Re: Cameras for a kid

[John]

On 3/8/2018 18:31, Bob W-PDML wrote:

On 8 Mar 2018, at 21:45, John Francis  wrote:



On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 03:47:57PM -0500, John wrote:

On 3/8/2018 15:27, Mark Roberts wrote:
John wrote:


I think "French literature" is a euphemism for "dirty French Post Cards".

For young American boys of a certain age, the lingerie section of the
Sears Catalog had to suffice.


I think "Sears lingerie" has to be the least sexy sounding concept
I've ever heard of.



Boys had no internet back then. Where else were they going to find
pictures of (almost) nekkid women?


Health & Efficiency.



They were completely nekkid! Let's all have a big hand for H, boys!




I don't think the drugstore down the street had that one on their magazine rack.

--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Eric Weir]

> On Mar 8, 2018, at 3:03 PM, Igor PDML-StR  wrote:
> 
> You described the boy, but it is important to know what (and why) he is 
> interested w.r.t. photography. Has he expressed his interest toward 
> photography? Or he just wants to have a camera to take cool selfies?
> Has he taken any photos (e.g. with a phone or tablet)? Have you seen those? 
> They might tell you some information…

Thanks, Igor. I regret to say that I didn’t inquire about that. I know he’s 
artistically inclined. Likes to hang out with my artist son-in-law. Was very 
curious about my camera when I spent some time with him last summer. Now that 
you ask, though, I’ll check in with my sister about it.

> Whether to get a system with interchangeable lenses (e.g. micro-2/3) or not, 
> - that would depend on the inclinations of the kiddo.
> If yes, meaning that the kid is expected to be very interested (and I'd talk 
> to him; at 12, he is grown up enough for that) and have sufficient
> guidance, - I'd consider starting with a reasonable "normal" prime lens, 
> adding a moderate zoom next, or the other way around.
> Otherwise, starting with a P with plenty of manual controls might be 
> sufficient to see if the interest lasts.

Those were the two options I recommended, along with an instant film camera in 
case they’re just exploring his interest.

> HTH

Definitely does, Igor.

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net

"The invincible shield of caring Is a weapon 
sent from the sky against being dead." 

- Tao Te Ching 67


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Eric Weir]

> On Mar 8, 2018, at 7:06 PM, Eric Weir  wrote:
> 
> Fuji X-2S

Shoulda been X-E2S.

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net

"What does it mean...that the world is so beautiful?" 

- Mary Oliver 










-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Eric Weir]

> On Mar 8, 2018, at 6:32 PM, Paul Stenquist  wrote:
> 
> The book appears to be quite good. But I think a digital camera is a must. 
> Kids live online, and he’ll undoubtedly want to post digital photos. Instant 
> cameras are old people toys. A good phone is better than many point and 
> shoots. My iPhone 7 allows extensive rendering options with the provided 
> apps. Add on apps expand that capability.

Thanks, Paul. I’m not certain of the state of my grandnephew’s interest in 
photography. The instant camera was in part a suggestion in case that’s unclear 
at this point. A way to find out. Spent some time with him last summer and he 
was very curious about my camera. Wanted to hold it. While he had it in hand I 
pointed out a few things. Doubt that they stuck. But I wouldn't be surprised to 
find out that he is definitely interested. In that case a digital camera would 
be the recommendation. 

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net

"What does it mean...that the world is so beautiful?" 

- Mary Oliver 










-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Eric Weir]

> On Mar 8, 2018, at 3:40 PM, Bruce Walker  wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Steve Cottrell  wrote:
>> 
>> I would go for a used Fuji X-20 - brilliant camera to learn with.
> 
> I have one in like new condition that I'd be more than happy to part with.

I’ll keep you in mind, Bruce. The X-20 was one of my recommendations. (The 
others were Fuji X-2S with Fuji XF 28 2.8 and a Fuji Instax Mini (there are 
several). If my sister decides on it I’ll tell her about your camera.

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net

"Imagining the other is a powerful antidote to fanaticism and hatred." 

- Amos Oz


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Eric Weir]

> On Mar 8, 2018, at 3:12 PM, John  wrote:
> 
>  think he'd probably get more out of the K1000, but I've been told
> more than once that I'm out of touch with what kids are into today.
> About all I do remember is how much it annoyed me when I was 12 to
> have some geezer telling me what was "good for me”.

A used camera shop here in Atlanta sells lots of film cameras to students. 

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net

“Man has been a murderer forever.”

- Peter Matthiessen.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Eric Weir]

> On Mar 8, 2018, at 2:29 PM, Steve Cottrell  wrote:
> 
> I would go for a used Fuji X-20 - brilliant camera to learn with.
> 
> 

That was one of my other thoughts, Cotty. I recommended it, too.

FYI, I still have the Fuji X-Q1 I bought for my trip to Italy, and that got me 
sold on Fuji equipment. Great camera. Just doesn’t have the analog controls I’d 
like. 

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net

"What is man without the beasts? If all the beasts were gone, 
men would die from a great loneliness of spirit." 

- Chief Seattle






-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Paul Stenquist]

I knew that. 

Paul

> On Mar 8, 2018, at 6:28 PM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:
> 
>> On 8 Mar 2018, at 19:34, Paul Stenquist  wrote:
>> 
>> When I was learning photography and darkroom techniques I was studying long 
>> division and reading the Hardy Boys. I was ten years old.
> 
> I read them when I was seven. 
> In Sanskrit. 
> During breaks in nuclear physics classes. 
> That I was giving.
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mar 8, 2018, at 2:26 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi  wrote:
>>> 
>>> I think BobW and I are soul mates. When I was getting deeper into 
>>> photography in High School, I was studying Latin, German, Old English, 
>>> Physics, Calculus, and reading S.I. Hayakawa's treatise on general 
>>> semantics, "Language in Thought and Action." I'd already signed off on the 
>>> French as savages. 
>>> 
>>> G
>>> —
>>> "We all get to be young and foolish in our lives. If we survive that, we 
>>> get to be old and foolish."
>>> 
 On Mar 8, 2018, at 10:50 AM, mike wilson  wrote:
 
 Your masochism knows no bounds.
 
> On 08 March 2018 at 16:36 Bob W-PDML  wrote:
> 
> 
> At the same time I was learning photography I was also starting to read 
> French literature...
> 
>> On 8 Mar 2018, at 15:57, Godfrey DiGiorgi  wrote:
>> 
>> You crack me up, Bob! That's a great line ...! :-)
>> ...
>> 
>>> On Mar 8, 2018, at 7:22 AM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Sounds like he needs an adult real-life lesson that will leave him 
>>> feeling inadequate, unloved and in despair at the pointlessness of 
>>> existence, so anything by Pentax will do.
>>> 
>>> ...
>>> 
 On 8 Mar 2018, at 14:31, Eric Weir  wrote:
 
 
 A sister has asked me for advice on a beginning camera for her 
 grandson. He’s 12, intelligent, creative, self-disciplined—all-in-all 
 pretty precocious about many things. I have my own thoughts, which may 
 not be best, but wondered what y’all might recommend.
 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Paul Stenquist]

The book appears to be quite good. But I think a digital camera is a must. Kids 
live online, and he’ll undoubtedly want to post digital photos. Instant cameras 
are old people toys. A good phone is better than many point and shoots. My 
iPhone 7 allows extensive rendering options with the provided apps. Add on apps 
expand that capability.

Paul

> On Mar 8, 2018, at 6:26 PM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:
> 
> You obviously know nothing of masochism and rope...
> 
>> On 8 Mar 2018, at 18:51, mike wilson  wrote:
>> 
>> Your masochism knows no bounds.
>> 
>>> On 08 March 2018 at 16:36 Bob W-PDML  wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> At the same time I was learning photography I was also starting to read 
>>> French literature...
>>> 
 On 8 Mar 2018, at 15:57, Godfrey DiGiorgi  wrote:
 
 You crack me up, Bob! That's a great line ...! :-)
 
 When I was that age, I'd already bought my own first camera (a Minolta 
 16-P which cost me the grand sum of $19 at Camera Craft in New Rochelle, 
 NY), having been given a couple of Kodak cameras before then. But I wanted 
 something more adjustable. My mother loaned me her Argus C3... with which 
 I learned a great deal about ruining film until I figured out how to work 
 aperture, shutter speed, and focus. AND remembered to wind on to the next 
 frame before re-cocking the shutter. 
 
 There really isn't a modern equivalent. I'd never start a youngster on a 
 35mm film camera nowadays, and any digital camera today has way more 
 capabilities and automation ... And the expectations of young people today 
 are quite different from my expectations of a camera in 1968. 
 
 However, as a teacher of photography, my goal in getting people who are 
 interested started out is to let them begin with focus and understanding 
 light, and understanding the difference between what your eyes see and 
 what the camera might record. Nothing on the market today would start a 
 young person off with a better basic understanding of those things than an 
 instant film camera with manual focus, and it would also serve to give 
 them the immediate return on their effort that is so important to the 
 learning experience. Something like the Lomo Instant Square I obtained 
 recently or a Polaroid SX-70 with the Polaroid Original film would do a 
 great job of teaching these things, and would also be special, different, 
 from the smartphone experience in ways that would be beneficial to 
 learning how to be patient, how to be economical of exposures, and how to 
 "look, think, and consider" before shooting. 
 
 G
 —
 No matter where you go, there you are.
 
 
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 7:22 AM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:
> 
> Sounds like he needs an adult real-life lesson that will leave him 
> feeling inadequate, unloved and in despair at the pointlessness of 
> existence, so anything by Pentax will do.
> 
> When I was about that age someone bought me an Instamatic, which quickly 
> frustrated me, but one of my schoolfriends had an Olympus Pen-F (the 
> half-frame one) and we could use the school darkroom, so I learned a bit 
> with that. There is a digital version now - something like that would 
> probably be good.
> 
> B
> 
>> On 8 Mar 2018, at 14:31, Eric Weir  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> A sister has asked me for advice on a beginning camera for her grandson. 
>> He’s 12, intelligent, creative, self-disciplined—all-in-all pretty 
>> precocious about many things. I have my own thoughts, which may not be 
>> best, but wondered what y’all might recommend.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Bob W-PDML]

On 8 Mar 2018, at 21:45, John Francis  wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 03:47:57PM -0500, John wrote:
>>> On 3/8/2018 15:27, Mark Roberts wrote:
>>> John wrote:
>>> 
 I think "French literature" is a euphemism for "dirty French Post Cards".
 
 For young American boys of a certain age, the lingerie section of the
 Sears Catalog had to suffice.
>>> 
>>> I think "Sears lingerie" has to be the least sexy sounding concept
>>> I've ever heard of.
>>> 
>> 
>> Boys had no internet back then. Where else were they going to find
>> pictures of (almost) nekkid women?
> 
> Health & Efficiency.
> 

They were completely nekkid! Let's all have a big hand for H, boys!


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Bob W-PDML]

On 8 Mar 2018, at 19:34, Paul Stenquist  wrote:
> 
> When I was learning photography and darkroom techniques I was studying long 
> division and reading the Hardy Boys. I was ten years old.

I read them when I was seven. 
In Sanskrit. 
During breaks in nuclear physics classes. 
That I was giving.

> 
> 
>> On Mar 8, 2018, at 2:26 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi  wrote:
>> 
>> I think BobW and I are soul mates. When I was getting deeper into 
>> photography in High School, I was studying Latin, German, Old English, 
>> Physics, Calculus, and reading S.I. Hayakawa's treatise on general 
>> semantics, "Language in Thought and Action." I'd already signed off on the 
>> French as savages. 
>> 
>> G
>> —
>> "We all get to be young and foolish in our lives. If we survive that, we get 
>> to be old and foolish."
>> 
>>> On Mar 8, 2018, at 10:50 AM, mike wilson  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Your masochism knows no bounds.
>>> 
 On 08 March 2018 at 16:36 Bob W-PDML  wrote:
 
 
 At the same time I was learning photography I was also starting to read 
 French literature...
 
> On 8 Mar 2018, at 15:57, Godfrey DiGiorgi  wrote:
> 
> You crack me up, Bob! That's a great line ...! :-)
> ...
> 
>> On Mar 8, 2018, at 7:22 AM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:
>> 
>> Sounds like he needs an adult real-life lesson that will leave him 
>> feeling inadequate, unloved and in despair at the pointlessness of 
>> existence, so anything by Pentax will do.
>> 
>> ...
>> 
>>> On 8 Mar 2018, at 14:31, Eric Weir  wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> A sister has asked me for advice on a beginning camera for her 
>>> grandson. He’s 12, intelligent, creative, self-disciplined—all-in-all 
>>> pretty precocious about many things. I have my own thoughts, which may 
>>> not be best, but wondered what y’all might recommend.
>>> 
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Bob W-PDML]

You obviously know nothing of masochism and rope...

> On 8 Mar 2018, at 18:51, mike wilson  wrote:
> 
> Your masochism knows no bounds.
> 
>> On 08 March 2018 at 16:36 Bob W-PDML  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> At the same time I was learning photography I was also starting to read 
>> French literature...
>> 
>>> On 8 Mar 2018, at 15:57, Godfrey DiGiorgi  wrote:
>>> 
>>> You crack me up, Bob! That's a great line ...! :-)
>>> 
>>> When I was that age, I'd already bought my own first camera (a Minolta 16-P 
>>> which cost me the grand sum of $19 at Camera Craft in New Rochelle, NY), 
>>> having been given a couple of Kodak cameras before then. But I wanted 
>>> something more adjustable. My mother loaned me her Argus C3... with which I 
>>> learned a great deal about ruining film until I figured out how to work 
>>> aperture, shutter speed, and focus. AND remembered to wind on to the next 
>>> frame before re-cocking the shutter. 
>>> 
>>> There really isn't a modern equivalent. I'd never start a youngster on a 
>>> 35mm film camera nowadays, and any digital camera today has way more 
>>> capabilities and automation ... And the expectations of young people today 
>>> are quite different from my expectations of a camera in 1968. 
>>> 
>>> However, as a teacher of photography, my goal in getting people who are 
>>> interested started out is to let them begin with focus and understanding 
>>> light, and understanding the difference between what your eyes see and what 
>>> the camera might record. Nothing on the market today would start a young 
>>> person off with a better basic understanding of those things than an 
>>> instant film camera with manual focus, and it would also serve to give them 
>>> the immediate return on their effort that is so important to the learning 
>>> experience. Something like the Lomo Instant Square I obtained recently or a 
>>> Polaroid SX-70 with the Polaroid Original film would do a great job of 
>>> teaching these things, and would also be special, different, from the 
>>> smartphone experience in ways that would be beneficial to learning how to 
>>> be patient, how to be economical of exposures, and how to "look, think, and 
>>> consider" before shooting. 
>>> 
>>> G
>>> —
>>> No matter where you go, there you are.
>>> 
>>> 
 On Mar 8, 2018, at 7:22 AM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:
 
 Sounds like he needs an adult real-life lesson that will leave him feeling 
 inadequate, unloved and in despair at the pointlessness of existence, so 
 anything by Pentax will do.
 
 When I was about that age someone bought me an Instamatic, which quickly 
 frustrated me, but one of my schoolfriends had an Olympus Pen-F (the 
 half-frame one) and we could use the school darkroom, so I learned a bit 
 with that. There is a digital version now - something like that would 
 probably be good.
 
 B
 
> On 8 Mar 2018, at 14:31, Eric Weir  wrote:
> 
> 
> A sister has asked me for advice on a beginning camera for her grandson. 
> He’s 12, intelligent, creative, self-disciplined—all-in-all pretty 
> precocious about many things. I have my own thoughts, which may not be 
> best, but wondered what y’all might recommend.
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Bob W-PDML]

That book looks fantastic - great idea. And I like Godfrey's idea too, despite 
my Jesuitical tendencies.

B

> On 8 Mar 2018, at 17:58, Eric Weir  wrote:
> 
> 
> But I liked Godfrey’s suggestion of instant photography. So I also 
> recommended one of the Fuji Instax cameras. A cheaper alternative that he 
> could have fun with and learn about composition, light, and exposure rather 
> than, as Ken says, "getting caught up in the technical side - f-stop, shutter 
> speed etc." 
> 
> I also recommended this book, based on Amazon reviews. 
> 
>  Seems to be specifically about photography rather than just technique.
> 
> 
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: March PUG - Arches - is up

[ann sanfedele]

On 3/8/2018 2:44 PM, John wrote:

All make my heart ache to be on the road again.

 I'm with you on that!
ann


On 3/6/2018 21:56, Brian Walters wrote:

G'day all,

Uploaded a little later than I'd hoped - Jostein's surname caused the 
server to
have conniptions...  Rob and Stan also make a long overdue appearance 
this

month.  Good to see these old faces back!

There are arches of all types in this gallery and fine selections 
all.  Enjoy!


(Jan's, Ann's and Bill's images made me wish I'd spent more time in the
southwest in 2013 - missed almost all of Utah :-) )

View here:

http://pug.komkon.org/

(you may need to refresh your browser if you see the previous gallery 
there).


Note: The automated submission process usually works well but it's not
infallible. So, if you made a submission and you don't see it in the 
gallery,

let me know.

+

Next up: 'Night'.

Full Submissions Guidelines here:

http://pug.komkon.org/general/autosubmit.html

You can submit here:

http://pug.komkon.org/submit/

Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/







--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Godfrey DiGiorgi]

Or National Geographic...

G
—
And you never had to hide a Nat Geo...

On Mar 8, 2018, at 1:44 PM, John Francis  wrote:

>>> On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 03:47:57PM -0500, John wrote:
>>> On 3/8/2018 15:27, Mark Roberts wrote:
>>> John wrote:
>>> 
 I think "French literature" is a euphemism for "dirty French Post Cards".
 
 For young American boys of a certain age, the lingerie section of the
 Sears Catalog had to suffice.
>>> 
>>> I think "Sears lingerie" has to be the least sexy sounding concept
>>> I've ever heard of.
>>> 
>> 
>> Boys had no internet back then. Where else were they going to find
>> pictures of (almost) nekkid women?
> 
> Health & Efficiency.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[John Francis]

On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 03:47:57PM -0500, John wrote:
> On 3/8/2018 15:27, Mark Roberts wrote:
> > John wrote:
> > 
> > > I think "French literature" is a euphemism for "dirty French Post Cards".
> > > 
> > > For young American boys of a certain age, the lingerie section of the
> > > Sears Catalog had to suffice.
> > 
> > I think "Sears lingerie" has to be the least sexy sounding concept
> > I've ever heard of.
> > 
> 
> Boys had no internet back then. Where else were they going to find
> pictures of (almost) nekkid women?

Health & Efficiency.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: March PUG - Arches - is up

[Brian Walters]

Can't explain the problem but glad Ann's solution worked.

Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/


> On 08 March 2018 at 09:54 Rick Womer  wrote:
> 
> 
> Clever, Ann! It worked.
> 
> Rick
> 
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 5:47 PM, ann sanfedele  wrote:
> > Rick .. maybe you can back into the whole thing by going here first :-)
> >
> > http://pug.komkon.org/18mar/slides/RW-MilwaukeeLibrary.html
> >
> > Love this shot btw .. and loving the whole gallery as well - arches make for
> > good subject matter!
> >
> > ann
> >
> >
> > On 3/7/2018 5:38 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
> >>
> >> Brian, I can't get to anything but the February PUG, with either
> >> Safari or Firefox. I've cleared the histories and removed the
> >> komkon.org cookies, but still getting only February.
> >>
> >> Ideas?
> >>
> >> Rick
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 9:56 PM, Brian Walters 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> G'day all,
> >>>
> >>> Uploaded a little later than I'd hoped - Jostein's surname caused the
> >>> server to
> >>> have conniptions...  Rob and Stan also make a long overdue appearance
> >>> this
> >>> month.  Good to see these old faces back!
> >>>
> >>> There are arches of all types in this gallery and fine selections all.
> >>> Enjoy!
> >>>
> >>> (Jan's, Ann's and Bill's images made me wish I'd spent more time in the
> >>> southwest in 2013 - missed almost all of Utah :-) )
> >>>
> >>> View here:
> >>>
> >>> http://pug.komkon.org/
> >>>
> >>> (you may need to refresh your browser if you see the previous gallery
> >>> there).
> >>>
> >>> Note: The automated submission process usually works well but it's not
> >>> infallible. So, if you made a submission and you don't see it in the
> >>> gallery,
> >>> let me know.
> >>>
> >>> +
> >>>
> >>> Next up: 'Night'.
> >>>
> >>> Full Submissions Guidelines here:
> >>>
> >>> http://pug.komkon.org/general/autosubmit.html
> >>>
> >>> You can submit here:
> >>>
> >>> http://pug.komkon.org/submit/
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>> Brian
> >>> ++
> >>> Brian Walters
> >>> Western Sydney Australia
> >>> http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>> PDML@pdml.net
> >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> >>> follow the directions.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > PDML@pdml.net
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> > follow the directions.
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[John]

On 3/8/2018 15:27, Mark Roberts wrote:

John wrote:


I think "French literature" is a euphemism for "dirty French Post Cards".

For young American boys of a certain age, the lingerie section of the
Sears Catalog had to suffice.


I think "Sears lingerie" has to be the least sexy sounding concept
I've ever heard of.
  



Boys had no internet back then. Where else were they going to find
pictures of (almost) nekkid women?

--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Bruce Walker]

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Steve Cottrell  wrote:
> On 8/3/18, Bob W-PDML, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>When I was about that age someone bought me an Instamatic, which quickly
>>frustrated me, but one of my schoolfriends had an Olympus Pen-F (the
>>half-frame one) and we could use the school darkroom, so I learned a bit
>>with that. There is a digital version now - something like that would
>>probably be good.
>
> I have the Pen F - it's not cheap!!
>
> I would go for a used Fuji X-20 - brilliant camera to learn with.

I have one in like new condition that I'd be more than happy to part with.

-- 
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Bruce Walker]

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 3:27 PM, Mark Roberts  wrote:
> John wrote:
>
>>I think "French literature" is a euphemism for "dirty French Post Cards".
>>
>>For young American boys of a certain age, the lingerie section of the
>>Sears Catalog had to suffice.
>
> I think "Sears lingerie" has to be the least sexy sounding concept
> I've ever heard of.

I can confirm that it is.

-- 
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Mark Roberts]

John wrote:

>I think "French literature" is a euphemism for "dirty French Post Cards".
>
>For young American boys of a certain age, the lingerie section of the
>Sears Catalog had to suffice.

I think "Sears lingerie" has to be the least sexy sounding concept
I've ever heard of.
 
-- 
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[John]

Tom Corbett & the Space Rangers here. Might have already encountered
Asimov & Heinlein.

No darkroom I'm afraid, but I got my first camera at age nine, a
Brownie Hawkeye inherited when my Grandmother passed away. The Rexall
Drug Store down the street returned processed film & prints in about
5 working days.

On 3/8/2018 14:33, Paul Stenquist wrote:

When I was learning photography and darkroom techniques I was
studying long division and reading the Hardy Boys. I was ten years
old.



On Mar 8, 2018, at 2:26 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi
 wrote:

I think BobW and I are soul mates. When I was getting deeper into
photography in High School, I was studying Latin, German, Old
English, Physics, Calculus, and reading S.I. Hayakawa's treatise on
general semantics, "Language in Thought and Action." I'd already
signed off on the French as savages.

G — "We all get to be young and foolish in our lives. If we survive
that, we get to be old and foolish."


On Mar 8, 2018, at 10:50 AM, mike wilson
 wrote:

Your masochism knows no bounds.


On 08 March 2018 at 16:36 Bob W-PDML 
wrote:


At the same time I was learning photography I was also starting
to read French literature...


On 8 Mar 2018, at 15:57, Godfrey DiGiorgi 
wrote:

You crack me up, Bob! That's a great line ...! :-) ...


On Mar 8, 2018, at 7:22 AM, Bob W-PDML
 wrote:

Sounds like he needs an adult real-life lesson that will
leave him feeling inadequate, unloved and in despair at the
pointlessness of existence, so anything by Pentax will do.

...


On 8 Mar 2018, at 14:31, Eric Weir 
wrote:


A sister has asked me for advice on a beginning camera
for her grandson. He’s 12, intelligent, creative,
self-disciplined—all-in-all pretty precocious about many
things. I have my own thoughts, which may not be best,
but wondered what y’all might recommend.







--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[John]

I think "French literature" is a euphemism for "dirty French Post Cards".

For young American boys of a certain age, the lingerie section of the
Sears Catalog had to suffice.

On 3/8/2018 14:26, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:

I think BobW and I are soul mates. When I was getting deeper into
photography in High School, I was studying Latin, German, Old
English, Physics, Calculus, and reading S.I. Hayakawa's treatise on
general semantics, "Language in Thought and Action." I'd already
signed off on the French as savages.

G — "We all get to be young and foolish in our lives. If we survive
that, we get to be old and foolish."


On Mar 8, 2018, at 10:50 AM, mike wilson 
wrote:

Your masochism knows no bounds.


On 08 March 2018 at 16:36 Bob W-PDML 
wrote:


At the same time I was learning photography I was also starting
to read French literature...


On 8 Mar 2018, at 15:57, Godfrey DiGiorgi 
wrote:

You crack me up, Bob! That's a great line ...! :-) ...


On Mar 8, 2018, at 7:22 AM, Bob W-PDML 
wrote:

Sounds like he needs an adult real-life lesson that will
leave him feeling inadequate, unloved and in despair at the
pointlessness of existence, so anything by Pentax will do.

...


On 8 Mar 2018, at 14:31, Eric Weir 
wrote:


A sister has asked me for advice on a beginning camera for
her grandson. He’s 12, intelligent, creative,
self-disciplined—all-in-all pretty precocious about many
things. I have my own thoughts, which may not be best, but
wondered what y’all might recommend.







--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[John]

Probably a smart phone. I don't think today's kids have much use for
real cameras.

OTOH, if the kid's really into science, he might be interested in film
and darkroom - in which case, a K1000 + SMC-P 50mm 1:1.4 might just
be the ticket.

If she wants him to jump right into digital, get him the cheapest Nikon
kit from Costco. Anything but Canon.

I think he'd probably get more out of the K1000, but I've been told
more than once that I'm out of touch with what kids are into today.
About all I do remember is how much it annoyed me when I was 12 to
have some geezer telling me what was "good for me".

Has she asked the grandson what kind of camera he wants?

On 3/8/2018 09:30, Eric Weir wrote:


A sister has asked me for advice on a beginning camera for her
grandson. He’s 12, intelligent, creative, self-disciplined—all-in-all
pretty precocious about many things. I have my own thoughts, which
may not be best, but wondered what y’all might recommend.

-

--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Igor PDML-StR]

Eric,

“Alice: Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?
The Cheshire Cat: That depends a good deal on where you want to get to.
Alice: I don't much care where.
The Cheshire Cat: Then it doesn't much matter which way you go.
Alice: ...So long as I get somewhere.
The Cheshire Cat: Oh, you're sure to do that, if only you walk long enough.”

― Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the 
Looking-Glass



You described the boy, but it is important to know what (and why) he is 
interested w.r.t. photography. Has he expressed his interest toward 
photography? Or he just wants to have a camera to take cool selfies?
Has he taken any photos (e.g. with a phone or tablet)? Have you seen 
those? They might tell you some information...


The intent and desire to guide him by his parents/grandparents is also 
an important factor. (I am sure you can, but I don't know how close 
you are to your grand-nephew.)


As other people suggested, you probably want to challenge him and his 
curiosity. But you don't want to give him something from which he'd turn 
away immediately because it is not providing what he expects and wants.


If he is geeky and likes figuring out how things work, you may want to 
lean toward more manual-capable camera. If he doesn't care about that 
much, maybe you want to have a camera with automatic capabilities but to 
give options of manual settings.


And, you want the camera to be cool and produce cool results 
that he can brag about to his peers. I don't know what it would be for 
him. Maybe instant print as suggested by Godfrey would create that 
"coolness" factor (different from the mainstream, while providing 
immediate gratification).


I wouldn't jump into DSLR's. Whether to get a system with interchangeable 
lenses (e.g. micro-2/3) or not, - that would depend on the inclinations of 
the kiddo.
If yes, meaning that the kid is expected to be very interested (and I'd 
talk to him; at 12, he is grown up enough for that) and have sufficient
guidance, - I'd consider starting with a reasonable "normal" prime lens, 
adding a moderate zoom next, or the other way around.

Otherwise, starting with a P with plenty of manual controls might be
sufficient to see if the interest lasts.

HTH,

Igor


On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 9:30 AM, Eric Weir wrote:



A sister has asked me for advice on a beginning camera for her grandson.
He’s 12, intelligent, creative, self-disciplined—all-in-all pretty
precocious about many things. I have my own thoughts, which may not be
best, but wondered what y’all might recommend.


--
Eric Weir


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: March PUG - Arches - is up

[Daniel J. Matyola]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdlyi5mckg0

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 2:44 PM, John  wrote:

> All make my heart ache to be on the road again.
>
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: March PUG - Arches - is up

[John]

All make my heart ache to be on the road again.

On 3/6/2018 21:56, Brian Walters wrote:

G'day all,

Uploaded a little later than I'd hoped - Jostein's surname caused the server to
have conniptions...  Rob and Stan also make a long overdue appearance this
month.  Good to see these old faces back!

There are arches of all types in this gallery and fine selections all.  Enjoy!

(Jan's, Ann's and Bill's images made me wish I'd spent more time in the
southwest in 2013 - missed almost all of Utah :-) )

View here:

http://pug.komkon.org/

(you may need to refresh your browser if you see the previous gallery there).

Note: The automated submission process usually works well but it's not
infallible. So, if you made a submission and you don't see it in the gallery,
let me know.

+

Next up: 'Night'.

Full Submissions Guidelines here:

http://pug.komkon.org/general/autosubmit.html

You can submit here:

http://pug.komkon.org/submit/

Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/




--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Paul Stenquist]

Grace has done quite well with my old K7. I have a K5 with battery grip that’s 
looking for a new home.
Paul

> On Mar 8, 2018, at 12:57 PM, Eric Weir  wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Mar 8, 2018, at 12:03 PM, Ken Waller  wrote:
>> 
>> Eric, whatever you wind up with I'd suggest it have both auto capture mode 
>> and a manual mode. With auto he can learn some of the non technical parts of 
>> photography - composition, framing etc without getting caught up in the 
>> technical side - f-stop, shutter speed etc.
> 
> Thanks to all who have responded. Something I identified with or helpful in 
> all the responses. 
> 
> My first digital was an ist*D. I bought it because of a photo shown here that 
> was taken with one. (Prayer Service at St.Michaels. Don’t remember the 
> photographer.) 
> 
> In retrospect, it was my digital K-1000. My first thought was along the lines 
> of Bob’s suggestion, although with Fuji equipment rather than Olympus—Fuji 
> X-E2S with their XF 27 2.8 lens. 
> 
> But I liked Godfrey’s suggestion of instant photography. So I also 
> recommended one of the Fuji Instax cameras. A cheaper alternative that he 
> could have fun with and learn about composition, light, and exposure rather 
> than, as Ken says, "getting caught up in the technical side - f-stop, shutter 
> speed etc." 
> 
> I also recommended this book, based on Amazon reviews. 
> 
>  Seems to be specifically about photography rather than just technique.
> 
> --
> Eric Weir
> Decatur, GA  USA
> eew...@bellsouth.net
> 
> "What is man without the beasts? If all the beasts were gone, 
> men would die from a great loneliness of spirit." 
> 
> - Chief Seattle
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Paul Stenquist]

When I was learning photography and darkroom techniques I was studying long 
division and reading the Hardy Boys. I was ten years old.


> On Mar 8, 2018, at 2:26 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi  wrote:
> 
> I think BobW and I are soul mates. When I was getting deeper into photography 
> in High School, I was studying Latin, German, Old English, Physics, Calculus, 
> and reading S.I. Hayakawa's treatise on general semantics, "Language in 
> Thought and Action." I'd already signed off on the French as savages. 
> 
> G
> —
> "We all get to be young and foolish in our lives. If we survive that, we get 
> to be old and foolish."
> 
>> On Mar 8, 2018, at 10:50 AM, mike wilson  wrote:
>> 
>> Your masochism knows no bounds.
>> 
>>> On 08 March 2018 at 16:36 Bob W-PDML  wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> At the same time I was learning photography I was also starting to read 
>>> French literature...
>>> 
 On 8 Mar 2018, at 15:57, Godfrey DiGiorgi  wrote:
 
 You crack me up, Bob! That's a great line ...! :-)
 ...
 
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 7:22 AM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:
> 
> Sounds like he needs an adult real-life lesson that will leave him 
> feeling inadequate, unloved and in despair at the pointlessness of 
> existence, so anything by Pentax will do.
> 
> ...
> 
>> On 8 Mar 2018, at 14:31, Eric Weir  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> A sister has asked me for advice on a beginning camera for her grandson. 
>> He’s 12, intelligent, creative, self-disciplined—all-in-all pretty 
>> precocious about many things. I have my own thoughts, which may not be 
>> best, but wondered what y’all might recommend.
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Steve Cottrell]

On 8/3/18, Bob W-PDML, discombobulated, unleashed:

>When I was about that age someone bought me an Instamatic, which quickly
>frustrated me, but one of my schoolfriends had an Olympus Pen-F (the
>half-frame one) and we could use the school darkroom, so I learned a bit
>with that. There is a digital version now - something like that would
>probably be good.

I have the Pen F - it's not cheap!!

I would go for a used Fuji X-20 - brilliant camera to learn with.



-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__UK Shoot / Edit and
||  (O)  |Live Broadcast News
--
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Godfrey DiGiorgi]

I think BobW and I are soul mates. When I was getting deeper into photography 
in High School, I was studying Latin, German, Old English, Physics, Calculus, 
and reading S.I. Hayakawa's treatise on general semantics, "Language in Thought 
and Action." I'd already signed off on the French as savages. 

G
—
"We all get to be young and foolish in our lives. If we survive that, we get to 
be old and foolish."

> On Mar 8, 2018, at 10:50 AM, mike wilson  wrote:
> 
> Your masochism knows no bounds.
> 
>> On 08 March 2018 at 16:36 Bob W-PDML  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> At the same time I was learning photography I was also starting to read 
>> French literature...
>> 
>>> On 8 Mar 2018, at 15:57, Godfrey DiGiorgi  wrote:
>>> 
>>> You crack me up, Bob! That's a great line ...! :-)
>>> ...
>>> 
 On Mar 8, 2018, at 7:22 AM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:
 
 Sounds like he needs an adult real-life lesson that will leave him feeling 
 inadequate, unloved and in despair at the pointlessness of existence, so 
 anything by Pentax will do.
 
 ...
 
> On 8 Mar 2018, at 14:31, Eric Weir  wrote:
> 
> 
> A sister has asked me for advice on a beginning camera for her grandson. 
> He’s 12, intelligent, creative, self-disciplined—all-in-all pretty 
> precocious about many things. I have my own thoughts, which may not be 
> best, but wondered what y’all might recommend.
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[mike wilson]

Your masochism knows no bounds.

> On 08 March 2018 at 16:36 Bob W-PDML  wrote:
> 
> 
> At the same time I was learning photography I was also starting to read 
> French literature...
> 
> > On 8 Mar 2018, at 15:57, Godfrey DiGiorgi  wrote:
> > 
> > You crack me up, Bob! That's a great line ...! :-)
> > 
> > When I was that age, I'd already bought my own first camera (a Minolta 16-P 
> > which cost me the grand sum of $19 at Camera Craft in New Rochelle, NY), 
> > having been given a couple of Kodak cameras before then. But I wanted 
> > something more adjustable. My mother loaned me her Argus C3... with which I 
> > learned a great deal about ruining film until I figured out how to work 
> > aperture, shutter speed, and focus. AND remembered to wind on to the next 
> > frame before re-cocking the shutter. 
> > 
> > There really isn't a modern equivalent. I'd never start a youngster on a 
> > 35mm film camera nowadays, and any digital camera today has way more 
> > capabilities and automation ... And the expectations of young people today 
> > are quite different from my expectations of a camera in 1968. 
> > 
> > However, as a teacher of photography, my goal in getting people who are 
> > interested started out is to let them begin with focus and understanding 
> > light, and understanding the difference between what your eyes see and what 
> > the camera might record. Nothing on the market today would start a young 
> > person off with a better basic understanding of those things than an 
> > instant film camera with manual focus, and it would also serve to give them 
> > the immediate return on their effort that is so important to the learning 
> > experience. Something like the Lomo Instant Square I obtained recently or a 
> > Polaroid SX-70 with the Polaroid Original film would do a great job of 
> > teaching these things, and would also be special, different, from the 
> > smartphone experience in ways that would be beneficial to learning how to 
> > be patient, how to be economical of exposures, and how to "look, think, and 
> > consider" before shooting. 
> > 
> > G
> > —
> > No matter where you go, there you are.
> > 
> > 
> >> On Mar 8, 2018, at 7:22 AM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:
> >> 
> >> Sounds like he needs an adult real-life lesson that will leave him feeling 
> >> inadequate, unloved and in despair at the pointlessness of existence, so 
> >> anything by Pentax will do.
> >> 
> >> When I was about that age someone bought me an Instamatic, which quickly 
> >> frustrated me, but one of my schoolfriends had an Olympus Pen-F (the 
> >> half-frame one) and we could use the school darkroom, so I learned a bit 
> >> with that. There is a digital version now - something like that would 
> >> probably be good.
> >> 
> >> B
> >> 
> >>> On 8 Mar 2018, at 14:31, Eric Weir  wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> A sister has asked me for advice on a beginning camera for her grandson. 
> >>> He’s 12, intelligent, creative, self-disciplined—all-in-all pretty 
> >>> precocious about many things. I have my own thoughts, which may not be 
> >>> best, but wondered what y’all might recommend.
> >>>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Daniel J. Matyola]

Thanks for sharing that.


Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 11:36 AM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:

> At the same time I was learning photography I was also starting to read
> French literature...
>
>
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Eric Weir]

> On Mar 8, 2018, at 12:03 PM, Ken Waller  wrote:
> 
> Eric, whatever you wind up with I'd suggest it have both auto capture mode 
> and a manual mode. With auto he can learn some of the non technical parts of 
> photography - composition, framing etc without getting caught up in the 
> technical side - f-stop, shutter speed etc.

Thanks to all who have responded. Something I identified with or helpful in all 
the responses. 

My first digital was an ist*D. I bought it because of a photo shown here that 
was taken with one. (Prayer Service at St.Michaels. Don’t remember the 
photographer.) 

In retrospect, it was my digital K-1000. My first thought was along the lines 
of Bob’s suggestion, although with Fuji equipment rather than Olympus—Fuji 
X-E2S with their XF 27 2.8 lens. 

But I liked Godfrey’s suggestion of instant photography. So I also recommended 
one of the Fuji Instax cameras. A cheaper alternative that he could have fun 
with and learn about composition, light, and exposure rather than, as Ken says, 
"getting caught up in the technical side - f-stop, shutter speed etc." 

I also recommended this book, based on Amazon reviews. 

 Seems to be specifically about photography rather than just technique.

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net

"What is man without the beasts? If all the beasts were gone, 
men would die from a great loneliness of spirit." 

- Chief Seattle






-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Ken Waller]

Eric, whatever you wind up with I'd suggest it have both auto capture mode and 
a manual mode. With auto he can learn some of the non technical parts of 
photography - composition, framing etc without getting caught up in the 
technical side - f-stop, shutter speed etc.



-Original Message-
>From: Eric Weir 
>Subject: Cameras for a kid
>
>
>A sister has asked me for advice on a beginning camera for her grandson. He’s 
>12, intelligent, creative, self-disciplined—all-in-all pretty precocious about 
>many things. I have my own thoughts, which may not be best, but wondered what 
>y’all might recommend.
>
>--
>Eric Weir
>Decatur, GA  USA
>eew...@bellsouth.net
>
>"Imagining the other is a powerful antidote to fanaticism and hatred." 
>
>- Amos Oz


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Bob W-PDML]

At the same time I was learning photography I was also starting to read French 
literature...

> On 8 Mar 2018, at 15:57, Godfrey DiGiorgi  wrote:
> 
> You crack me up, Bob! That's a great line ...! :-)
> 
> When I was that age, I'd already bought my own first camera (a Minolta 16-P 
> which cost me the grand sum of $19 at Camera Craft in New Rochelle, NY), 
> having been given a couple of Kodak cameras before then. But I wanted 
> something more adjustable. My mother loaned me her Argus C3... with which I 
> learned a great deal about ruining film until I figured out how to work 
> aperture, shutter speed, and focus. AND remembered to wind on to the next 
> frame before re-cocking the shutter. 
> 
> There really isn't a modern equivalent. I'd never start a youngster on a 35mm 
> film camera nowadays, and any digital camera today has way more capabilities 
> and automation ... And the expectations of young people today are quite 
> different from my expectations of a camera in 1968. 
> 
> However, as a teacher of photography, my goal in getting people who are 
> interested started out is to let them begin with focus and understanding 
> light, and understanding the difference between what your eyes see and what 
> the camera might record. Nothing on the market today would start a young 
> person off with a better basic understanding of those things than an instant 
> film camera with manual focus, and it would also serve to give them the 
> immediate return on their effort that is so important to the learning 
> experience. Something like the Lomo Instant Square I obtained recently or a 
> Polaroid SX-70 with the Polaroid Original film would do a great job of 
> teaching these things, and would also be special, different, from the 
> smartphone experience in ways that would be beneficial to learning how to be 
> patient, how to be economical of exposures, and how to "look, think, and 
> consider" before shooting. 
> 
> G
> —
> No matter where you go, there you are.
> 
> 
>> On Mar 8, 2018, at 7:22 AM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:
>> 
>> Sounds like he needs an adult real-life lesson that will leave him feeling 
>> inadequate, unloved and in despair at the pointlessness of existence, so 
>> anything by Pentax will do.
>> 
>> When I was about that age someone bought me an Instamatic, which quickly 
>> frustrated me, but one of my schoolfriends had an Olympus Pen-F (the 
>> half-frame one) and we could use the school darkroom, so I learned a bit 
>> with that. There is a digital version now - something like that would 
>> probably be good.
>> 
>> B
>> 
>>> On 8 Mar 2018, at 14:31, Eric Weir  wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> A sister has asked me for advice on a beginning camera for her grandson. 
>>> He’s 12, intelligent, creative, self-disciplined—all-in-all pretty 
>>> precocious about many things. I have my own thoughts, which may not be 
>>> best, but wondered what y’all might recommend.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Daniel J. Matyola]

I'd start with something like a WG-3, before moving to DSLR.


Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 9:30 AM, Eric Weir  wrote:

>
> A sister has asked me for advice on a beginning camera for her grandson.
> He’s 12, intelligent, creative, self-disciplined—all-in-all pretty
> precocious about many things. I have my own thoughts, which may not be
> best, but wondered what y’all might recommend.
>
> 
> --
> Eric Weir
> Decatur, GA  USA
> eew...@bellsouth.net
>
> "Imagining the other is a powerful antidote to fanaticism and hatred."
>
> - Amos Oz
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Godfrey DiGiorgi]

You crack me up, Bob! That's a great line ...! :-)

When I was that age, I'd already bought my own first camera (a Minolta 16-P 
which cost me the grand sum of $19 at Camera Craft in New Rochelle, NY), having 
been given a couple of Kodak cameras before then. But I wanted something more 
adjustable. My mother loaned me her Argus C3... with which I learned a great 
deal about ruining film until I figured out how to work aperture, shutter 
speed, and focus. AND remembered to wind on to the next frame before re-cocking 
the shutter. 

There really isn't a modern equivalent. I'd never start a youngster on a 35mm 
film camera nowadays, and any digital camera today has way more capabilities 
and automation ... And the expectations of young people today are quite 
different from my expectations of a camera in 1968. 

However, as a teacher of photography, my goal in getting people who are 
interested started out is to let them begin with focus and understanding light, 
and understanding the difference between what your eyes see and what the camera 
might record. Nothing on the market today would start a young person off with a 
better basic understanding of those things than an instant film camera with 
manual focus, and it would also serve to give them the immediate return on 
their effort that is so important to the learning experience. Something like 
the Lomo Instant Square I obtained recently or a Polaroid SX-70 with the 
Polaroid Original film would do a great job of teaching these things, and would 
also be special, different, from the smartphone experience in ways that would 
be beneficial to learning how to be patient, how to be economical of exposures, 
and how to "look, think, and consider" before shooting. 

G
—
No matter where you go, there you are.


> On Mar 8, 2018, at 7:22 AM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:
> 
> Sounds like he needs an adult real-life lesson that will leave him feeling 
> inadequate, unloved and in despair at the pointlessness of existence, so 
> anything by Pentax will do.
> 
> When I was about that age someone bought me an Instamatic, which quickly 
> frustrated me, but one of my schoolfriends had an Olympus Pen-F (the 
> half-frame one) and we could use the school darkroom, so I learned a bit with 
> that. There is a digital version now - something like that would probably be 
> good.
> 
> B
> 
>> On 8 Mar 2018, at 14:31, Eric Weir  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> A sister has asked me for advice on a beginning camera for her grandson. 
>> He’s 12, intelligent, creative, self-disciplined—all-in-all pretty 
>> precocious about many things. I have my own thoughts, which may not be best, 
>> but wondered what y’all might recommend.
>> 
>> --
>> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Yolanda Rowe]

Hi, Eric:

My son started with a digital point & shoot. Once he was frustrated
with its limitations, I began teaching him with my *istDS in manual
mode. We'd go out and shoot the same things (both using the *istDS
bodies), and then compare the captures. To this day, he prefers the
*istDS body over any of the others I own (i.e., K10D, K20D, K-5, &
K-3). Mama's little Pentaxian (6'2") says the other cameras are "too
big", even without a battery grip.

I would have loved to have started him with my K1000, but there wasn't
a convenient and cost effective solution for processing. I used
smaller cards to teach him shot discipline.

Cheers,

Yonnie

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:30 AM, Eric Weir  wrote:
>
> A sister has asked me for advice on a beginning camera for her grandson. He’s 
> 12, intelligent, creative, self-disciplined—all-in-all pretty precocious 
> about many things. I have my own thoughts, which may not be best, but 
> wondered what y’all might recommend.
>
> --
> Eric Weir
> Decatur, GA  USA
> eew...@bellsouth.net
>
> "Imagining the other is a powerful antidote to fanaticism and hatred."
>
> - Amos Oz
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cameras for a kid

[Bob W-PDML]

Sounds like he needs an adult real-life lesson that will leave him feeling 
inadequate, unloved and in despair at the pointlessness of existence, so 
anything by Pentax will do.

When I was about that age someone bought me an Instamatic, which quickly 
frustrated me, but one of my schoolfriends had an Olympus Pen-F (the half-frame 
one) and we could use the school darkroom, so I learned a bit with that. There 
is a digital version now - something like that would probably be good.

B

> On 8 Mar 2018, at 14:31, Eric Weir  wrote:
> 
> 
> A sister has asked me for advice on a beginning camera for her grandson. He’s 
> 12, intelligent, creative, self-disciplined—all-in-all pretty precocious 
> about many things. I have my own thoughts, which may not be best, but 
> wondered what y’all might recommend.
> 
> --
> 
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Cameras for a kid

[Eric Weir]

A sister has asked me for advice on a beginning camera for her grandson. He’s 
12, intelligent, creative, self-disciplined—all-in-all pretty precocious about 
many things. I have my own thoughts, which may not be best, but wondered what 
y’all might recommend.

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net

"Imagining the other is a powerful antidote to fanaticism and hatred." 

- Amos Oz


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: March PUG - Arches - is up

[Steve Cottrell]

On 7/3/18, Brian Walters, discombobulated, unleashed:

>
>View here:
>
>http://pug.komkon.org/

What a fabulous gallery! Well done all - hit rate was 100% - not a duffer among 
them ;-)

All superb.


-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__UK Shoot / Edit and
||  (O)  |Live Broadcast News
--
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.