Re: [[newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?]
On Thu, Feb 17, 2000 at 05:46:05PM -0500, Ron Burns wrote: Hi Alan... Is there actually an email client that will display html under Linux? Every Mime-compilant email client can launch extra apps to view html. There're many of them. I use mutt. Email client doesn't have to display html, just as they don't have to display pictures, plays music, or whatever you can send by email. There are better programs for this. The only requirement for email client is to be able to launch the good program for the good format. DindinX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [[newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?]
Just use good old Netscape works fine for all HTML email if that's all you want Jeanette - Original Message - From: "Mike Fieschko" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 11:15 PM Subject: Re: [[newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?] "Ron" == Ron Burns [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [snip] Ron Is there actually an email client that will display html Ron under Linux? XEmacs, of which I am using version 21.1.8, with VM 6.75. http://www.xemacs.org http://www.viconet.com/fieschko/xemacs.html It even does x-faces, which is that cool image of me all you folks can see in my From: header. Plus, inline image (gif, png, xpm, ...). Plus, randomly selecting a .sig quote. And, true threading, based on Message-Id: and References: headers. -- Mike Fieschko, West Orange, NJ, USA X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1.8 XEmacs and random-sig.el Kernel 2.2.15-5mdk http://www.viconet.com/fieschko/home.htm Feb 17 Feria "And the weakness of all Utopias is this, that they take the greatest difficulty of man and assume it to be overcome, and then give an elaborate account of the overcoming of the smaller ones. They first assume that no man will want more than his share, and then are very ingenious in explaining whether his share will be delivered by motor-car or balloon." [G.K. Chesterton, in Heretics]
Re: [[newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?]
:~I find it a necessity for my wife who has Multiple Sclerosis and needs to see the :larger / bolder type font. Sorry, but this makes absolutely no sense to me. You should set up her account to use LARGE fonts as default, then she will be able to read ANYONES e-mails, not just those written in very large fonts cu Denis - Mag^H^H^HDr. Denis Havlik http://www.ap.univie.ac.at/users/havlik Mandrakesoft||| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Austria(@ @) tel: (++431) 4277/51179 ---oOO--(_)--OOo- February 17-th 2000: The Linux Demo Y2k Day!!!
Re: [[newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?]
:~Hi Alan... :~ :~Is there actually an email client that will display html under Linux? Netscape for one. Although I am happy with pine 2. D. - Mag^H^H^HDr. Denis Havlik http://www.ap.univie.ac.at/users/havlik Mandrakesoft||| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Austria(@ @) tel: (++431) 4277/51179 ---oOO--(_)--OOo- February 17-th 2000: The Linux Demo Y2k Day!!!
Re: [[newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?]
:~ Is there actually an email client that will display html under Linux? Star office, 2
Re: [[newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kmail not doing HTML can only be a good thing IMHO! Amen to that! I am not much of an advocate for banning stuff but I can't figure out why people want email in HTML. Cheers John Montgomery
Re: [[newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?]
Is anyone using Spruce? I just installed it, and it looks good. I haven't actually used it, though. -- Lane Lane Lester / Madison County, Georgia USA Getting where I want to be with Corel Linux
Re: [[newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?]
Because HTML was never designed to be used in email. It bloats the size of the email message and takes up bandwidth for non-essential data. I guess it comes from using the internet and Fidonet many moons ago, when 2400 baud modems were speed-demons and 300/300 or even 1200/75 was more like the norm. Anything you could do to squeeze the last few cps out of a modem and keep the connection costs to a minimum was "a good thing". Over here in the UK, every connected phone call costs me cold hard cash. I don't have the luxury of a DSL modem or even a cable link. Local phone-calls cost me as soon as they connect. HTML is not neccessary for email. I can strip it out of the email after I've downloaded it, but by then it's too late - I've already paid to download it! When communicate with someone via email I want to be able to type in some text, and have it delivered. Ideally, the manner in which the message is rendered to the other party should be dependant upon /their/ browser. For example, I want the word 'their' in that previous sentence to be rendered to you in italics. I merely make a suggestion to the other parties email package that I'd like to draw emphasis to that particular word. Here, it displays as a slash, the word their and another slash. Anyone who was on Fidonet and has used packages like Spot, April, Foozle, etc. will realise what I mean! I don't want my email package to display "VIAGRA AVAILABLE HERE" in 48 point Verdana, blue background and red flashing letters because someone encases the thing in HTML. Ideally, I'd like it to be displayed in a montoype font, my usual 10 point size, no colours and no special effects! It's my choice! (Actually, I'd prefer it if the spam wasn't displayed at all!) HTML is absolutely great for web pages. Leave it there. I'm not even going to go down the embedded javascript (and the security implications that brings), gif and jpg attachments, attached midi files that start playing, etc. etc. etc. The only beneficial thing you can get from an email is the ability to click on a link, fire up the web page and browse straight to it. Of course, I'm not stupid and I can cut and paste the link just as easily. In fact, my usual email package allows me to hit PF7 and all links are stripped from the mesasge onscreen and placed into a seperate section of my bookmarks folder. Of course, I'm not mentioning that nearly every email package I've seen which send html email always (at least) doubles the size of the message by sending a plain text version and then sending the html'ised version immediately after it. WTF is the idea behind that! I can read at least one of them - don't send them both! Utterly brain-dead. BTW, I'm using Lotus Notes here at work. It truly is terrible for email. I can't control the quoting easily, I can't switch off attachments, etc. etc. However, I don't have a choice :( Steve Flynn IBM MVS Operations Analyst P.S. The record currently stands and 27k ot text for a mesage which basically had 4 words of content. "Our baby is born" sent to me (and 48 other colleagues at work). The idiot who'd sent it had been composing it in MS Outlook a few years ago and had messed about with placement, font sizes, colours, backgrounds and all sorts of other stuff. It was full of stuff like biggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallersmallerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbiggerbigger and so on, before the information that this unfortunate pondlife had forced a smaller version of himself upon the word, before doing the whole thing all over again, with the /bigger and /smaller tags. 27K for the html version 16 bytes for the plain text version 49 times. I'd be interested in why you think HTML is a necessity in your world. This isn't a flame by the way - I'm genuinely interested in why you feel you need it? We're also totally off-topic and this has precious little to do with Linux - best make it private unless people in here want to read it! :) Alan Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 17/02/2000 15:44:00 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Steve Flynn/UK/Contr/IBM) Subject: Re: [[newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?] John/SteveIn the world I compute/communicate in, HTML messaging is close to being a necessity. In fact I LIKE being able to send my 5 year old Granddaughter an email with a pink background and white scr
Re: [[newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?]
Alan Shoemaker wrote: family members in other parts of the country. Why do you guys WANT Kmail and other Linux mail clients to stay in the dark ages!!!??? Okay, for grand daughters I make an exception. :-) Perhaps when my 1 year old grand daughter gets to be 5 I will have changed my mind. don't think I am an old grump but I find it an annoyance on things like list responses. Anyway I enjoyed your response and it doesn't bother me enough to go to war over. Cheers John Montgomery
Re: [[newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Because HTML was never designed to be used in email. It bloats the size of the email message and takes up bandwidth for non-essential data. snip 27K for the html version 16 bytes for the plain text version 49 times. I'd be interested in why you think HTML is a necessity in your world. This isn't a flame by the way - I'm genuinely interested in why you feel you need it? We're also totally off-topic and this has precious little to do with Linux - best make it private unless people in here want to read it! :) Alan Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 17/02/2000 15:44:00 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] snip I find it a necessity for my wife who has Multiple Sclerosis and needs to see the larger / bolder type font. -- Joseph S. Gardner Senior Designer / Technical Support Kirby Co., Cleveland, OH [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux is like a wigwam... No windows, no gates. Apache inside
Re: [[newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?]
JohnI totally agree that it's unnecessary on list responses and, in fact rude once the person has been informed that it's a text-only list. But it wouldn't be annoying if everyone had the capability to read html. Not necessarily the ability to respond in it, just read it. I find the constant "lose the html" comments much more annoying than the html itself. But that's because I refuse to use a mail client that can't display html properly. No, no war, just agreeing to disagree on some things. :-) Alan monashee wrote: Alan Shoemaker wrote: family members in other parts of the country. Why do you guys WANT Kmail and other Linux mail clients to stay in the dark ages!!!??? Okay, for grand daughters I make an exception. :-) Perhaps when my 1 year old grand daughter gets to be 5 I will have changed my mind. don't think I am an old grump but I find it an annoyance on things like list responses. Anyway I enjoyed your response and it doesn't bother me enough to go to war over. Cheers John Montgomery
Re: [[newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?]
SteveIn answer to the below question. I think my original reply already answered that, but to elaborate. The people you call "Utterly brain-dead" and "this unfortunate pondlife" are my family and my friends who are simply using a turn-key system from Best Buy or Sam's Club to the best of their ability. The aren't old computer pros or long-time computer hobbyists. They're just people who want to use the computer, not study its inner workings. I'm not going to complain to them that I can't read their messages because I choose to use an inadequate mail client. That's rude. And this is the last I'll say on this subject, as it is off-topic. Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] I'd be interested in why you think HTML is a necessity in your world. This isn't a flame by the way - I'm genuinely interested in why you feel you need it? {snip]
Re: [[newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?]
On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, you wrote: JohnI totally agree that it's unnecessary on list responses and, in fact rude once the person has been informed that it's a text-only list. But it wouldn't be annoying if everyone had the capability to read html. Not necessarily the ability to respond in it, just read it. I find the constant "lose the html" comments much more annoying than the html itself. But that's because I refuse to use a mail client that can't display html properly. No, no war, just agreeing to disagree on some things. :-) Alan Hi Alan... Is there actually an email client that will display html under Linux? Thanks Ron
Re: [Re: [[newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?]]
Ron Burns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, you wrote: JohnI totally agree that it's unnecessary on list responses and, in fact rude once the person has been informed that it's a text-only list. But it wouldn't be annoying if everyone had the capability to read html. Not necessarily the ability to respond in it, just read it. I find the constant "lose the html" comments much more annoying than the html itself. But that's because I refuse to use a mail client that can't display html properly. No, no war, just agreeing to disagree on some things. :-) Alan Hi Alan... Is there actually an email client that will display html under Linux? Thanks Ron === Netscape messenger ## Michael Scottaline Linux 2.2.13 ## Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com.
Re: [Re: [[newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?]]
there are three I can think of off the top of my head: netscape messenger for linux, the emial client that comes with KDE, and there is a large download of staroffice that gives you a browser that has half decent fonts and a mail client that works with html. At 09:32 PM 2/17/00, you wrote: Hi Alan... Is there actually an email client that will display html under Linux? Thanks Ron === Netscape messenger ## Michael Scottaline Linux 2.2.13 ## Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com. JTyler fax:(508)519-8911 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wwp.icq.com/43034944 http://www.bigfoot.com/~jty
Re: [[newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?]
"Ron" == Ron Burns [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [snip] Ron Is there actually an email client that will display html Ron under Linux? XEmacs, of which I am using version 21.1.8, with VM 6.75. http://www.xemacs.org http://www.viconet.com/fieschko/xemacs.html It even does x-faces, which is that cool image of me all you folks can see in my From: header. Plus, inline image (gif, png, xpm, ...). Plus, randomly selecting a .sig quote. And, true threading, based on Message-Id: and References: headers. -- Mike Fieschko, West Orange, NJ, USA X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1.8 XEmacs and random-sig.el Kernel 2.2.15-5mdk http://www.viconet.com/fieschko/home.htm Feb 17 Feria "And the weakness of all Utopias is this, that they take the greatest difficulty of man and assume it to be overcome, and then give an elaborate account of the overcoming of the smaller ones. They first assume that no man will want more than his share, and then are very ingenious in explaining whether his share will be delivered by motor-car or balloon." [G.K. Chesterton, in Heretics]
Re: [[newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?]
I think it started on AOL, with thier html-based e mail system but I could be wrong On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, monashee mewed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kmail not doing HTML can only be a good thing IMHO! Amen to that! I am not much of an advocate for banning stuff but I can't figure out why people want email in HTML. Cheers John Montgomery -- Linux Cat
Re: [newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?
Afraid not - I've always used ELM on *nix boxen and I like it. I've not used /any/ mail packages under Mandrake, as I've currently only got a 56k WinModem in my box at home and until I get around to installing the development kernel which supports WinModems I'm only connecting to the net through my Windows machine. Steve Flynn IBM MVS Operations Analyst "Aaron Zuercher" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 15/02/2000 16:51:58 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Steve Flynn/UK/Contr/IBM) Subject: Re: [newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program? Not desperate.. just spoiled... :) Tried Post Office... has lots of promise, but lacks polish... know of any others? Aaron - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2000 9:10 AM Subject: Re: [newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program? Might be a daft question but what's wrong with ELM and PINE? You desperate to have a GUI interface? Steve Flynn IBM MVS Operations Analyst "Aaron Zuercher" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 15/02/2000 14:21:47 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Steve Flynn/UK/Contr/IBM) Subject: [newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program? Hello, I'm used to using MS Outlook Express and also Agent for email in Windows. Looking for a comparable program in Linux. Any Ideas? Thanks, Aaron
Re: [newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Sevatio Octavio wrote: Try StarOffice. But, I'm still looking for a linux email client that can handle multiple accounts for sending. Seve you should try Mutt (www.mutt.org) for handling multiple acc. i could send you my Mutt config if you want. -- Rib "I prefer the blunted cudgels of the followers of the Serpent God." -- Sean Doran the Younger
Re: [[newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?]
Kmail not doing HTML can only be a good thing IMHO! Steve Flynn IBM MVS Operations Analyst Michael Scottaline [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 15/02/2000 16:51:19 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Steve Flynn/UK/Contr/IBM) Subject: Re: [[newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?] "Aaron Zuercher" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm used to using MS Outlook Express and also Agent for email in Windows. Looking for a comparable program in Linux. Any Ideas? Thanks, Aaron = Give KMail a try. Doesn't do html though. Does allow multiple POP3 accounts like Outlook Express. ## Michael Scottaline Linux 2.2.13 ## Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com.
Re: [newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?
Eh! Nah! Lovely programs. Actually, I say this never having used ELM or PINE on my installation. I've used them both before under other flavours but never under Mandrake. Saying that, I used to use ELM as my email package on my Amiga 3000 alongside TIN for news. Being connected via a modem in the UK meant I was offline 99 percent of the time. I found them to both work beautifully. I fact, I used to use TIN to gate newsgroups from Usenet across in Fidonet. Worked beautifully. Not the most friendly of packages, I'll freely admit, nor are either of them 'pretty' (well, they weren't when I was using them about 3 years ago!) I do appreciate the nicities of a GIU interface though - using Win98 for the last two years as made me lazy. "What? You mean I can't just click on install? I have to compile it first and then install it by hand? modprobe? WTF is that? Why doesn't it just work" :) Steve Flynn IBM MVS Operations Analyst Dan Ros [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 15/02/2000 19:03:24 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Steve Flynn/UK/Contr/IBM) Subject: Re: [newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program? On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, you wrote: Might be a daft question but what's wrong with ELM and PINE? You desperate to have a GUI interface? Steve Flynn IBM MVS Operations Analyst They both are nasty when used offline.
Re: [newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?
:~ Might be a daft question but what's wrong with ELM and PINE? :~ :~ You desperate to have a GUI interface? :~ :~ Steve Flynn :~ IBM MVS Operations Analyst :~ :~ :~ :~They both are nasty when used offline. I have been using pine for years at home (i.e. ofline). What is the problem? Denis
Re: [newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?
Rib, Thanks! I'm checkin' it out. Seve -Original Message- From: Ribbo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 3:36 AM Subject: Re: [newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program? On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Sevatio Octavio wrote: Try StarOffice. But, I'm still looking for a linux email client that can handle multiple accounts for sending. Seve you should try Mutt (www.mutt.org) for handling multiple acc. i could send you my Mutt config if you want. -- Rib "I prefer the blunted cudgels of the followers of the Serpent God." -- Sean Doran the Younger
Re: [newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?
Not desperate.. just spoiled... :) Tried Post Office... has lots of promise, but lacks polish... know of any others? Aaron - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2000 9:10 AM Subject: Re: [newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program? Might be a daft question but what's wrong with ELM and PINE? You desperate to have a GUI interface? Steve Flynn IBM MVS Operations Analyst "Aaron Zuercher" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 15/02/2000 14:21:47 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Steve Flynn/UK/Contr/IBM) Subject: [newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program? Hello, I'm used to using MS Outlook Express and also Agent for email in Windows. Looking for a comparable program in Linux. Any Ideas? Thanks, Aaron
[newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?
Hello, I'm used to using MS Outlook Express and also Agent for email in Windows. Looking for a comparable program in Linux. Any Ideas? Thanks, Aaron
Re: [newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?
Might be a daft question but what's wrong with ELM and PINE? You desperate to have a GUI interface? Steve Flynn IBM MVS Operations Analyst "Aaron Zuercher" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 15/02/2000 14:21:47 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Steve Flynn/UK/Contr/IBM) Subject: [newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program? Hello, I'm used to using MS Outlook Express and also Agent for email in Windows. Looking for a comparable program in Linux. Any Ideas? Thanks, Aaron
Re: [newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?
Aaron Zuercher wrote: Hello, I'm used to using MS Outlook Express and also Agent for email in Windows. Looking for a comparable program in Linux. Any Ideas? Thanks, Aaron Netscape. Or Kmail. Or Spruce. Or Balsa. Or Pine. :-) Or Elm :-) Actually, Magellen is what I am waiting for. Unfortunatly, there is no code avaliable for download. Because it will support anything you could ever want from an e-mail client. Supposedly it will be out in time for KDE2. Currently Netscape mail is probably the most full featured, although it is not exactly what you would call bug free. If you want simple and easy, and you use KDE, try Kmail. Dan
Re: [[newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?]
"Aaron Zuercher" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm used to using MS Outlook Express and also Agent for email in Windows. Looking for a comparable program in Linux. Any Ideas? Thanks, Aaron = Give KMail a try. Doesn't do html though. Does allow multiple POP3 accounts like Outlook Express. ## Michael Scottaline Linux 2.2.13 ## Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com.
Re: [newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, you wrote: Might be a daft question but what's wrong with ELM and PINE? You desperate to have a GUI interface? Steve Flynn IBM MVS Operations Analyst They both are nasty when used offline.
Re: [newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?
Try StarOffice. But, I'm still looking for a linux email client that can handle multiple accounts for sending. Seve -Original Message- From: Aaron Zuercher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2000 12:57 PM Subject: Re: [newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program? Not desperate.. just spoiled... :) Tried Post Office... has lots of promise, but lacks polish... know of any others? Aaron - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2000 9:10 AM Subject: Re: [newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program? Might be a daft question but what's wrong with ELM and PINE? You desperate to have a GUI interface? Steve Flynn IBM MVS Operations Analyst "Aaron Zuercher" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 15/02/2000 14:21:47 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Steve Flynn/UK/Contr/IBM) Subject: [newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program? Hello, I'm used to using MS Outlook Express and also Agent for email in Windows. Looking for a comparable program in Linux. Any Ideas? Thanks, Aaron
Re: [newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?
Not a thing, Pine works ok on my box here, I have not tried Elm, maybe he needs to re-install his Pine or upgrade? On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] mewed: Might be a daft question but what's wrong with ELM and PINE? You desperate to have a GUI interface? Steve Flynn IBM MVS Operations Analyst "Aaron Zuercher" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 15/02/2000 14:21:47 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Steve Flynn/UK/Contr/IBM) Subject: [newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program? Hello, I'm used to using MS Outlook Express and also Agent for email in Windows. Looking for a comparable program in Linux. Any Ideas? Thanks, Aaron -- Linux Cat
Re: [newbie] Can anyone recommend a good email program?
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, you wrote: For the record Nothing is wrong with ELM and PINE. Just that I personally like features, and as far as I know, you can't use POP3 with either, unless you use fetchmail. And of course, neither support HTML e-mail, which I use everywhere but on the mailing list. Anyway, check out http://www.kalliance.org and look at Magellen, that is what we have to look foreward to. Dan Just browsing the mail I came across you follow up and followed your suggestion. All I can say is Magellen looks outstanding! Can't wait until it becomes available. John -- Linux, Win, DOS,- also known as the Good, the Bad and the Ugly! -- Contentment - is not the fulfillment of what you want, but the realization of how much you already have. --