Re: CSOT:CORRECTION... ECONOMICAL VARIATION FOR LLLT RESEARCHES
I BELIEVE THEY WERE LASER DIODES. YOU MAY CONTACT THE AUTHOR THROUGH THE SILVER LIST... I SENT ALL INFORMATION TO DO FURTHER INVETIAGATIONS... GOOD HUNTING. realw...@webtv.net RealWort's Instant Messenger ---BeginMessage--- Sir, I am both intrigued and curious about the cost-effective LLLT device described, comprising of 5 laser pointers. Please elighten me whether the 5 laser pointers incorporate the use of Light-Emitting Diodes [LED]. Light rays from light-emitting diodes are not collimated and are also incoherent. Thanks. With regards Lew BROOKS BRADLEY wrote: My attention has just been called to a transmission error in my earlier post. The pointer arrangement should resemble the dots on the face of dicefor the number five. My email program shifted the dots. My apologies. Brooks Bradley. To all interested list members. Since I am, already, at my computer to comment on a post by James Holmes, I will take the occasion to relate an item which may be of some interest. The college-age son of one of our staff researchers came up with an effective---if not cosmetically attractive---unit for use by persons with limiited funds and/or technical expertise. He constructed an effective Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) unit by combining five (5) laser pointers in a very simple arrangement. The pointers were purchased from the local Harbor Freight outlet, for a cost of $6.50 ea., plus tax. The configuration is as follows: (1) the physical arrangement provides for the natural arrangement for five similar bodies in an idealized space utilizing configuration. e.g._ _ _ _ _ (2) the operating switches (momentary, normally-open) require some form of constant-pressure to stay activated. This is addressed by using several twists from a rubber band which contacts all of the four outside switches, simultaneously. (3) the center pointer's on/off switch must be taped down prior to arrranging the four outer units. (4) arrange the four outer units in such a manner as to have their ON/OFF switch on a line directly toward the center of the assembly (this provides the maximum contact with the restraining rubber band. (5) assemble the pointers in a manner which causes the lower, sloping sections to be parallel to each other. This furnishes the closest allowable focus of the beams. (6) using tape, or preferably, a properly-sized rubber band, restrain them in the desired configuration. (7) next, apply the rubber band you have chosen to close the Power Switches of the four outside pointers. Some of you more adept-types may chose to use the same rubber band to both hold the assembly togetherand to operate the power switches, of the outside pointers. Since the four outside pointers will be in a divergent configuration toward the top of the assembly, some may desire to mechanically stabilize it. This may be done through using short lengths of popcicle sticks, thin styrofoam inserts, etc., plus a weak rubber band around the top of the assembly. Although this explanation may be overly cumbersome, the unit itself, is exceptionally simple to assemble.and to use. The power is low enough that the bulbs may be placed in direct contact with the outer skin (at least this has been our experience), We have employed this unit for continuous periods up to 15 minutes in a single location, without any, detectable, adverse reactions beyond slight skin reddening. We have found this low-power unit to be quite effective for applications within its power range. The chief advantage of the LLLT over the LED units is that of penetrating power of the coherent light beam. We have found no advantage for LLLT in conditions involving superficial (outer cutaneous) insults- among the experimental populations. Sincerely, Brooks Bradley.. P.S. Please do remember NEVER POINT ANY LASER DIRECTLY INTO ANYONE'S EYE/EYES To do so can cause PERMANENT/IRREPARABLE damage to the centra fovea.plus other retinal damage. -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com ---End Message---
Re: CSOT:CORRECTION... ECONOMICAL VARIATION FOR LLLT RESEARCHES
Sir, I am both intrigued and curious about the cost-effective LLLT device described, comprising of 5 laser pointers. Please elighten me whether the 5 laser pointers incorporate the use of Light-Emitting Diodes [LED]. Light rays from light-emitting diodes are not collimated and are also incoherent. Thanks. With regards Lew BROOKS BRADLEY wrote: My attention has just been called to a transmission error in my earlier post. The pointer arrangement should resemble the dots on the face of dicefor the number five. My email program shifted the dots. My apologies. Brooks Bradley. To all interested list members. Since I am, already, at my computer to comment on a post by James Holmes, I will take the occasion to relate an item which may be of some interest. The college-age son of one of our staff researchers came up with an effective---if not cosmetically attractive---unit for use by persons with limiited funds and/or technical expertise. He constructed an effective Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) unit by combining five (5) laser pointers in a very simple arrangement. The pointers were purchased from the local Harbor Freight outlet, for a cost of $6.50 ea., plus tax. The configuration is as follows: (1) the physical arrangement provides for the natural arrangement for five similar bodies in an idealized space utilizing configuration. e.g._ _ _ _ _ (2) the operating switches (momentary, normally-open) require some form of constant-pressure to stay activated. This is addressed by using several twists from a rubber band which contacts all of the four outside switches, simultaneously. (3) the center pointer's on/off switch must be taped down prior to arrranging the four outer units. (4) arrange the four outer units in such a manner as to have their ON/OFF switch on a line directly toward the center of the assembly (this provides the maximum contact with the restraining rubber band. (5) assemble the pointers in a manner which causes the lower, sloping sections to be parallel to each other. This furnishes the closest allowable focus of the beams. (6) using tape, or preferably, a properly-sized rubber band, restrain them in the desired configuration. (7) next, apply the rubber band you have chosen to close the Power Switches of the four outside pointers. Some of you more adept-types may chose to use the same rubber band to both hold the assembly togetherand to operate the power switches, of the outside pointers. Since the four outside pointers will be in a divergent configuration toward the top of the assembly, some may desire to mechanically stabilize it. This may be done through using short lengths of popcicle sticks, thin styrofoam inserts, etc., plus a weak rubber band around the top of the assembly. Although this explanation may be overly cumbersome, the unit itself, is exceptionally simple to assemble.and to use. The power is low enough that the bulbs may be placed in direct contact with the outer skin (at least this has been our experience), We have employed this unit for continuous periods up to 15 minutes in a single location, without any, detectable, adverse reactions beyond slight skin reddening. We have found this low-power unit to be quite effective for applications within its power range. The chief advantage of the LLLT over the LED units is that of penetrating power of the coherent light beam. We have found no advantage for LLLT in conditions involving superficial (outer cutaneous) insults- among the experimental populations. Sincerely, Brooks Bradley.. P.S. Please do remember NEVER POINT ANY LASER DIRECTLY INTO ANYONE'S EYE/EYES To do so can cause PERMANENT/IRREPARABLE damage to the centra fovea.plus other retinal damage. -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
Re: CS(OT) HUlda Clark On PBS
uhh can you please decode those airdates for me please =] -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
Re: CSOT:CORRECTION... ECONOMICAL VARIATION FOR LLLT RESEARCHES
I BELIEVE THEY WERE LASER DIODES. YOU MAY CONTACT THE AUTHOR THROUGH THE SILVER LIST... I SENT ALL INFORMATION TO DO FURTHER INVETIAGATIONS... GOOD HUNTING. You don`t need to shout...
CSMild Rant
Samantha, you sound just like me, and I could'nt have said it better. The world is so full of brain dead, mindless sheep you wonder how they make it through the day, much less survive to an age above 16. These are the airheads that not only kill millions with drugs and unnecessary surgery, ignore safe alternative methods of healing andpreventing disease but are probably responsible for putting the biggest airhead of all in the whitehouse. They all should be shipped to the funny farm and let them destroy each other, but since that won't happen let's be grateful for the time we have left before they send us there. In the meantime don't try to teach the unteachable, they are happy in their ignorance and are good at making us feel like we are way out there. Who needs the hassle? Yours in health happiness, Nancy -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
Re: CSOT:CORRECTION... ECONOMICAL VARIATION FOR LLLT RESEARCHES
i am new to this list and I do need to shout as I CAN'T SEE ON MY 9 INCH SCREEN SO I APOLOGIZE MY EYE SIGHT IS POOR BUT I MUST HAVE LARGE PRINT... THANKS FOR UNDERSTANDNG... BTW THAT THAT POST WAS AN ERRONIOUS ONE. I POSTED IT ON THE LASER LIST AND RESPONDED WITHOUT CONFIRMING THA IT WAS TO THAT LIST FRST WHICH IT WASN'T AND SO MY RESPONSE WAS INAPPRPRIATE ANYWAS SINCE IT WAS NOT MY POST AS I FORWARDED IT ETC... SORRY FOLKS... laserthe...@listbot.com IS THE EMAIL ADDRESS TO THE LASER LIST. YOU CAN ASK THEM OR ME HOW TO SUBSCRIBE THERE. WAYNE I KEEP FORGETING TO WARN PEOPLE ABOUT MY 9 INCH TV POOR EYESIGHT. realw...@webtv.net RealWort's Instant Messenger
Re: CSMild Rant
Great post Nancy and Samantha; If there were not people like you and those on the list it would be mighty lonesome here. Thanks. Betty FT. Lauderdale -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
Re: CSMild Rant
MIke, You are a great list owner of a great list. If I haven't said it lately, then I'd like to say how much I enjoy the opportunity to learn from all the other great people here. Thanks Diane M. G. Devour wrote: Nancy wrote: are probably responsible for putting the biggest airhead of all in the whitehouse. Please do not venture into politics with argumentative comments like this on this list. Probably everything else you said was fine, but, to paraphrase, Clinton's an airhead and everybody who voted for him is an airhead, too goes too far! smile There are folks on the silver list of every possible political orientation, at least *some* of whom would be offended by this remark. We do *not* want to waste the time and energy of our group re-hashing personal politics, so restraint is required. And if you know me, you'll understand how *HARD* it is to have to say this!!! g Be well, Mike Devour silver list owner [Mike Devour, Citizen, Patriot, Libertarian] [mdev...@eskimo.com] [Speaking only for myself... ] -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
Re: CSPotato extract: A new direction for antibiotics
Cool!!! Sounds great!! Sparrow Using substances like PPO to treat infections could also help solve the growing problem of antibiotic resistance, says Cowan. The destruction of bacteria sensitive to antibiotics is a primary requisite for the rise of resistant mutants. Since these compounds don't kill the sensitive bacteria, they remain around to compete and crowd out any individual resistant bacteria that may develop. -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
CScurrent limiting
i find that its necessary to throw myself to te mercy of you smarter and more experienced guys (or gals). a bit back i built my first generator, and recieved encouragement from a couple of the group. now, with my daily perusal of the list, i feel i need to change it to make better CS. i'm using a plug-in-the-wall type of adapter that says it has an output of 12 volts, and 750 ma. i've measured the output at 17.5 volts, and have no clue as to the current. my CS is turning golden within 1 1/2 to 2 hours. i'm using 2 ten inch lengths of 14 gauge .999, bent into loops. i use distilled water, no starter salt or anything. do you all have some wisdom for me? should i leave my setup alone,or do some current limiting,(if so, how?) i'd be grateful and pleased if you'd take the time to let me share your knowledge(s), on the list or at my e-mail. respectfully, Frank Gibson http://community.webtv.net/FlyingFawcett/ -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
Re: CScurrent limiting
Hi Frank, My protocol for making clear CS with a weak T.E. (that is the best) is to use #14 Ag electrodes spaced 1/2 with 3-1/2 of wet length, and 26 vDC. I measure the current on every run. If you don't measure current you have no idea as to what you are making. In about two hours my currents run 4 to 5 ma. and the ppm as measured with a spectrophotometer is 11 to 12 ppm. To consistently make clear CS you MUST add constant stirring. I use a RAdio shack 1-1/2V dc motor with a 2 length of plastic insulation for a #14 copper house wire. I add about 3 ohms in series with the motor to slow it down. Otherwise it stirs up a storm. This protocol is for 14 oz of DW. in a 16 oz clear plastic SOLO cup ( a grocery store item). It will even make clear CS using the demineralized drinking water. The only problem with it is the very bright T.E. If you need more help then post me direct. Yellow CS generally says that you are brewing for too long of a time. Ole Bob -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
Re: CSPotato extract: A new direction for antibiotics
That is Cool... But I wonder how effective it is against Lyme Disease. That is one Tough Bug!!! Rob From: Scharbach myf...@mwt.net Reply-To: silver-list@eskimo.com To: George Martin gmar...@dragonbyte.net, sIlver-list@eskimo.com Subject: Re: CSPotato extract: A new direction for antibiotics Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 10:21:40 -0700 Cool!!! Sounds great!! Sparrow Using substances like PPO to treat infections could also help solve the growing problem of antibiotic resistance, says Cowan. The destruction of bacteria sensitive to antibiotics is a primary requisite for the rise of resistant mutants. Since these compounds don't kill the sensitive bacteria, they remain around to compete and crowd out any individual resistant bacteria that may develop. -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
CSA manager responds to the airline mechanic's message on chemical spraying
http://www.carnicom.com/mgr1.htm Marshall -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
Re: CSOT:CORRECTION... ECONOMICAL VARIATION FOR LLLT RESEARCHES
Dear F.H. Lew. The device I described has nothing to do with LED's. The comment relating to LEDs was simply directed toward distinguishing one of the differences between the effects of LLLTs and LED assemblies. I apologize if my syntax was so constructed as to mislead you. I did not intend to suggest that LEDs generated a coherent beam. I will try to be more explicit in future postings. Sincerely, Brooks Bradley. FHLew wrote: Sir, I am both intrigued and curious about the cost-effective LLLT device described, comprising of 5 laser pointers. Please elighten me whether the 5 laser pointers incorporate the use of Light-Emitting Diodes [LED]. Light rays from light-emitting diodes are not collimated and are also incoherent. Thanks. With regards Lew BROOKS BRADLEY wrote: My attention has just been called to a transmission error in my earlier post. The pointer arrangement should resemble the dots on the face of dicefor the number five. My email program shifted the dots. My apologies. Brooks Bradley. To all interested list members. Since I am, already, at my computer to comment on a post by James Holmes, I will take the occasion to relate an item which may be of some interest. The college-age son of one of our staff researchers came up with an effective---if not cosmetically attractive---unit for use by persons with limiited funds and/or technical expertise. He constructed an effective Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) unit by combining five (5) laser pointers in a very simple arrangement. The pointers were purchased from the local Harbor Freight outlet, for a cost of $6.50 ea., plus tax. The configuration is as follows: (1) the physical arrangement provides for the natural arrangement for five similar bodies in an idealized space utilizing configuration. e.g._ _ _ _ _ (2) the operating switches (momentary, normally-open) require some form of constant-pressure to stay activated. This is addressed by using several twists from a rubber band which contacts all of the four outside switches, simultaneously. (3) the center pointer's on/off switch must be taped down prior to arrranging the four outer units. (4) arrange the four outer units in such a manner as to have their ON/OFF switch on a line directly toward the center of the assembly (this provides the maximum contact with the restraining rubber band. (5) assemble the pointers in a manner which causes the lower, sloping sections to be parallel to each other. This furnishes the closest allowable focus of the beams. (6) using tape, or preferably, a properly-sized rubber band, restrain them in the desired configuration. (7) next, apply the rubber band you have chosen to close the Power Switches of the four outside pointers. Some of you more adept-types may chose to use the same rubber band to both hold the assembly togetherand to operate the power switches, of the outside pointers. Since the four outside pointers will be in a divergent configuration toward the top of the assembly, some may desire to mechanically stabilize it. This may be done through using short lengths of popcicle sticks, thin styrofoam inserts, etc., plus a weak rubber band around the top of the assembly. Although this explanation may be overly cumbersome, the unit itself, is exceptionally simple to assemble.and to use. The power is low enough that the bulbs may be placed in direct contact with the outer skin (at least this has been our experience), We have employed this unit for continuous periods up to 15 minutes in a single location, without any, detectable, adverse reactions beyond slight skin reddening. We have found this low-power unit to be quite effective for applications within its power range. The chief advantage of the LLLT over the LED units is that of penetrating power of the coherent light beam. We have found no advantage for LLLT in conditions involving superficial (outer cutaneous) insults- among the experimental populations. Sincerely, Brooks Bradley.. P.S. Please do remember NEVER POINT ANY LASER DIRECTLY INTO ANYONE'S EYE/EYES To do so can cause PERMANENT/IRREPARABLE damage to the centra fovea.plus other retinal damage. -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To
Re: CSMild Rant
Nancy wrote: are probably responsible for putting the biggest airhead of all in the whitehouse. Please do not venture into politics with argumentative comments like this on this list. Probably everything else you said was fine, but, to paraphrase, Clinton's an airhead and everybody who voted for him is an airhead, too goes too far! smile There are folks on the silver list of every possible political orientation, at least *some* of whom would be offended by this remark. We do *not* want to waste the time and energy of our group re-hashing personal politics, so restraint is required. And if you know me, you'll understand how *HARD* it is to have to say this!!! g Be well, Mike Devour silver list owner [Mike Devour, Citizen, Patriot, Libertarian] [mdev...@eskimo.com] [Speaking only for myself... ] -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
Re: CSOT:CORRECTION... ECONOMICAL VARIATION FOR LLLT RESEARCHES
Hello James, My apologies for this tardy response, but you are aware of my time-based pressures. They are obscene for one of my years. I have chosen to answer you with a copy to the list..as some others may have an interest also. First, let me clarify that we have conducted no formal studies ourselves. However, we have conducted several anecdotal-type evaluations,,especially on horses. The laser pointers we have used are 5 MW in power. Our laboratory instruments are HeNe type, and are 10 mw and 25 mw respectively. We have several LED arrays. Some are 13, some 25, and some 50 elements in size. Do be advised, I AM NOT a pundit in matters relating to either LEDT or LLLT. This being the case, do understand I have no positionor verifiable proof.that one methodology is superior to the other. People seem to become somewhat polarized on the merits of oneor the other, as being superior. Useful studies are not very numerous, but I will list several we found of pertinence, both for comparing the effectivity of LEDs versus LLLTs..and for the general information furnished: 1. Gupta, et al. Journal of Dermatological Treatment (1997) This study relates to the use of non-coherent light (LEDs) for addressing damage on superficial structures (e.g. skin, epithelial tissues and very shallow muscle tissue insults). The results, using 660 nm incoherent light, were very positive on slow-healing wounds. 2. Several studies, of which I do not have access here at home, have been conducted which seem to confirm that LLLT is markely superior to LEDT for relieving chronic, deep-seated, pain through raising the ACTH and endorphin levels-where LEDT gives little.or no response. 3. Some researchers have reported positive results using a combination of LLLT and LEDT. e.g. Laser Therapy, 1998, Vol. 10, No.3. For pain and wound healing. 4. LLLT arrays have demonstrated their superiority in addressing severe, non-healing ulcers, among diabetics. Journal of British Podiatric Medicine, 1991, Oct.., 186-189. 5. Another study of possible consequence is: Jilliane James. Primary Care. Care Vol. 410. 1997; pages 18-20. Topic. Use of Laser Therapy on Non-healing Wounds. 6. The most pronounced claim, to date, favoring LLLT over LEDT seems to be that made by Tina Karu (1998: The Science of Low-Power Laser Therapy), wherein she states, the coherence of light is of no importance in low-power laser clinical effects and the primary difference between lasers and LEDs is that the lasers coherent beam produces speckles of relatively high power density which can cause local heating of inhomogeneous tissues. I have a couple more general comments, before I end this extended epistle. The general view among our more knowledgeable staff is that LED arrays are very effective for open wounds and large-area amorphous swellings (e.g. impact trauma, near-surface hematomas). Additionally, LEDs give measureable relief in cases of tightened lean-muscle tissues. These conditions prevail for large domestic mammals (e.g. horses and cows), as well as human volunteers. Although large LED arrays (100 bulbs) will trigger IR detectors on the opposite side of the human hand.demonstrating considerable power of penetrationthey do not seem to yield the degree of pain- relief or the rapid, beneficial, deep-tissue and nerve response modifications-as do 10 mw, and greater, LLLT devices. I hope these observations are of value to you. Sincerely, Brooks. James Osbourne, Holmes wrote: Hi Brooks, Thanks for another great homemade therapy device. Do you have handy references for the types of conditions and protocols with which this device has been demonstrated to be effective? -Original Message- From: BROOKS BRADLEY liat...@flash.net To: silver-list@eskimo.com silver-list@eskimo.com Date: Monday, May 22, 2000 12:48 PM Subject: CSOT:CORRECTION... ECONOMICAL VARIATION FOR LLLT RESEARCHES My attention has just been called to a transmission error in my earlier post. The pointer arrangement should resemble the dots on the face of dicefor the number five. My email program shifted the dots. My apologies. Brooks Bradley. To all interested list members. Since I am, already, at my computer to comment on a post by James Holmes, I will take the occasion to relate an item which may be of some interest. The college-age son of one of our staff researchers came up with an effective---if not cosmetically attractive---unit for use by persons with limiited funds and/or technical expertise. He constructed an effective Low
CSOT: Single-Element Laser-Pointer Uses
To all interested List Members. I received an off-list inquiry asking about possible uses of a single Laser Pointer. There are some very useful applications for a single, 5 mw pointer. While all of our evidence is anecdotal, it isnonetheless, interesting. We have found, in an experimental setting, that several, primarily minor, conditions respond quite well to a single-unit protocol. The most impressive results were achieved among a small group of older Type II diabetics (both insulin and non-insulin dependent) who were experiencing difficulty in getting small cuts/lacerations (especially on the lower extremities) to initiate proper graunlationthus remaining in a state of constant ulceration. We had, previously, been able to successfully address these using colloidal silver dressings; but the initial granulations were slow to manifest. We discovered that the use of a single laser pointer greatly accelerated the initial granulation process of these wounds. The protocol which seemed most satisfactory involved nothing more than applying the pointer-beam about .5 to .75 above the wound, and slowly moving the beam in a manner covering the entire length and width of the woundfor period covering 5 to 10 minutes (3 times daily). Wounds larger than .5 X 1 required so much more time that it became impractical to use a single element. However, in those cases of wounds .5 X .75 and smaller, the response was excellent...for the exposure time stated above. Other conditions which responded well to a single laser pointer were moles/warts.and some age spots. An interesting side-note is that, in most all cases involving associated, localized, pain; the laser-beam gave immediate, and pronounced, relief. I hope this information is of some value to you. Sincerely, Brooks Bradley. p.s. I almost forgot; we achieved excellent success in spot-treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. The protocol involved placing the pointer as close to the skin-surface as possible (even touching the surface is fine) and maintaining the alignment for 5 minutesfor each distinct area of pain/discomfort. We achieved total remission, in some cases, within 2 to 3 days. 100 milligrams (daily) of B-6 has shown to be an excellent ancillary protocol for this condition; at least among our experimental/volunteer population. -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
Re: CSOT: Single-Element Laser-Pointer Uses
Thank you Brooks, For those who wish to pursue Low Level Laser and Light Emitting Diode Therapy, you may be interested in a few links. Our very own David Jeffers has designed a quite sophisticated LEDT device, the design of which started out in the public domain (much like the other designs he generously offers us), but I guess he has seen error in his ways, and is now looking for distributors. Never the less there are some very good links on the LED page. Keep in mind the distinction between LEDS and Lasers, the discussion link is interesting in this regard (hello Lew!). http://www.cicbs.com/rife/led.html It was this link that sparked my interest in light therapy, although the light wand in use here is different to LED or Laser light. http://www.arthritistrust.org/lymphati.htm The Light Beam Generators as mentioned above can be found in the next two links, the others are variations on the theme. http://www.medicineelectric.com http://www.arcturusstar.com/ProdSum.htm http://www.jcau.com/energymedicine/ultra_photon_sound_beam_vii.htm http://www.holistic-alt.com/ProdSum.htm This is a good link that details the action of light on and in the cells. http://www.komvet.at/english/SNLaser/basics.htm Enjoy Ivan. - Original Message - From: BROOKS BRADLEY liat...@flash.net To: silver-list@eskimo.com Sent: Wednesday, 24 May 2000 14:46 Subject: CSOT: Single-Element Laser-Pointer Uses To all interested List Members. I received an off-list inquiry asking about possible uses of a single Laser Pointer. There are some very useful applications for a single, 5 mw pointer. While all of our evidence is anecdotal, it isnonetheless, interesting. We have found, in an experimental setting, that several, primarily minor, conditions respond quite well to a single-unit protocol. The most impressive results were achieved among a small group of older Type II diabetics (both insulin and non-insulin dependent) who were experiencing difficulty in getting small cuts/lacerations (especially on the lower extremities) to initiate proper graunlationthus remaining in a state of constant ulceration. We had, previously, been able to successfully address these using colloidal silver dressings; but the initial granulations were slow to manifest. We discovered that the use of a single laser pointer greatly accelerated the initial granulation process of these wounds. The protocol which seemed most satisfactory involved nothing more than applying the pointer-beam about .5 to .75 above the wound, and slowly moving the beam in a manner covering the entire length and width of the woundfor period covering 5 to 10 minutes (3 times daily). Wounds larger than .5 X 1 required so much more time that it became impractical to use a single element. However, in those cases of wounds .5 X .75 and smaller, the response was excellent...for the exposure time stated above. Other conditions which responded well to a single laser pointer were moles/warts.and some age spots. An interesting side-note is that, in most all cases involving associated, localized, pain; the laser-beam gave immediate, and pronounced, relief. I hope this information is of some value to you. Sincerely, Brooks Bradley. p.s. I almost forgot; we achieved excellent success in spot-treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. The protocol involved placing the pointer as close to the skin-surface as possible (even touching the surface is fine) and maintaining the alignment for 5 minutesfor each distinct area of pain/discomfort. We achieved total remission, in some cases, within 2 to 3 days. 100 milligrams (daily) of B-6 has shown to be an excellent ancillary protocol for this condition; at least among our experimental/volunteer population. -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
Re: CSMild Rant
airhead is way too kind. The asshole is a CRIMINAL. If you want a long healthy free life, use c/s and vote conservative(smile) Ron There are folks on the silver list of every possible political orientation, at least *some* of whom would be offended by this remark. We do *not* want to waste the time and energy of our group re-hashing personal politics, so restraint is required. And if you know me, you'll understand how *HARD* it is to have to say this!!! g Be well, Mike Devour silver list owner [Mike Devour, Citizen, Patriot, Libertarian] [mdev...@eskimo.com] [Speaking only for myself... ] -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
Re: CSWhat is best constant current?
I WAS TOLD BY AN ACUPUNCTURIST FRIEND THAT THE FDA SAYS 400 MICROGRAMS IS A DAILY DOSE. IS THAT TRUE? SORRY FOR THE CAPS...MY TV IS ONLY 9 INCHES SMALL WAYNE realw...@webtv.net RealWort's Instant Messenger
