I cannot explain it better. I want to mimic that effect with the gimp. I have a desktop background and I would like to blend a photo into the background. The idea is for the photo to have that hammered out (like an image made of hammered out copper) look using the existing background color. Any ideas? -- Mark Drummond Technical Specialist STANTIVE Solutions Inc. - Kingston, ON, Canada Sun Microsystems Independent Sales Organization (ISO) T] 613.634.7410 ext.226 E] [EMAIL PROTECTED] F] 613.634.7412 W] www.stantive.com ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
