To avoid ground loops Naim leave the signal ground floating on their pre
and power amps on the assumption that a Naim CD player will be used.
This does tie signal ground to the true ground provided via the power
socket.
As the Transporter does the same, then no problems are anticipated.
I've just
opaqueice;338672 Wrote:
> Try bringing an iphone near any powered-on stereo system (or computer
> speakers, or telephone for that matter). You'll here this annoying dit
> dit ditdit noise when the iphone is downloading data.
>
> Not exactly the same thing we were talking about, but it shows it'
Nonreality;338652 Wrote:
> So what do you hear when you get noise from AC.
Try bringing an iphone near any powered-on stereo system (or computer
speakers, or telephone for that matter). You'll here this annoying dit
dit ditdit noise when the iphone is downloading data.
Not exactly the same thi
DeVerm;338529 Wrote:
> Oh yeah I believe that in a flash and I already wrote a couple times
> that I can't even hear differences between 16/44 and, let's say,
> 192kBps mp3! However, I'm afraid that many audiophiles don't consider
> themselves just "consumers of recorded audio". The last sentence
Phil Leigh;338588 Wrote:
> I have a dual-trace 66 meg scope...
> I'll have a look on the net.
Scan through the timebase-settings so that you get up to at least 10
MHz. It's been at least 10 years since I used a scope... sold mine when
we moved aboard ;-(
Also, HAM shops will sell RF-blocking fi
Nonreality;338652 Wrote:
> So what do you hear when you get noise from AC. I do run filters but
> didn't notice any sound difference but my plasma display improved
> enough to be noticeable. It got rid of the occasional blocks that
> happen on screen changes. Any sound quality that I may have
DeVerm;338529 Wrote:
>
>
>
> Well, it's mine too! What's your favorite? Me: Bowmore 18yr old,
> Tallisker and Lagavullin at a good 3rd place. I have 22 different ones,
> most bought at the actual distilleries in Scotland!
>
> cheers mate,
> Nick.How can you have 22 types on hand? I get up to
Themis;338570 Wrote:
> Sure I can :
>
> False fact #1: An amplifier with 0.1% THD @ 1KHz "sounds worse" or "is
> not as accurate" or whatever else than another amplifier which has
> 0.005% [EMAIL PROTECTED] Both amplifiers having the same S/N ratio and the
> same
> frequency response.
>
> Fals
DeVerm;338540 Wrote:
> I agree with SuperQ that a true-sine, on-line ups is the best solution.
>
> DCtoDaylight: that -is- a 1-box, easy to put in, solution.
>
> Nonreality: I wouldn't hear it as I live on a boat and almost always
> have to make my own AC. Right now we are in a marina and we ha
All the grounds in the system (input/earth, chassis, PCB) tie together
at one point near the power connector. This is standard practice for
audio equipment and generally required for compliance with safety and
EMI law.
I'm not sure what you're saying about the Naim's requirement, but I've
heard a
Does anyone know whether the unbalanced RCA connectors on the
Transporter have their signal ground directly connected to chassis
ground? I use Naim amps wich expect a single 'real' ground connection
at the source end.
Thanks
--
DaveBk
DaveBk...
Transporter, Naim NAC112/NAP150, Monitor Audio S
@DeVerm
Transcoding workaround
mp3 flc * *
[madplay] --output=wave:- --replay-gain=audiophile --attenuate=-0
--very-quiet --bit-depth=24 $FILE$ | [flac] -cs --totally-silent
--compression-level-0 --endian big --sign signed --channels 2 --bps 24
--sample-rate 44100 -
Madplay get at http://www.r
EnochLight;338417 Wrote:
> Nothing like a healthy dose of sarcasm to start the morning off, eh?
> You're in an audiophile forum - you think it's shocking that I would
> recommend a proper archival format as opposed to a lossy one? He
> stated he ripped his CD's so I assumed he still owned them.
Phil Leigh;338581 Wrote:
> Anyway, forget about SACD - let's enjoy the fact we can now get 24//88.2
> downloads - that might be a future to look forward to.
I thought that we had just established that 16/44 was good enough?!
SACD was (again) just an example, your 24/88 download is just the same:
Phil Leigh;338581 Wrote:
> Anyway, forget about SACD - let's enjoy the fact we can now get 24//88.2
> downloads - that might be a future to look forward to.That's my philosophy,
> too. I totally agree. :)
--
Themis
SB3 - Denon 3808 - Sonus Faber Grand Piano Domus
I have a dual-trace 66 meg scope...
I'll have a look on the net.
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...SB3+Stontronics PSU - Altmann
JISCO/UPCI - TACT RCS 2.2X + Good Vibrations S/W - MF
Triplethreat(Audiocom full mods
Phil Leigh;338567 Wrote:
> Well, can these UPS's deliver 3.25 kW of continuous power? I might try
> one that could...
I actually owned a 48 kW version that would just fit into the room... I
see many that would fit your requirements on Amazon, just search it for
UPS and make sure you look at on-l
Themis;338578 Wrote:
> No, SACD was not better, it was simply much cheaper to the consumer.
> First DVD/SACD combos offered the quality of CD players worth 10 times
> the price.. But we couldn't stream audio like we do with SB/TP... And
> thus, online sellers couldn't sell online SACD music. I be
pfarrell;338572 Wrote:
> Phil Leigh wrote:
> > SACD is basically dead outside a few niche areas - and by definition
> > this means it is dead as a mainstream format. Why? - because it just
> > wasn't THAT much better than decent modern 16/44.1.
>
> And many were not any better because they were
Phil Leigh;338565 Wrote:
> SACD is basically dead outside a few niche areas - and by definition
> this means it is dead as a mainstream format. Why? - because it just
> wasn't THAT much better than decent modern 16/44.1.No, SACD was not better,
> it was simply much cheaper to the consumer.
First
honestguv;338218 Wrote:
> I am curious about these pseudo-scientists and inaccurate facts. Could
> you please post an example or two.
>
> Are pseudo-scientists loonies that are unrelated to scientists?Sure I can :
False fact #1: An amplifier with 0.1% THD @ 1KHz "sounds worse" or "is
not as acc
Phil Leigh wrote:
> SACD is basically dead outside a few niche areas - and by definition
> this means it is dead as a mainstream format. Why? - because it just
> wasn't THAT much better than decent modern 16/44.1.
And many were not any better because they were just made from DAT
masters at 16/48kH
Well, can these UPS's deliver 3.25 kW of continuous power? I might try
one that could...
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...SB3+Stontronics PSU - Altmann
JISCO/UPCI - TACT RCS 2.2X + Good Vibrations S/W - MF
Triplet
(Chortle) thinks quietly of all the digital gear in studios since
mid-80's (Eventide, Lexicon etc etc) before the tracks got anywhere
near vinyl oops sorry I meant CD...
Yes early CD's and players were generally rubbish. Now they are both
much better.
SACD is basically dead outside a few niche
DeVerm;338529 Wrote:
> ain't no stopping it anymore as they will reach critical mass after
> which it'll become more popular quickly.
Not a chance. SACD had it's day already and died, RIP. The industry was
pursuing its own interests (trying to introduce a unnecessary DRMed
format) and the public
I agree with SuperQ that a true-sine, on-line ups is the best solution.
DCtoDaylight: that -is- a 1-box, easy to put in, solution.
Nonreality: I wouldn't hear it as I live on a boat and almost always
have to make my own AC. Right now we are in a marina and we have
shore-power. However, we feed t
opaqueice;338303 Wrote:
> http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=14195
>
> So, based on the above (plus more than a century of scientific data on
> psychoacoustics and the physics of audio) I think we can very
> confidently conclude that 16/44 is good enough as a medium for
> consumers of reco
Sikhar, NonReality,
Hold on, hold on... as we're on SB forums we can imply that the people
in this thread claiming to hear the difference between 320-mp3 and flac
are listening on SB in which case things start to make sense to me
and the people with those claims might be right after all! (did
opaqueice;338448 Wrote:
> Amazing, isn't it?
>
> I suspect it's because cables are among the highest margin items they
> sell.
Don't you mean "Peddle"?
--
iPhone
*iPhone*
'Last.FM' (http://www.last.fm/user/mephone)
Media Room:
Transporter, VTL TL-6.5 Signature Pre-Amp, Ayre MX-R Mono's
Nonreality;338354 Wrote:
> I thought we were talking about cables not cars? ;)
Amazing, isn't it?
I suspect it's because cables are among the highest margin items they
sell.
--
opaqueice
opaqueice's Profile: http://f
Yup. Here all the options are on that page.
If you have any other device (e.g. another SB3 or SBR), make sure the
transporter is chosen in the left drop down. The digital loop options
are obviously only shown for the transporter.
Teus
--
Teus de Jong
---
swhite58;335500 Wrote:
> Regarding your second question about pwered speakers, a lot of people on
> this forum recommend the Audioengine 5
>
> http://www.audioengineusa.com/
>
> I can't comment as I haven't heard them. I can't find anyone in this
> city who stocks them.
>
> Shane
Second on t
Nonreality;338375 Wrote:
> This for a shelf system. Yeah that is the first thing you do. Get rid
> of everything you have not knowing what rate that is was ripped at or
> if he even has the albums. It's got to be those damn mp3's doesn't it.
> Tell me Ralph, why didn't get your hackles up abou
Strange, I only have the volume and crossfade submenu in Audio.. Are
you sure the setting must be there?
--
Holland
Holland's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=19849
View this thread: http://foru
sikahr;338379 Wrote:
> Beleive what You want to belive.
>
> On my side, I can hear on my headphones SB generated noise on quiet
> parts when listening mp3 on SB. When using transcoding that noise is
> gone.
>
> That noise is about -60 dB.
>
>
> cheers, NenadWas anything I said not true? The
Beleive what You want to belive.
On my side, I can hear on my headphones SB generated noise on quiet
parts when listening mp3 on SB. When using transcoding that noise is
gone.
That noise is maybe -60 dB.
cheers, Nenad
--
sikahr
---
rksingla;335463 Wrote:
> I spent two days trying everything i could think of, and you all solved
> my problem in like two minutes. I had been using the Phono input not
> knowing that the amp treated that differently from othere input. I
> switched to the Video input and it now sounds great.
So
ralphpnj;335755 Wrote:
> I'm guessing that the "old Sony Shelf system" is more likely from the
> 1980's since back then phono inputs where still quite common. I had and
> still have a very nice Sony mini-system from around the same era but I
> don't remember if it has a phono input. I also think
Go to Setting => tab page Player and choose Audio from the drop down
menu. There you will find the relevant options (Effects loop input and
Effects loop clock mode).
Teus
--
Teus de Jong
Teus de Jong's Profile: http://for
sikahr;338342 Wrote:
> I didn't read this whole thread, but I want to say:
>
> Please don't draw any conclusions about mp3 quality based on experience
> with slimdevices because slimdevices mp3 decoder have flaws/limitations
>
> ( http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6231 ).
>
> cheers,
You have to be kidding here, right? This is something you actually hear
and interferes with you music enjoyment? Yeah and I've been called a
troll.
--
Nonreality
-IF THE RULE YOU FOLLOWED BROUGHT YOU TO THIS, OF WHAT USE IS THE RULE.-
HTTP://www.last.fm/user/nonreality
-
opaqueice;338305 Wrote:
> There are lots of potential problems: high pressure sales tactics,
> false advertising, bait and switch, etc. etc. Many common practices in
> cables selling at least verge on some of those. Whether they actually
> cross the line is not for me to decide, but as I said
I didn't read this whole thread, but I want to say:
Please don't draw any conclusions about mp3 quality based on experience
with slimdevices because slimdevices mp3 decoder have flaws/limitations
( http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6231 ).
cheers,
Nenad
--
sikahr
--
Is there any diff between the DAC on the SB2 and the SB3? I've got an
SB2.
--
GreenMan
My computer -> SB2-> Krell KAV-300i -> pair of Thiel CS2 -> my ears ->
my brain
GreenMan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/memb
44 matches
Mail list logo