On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:09:08 +0200, Martin Truebner
wrote:
>Jim,
>
>>> That's not quite true. <<
>
>I do understand what you said. Would Peters stmt be "full*" true
>if a "problem state instructions..." is inserted?
>
>
>* I used "full" to remove/nullify/void/falsify your use of the word
>"qu
Jim,
>> That's not quite true. <<
I do understand what you said. Would Peters stmt be "full*" true
if a "problem state instructions..." is inserted?
* I used "full" to remove/nullify/void/falsify your use of the word
"quite". If this is wrong, I blame it on my lack of knowledge of the
ameri
Peter Relson/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS wrote on 10/13/2011 08:08:01 AM:
> 10/13/2011 07:35 PM
> Subject:
> Re: newer opcodes
> It is true that all z/OS releases can run on any z/Architecture-capable
> machine.
>
> Peter Relson
> z/OS Core Technology Design
That's not
On 10/13/2011 5:27 AM, Martin Truebner wrote:
Peter,
simple rule of thumb:
Talking about simple... would it be too much asking to insert (right
behind the note about operation exception when not installed) the
corresponding bit in STFLEs answer?
I agree. This would be a useful addition to th
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:52:31 -0400 Mike Shaw wrote:
> We started doing this exact thing in MVS/QuickRef's
> Assembler-oriented data base content. It does save time when you
> don't have to go hunt down the STFLE bits.
A good example of that little "extra" that ISVs (and PCMs in another
time) have
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Martin Truebner wrote:
> Peter,
>
> >> simple rule of thumb:
>
> Talking about simple... would it be too much asking to insert (right
> behind the note about operation exception when not installed) the
> corresponding bit in STFLEs answer?
>
>
Marty:
We started do
Peter,
>> simple rule of thumb:
Talking about simple... would it be too much asking to insert (right
behind the note about operation exception when not installed) the
corresponding bit in STFLEs answer?
--
Martin
Pi_cap_CPU - all you ever need around MWLC/SCRT/CMT in z/VSE
more at http://www.pi
It is true that all z/OS releases can run on any z/Architecture-capable
machine.
That leads to a very simple rule of thumb: if the principles of operation
shows for an instruction that an operation exception may occur, then you
may not use that instruction unless you have determined that the requi
Everything has been said already.
>> [Aside: No facility in recent memory has been more liberating to our
>> programmers
than the relative-immediate facility.]
Y E S.
--
Martin
Pi_cap_CPU - all you ever need around MWLC/SCRT/CMT in z/VSE
more at http://www.picapcpu.de
On 2011-10-12 12:22, Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 10/12/2011 5:08 AM, Tony Thigpen wrote:
Our customers base is VSE. We have customers that are running (in
production) old levels back as far as VSE 2.1. We have customers running
hardware as far back as MP2000 boxes. Until last year, we actually had a
On 10/12/2011 5:08 AM, Tony Thigpen wrote:
Our customers base is VSE. We have customers that are running (in
production) old levels back as far as VSE 2.1. We have customers running
hardware as far back as MP2000 boxes. Until last year, we actually had a
VSE 1.4 customer. When you consider the fa
Our customers base is VSE. We have customers that are running (in
production) old levels back as far as VSE 2.1. We have customers running
hardware as far back as MP2000 boxes. Until last year, we actually had a
VSE 1.4 customer. When you consider the fact that some of our customers
are running no
>Not evil, just can't use them since the customer may not have the
>hardware support. The current program I am working on requires z/VSE 4
>so I was attempting to use some of the halfword-imm stuff. I just picked
>the wrong instructions. So, again, back to using old instructions.
I'm curious. Are
Tony Thigpen noted...
> We have the following HLASM installed:
> HLASM R5.0 2011(PTF UK31916)
Tony, HLASM 5.0 has been off service for over a year; upgrade to HLASM 6.0.
> And I thought that even rel+imm are evil (at least that was the
> impression you left me with after our last conversaation about this
> very subject)
Not evil, just can't use them since the customer may not have the
hardware support. The current program I am working on requires z/VSE 4
so I was
Tony,
>> ZS4 does not work on our HLASM.
But ZS4 is what you need. THe instructions you cited are all z10 (or
more)
>> First, what is the correct OPTABLE() setting for these
>> instructions?
answered
>> Second, I thought the halfword-Imm instructions were available all
>> the way back to the M
ctobre 2011 12:02
À : ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Objet : newer opcodes
I do my major coding on my pc using the Dignus Assembler. I was moving
some working source code to z/VM where production assemblies are
performed and am having trouble finding the correct optcode table for
the following instruction
I do my major coding on my pc using the Dignus Assembler. I was moving
some working source code to z/VM where production assemblies are
performed and am having trouble finding the correct optcode table for
the following instructions:
CHSI
MVHHI
CHHSI
We have the following HLASM installed:
HLASM R
18 matches
Mail list logo