It's not just - oh now I recognize a pattern and can predict the next few
items. It's oh I see and understand numerous patterns all intermeshed and
have a rich knowledge base of raw and processed pattern data...and my
operators are patterns, etc.. Most stuff in the universe is patterns, but
all i
Well SIP is an RFC - RFC3261 with numerous associated RFC's. Also SIP has
wide acceptance and can operate over various transports like it can do TCP,
UDP, TLS even RS232 if you wanted it to. And SIP establishes the connection
for RTP which is another RFC with many variants. RTP also has wide QOS bi
I don't know what the state of the art is in say facial recognition but I
assume it is getting pretty good as is speech rec, handwriting recognition,
etc.. but these are tailored solutions in specific domains. The progress of
speech rec over the years, very resource intensive. 10 years ago the
hard
Steve,
On 5/16/08, Stephen Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I naively expect misunderstandings and ignorance on the part of the user
> to be reconciled via clarification dialog.
>
What else is there besides misunderstandings and ignorance on the part of
the user? Is there something else for c
Hi Steve, thanks for responding to my post.
I naively expect misunderstandings and ignorance on the part of the user to be
reconciled via clarification dialog. Perhaps you accomplish this via regular
expressions applied to the user's input. In my ideal system, constructions
serve the functio
Matt,
On 5/16/08, Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Steve Richfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > *Does anyone else here share my dream of a worldwide AI with all of the
> > knowledge of the human race to support it
>
> Yes
>
> > - built with EXISTING Wikipedia
>
> No. Wikipedia
Steve,
The missing and apparently impossible to reconstruct information, without
which your plan cannot hope to succeed in doing what I am doing (though you
might have different achievable goals), is a syntactical expression of what
people typically say that indicates that they do NOT understand t
Mike,
On 5/16/08, Mike Tintner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Briefly, my thought re a super-medi-wiki is that it only presents
> theories/contenders rather than definitive answers - and there must be some
> ratings/voting system.Yes that favours conservative thinking which may
> become out-of-da
Will,
I have read and reread your posting and still there are some ambiguities in
your meaning. Hence, I will presume (perhaps wrongly) to understand what you
are saying and respond. If I misunderstood, then please feel free to correct
me...
On 5/16/08, William Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi John, good to hear from you.
I appreciate your comment regarding Skype. At this point I can only imagine
the message-passing characteristics of a massively distributed agent hierarchy.
As the Texai use cases become more fleshed-out, it may very turn out that
telephony protocols (e.g. e
John,
I welcome you or anyone else replying, but you're essentially saying "It can be
done" without offering any recognition of the problem, or any attempt at
targeting a solution, just in the end blind faith - "give it enough bandwidth
and there'll be an algorithmic solution."
Perhaps the
There are ways that you could use SIP and RTP. I'm not advocating it but it
is something that has crossed my mind many times. The conclusion that I've
arrived at is a custom protocol modeled after telephony protocols since
usurping existing ones can be a major PIA. But Skype does look good and they
Mike,
It's not all "geometric". Patterns need not be defined by vector' lines, or
only magnitudes of image properties. The same recognition mechanisms in the
brain are emulatable by mathematical, indexable, categorizable, recognizable
and systematic, engineered processes. Even images of Madonn
2008/5/16 Steve Richfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Does anyone else here share my dream of a worldwide AI with all of the
> knowledge of the human race to support it - built with EXISTING Wikipedia
> and Dr. Eliza software and a little glue to hold it all together?
>
I'm taking this as a jumping off
I had said:
> But this means that you are
> advancing a purely speculative theory without any evidence to support
> it.
Matt said:
The evidence is described in my paper which you haven't read yet.
I did glance at the paper and I don't think I will be
Steve,
Briefly, my thought re a super-medi-wiki is that it only presents
theories/contenders rather than definitive answers - and there must be some
ratings/voting system.Yes that favours conservative thinking which may become
out-of-date. But users will still look for "outsider" ideas, and it
--- Steve Richfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *Does anyone else here share my dream of a worldwide AI with all of the
> knowledge of the human race to support it
Yes
> - built with EXISTING Wikipedia
No. Wikipedia has the right idea that it reflects a consensus of
knowledge with instant pe
If your AGI project supports a formal language (FL) communication, I
would be interested to see how would be the following sentence
expressed in that FL:
"John said that if he knew yesterday what he knows today, he wouldn't
do what he did back then."
Thanks,
Jiri Jelinek
PS: Sorry if similar stu
Steve Richfield said:
Does anyone else here share my dream of a worldwide AI with all of the
knowledge of the human race to support it - built with EXISTING Wikipediaand
Dr. Eliza software and a little glue to hold it all together?
Hi Steve,
I share part of your dream, in that I am strongly a
Mike,
On 5/15/08, Mike Tintner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> Steve/MT:
>> My off-the-cuff thought here is that a central database, organised on some
>> open source basis getting medical professionals continually to contribute
>> and update, which would enable people to immediately get a
Mike, Stan, et al,
I have recently had some interesting off-line discussions that may be
pulling things together, so I thought that I would run the emerging
concept up the flagpole here and get any opinions.
I have previously posted here the horrific problems trying to deal with the
Wiki people,
--- Jim Bromer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Original Message
>
> From: Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I don't claim that compression is simple. It is not. Text compression
> is
> AI-complete. The general problem is not even computable.
>
> ...I claim that compression can be
Unsolicited, specially for me personally, today:
Artificial General Intelligence (Cognitive Technologies)
by Ben Goertzel
RRP: £46.00
Price: £30.36
You Save: £15.64 (34%)
Rate this item:
I own it
- Original Message
From: Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I don't claim that compression is simple. It is not. Text compression is
AI-complete. The general problem is not even computable.
...I claim that compression can be used to measure intelligence. I explain in
more detail at h
24 matches
Mail list logo
