Re: newsreader
Friday, June 21, 2002, 9:02:25 AM, Nick Andriash wrote: > Agent supports scoring now? That is news to me, as it sure didn't > last time I used it, which is why I 'upgraded' to XNews. ;o) What is scoring? I've been reading Usenet for years and have never heard the term. -- Zach Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: Questions
El viernes 21 de junio de 2002, 22.17, Thomas F decía: TF> And why would Windows care about the actual definition? MS could just TF> have redefined it... ;-) actually they don't 'redefine', they 'extend' and 'improve', always in the name of 'innovation' -- Ricardo M. Reyes | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (Mar del Plata - Argentina) | Usando The Bat! 1.60c Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: newsreader
Hello Nick, Friday, June 21, 2002, 11:02:25 AM, you wrote: NA> Agent supports scoring now? That is news to me, as it sure didn't NA> last time I used it, which is why I 'upgraded' to XNews. ;o) The interesting thought on this discussion and similar ones in the past is whether TB! will incorporate more news reader functionality into future releases. I've heard this may be the case, but I guess we will all have to wait and see. -- Best regards, Greg Strong TB! v1.60q on Windows 98 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: newsreader
Hello Jonathan, Friday, June 21, 2002, 9:21:39 AM, you wrote: JA> There are so many useful features in Agent, it makes it difficult to JA> learn them all. The speed kill files are really useful, along with JA> proper support for scoring, and a nice filtering setup. I saw Nick's reply on scoring. I agree with him. I know of no such feature unless you mean "Priority" for filters. -- Best regards, Greg Strong TB! v1.60q on Windows 98 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: First post is a "Thank You!"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nick, Friday, June 21, 2002, 10:41:48 PM, you wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: NA> In Reference to your Posting on Friday, June 21 2002 at 05:24 PM PDT, >> My apologies. With help from Melissa I nailed the problem with my >> installation of PGP 7.0.3. My bad. That has now been fixed. I hope >> Please send a new Key request. NA> Ok, I was able to verify the message I am replying to which you signed NA> with Key ID 0x26C51F27, but I still cannot verify the first few messages you NA> posted in this thread. Apparently you used Key ID 0x563FD539 which you NA> have not made available: My earlier messages were attempts to use my PGP 7.0.3 with TB! and it could not be made to work. I changed PGP versions to PGP 6x and things began working. The earlier key was destroyed with the un-install of PGP 7 so please disregard that one and forgive my bumpy start. I still have some things to tweak, and my key request is not yet automatic. For now, I'm giving up on today with thanks to all. - -- Best! Mike MUA = TB! v1.60q (www.RitLabs.com/the_bat) Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2) PGP Key mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=Key_Request -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/ Comment: KeyID: 0x26C51F27 Comment: Fingerprint: 62E1 E4F5 80C8 6825 8DC4 8C1D A402 E6B0 26C5 1F27 iQA/AwUBPRPosaQC5rAmxR8nEQKAigCfcIT+qNugxaTMutzH6OKFx+yXDngAoI2I xgwMmIWr86vQh2VNjwyTf3ok =8oq6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: First post is a "Thank You!"
Hello Mike Apsey, In Reference to your Posting on Friday, June 21 2002 at 05:24 PM PDT, > My apologies. With help from Melissa I nailed the problem with my > installation of PGP 7.0.3. My bad. That has now been fixed. I hope > Please send a new Key request. Ok, I was able to verify the message I am replying to which you signed with Key ID 0x26C51F27, but I still cannot verify the first few messages you posted in this thread. Apparently you used Key ID 0x563FD539 which you have not made available: gpg: Signature made 06/21/02 09:55:57 PDT using RSA key ID 563FD539 gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found. gpg: Total number processed: 0 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found -- Nick Andriash Courtenay, B.C. Canada Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: How do make the bat show in system tray at startup
Hello vj135doppa, On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 18:01:47 -0500 GMT (22/06/02, 06:01 +0700 GMT), vj135doppa wrote: v> I have this utiltiy called "startup manager". I use the same - but I think the only interface available is in German, isn't it? ;-) v> does anyone know how i should proceed so the bat just shows in the v> system tray and does not execute when my comp boots.I am using win 98. Use TB's /minimize switch. Help / Topics / Index / Command Line Parameters / Miscellaneous. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. On the other hand, you have different fingers. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60q under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Questions
Hello Mark, On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 17:12:42 -0700 GMT (22/06/02, 07:12 +0700 GMT), Mark Wieder wrote: MW> Random House American College Dictionary And why would Windows care about the actual definition? MS could just have redefined it... ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. When you smell an odorless gas, it is probably carbon monoxide. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60q under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: How do make the bat show in system tray at startup
On Friday, June 21, 2002 at 18:01:47 GMT -0500 (which was 6:01 PM where I live), thus spake vj135doppa on the subject of "How do make the bat show in system tray at startup": v> hi, v> I have this utiltiy called "startup manager".I just dropped the bat v> icon into it.But instead of just showing in the system tray at startup v> it starts to open the bat.Must have been the executable that i must v> have dropped. v> does anyone know how i should proceed so the bat just shows in the v> system tray and does not execute when my comp boots.I am using win 98. v> thanks >From the main The Bat! screen, you should be able to go into: Options-> Preferences and select the check-boxes that say "Always show in system tray" and the one below it, "Only show in system tray" or something like that. It works both on Win 2000 and Win 98. You can also set it to minimize to system tray. -- Best regards, Geordonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your fortune: "Hegel was right when he said that we learn from history that man can never learn anything from history." (George Bernard Shaw) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
How do make the bat show in system tray at startup
hi, I have this utiltiy called "startup manager".I just dropped the bat icon into it.But instead of just showing in the system tray at startup it starts to open the bat.Must have been the executable that i must have dropped. does anyone know how i should proceed so the bat just shows in the system tray and does not execute when my comp boots.I am using win 98. thanks Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: First post is a "Thank You!"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nick, Friday, June 21, 2002, 7:58:46 PM, you wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: NA> Well, the Key I received is still wrong... it cannot verify your NA> signature: Key ID 0x26C51F27 is the one you sent me, while NA> 0x4EBD8098 is the one you sent Melissa. Appears as if you have 3 NA> different Keys. My apologies. With help from Melissa I nailed the problem with my installation of PGP 7.0.3. My bad. That has now been fixed. I hope Please send a new Key request. My key requests aren't quite automated yet, but I'm close. Thank you for commenting. I still have some work to do and at the moment, I have guests, so it may be a bit. - -- Best! Mike MUA = TB! v1.60q (www.RitLabs.com/the_bat) Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2) PGP Key mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=Key_Request -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/ iQA/AwUBPRPD2KQC5rAmxR8nEQI0EQCglLKyFeio6jytPzTp7wapTyUs12EAmQFt ZkZu0CzJYC0LhQfQMW04gDi0 =l5GY -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Could you help me to understand !
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Claude, @21 June 2002, 21:48:23 +0200 (20:48 UK time) Claude Renaud wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I send you back two messages as attachments which are my message and the > technician's answer, could you > scan them and tell me what is wrong and what I have to do to solve this > problem please ? Nothing is wrong with your message other than that it is PGP signed. Perhaps he is using a client that does something "automatic" with PGP signed messages. Other than that, I suggest you try writing again without signing or MIME forward the original message telling him to look more closely at the message source and that the problem is at his end not yours and that you can recommend a very good email client ;-). - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9E8J7OeQkq5KdzaARArbGAKC/B4U8rkyh0Mtr++C+Hve7P160jACfV6Q9 YnPCz0YdNNNsrmu5pBoVAUg= =3qk2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: Questions
Bats- DG> only if the computer has been idle for three minutes. Now let's see how DG> Windows defines 'idle' i-dle, adj., idler, idlest, v. idled, idling --adj. 1. unemployed, or doing nothing 2. unoccupied 3. not kept busy or in use or operation 4. habitually doing nothing or avoiding work 5. of no real worth, importance, or significance 6. baseless or groundless 7. frivolous or vain 8. futile 9. useless Syn. indolent, lazy, slothful Random House American College Dictionary -Mark (Yep, that's my OS) Wieder Using The Bat! v1.60h on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: First post is a "Thank You!"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mike, @21 June 2002, 15:10:08 -0400 (20:10 UK time) Mike Apsey wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Ho boy! Bear with me folks. Sorry for the traffic. No problem - that's what the list is here for - sorting out TB usage and teething troubles. There is a PGP-Basic list on yahoogroups if you want to get deeper into that aspect of things. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9E76POeQkq5KdzaARAqJUAKD9S7C5CcsAIayUtI0EtIBelLtsowCeO3hw 5SMK/i9Y6tqhxiFKCwGiL5o= =Nh8T -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: First post is a "Thank You!"
Hello Mike Apsey, In Reference to your Posting on Friday, June 21 2002 at 12:10 PM PDT, > Actually oops2. Not the last one above, but the last one I sent. The > first one (0x563FD539)is correct--for the record. I think. :-( Well, the Key I received is still wrong... it cannot verify your signature: Key ID 0x26C51F27 is the one you sent me, while 0x4EBD8098 is the one you sent Melissa. Appears as if you have 3 different Keys. gpg: Signature made 06/21/02 12:09:54 PDT using RSA key ID 563FD539 gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found. gpg: Total number processed: 0 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found -- Nick Andriash Courtenay, B.C. Canada Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[4]: newsreader
On Friday, June 21, 2002, Deborah W wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: DW> I found a website which had a pretty good Gravity reference section a DW> while back; if you'd like, I can dig it out. Deborah, Thanks for the offer. I think I'll stick with Xnews for now. -- JN Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: [regex-tutorial]: Part 4
Hello Januk Aggarwal ! On Wed, 19 Jun 2002 22:12:52 -0700 GMT your local time, which was 20.06.2002, 07:12 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote: > Cool, I just tested this and TB seems to finally support back > references. This should make accurate regexps a little easier. I > wonder when this was fixed? Hmmm, don't ask me, but when I wrote the German version in March it already worked fine. -- Best regards, Gerd === Tutorial "PGP and TB!" and "How to Use Regular Expressions in TB!" at www.pro-privacy.de --- Program: the conversion of input into error messages. --- now playing: WDR2 :-) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Questions
Spake Ricardo M. Reyes on 6/21/2002, at 15:57:52 -0300: ACM>> It's kind of cumbersome to be deleting the ini file all the time > you can use an scheduler (I'm sure there is one with every version of > windows, I don't remember it's name) to delete that file every 5 > minutes, for example. I've set my scheduler to (hopefully) delete the file every five minutes, but only if the computer has been idle for three minutes. Now let's see how Windows defines 'idle' Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: Edited Shortcut file to find
Hello Roelof, Thanks. I guess somehow I lost it during the transfer of the directory. I found the new one. Unfortunately I had to remake my custom keyboard short cuts. Friday, June 21, 2002, 4:08:19 AM, you wrote: RO> Hallo Peter, RO> On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 18:01:45 -0400GMT (21-6-02, 0:01 +0200GMT, where I RO> live), you wrote: PK>> I presume I have not moved the file which contains the shortcuts. PK>> Would appreciate any advise of which file contains them. RO> I suppose that would be shortcuts.cfg, the file can be found in the RO> directory that TB uses as default directory for new accounts. -- Best regards, Petermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[3]: newsreader
Hello Joseph, Friday, June 21, 2002, 11:56:53 AM, you wrote: JN>On Friday, June 21, 2002, Jonathan Angliss wrote in JN> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: JA>> There are so many useful features in Agent, it makes it difficult to JA>> learn them all. JN> Jonathan, JN> Is Agent good at offline reading, and can one compose messages offline JN> to be dispatched on next connection? Exactly this is the way it works. You can download first all new headers in a newsgroup, you can choose the articles you are interested, mark them and download on the next run. You can compose a new message or a reply and upload at that time. If there is a tread you are interested you can put a "watch" mark in which case it will download the full message not just the header right away. You can also build filters with certain key words in subject or author it will again download the full article immediately during the next connection. (You can also do the opposite for spams) -- Peter Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Could you help me to understand !
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi everybody, Recently I sent a request to a technical support writing a message with the bat as usual. But, the technician answer surprize me. He wrote back to me the following : "Your message with the above ID contained no recognizable text in its body which was effectively "empty". Please try again, making sure you are sending plain text, preferably us-ascii." I do not understand because I can read my message (I can't see any unrecognizable text) , my message is not empty and I use pain text. I even read my message and his answer with the "view source" function and I do not see anything wrong. I send you back two messages as attachments which are my message and the technician's answer, could you scan them and tell me what is wrong and what I have to do to solve this problem please ? - -- Greetings, Claude Renaud E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mailer The Bat! version 1.60q Serial number : C4C1C7D5 Windows XP Version : 5.1 Build 2600 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAj0TgwkACgkQwBUuKtaPTPXcaACfbEqFX8hULqrUlvLJw6whVOUv GW4An29kcQq3RcZDvnpCB+zf1bdP/RvW =093G -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Begin Message --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I would like to ask you few questions about 4NT 4.01A build 54 and Take command 32 3.01A build 54. I'm working with windows xp french version with all patches currently available. I noticed two stranges behaviours with 4NT that do not occur with take command 32. First, I noticed that with 4NT it is not possible to delete files that contain double extensions such as filename.exe.log for example whereas it is possible with take command. When I try to delete such a file, I have the error message "0 file deleted" whereas the file exists. Have you already noticed that and do you know a workaround ? It is strange because others manipulation such as renaming that kind of files work correctly. Secondly, I noticed that with 4nt, it is not possible to delete files contained in directory whose names contain accented characters. Below is a sample batch file witch works under take command (delete requested files) but fails under 4nt (saying that the specified path is not found and so 0 file is deleted). Here is my batch file : DeleteMessages : @echo off set tb=D:\Mes Documents\internet\Courrier électronique\Messagerie\Archives\The Bat!\ del /s "%tb%mon compte\inbox\*.tbb;*.tbi" del /s "%tb%msn hotmail\inbox\*.tbb;*.tbi" unset tb With take command all the .TBB and .TBI files are deleted hereas they are not when I run this batch file after having opened a console session with 4NT. - -- Greetings, Claude Renaud E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mailer The Bat! version 1.60q Serial number : C4C1C7D5 Windows XP Version : 5.1 Build 2600 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAj0SLGkACgkQwBUuKtaPTPVUrgCgqW6v5IfZ3XwEGP+zs1Hh0VqO bKcAniX5eBqRZZXRgLOS+RHv1G2HcrFV =yh7D -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- | Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 21:26:30 +0200 | Subject: Few questions about two of your products. | From: Claude Renaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Claude, Your message with the above ID contained no recognizable text in its body which was effectively "empty". Please try again, making sure you are sending plain text, preferably us-ascii. Note that questions and concerns dealing with Technical Support for JP Software products should be posted in our Support Forum where other users may be able to benefit from and participate in the exchange. Support via private email is typically restricted to those who have purchased an extended support plan. See the Support area of our Web pages at "http://jpsoft.com/"; for details on joining and using the support forum, and on our support policies. The Forum is accessible as a private newsgroup, an email list, or a web-based discussion area. You can choose the approach that works best for you. -- --- Mike BessyJP Software, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://jpsoft.com/ __ --- End Message ---
Re[2]: Questions
El jueves 20 de junio de 2002, 21.36, Allie C Martin decía: DG>> It's a pain to type in every time, but I'd like it to be forgotten DG>> if it isn't used for a period of time -- preferrably DG>> user-specified. ACM> It's kind of cumbersome to be deleting the ini file all the time you can use an scheduler (I'm sure there is one with every version of windows, I don't remember it's name) to delete that file every 5 minutes, for example. -- Ricardo M. Reyes | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (Mar del Plata - Argentina) | Usando The Bat! 1.60c This is a follow up to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
[OT] Donate free to the NSPCC!
Hi all, Go here and click to donate free to the NSPC http://www.nspcc.org.uk/donate-4-free/donate-upd.asp Regards, -- Ben Kennish [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: First post is a "Thank You!"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: MD5 Melissa, Friday, June 21, 2002, 2:40:22 PM, you wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: MR> 0x563FD539 MR> ...and the key I received from your key request was: MR> 0x4EBD8098 MR> oops? Actually oops2. Not the last one above, but the last one I sent. The first one (0x563FD539)is correct--for the record. I think. :-( Ho boy! Bear with me folks. Sorry for the traffic. - -- Best! Mike MUA = TB! v1.60q (www.RitLabs.com/the_bat) Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2) PGP Key mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=Key_Request "Old men enjoy giving advice when they are no longer capable of serving as a bad example." -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 2.6 iQCVAwUAPRN6Av4YPXhWP9U5AQF+zQP/WD9phLUPy/C6uNYMQ0X2ajpPMlEX969c e5i70fgs8/JpOVR34Kll1MNUXmzE3PKEoOopLMtmmI8YBOIVRt/JkJqMSeLj5Se0 EwGAVYm5HtB/qu4AIlmi6JYLu3YUREWsI3QlhyXTIrkI6BDdiuNHj/BH0dLcYhar bQtYJfB0Kx8= =V6eh -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: First post is a "Thank You!"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: MD5 Melissa, Friday, June 21, 2002, 2:40:22 PM, you wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: MR> The key you used to sign your message is: MR> 0x563FD539 MR> ...and the key I received from your key request was: MR> 0x4EBD8098 MR> oops? Yes, oops. Sorry. The last one is right. I'm not used to "Open PGP" and had done messed-up! I think all is well now. - -- Best! Mike MUA = TB! v1.60q (www.RitLabs.com/the_bat) Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2) PGP Key mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=Key_Request -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 2.6 iQCVAwUAPRN4hv4YPXhWP9U5AQF+IgP7BzRC45NGARcWol+60zmJXYKOHx6ULiwN VqzCILFZ+yd6GsuV3CXim8AH1gA7M5TWEGSw/gb/h8sOlKqTWK9O0NEqkiUwZQDq rfN9imM2pnaJQVde/ZO7+365w7CHrP0Tv6NhCq7mt0tBfAls2gamIh+CpFIqTzBr K0ue49gwk2k= =H8bf -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: First post is a "Thank You!"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, June 21, 2002, at 9:55:48 AM PST, Mike Apsey wrote: > PGP Key mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=key_request > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: 2.6 Hello Mike, This has really nothing to do with TB!, but since it's just one little thread, I hope I'll be forgiven for continuing OT here... While your key request seems to have worked, the key I received was not the one you used to sign your message with; hence I still cannot verify your signature. :-) The key you used to sign your message is: 0x563FD539 ...and the key I received from your key request was: 0x4EBD8098 oops? Melissa - -- PGP public keys: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=0xFB04F2E9&Body=Please%20send%20keys -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEARECAAYFAj0TcwkACgkQjVbXUvsE8umKDACg+QwtlzOiloGuuu59aje6M804 MRwAoNoeoVX0dLYGKQdNN4ugLkkY7Ea1 =tYR/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Filter question
Thursday, June 20, 2002, 8:19:11 AM, you wrote: JEB> Right now I have a "Selective Download" filter set up, where any JEB> messages containing particular header strings are deleted before JEB> downloading. The header strings are in a text file; I have put a JEB> shortcut on my desktop to this text file for easy addition. The JEB> problem is, since it's a "Selective Download" filter, The Bat! first JEB> has to run through all of my email headers on the POP3 server, and JEB> second has to download the messages it has chosen: almost twice as JEB> long, on my cable modem. Is there a way to do this kind of simple JEB> text-file search filtering without using a "Selective Download" JEB> filter? In short: I want to filter using a text file, but I want to do JEB> the filtering after the messages have been retrieved. Is there a way? Hi Jonathan - I can't find anything to say how to separate the strings - can they just be put on separate lines, or should they be separated by commas ..? I've wanted to do this for a while .. thanks! Lynn TB 1.60h Win2kPro Build 2195 SP2 -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2 http://www.sites.onlinemac.com/hawthorne/ Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: First post is a "Thank You!"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, June 21, 2002, at 11:15:06 AM PST, Jonathan Angliss wrote: > I know that... but go back and read his post again... and he has put > his PGP signature *below* that email request link, even though he > has the email request filter setup. Just thought that was a little > odd... but that could just be me ;) Hello Jonathan, I think it's just you! ;-) He didn't just "put" his signature below his key request mailto. He *signed* his message. There is nothing unusual at all with him signing his message, and at the same time, giving his readers the opportunity to obtain his key (so that they can then verify the signatures on his signed messages; and also, of course, send him encrypted email if they wish). Melissa - -- PGP public keys: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=0xFB04F2E9&Body=Please%20send%20keys -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEARECAAYFAj0TcBwACgkQjVbXUvsE8unCAwCdEXgIqH8bUrTwbFceY5AMcpfE x+sAoOkIkozt6lQBLt5yE50dAqryilCa =8TOQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
empty IMAP mailboxes
Hello all, How may I get TB to display empty mailboxes in my folder view to the left? These are mailboxes that do currently live on the server, but they are empty.. so TB doesn't allow me to get them via the Message Dispatcher interface.. that interface is only good if there are messages in the mailbox. Thanks! --Tomki Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: First post is a "Thank You!"
On Friday, June 21, 2002, Jonathan Angliss wrote... > On Friday, June 21, 2002, Melissa Reese wrote... >> Hello Jonathan, >> It seems that Mike, like me, prefers to offer his PGP key via a key >> request/email response - rather than upload it to the keyservers. heh... ignore me... Thanks Marck... I completely didn't see one was key, the other was signature... my apologies for the confusion ;) The original email is fine... just me ;) -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: First post is a "Thank You!"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jonathan, @21 June 2002, 12:02:21 -0500 (18:02 UK time) Jonathan Angliss wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nothing wrong at this end... except one point... you have setup a > filter to respond when somebody requests your PGP signature... ... erm ... that's "PGP key". You need that to verify the signature. > and then put your PGP signature underneath... is there any point in > one, or the other? ;) It's a bit different from S/MIME in the respect that the key is not included with the signature. You have to acquire the key elsewhere to be able to verify a signature. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9E23aOeQkq5KdzaARAndyAKDobjW0q6QsKfT57WmwtM3PCcmpugCg1z3r r85RcNKl1tZOWma9crYqpRE= =mbyy -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: First post is a "Thank You!"
On Friday, June 21, 2002, Melissa Reese wrote... > Hello Jonathan, > It seems that Mike, like me, prefers to offer his PGP key via a key > request/email response - rather than upload it to the keyservers. > It's not, as you put it, his "signature" you're requesting when you > click on his mailto and send the request email; it's his key. Once > you have his key, you can verify his signature. I know that... but go back and read his post again... and he has put his PGP signature *below* that email request link, even though he has the email request filter setup. Just thought that was a little odd... but that could just be me ;) ,- [ [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] | PGP Key mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=key_request | | -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- | Version: 2.6 `- -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: First post is a "Thank You!"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, June 21, 2002, at 10:02:21 AM PST, Jonathan Angliss wrote: > Nothing wrong at this end... except one point... you have setup a > filter to respond when somebody requests your PGP signature... and > then put your PGP signature underneath... is there any point in one, > or the other? ;) Hello Jonathan, It seems that Mike, like me, prefers to offer his PGP key via a key request/email response - rather than upload it to the keyservers. It's not, as you put it, his "signature" you're requesting when you click on his mailto and send the request email; it's his key. Once you have his key, you can verify his signature. Melissa - -- PGP public keys: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=0xFB04F2E9&Body=Please%20send%20keys -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEARECAAYFAj0Ta2IACgkQjVbXUvsE8ukMkQCfWGs2Woo7WVc4BLjuwRRz7kTm +mQAoNzFNq8sx8lqsKE5omgQYd5PB24Z =8q2V -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Under account/properties/options the ** periodically checking each * does not work
Hello Dave, >> yes. i am using zonealarm pro 3 > That's probably what your problem is. I've been using the free > version of ZA in conjunction with TB (on Win2K and WinXP) without > ever having any problems at all. However, I apparently am in the > minority. Many people have reported problems with TB that were > eliminated by the complete removal of ZoneAlarm (apparently it's > a pain to remove and you have to get instructions from > ZoneAlarm's site). Zone Alarm Pro 2.6.362 being used here with no probs what so ever on Win2k. A version higher though, and the system gets wobbly. Jon Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Questions
Spake [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 6/21/2002, at 23:55:22 +0700: > Hello Damian, DG>> This is the end of my signature. DG>> - Begin GPG Signature - DG>> DG>> -- End GPG Signature -- DG>> Which is much easier to read. > Agreed. It is a much-critisised issue, I I don't know how they could > reprogram the editor to make that exception. But the work-around is to > leave a character, for example a dot, in that line. Hrmm... Okay, I'll try that as well. (I've never programmed an editor, but I'd like to think that this be a bug... Perhaps I'll submit it.) > I don't think GPG is covered in the RFC's at all... OpenPGP Message Format: RFC2440 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2440.txt But I don't see anything about e-mail attachments in there. I remember something on a mutt mailing list (or README or Changelog or something) about the format of the inclusion of the PGP/GPG signature, just hoping someone here could refresh my memory. Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[3]: newsreader
On Friday, June 21, 2002, 6:06:21 PM, Joseph N. wrote: JN> I had read several times that Gravity was no longer being developed or JN> supported. But then I've read here some new references to it. I went JN> online to find it, but found only old references and couldn't even JN> connect to MicroPlanet. Is Gravity still being supported? It's no longer being developed or supported; it simply wasn't making any money for the people who originally developed it. However it's still available for download, & still works fine :-) I found a website which had a pretty good Gravity reference section a while back; if you'd like, I can dig it out. Deborah Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: newsreader
On Friday, June 21, 2002, "Jernej Simončič" wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: JS> It should be (but it's a long time since I used agent). I did exactly JS> this with Gravity - and I always preferred Gravity's interface to JS> Agent's. I had read several times that Gravity was no longer being developed or supported. But then I've read here some new references to it. I went online to find it, but found only old references and couldn't even connect to MicroPlanet. Is Gravity still being supported? JS> Isn't Xnews strictly online reader? Yes. Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: First post is a "Thank You!"
On Friday, June 21, 2002, Mike Apsey wrote... > Thanks folks. Nice to know if I get into a jam there's some place to > turn. Please, if you see something amiss with this first post, > please holler. Nothing wrong at this end... except one point... you have setup a filter to respond when somebody requests your PGP signature... and then put your PGP signature underneath... is there any point in one, or the other? ;) -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Questions
Hello Damian, On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 12:16:50 -0400 GMT (21/06/02, 23:16 +0700 GMT), Damian Gerow wrote: DG> This looks a lot cleaner than it actually is. I know it's only a cosmetic DG> bug, but I can't tell TB! that the last line in my message is actually a DG> blank line, to give something like this: DG> This is the end of my signature. DG> - Begin GPG Signature - DG> DG> -- End GPG Signature -- DG> Which is much easier to read. Agreed. It is a much-critisised issue, I I don't know how they could reprogram the editor to make that exception. But the work-around is to leave a character, for example a dot, in that line. DG> On that note, I seem to remember something about the OpenPGP specifying how DG> the signature was to be included -- was it by attachment, or by inclusion at DG> EOM? I don't see anything in the RFC... I don't think GPG is covered in the RFC's at all... DG> DG> Current Ver: 1.60q A sig delimiter (consisting of dash-dash-space-return) at the end of your message would be nice. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Es war eine machtvolle Demonstration. Der Marktplatz war voller Menschen. In den Nebenstrassen pflanzten sich Maenner und Frauen fort. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60q under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
First post is a "Thank You!"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: MD5 Hello List! I have lurked the archive these past few months and thought now that I'm getting comfy with filters, I'd subscribe and check-in to say thank you. I purchased TB! only recently, having migrated from Agent, which was a primary e-mail (multiple instance) for me since 1994's Agent99 rolled into an e-mail client a year later. I made the move to TB! as soon as I bought it and have never looked back. Now that I'm comfortable with it, I have begun some filtering exercises. All works as expected. Excellent software, fairly priced. TB! has been incredibly stable for me. Never a problem. Of course, no skins or such here. I love it just the way it is with only minor suggestions, which have been sent to RitLabs. Thanks folks. Nice to know if I get into a jam there's some place to turn. Please, if you see something amiss with this first post, please holler. Welp, here goes! - -- Peace, Mike MUA = TB! v1.60q (www.RitLabs.com/the_bat) Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2) PGP Key mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=key_request -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 2.6 iQCVAwUAPRNanf4YPXhWP9U5AQGsjgQAoYAxbaOy68j3lgsQhqo1b96wT0vQRowv MkvNYL7NWHoYAm3bda0VUr3QDRMCyLTZSWB+iI1+V3OKVy36RYwujVySBL3Wyu3q iNn995adw6WbYIHcnMaKlJQLVUms/fHYNb3+mBL6PyE/mdA5tu33UPA4EgUW1tVj DY5IcmfiTwA= =Y0QD -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: Why won`t the Bat get rid of old mail
On, 6/20/2002, Tony said: > Friends, > I've noticed something similar, at least in the past few versions of > The Bat (I'm on 1.60q now). The "on exit" settings seem to be ignored > for folders in trees which aren't expanded...but if I expand the > folder tree before I exit the program, the folders are purged. > How odd... > Tony > Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said at 12:09 AM on 6/20/2002: >> Hello Marcus, >> Tuesday, June 18, 2002, 10:51:13 AM, you wrote: I have the mailing list folders set to not have more than 150 mails in them (Using the folders properties window). Befor this I tried the get it to delete mails after 10 days. neither of these settings seem to do anything. MO>>> Did you tic "Remove old messages" and "Compress the folder" in the "On MO>>> exit"-section just below the settings you refer to? >> I ticked those off, and messages are still remaining in the folder. -- Best regards, Jimmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: newsreader
Hello Joseph, 21. junij 2002, 17:56:53, you wrote: JN> Is Agent good at offline reading, and can one compose messages offline JN> to be dispatched on next connection? It should be (but it's a long time since I used agent). I did exactly this with Gravity - and I always preferred Gravity's interface to Agent's. JN> I use Xnews, which I like a lot. But it's not well-geared to offline JN> reading. Isn't Xnews strictly online reader? -- Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/ ICQ: 26266467 [The Bat! v1.60d on Windows 2000 5.0.2195.Service Pack 2] 1. A clean tie attracts the soup of the day. 2. The hardness of butter is in direct proportion to the softness of the roll. -- Diners Dilemmas Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Questions
I can handle the GPG stuff for now, it's not a big deal. I'll just learn to type my passphrase faster. ;) However... Spake Thomas F on 6/21/2002, at 11:41:40 +0700: > I believe he means in the context of hitting PgDown. However, by > hitting PgDown, he keeps actively pushing the end-of-message mark > further down, rather than passively detecting it. What I mean is partially that, and partially that because TB! sees the EOM as being the last line of text in the message, any GPG signatures come directly after that. So you have something like: This is the end of my signature. -- Begin GPG Signature --- End GPG Signature --- This looks a lot cleaner than it actually is. I know it's only a cosmetic bug, but I can't tell TB! that the last line in my message is actually a blank line, to give something like this: This is the end of my signature. - Begin GPG Signature - -- End GPG Signature -- Which is much easier to read. Now granted, signatures will be stripped from most MUAs that understand PGP/GPG, but for those that don't, it gets confusing to read. On that note, I seem to remember something about the OpenPGP specifying how the signature was to be included -- was it by attachment, or by inclusion at EOM? I don't see anything in the RFC... Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: newsreader
On Friday, June 21, 2002, Nick Andriash wrote... > Agent supports scoring now? That is news to me, as it sure didn't last > time I used it, which is why I 'upgraded' to XNews. ;o) My bad... hehe... I got Xnews and Agent mixed up... some of the screens look remarkably similar ;) -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: newsreader
Subject: Newsreader From: Miguel Urech ~~ Hello Miguel, > As you may already know, I use TB for newsgroups... and with multiple > servers. Yes, with the aid of the News-to-Mail and Mail-to-News > routers of MailTraq's free version. Let me offer up some kudos to Miguel for this. I've been wanting some kind of solution such as this for a long time. I followed his little tutorial for setting it up he posted awhile back and it has been a wonderful way to access newsgroups. Being able to use TB! to read and post has made it an almost seamless marriage of e-mail and usenet. While it's not useful for just browsing around, if you have any specific newsgroups you're "subscribed" to it is a fantastic solution and one I can highly recommend. -- ò¸ó Nick Danger Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: newsreader
Hello Jonathan Angliss, In Reference to your Posting on Friday, June 21 2002 at 07:21 AM PDT, > There are so many useful features in Agent, it makes it difficult to > learn them all. The speed kill files are really useful, along with > proper support for scoring Agent supports scoring now? That is news to me, as it sure didn't last time I used it, which is why I 'upgraded' to XNews. ;o) -- Nick Andriash Courtenay, B.C. Canada Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: newsreader
On Friday, June 21, 2002, Jonathan Angliss wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: JA> There are so many useful features in Agent, it makes it difficult to JA> learn them all. Jonathan, Is Agent good at offline reading, and can one compose messages offline to be dispatched on next connection? I use Xnews, which I like a lot. But it's not well-geared to offline reading. -- JN Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
On Friday, June 21, 2002, Jonathan Angliss wrote... > Or maybe write a better error trapper for that section. I had this > occur on the other computer I installed it on within a couple of > hours of installing it [TB 1.60c]. I might spend some time, and try > regenerating it, and let Ritlabs know how I did it. It seems we've > all come to the conclusion it is a corrupt history file, as disable > using it seems to resolve the issue. Okay, thought I'd re-enable my history, see if I could possibly track down the issue that may be causing it... I noticed two things... I don't think the .his file is corrupt, but contains an extra character that it shouldn't. I'm assuming this because the subject line is recorded in there too, and I've not had it fail on the subject line. The other thing is this: http://netdork.net/doh.gif I just re-enabled my history option, started typing an address, paused for a second to let it catch up, and that happened. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
Hello David, On Friday, June 21, 2002 at 4:03:22 PM you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part): DvZ> It looks like the file isn't on the server of Ritlabs. It is, only the 'Matis - Bugtracker' seems to be buggy. Try this URL: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/files/tb/982-ACCOUNT.HIS -- Regards Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2) "Happiness is not a destination. It's the trip." Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: newsreader
On Thursday, June 20, 2002, Greg Strong wrote... > Yes the lack of multiple news servers is an issue which will be fixed > in version 2 according to Forte. I only connect to 2 news servers, so > I just run multiple instances. This is NOT a real problem. Maybe I'll get back to using it in version 2 then :) But you're right, it's not a real problem, just a convenience thing ;) > I a relative new user of Agent. I will say I can cover lots of > material with the download of headers, then download messages I want > to read. From my use I would say it has lots of features which can be > customized. There are so many useful features in Agent, it makes it difficult to learn them all. The speed kill files are really useful, along with proper support for scoring, and a nice filtering setup. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
Hello Paul, On Friday, June 21, 2002 at 09:33:18 -0400, you wrote concerning '1.60 broke': ... > The following NEW bug has been ADDED. I wanted to test the account.his file but I when I try to download the file I get the following error in my browser: ,- [ Error 404 - File Not Found ] | File "/404.shtml" was not found. | Please check the URL or report the error. | Don't forget to mention missing document's URL. '- It looks like the file isn't on the server of Ritlabs. -- Best regards, David ** Make yourself at home! Clean my kitchen. ** [TB! 1.60q] [Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2] [Running on a Celeron 800@1176 256 Mb RAM] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
On Friday, June 21, 2002, 8:01 AM, you wrote: MDP> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP> Hash: SHA1 MDP> Hi Paul, MDP> What you're not appreciating is that some specific event/data/action MDP> is causing TB to create that corruption in the data. That specific MDP> thing hasn't yet been sufficiently documented or isolated for RITlabs MDP> to fix it. Simple. It may be because of the format of an address in MDP> the history file. I'd like someone with a .his file that causes it to MDP> file a report on the BugTraq and upload the file as evidence. Then MDP> we'll see a fix. Folks that just "switch it off" or shout "hey - it MDP> sucks - it broke" are not advancing the cause. here you go: The following NEW bug has been ADDED. === https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view_bug_page.php?f_id=982 === Reporter: pbcartwright Handler: === Project:The Bat Bug ID: 982 Category: Mail Management Reproducibility:sometimes Severity: crash Priority: normal Status: new === Date Submitted: 21 Jun 2002 08:17 CDT Last Modified: 21 Jun 2002 08:17 CDT === Summary:crashes when creating new message, selecting To: Description: With history turned on, clicking the To: to auto-complete a name, it crashes TB = / Paul Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
On Friday, June 21, 2002, 8:50 AM, you wrote: TM> Hey Paul, TM> My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60q) Personal TM> to write the following on Friday, June 21, 2002 at 8:41:27 AM. PC>> um, well I went to that page, logged in anonymously, but the font PC>> is unreadable ( language?)using Opera 6.03: TM> I saw the same thing when using anon I logged in as me though, TM> and could read it. Try [ signup for a new account ] ? I signed up, created a bug report and sent the account.his and account.log files. It did crash again ;) / Paul Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
Hey Paul, My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60q) Personal to write the following on Friday, June 21, 2002 at 8:41:27 AM. PC> um, well I went to that page, logged in anonymously, but the font PC> is unreadable ( language?)using Opera 6.03: I saw the same thing when using anon I logged in as me though, and could read it. Try [ signup for a new account ] ? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! eMail v1.60q Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2) When in doubt, think. Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
On Friday, June 21, 2002, 8:28 AM, you wrote: TM> Hey Paul, PC>> I did a search and didn't find a .his file in my TB folders, TM> There should be \The Bat!\MAIL\history.his TM> and (one each) \The Bat!\MAIL\'YourAccount\account.his TM> I don't know which one is used for this (they both seem to have TM> address history information)... and of course, now when I try to creat a new message IT WORKS. PC>> and I couldn't find the link on the ritlabs page to report a bug. TM> It is in the footer of each TBUDL message. see below (last line I TM> believe). um, well I went to that page, logged in anonymously, but the font is unreadable ( language?)using Opera 6.03: RITLabs Bugtracking System - The Bat  ñèñòåìå êàê: Guest 21 Jun 2002 07:37 CDT Íà÷àëüíàÿ | Ïðîñìîòðåòü îáðàùåíèÿ | Ñòàòèñòèêà | Ìîè íàñòðîéêè | Äîêóìåíòàöèÿ | Âûéòè Îáðàùåíèé, çà êîòîðûå îòâåòñòâåííû Âû: 0 Åùå íå ðåøåííûõ ìîèõ îáðàùåíèé: 0 / Paul Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
On Friday, June 21, 2002, 8:29 AM, you wrote: >> I did a search and didn't find a .his file in my TB folders, MO> Check your account dir, in my case it's MO> "C:\Program Files\The Bat!\MAIL\marcus" and the file is namned MO> ACCOUNT.HIS well there it is! so, there will be one for every account I have. I wonder why SEARCH *.his didn't find it... >> and I couldn't find the link on the ritlabs page to report a bug. MO> It's in the list footer of every message to this list: >> Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/ DUH! of course it is! I'll create another new email, then go to the web site and send the file. thanks! / Paul Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
Hey Paul, My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60q) Personal to write the following on Friday, June 21, 2002 at 8:18:57 AM. MDP>> I'd like someone with a .his file that causes it to file a MDP>> report on the BugTraq and upload the file as evidence. PC> well, I turned the history back on, tried to create a NEW message PC> and CRASH! PC> I did a search and didn't find a .his file in my TB folders, There should be \The Bat!\MAIL\history.his and (one each) \The Bat!\MAIL\'YourAccount\account.his I don't know which one is used for this (they both seem to have address history information)... PC> and I couldn't find the link on the ritlabs page to report a bug. It is in the footer of each TBUDL message. see below (last line I believe). -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! eMail v1.60q Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2) I was the next door kid's imaginary friend. Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
On Friday, June 21, 2002, 14:18, Paul Cartwright wrote: > I did a search and didn't find a .his file in my TB folders, Check your account dir, in my case it's "C:\Program Files\The Bat!\MAIL\marcus" and the file is namned ACCOUNT.HIS > and I couldn't find the link on the ritlabs page to report a bug. It's in the list footer of every message to this list: > Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/ -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
On Friday, June 21, 2002, 8:01 AM, you wrote: MDP> What you're not appreciating is that some specific event/data/action MDP> is causing TB to create that corruption in the data. That specific MDP> thing hasn't yet been sufficiently documented or isolated for RITlabs MDP> to fix it. Simple. It may be because of the format of an address in MDP> the history file. I'd like someone with a .his file that causes it to MDP> file a report on the BugTraq and upload the file as evidence. Then MDP> we'll see a fix. Folks that just "switch it off" or shout "hey - it MDP> sucks - it broke" are not advancing the cause. well, I turned the history back on, tried to create a NEW message and CRASH! I did a search and didn't find a .his file in my TB folders, and I couldn't find the link on the ritlabs page to report a bug. can you answer those 2 questions? / Paul Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
Hi David, On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 12:15:24 +0200, you wrote: > Maybe they should write a piece of code that would delete the history > file when it's corrupted, instead of closing the whole program. Or maybe write a better error trapper for that section. I had this occur on the other computer I installed it on within a couple of hours of installing it [TB 1.60c]. I might spend some time, and try regenerating it, and let Ritlabs know how I did it. It seems we've all come to the conclusion it is a corrupt history file, as disable using it seems to resolve the issue. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
On Friday, June 21, 2002, 8:01 AM, you wrote: MDP> What you're not appreciating is that some specific event/data/action MDP> is causing TB to create that corruption in the data. That specific MDP> thing hasn't yet been sufficiently documented or isolated for RITlabs MDP> to fix it. Simple. It may be because of the format of an address in MDP> the history file. I'd like someone with a .his file that causes it to MDP> file a report on the BugTraq and upload the file as evidence. Then MDP> we'll see a fix. Folks that just "switch it off" or shout "hey - it MDP> sucks - it broke" are not advancing the cause. got it, appreciate it. I'll turn it back on and see if it gets corrupt again, I'll be happy to upload a file, I just "assumed" it had already been documented and bugtraqed. I'm not normally "the first" to find a bug ;) MDP> Not getting at you personally here, just trying to spell out what it MDP> takes to get the issue sorted out and clarify what the issue is due to. I understand your position, thanks for the clarification :0) / Paul Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Paul, @21 June 2002, 07:41:42 -0400 (12:41 UK time) Paul Cartwright wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I have winXP with an NTFS filesystem, I shouldn't have file corruption > on a new system, so how does it happen ? a TB crash maybe, where it > doesn't finish writing that file correctly?? No. By "corruption" in this context, all that is meant is "invalid data". How it got there is that TB wrote it there. Because of a bug. That's all that's being said. What you're not appreciating is that some specific event/data/action is causing TB to create that corruption in the data. That specific thing hasn't yet been sufficiently documented or isolated for RITlabs to fix it. Simple. It may be because of the format of an address in the history file. I'd like someone with a .his file that causes it to file a report on the BugTraq and upload the file as evidence. Then we'll see a fix. Folks that just "switch it off" or shout "hey - it sucks - it broke" are not advancing the cause. Not getting at you personally here, just trying to spell out what it takes to get the issue sorted out and clarify what the issue is due to. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9ExWoOeQkq5KdzaARAneyAKDj5geSzfzo889kWd8MYE7gZpCQPQCgtHcR ItcoSFiSJtRTWkld7WqOqbo= =vd3O -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
On Friday, June 21, 2002, 7:16 AM, you wrote: >> I have a real problem believing THAT many people have a corrupt >> history file. MDP> You say *that* many like there have been thousands. I don't see that. MDP> I've seen *some reports* of it happening. But it's not regular. If it MDP> could be more clearly defined as to what makes it happen then RITlabs MDP> would issue a fix for it. Instantly. They always do. The bugs that MDP> persist are the ones that can't be easily replicated elsewhere. It happened once, shame on you, twice, shame on me. I turned off the "feature" without testing it further. I have seen enough questions here about that very problem to know it isn't something I did ( tweak), isn't something I can fix, and it breaks TB when I turn it on. this is a new computer, 1.6Ghz, with 256 megs of ram, a nice new 80 gig HD, and a freshly installed TB. file corruption ??? >> ... we all seem to know this bug so we don't use the feature, right >> ? MDP> Wrong. Some have seen the bug. They don't use the feature. I've never MDP> stopped using the feature and I've never seen the bug. I have winXP with an NTFS filesystem, I shouldn't have file corruption on a new system, so how does it happen ? a TB crash maybe, where it doesn't finish writing that file correctly?? I do remember TB freezing a few times in another version, maybe then ? / Paul Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Paul, @21 June 2002, 07:04:47 -0400 (12:04 UK time) Paul Cartwright wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I have a real problem believing THAT many people have a corrupt > history file. You say *that* many like there have been thousands. I don't see that. I've seen *some reports* of it happening. But it's not regular. If it could be more clearly defined as to what makes it happen then RITlabs would issue a fix for it. Instantly. They always do. The bugs that persist are the ones that can't be easily replicated elsewhere. > seems more like a badly formatted file, Not to me. It would happen more often if it were. > a size issue, Perhaps, but doubtful. The history lists are finite in size. > or a problem with the code. That goes without saying. > ... we all seem to know this bug so we don't use the feature, right > ? Wrong. Some have seen the bug. They don't use the feature. I've never stopped using the feature and I've never seen the bug. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9EwsEOeQkq5KdzaARAiZVAJ0fzgF6c55t0w9PukEQRg/nC/QRcQCfRuoP qYDT9omB2mou2GBI6aeoejw= =tNAy -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
On Friday, June 21, 2002, 13:04, Paul Cartwright wrote: > we all seem to know this bug so we don't use the feature, right ? Not quite, many of us, like me and Marck, uses the history without any problems whatsoever. -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
On Friday, June 21, 2002, 12:54, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: > I've never seen *ever* the problem myself and have *always* had > history enabled (auto-complete from History + Default address book). Me neither, but I've seen reports where new users had this problem. Don't know how new they were though, if they run in to the history bug immediately then we wouldn't see them here I guess. Take a look at the recently posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for instance. -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
On Friday, June 21, 2002, 6:54 AM, you wrote: MDP> Are you sure? The impression I had was that it was only mature / MDP> legacy history lists with corrupt entries that caused this problem. MDP> Once the history was restarted the bug was gone. >> I for certain would not keep evaluating a program which I couldn't >> use more than one time. MDP> Quite right, but I don't think that's the case. I could be wrong, but MDP> I've never seen *ever* the problem myself and have *always* had MDP> history enabled (auto-complete from History + Default address book). MDP> So why are you all (both?) saying new users are going to have this MDP> problem? make that three of us. Like I said, it happened to me very soon after I started using TB, then it reappered when I reinstalled on my brand-new Dell computer, within days. / Paul Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
On Friday, June 21, 2002, 5:54 AM, you wrote: >> Shouldn't Ritlabs fix this? Because when new users want to test TB! >> and it shuts down the minute they try to enter something in the TO: >> field, they might leave TB! right away. MDP> Erm ... new users have empty history lists, so it doesn't happen to MDP> them. Another fix is to delete the existing history list. The problem MDP> is a corrupt list, not a bug in the code (although the code should be MDP> robust enough to withstand the corruption, but that's not the point MDP> I'm making). I have a real problem believing THAT many people have a corrupt history file. seems more like a badly formatted file, a size issue, or a problem with the code. How come I don't have any OTHER corrupt files in TB ( or anywhere else on my computer??), we all seem to know this bug so we don't use the feature, right ? It happened to me when I started using TB, then it happened to me when I reinstalled it on my brand-new Dell computer a month later. / Paul Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Marcus, @21 June 2002, 12:32:57 +0200 (11:32 UK time) Marcus Ohlström wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Erm ... new users have empty history lists, so it doesn't happen to >> them. > Yes, when they send their first email. At the time of their second > the history list is no longer empty and TB! would shut itself down. Are you sure? The impression I had was that it was only mature / legacy history lists with corrupt entries that caused this problem. Once the history was restarted the bug was gone. > I for certain would not keep evaluating a program which I couldn't > use more than one time. Quite right, but I don't think that's the case. I could be wrong, but I've never seen *ever* the problem myself and have *always* had history enabled (auto-complete from History + Default address book). So why are you all (both?) saying new users are going to have this problem? - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9EwXpOeQkq5KdzaARAoxUAJsFNtFzukMGKEeMZ8NtqWDq5aAIugCeJFQa SMIqFbmTMwHT4gzWSB1x4IY= =9Izr -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[3]: Under account/properties/options the ** periodically checking each * does not work
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Friday, June 21, 2002 6:45:10 AM RE: "Under account/properties/options the ** periodically checking each * does not work" Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Greetings vj135doppa, On Thursday, June 20, 2002, 2:58:43 PM, you wrote: vj135doppa> Did CTRL + DELETE = confirmed that no other application is vj135doppa> running.Now i start web2pop it still says another application is vj135doppa> using port 110.Although it says that there is an icon of web2pop in vj135doppa> the system tray so i right click it and change the port # to port vj135doppa> 8110 as mentioned in their website FAQ.Now it say another app is vj135doppa> using port 8110. Open up your command prompt window and type "netstat -a", without the quotes, at the prompt. You should then see a list of open, listening and waiting ports, i.e.; Active Connections Proto Local Address Foreign AddressState TCPblackhole:smtp blackhole:0LISTENING TCPblackhole:epmapblackhole:0LISTENING This should give you an indication of what the status of port 110 is. It may be indicated as pop instead of 110 just as 25 (listed above) is is indicated as SMTP (I run my own SMTP server here and that is why it is presented as being in the "listening" state). Anyway Hope this helps. - -- Regards, DG Raftery Sr. I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 9.0b1 iQA/AwUBPRMF2IltdOMeoDcuEQKSMwCgiZdvWajYz3UtsrocPF58LwffIOQAoJZQ knz0pf7ff4WR7YD50rwCUecv =bu06 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
On Friday, June 21, 2002, 11:54, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: > Erm ... new users have empty history lists, so it doesn't happen to > them. Yes, when they send their first email. At the time of their second the history list is no longer empty and TB! would shut itself down. I for certain would not keep evaluating a program which I couldn't use more than one time. -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
Hello Marck, On Friday, June 21, 2002 at 10:54:31 +0100, you wrote concerning '1.60 broke': ... > Erm ... new users have empty history lists, so it doesn't happen to > them. Another fix is to delete the existing history list. O yes of course, I didn't think about that. ;-) > The problem is a corrupt list, not a bug in the code (although the > code should be robust enough to withstand the corruption, but that's > not the point I'm making). Maybe they should write a piece of code that would delete the history file when it's corrupted, instead of closing the whole program. -- Best regards, David ** I am Pooh of Borg: I think I'll assimilate a little something today. ** [TB! 1.60q] [Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2] [Running on a Celeron 800@1176 256 Mb RAM] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi David, @21 June 2002, 11:38:38 +0200 (10:38 UK time) David van Zuijlekom wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://www.mail-archive.com/tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com/msg40261.html >> Try that :) > Shouldn't Ritlabs fix this? Because when new users want to test TB! > and it shuts down the minute they try to enter something in the TO: > field, they might leave TB! right away. Erm ... new users have empty history lists, so it doesn't happen to them. Another fix is to delete the existing history list. The problem is a corrupt list, not a bug in the code (although the code should be robust enough to withstand the corruption, but that's not the point I'm making). - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9EvfZOeQkq5KdzaARAtPhAJsHsqWfZzuZRuXmB7C8Dh+BToBXIQCeNlzv cBPAI6sW8aSSSLOP11EpqIA= =Bn6j -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
Hello Jonathan, On Friday, June 21, 2002 at 21:50:44 -0500, you wrote concerning '1.60 broke': ... > http://www.mail-archive.com/tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com/msg40261.html > Try that :) Shouldn't Ritlabs fix this? Because when new users want to test TB! and it shuts down the minute they try to enter something in the TO: field, they might leave TB! right away. -- Best regards, David ** D)inner not ready: (A)bort (R)etry (P)izza ** [TB! 1.60q] [Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2] [Running on a Celeron 800@1176 256 Mb RAM] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: Auto-reply by filter no longer working :-(
Original message received from Marcus Ohlström on 20/06/02 MO> On Thursday, June 20, 2002, 23:22, Chris Weaven wrote: MO> The filters are interpreted from top to bottom and TB! stops when it MO> first hits a filter that matches. If you want to keep processing with MO> other filters, tic "Continue processing with other filters" on the MO> Options tab. MO> Does this information help? Thanks Marcus. I changed the order and ticked the box and all seems to be working fine again now! Chris. Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Deleting from Server _after_ downloading and reading
Hello Jim, It was Thursday, June 20, 2002 at 9:24 AM, when Jim [J] wrote: J> Viewing the mail in TB and then opening the Dispatch Mail window is J> not especially efficient IMO. I was just wondering if TB had a J> "better way" of doing it than that. :) You could use a manual filter with the action "Delete message from Server". It works quite effectively. -- Thanks for writing, Januk Aggarwal I should probably engage that largish, grey organ lurking inside of my skull a bit more often. I think it's called a brain. -- Simon Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Edited Shortcut file to find
Hallo Peter, On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 18:01:45 -0400GMT (21-6-02, 0:01 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: PK> I presume I have not moved the file which contains the shortcuts. PK> Would appreciate any advise of which file contains them. I suppose that would be shortcuts.cfg, the file can be found in the directory that TB uses as default directory for new accounts. -- Groetjes, Roelof Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
