Re: storing photos in the field: OTG device

2005-03-23 Thread Frantisek
 I just need some good storage now, and then shell out the bucks for a
 full featured device much later...

RS I'd recommend the PDX7 then, it's cheap, small, fast, has good battery life,
RS doubles as a AA charger, can handle a 100GB drive and verifies transfers.

Hi Rob,

thanks for the comment. From the comments on the list, I wouldn't
hesitate getting the PDX7 - as far all the experience with it here seemed
good. However, I would still like to get later a device with
LCD and zooming, now even some devices support Wi-Fi addon cards
(afaik Jobo Gigavue Pro II or what's its name), so the OTG box
would be just an inexpensive stopgap for now. A PSD with Wi-Fi capability is 
quite
intruiquing! Especially if it could actually send selected photos, not just
act as a FTP server (which I believe is what the Jobo with WiFi card
does).

Good light!
   fra



Re: storing photos in the field: OTG device

2005-03-23 Thread Leon Altoff
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:51:23 +0100, Frantisek wrote:

   I am looking for a HDD enclosure that has OTG USB specifications -
   basically a copy button - so I can attach a card reader to it and
   it would copy all the files from the card trought the reader onto
   the HDD. Just a no frills backup storage. There are some really
   cheap ones, which might be nice for a project that I will do next
   month, cheaper than the Compactdrive even.

   I saw one named LOOK and also few others, just a HDD box with OTG
   circuitry inside and external box with AA batteries.

   Any thoughts on them? Speed?

Hi,

I (and many others on the list) have an X-drive II.  It's basic and
does the job with reasonable speed.  It's been superseded a couple of
times but you can still buy it some places.

The Compact drive PD7X uses AA batteries and is supposed to be faster
and smaller and I would consider it if I was looking for another basic
model.

Of the brands that show pictures only the Flashtrax supports Pentax RAW
format, but you pay a lot more for the ability to view pictures.  The
Flashtrax is also a lot bigger than the X-drive.

Hope this helps.


 Leon

http://www.bluering.org.au
http://www.bluering.org.au/leon




Re: storing photos in the field: OTG device

2005-03-23 Thread Fred Widall
Fra,

Like several others here I chose a PD7X.

I went with a 40GB drive. Its powered by 4 AA batteries, has a built in
dual voltage battery recharger, and is very simple to operate.

To copy the memory card to the drive you insert the card,
place the power switch to the 'Card' position and press the
'Ok' button. That's it. To download to your PC you connect
the supplied USB cable, put the power switch to 'Disk'
and it shows up as a removable drive. Then just drag and drop
the files. Each time you copy a card it creates a new directory
on its internal drive which is helpful for organising.

Here are two reviews of it.

http://fhoude34.free.fr/PD7x%20Review.htm
http://www.jaldigital.com.au/pd7xreview.html

Mine cost me CAD$300 (inclusive of shipping and taxes).
--
 Fred Widall,
 Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 URL: http://www.ist.uwaterloo.ca/~fwwidall
--



Re: storing photos in the field: OTG device

2005-03-23 Thread Bob W
Hi,

Wednesday, March 23, 2005, 12:12:36 PM, Fred wrote:

 Fra,

 Like several others here I chose a PD7X.

 I went with a 40GB drive. Its powered by 4 AA batteries, has a built in
 dual voltage battery recharger, and is very simple to operate.

how long do the batteries last on a device like that?

-- 
Cheers,
 Bob



Re: storing photos in the field: OTG device

2005-03-23 Thread Fred Widall
I've not done any testing myself but one of the reviewers
states 'You could backup at least 30 GB of DATA without recharging the
battery.' Though I would guess it would be dependant upon
the initial state of your batteries, and the speed of the memory
card.

--
 Fred Widall,
 Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 URL: http://www.ist.uwaterloo.ca/~fwwidall
--

On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Bob W wrote:

 how long do the batteries last on a device like that?
  Bob




Re: storing photos in the field: OTG device

2005-03-23 Thread Frantisek
Hi, thanks for the suggestion, but I specifically asked for impression
of the OTG (On the go) USB enclosures... :-)  *OTG means it can
suck files from any mass storage compatible USB camera or card
reader.

My friend got issued the XS Drive (original, not II) from his agency
and after we used it, we both agreed that it's total crap - I hope it
won't disappoint you ;-) The main problem with it was speed (abysmal)
and autonomy. From the tests here
http://fhoude34.free.fr/PortableHD.htm
you can transfer only 3-4GB at best on single charge - which is
marginal for us, and our experience was similar, sometime even worse.
Also, the XS I had only USB 1.1 (I know the II has USB 2.0 though).

Compactdrive seems nice, and even though some people had written on
DPREVIEW that its lack of voltage regulator can create problems with
HDDs and Microdrives, so far the experience here on list was good, if
I remember.

The reason I am asking just about the OTG enclosures is that
they seem the cheapest reasonable solution - much better autonomy than
these XS Drives and similar ones (one test mentioned around 10GB on
single charge), while speed is getting closer to the Compactdrive -
around 2.5-3MB/s reading from USB2 card reader. At the price (~40
USD), I can buy one just for now, and then later get a better unit
than the Compactdrive later, when the next generation of these PSDs is
available. And I could reuse the HDD in the next unit. From the tests
and reviews I saw, I am not interested in devices like the XS Drive -
all are too slow, and don't have enough battery life. And after
getting a better PSD later, I could still use the enclosure as
portable USB 2.0 HDD.

Thanks for comments anyway ;-)

Frantisek



Re: storing photos in the field: OTG device

2005-03-23 Thread brooksdj
 Hi,
 
 Wednesday, March 23, 2005, 12:12:36 PM, Fred wrote:
 
  Fra,
 
  Like several others here I chose a PD7X.
 
  I went with a 40GB drive. Its powered by 4 AA batteries, has a built in
  dual voltage battery recharger, and is very simple to operate.

I might go with the Flashtrax. Henrys are selling them in 20-40-80? Gig 
versions. Yje 20
is arund 
$450.00 and thats all i would need. Besides it has the screen for checking to 
see if my
pics made the 
transfer.   lol
The PD7X is screenless, is it not.


Dave




Re: storing photos in the field: OTG device

2005-03-23 Thread Rob Studdert
On 23 Mar 2005 at 13:40, Frantisek wrote:

 *OTG means it can
 suck files from any mass storage compatible USB camera or card
 reader.

So what portable devices (aside from a laptop PC) can do this?


Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998



Re: storing photos in the field: OTG device

2005-03-23 Thread Frantisek

Wednesday, March 23, 2005, 2:53:48 PM, Rob wrote:
RS On 23 Mar 2005 at 13:40, Frantisek wrote:

 *OTG means it can
 suck files from any mass storage compatible USB camera or card
 reader.

RS So what portable devices (aside from a laptop PC) can do this?

I am not that sure how OTG works with ordinary mass storage devices,
but apparently ( http://www.printerboyweb.net/pro_stuff/LOOK/index.php
- review of one such device) you can attach an USB card reader to it
and it will work. It is also supposed to work with most cameras,
although that seems reduntant to me if I can use a small reader - most
cameras have slow reading of CF cards and a lot still have USB 1.1,
while I could attach a fast reader to the for example e-look device.

I just need some good storage now, and then shell out the bucks for a
full featured device much later...

Good light!
   fra



Re: storing photos in the field: OTG device

2005-03-23 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Hi,

The PD7X is screenless, but I wonder if a screen is really needed.  It adds
size, weight, cost, drains batteries faster.  Are we that unsure of the
technology involved in xferring a file from one storage medium to another?

Shel 


 [Original Message]
 From: Dave Brooks

 Besides it has the screen for checking to see if my
 pics made the transfer.   lol
 The PD7X is screenless, is it not.




Re: storing photos in the field: OTG device

2005-03-23 Thread Peter Belak
Hi Frantisek, 

after I got rid of ImageTank (usb1.1, 10GB HDD) I wanted something
faster with integrated battery and large drive. Two weeks ago I found
Apacer Share Steno CD211 at one online computer shop. It was cheap
(1700,- Sk + VAT) for device only - no disk. So I also bought 60GB
harddrive and small USB2 CF reader. After upgrading the firmware,  the
device can download files from *ist D, but I prefer using it with CF
reader as it is much faster. I don't have exact times and did not test
the battery operating time, but can do so this evening if anyone
interested. I did not find any reviews of this small device, so maybe
it is not a perfect one, but it was cheap and available here, and so
far it works good (well, in two weeks I used it only about 4 times to
download files from CF card).
Specifications can be found here:
http://www.apacer.com/apacer_english/product_html/share_steno_cd211.asp

 I am not that sure how OTG works with ordinary mass storage devices,
 but apparently ( http://www.printerboyweb.net/pro_stuff/LOOK/index.php
 - review of one such device) you can attach an USB card reader to it
 and it will work. It is also supposed to work with most cameras,
 although that seems reduntant to me if I can use a small reader - most
 cameras have slow reading of CF cards and a lot still have USB 1.1,
 while I could attach a fast reader to the for example e-look device.
 
 I just need some good storage now, and then shell out the bucks for a
 full featured device much later...
 
 Good light!
fra
 
 

Regards

Peter Belak



Re: storing photos in the field: OTG device

2005-03-23 Thread Frantisek

Ahoj Peter,

kde jsi ten Steno nasel? Nemohl jsem ho najit nikde v CR ani SR, ani
EU, pouze americke online shopy. Presne tenhle a jeste podobny od
ByteCC me hodne zajimaly.

For the others:

Yes, that's one of the units I was interested in. Please, after you
know some more from usage, post it. Especially the transfer speeds
from CF reader to Steno would be great. The Steno has a built-in
battery, is it removable? The ByteCC and Look devices use external AA
battery holder (or I guess I could rig an AA holder plugging it into
the DC-IN socket on the Steno). Could you also try if it is USB bus
powered (i.e. when you connect it to the computer as an
external hdd to transfer your photos back, does it draw power from the
USB bus, or do you need to use an external DC adapter?)

Thanks a lot.

Dakujem vela.

Frantisek

Good light!
   fra



Re: storing photos in the field: OTG device

2005-03-23 Thread Peter Belak
Ahoj Frantisek,

 kde jsi ten Steno nasel? 
na atcomp.sk, myslim, ze je to pobocka ceskeho atcompu.
Konkretne na 
http://www.atcomp.sk/presmerovani.aspx?goto=/zbozi_detail.aspx$$zbozi=53934

Now english:
 Yes, that's one of the units I was interested in. Please, after you
 know some more from usage, post it. Especially the transfer speeds
 from CF reader to Steno would be great. 
Will test this later today and let you know.

 The Steno has a built-in battery, is it removable? 
It is not removable. Well, you can remove it, but it is located under
the hardrive, so you would have to remove that first. I would not want
to do it everyday.

 battery holder (or I guess I could rig an AA holder plugging it into
 the DC-IN socket on the Steno). 
I plan to try it this way. I already got the 4xAA holder, now I need
that power jack. It needs DC 5V/2.5A.

 Could you also try if it is USB bus
 powered (i.e. when you connect it to the computer as an
 external hdd to transfer your photos back, does it draw power from the
 USB bus, or do you need to use an external DC adapter?)
It always uses its internal battery or a DC adapter.
It has a power button and you have to turn it on, even if connected to
the computer.
When the battery is dead, it just doesn't start without DC adapter.

Regards

Peter Belak



Re: storing photos in the field: OTG device

2005-03-23 Thread Village Idiot
Speaking of CompactDrive PD7X, I thought this was interesting:

http://www.compactdrive.us/

Village Idiot



 Fra,
 
 Like several others here I chose a PD7X.
 
 I went with a 40GB drive. Its powered by 4 AA batteries, has a built in
 dual voltage battery recharger, and is very simple to operate.
 
 To copy the memory card to the drive you insert the card,
 place the power switch to the 'Card' position and press the
 'Ok' button. That's it. To download to your PC you connect
 the supplied USB cable, put the power switch to 'Disk'
 and it shows up as a removable drive. Then just drag and drop
 the files. Each time you copy a card it creates a new directory
 on its internal drive which is helpful for organising.
 
 Here are two reviews of it.
 
 http://fhoude34.free.fr/PD7x%20Review.htm
 http://www.jaldigital.com.au/pd7xreview.html
 
 Mine cost me CAD$300 (inclusive of shipping and taxes).
 --
  Fred Widall,
  Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  URL: http://www.ist.uwaterloo.ca/~fwwidall
 --
 



Re: storing photos in the field: OTG device

2005-03-23 Thread Peter Belak
Hi Frantisek,

I tested the speed with CF reader. The details are:
- Apacer Photo Steno II - 2GB CF card
- iTec Pocket Reader USB 2
- 150 PEF files - 2039MBytes
- total transfer time: 11 minutes, 50 seconds

The Steno was powered from DC adapter. The bad thing is that there is
no progress indicator. It only displays Backup with one to three
dots when backing up, and Backup finished, press any key when
everything went OK.
Here is the picture of whole setup: http://www.pepek.sk/fp/steno.jpg

I am taking the Steno for my two week trip to Egypt on friday and
really hope it will work ok :-) I will report more on this later.

Regards

Peter Belak



Re: storing photos in the field: OTG device

2005-03-23 Thread Fred Widall
That's funny.

Someone not too happy with their PD7X apparently.

From http://www.compactdrive.com/ .

The statements can be seen at:

www.compactdrive.net
www.compactdrive.info
www.compactdrive.us
www.compactdrive.jp
www.compactdrive.co.nz
www.compactdrive.co.uk
www.compactdrive.com.tw

We wish to state for the record that ALL of the above domain names and
websites are owned by one single entity, the former New Zealand
Distributor for CompactDrive PD7X which goes under the trading name of
CompactDrive International Co. Ltd / Top International Limited / Heard
Park Group of Companies (here from referred to as Heard Park)



--
 Fred Widall,
 Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 URL: http://www.ist.uwaterloo.ca/~fwwidall
--

On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Village Idiot wrote:

 Speaking of CompactDrive PD7X, I thought this was interesting:

 http://www.compactdrive.us/

 Village Idiot



  Fra,
 
  Like several others here I chose a PD7X.
 
  I went with a 40GB drive. Its powered by 4 AA batteries, has a built in
  dual voltage battery recharger, and is very simple to operate.
 
  To copy the memory card to the drive you insert the card,
  place the power switch to the 'Card' position and press the
  'Ok' button. That's it. To download to your PC you connect
  the supplied USB cable, put the power switch to 'Disk'
  and it shows up as a removable drive. Then just drag and drop
  the files. Each time you copy a card it creates a new directory
  on its internal drive which is helpful for organising.
 
  Here are two reviews of it.
 
  http://fhoude34.free.fr/PD7x%20Review.htm
  http://www.jaldigital.com.au/pd7xreview.html
 
  Mine cost me CAD$300 (inclusive of shipping and taxes).
  --
   Fred Widall,
   Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   URL: http://www.ist.uwaterloo.ca/~fwwidall
  --
 




Re: storing photos in the field: OTG device

2005-03-23 Thread Bruce Dayton
Seems that Heard Park Group has stooped way below anything reasonable.
For the record my CompactDrive PD6a is working wonderfully and I am
very happy with it.

Bruce


Wednesday, March 23, 2005, 9:53:21 AM, you wrote:

FW That's funny.

FW Someone not too happy with their PD7X apparently.

FW From http://www.compactdrive.com/ .

FW The statements can be seen at:

FW www.compactdrive.net
FW www.compactdrive.info
FW www.compactdrive.us
FW www.compactdrive.jp
FW www.compactdrive.co.nz
FW www.compactdrive.co.uk
FW www.compactdrive.com.tw

FW We wish to state for the record that ALL of the above domain names and
FW websites are owned by one single entity, the former New Zealand
FW Distributor for CompactDrive PD7X which goes under the trading name of
FW CompactDrive International Co. Ltd / Top International Limited / Heard
FW Park Group of Companies (here from referred to as Heard Park)



FW --
FW  Fred Widall,
FW  Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW  URL: http://www.ist.uwaterloo.ca/~fwwidall
FW --

FW On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Village Idiot wrote:

 Speaking of CompactDrive PD7X, I thought this was interesting:

 http://www.compactdrive.us/

 Village Idiot



  Fra,
 
  Like several others here I chose a PD7X.
 
  I went with a 40GB drive. Its powered by 4 AA batteries, has a built in
  dual voltage battery recharger, and is very simple to operate.
 
  To copy the memory card to the drive you insert the card,
  place the power switch to the 'Card' position and press the
  'Ok' button. That's it. To download to your PC you connect
  the supplied USB cable, put the power switch to 'Disk'
  and it shows up as a removable drive. Then just drag and drop
  the files. Each time you copy a card it creates a new directory
  on its internal drive which is helpful for organising.
 
  Here are two reviews of it.
 
  http://fhoude34.free.fr/PD7x%20Review.htm
  http://www.jaldigital.com.au/pd7xreview.html
 
  Mine cost me CAD$300 (inclusive of shipping and taxes).
 
 --
   Fred Widall,
   Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   URL: http://www.ist.uwaterloo.ca/~fwwidall
 
 --
 






Re: storing photos in the field: OTG device

2005-03-23 Thread brooksdj
For the time being, yes.g

However to quote the good folks at Possum Lake Lodge: I'm a man,I can 
change,If i have
to,I 
quess.vbg


Dave   

 Hi,
 
 The PD7X is screenless, but I wonder if a screen is really needed.  It adds
 size, weight, cost, drains batteries faster.  Are we that unsure of the
 technology involved in xferring a file from one storage medium to another?
 
 Shel 
 
 
  [Original Message]
  From: Dave Brooks
 
  Besides it has the screen for checking to see if my
  pics made the transfer.   lol
  The PD7X is screenless, is it not.
 
 






Re: storing photos in the field: OTG device

2005-03-23 Thread Shel Belinkoff
I really enjoy The Red Green Show ;-))

Shel 


 [Original Message]
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
 Date: 3/23/2005 10:17:13 AM
 Subject: Re: storing photos in the field: OTG device

 For the time being, yes.g

 However to quote the good folks at Possum Lake Lodge: I'm a man,I can
change,If i have
 to,I 
 quess.vbg


 Dave   

Hi,
  
  The PD7X is screenless, but I wonder if a screen is really needed.  It
adds
  size, weight, cost, drains batteries faster.  Are we that unsure of the
  technology involved in xferring a file from one storage medium to
another?
  
  Shel 
  
  
   [Original Message]
   From: Dave Brooks
  
   Besides it has the screen for checking to see if my
   pics made the transfer.   lol
   The PD7X is screenless, is it not.
  
  

   





Re: storing photos in the field: OTG device

2005-03-23 Thread Rob Studdert
On 23 Mar 2005 at 14:52, Frantisek wrote:

 I am not that sure how OTG works with ordinary mass storage devices,
 but apparently ( http://www.printerboyweb.net/pro_stuff/LOOK/index.php
 - review of one such device) you can attach an USB card reader to it
 and it will work. It is also supposed to work with most cameras,
 although that seems reduntant to me if I can use a small reader - most
 cameras have slow reading of CF cards and a lot still have USB 1.1,
 while I could attach a fast reader to the for example e-look device.

Interesting.

 I just need some good storage now, and then shell out the bucks for a
 full featured device much later...

I'd recommend the PDX7 then, it's cheap, small, fast, has good battery life, 
doubles as a AA charger, can handle a 100GB drive and verifies transfers.


Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998



Re: storing photos in the field: OTG device

2005-03-23 Thread Rob Studdert
On 23 Mar 2005 at 16:32, Village Idiot wrote:

 Speaking of CompactDrive PD7X, I thought this was interesting:
 
 http://www.compactdrive.us/

This is also worth a read:

http://www.3hdigital.com/


Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998



Re: storing photos in the field: OTG device

2005-03-23 Thread Quasi Modo
Ouch.   That is a very bizarre little episode in distribution politics
or are taking route 1 to get customers interested in a new product.


On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:45:10 +1000, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 23 Mar 2005 at 16:32, Village Idiot wrote:
 
  Speaking of CompactDrive PD7X, I thought this was interesting:
  
  http://www.compactdrive.us/
 
 This is also worth a read:
 
 http://www.3hdigital.com/
 
 
 Rob Studdert
 HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
 Tel +61-2-9554-4110
 UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
 Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
 




Re: storing photos in the field: OTG device

2005-03-23 Thread Frantisek
Ahoj Peter,

thanks for the comments - good luck in Egypt, and please keep us
posted with photos from the trip and also field notes with the Steno -
that should be a good test of how it performs, your Egypt trip ;-)


Good light!
   fra