Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits

2015-01-05 Thread That One Guy
how much resource does an IP/subnet take? I dont question, BTW, that my setup isnt per hoyle, I had gotten approval for a contract on our network design to help me get things less "manual" but our partner company fucked me on that, I had a long spiel post on that too. on that note, if anybody

Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits

2015-01-05 Thread Ryan Spott
I once did 4050 on a pentium II so ARIN could sniff around and allow us to keep a /20 of a /19. :) 30 minutes to boot that little baby. ryan -- D. Ryan Spott | Iron Goat Networks, llc broadband | telco | colo | community PO Box 1232 / 603 W. Stevens Sultan, WA 98284 360-799-0552 | gtalk:rsp.

Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits

2015-01-05 Thread Josh Reynolds
DeKalb> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> -- *From: *"Bill Prince" *To: *af@afmug.com *Sent: *Monday, January 5, 2015 3:19:24 PM *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits I can not

Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits

2015-01-05 Thread That One Guy
gotten all their info from that episode. >> Including the bit about Kim Jong Un not pooping. Cracked me up. >> >> *From:* Mike Hammett >> *Sent:* Monday, January 05, 2015 2:20 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment l

Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits

2015-01-05 Thread Josh Luthman
their info from that episode. > Including the bit about Kim Jong Un not pooping. Cracked me up. > > *From:* Mike Hammett > *Sent:* Monday, January 05, 2015 2:20 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits > > Honeypots? > > O

Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits

2015-01-05 Thread Chuck McCown
: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits Honeypots? Or if you saw The Interview... Honeydicks are also a thing. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com From: "Bill Prince

Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits

2015-01-05 Thread Mike Hammett
Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits I can not imagine what circumstance would require something like that. On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:09 AM, That One Guy < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com > wrote: lol, no the fortigate limit of 25. I have 94 to put on an interface right now On Mon

Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits

2015-01-05 Thread Bill Prince
I can not imagine what circumstance would require something like that. On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:09 AM, That One Guy wrote: > lol, no the fortigate limit of 25. I have 94 to put on an interface right > now > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Josh Luthman > wrote: > >> More than 255 addresses on

Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits

2015-01-05 Thread Josh Reynolds
What the... josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 01/05/2015 10:09 AM, That One Guy wrote: lol, no the fortigate limit of 25. I have 94 to put on an interface right now On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: More than 255 addresses on ON

Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits

2015-01-05 Thread Josh Luthman
Augh why did you ask Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jan 5, 2015 2:38 PM, "Josh Reynolds" wrote: > Why in the world would you be doing this? > > On January 5, 2015 9:23:16 AM AKST, That One Guy < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote

Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits

2015-01-05 Thread Josh Reynolds
Why in the world would you be doing this? On January 5, 2015 9:23:16 AM AKST, That One Guy wrote: >We recently found that our Fortigates have a limit to the number of IPs >you >can assign to a single interface, pretty low at 20 something. We havent >found a limit in the Imagestreams. > >Is there

Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits

2015-01-05 Thread That One Guy
lol, no the fortigate limit of 25. I have 94 to put on an interface right now On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > More than 255 addresses on ONE interface? > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Mon,

Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits

2015-01-05 Thread Josh Luthman
More than 255 addresses on ONE interface? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:59 PM, That One Guy wrote: > This is a transition on this particular project, moving all the IPs from a > powercode BMU to an interm

Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits

2015-01-05 Thread That One Guy
This is a transition on this particular project, moving all the IPs from a powercode BMU to an intermediary router, but some of our sites could easily exceed this number. On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > 255 until 2.2 kernel which is like a bazillion. I'm sure MT is using

Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits

2015-01-05 Thread Josh Luthman
255 until 2.2 kernel which is like a bazillion. I'm sure MT is using a later version of the kernel. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Bill Prince wrote: > I've never done 20, but I also don't know wha

Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits

2015-01-05 Thread Bill Prince
I've never done 20, but I also don't know what it would be. Usually when we are doing more than a couple, it is a transition kind of thing while we are preparing a new link or something. On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:23 AM, That One Guy wrote: > We recently found that our Fortigates have a limit to

[AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits

2015-01-05 Thread That One Guy
We recently found that our Fortigates have a limit to the number of IPs you can assign to a single interface, pretty low at 20 something. We havent found a limit in the Imagestreams. Is there a limit on Mikrotik? -- All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts y