Re: Sidebar patch - where can I find user instructions for using it?
I'll piggy back on this issue, I hope it's alright. repo-installed-patched mutt on Ubuntu Mutt 1.5.24 (2015-08-30) I can't make the sidebar pick a folder from my IMAP server. It errors out with something like: "no such folder ... /home/$user/Maildir" Honestly, it's been two years since I've used the sidebar, and back then it was per the tip from Lunar, and I used local Maildir. Should the patch work with an IMAP connection ? Thank you. On Thu,Sep 08 01:41:PM, Jon LaBadie wrote: > Useful indeed. However there are several differences from the > cited webpage and my instance of 1.7.0 (Fedora 24). > > Some examples: > > toggle sidebar_visible can use > sidebar-toggle-visible > > sidebar-scroll-up and sidebar-scroll-down are > sidebar-page-up and sidebar-page-down > > in addition to sidebar-next and sidebar-prev there are also > sidebar-next-new and sidebar-prev-new > > jon -- Guy Gold Cambridge, Massachusetts
Re: Sidebar patch - where can I find user instructions for using it?
On 07/09/16 at 03:50pm, Chris Green wrote: > I have a login (as in ssh login) account on a system where they have > just changed to using mutt with the sidebar patch. It's mutt 1.5.23 > on a Debian 8 system. > Debian updating mutt to neomutt. "This package is built with the NeoMutt patchset,..." https://packages.debian.org/stretch/mutt -- Marcelo
Re: Sidebar patch - where can I find user instructions for using it?
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:03:44AM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 02:32:46AM +0200, Jostein Berntsen wrote: > > On 07.09.16,15:50, Chris Green wrote: > > > I have a login (as in ssh login) account on a system where they have > > > just changed to using mutt with the sidebar patch. It's mutt 1.5.23 > > > on a Debian 8 system. > > > > > > Are there instructions for using the patch anywhere? I use mutt > > > (unpatched) at home so I know all the basics but at the moment I can't > > > make the sidebar do anything. > > > > > > > Check the Documentation section in this link: > > > > http://www.lunar-linux.org/mutt-sidebar/ > > > > THe sidebar is also now a standard feature in the new mutt 1.7.0: > > > > http://www.mutt.org/doc/UPDATING > > > OK, thanks, just what I needed. > Useful indeed. However there are several differences from the cited webpage and my instance of 1.7.0 (Fedora 24). Some examples: toggle sidebar_visible can use sidebar-toggle-visible sidebar-scroll-up and sidebar-scroll-down are sidebar-page-up and sidebar-page-down in addition to sidebar-next and sidebar-prev there are also sidebar-next-new and sidebar-prev-new jon -- Jon H. LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com 11226 South Shore Rd. (703) 787-0688 (H) Reston, VA 20190 (703) 935-6720 (C)
Re: Sidebar patch - where can I find user instructions for using it?
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 02:32:46AM +0200, Jostein Berntsen wrote: > On 07.09.16,15:50, Chris Green wrote: > > I have a login (as in ssh login) account on a system where they have > > just changed to using mutt with the sidebar patch. It's mutt 1.5.23 > > on a Debian 8 system. > > > > Are there instructions for using the patch anywhere? I use mutt > > (unpatched) at home so I know all the basics but at the moment I can't > > make the sidebar do anything. > > > > Check the Documentation section in this link: > > http://www.lunar-linux.org/mutt-sidebar/ > > THe sidebar is also now a standard feature in the new mutt 1.7.0: > > http://www.mutt.org/doc/UPDATING > OK, thanks, just what I needed. -- Chris Green
Re: Sidebar patch - where can I find user instructions for using it?
On 07.09.16,15:50, Chris Green wrote: I have a login (as in ssh login) account on a system where they have just changed to using mutt with the sidebar patch. It's mutt 1.5.23 on a Debian 8 system. Are there instructions for using the patch anywhere? I use mutt (unpatched) at home so I know all the basics but at the moment I can't make the sidebar do anything. Check the Documentation section in this link: http://www.lunar-linux.org/mutt-sidebar/ THe sidebar is also now a standard feature in the new mutt 1.7.0: http://www.mutt.org/doc/UPDATING Jostein
Sidebar patch - where can I find user instructions for using it?
I have a login (as in ssh login) account on a system where they have just changed to using mutt with the sidebar patch. It's mutt 1.5.23 on a Debian 8 system. Are there instructions for using the patch anywhere? I use mutt (unpatched) at home so I know all the basics but at the moment I can't make the sidebar do anything. -- Chris Green
[soved] Re: Sidebar-patch on OS X with homebrew won't work
On 5 Dec 2013, at 10:50, Niels Kobschätzki wrote: > Hi, > > I compiled mutt on OS X with homebrew with --with-sidebar-patch. > Unfortunately the sidebar won't come up. I found an example > configuration-file for the sidebar-patch in the net but when sourcing it, I > get only errors > Any ideas what the problem could be? I found the problem. In the current formular the sidebar-patch is not included and I had to add it manually 1. brew edit mutt 2. Added to line 31: option "with-sidebar-patch", "Apply sidebar patch" 3. Added to line 45: ['with-sidebar-patch', 'https://raw.github.com/nedos/mutt-sidebar-pa tch/master/mutt-sidebar.patch'], Then I could install it with brew install --with-sidebar-patch Niels signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Sidebar-patch on OS X with homebrew won't work
Hi, I compiled mutt on OS X with homebrew with --with-sidebar-patch. Unfortunately the sidebar won't come up. I found an example configuration-file for the sidebar-patch in the net but when sourcing it, I get only errors The code of the sidebar-file is: # -*- muttrc -*- # # Sidebar settings for mutt. # # $Id: sidebar 16 2007-03-09 19:52:41Z vdanen $ set sidebar_width=26 set sidebar_visible=yes set sidebar_delim='|' # which mailboxes to list in the sidebar (list them all) mailboxes =Inbox =Inbox-annvix # color of folders with new mail color sidebar_new yellow default # alt-n, alt-p to select next/prev folder # alt-o to open selected folder (doesn't seem to work??) bind index \epsideb ar-prev bind index \ensidebar-next bind index \eosidebar-open bind pa ger \epsidebar-prev bind pager \ensidebar-next bind pager \eosidebar -open # I don't need these. just for documentation purposes. See below. # sidebar-scroll-up # sidebar-scroll-down # b toggles sidebar visibility macro index b 'toggle sidebar_visible' macro pager b 'toggle sidebar_visible' # Remap bounce-message function to "B" bind index B bounce-message # # Mario Holbe suggests: # macro index b 'toggle sidebar_visible' # macro pager b 'toggle # sidebar_visible' # When I source it, I get the following errors: Error in /Users/user/.mutt/sidebar, line 7: sidebar_width: unknown variable Error in /Users/user/.mutt/sidebar, line 8: sidebar_visible: unknown variable Error in /Users/user/.mutt/sidebar, line 9: sidebar_delim: unknown variable Error in /Users/user/.mutt/sidebar, line 15: sidebar_new: no such object Error in /Users/user/.mutt/sidebar, line 19: ar-prev: no such function in map Error in /Users/user/.mutt/sidebar, line 20: Error in /Users/user/.mutt/sidebar, line 21: Error in /Users/user/.mutt/sidebar, line 22: pa: no such menu Error in /Users/user/.mutt/sidebar, line 23: Error in /Users/user/.mutt/sidebar, line 24: -open: no such function in map Error in /Users/user/.mutt/muttrc, line 4: source: errors in /Users/user/.mutt/sidebar source: errors in /Users/user/.mutt/muttrc Any ideas what the problem could be? Niels signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: sidebar patch
James Griffin wrote: > I believe Fedora/Redhat systems have a similar way of selecting > which package/program should be your default using an > "alternatives-type" command. Useful for Linux users. At the risk of drifting too far from topic, yes, Red Hat / Fedora does have alternatives. It appears to me to be a port-then-rewrite of the Debian tool. But they use it for completely different purposes. They use it to control the choice of MTA and a few other high level system choices. On Debian only one of Postfix, Exim, Sendmail would be installed at a time so no chooser is needed between them to arbitrate who gets /usr/sbin/sendmail. It is whichever one is installed. But on Fedora/RH both Postfix and Sendmail are both typically installed at the same time. They use the alternatives to select which one is active gets control of /usr/sbin/sendmail (using the "mta" tag). (And along with chkconfig to determine which one starts and gets port 25.) AFAICS on Fedora/RH the alternatives system isn't used for user seen behavior such as /usr/bin/mutt selection and is pretty sparingly used in general. Bob signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: sidebar patch
Hi Marco! On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Marco wrote: > On 2013–02–12 Bob Proulx wrote: > > > Some time ago I posted this following in a discussion about the Debian > > alternatives and it includes a walkthrough of how alternatives are > > used and configured. I think it is still relevant. Perhaps it will > > help others understand how the alternatives work. > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2002/08/msg02808.html > > Is it possible to set up the alternatives on a per user base? No. But you can use alias or symlinks or shell scripts or whatever you prefer. regards, Christian -- Eight was also the Number of Bel-Shamharoth, which was why a sensible wizard would never mention the number if he could avoid it. Or you'll be eight alive, apprentices were jocularly warned. Bel-Shamharoth was especially attracted to dabblers in magic who, by being as it were beachcombers on the shores of the unnatural, were already half-enmeshed in his nets. Rincewind's room number in his hall of residence had been 7a. He hadn't been surprised. -- Terry Pratchett, "The Sending of Eight"
Re: sidebar patch
On 2013–02–12 Bob Proulx wrote: > Some time ago I posted this following in a discussion about the Debian > alternatives and it includes a walkthrough of how alternatives are > used and configured. I think it is still relevant. Perhaps it will > help others understand how the alternatives work. > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2002/08/msg02808.html Is it possible to set up the alternatives on a per user base? Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: sidebar patch
- Bob Proulx [2013-02-12 18:16:11 -0700] - : > Luis Mochan wrote: > > my system, /usr/bin/mutt is a link pointing to > > /etc/alternatives/mutt. Furthermore, /etc/alternatives/mutt is a link > > pointing to /usr/bin/mutt-patched, which is the actual binary for the > > ...nice description of alternatives... > > Some time ago I posted this following in a discussion about the Debian > alternatives and it includes a walkthrough of how alternatives are > used and configured. I think it is still relevant. Perhaps it will > help others understand how the alternatives work. > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2002/08/msg02808.html > > Don't be confused by the topic of vi, nvi, vim, elvis differences. > That is the just carrier wave upon which the Debian alternatives topic > is discussed. Just scroll down a page past that and look at the > walkthrough part. > > Bob > > P.S. Wow. Time flies! Indeed it does! I believe Fedora/Redhat systems have a similar way of selecting which package/program should be your default using an "alternatives-type" command. Useful for Linux users. In fact, I belive Macports also has a similar way of selecting "ports" the user might prefer. I do use Macports but hardly use my Mac now, other than to watch tv. If anyone wants to buy a Mac mini, Core i5 dual-core, 4G RAM let me know LOL. It's become pretty redundant to me now. Jamie. -- Primary Key: 4096R/1D31DC38 2011-12-03 Key Fingerprint: A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38
Re: sidebar patch
Luis Mochan wrote: > my system, /usr/bin/mutt is a link pointing to > /etc/alternatives/mutt. Furthermore, /etc/alternatives/mutt is a link > pointing to /usr/bin/mutt-patched, which is the actual binary for the > ...nice description of alternatives... Some time ago I posted this following in a discussion about the Debian alternatives and it includes a walkthrough of how alternatives are used and configured. I think it is still relevant. Perhaps it will help others understand how the alternatives work. http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2002/08/msg02808.html Don't be confused by the topic of vi, nvi, vim, elvis differences. That is the just carrier wave upon which the Debian alternatives topic is discussed. Just scroll down a page past that and look at the walkthrough part. Bob P.S. Wow. Time flies! signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: sidebar patch
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 22:22:35 -0600, Luis Mochan wrote: > I guess there is still some confusion. When you installed > mutt-patched, mutt was overwritten. The same thing happened to me. In > my system, /usr/bin/mutt is a link pointing to > /etc/alternatives/mutt. Furthermore, /etc/alternatives/mutt is a link > pointing to /usr/bin/mutt-patched, which is the actual binary for the > patched version of mutt. Using the command update-alternatives as I > mentioned a couple of messages ago, this link may be replaced by a > link to /usr/bin/mutt-org, which is the binary for the unpatched > mutt. Thus I can experiment alternating freely between mutt-patched > and mutt (unpatched) without having to uninstall either. I use Debian, > but I understand that the 'alternatives' system is available in Ubuntu > also. (Note also that the alternates system is used only to determine which version of the program the "mutt" command invokes -- you can always just run "mutt-org" or "mutt-patched" explicitly to pick one or the other for a particular run.) Nathan
Re: sidebar patch
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:22:35PM -0600, Luis Mochan wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 09:22:20AM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > > ... > > > I guess there is some confusion: Synaptic, like aptitude and apt-get, > > > is for installing and removing packages. Update-alternatives is to > > > choose which program to use when you have several programs installed > > > that offer similar functionality, such as the patched and the > > > un-patched versions of mutt. You may install both using synaptics and > > > then choose which one to use (by default) without uninstalling the > > > other. > > > > No, that is not how it worked. I had the normal mutt for months. > > Yesterday I installed mutt-patched and it overwrote mutt. It was just a > > link to mutt-patched. Am I missing something? > > > Dear Brian, > > I guess there is still some confusion. When you installed > mutt-patched, mutt was overwritten. The same thing happened to me. In > my system, /usr/bin/mutt is a link pointing to > /etc/alternatives/mutt. Furthermore, /etc/alternatives/mutt is a link > pointing to /usr/bin/mutt-patched, which is the actual binary for the > patched version of mutt. Using the command update-alternatives as I > mentioned a couple of messages ago, this link may be replaced by a > link to /usr/bin/mutt-org, which is the binary for the unpatched > mutt. Thus I can experiment alternating freely between mutt-patched > and mutt (unpatched) without having to uninstall either. I use Debian, > but I understand that the 'alternatives' system is available in Ubuntu > also. > > Best regards, > Luis Many thanks. I understand it now. It is indeed like your describe in Ubuntu. I had just not come across this alternates idea before. Brian. -- "Rectify the anomaly". The worst slogan used by an education trade union. Brian Salter-Duke (Brian Duke) Email: b_duke(AT)bigpond(DOT)net(DOT)au
Re: sidebar patch
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 09:22:20AM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > ... > > I guess there is some confusion: Synaptic, like aptitude and apt-get, > > is for installing and removing packages. Update-alternatives is to > > choose which program to use when you have several programs installed > > that offer similar functionality, such as the patched and the > > un-patched versions of mutt. You may install both using synaptics and > > then choose which one to use (by default) without uninstalling the > > other. > > No, that is not how it worked. I had the normal mutt for months. > Yesterday I installed mutt-patched and it overwrote mutt. It was just a > link to mutt-patched. Am I missing something? > Dear Brian, I guess there is still some confusion. When you installed mutt-patched, mutt was overwritten. The same thing happened to me. In my system, /usr/bin/mutt is a link pointing to /etc/alternatives/mutt. Furthermore, /etc/alternatives/mutt is a link pointing to /usr/bin/mutt-patched, which is the actual binary for the patched version of mutt. Using the command update-alternatives as I mentioned a couple of messages ago, this link may be replaced by a link to /usr/bin/mutt-org, which is the binary for the unpatched mutt. Thus I can experiment alternating freely between mutt-patched and mutt (unpatched) without having to uninstall either. I use Debian, but I understand that the 'alternatives' system is available in Ubuntu also. Best regards, Luis
Re: sidebar patch
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 03:55:09PM -0600, Luis Mochan wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 08:29:29AM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > > ... > > > > > > Under Debian you could run > > > > > > sudo update-alternatives --config mutt > > > > > > to choose which mutt (patched or not) to run by default. I guess that > > > Ubuntu is similar. Thus, it was not really necessary to > > > uninstall/reinstall in order to test and choose among the two mutt > > > versions. Of > > > course, you already did... > > > > Indeed. I used the synaptic package manager. That is probably more > > simple minded than updating from a prompt in the terminal. Nevertheless > > it is very easy to use. > > > > I guess there is some confusion: Synaptic, like aptitude and apt-get, > is for installing and removing packages. Update-alternatives is to > choose which program to use when you have several programs installed > that offer similar functionality, such as the patched and the > un-patched versions of mutt. You may install both using synaptics and > then choose which one to use (by default) without uninstalling the > other. No, that is not how it worked. I had the normal mutt for months. Yesterday I installed mutt-patched and it overwrote mutt. It was just a link to mutt-patched. Am I missing something? Brian. > Regards, > Luis > > > -- > > o > W. Luis Mochán, | tel:(52)(777)329-1734 /<(*) > Instituto de Ciencias Físicas, UNAM | fax:(52)(777)317-5388 `>/ /\ > Apdo. Postal 48-3, 62251 | (*)/\/ \ > Cuernavaca, Morelos, México | moc...@fis.unam.mx /\_/\__/ > GPG: DD344B85, 2ADC B65A 5499 C2D3 4A3B 93F3 AE20 0F5E DD34 4B85 > -- A child of five could understand this! Fetch me a child of five. -- Marx (guess which one) Brian Salter-Duke (Brian Duke) Email: b_duke(AT)bigpond(DOT)net(DOT)au
Re: sidebar patch
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 08:29:29AM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > ... > > > > Under Debian you could run > > > > sudo update-alternatives --config mutt > > > > to choose which mutt (patched or not) to run by default. I guess that > > Ubuntu is similar. Thus, it was not really necessary to > > uninstall/reinstall in order to test and choose among the two mutt > > versions. Of > > course, you already did... > > Indeed. I used the synaptic package manager. That is probably more > simple minded than updating from a prompt in the terminal. Nevertheless > it is very easy to use. > I guess there is some confusion: Synaptic, like aptitude and apt-get, is for installing and removing packages. Update-alternatives is to choose which program to use when you have several programs installed that offer similar functionality, such as the patched and the un-patched versions of mutt. You may install both using synaptics and then choose which one to use (by default) without uninstalling the other. Regards, Luis -- o W. Luis Mochán, | tel:(52)(777)329-1734 /<(*) Instituto de Ciencias Físicas, UNAM | fax:(52)(777)317-5388 `>/ /\ Apdo. Postal 48-3, 62251 | (*)/\/ \ Cuernavaca, Morelos, México | moc...@fis.unam.mx /\_/\__/ GPG: DD344B85, 2ADC B65A 5499 C2D3 4A3B 93F3 AE20 0F5E DD34 4B85
Re: sidebar patch
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 03:16:08PM -0600, Luis Mochan wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 08:02:39AM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 09:53:17AM +0100, Scott Stevenson wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 06:56:46AM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > > > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 06:46:11PM +0100, Scott Stevenson wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 07:52:57PM +0530, dexter wrote: > > > > > > ... > > easier to use mutt without it. Unfortunately installing mutt-patched > > installed /usr/bin/mutt-patched but overwrote /usr/bin/mutt to be a soft > > link to mutt-patched. I had to uninstall mutt-patched and then reinstall > > mutt to get rid of the sidebar. Back to normal now. > > > > Under Debian you could run > > sudo update-alternatives --config mutt > > to choose which mutt (patched or not) to run by default. I guess that > Ubuntu is similar. Thus, it was not really necessary to > uninstall/reinstall in order to test and choose among the two mutt versions. > Of > course, you already did... Indeed. I used the synaptic package manager. That is probably more simple minded than updating from a prompt in the terminal. Nevertheless it is very easy to use. Brian. > Best regards, > Luis > > > -- > > o > W. Luis Mochán, | tel:(52)(777)329-1734 /<(*) > Instituto de Ciencias Físicas, UNAM | fax:(52)(777)317-5388 `>/ /\ > Apdo. Postal 48-3, 62251 | (*)/\/ \ > Cuernavaca, Morelos, México | moc...@fis.unam.mx /\_/\__/ > GPG: DD344B85, 2ADC B65A 5499 C2D3 4A3B 93F3 AE20 0F5E DD34 4B85 > -- "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Gandhi, being prophetic about Linux. Brian Salter-Duke (Brian Duke) Email: b_duke(AT)bigpond(DOT)net(DOT)au
Re: sidebar patch
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 08:02:39AM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 09:53:17AM +0100, Scott Stevenson wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 06:56:46AM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 06:46:11PM +0100, Scott Stevenson wrote: > > > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 07:52:57PM +0530, dexter wrote: > > > > > ... > easier to use mutt without it. Unfortunately installing mutt-patched > installed /usr/bin/mutt-patched but overwrote /usr/bin/mutt to be a soft > link to mutt-patched. I had to uninstall mutt-patched and then reinstall > mutt to get rid of the sidebar. Back to normal now. > Under Debian you could run sudo update-alternatives --config mutt to choose which mutt (patched or not) to run by default. I guess that Ubuntu is similar. Thus, it was not really necessary to uninstall/reinstall in order to test and choose among the two mutt versions. Of course, you already did... Best regards, Luis -- o W. Luis Mochán, | tel:(52)(777)329-1734 /<(*) Instituto de Ciencias Físicas, UNAM | fax:(52)(777)317-5388 `>/ /\ Apdo. Postal 48-3, 62251 | (*)/\/ \ Cuernavaca, Morelos, México | moc...@fis.unam.mx /\_/\__/ GPG: DD344B85, 2ADC B65A 5499 C2D3 4A3B 93F3 AE20 0F5E DD34 4B85
Re: sidebar patch
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 09:53:17AM +0100, Scott Stevenson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 06:56:46AM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 06:46:11PM +0100, Scott Stevenson wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 07:52:57PM +0530, dexter wrote: > > > > I'm new to mutt, just installed one and getting > > > > to know it, how do i get sidebar in mutt, google > > > > search tells me that i have to apply a patch, > > > > i'm running on ubuntu, where can i get this patch? > > > > > > Debian and derivatives such as Ubuntu provide a `mutt-patched` package, > > > which includes the sidebar patch. > > > > I have Ubuntu 12.04 and Mutt 1.5.21 (2010-09-15) unmodified by me. It > > does not have the sidebar patch as far as I can see. > > Then I suspect you have the `mutt` package [0] installed rather than > `mutt-patched` [1]. The sidebar patch is only included in the latter. > > [0] http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/mail/mutt > [1] http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/mail/mutt-patched Yes, you are right. mutt has a whole lot of patches included, so I did not think to look for a more patched version. I have long been wary about the sidebar patch but had never tried it. I now understand why it is not included in the main release and I fully support that. It is easier to use mutt without it. Unfortunately installing mutt-patched installed /usr/bin/mutt-patched but overwrote /usr/bin/mutt to be a soft link to mutt-patched. I had to uninstall mutt-patched and then reinstall mutt to get rid of the sidebar. Back to normal now. Brian. > -- > Scott Stevenson -- I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much, of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end. -- Douglas Adams Brian Salter-Duke (Brian Duke) Email: b_duke(AT)bigpond(DOT)net(DOT)au
Re: sidebar patch
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 06:56:46AM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 06:46:11PM +0100, Scott Stevenson wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 07:52:57PM +0530, dexter wrote: > > > I'm new to mutt, just installed one and getting > > > to know it, how do i get sidebar in mutt, google > > > search tells me that i have to apply a patch, > > > i'm running on ubuntu, where can i get this patch? > > > > Debian and derivatives such as Ubuntu provide a `mutt-patched` package, > > which includes the sidebar patch. > > I have Ubuntu 12.04 and Mutt 1.5.21 (2010-09-15) unmodified by me. It > does not have the sidebar patch as far as I can see. Then I suspect you have the `mutt` package [0] installed rather than `mutt-patched` [1]. The sidebar patch is only included in the latter. [0] http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/mail/mutt [1] http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/mail/mutt-patched -- Scott Stevenson signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: sidebar patch
On Feb 10, Scott Stevenson wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 07:52:57PM +0530, dexter wrote: > > I'm new to mutt, just installed one and getting > > to know it, how do i get sidebar in mutt, google > > search tells me that i have to apply a patch, > > i'm running on ubuntu, where can i get this patch? >From a terminal:: sudo apt-get install mutt-patched Its in your repository. You probably also want to install mutt-print if you plan on printing out any mail. Ed
Re: sidebar patch
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 06:46:11PM +0100, Scott Stevenson wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 07:52:57PM +0530, dexter wrote: > > I'm new to mutt, just installed one and getting > > to know it, how do i get sidebar in mutt, google > > search tells me that i have to apply a patch, > > i'm running on ubuntu, where can i get this patch? > > Debian and derivatives such as Ubuntu provide a `mutt-patched` package, > which includes the sidebar patch. I have Ubuntu 12.04 and Mutt 1.5.21 (2010-09-15) unmodified by me. It does not have the sidebar patch as far as I can see. Brian. > -- > Scott Stevenson -- "There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home." --Ken Olson, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corp., 1977 Brian Salter-Duke (Brian Duke) Email: b_duke(AT)bigpond(DOT)net(DOT)au
Re: sidebar patch
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 07:52:57PM +0530, dexter wrote: > I'm new to mutt, just installed one and getting > to know it, how do i get sidebar in mutt, google > search tells me that i have to apply a patch, > i'm running on ubuntu, where can i get this patch? Debian and derivatives such as Ubuntu provide a `mutt-patched` package, which includes the sidebar patch. -- Scott Stevenson signature.asc Description: Digital signature
sidebar patch
Hi, I'm new to mutt, just installed one and getting to know it, how do i get sidebar in mutt, google search tells me that i have to apply a patch, i'm running on ubuntu, where can i get this patch? -dexter
some ideas about mutt sidebar patch
I have use sidebar path for a long time.
Now I find it can be improved with some features.
1. Change the flag emails number with new emails reply to me or my thread.
Detail:
Mutt sidebar path has three number 100(90)[3].
The `100` is the all emails number.
The `(90)` is the new emails number.
The `[3]` is the [!] flagged emails number.
I think the flagged emails number is not so important. Usually I will n=
ot go=20
to see how much flagged emails in mailbox. I would prefer to see how ma=
ny=20
new emails which reply only to me or reply to my send emails (thread in=
a=20
mailing list).
2. I have subscribed many mailing list, and have some other separate mailbo=
xes. =20
Just in order to categories them.
I find it is too long for sidebar now.
When I press to scroll down. sidebar can not display one mailbox w=
hen=20
scroll a page.
mailbox
mailbox
mailbox
--- next page
mailbox (when scroll, this mailbox can not be displayed.)
mailbox
mailbox
mailbox
So I think sidebar path should some feature like collapse a mailbox gro=
up.
e.g.
Vim
anon
dev
user
can be collapsed to:
Vim+
This is all I suggest.
If you have any thinks on my two ideas, please tell.
And of course, I can not write code for sidebar. I'm just a user.
(Because if I can write code, I will write by myself.)
--
[ stardiviner ] ^^&^^ {I hate all of you ! Leave me alone}
IRC(freenode): stardiviner \\ Twitter: @numbchild \\
GnuPG Key fingerprint
>>> 9BAA 92BC CDDD B9EF 3B36 CB99 B8C4 B8E5 47C3 2433
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
mutt with sidebar patch: problems with display followed by segfault
Hello,
I have mutt with sidebar patch configured for two account in such a
way so it will change sidebar when changing the account. Unfortunately
I'm experiencing strange problems with display which are followed by
segfault. Its difficult to explain so I did a screen cast to
illustrate the issue [1]. Please notice how after mutt's segfault even
output of simple 'ls -l' command is distorted.
I tried 'mutt-sidebar' [2] and 'uber-mutt' [3] from AUR (both using
different sidebar patches) but the issue persists. Mutt's behaviour is
the same regardless of using it under terminal without X-windows,
urxvt or tmux.
Content of my muttrc:
set alias_file = ${MUTTDIR}/aliases
set mailcap_path = ${MUTTDIR}/mailcap
set tmpdir = ${MUTTDIR}/temp
source ${MUTTDIR}/aliases
source ${MUTTDIR}/macros
set mbox_type = Maildir
set folder = ~/mail
set spoolfile = +gmail/INBOX
set auto_tag
unset beep
set beep_new
unset confirmappend
set delete
unset markers
unset mark_old
set menu_scroll
set pager_context = 5
set pager_index_lines = 10
set pager_stop
set reverse_alias
set sendmail_wait = -1
set sort = threads
set sort_aux = reverse-last-date-received
unset sort_re
set thorough_search
set thread_received
set tilde
set timeout= 3
unset use_domain
unset wait_key
unset wrap_search
set sidebar_width = 25
set sidebar_visible= yes
set sidebar_delim = '|'
bind index \Cp sidebar-prev
bind index \Cn sidebar-next
bind index \Co sidebar-open
bind pager \Cp sidebar-prev
bind pager \Cn sidebar-next
bind pager \Co sidebar-open
auto_viewtext/html
alternative_ordertext/plain text/enriched text/html
set alias_format = "%4n %t %-20a %r"
set compose_format = "──| %v : Compose |/ Approx. msg
size: %l Atts. %a /%>─"
set date_format= "%m/%d/%y@%H:%M"
set forward_format = "Fwd: %s"
set index_format = "%3C %Z %D %-17.17F %s"
set quote_regexp = "^( {0,4}[>|:#%]| {0,4}[a-z0-9]+[>|]+)+"
set reply_regexp = "^(([Rr][Ee]?(\[[0-9]+\])?: *)?(\[[^]]+\] *)?)*"
set status_format = "-%r- %v ───/ %f %m%?n? [+%n]?%?d?
[-%d]?%?t? [*%t]? /%?p?───/ %p waiting to send /?─%>─(%P)───"
set abort_nosubject
set autoedit
set edit_headers
set forward_quote
set include
set realname= "Me"
set reply_to
set reverse_name
unset user_agent
ignore *
unignore from: to: cc: date: subject:
hdr_order from: to: cc: date: subject:
folder-hook gmail/* source ${MUTTDIR}/accounts/gmail
folder-hook two/* source ${MUTTDIR}/accounts/two
subscribe offlineimap-project mutt-users
folder-hook two/lists/(offlineimap|mutt-users|) "exec collapse-all"
Content of settings form specific accounts (both are almost the same
so here is just one):
color status green default
set from= 'Me '
set sendmail= "/usr/bin/msmtpq -a gmail"
unmailboxes *
mailboxes = +gmail/INBOX +gmail/spam +gmail/drafts
+gmail/bin +gmail/sent +gmail/archive
set postponed = +gmail/drafts
set record = +gmail/sent
set trash = +gmail/bin
set signature = ${MUTTDIR}/sigs/gmail.sig
macro index ,c "+two/INBOX" "change accounts"
macro index S "+gmail/spam" "mark message as spam"
I tried stripping muttrc to bare minimum, like so:
set mbox_type = Maildir
set folder = ~/mail
set spoolfile = +gmail/INBOX
set sidebar_width = 25
set sidebar_visible= yes
set sidebar_delim = '|'
bind index \Cp sidebar-prev
bind index \Cn sidebar-next
bind index \Co sidebar-open
bind pager \Cp sidebar-prev
bind pager \Cn sidebar-next
bind pager \Co sidebar-open
folder-hook gmail/* source ${MUTTDIR}/accounts/gmail
folder-hook two/* source ${MUTTDIR}/accounts/two
But that didn't help... Did anyone came across similar behaviour and -
what's more important - solution to it?
1. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11250432/index.html
2. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7168
3. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37609
Regards,
weertex
Re: Sidebar patch bolds text inside message body
On Sunday 10/16/11 02:29:25 CST, Onoie Andrei wrote: > The issue is that everything that I highlight in the body or the header > of the message becomes bold or sometimes reversed. > Say I have > > color header color74 color233 "^From" > > 'From' in the header of the mail becomes in bold.This didn't happen when > I didn't have the sidebar patch applied. > I have no idea why this is happening. > If anybody has a fix for this, then please reply to the mail. > > Thanks in advance. I am using mutt with sidebar which is installed by gentoo portage. there is no such problem as you said. so I suggest you to try the sidebar patch from gentoo portage. you can download the patches here, http://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/mirrors/gentoo/distfiles/mutt-1.5.21-gentoo-patches-r7.tar.bz2 there patches seems to be relate to sidebar. gentoo portage installed some other patches as well, so it is not sure there would be no problem if just installed the only three patches for sidebar. my 'mutt -v' is, Mutt 1.5.21 (2010-09-15, Gentoo 1.5.21-r7) Copyright (C) 1996-2009 Michael R. Elkins and others. Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'. Mutt is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `mutt -vv' for details. System: Linux 3.0.6-gentoo (i686) ncurses: ncurses 5.9.20110404 (compiled with 5.9) hcache backend: GDBM version 1.9.1. 13/08/2011 (built Sep 22 2011 19:05:02) Compile options: -DOMAIN -DEBUG +HOMESPOOL -USE_SETGID +USE_DOTLOCK +DL_STANDALONE -USE_FCNTL +USE_FLOCK +USE_POP -USE_NNTP +USE_IMAP -USE_SMTP -USE_SSL_OPENSSL +USE_SSL_GNUTLS +USE_SASL -USE_GSS +HAVE_GETADDRINFO -HAVE_REGCOMP +USE_GNU_REGEX +COMPRESSED +HAVE_COLOR +HAVE_START_COLOR +HAVE_TYPEAHEAD +HAVE_BKGDSET +HAVE_CURS_SET +HAVE_META +HAVE_RESIZETERM +CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_PGP -CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_SMIME -CRYPT_BACKEND_GPGME -EXACT_ADDRESS -SUN_ATTACHMENT +ENABLE_NLS -LOCALES_HACK +HAVE_WC_FUNCS +HAVE_LANGINFO_CODESET +HAVE_LANGINFO_YESEXPR +HAVE_ICONV -ICONV_NONTRANS -HAVE_LIBIDN +HAVE_GETSID +USE_HCACHE ISPELL="/usr/bin/ispell" SENDMAIL="/usr/sbin/sendmail" MAILPATH="Maildir" PKGDATADIR="/usr/share/mutt" SYSCONFDIR="/etc/mutt" EXECSHELL="/bin/sh" MIXMASTER="mixmaster" To contact the developers, please mail to . To report a bug, please visit http://bugs.mutt.org/. fg.sidebar-dotpathsep ar.sidebar-utf8 sidebar patch-1.5.11.vk.pgp_verbose_mime cd.trash_folder.3.4 dgc.subjrx fg.change_folder_next fg.smarttime vvv.initials vvv.quote vvv.nntp patch-1.5.20hg.pdmef.progress.vl.2 rr.compressed patch-1.5.4.lpr.collapse_flagged Lukas P. Ruf -- oooO: (..): :\.(:::Oooo:: ::\_)::(..):: :::)./::: ::(_/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Sidebar patch bolds text inside message body
Hello. I am using mutt with the sidebar patch (mutt-sidebar from AUR) from lunar-linux.org on Arch linux. My mutt -v is: (start)- Mutt 1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Copyright (C) 1996-2009 Michael R. Elkins and others. Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'. Mutt is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `mutt -vv' for details. System: Linux 3.0-ARCH (i686) slang: 20204 hcache backend: GDBM version 1.8.3. 10/15/2002 (built Jan 7 2011 13:57:19) Compile options: -DOMAIN -DEBUG -HOMESPOOL -USE_SETGID +USE_DOTLOCK -DL_STANDALONE +USE_FCNTL -USE_FLOCK +USE_POP +USE_IMAP +USE_SMTP +USE_SSL_OPENSSL -USE_SSL_GNUTLS +USE_SASL -USE_GSS +HAVE_GETADDRINFO -HAVE_REGCOMP +USE_GNU_REGEX +HAVE_COLOR -HAVE_START_COLOR -HAVE_TYPEAHEAD -HAVE_BKGDSET -HAVE_CURS_SET -HAVE_META -HAVE_RESIZETERM +CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_PGP +CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_SMIME +CRYPT_BACKEND_GPGME -EXACT_ADDRESS -SUN_ATTACHMENT +ENABLE_NLS -LOCALES_HACK +HAVE_WC_FUNCS +HAVE_LANGINFO_CODESET +HAVE_LANGINFO_YESEXPR +HAVE_ICONV -ICONV_NONTRANS -HAVE_LIBIDN +HAVE_GETSID +USE_HCACHE -ISPELL SENDMAIL="/usr/sbin/sendmail" MAILPATH="/var/mail" PKGDATADIR="/usr/share/mutt" SYSCONFDIR="/etc" EXECSHELL="/bin/sh" -MIXMASTER To contact the developers, please mail to . To report a bug, please visit http://bugs.mutt.org/. patch-1.5.16hg.cd.trash_folder.vl.1 patch-1.5.20.sidebar.20090619.txt (end)- The issue is that everything that I highlight in the body or the header of the message becomes bold or sometimes reversed. Say I have color header color74 color233 "^From" 'From' in the header of the mail becomes in bold.This didn't happen when I didn't have the sidebar patch applied. I have no idea why this is happening. If anybody has a fix for this, then please reply to the mail. Thanks in advance.
Re: Sidebar patch for mutt-1.5.21
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:42:58 -0900, Tim Johnson wrote: > I have been using 1.5.19 with the sidebar path for some time now. > I just downloaded version 1.5.21, which I presume to be the current > stable version. > > Where are instructions for the sidebar patch for this version? > > Note: I did a quick google and I seem to be seeing some conflicting > information and am not entirely sure the current sidebar code is > compatible with the current (1.5.21) version of mutt. I am running 1.5.21 from an openSUSE rpm. I have the src rpm and extracted the sidebar related patches that you can try. here: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/~pat/mutt-1.5.21.sidebar-fix.dif http://wahoo.no-ip.org/~pat/patch-1.5.21.sidebar-aa6aa.txt.bz2 hth, -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535@ http://counter.li.org
Re: Sidebar patch for mutt-1.5.21
* Brandon Sandrowicz [110121 21:32]: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 04:42:58PM -0900, Tim Johnson wrote: > > Where are instructions for the sidebar patch for this version? > > > > Comments welcome > > Not really sure. I've tried to fix various things that are wrong with > the sidebar patch in the past, but the emails were never returned by the > maintainer. > > (To see things wrong with the sidebar patch, try various combinations of > of the settings status_on_top and help while the sidebar is enabled.) Yeah, lots of quirks with the sidebar, but I still like it. I can live without it tho'. There must be some reason that the mutt developer didn't chose to implement it. cheers -- Tim tim at johnsons-web.com or akwebsoft.com http://www.akwebsoft.com
Re: Sidebar patch for mutt-1.5.21
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 04:42:58PM -0900, Tim Johnson wrote: > I have been using 1.5.19 with the sidebar path for some time now. > I just downloaded version 1.5.21, which I presume to be the current > stable version. > > Where are instructions for the sidebar patch for this version? > > Note: I did a quick google and I seem to be seeing some conflicting > information and am not entirely sure the current sidebar code is > compatible with the current (1.5.21) version of mutt. > > Comments welcome > TIA > -- > Tim > tim at johnsons-web.com or akwebsoft.com > http://www.akwebsoft.com Not really sure. I've tried to fix various things that are wrong with the sidebar patch in the past, but the emails were never returned by the maintainer. (To see things wrong with the sidebar patch, try various combinations of of the settings status_on_top and help while the sidebar is enabled.) -- Brandon
Sidebar patch for mutt-1.5.21
I have been using 1.5.19 with the sidebar path for some time now. I just downloaded version 1.5.21, which I presume to be the current stable version. Where are instructions for the sidebar patch for this version? Note: I did a quick google and I seem to be seeing some conflicting information and am not entirely sure the current sidebar code is compatible with the current (1.5.21) version of mutt. Comments welcome TIA -- Tim tim at johnsons-web.com or akwebsoft.com http://www.akwebsoft.com
Maildir vs sidebar patch
I canged a mbox to Maildir lately and have a problem. Sidebar patch don't show list of mailboxes. It's empty. When I type 'c' and set mailbox manually, it works, but sidebar don't see my boxes. My mutt version is 1.5.20, i've installed it from FreeBSD ports with options: make WITH_MUTT_MAILDIR_MTIME_PATCH=yes WITH_MUTT_NNTP=yes WITH_MUTT_IMAP_HEADER_CACHE=yes WITH_MUTT_MAILDIR_HEADER_CACHE=yes WITH_MUTT_EDIT_THREADS=yes WITH_MUTT_SIDEBAR_PATCH=yes install clean What can I do to solve the problem? A part of my ~/.muttrc, connected to maildir: set mbox_type="Maildir" set spoolfile=~/Maildir/default set mbox=~/Maildir/default set postponed=~/Maildir/postponed set record=~/Maildir/sent --
Re: sidebar patch for 1.5.19
* Cristóbal Palmer [090206 16:51 -0500] > On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 10:12:39AM +0300, Andrey Zhidenkov wrote: > > Is there a sidebar patch for 1.5.19 version? Where can I get it? > > I vaguely remember the debian package maintainer saying that he was > working on mutt-patched to get it working for .19, but that there was > a lot of work to be done before that would work. Can't seem to find > that email, though. You can find an inoffical package (i386|amd64|ppc) including sidebar, indexcolor, tokyocabinett and sources here: deb http://www.lxtec.de/debarchiv unstable main deb-src http://www.lxtec.de/debarchiv unstable main Elimar -- The path to source is always uphill! -unknown- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: sidebar patch for 1.5.19
Re: Cristóbal Palmer 2009-02-06 <20090206215134.gb23...@garp.metalab.unc.edu> > > Is there a sidebar patch for 1.5.19 version? Where can I get it? > > I vaguely remember the debian package maintainer saying that he was > working on mutt-patched to get it working for .19, but that there was > a lot of work to be done before that would work. Can't seem to find > that email, though. > > If you really like your sidebar, I suggest you stick with .18 for now > or help the debian folks work on mutt-patched. Antonio is doing a great job with doing BTS housekeeping, and forwarding the "real" bugs to mutt's trac. Wrt to mutt-patched, it's definitely not very high on my priority list. I haven't seen a new patch from Terry yet: http://www.lunar-linux.org/index.php?page=mutt-sidebar Christoph -- c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: sidebar patch for 1.5.19
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 10:12:39AM +0300, Andrey Zhidenkov wrote: > Is there a sidebar patch for 1.5.19 version? Where can I get it? I vaguely remember the debian package maintainer saying that he was working on mutt-patched to get it working for .19, but that there was a lot of work to be done before that would work. Can't seem to find that email, though. If you really like your sidebar, I suggest you stick with .18 for now or help the debian folks work on mutt-patched. http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mutt.html Cheers, -- Cristóbal Palmer ibiblio.org systems administrator cdla.unc.edu research assistant
sidebar patch for 1.5.19
Is there a sidebar patch for 1.5.19 version? Where can I get it? Thank you.
Re: sidebar patch - performance
>> I use the sidebar patch myself and the only performance problem I see >> with my mutt is that loading mailboxes with quite a few messages takes >> some time. I don't know, however, if this is related to the side bar >> patch. Same here.
Re: sidebar patch - performance
On Sun 6.Apr'08 at 11:04:20 +0100, Raffi Khatchadourian wrote: On Sun 6.Apr'08 at 0:08:36 +0200, Eric Smith wrote: My pleasure in having the sidebar patch transform the mutt user experience has just been destroyed by observing the poor performance of for example scrolling up and down the index. There seems to be some buffer overload with delayed response compared to an unpatched mutt which is much more responsive. Am I alone in experiencing this? It also seems strange to me that the sidebar feature is not seen as a high priority by the general mutt community. I use the sidebar patch myself and the only performance problem I see with my mutt is that loading mailboxes with quite a few messages takes some time. I don't know, however, if this is related to the side bar patch. By the way, I think the side bar is an important feature and should be seen as high priority as well.
Re: sidebar patch - performance
On Sun 6.Apr'08 at 0:08:36 +0200, Eric Smith wrote: My pleasure in having the sidebar patch transform the mutt user experience has just been destroyed by observing the poor performance of for example scrolling up and down the index. There seems to be some buffer overload with delayed response compared to an unpatched mutt which is much more responsive. Am I alone in experiencing this? It also seems strange to me that the sidebar feature is not seen as a high priority by the general mutt community. I use the sidebar patch myself and the only performance problem I see with my mutt is that loading mailboxes with quite a few messages takes some time. I don't know, however, if this is related to the side bar patch.
sidebar patch - performance
My pleasure in having the sidebar patch transform the mutt user experience has just been destroyed by observing the poor performance of for example scrolling up and down the index. There seems to be some buffer overload with delayed response compared to an unpatched mutt which is much more responsive. Am I alone in experiencing this? It also seems strange to me that the sidebar feature is not seen as a high priority by the general mutt community. -- - Eric Smith
Re: Mutt 1.5.17 and sidebar patch
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 the mental interface of Stephan Seitz told: [...] > Thanks, changing n to F index_author works now with the mentioned problems > of collapsing a mailbox. This is bad. Since I don???t want all threads in > my mailboxes uncollapsed if no new mail is available in them, I can???t use > index_author or index_subject. Have a look at the header of debian/patches/not-applied/indexcolor and you can discuss this with the author. > Shade and sweet water! Ohhh no, heater on and a pint of beer now ;) Elimar -- "Talking much about oneself can also be a means to conceal oneself." -Friedrich Nietzsche
Re: Mutt 1.5.17 and sidebar patch
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 06:35:07PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 the mental interface of Stephan Seitz told: The index colour patch works as expected, if I don???t have the line(s) - folder-hook . 'push ;push V' index_subject doesn't color collapsed threads. This seems to be a bug :( Well, the subject lines to be coloured weren’t part of a thread, so they were not collapsed, but it seems that using V will break not only index_subject but index_author as well as further testings showed. The coloured lines begin to slip. Say, if there was something to colour in line 4 (without collapsed threads) and I collapse all threads in the mailbox, the colour will stay in line 4, even if the message now in this line doesn’t match the expression anymore. My quick solution (moving the folder-hook after the colour definitions) was wrong. I does not work. index_author colors %F Thanks, changing n to F index_author works now with the mentioned problems of collapsing a mailbox. This is bad. Since I don’t want all threads in my mailboxes uncollapsed if no new mail is available in them, I can’t use index_author or index_subject. But thanks for your help and patience. Shade and sweet water! Stephan -- | Stephan SeitzE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | PGP Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/pgp.html | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Mutt 1.5.17 and sidebar patch
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 the mental interface of
Stephan Seitz told:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 05:27:46PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>> Do you have your colorsettings in a separated file which isn't
>> sourced by the main muttrc?
>
> Now we are getting closer. Yes, I do, and this file is the last sourced
> colour file.
>
> However, checking my muttrc settings and testing line for line I got the
> following results:
> The index colour patch works as expected, if I don???t have the line(s)
> - folder-hook . 'push ;push V'
index_subject doesn't color collapsed threads. This seems to be a
bug :(
> This breaks index_subject, strange subject lines are coloured.
> - set index_format="%4C [%3M] %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15n %s"
> or
> set index_format="%4C [%3M] (%4c) %2Z %{%b %d} %17.17n %-20.20t %s"
> This breaks index_author, nothing is coloured anymore.
index_author colors %F
See
file://localhost/usr/share/doc/mutt/html/manual.html#index-format
> Putting the the folder-hook after the colour definition will result in a
> working index_subject again, but index_format breaks index_author not
> matter if the line is before or after the colour definition.
>
> Can you reproduce this with your version?
Yes I can.
Elimar
--
Excellent day for drinking heavily.
Spike the office water cooler;-)
Re: Mutt 1.5.17 and sidebar patch
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 05:27:46PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
Do you have your colorsettings in a separated file which isn't
sourced by the main muttrc?
Now we are getting closer. Yes, I do, and this file is the last sourced
colour file.
However, checking my muttrc settings and testing line for line I got the
following results:
The index colour patch works as expected, if I don’t have the line(s)
- folder-hook . 'push ;push V'
This breaks index_subject, strange subject lines are coloured.
- set index_format="%4C [%3M] %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15n %s"
or
set index_format="%4C [%3M] (%4c) %2Z %{%b %d} %17.17n %-20.20t %s"
This breaks index_author, nothing is coloured anymore.
Putting the the folder-hook after the colour definition will result in
a working index_subject again, but index_format breaks index_author not
matter if the line is before or after the colour definition.
Can you reproduce this with your version?
Shade and sweet water!
Stephan
--
| Stephan SeitzE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| PGP Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/pgp.html |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Mutt 1.5.17 and sidebar patch
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 the mental interface of Stephan Seitz told: [...] > Besides, if the patch was not applied, mutt would print an error for > unknown variables. You're right :) > For testing purposes I downloaded your mutt version from > http://www.lxtec.de/debarchiv/ and tested it on my i386 box. It produces > the same results as my own compiled version. So there is no difference > between your version and my version on two plattforms. Your built and your provided binary works as it should on my System. Do you have your colorsettings in a separated file which isn't sourced by the main muttrc? > I compared the ldd output between the two versions, but besides the > different header cache libraries and my kerberos support, there are no > differences. > > I???m using Debian Testing. That doesn't matter. Elimar -- >what IMHO then? IMHO - Inhalation of a Multi-leafed Herbal Opiate ;) --posting from alex in debian-user--
Re: Mutt 1.5.17 and sidebar patch
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 10:16:03PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: Tried that: Patch not-applied/indexcolor does not apply (enforce with -f) Hm: Wende Patch not-applied/indexcolor an patching file color.c patching file curs_lib.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 659 (offset 11 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 675 (offset 11 lines). patching file hdrline.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 103 (offset 4 lines). Hunk #9 succeeded at 601 (offset 4 lines). Hunk #10 succeeded at 713 (offset 4 lines). Hunk #11 succeeded at 735 (offset 4 lines). Hunk #12 succeeded at 763 (offset 4 lines). patching file menu.c patching file mutt_curses.h Hunk #2 succeeded at 185 (offset 10 lines). patching file mutt.h Hunk #1 succeeded at 182 (offset 6 lines). patching file doc/manual.xml.head Hunk #1 succeeded at 2016 (offset 179 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 2080 (offset 179 lines). patching file PATCHES Besides, if the patch was not applied, mutt would print an error for unknown variables. For testing purposes I downloaded your mutt version from http://www.lxtec.de/debarchiv/ and tested it on my i386 box. It produces the same results as my own compiled version. So there is no difference between your version and my version on two plattforms. I compared the ldd output between the two versions, but besides the different header cache libraries and my kerberos support, there are no differences. I’m using Debian Testing. Shade and sweet water! Stephan -- | Stephan SeitzE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | PGP Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/pgp.html | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Mutt 1.5.17 and sidebar patch
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 the mental interface of Stephan Seitz told: > On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 09:05:13PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: >> How did you compile your mutt version? > > The debian way, I downloaded mutt-15.17 (debian/unstable) and from your > site. I copied the er-patches directory from your source to the debian > source, corrected the series file and did ???debian/rules build??? > ???debian/rules binary???. > > Additional to your patches I have the debian patches for chdir and w3mface > applied. Tried that: Patch not-applied/indexcolor does not apply (enforce with -f) Hmm. Elimar -- Learned men are the cisterns of knowledge, not the fountainheads ;-)
Re: Mutt 1.5.17 and sidebar patch
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 the mental interface of Stephan Seitz told: > On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 09:05:13PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: >> How did you compile your mutt version? > > The debian way, I downloaded mutt-15.17 (debian/unstable) and from your > site. I copied the er-patches directory from your source to the debian > source, corrected the series file and did ???debian/rules build??? > ???debian/rules binary???. > > Additional to your patches I have the debian patches for chdir and w3mface > applied. On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 the mental interface of Stephan Seitz told: > On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 09:37:18PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: >> It seems, that your indexcolor patch didn't applied corect. > > Well, I build mutt again and checked if there were some rejects. There are > none. The patch applied without failures, only some hunks are mentioned. > But this new mutt showed the same behaviour like the old one. > > So if there are no problems with the amd64 architecture, I don???t know any > other reason, what it could be. Please send me the mutt_1.5.17_i386.build file via PM. Elimar -- Never make anything simple and efficient when a way can be found to make it complex and wonderful ;-)
Re: Mutt 1.5.17 and sidebar patch
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 09:37:18PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: It seems, that your indexcolor patch didn't applied corect. Well, I build mutt again and checked if there were some rejects. There are none. The patch applied without failures, only some hunks are mentioned. But this new mutt showed the same behaviour like the old one. So if there are no problems with the amd64 architecture, I don’t know any other reason, what it could be. Shade and sweet water! Stephan -- | Stephan SeitzE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | PGP Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/pgp.html | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Mutt 1.5.17 and sidebar patch
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 the mental interface of Stephan Seitz told: > On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 09:18:12PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: >> Switch to the pager and type: >> >> / ~s ANT >> >> Which messages does mutt find? > > In my main folder it finds the message I wanted to colour and in the debian > folder (the folder with my two examples) it finds a message with IMPORTANT > in the subject, but not the two messages that were coloured. It seems, that your indexcolor patch didn't applied corect. Elimar -- We all know Linux is great... it does infinite loops in 5 seconds. -- Linus Torvalds
Re: Mutt 1.5.17 and sidebar patch
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 09:05:13PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: How did you compile your mutt version? The debian way, I downloaded mutt-15.17 (debian/unstable) and from your site. I copied the er-patches directory from your source to the debian source, corrected the series file and did „debian/rules build” „debian/rules binary”. Additional to your patches I have the debian patches for chdir and w3mface applied. Shade and sweet water! Stephan -- | Stephan SeitzE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | PGP Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/pgp.html | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Mutt 1.5.17 and sidebar patch
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 09:18:12PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: Switch to the pager and type: / ~s ANT Which messages does mutt find? In my main folder it finds the message I wanted to colour and in the debian folder (the folder with my two examples) it finds a message with IMPORTANT in the subject, but not the two messages that were coloured. Shade and sweet water! Huuu, now I need sun and some Tequilla sunrise! You can let your mind radiate. Shade and sweet water! Stephan -- | Stephan SeitzE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | PGP Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/pgp.html | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Mutt 1.5.17 and sidebar patch
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 the mental interface of Stephan Seitz told: > On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 08:03:17PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: >> color index_subject brightred black '~s ANT' >> Works for sure ;) > > Well, in some ways it works, but as expected. This rule colours the > following subjects: > > [OT] Scripting question: the length limit of a list? > and > [SECURITY] [DSA 1400-1] New perl packages fix arbitrary code execution > > Now the big question, why. Switch to the pager and type: / ~s ANT Which messages does mutt find? > Shade and sweet water! Huuu, now I need sun and some Tequilla sunrise! Elimar -- Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it!
Re: Mutt 1.5.17 and sidebar patch
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 08:03:17PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: color index_subject brightred black '~s ANT' Works for sure ;) Well, in some ways it works, but as expected. This rule colours the following subjects: [OT] Scripting question: the length limit of a list? and [SECURITY] [DSA 1400-1] New perl packages fix arbitrary code execution Now the big question, why. Shade and sweet water! Stephan -- | Stephan SeitzE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | PGP Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/pgp.html | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Mutt 1.5.17 and sidebar patch
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 the mental interface of Stephan Seitz told: > On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 08:23:02PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: >> Your mutt isn't patched with the indexcolor patch! You noticed that >> my examples are for use with indexcolor? > > mutt -v shows patch-1.5.13.greek0.indexcolor-3+cb. Every index_* functions > are working besides those needing regex expressions. How did you compile your mutt version? Elimar -- Numeric stability is probably not all that important when you're guessing;-)
Re: Mutt 1.5.17 and sidebar patch
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 08:23:02PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: Your mutt isn't patched with the indexcolor patch! You noticed that my examples are for use with indexcolor? mutt -v shows patch-1.5.13.greek0.indexcolor-3+cb. Every index_* functions are working besides those needing regex expressions. Shade and sweet water! Stephan -- | Stephan SeitzE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | PGP Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/pgp.html | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Mutt 1.5.17 and sidebar patch
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 the mental interface of Stephan Seitz told: > On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 08:03:17PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: >> color index_subject brightred black '~s ANT' >> Works for sure ;) > > Not here. > And I made sure, that this was the only color command I had in my muttrc. Your mutt isn't patched with the indexcolor patch! You noticed that my examples are for use with indexcolor? Elimar -- Planung: Ersatz des Zufalls durch den Irrtum. -unknown-
Re: Mutt 1.5.17 and sidebar patch
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 08:03:17PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: color index_subject brightred black '~s ANT' Works for sure ;) Not here. And I made sure, that this was the only color command I had in my muttrc. Shade and sweet water! Stephan -- | Stephan SeitzE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | PGP Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/pgp.html | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Mutt 1.5.17 and sidebar patch
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 the mental interface of Stephan Seitz told: [...] > color index_subject brightred black "~s ANT" > does not colour mails having ANT in there subjects. color index_subject brightred black '~s ANT' Works for sure ;) > >> BTW: Try >> $ HOWTO='pack c5,41*2,sqrt 7056,unpack(c,H)-2,oct 115' && perl -le "print >> $HOWTO" > > Well, first there has to be a FM with examples, second those examples must > work. ;-) > > Shade and sweet water! First close your curtains. Second: take a big sip of seet water. Third: You know Elimar -- >what IMHO then? IMHO - Inhalation of a Multi-leafed Herbal Opiate ;) --posting from alex in debian-user--
Re: Mutt 1.5.17 and sidebar patch
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 05:15:50PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: color index_author brightwhite default !~N color index_author brightred default ~N color index_author red brightyellow ~F color index_author cyan default '~r >5d' color index_author green default '~r >10d' color index_author brightyellow red ~D None of those above are working here. color index_subject brightwhite default !~N Your index_subject examples are working, but I want something like „if subject contains , colour it”. My test color index_subject brightred black "~s ANT" does not colour mails having ANT in there subjects. BTW: Try $ HOWTO='pack c5,41*2,sqrt 7056,unpack(c,H)-2,oct 115' && perl -le "print $HOWTO" Well, first there has to be a FM with examples, second those examples must work. ;-) Shade and sweet water! Stephan -- | Stephan SeitzE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | PGP Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/pgp.html | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Mutt 1.5.17 and sidebar patch
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 the mental interface of Stephan Seitz told: > Hi! > > I'm using mutt 1.5.17 together with the sidebar patch. Now I'm wondering > how to user index_author and index_subject. > The command "color index_subject red black ." will colour all subject lines, > but if I exchange "." with another expression, nothing happens. > And I don't get any results with index_author. > > Are there some people using these features? My setting for the sidebar colors: color sidebar_new brightyellow default color sidebar brightgreen red My settings to use the indexcolor patch: color index_author brightwhite default !~N color index_author brightred default ~N color index_author red brightyellow ~F color index_author cyan default '~r >5d' color index_author green default '~r >10d' color index_author brightyellow red ~D color index_subject brightwhite default !~N color index_subject brightred default ~N color index_subject red brightyellow ~F color index_subject cyan default '~r >5d' color index_subject green default '~r >10d' color index_subject brightyellow red ~D color index_collapsed brightyellow default color index_number blue default color index_flags brightyellow default color index_date magenta default color index_size brightyellow default color index_label brightyellow default BTW: Try $ HOWTO='pack c5,41*2,sqrt 7056,unpack(c,H)-2,oct 115' && perl -le "print $HOWTO" Elimar -- >what IMHO then? IMHO - Inhalation of a Multi-leafed Herbal Opiate ;) --posting from alex in debian-user--
Mutt 1.5.17 and sidebar patch
Hi! I'm using mutt 1.5.17 together with the sidebar patch. Now I'm wondering how to user index_author and index_subject. The command "color index_subject red black ." will colour all subject lines, but if I exchange "." with another expression, nothing happens. And I don't get any results with index_author. Are there some people using these features? By the way, the sidebar patch breaks the maildir_mtime patch. Has by chance anyone ported the maildir_mtime patch so it can be applied to the mutt sources with sidebar patch? Shade and sweet water! Stephan -- | Stephan SeitzE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | PGP Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/pgp.html | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Return does not work with sidebar patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:33:34PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote: > > Is there a tool which tells me the characters of keystrokes? > > xev does not work for key combinations. > > Yes, there is such a tool built into mutt. From the index, type > >:exec what-key > > and hit enter. I've never heard of that one - are there other built-in programs in mutt which can be invoked using :exec? I've found nothing on the web / man page. > I just tried this and it seems a little broken. The following keys, > > >Ctrl-J >Ctrl-M > > are all displayed as > >Char = , Octal = 12, Decimal = 10 Same thing here. Ctrl-M should be something with Decimal value 14. Does anybody know why Ctrl-M (Carriage Return) is the same as Ctrl-J (Line Feed / Newline)? Perhaps it has something to do with portability between Linux, Windows and Mac computers? > Getting back to the subject of overlapping keys, applications that > are designed to accept input from a terminal, as mutt is, accept > only sequences of 7-bit or 8-bit characters because that's all the > original terminals supported. I've understood this and the in-depth explanation in your other mail, at least I believe so. But mutt is able to use the Unicode character set for displaying. So, input has to be sequences of 7-bit / 8-bit characters, output can be the whole unicode character set? Regards, Andreas - -- ^^^| Andreas Leppert d(O_o)b | GPG/PGP-Key-ID: 0x4845F397 >-|-< | GPG/PGP-Finger: E3C0 8438 6F0C 2D02 5E0C 0306 E847 964A 4845 F397 / \| Jabber-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ#: smas][or 104361704 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHC2H06EeWSkhF85cRAvpOAJ0QhlS/O9dPW0rKoY5ExPf7fHa7xwCfWm3D wsAeb/PdxbfiF0KzMQQi/iE= =f1Uf -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Return does not work with sidebar patch
On 2007-10-09, Andreas Leppert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 02:36:30PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote: > > Since you didn't elaborate on what you mean by "return" except that > > it is not the same as "enter", I assume that you mean an ASCII > > carriage return, 0x0D. That is the same character as Ctrl-J. > > Well, I did not know that Ctrl-J is the same character as "Return" / > 0x0D, now it makes sense why mutt is behaving as I've described it. > > Are there other mappings which overrides standards keys? I mean Ctrl-J > is overlapping with , are there others? I'm sorry--I got distracted and didn't really answer this question except by reference to "man ascii". Here are the Ctrl equivalents of some common keys. HexControl Value Character Abbrev. Name - - 07 Ctrl-G BEL Bell 08 Ctrl-H BSBackspace 09 Ctrl-I HTHorizontal Tab 0A Ctrl-J LF or NL Line Feed or Newline 0C Ctrl-L FFForm Feed or Newpage 0D Ctrl-M CRCarriage Return 1B Ctrl-[ ESC Escape As I wrote previously, the control codes are not really overriding the other keys--they are synonyms for the same character. GUI applications often have the ability to distinguish, say the Tab key from the key combination Ctrl-I, but terminal applications don't have this ability. Terminal application see characters rather than keys. I hope that was a little clearer. Regards, Gary
Re: Return does not work with sidebar patch
On 2007-10-09, Andreas Leppert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 02:36:30PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote: > > Since you didn't elaborate on what you mean by "return" except that > > it is not the same as "enter", I assume that you mean an ASCII > > carriage return, 0x0D. That is the same character as Ctrl-J. > > Well, I did not know that Ctrl-J is the same character as "Return" / > 0x0D, now it makes sense why mutt is behaving as I've described it. > > Are there other mappings which overrides standards keys? I mean Ctrl-J > is overlapping with , are there others? >From the standpoint of an application running in a terminal, Ctrl-J is identical to Carriage Return--those are two names for the same character. You can get a table of the names of all the ASCII character codes on a Unix system by executing man ascii You might find more meaningful names, spelled out, by Googling for ASCII. > Is there a tool which tells me the characters of keystrokes? > xev does not work for key combinations. Yes, there is such a tool built into mutt. From the index, type :exec what-key and hit enter. I just tried this and it seems a little broken. The following keys, Ctrl-J Ctrl-M are all displayed as Char = , Octal = 12, Decimal = 10 Getting back to the subject of overlapping keys, applications that are designed to accept input from a terminal, as mutt is, accept only sequences of 7-bit or 8-bit characters because that's all the original terminals supported. Applications that are designed to run in a GUI often have access to the raw key codes generated by the keyboard, so they can distinguish the left Ctrl key from the right Ctrl key and can detect combinations such as Shift-Tab which don't exist in ASCII. This causes a lot of confusion among newcomers who don't understand why they can use all sorts of key combinations in a GUI program but can't use those combinations in program running in a terminal. > I've changed my sidebar settings to the standard values, now everything > is good. Thanks Gary! You're welcome. Regards, Gary
Re: Return does not work with sidebar patch
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 02:36:30PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote: > Since you didn't elaborate on what you mean by "return" except that > it is not the same as "enter", I assume that you mean an ASCII > carriage return, 0x0D. That is the same character as Ctrl-J. Well, I did not know that Ctrl-J is the same character as "Return" / 0x0D, now it makes sense why mutt is behaving as I've described it. Are there other mappings which overrides standards keys? I mean Ctrl-J is overlapping with , are there others? Is there a tool which tells me the characters of keystrokes? xev does not work for key combinations. I've changed my sidebar settings to the standard values, now everything is good. Thanks Gary! Greetings, Andreas -- ^^^| Andreas Leppert d(O_o)b | GPG/PGP-Key-ID: 0x4845F397 >-|-< | GPG/PGP-Finger: E3C0 8438 6F0C 2D02 5E0C 0306 E847 964A 4845 F397 / \| Jabber-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ#: smas][or 104361704 pgpHIpOVMJ31X.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Return does not work with sidebar patch
Hello, i use the sidebar patch in gentoo without a problem (1.5.16, Useflags: berkdb crypt -debug gdbm gnutls -gpgme -idn -imap -mbox nls -nntp -pop -qdbm -sasl sidebar smime -smtp ssl -vanilla). I changed the bindings for better use to this: bind index \ca sidebar-prev bind index \cy sidebar-next bind index \cx sidebar-open bind pager \ca sidebar-prev bind pager \cy sidebar-next bind pager \cx sidebar-open Only real difference is that you use \C and i \c, but i don't know if that's of any importance. I would try the gentoo forum, it's excellent.
Re: Return does not work with sidebar patch
On 2007-10-08, Andreas Leppert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello mutt users, > > my first post to the list. > > Since I've read about the sidebar USE-flag (Gentoo) in this mailing > list, I've given it a try and it works almost perfect, only one thing is > annoying me: > > I can no longer use return to open mails or scroll down mails, instead, > the next entry in the sidebar is marked. Please notice that I mean > return, and not the enter key. With enter, it always works. > > This only happens when the sidebar-next bindings are active! Here is my > configuration with regard to the sidebar patch: > > --- snip --- > > set sidebar_visible="yes" > set sidebar_width=40 > set sidebar_delim=" | " > > color sidebar_new yellow default > > bind index \Ck sidebar-prev > bind index \Cj sidebar-next > bind index \Co sidebar-open > bind pager \Ck sidebar-prev > bind pager \Cj sidebar-next > bind pager \Co sidebar-open > > macro index B ':toggle sidebar_visible' > macro pager B ':toggle sidebar_visible' > > --- snap --- > > Again: if I comment out the two sidebar-next bindings, I can use return > to open mails. Since you didn't elaborate on what you mean by "return" except that it is not the same as "enter", I assume that you mean an ASCII carriage return, 0x0D. That is the same character as Ctrl-J. These two commands bind Ctrl-J to sidebar-next, bind index \Cj sidebar-next bind pager \Cj sidebar-next Mutt is behaving exactly as you configured it to behave. If you don't want that behavior, comment-out or delete those two lines. Regards, Gary
Return does not work with sidebar patch
Hello mutt users, my first post to the list. Since I've read about the sidebar USE-flag (Gentoo) in this mailing list, I've given it a try and it works almost perfect, only one thing is annoying me: I can no longer use return to open mails or scroll down mails, instead, the next entry in the sidebar is marked. Please notice that I mean return, and not the enter key. With enter, it always works. This only happens when the sidebar-next bindings are active! Here is my configuration with regard to the sidebar patch: --- snip --- set sidebar_visible="yes" set sidebar_width=40 set sidebar_delim=" | " color sidebar_new yellow default bind index \Ck sidebar-prev bind index \Cj sidebar-next bind index \Co sidebar-open bind pager \Ck sidebar-prev bind pager \Cj sidebar-next bind pager \Co sidebar-open macro index B ':toggle sidebar_visible' macro pager B ':toggle sidebar_visible' --- snap --- Again: if I comment out the two sidebar-next bindings, I can use return to open mails. Is this a bug, does anyone know a solution to it? Thanks in advance Andreas -- ^^^| Andreas Leppert d(O_o)b | GPG/PGP-Key-ID: 0x4845F397 >-|-< | GPG/PGP-Finger: E3C0 8438 6F0C 2D02 5E0C 0306 E847 964A 4845 F397 / \| Jabber-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ#: smas][or 104361704 pgpO2KlL8CIpW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: sidebar patch
On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 at 21:48, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Tuesday, September 25 at 04:54 PM, quoth Joseph: > >I've seen an interesting sidebar patch for mutt, though it was just that > >"a patch" is not new and was never implemented. > >I am just curious as to the reason why it was never implemented. > > Eh? It *was* implemented - that patch is the implementation. > > If you're asking why it was never added to the mainstream mutt, the > answer is a contentious one, but one which can be found by searching > the mutt mailing list archives. It was deemed "froofy" by one of the > main mutt developers > (http://marc.info/?l=mutt-dev&m=112118911225394&w=2), and heavily > broken by one of the others > (http://marc.info/?l=mutt-dev&m=112133798519807&w=2). I'm not actually against the idea any more -- just the implementation.
Re: sidebar patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, September 25 at 04:54 PM, quoth Joseph: >I've seen an interesting sidebar patch for mutt, though it was just that >"a patch" is not new and was never implemented. >I am just curious as to the reason why it was never implemented. Eh? It *was* implemented - that patch is the implementation. If you're asking why it was never added to the mainstream mutt, the answer is a contentious one, but one which can be found by searching the mutt mailing list archives. It was deemed "froofy" by one of the main mutt developers (http://marc.info/?l=mutt-dev&m=112118911225394&w=2), and heavily broken by one of the others (http://marc.info/?l=mutt-dev&m=112133798519807&w=2). ~Kyle - -- Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so. -- Douglas Adams -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Thank you for using encryption! iD8DBQFG+chuBkIOoMqOI14RAp0QAKCdOWQuXMmK47QIc2yG6DEt9QUHSQCeJ4RW RpS0Btax2sKD8rPfV2jkEjU= =96L6 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
sidebar patch
I've seen an interesting sidebar patch for mutt, though it was just that "a patch" is not new and was never implemented. I am just curious as to the reason why it was never implemented. -- #Joseph
Re: sidebar patch for mutt 1.5.16?
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:11:13AM -0400, Raffi Khatchadourian wrote: > Does anyone have a working sidebar patch for mutt 1.15.16? The latest > posted on the sidebar website is for 1.15.15. I used Terry's excellent patch for 1.5.15 to write a new one for 1.5.16. You can find it at http://vader.homeunix.org/~hoschi/src/mutt-devel/mutt-1.5.16.sidebar.20070702.patch It works fine for me with imap-ssl/hcache. -- Oliver PETER, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ# 113969174 "Worker bees can leave. Even drones can fly away. The Queen is their slave." pgp835gkDeqVL.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: sidebar patch for mutt 1.5.16?
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:11:13AM -0400, Raffi Khatchadourian wrote: > Does anyone have a working sidebar patch for mutt 1.15.16? The latest > posted on the sidebar website is for 1.15.15. I wrote an e-mail to the (Terry P. Chan / [EMAIL PROTECTED]) current maintainer of the patch for the previous mutt-devel version. Since this is a lot of work I'm sure that he will take any help that he can get. In the meantime I tried to patch the current version with the last patch - display of the folders and navigation works. It seems that it should not be a big problem to port this to the new mutt-devel version. -- Oliver PETER, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ# 113969174 "Worker bees can leave. Even drones can fly away. The Queen is their slave." pgpM44yQt7djn.pgp Description: PGP signature
sidebar patch for mutt 1.5.16?
Does anyone have a working sidebar patch for mutt 1.15.16? The latest posted on the sidebar website is for 1.15.15.
