y station is Queen's Park and it is a 5 minute walk
west on College or take the streetcar two stops to St. George.
There is a campus map available on the web at
http://www.osm.utoronto.ca/map.
If you require additional information, please contact Simon Ditner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, or mys
, but if quality (or even just the *feeling* of quality) is
important, this phone will serve well.
The IP500 is a similar phone with more line appearances, a higher
resolution display, full handsfree (Polycom-quality) and PoE. The IP500
has been favorably compared to the Cisco 7940.
Cheers,
--
anyone off. It's just that the crowd in
here is pretty passionate. Kinda like a team of drunken Canadian hockey
players; friendly, but you'd never know it cause they're so dangerous.
Welcome to Asterisk-Users
--
Jim Van Meggelen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
No virus found in this outgoing
ephony" then? I'm betting no.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Jim Van Meggelen
> Sent: Jueves, 10 de Marzo de 2005 12:17 a.m.
> To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
> Subj
r list than trying to include every US and CDN
NPA.
Try nanpa.com
This might help:
http://www.nanpa.com/nas/public/npasInServiceByLocationReport.do?method=
displayNpasInServiceByLocationReport
--
Jim Van Meggelen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Vir
Migrate to a new chassis.
Asterisk changes all the rules. Therfore, to understand it, you have to
adopt a new way of thinking about telecom systems.
Welcome to Asterisk!
--
Jim Van Meggelen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG
ly blindingly obvious… but my techies have gone home
> for the evening and I was looking for an answer before I left.
You could do that with two tin cans and a string! ;-P
In all seriousness, the answer to your question is: yes, Asterisk can
do that, and a whole lot more.
Cheers,
--
Jim Van M
Thanks as always to everyone who provided feedback. It was most helpful!
Regards,
Jim.
--
Jim Van Meggelen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I would like to start a discussion centred around the various
> ways one might serve up configuration files from an Asterisk
>
have been deprecated, and it does not appear to be actively maintained.
Is TuX the way to go?
As for tftpd and ftpd, I'm just not sure. Leightweight is the key, here.
Thoughts, opinions, experiences?
Thanks,
Jim.
--
Jim Van Meggelen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
No virus found in this outgoing m
three issues make this setup completely useless for that!
Yep. You need to try and find a VMI if you can. It's designed for
voicemail integration (although you still won't get the CLID).
Jim.
--
Jim Van Meggelen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
No virus found in this outgoing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've added an introduction article about the ARA on my web
> site http://www.voip-forum.com/
>
> The same text is now also added to CVS head as
> README.realtime. On the same site, you will also find the
> news item about how we used
> Asterisk for a call from an airline
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I didn't realize that the stable branch was never added to...
> So it will NEVER have any more features than it currently has???
1.0 STABLE will never have any more features.
1.2 STABLE will be released in the next 3 to 6 months, and it will
include all features that ha
,SendDTMF(${ARG1})
exten => s,4,Hangup()
Good luck!
Jim.
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Jim
> Van Meggelen Gesendet: Freitag, 25. Februar 2005 05:57
> An: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Comme
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 00:50 +0100, Mateo Meier wrote:
>> Hey Guys
>>
>> Im trying to forward a call with asterisk to a regular phone.
>>
>> Something like " I get a call on my regular phone, and he's trying to
>> reach some buddy of mine.. then I tell him "wait a sec" a
systems
can be sealed up much easier, and having no moving parts makes them
easier to ruggetize.
This is just a brainstorm, so all thoughts are welcome.
TIA,
Jim.
--
Jim Van Meggelen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Vir
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Yep, that's a possibility, but it's rather more kludgy than I'd
>>>> like. (heck, the chann
OR WANNABE NEWBIES!!! (that oughta stir things up)
--
Jim Van Meggelen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Andrew Kohlsmith
> Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 1:39 PM
> To: 'Asterisk Use
Title: Message
Just plug
it in. The RJ11 is narrower than the RJ48, but has the exact same connection
mechanism. it'll fit perfectly (the centre two pins are the
contacts)
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 11:47 -0500, Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
>> Well, I appreciate everyone's input, and I'll give the matter some
>> more thought.
>>
>> Just so no one stays up at night worrying, this is not a situation I
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
>
>> Yep, that's a possibility, but it's rather more kludgy than I'd like.
>> (heck, the channel bank and T1 is more kludgy than I'd like - an
>> integrated card would be my preference).
>
> I
o everyone for their feedback.
Regards,
Jim.
--
Jim Van Meggelen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Folks,
>
> In light of all the troubles people report when running more
> than one TDM400 card in a system, I wouldn't mind hearing
> what your solution of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 20 Feb 2005, at 16:22, Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> If you have a TDM card already, buying a T1, channelbank, etc. to
>>> add a few lines is the stupidest thing I've heard of today.
>>
>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On February 20, 2005 09:25 am, Michael Giagnocavo wrote:
>> Sorry, I understood the O.P. already had the hardware bought and
>> installed and simply wanted to throw on an extra line.
>
> You understood correctly;
Uh, nope. I've been unclear. It was a purely hypothetica
OTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Jim Van Meggelen
> Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 8:39 PM
> To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] A bit of a survey: What do do
> if you needmorethan 4 C.O
st and
> cleanest solution that I know of.
>
>
> Jon.
>
>
> On Friday 18 February 2005 09:21 am, Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> In light of all the troubles people report when running more than one
>> TDM400 card in a system, I wouldn't mind hearing
them into the Wiki, as
I figure this could be useful knowledge for the community.
TIA,
Jim.
--
Jim Van Meggelen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.8 - Release Date:
one would serve, but I can't
find anything in the list archives or Wiki with clues as to how this
might be achieved.
Any advice would be appreciated.
Cheers,
Jim.
--
Jim Van Meggelen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There is no colon the filename below.
Exactly. But there *is* (or rather *was*) in the filename you told it
you wanted to write.
Where'd it go?
> --- Jim Van Meggelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> You are using ille
OK, forget I said that. Wrong side of my brain.
Still, it is funny that it truncates the filename at the colon.
These lines are suspicious:
CLI>ast_writefile: No such format
'wav|rec_to_448704386865_at_16022005-16'
Where'd the ":56:35" on the end go? Also, why is is trying to set the
format to
You are using illegal characters in your file name.
See this line in your output?
> ast_writefile: No such format 'wav|rec_to_448704386865_at_16022005-16'
It can't get past it because the colon is not a valid filename
character.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been attempting to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Nortel i2004 spec is available here.
>
> http://www.nortelnetworks.com/products/library/collateral/i2004.pdf
>Documentation implies H.323 and MGCP interoperability.
I'd love to know where to get the firmware for that.
>I am not sure
>of the nature of the relationshi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Carl Sempla schrieb:
>> On Monday, 14 February, 2005 02:30 : George Cohn
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Stefan Gofferje wrote:
>>>
Hi folks,
has anybody knowledge about the Nortel i2004? Nortel calls it
"Internet Phone". I'm curious, wh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Stefan Gofferje wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> has anybody knowledge about the Nortel i2004? Nortel calls it
>> "Internet Phone". I'm curious, which protocols it may understand...
>
> I just came back from a Nortel roadshow and was told it's H.323.
That's one of the things
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Maybe I have just been looking on the wrong pages but there is a
> question that is very important for me. I already studied some
> Demo-Dialplans and made some basic experiences with Asterisk.
> But what I
> need to find out is how I can handle this.
>
> I am l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I was working yesterday and after I provide my IAXy box it loose any
>>> network comunication, the link light (green) is on and the activity
>>> light (orange) when the power is turned on it does
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I was working yesterday and after I provide my IAXy box it
> loose any network comunication, the link light (green) is on
> and the activity light (orange) when the power is turned on
> it does nothing, but when I pickup the phone connected to the
> box,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm just wondering how other people cost/charge for * boxes
> they have installed in small businesses?
>
> Asterisk is such a complex beast and is capable of so much it
> seems equally complex to figure out a charging model!?
I agree.
> I'm contemplating installi
l.conf
Or, hierarchically:
[Asterisk]
(/etc/asterisk/zapata.conf)
^
|
v
(/etc/zaptel.conf)
[Linux]
Not well explained by the documentation, perhaps, but logical
nonetheless.
Cheers,
Jim.
--
Jim Van Meggelen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-V
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
> I am new here. I am also somewhat new to telephony and IT,
> however, I am technically adept.
That's probably the most important thing with Asterisk.
> I work for a small but growing non-profit in Colorado and I
> wear many hats. Because I am the only one who h
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>
>> Your diagram is a bit confusing to me. Still, the use of PRI in the
>> BCM is a good plan. You've avoided using the highly unstable VoIP
>
t'd do this for you. They've been
supporting T1 data on Linux for years, and they're recently added zapata
to their list of open-source drivers.
Give them a shout, they love this kind of stuff.
Cheers,
Jim
--
Jim Van Meggelen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
No virus found in this outg
Dave Morrow wrote:
> Hi all, I have asterisk installed and working just fine with a couple
> of Cisco IP Phones. I am now ready to pilot connectivity to PSTN and
> am wondering what hardware would be recommended to make minimum
> connectivity to the public telephone network.
Minimum would be an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> does anyone know when current HEAD is scheduled to stabilise? Is
>>> there a plan, or is it still "some time in the future"?
>>
>> I believe I saw an announcement recently that it will start
>> stabilizing in February, with the goal of releasing 1.1 on the
>> six-month
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi community,
>
> does anyone out there made some experience with Varion
> (www.govarion.com) based E1/T1 cards ?
I have no hands on experience with them, but they are based on the
open-source Tormenta card:
www.zapatatelephony.org
With Asterisk, I think any hardware
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am looking at setting up the following configuration and any
> help/input/comments before signing the PRI contracts will be greatly
> appreciated.
>
> PRI Tampa PRI
> Sarasota PRI
> <--> Nortel BCM-->Asterisk<-->Aste
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Are there any VOIP lobbyist groups in Canada?
Well, he's not exactly *in* Canada, but there's Jeff Pulver:
http://www.crtc.gc.ca/ENG/transcripts/2004/tt0922.htm
He seems to be about all we've got, thus far.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
>
>> I had always thought that the difference between STABLE and HEAD
>> *was* the stability. Not so much stability in terms of code, but
>> more in terms of features and compatibility. Is that not the same
>> num
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
>
>> So 1.0.x STABLE will become 1.2.0 STABLE, and 1.1.x HEAD will be
>> continued as 1.3.0 HEAD
>>
>> Could be wrong, but it'd make sense.
>
> It would make sense if we ever did unstable releases fr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
>
>> does anyone know when current HEAD is scheduled to stabilise? Is
>> there a plan, or is it still "some time in the future"?
>
> I believe I saw an announcement recently that it will start
> stabilizing in February, with the goal of relea
Title: Message
www.voip-info.org
www.asteriskdocs.org
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vassili
GontcharovSent: January 24, 2005 5:13 AMTo:
asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSubject: [Asterisk-Users] PSTN and
Asterisk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I am considering A101/102/104 cards for my asterisk
> installations. Has any of you used these or any Sangoma cards
> in such environment? Any thoughts? How do they stack up
> against Digium cards? Any input would be greatly appreciated. robert
The Sangoma cards ar
d
> love to know if anyone has knowledge of any organization that
> might maintain such stats.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jim.
>
>
> --
> Jim Van Meggelen
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Versio
Regards,
Jim.
--
Jim Van Meggelen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.2 - Release Date: 21/01/2005
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.
Title: Message
I tested
this as well and found the same thing.
I
have submitted a bug report:
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0003394
That
one's severe enough that I have flagged it as a major. On a busy system, this
bug could cause all kinds of messages to go missing,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Low bandwidth
>> Low CPU utilization
>> Best audio quality
>>
>
> I think you might want to clarify that Best audio quality is in
> relation to other highly compressed codecs. Certainly my (albeit
> limited) experience is that g711 is much more clear than g729.
> Co
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> For a small installation using ITSPs via DSL is G.729 a
> worthwhile exercise? I have G.729 capable SIP phones and my
> ITSPs cupport the codec so I could go end-to-end without
> transcoding. What's call quality like compared to G.711, GSM or iLBC?
Low band
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>>> Would it be considered trolling to start a thread on Cleaning Maple
>>> Syrup off of Dial Pads, or Wiring your Moose for Wi-Fi?
>>
>> Let's not forget the weekly "tooques and telephony" segment, and a
>> review of the best block heaters
Kim Lux wrote:
> I called Telus before Christmas requesting some sort of VOIP
> connection. Here is what I learned:
>
> a) the guy I was talking to never heard of *
That'll change.
> b) they didn't think there was any way that a PC could
> perform the duties of a PBX
He was probably thinking of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On January 17, 2005 04:47 pm, Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
>> LOL. I hadn't thought of it that way. Little vignettes amidst the
>> commercials?
>
> Exactly -- It's precisely why I hang around on linux-elitists
> and a couple
> other o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On January 17, 2005 01:57 pm, Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
>> I'd have a hard time appreciating regulatory challenges in regions
>> that I don't have involvement with, so I assume that the reciprocal
>> is generally true as well. Granted, I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On January 17, 2005 11:42 am, Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
>> Anyhow, I signed up, and am planning to start a thread about the CRTC
>> VoIP deliberations (and the generous act performed there by Jeff
>> Pulver), something I wouldn't feel was app
ur of the list.
As VoIP becomes ubiquitous, the value of regional lists might be less
and less relevant.
Jim.
> -Original Message-----
> From: Jim Van Meggelen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 11:42 AM
> To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Comme
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Please forgive the lack of understanding as of yet but I have
> been trying to follow the mailing list messages over the last
> few days and would like to know if someone could wither point
> me into the right direction or possibly give me a brief
> overvi
art a thread about the CRTC
VoIP deliberations (and the generous act performed there by Jeff
Pulver), something I wouldn't feel was appropriate on Asterisk-Users.
Time will tell how many topics there are to discuss.
The way I see it, a Canadian mailing list will be no different than ou
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> According to CarrierAccess, the Adit 600 uses CAS for voice
> signalling. What is this? This should not be a problem for
> Asterisk? Does the Asterisk server need to reencode CAS into aLaw
> when going to Euro ISDN?
Try this:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk653
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Since i need to run at least 30 FXS-channels, what hardware
> should I use? Both Motherboard etc and FXS-hardware? There
> seems to be only 4-channel cards from digium. Then I would
> need at least 8 cards. 8 FXS-cards + 1 E1-card. What
> motherboard handles this? And to
Title: Message
Is there a
dialtone recording?
I'm
thinking :
exten =>
s,1,background(dial-tone-recording)
exten =>
s,2,goto(,s,1)
I have not
tested this, but I can't see why it wouldn't work. The only problem would be the
lack of a timeout (and possibly a small challenge getting a rec
Rich Adamson wrote:
>>> I'm trying to connect a TDM400P with an FXS module to a Valcom
>>> V-9940 Paging adaptor. This port on the TDM400P was connected to a
>>> 2500 Set and was working I just re-connected it to the Valcom (which
>>> is known to work on a Telco POTS line) and its not picking up.
Peter Svensson wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> I'm trying to connect a TDM400P with an FXS module to a Valcom
>>> V-9940 Paging adaptor. This port on the TDM400P was connected to a
>>> 2500 Set a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I'm trying to connect a TDM400P with an FXS module to a Valcom V-9940
> Paging adaptor. This port on the TDM400P was connected to a 2500 Set
> and was working I just re-connected it to the Valcom (which
> is known to
> work on a Telco POTS line) and its not picki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have Siemens combiset - it can gateway GSM phone to normal
> analog phone. It has output where I can connect regulat analog phone.
That would be an FXS connection.
>
> How can I connect to combiset with Asterisk - via fxo or fxs ?
>
You would need to conne
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Asterisk Users Mailing List -
> Non-Commercial Discussion"
> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 12:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Toronto?
>
>
>> On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 05:40:02 -0500, Jim Van Meggelen
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Anyone in the Toronto area interested in getting together to share notes
and swap war stories?
--
Jim Van Meggelen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.9 - Release Date: 06/01/2005
César Davi Ávila do Nascimento wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I've bought a TDM400P and need some help with configuration. Can you
> tell me what to do ?
>
> I've tried to install and the message below has appeared:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# modprobe zaptel
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# modprobe w
Title: Message
Please put
this in the Wiki (www.voip-info.org). It
is valuable information and will reach a wider audience
there.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: January 3, 2005 1:52
AMTo: aste
pick it
> up. In my
> house, there are a few spots where power isn't the cleanest, so I'm
> certain that I'm getting at least some noise, despite every
> machine is
> fed from their own ups :)
[here he goes again . . .] Are they power-conditioned UPSs?
> Hope that hel
Dorn Hetzel wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 07:23:58PM -0500, Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
>> [...]
>> What if, for example, the TDM400 issues were a cumulative thing? If
>> you had over 6dB of attenuation on the PSTN loop, coupled with
>> greater than 5V potential on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This has been an interesting discussion. I'll chime in with my
> experience here.
>
> I have two servers. One with the cheapest motherboard and athlon
> processor I could find on Newegg.com. The other is a 1999 era
> motherboard with a Via C3 processor, again a bargain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-01-01 at 16:14 -0700, Michael Welter wrote:
>
>> Since you asked, and since I'm well into this bottle of Merlot on
>> New Year's day:
>>
>> 1. Power alarms. WTF does that mean? Wish I had some support docs.
>>
>> 2. On bootup, "Excessive leakage modul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Paul Fielding wrote:
>> Hmmm I could certainly see that being the issue. If it is the
>> issue, though, then I think it's something that needs to be
>> addressed.
>>
>> In my opinion, Digium needs to address it, as well as the whole
>> provisioning via cli thing.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hey gang,
> I'm looking at escaping from a Nortel Meridian CISC system
> to Asterisk/Digium/SIP phones. I'm currently in the testing
> and proof of concept phase. I'm going to need a SIP phone
> and don't want to re-purchase and have "orphans" around.
I've got a few
You need two files to make the zapata stuff work:
/etc/zaptel.conf
/etc/asterisk/zapata.conf
The first one (/etc/zaptel.conf), configures the Linux driver for the
hardware. In theory, you could have another application other than
Asterisk using the zaptel driver.
The second one (/etc/asterisk/za
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On December 21, 2004 08:29 am, Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
>>> 5 Watts per FXS
>>>
>>> They also told me each FXS port would support a REN (ringer
>>> equivalence number) of 5.0, which means that you should be able to
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On December 21, 2004 08:29 am, Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
>> 5 Watts per FXS
>>
>> They also told me each FXS port would support a REN (ringer
>> equivalence number) of 5.0, which means that you should be able to
>> to ring five of the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven
>>> Critchfield Sent: Saturday, 4 December 2004 1:44 AM
>>> To: Ed Greenberg; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
>>> Discussion
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven
>> Critchfield Sent: Saturday, 4 December 2004 1:44 AM
>> To: Ed Greenberg; Asterisk Users Mailing List -
>> Non-Commercial Discussion
>> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi
>
> any chance of making asterisk support these?
>
>http://voipstore.atacomm.com/shops/ViewItem.aspx/27934028032-3835624908
8.htm
According to the manufacturer, they already do:
http://www.ipvolution.com/
Cheers,
Jim.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jim Van Meggelen schrieb:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> - ADSL 1000kBit/s Downstream, 128kBit/s Upstream
>>
>> That upstream bandwitch will need to be managed carefully.
>
> I know.
>
>> If you're using G.7
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Noah, I have been contacted by 2 people but nothing so
> far. If you want to add $500 please email me your details and
> I'll add it to the wiki to co-ordinate this.
>
> I agree I'm really surprised why no one has shown more of an
> interest in video calls on asterisk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Rich Adamson schrieb:
>>> In the past I had problems with the audio over sip. Then I tried the
>>> "-p" Option and increased the memory. Now it is better but not
>>> perfect.
>>>
>>> Are there any more possibilities to increase it more? By now I'm
>>> using a P-II/333.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sorry for the misspelling... Thanks for the replies. I will
> set it up and start playing. This is all very exciting.
> I've been using VoIP as my primary phone but this is going a
> bit further. At the office we have a T1 that is probably
> fairly dead after hours.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am looking to help out my company find a more budget
> conscious but reliable way to hold conference calls between
> 5+ people. 4x a month we hold several hour long conference
> calls during non-business hours. All of the employees have
> high speed internet. Current
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Gents,
>
> Just a passing thought... is there any reason why the ability
> to search the past posts on here isn't switched on?
>
> Just wondered, since it makes much more sense to be able to
> search the old archives if you have a problem, rather than
> ask the same que
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thank you all for your explanations related to my question.
>
> I have one follow-up question though.
>
> When I said that all dsp related stuff has to be handled
> by software within asterisk, I was thinking of
> conferencing at the time.
>
> I mean in order to be abl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> I was posed this question:
>>>
>>> A T1 set up for voice carries 24 conversations on a circuit that is
>>> 1.544 megabits/second. Right?
>>
>> Yes and no. If the T1 is channelized, then yes. If it's a PRI
>> ci
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jim Van Meggelen schrieb:
>
>> You understand. I was kidding a little bit, but yes, I am also
>> wondering just what things can be done to get a slower machine to
>> work as well as possible.
>
> Okay. So lets try.
What are you running
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jim Van Meggelen schrieb:
>
>> Hmmm. I propose that we make your system the list guinea pig! If we
>> can get that one tweaked, there's no telling what alse we can do with
>> Asterisk!
>
> I'm not really sure that I compl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Antony Stone schrieb:
>> On Wednesday 15 December 2004 21:26, Michael Vogel wrote:
>>
>>> Is it a little bit too much for such a machine? What could be the
>>> bottleneck? CPU? Memory? Interrupts?
>>
>> My advice would be to whack in a load more RAM - basically, try to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Bandwidth%20consumption
>
> A T1 set up for voice uses G711 at 64Kbps which at 1.544Mbps
> equals 24 channels. This is also known as a PRI.
No, that is incorrect. PRI is a type of ISDN service that is typically
carried across
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is it correct to say that by design, asterisk wont make use
> of any cards hardware dsp capabilities ?
I think it would be more accurate to say that Asterisk will be able to
connect to ANY type of media device, as long as an Asterisk-compatible
channel has
1 - 100 of 201 matches
Mail list logo
