Flak Magnet wrote:
> I've been running bacula on solaris since December of '06. It started out as
> a single-box backup solution, with the dir, sd and fd running on a single
> box. Since then we've scaled it up to include a second sd and fd on another
> Sun box, the an fd-only on a ubuntu mach
On 5/14/07, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, I have included a screen shot of the current Bacula. One could easily
> start on the tool bar icons. From left to right, the icons are:
>
> - Connect (connect to director) -- there is a corresponding disconnected icon
> as well.
> - S
Hi
thanks to all those who have guided for my backup to cd.I am still on
it.Can someone tell me if there is any cd+rw+tool available for bacula
just like there is for dvd and where will i be able to get it.
lalitha
Sorry for the delay.
I've got it working finally.
Following your tip, I had to remove the '-u' and '-p' in the script call.
Then I had a write problem :
I'm backing up to /backup and I had to create a /backup/catalog directory
chowned to bacula:bacula. Once done, everything ran smoothly.
Thanks.
Thanks for the tip, Miki.
2007/5/13, Miki Lewinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello Jean,
You need to define a new storage device in the bacula-dir.conf file as
follows, in the DIRECTOR machine:
Director {
Name = first_machine
...
}
Storage {
Name = second_machine
Address = second_machine.com.org
Hi,
On 5/14/2007 5:53 PM, Flak Magnet wrote:
...
> Now, because of the expanding use of bacula, we're going to virtualize the
> director. What kinds of issues might I encounter?
>
> I have already thought of:
>
> With the new name, all configs will have to be tweaked to allow
> communications
Hi,
On 5/14/2007 5:04 PM, Naufal Sheikh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i was running bacula and then went on vacations. In the meantime due to
> some error which required human intervention, bacula just got stuck on
> that job and please correct me if I am wrong bacula does not carry on to
> next jobs if it
Hi,
On 5/14/2007 4:49 PM, Mike Vasquez wrote:
> Why is it that when I go to label tapes, and bacula begins its backup it
> starts on the last tape I labeled?
Quick answer: Because that tape is then in the drive, and thus the first
choice to use for Bacula.
More stuff below...
> Here is the sce
I decided to reboot and the machine to reload all the hardware. It started
to work again. I have other issues now but I have put them in another
thread.
Having problems with Volume labeling
Thanks,
Mike
Arno Lehmann wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 5/11/2007 5:44 PM, Mike Vasquez wrote:
>> Now I am g
After much searching, the answer lay in turning off the Prefer Mounted
Volumes in the job definitions. The default setting does not work for
multiple drives.
The Autochanger_Support.html manual page does not mention this (bug
report filed).
> -Original Message-
> From: John Drescher [
On May 11, 2007, at 11:19 AM, Justin Lott wrote:
> On May 11, 2007, at 10:56 AM, Jorj Bauer wrote:
>
>>> I think I've figured this out. What clue'd me in was you saying
>>> "in a
>>> simple test without PKI" :-)
>>
>> My test yesterday was without PKI. I was thinking about your setup,
>> not
>>
Hi,
>We also have a problem with our PostgreSQL database. A full backup of
>our servers results in probably 50-70 GB of data, which is spooled
>quickly, but it takes about 12 hours of writing the metadata to the
>database. We tried to tune PostgreSQL, but had to turn off fsync to
>get the
I've been running bacula on solaris since December of '06. It started out as
a single-box backup solution, with the dir, sd and fd running on a single
box. Since then we've scaled it up to include a second sd and fd on another
Sun box, the an fd-only on a ubuntu machine, and the fd on a WinXP
On 5/12/07, Jansen,Quinton [PYR] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can someone send me a copy of their storage definitions for a
> multi-drive auto-changer? Bacula 2.0.3 appears to only use one drive,
> even though there are multiple jobs running. The backups are configured
> to go to the auto-changer
Hi,
i was running bacula and then went on vacations. In the meantime due to some
error which required human intervention, bacula just got stuck on that job
and please correct me if I am wrong bacula does not carry on to next jobs if
it get stuck in case of any error. when I do "list jobs" it show
Why is it that when I go to label tapes, and bacula begins its backup it
starts on the last tape I labeled?
Here is the scenario.
I want to relabel some old tapes. So I put tape 1 in slot 1, tape 2 in slot
2 and tape 3 in slot 3. I open the console and do the following commands.
label
Autochan
First of all, this is on a Windows SD, but I was hoping it would work
now. If I'm not doing something dumb I'll probably be abandoning the
Windows SD after this.
The SD rebooted. There may have been a job running when it did, but I
don't think so. Now it says it wants tape #3, which is the o
Arno Lehmann schrieb:
> I'm also not a guru - and even cmpletely inexperienced regarding Bacula
> &TLS - but that would be a bug... It must be possible to tell the DIR to
> only accept console connections initiated by a client which can identify
> itself through TLS. Otherwise, the whole consol
On Thu, 10 May 2007, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> That's what I'm referring to... if you have a file on your client that
> is stamped sometime in 2034, for example, it will be backed up until
> that date regardless if I understand correctly. There does not seem to
> currently be a solution to that (o
Hello,
I'm trying to restore some linux files in a nfs share (where the local
root user can not change ownership) and bacula gives a lot of errors
when restoring the backup, like this one:
04-May 09:48 bckserve02-fd: RestoreFiles.2007-05-04_09.45.53 Error:
Cannot change owner and/or group of /
Hi,
On 5/14/2007 11:59 AM, Michel Meyers wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hi
>> i installed cdrtools-2.01-1.i386.rpm and did the required
>> configuration.I gave the mnt point as /tmp/cd,i did a backup and the
>> data was stored under a di
Hi,
On 5/11/2007 8:15 PM, Radek Hladik wrote:
> Hi,
> is it possible to tell Bacula to check permissions for the tape
> drive before an operation? I've just spent like hour searching why
> bacula is not working :-) Hopefully I've remembered my first Unix lesson
> and checked all the permiss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
> i installed cdrtools-2.01-1.i386.rpm and did the required
> configuration.I gave the mnt point as /tmp/cd,i did a backup and the
> data was stored under a directory cd ,ie ,bacula created a directory cd
> and backed th
Hello, too
yes, i got the same0 problems, too with that type.. px506 + 2 LTO3.
meanwhile i can control the drives seperate without problems. but
unloading tapes for example is like russian roulette.
If someone already got a px506 sample config for that one, whould be great.
Thanks a lot
Janse
Hi,
is it possible to tell Bacula to check permissions for the tape drive
before an operation? I've just spent like hour searching why bacula is
not working :-) Hopefully I've remembered my first Unix lesson and
checked all the permissions. Bacula RPM added user bacula to group disk
but this
Massano,
Thanks for the debugging output, it's exactly what's needed. The
crash-causing logic error was already fixed in subversion by Kern,
and I believe a release is planned soon; As a temporary work-around,
you can set "PKI Signatures = no" in the configuration file when
doing the emer
Hi,
to help getting you a useful answer I send this to the mailing list,
too... it's much more likely you get useful advice there as I'm not very
experienced reagrding TLS in Bacula, and don't have the time to try
things now...
Anyway, some comments are inline.
On 5/10/2007 1:09 PM, alejandr
Hi
i installed cdrtools-2.01-1.i386.rpm and did the required
configuration.I gave the mnt point as /tmp/cd,i did a backup and the
data was stored under a directory cd ,ie ,bacula created a directory cd
and backed the data there.i need to know two things,
1.do i have to burn the data from this dir
Andreas Helmcke a écrit :
> On 14.05.2007 09:40, Adam Cécile wrote:
>
>> All weeks I need to unload all tapes from drives to the library, so all
>> tapes can be removed from the Autochanger easily.
>> However, when I do "umount", device is marked as BLOCKED and no more
>> jobs run until I mount
On 14.05.2007 09:40, Adam Cécile wrote:
> All weeks I need to unload all tapes from drives to the library, so all
> tapes can be removed from the Autochanger easily.
> However, when I do "umount", device is marked as BLOCKED and no more
> jobs run until I mount the drive again.
> What's the right w
Hi,
All weeks I need to unload all tapes from drives to the library, so all
tapes can be removed from the Autochanger easily.
However, when I do "umount", device is marked as BLOCKED and no more
jobs run until I mount the drive again.
What's the right way to eject all tapes without blocking drives
Hi there,
I'm looking for a convenient way to send individual mail reports to
users as soon as his/her particular job(s) have finished. Ideally (for a
non-programmer like me...) this could/should be done by substituting the
recipient's email address variable (%r) defined within a MESSAGE
resource,
32 matches
Mail list logo
