Re: [zfs-discuss] 3ware support

2008-02-19 Thread Dave Johnson
Nice putrid spew of FUD regarding 3Ware cards.

Regarding the SuperMicro 8-port SATA PCI-X card, yes, that is a good 
recommendation.

-=dave
  - Original Message - 
  From: Rob Windsor 
  To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org 
  Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 12:39 PM
  Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] 3ware support

  3ware cards do not work (as previously specified).  Even in 
  linux/windows, they're pretty flaky -- if you had Solaris drivers, you'd 
  probably shoot yourself in a month anyway.

  I'm using the SuperMicro aoc-sat2-mv8 at the recommendation of someone 
  else on this list.  It's a JBOD card, which is perfect for ZFS.  Also, 
  you won't be paying for RAID functionality that you're wanting to 
  disable anyway.

  Rob++___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] 3ware support

2008-02-13 Thread Tim
On 2/13/08, Tom Buskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Are you using the Supermicro in Solaris or OpenSolaris?  Which version?
 64 bit or 32 bits?

 I'm asking because I recently went through a number of SCSI cards that are
 in the HCL as supported, but do not have 64 bit drivers.  So they only work
 in 32 bit mode.


 This message posted from opensolaris.org
 ___
 zfs-discuss mailing list
 zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
 http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss



64bit (amd opteron), both solaris and opensolaris.  Solaris 10u4, and
opensolaris from b68 onwards.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] 3ware support

2008-02-13 Thread Tom Buskey
Are you using the Supermicro in Solaris or OpenSolaris?  Which version?
64 bit or 32 bits?

I'm asking because I recently went through a number of SCSI cards that are in 
the HCL as supported, but do not have 64 bit drivers.  So they only work in 32 
bit mode.
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] 3ware support

2008-02-13 Thread Rob Windsor
Tom Buskey wrote:
 Are you using the Supermicro in Solaris or OpenSolaris?  Which version?
 64 bit or 32 bits?
 
 I'm asking because I recently went through a number of SCSI cards that are in 
 the HCL as supported, but do not have 64 bit drivers.  So they only work in 
 32 bit mode.

Solaris-10/0807 32-bit (pentium-4)

Rob++
-- 
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __o
Life: [EMAIL PROTECTED]_`\,_
(_)/ (_)
They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance.
   -- Major General John Sedgwick
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] 3ware support

2008-02-12 Thread Nicolas Szalay
Le mardi 12 février 2008 à 07:22 +0100, Johan Kooijman a écrit :
 Goodmorning all,

Hi,

 can anyone confirm that 3ware raid controllers are indeed not working
 under Solaris/OpenSolaris? I can't seem to find it in the HCL.

I do confirm they don't work

 We're now using a 3Ware 9550SX as a S-ATA RAID controller. The
 original plan was to disable all it's RAID functions and use justs the
 S-ATA controller functionality for ZFS deployment.
 
 If indeed 3Ware isn't support, I have to buy a new controller. Any
 specific controller/brand you can recommend for Solaris?

I use Areca cards, with the driver supplied by Areca (certified in the
HCL)

Have a nice day,

-- 
Nicolas Szalay

Administrateur systèmes  réseaux

-- _
ASCII ribbon campaign ( )
 - against HTML email  X
  vCards / \


signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message	numériquement signée
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] 3ware support

2008-02-12 Thread Lida Horn
Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
 X4500 problems seconded. Still having issues with port resets due to
 the Marvell driver. Though they seem considerably more transient and
 less likely to lock up the entire systems in the most recent ( b72)
 OpenSolaris builds.
   
Build 72 is pretty old.  The build date for that build was August 27, 2007.
It looks like build 75 should have been pretty good (October 8, 2007), but
for absolute, most up-to-date stuff you want build 84 (which will be
in a build on February 25, 2008).  The source code changes are
already visible in OpenSolaris and the marvell88sx binary is likewise
down loadable (I wish I could provide the source, but Marvell says no).

Please try something more recent than over 5 months old.

Regards,
Lida
 -J

 On Feb 12, 2008 9:35 AM, Carson Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 Tim wrote:
 
 A much cheaper (and probably the BEST supported card), is the supermicro
 based on the marvell chipset.  This is the same chipset that is used in
 the thumper x4500 so you know that the folks at sun are doing their due
 diligence to make sure the drivers are solid.
   
 Except the drivers _aren't_ solid, at least in Solaris(tm). The
 OpenSolaris drivers may have been fixed (I know a lot of work is going
 into them, but I haven't tested them), but those fixes have not made it
 back into the supported realm.

 So if you need to run a supported OS, I'd skip the Marvell chips if
 possible, at least for now.

 --
 Carson

 ___
 zfs-discuss mailing list
 zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
 http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

 
 ___
 zfs-discuss mailing list
 zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
 http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
   

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] 3ware support

2008-02-12 Thread Jason J. W. Williams
X4500 problems seconded. Still having issues with port resets due to
the Marvell driver. Though they seem considerably more transient and
less likely to lock up the entire systems in the most recent ( b72)
OpenSolaris builds.

-J

On Feb 12, 2008 9:35 AM, Carson Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Tim wrote:
 

  A much cheaper (and probably the BEST supported card), is the supermicro
  based on the marvell chipset.  This is the same chipset that is used in
  the thumper x4500 so you know that the folks at sun are doing their due
  diligence to make sure the drivers are solid.

 Except the drivers _aren't_ solid, at least in Solaris(tm). The
 OpenSolaris drivers may have been fixed (I know a lot of work is going
 into them, but I haven't tested them), but those fixes have not made it
 back into the supported realm.

 So if you need to run a supported OS, I'd skip the Marvell chips if
 possible, at least for now.

 --
 Carson

 ___
 zfs-discuss mailing list
 zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
 http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] 3ware support

2008-02-12 Thread Lida Horn
Carson Gaspar wrote:
 Tim wrote:
   

   
 A much cheaper (and probably the BEST supported card), is the supermicro 
 based on the marvell chipset.  This is the same chipset that is used in 
 the thumper x4500 so you know that the folks at sun are doing their due 
 diligence to make sure the drivers are solid.
 

 Except the drivers _aren't_ solid, at least in Solaris(tm). The 
 OpenSolaris drivers may have been fixed (I know a lot of work is going 
 into them, but I haven't tested them), but those fixes have not made it 
 back into the supported realm.

 So if you need to run a supported OS, I'd skip the Marvell chips if 
 possible, at least for now.

   
Does this mean that support still has not provided you with working 
code?  I am surprised if
that is true.  I do not know of any reason why this should be the case.  
If you have not
been given fixed code I think you should escalate up the support chain.

Further, if more customers push for getting the latest changes that are 
in OpenSolaris
into Solaris 10, the more likely it is that the individuals responsible 
for evaluating what
should be back ported to Solaris 10 will accept those changes.

Regards and sympathy,
Lida
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] 3ware support

2008-02-12 Thread Rob Windsor
Johan Kooijman wrote:
 Goodmorning all,
 
 can anyone confirm that 3ware raid controllers are indeed not working
 under Solaris/OpenSolaris? I can't seem to find it in the HCL.
 
 We're now using a 3Ware 9550SX as a S-ATA RAID controller. The
 original plan was to disable all it's RAID functions and use justs the
 S-ATA controller functionality for ZFS deployment.
 
 If indeed 3Ware isn't support, I have to buy a new controller. Any
 specific controller/brand you can recommend for Solaris?

3ware cards do not work (as previously specified).  Even in 
linux/windows, they're pretty flaky -- if you had Solaris drivers, you'd 
probably shoot yourself in a month anyway.

I'm using the SuperMicro aoc-sat2-mv8 at the recommendation of someone 
else on this list.  It's a JBOD card, which is perfect for ZFS.  Also, 
you won't be paying for RAID functionality that you're wanting to 
disable anyway.

Rob++
-- 
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __o
Life: [EMAIL PROTECTED]_`\,_
(_)/ (_)
They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance.
   -- Major General John Sedgwick
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] 3ware support

2008-02-12 Thread Carson Gaspar
Tim wrote:
 

 A much cheaper (and probably the BEST supported card), is the supermicro 
 based on the marvell chipset.  This is the same chipset that is used in 
 the thumper x4500 so you know that the folks at sun are doing their due 
 diligence to make sure the drivers are solid.

Except the drivers _aren't_ solid, at least in Solaris(tm). The 
OpenSolaris drivers may have been fixed (I know a lot of work is going 
into them, but I haven't tested them), but those fixes have not made it 
back into the supported realm.

So if you need to run a supported OS, I'd skip the Marvell chips if 
possible, at least for now.

-- 
Carson
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] 3ware support

2008-02-12 Thread Tim
On 2/12/08, Johan Kooijman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Goodmorning all,

 can anyone confirm that 3ware raid controllers are indeed not working
 under Solaris/OpenSolaris? I can't seem to find it in the HCL.

 We're now using a 3Ware 9550SX as a S-ATA RAID controller. The
 original plan was to disable all it's RAID functions and use justs the
 S-ATA controller functionality for ZFS deployment.

 If indeed 3Ware isn't support, I have to buy a new controller. Any
 specific controller/brand you can recommend for Solaris?

 --
 Met vriendelijke groeten / With kind regards,
 Johan Kooijman

 T +31(0) 6 43 44 45 27
 F +31(0) 76 201 1179
 E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ___
 zfs-discuss mailing list
 zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
 http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss



Johan,

A much cheaper (and probably the BEST supported card), is the supermicro
based on the marvell chipset.  This is the same chipset that is used in the
thumper x4500 so you know that the folks at sun are doing their due
diligence to make sure the drivers are solid.

It's also much cheaper than almost all RAID based alternatives to boot.  If
you aren't using the raid functionality, don't waste your money on a raid
card :)

http://www.supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/AoC-SAT2-MV8.cfm

Here's where I purchased mine from, but I'm guessing you are not in the US
and they don't ship to your country of origin.
http://www.ewiz.com/detail.php?p=AOC-SAT2MVc=frpid=84b59337aa4414aa488fdf95dfd0de1a1e2a21528d6d2fbf89732c9ed77b72a4
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] 3ware support

2008-02-12 Thread James C. McPherson
Nicolas Szalay wrote:
 Le mardi 12 février 2008 à 07:22 +0100, Johan Kooijman a écrit :
 Goodmorning all,
 
 Hi,
 
 can anyone confirm that 3ware raid controllers are indeed not working
 under Solaris/OpenSolaris? I can't seem to find it in the HCL.
 
 I do confirm they don't work
 
 We're now using a 3Ware 9550SX as a S-ATA RAID controller. The
 original plan was to disable all it's RAID functions and use justs the
 S-ATA controller functionality for ZFS deployment.

 If indeed 3Ware isn't support, I have to buy a new controller. Any
 specific controller/brand you can recommend for Solaris?
 
 I use Areca cards, with the driver supplied by Areca (certified in the
 HCL)


I'm working on getting arcmsr integrated into OpenSolaris,
and I hope to integrate it into build 87.

The RFE is

6614012 add Areca SAS/SATA RAID adapter driver
PSARC 2008/079 arcmsr SAS/SATA RAID driver

The existing case materials (spec and manpage) should be
visible on www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc


cheers
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp   http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


[zfs-discuss] 3ware support

2008-02-11 Thread Johan Kooijman
Goodmorning all,

can anyone confirm that 3ware raid controllers are indeed not working
under Solaris/OpenSolaris? I can't seem to find it in the HCL.

We're now using a 3Ware 9550SX as a S-ATA RAID controller. The
original plan was to disable all it's RAID functions and use justs the
S-ATA controller functionality for ZFS deployment.

If indeed 3Ware isn't support, I have to buy a new controller. Any
specific controller/brand you can recommend for Solaris?

-- 
Met vriendelijke groeten / With kind regards,
Johan Kooijman

T +31(0) 6 43 44 45 27
F +31(0) 76 201 1179
E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss