esults...
That said, what would people be interested in experimenting with in the near
future? Economics? Internomic relations? Or something other than what I can
think of off the top of my head?
--
Joshua Boehme
ck, so it's possible e is still defined to some degree in relation to
those.
...meaning e could cause a series of CFJs as soon as e registers. It seems
very Agoran, somehow...
Joshua Boehme
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:50:02 -0500
Pavitra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 23 October 2008 11:03:50 pm Sgeo wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Ed Murphy
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > May I host the Agoran Coat of Arms, or may I link to your copy, or
> > should I jus
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:14:29 -0500
Pavitra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Our Bards are Three! Let's celebrate
> And not this moment shun --
> Proposal, "Poet Laureate",
> AI and II 1:
> {
> [Ordain an Office for us who'll
> Ensure that prose stays not the same.]
> At Power 1, create a Rule,
> "The
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 20:33:10 -0700
"Ian Kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I CFJ on the statement, "The proposal submitted by root at or around
> Wed, 5 Nov 2008 22:03:48 UTC has been distributed."
>
> Arguments:
>
> The proposal was submitted with this title:
>
> {{{
> 2001
>
Before I started working on some protos, I wanted to get a feel for people's
opinions. There's not much point in taking the trouble to rewrite sections of
the rules if people are still enjoying them. Thus, I am wondering: what aspects
of the ruleset do people still enjoy or are still playing ar
On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 19:49:16 +
Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8 Nov 2008, at 19:14, Sgeo wrote:
>
> > Might I point out that if they were to invade us with a sufficiently
> > large invasion force, Agora would lose, badly, in weeks?
>
>
> You serious? I doubt half of them could
Proto-proto: The Philanthropist
There shall exist an office knowns as the Philanthropist. Eir duties shall
include organizing non-mandatory ways for Agorans to collectively contribute to
the extra-Agoran world.
Some possible ideas would be making artistic creations that non-Agorans could
appr
On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 21:21:04 -0600
Pavitra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 08 November 2008 08:50:51 pm comex wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2252
> > > ==
On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:23:40 -0500
comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 9:38 AM, The PerlNomic Partnership
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This distribution of proposal 5948
>
> By the way, am I the only one getting sick of these super-frequent
> distributions?
No.
Could we
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:03:51 +
Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 12:58 -0700, Roger Hicks wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 19:32, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > [Don't want to be bound by contests broken when equity dies Unfortunate
> > >
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:03:02 +
"Elliott Hird" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/11/17 Joshua Boehme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > The question is, does the "so" in the second sentence refer to
> > "deregister[ing]" or to "d
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:04:19 -0500
"Geoffrey Spear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This message serves to initiate the Agoran Decision to choose the
> holders of the IADoP and Tailor offices. The eligible voters are the
> active players and the vote collector is the IADoP.
>
> For IADoP, the valid
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:47:59 -0500
Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2008/11/17 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> CoE:
> >>
> >> This is missing most of the votes that were cast on this proposal.
> >>
> >> I inte
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:34:20 -0500
Joshua Boehme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:33:56 -0800
> Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > For each of the 100 partnerships P1 through P100, I intend (with
> > Agoran consent) to deregist
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:50:34 +
Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Warrigal wrote:
> > This proposal would destroy much of Agora, including the part I tend
> > to participate in the most, and it would severely disrupt the economy
> > if there were an economy, but I'll vote FOR it anyw
(This is NOT a proposal, as there is a pending CFJ on this matter. Comments on
the wording would be welcome.)
Allow Changes to Voting Limits on Ordinary Decisions (AI=2)
Amend rule 2156 (Voting on Ordinary Decisions) by appending the
following paragraph:
Other rules may specify methods
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:21:06 -0800
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why make it different than 30-days due to normal deregistration? Facing
> > this, I'd personally just write an equally pissed-off letter followed by
>
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:31:06 -0800
Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> == CFJ 2271 ==
>
> None of the attempted registrations (P1 through P100) in comex's
> quoted message were succesful.
>
> ===
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:41:11 -0500
comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cause Rule 1367 to amend itself by adding the following historical
> annotation:
> {
> Note: comex CAN, and has been able to for the past several months,
> cause this rule to amend itself by announcement.
> }
Annotations !=
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:31:06 -0800
Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Caller's Arguments:
>
> Rule 869 states in part:
>
> A player CAN deregister by announcement. E CANNOT register
> within thirty days after doing so.
>
> The question is, does the "so" in the second sentence r
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:03:20 -0800
Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> root wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I intend, with 2 support, to make Proposals 5956 and 5962 democratic.
> >
> > I support. With 2 support, I make Proposals 5956 a
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:24:52 -0500
"Jamie Dallaire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cross posting because I figure there could be interest on both sides. If
> need be this can be a Werewolves-like endeavour.
>
> Would anyone be interested in playing the following, based on Robert
> Axelrod's and WD
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:09:13 -0700
"Roger Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 19:19, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I intend, with the support of the people, to amend the PBA by
> > replacing section 17 with:
> > {{
> > 17. Every midnight (UTC) that the PBA ha
On 23 Nov 2008 00:00:16 -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I PBA-deposit all the assets I recently withdrew in the message titled
> "Bank run, part 1" (I believe this gets me ^667).
Until woggle's amendment is adopted, I encourage all Comrades to deposit large
quantities of assets close to midnigh
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:06:48 -0700
"Roger Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 07:23, Joshua Boehme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > (Again, these are maximally severable, and my Coin and Chit estimates are
> > provided only fo
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:13:34 -0500
Joshua Boehme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:06:48 -0700
> "Roger Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 07:23, Joshua Boehme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
>
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:50:00 -0700
"Ian Kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Joshua Boehme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 23 Nov 2008 00:00:16 -
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> I PBA-deposit all
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:59:44 +
Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CFJ: The PRS is a contest
>
> Arguments:
>
> neat, PRS isn't a contest; Notary is recordkeepor of
> contestmasters so ratifying the Scorekeepor report didn't make it a
> contest.
> and since the Scorekeepor report
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:24:37 +
Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 30 Nov 2008, at 16:41, Taral wrote:
>
> > AGAINST (scammable)
>
> how?
>
I just told my dog that I purported to ratify a document. (No, not really, but
that illustrates one of the problems.)
--
Elysion
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 01:14:38 +
"Elliott Hird" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 04/12/2008, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:52, Jamie Dallaire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> Figured some of you might be interested to know about the current
> >> political
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:16:41 -0700
"Roger Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend, without three objections, to amend the Vote Market agreement
> as follows:
> {
> Insert after the first sentence of section 2:
> {{
> Ownership of Vote Points is restricted to persons.
> }}
> Upon the adoption o
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:59:20 -0700
"Roger Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 16:43, Joshua Boehme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:16:41 -0700
> > "Roger Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:28:32 +
Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10 Dec 2008, at 20:26, Roger Hicks wrote:
>
> > As required by this sentence I destroy one coin in my possession.
>
>
> I would recommend judges to fine more like 10 coins in future, 1 coin is
> near-worthless.
It'
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:51:22 -0500
comex wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Joshua Boehme wrote:
> > This judge sees no reason why the statement in question ("I make Proposal X
> > democratic") should be considered ambiguous when similar statements about
>
A pretty self-explanatory subject line...
--
Elysion
Nostalgic curiosity brings me to check in on Agora, only to find myself
(Elysion) branded a fugitive! This injustice cannot be permitted to continue,
and I demand satisfaction in the most Agoran way possible: a pedantic logical
argument.
(The statements here are true to the best of my knowl
37 matches
Mail list logo
