Re: [U2] Query about UniVerse database
Hello Avinash, I haven't seen any response to Your query so I'll give it a try: Arrow and function keys are supposed to send 'special characters' (e.g. escape [ Afor cursor up ) and the server is supposed to return a command sequence to the terminal emulator ( often but not necessarily the same ). Both the escape sequences and the comand sequences vary for different terminal emulations. So it's important to get the choosen terminal emulation and the terminal type in universe to match. If the problem persists check Your terminfo settings ( at least for Your terminal emulator ) and needs to be fixed. Terminfo settings are described in detail in an appendix of the universe System Administration manual. A good trick to capture the complete escape sequences from the terminal is to into the editor and Insert a line with the arrow key and the inspect the line in up-arrow mode. hth --- mats Avinash wrote: Hello Sir, Well, when I use the SSH Secure Shell (Version 3.2.0) my arrow keys are configured for some special characters. Can I configure them in such a way that instead of displaying special characters, they need to move in their respective directions. - ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] Windows 2003 password
Hi All, Universe 10.0.4 Windows 2003 Server I want to change the Windows 2003 password via my UV application (thru Telnet). The application is totally dependant on the Windows user + password for security, and I want the users to change their own passwords say every 30 days. Is it possible? Note: If the Windows 2003 password setup says every 30 days you must change our password - you can work for longer thru UV + telnet, without Windows 2003 forcing you to change your password. Is this a short-coming of UV ? Louie --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] Windows 2003 password
Yes this is possible. We only ever change our passwords within Universe. I will go and try to find out how it gets done. I think some bright spark wrote a bit of c code to do it all... Les -Original Message- From: Louie Gouws [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 February 2005 12:59 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Windows 2003 password Hi All, Universe 10.0.4 Windows 2003 Server I want to change the Windows 2003 password via my UV application (thru Telnet). The application is totally dependant on the Windows user + password for security, and I want the users to change their own passwords say every 30 days. Is it possible? Note: If the Windows 2003 password setup says every 30 days you must change our password - you can work for longer thru UV + telnet, without Windows 2003 forcing you to change your password. Is this a short-coming of UV ? Louie --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee only. If you have received this message in error, you must not copy, distribute or disclose the contents; please notify the sender immediately and delete the message. This message is attributed to the sender and may not necessarily reflect the view of Travis Perkins plc or its subsidiaries (Travis Perkins). Agreements binding Travis Perkins may not be concluded by means of e-mail communication. E-mail transmissions are not secure and Travis Perkins accepts no responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Whilst steps have been taken to ensure that this message is virus free, Travis Perkins accepts no liability for infection and recommends that you scan this e-mail and any attachments. Part of Travis Perkins plc. Registered Office: Lodge Way House, Lodge Way, Harlestone Road, Northampton, NN5 7UG. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] Windows 2003 password
When the passwords on our domain expire the next time the user logs in they have to use the new password. Are you letting your users stayed logged-on for days? Universe won't look at the password again until it needs it to access a resource or start a session. We autologout our users after 59 minutes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Louie Gouws Sent: 10 February 2005 12:59 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Windows 2003 password Hi All, Universe 10.0.4 Windows 2003 Server I want to change the Windows 2003 password via my UV application (thru Telnet). The application is totally dependant on the Windows user + password for security, and I want the users to change their own passwords say every 30 days. Is it possible? Note: If the Windows 2003 password setup says every 30 days you must change our password - you can work for longer thru UV + telnet, without Windows 2003 forcing you to change your password. Is this a short-coming of UV ? Louie --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2][UV] Synonym Accounts
Is there a way to set up a synonym account in UniVerse. Say I have an account called TEST and the path to the account is /home/TEST. I want to create an account called TEST.SYN who's path is also /home/TEST. I have figured out if I edit a record in UV.ACCOUNT called TEST.SYN and put /home/TEST in field 11 that I can logto TEST.SYN and it will take me there, but when I type in WHO it tells me the account is TEST. I want to set up the account so that when I say WHO it tells me TEST.SYN, but is actually using all of TEST's VOC entries. Is this possible in UniVerse? Thanks. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Universe to Web interface
Glen B... If you can truly pass a UV socket handle to another UV process, then there's no reason why anyone can't write a stable multi-threaded socket server directly in UV BASIC. Is this true? Kevin P Lynch... here is the appropriate manual : http://publibfi.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/25119080.pdf You most definitely *cannot* pass a UV socket handle to another UV process. Simon --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2][UV] Synonym Accounts
quote who=Nick Cipollina Is there a way to set up a synonym account in UniVerse. Say I have an account called TEST and the path to the account is /home/TEST. I want to create an account called TEST.SYN who's path is also /home/TEST. I have figured out if I edit a record in UV.ACCOUNT called TEST.SYN and put /home/TEST in field 11 that I can logto TEST.SYN and it will take me there, but when I type in WHO it tells me the account is TEST. I want to set up the account so that when I say WHO it tells me TEST.SYN, but is actually using all of TEST's VOC entries. Is this possible in UniVerse? Thanks. I think UV reports the 'home' directory of the account, without the leading path by querying the OS with a 'pwd' or equivalent command. I'm not sure you can do what I'm about to suggest. There used to be some very big problems with using symbolic links, but here goes. You could create a symbolic link in /home: ln -s /home/TEST /home/TEST.SYN then log to TEST.SYN and see what happens. This may cause problems, however, so I hope someone on the list with this specific experience answers back. Karl Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ -- Karl L. Pearson Director of IT, ATS Industrial Supply Direct: 801-978-4429 Toll-free: 800-789-9300 1,29 Fax: 801-972-3888 http://www.atsindustrial.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] Synonym Accounts
Try the UniVerse command IAM TEST.SYN HTH Jeff Fitzgerald Fitzgerald Long, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 9:11 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2][UV] Synonym Accounts Is there a way to set up a synonym account in UniVerse. Say I have an account called TEST and the path to the account is /home/TEST. I want to create an account called TEST.SYN who's path is also /home/TEST. I have figured out if I edit a record in UV.ACCOUNT called TEST.SYN and put /home/TEST in field 11 that I can logto TEST.SYN and it will take me there, but when I type in WHO it tells me the account is TEST. I want to set up the account so that when I say WHO it tells me TEST.SYN, but is actually using all of TEST's VOC entries. Is this possible in UniVerse? Thanks. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] UniBasic CRLF over NFS mount
If you're using FTP to do the transfer from UNIX to DOS (which you say you are) then make the the FTP Transfer mode is ASCII, it usually defaults to BINARY (BIN). Most FTP clients will automatically convert CR to CRLF when transfering in ASCII mode. ASSIGN 1 to SYSTEM(1017) In Unidata the equivalent command for no conversion is NOCONVERT [ON | OFF] Thanks, -- Donald Verhagen Application Development Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tandem Staffing Solutions, Inc. 1690 S Congress Avenue, Suite 210 Delray Beach, FL 33445 USA Voice Phone: 561.454.3592 Fax Phone: 561.454.3640 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7:37:01 PM 02/09/2005 There should be a ux2dos or unix2dos program in the operating system you can use to convert cr to crlf. Example: cat foo.txt| ux2dos new.txt ; mv new.txt foo.txt You can execute this statement from your basic program etc... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Wed Feb 09 16:33:13 2005 Subject: [U2] UniBasic CRLF over NFS mount I'm building a flat file in UniBasic on a unix system, then writing it to an NFS mount point. The file attributes are interpreted as CRLF's when I ftp the file over to the windows system, but when I write or move the file over to the NFS mount, the attributes are only separated by unrecognizable characters (to notepad). The problem is, the version of the (BarTender) application I'm upgrading to, requires a CRLF before/after one of the attributes. Any suggestions/thoughts? TIA, Amy --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2][UV] Synonym Accounts
There is a command called IAM in universe that does that. So on the TEST account you can create a VOC paragraph called TEST.SYN and put PA :@AM: IAM TEST.SYN That paragraph would only run when you logged to TEST.SYN, it wouldn't change anything if you logged to just TEST That might work. -Dianne Nick Cipollina wrote: Is there a way to set up a synonym account in UniVerse. Say I have an account called TEST and the path to the account is /home/TEST. I want to create an account called TEST.SYN who's path is also /home/TEST. I have figured out if I edit a record in UV.ACCOUNT called TEST.SYN and put /home/TEST in field 11 that I can logto TEST.SYN and it will take me there, but when I type in WHO it tells me the account is TEST. I want to set up the account so that when I say WHO it tells me TEST.SYN, but is actually using all of TEST's VOC entries. Is this possible in UniVerse? Thanks. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe to Web interface
I seem to recall after doing some playing with sockets awhile back that you can pass the handle to a subroutine? The one downside that I can think of with having UV being the socket handling, is if the site can pounded, it could slow down UV, whereas if a webserver get's maxed out, it shouldn't affect UV (key word - shouldn't) George -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Simon Lewington Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 11:42 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Universe to Web interface here is the appropriate manual : http://publibfi.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/25119080.pdf You most definitely *cannot* pass a UV socket handle to another UV process. Simon --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe to Web interface
Sounds like you want to look into a product called MVInternet. We are just starting to use this here, but from what I have seen it is easy to use. Here is a link: http://www.pixiussoftware.com/mvinternet.php Rich Taylor | Senior Programmer/Analyst| VERTIS 250 W. Pratt Street | Baltimore, MD 21201 P 410.361.8688 | F 410.528.0319 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.vertisinc.com Vertis is the premier provider of targeted advertising, media, and marketing services that drive consumers to marketers more effectively. The more they complicate the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the drain - Montgomery Scott NCC-1701 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 1:30 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Universe to Web interface In a message dated 2/9/2005 5:34:48 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I still don't get why you want to use a BAT file to do this at all. IF you're using IIS, you should really be using ASP. I don't. Here is what I want From a web page, click on something, which in ANY fashion reaches into Universe and displays the results on that web page. Focusing on the ANY fashion, any way, any how, any method, with example code please so I don't go insane trying to follow the hand-waving. And preferable I'm looking for the absolutely simplest manner of doing this. And the free way too ... btw. PS thanks for those of you who sent various examples of doing this. Will --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2][UV] Synonym Accounts
oneway... but not sure if it's advised... call iamwho(@who) subroutine iamwho(whoiam) whoiam='not who you think' return then at tcl who This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] Synonym Accounts
This is exactly what I was looking for!! Thank you very much. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dianne Ackerman Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 11:59 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2][UV] Synonym Accounts There is a command called IAM in universe that does that. So on the TEST account you can create a VOC paragraph called TEST.SYN and put PA :@AM: IAM TEST.SYN That paragraph would only run when you logged to TEST.SYN, it wouldn't change anything if you logged to just TEST That might work. -Dianne Nick Cipollina wrote: Is there a way to set up a synonym account in UniVerse. Say I have an account called TEST and the path to the account is /home/TEST. I want to create an account called TEST.SYN who's path is also /home/TEST. I have figured out if I edit a record in UV.ACCOUNT called TEST.SYN and put /home/TEST in field 11 that I can logto TEST.SYN and it will take me there, but when I type in WHO it tells me the account is TEST. I want to set up the account so that when I say WHO it tells me TEST.SYN, but is actually using all of TEST's VOC entries. Is this possible in UniVerse? Thanks. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] Synonym Accounts
An account can utilize multiple directories and a directory can be utilized by multiple accounts. In our environment, we have our data files in one directory while the programs are in another. This way we can upgrade the software without having to worry about which files are which. BobW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter D Olson Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 9:50 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2][UV] Synonym Accounts WHO only tells you what directory you are in, I've never seen a way to tell you what account you logged to. really dumb question time What is the difference between an account and a directory ??? other then a directory dosn't have to be an account ? This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UniBasic CRLF over NFS mount
Actually, it was working ftp, but not over NFS which is what I needed. File was being created w/ LF only after each attribute, but needed a CRLF. Added a CHAR(13) to end of each attribute, so it creates it now CRLF, which is what I was missing. Thanks, Amy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Verhagen Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 8:55 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] UniBasic CRLF over NFS mount If you're using FTP to do the transfer from UNIX to DOS (which you say you are) then make the the FTP Transfer mode is ASCII, it usually defaults to BINARY (BIN). Most FTP clients will automatically convert CR to CRLF when transfering in ASCII mode. ASSIGN 1 to SYSTEM(1017) In Unidata the equivalent command for no conversion is NOCONVERT [ON | OFF] Thanks, -- Donald Verhagen Application Development Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tandem Staffing Solutions, Inc. 1690 S Congress Avenue, Suite 210 Delray Beach, FL 33445 USA Voice Phone: 561.454.3592 Fax Phone: 561.454.3640 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7:37:01 PM 02/09/2005 There should be a ux2dos or unix2dos program in the operating system you can use to convert cr to crlf. Example: cat foo.txt| ux2dos new.txt ; mv new.txt foo.txt You can execute this statement from your basic program etc... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Wed Feb 09 16:33:13 2005 Subject: [U2] UniBasic CRLF over NFS mount I'm building a flat file in UniBasic on a unix system, then writing it to an NFS mount point. The file attributes are interpreted as CRLF's when I ftp the file over to the windows system, but when I write or move the file over to the NFS mount, the attributes are only separated by unrecognizable characters (to notepad). The problem is, the version of the (BarTender) application I'm upgrading to, requires a CRLF before/after one of the attributes. Any suggestions/thoughts? TIA, Amy --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe to Web interface
OK. That's what I thought. UV is in the same situation as all the other flavors. If you can't pass a file handle between processes, then you can't effectively create a multi-client service by using just the sockets API. There have been numerous web/socket architecture examples published, in terms of code and/or postings on C.D.P. JD3 is a Java-focused socket service that uses a port gateway, which redirects(client disconnects and then reconnects) incoming connections from a master listener to 'child' listeners. This is a stable method, which does not require sessions to be initiated. The biggest drawbacks are the reconnect lag, port firewalling issues, and requirement of the port master to constantly keep up with who/what is really running on the MV side. This is considered an internal architecture. No non-MV components are needed. Coyote is an internal HTTP service all in its own world. hat off to Doug FlashCONNECT is an HTTP POST/GET service that has client-side and server-side services running. I don't know all the details of how the 2 services communicate, but the request is sent to a local(webserver-CGI-local) service. That service is already connected to matching services in MV. The communication paths are pre-established, so there is zero lag between CGI request and MV processing. The only problem there is the fact that the communication paths are pre-established. It's a dual-edged sword. Monitors have been added to recent releases, to deal with previous load and license balancing problems. This is the most effective mixed architecture I've seen so far. MVWWW is an open communications framework that utilizes an open mixed architecture. The 2(or 3 if you separate the client component) architecture 'zones' are separate. The CGI(or client), the spooler, and the service zones can be separated and used by themselves for other purposes. This modularization allows flexibility in integration. However, it also leads to security and content management issues. I, as a developer, prefer this style of architecture over mixed or internal-only simply because of the flexibility. RedBack.. hm.. never touched it. One of these days I'll get around to it. I run FlashCONNECT here mostly because I'm still running D3. Times'r changing though. I develop MVWWW on my OpenQM developer box. When Doug releases Coyote for OpenQM, I'll definitely be running it through the hoops too. When someone asks how I do pull MV data using my browser, I like to sit back and watch the fur fly. I lost count of the number of methods discussed for getting MV data into a browser. Maybe one of these days a web-based communication integration wizard will be created. Until then, I wish more of this kind of information was compacted, indexed, and published on the web. If anyone has any further comments or questions for me, e-mail me directly. I've wasted enough list space. Hey Chuck.. you lurkin? I got another article idea for ya. G -Glen http://picksource.com webmaster [at] mvdevcentral [dot] com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Simon Lewington Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 11:42 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Universe to Web interface Glen B... If you can truly pass a UV socket handle to another UV process, then there's no reason why anyone can't write a stable multi-threaded socket server directly in UV BASIC. Is this true? Kevin P Lynch... here is the appropriate manual : http://publibfi.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/25119080.pdf You most definitely *cannot* pass a UV socket handle to another UV process. Simon --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe to Web interface (Unclassified)
George, I'm afraid Simon is right, I struck a similar problem with BCI. IIRC, the socket handle must be a single variable (not an element in a static or dynamic array), and cannot be in a COMMON block. This means that while it can be passed as a parameter on the call sequence of a subroutine, but not otherwise passed from one program to another. Regards Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Gallen Sent: Friday, 11 February 2005 06:05 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe to Web interface I seem to recall after doing some playing with sockets awhile back that you can pass the handle to a subroutine? The one downside that I can think of with having UV being the socket handling, is if the site can pounded, it could slow down UV, whereas if a webserver get's maxed out, it shouldn't affect UV (key word - shouldn't) George -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Simon Lewington Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 11:42 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Universe to Web interface here is the appropriate manual : http://publibfi.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/25119080.pdf You most definitely *cannot* pass a UV socket handle to another UV process. Simon The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or distribute this message or the information in it. If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone the sender immediately. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe to Web interface (Unclassified)
what about with a data / input sequence? DATA varib CHAIN PROGRAM INPUT varib Haven't tried it...Although from the sounds of it, I'd expect an Invalid Data Type error on the DATA... George -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of HENDERSON MIKE, MR Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 2:31 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe to Web interface (Unclassified) George, I'm afraid Simon is right, I struck a similar problem with BCI. IIRC, the socket handle must be a single variable (not an element in a static or dynamic array), and cannot be in a COMMON block. This means that while it can be passed as a parameter on the call sequence of a subroutine, but not otherwise passed from one program to another. Regards Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Gallen Sent: Friday, 11 February 2005 06:05 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe to Web interface I seem to recall after doing some playing with sockets awhile back that you can pass the handle to a subroutine? The one downside that I can think of with having UV being the socket handling, is if the site can pounded, it could slow down UV, whereas if a webserver get's maxed out, it shouldn't affect UV (key word - shouldn't) George -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Simon Lewington Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 11:42 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Universe to Web interface here is the appropriate manual : http://publibfi.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/25119080.pdf You most definitely *cannot* pass a UV socket handle to another UV process. Simon The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or distribute this message or the information in it. If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone the sender immediately. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe to Web interface
Seems that a lot of you guys are trying to reinvent the wheel. There are several products on the market that have solved everything I've seen mentioned in this thread and then some. Most notably Redback and Raining Data's Pick Data Provider. I can understand if you have absolutely zero budget but these products aren't THAT expensive. Mike R. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Has anyone played with/tested UniVerse 10+ under Solaris 10
Hola all - We've suddenly had some resources freed up from another project and are looking to rapidly replace the 12-14 year old SGI Challenge Ls (which, truly, are still performing magnificently in most respects) we have our UniVerse 9.6 installation on. We've so far primarily tested on U2 10.1.x running on redHat AS 3.2 and we're starting to get quotes for hardware, and we've concentrated on x86 so far; the Sun guys came by today pitched a very nice price for 4 way Opteron based 40Zs, but they also made a fairly strong case for the virtualization/compartmentalization features of Solaris 10. I know it's kind of early yet, but has anyone tried running U2 in these containers? I'm fascinated by the idea (as we could dual-purpose the box and not have to worry so much about our high-availability needs), but it will take a while before I can actually get to trying it out on the SunBlade 100 here, so I'm interested if anyone's tried this, perhaps from the Solaris 10 betas. Thanks very much for any input. -- Peter Ivanick Sr. Programmer/Analyst School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 215.573.2306Fax: 215.573.8777 http://www.vet.upenn.edu/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Has anyone played with/tested UniVerse 10+ under Solaris 10
Yes (v490). Problem is that Universe is compiled against Solaris 7 so you get absolutely no benefit of later versions. Also as far as I know Universe does not run on Opteron. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Ivanick Sent: 10 February 2005 21:04 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Has anyone played with/tested UniVerse 10+ under Solaris 10 Hola all - We've suddenly had some resources freed up from another project and are looking to rapidly replace the 12-14 year old SGI Challenge Ls (which, truly, are still performing magnificently in most respects) we have our UniVerse 9.6 installation on. We've so far primarily tested on U2 10.1.x running on redHat AS 3.2 and we're starting to get quotes for hardware, and we've concentrated on x86 so far; the Sun guys came by today pitched a very nice price for 4 way Opteron based 40Zs, but they also made a fairly strong case for the virtualization/compartmentalization features of Solaris 10. I know it's kind of early yet, but has anyone tried running U2 in these containers? I'm fascinated by the idea (as we could dual-purpose the box and not have to worry so much about our high-availability needs), but it will take a while before I can actually get to trying it out on the SunBlade 100 here, so I'm interested if anyone's tried this, perhaps from the Solaris 10 betas. Thanks very much for any input. -- Peter Ivanick Sr. Programmer/Analyst School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 215.573.2306Fax: 215.573.8777 http://www.vet.upenn.edu/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Re: U2 Universe to Web Interface SALES
Please let me know if you'd like to see applications using PixieWeb or if you'd like to evaluate PixieWeb. Do you have a demo disk? Thanks Will --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Has anyone played with/tested UniVerse 10+ under Solaris 10
It will as a 32-bit application. You can run a single Opteron on a dual-board and you still get the benefit of 64-bit hardware. I have Win2K Pro running on that setup right now serving huge files. Glen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Adrian Matthews Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 5:55 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Has anyone played with/tested UniVerse 10+ under Solaris 10 Yes (v490). Problem is that Universe is compiled against Solaris 7 so you get absolutely no benefit of later versions. Also as far as I know Universe does not run on Opteron. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Ivanick Sent: 10 February 2005 21:04 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Has anyone played with/tested UniVerse 10+ under Solaris 10 Hola all - We've suddenly had some resources freed up from another project and are looking to rapidly replace the 12-14 year old SGI Challenge Ls (which, truly, are still performing magnificently in most respects) we have our UniVerse 9.6 installation on. We've so far primarily tested on U2 10.1.x running on redHat AS 3.2 and we're starting to get quotes for hardware, and we've concentrated on x86 so far; the Sun guys came by today pitched a very nice price for 4 way Opteron based 40Zs, but they also made a fairly strong case for the virtualization/compartmentalization features of Solaris 10. I know it's kind of early yet, but has anyone tried running U2 in these containers? I'm fascinated by the idea (as we could dual-purpose the box and not have to worry so much about our high-availability needs), but it will take a while before I can actually get to trying it out on the SunBlade 100 here, so I'm interested if anyone's tried this, perhaps from the Solaris 10 betas. Thanks very much for any input. -- Peter Ivanick Sr. Programmer/Analyst School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 215.573.2306Fax: 215.573.8777 http://www.vet.upenn.edu/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Universe to Web interface
I have submitted an article for the Mar/April edition of Spectrum detailing how to set up web services for U2 so that PHP (and anything else supporting w/s) can interact with U2. I can't distribute it widely, obviously, but if one or two people are sincerely interested in trying this out, please contact me off-list. Best, David Beahm U2 Users Digest wrote: U2 Users Digest Thursday, February 10 2005 Volume 01 : Number 496 Re: [U2] Universe to Web interface --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Re: U2 Universe to Web Interface
First, that last message wasn't supposed to go to the whole group. So sorry about that. Second, I will be trying out the various examples I was sent, over the next few days and report back on what seems the easiest or best or whatever. Will --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] Windows 2003 password
Try this from the UV command prompt. You may need to qualify the domain if you are using domain based security. DOS /C NET USER user_id new_passwd [/domain] See C:\NET HELP USER for all the other net user options -Original Message- I want to change the Windows 2003 password via my UV application (thru Telnet). Is it possible? ** This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support Centre (61 3 9269 7555) immediately who will advise further action. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. ** --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] Windows 2003 password
Thanks everybody. It worked - DOS /C NET USER user_id new_password Louie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 February 2005 03:19 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Windows 2003 password Try this from the UV command prompt. You may need to qualify the domain if you are using domain based security. DOS /C NET USER user_id new_passwd [/domain] See C:\NET HELP USER for all the other net user options -Original Message- I want to change the Windows 2003 password via my UV application (thru Telnet). Is it possible? ** This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support Centre (61 3 9269 7555) immediately who will advise further action. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. ** --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
