Re: [Bacula-users] {SPAM?} Re: {SPAM?} ULTRIUM-HH6 Block Size Limits with Adaptec 78165 or Other Issue?

I have received a response back from Adaptec about block-size and tape drives. All of their controllers have a hard-limit of 256KB. This is an undocumented limit it appears... On 12/23/2016 05:05 PM, Alan Brown wrote: > On 22/12/16 17:49, Drew Von Spreecken wrote: >> Thank you Alan for the de

Re: [Bacula-users] {SPAM?} Re: {SPAM?} ULTRIUM-HH6 Block Size Limits with Adaptec 78165 or Other Issue?

On 22/12/16 17:49, Drew Von Spreecken wrote: > Thank you Alan for the detailed response. > > I was unaware of the GPL violations, this is an issue for me and it > will be removed promptly. > > The block size I am aiming for was 512KB-1MB and have done extensive > research on tuning. This should als

Re: [Bacula-users] {SPAM?} ULTRIUM-HH6 Block Size Limits with Adaptec 78165 or Other Issue?

Andrew, I will try this tomorrow. Thank you,drewv-- Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training an

Re: [Bacula-users] {SPAM?} ULTRIUM-HH6 Block Size Limits with Adaptec 78165 or Other Issue?

Hi Drew, Try installing IBM's tape driver rather than the default one in the Linux kernel. I have a LTO4 half-height SAS drive and it made a difference in transfer speeds for me. Andrew On 12/22/2016 12:49 PM, Drew Von Spreecken wrote: > Thank you Alan for the detailed response. > > I was unaw

Re: [Bacula-users] {SPAM?} ULTRIUM-HH6 Block Size Limits with Adaptec 78165 or Other Issue?

Thank you Alan for the detailed response. I was unaware of the GPL violations, this is an issue for me and it will be removed promptly. The block size I am aiming for was 512KB-1MB and have done extensive research on tuning. This should also of course be within specification of bacula-sd. Bec

Re: [Bacula-users] {SPAM?} ULTRIUM-HH6 Block Size Limits with Adaptec 78165 or Other Issue?

On 22/12/16 14:31, Drew Von Spreecken wrote: > Greetings, > > I have run into an issue and am looking for input. I have a SAS tape > autoloader with an IBM HH-LTO6 drive running the newest firmware. > It is currently connected to a Adaptec 78165 HBA/Raid controller via SAS. The maximum block size

Re: [Bacula-users] [SPAM] Deleting DIFFERENTIAL Jobs from Volumes

Larrybwoy> Thanks for the replies and good advice. The reason I Larrybwoy> thought of this backup plan is because what I need to back Larrybwoy> up are multiple dynamic file systems from abut 20 Larrybwoy> servers. These file systems contain data that is always Larrybwoy> changing since they conta

[Bacula-users] [SPAM] Fw: new message

Hello! You have a new message, please read e...@gurski.com -- Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep perf

Re: [Bacula-users] SPAM: Re: Restoring Files backed up on Windows Client to FreeBSD Client, files all wrong size.

On 2015-12-02 7:25 am, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 12:29:53PM -0600, dweimer wrote: >> >> I will do some more test restores to the client now that its up, to >> see >> if its only when restoring to the freebsd client. I have verified >> restores to the FreeBSD client of itself

Re: [Bacula-users] SPAM: Re: maximum client file size

On 05/21/2015 10:23 am, Devin Reade wrote: > --On Thursday, May 21, 2015 09:06:41 AM +0200 Kern Sibbald > wrote: > >> Bacula does keep 64 bit addresses. > > Excellent. Not surprisingly, I'm not dealing with file sizes near > 2^63, > but I *do* need to back up files that are in the 2^39 range (

Re: [Bacula-users] ****SPAM(7.5)**** Re: Why bacula does not mark job as failed after "Write error" on tape drive?

On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 11:14:25 +0100 Kern Sibbald wrote: Hello, Kern! Thank you for explanation. And - yes, I do know the difference between "may not" and "not" =) It is a bit strange - at the moment of error bacula "knows" what job is being running but the only warning is in log-file. Of course

[Bacula-users] [SPAM] Re: Problem connecting to fd on client server

Dear Sir/Madam, Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending it to. For more information on our business please click on the following link: Click here for our website We look forward to your continued business in the future. Regards, Webmaster

[Bacula-users] [SPAM] Re: Could not stat some files with Windows-FD (path length problem ?)

Sorry for the long time response but I was away and tried to respond but my mail was spam reported (don't know why). here's what I wrote: Yeah I think my Bacula version is recent enough, I should not have the path length problem. I'm not sure the problem comes from accentuation as there

[Bacula-users] [SPAM] Re: Could not stat some files with Windows-FD (path length problem ?)

Yeah I think my Bacula version is recent enough, I should not have the path length problem. I'm not sure the problem comes from accentuation as there some other files with accent well backed up (and I can restore them). Or maybe long path + accentuation might lead to my problem. -- Tel. F

[Bacula-users] [SPAM] Re: Recycling of volumes in Bacula

Dear Sir/Madam, Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending it to. For more information on our business please click on the following link: Click here for our website We look forward to your continued business in the future. Regards, Webmaster

Re: [Bacula-users] [SPAM] Re: Using HP Storageworks 1/8 G2 with Bacula

On Wednesday, 16 June 2010 07:48:22 +1200, richard wrote: > Alan Brown wrote: > > > A standalone single port SAS card isn't very expensive. It's worth > > trying to see if this is a driver issue. > > I can vouch for this controller, running an LTO4 drive: > > http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cg

[Bacula-users] [SPAM] Re: Using HP Storageworks 1/8 G2 with Bacula

Alan Brown wrote: > A standalone single port SAS card isn't very expensive. It's worth > trying to see if this is a driver issue. I can vouch for this controller, running an LTO4 drive: http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?infotype=an&subtype=ca&appname=redbooks&htmlfid=897/ENUS106-

Re: [Bacula-users] [SPAM]Problem installing bacula 5.0.0

Simplify the configure script. You have everything and the kitchen sink (passwords) specified. Mehma === 2010/2/7 List Man > I have tried several time to install bacula 5.0.0 on a brand new server > and I keep getting this linking error for static-bacula-sd. I don’t know > what else to do. I

[Bacula-users] [SPAM]Problem installing bacula 5.0.0

I have tried several time to install bacula 5.0.0 on a brand new server and I keep getting this linking error for static-bacula-sd. I don¹t know what else to do. I have searched and read the releases and no sugar. See below: Linking bacula-sd ... /usr/bin/g++ -L../lib -o bacula-sd stored.o an

Re: [Bacula-users] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Bacula"TimeMachine"type SOHOconfig?

"Timo Neuvonen" kirjoitti viestissä news:hfjoo9$ks...@ger.gmane.org... > > "Simon J Mudd" kirjoitti viestissä > news:m3fx7mkdv3@mad06.wl0.org... >> timo-n...@tee-en.net ("Timo Neuvonen") writes: >> >>> "Simon J Mudd" kirjoitti viestissä >> >> ... >> >>> > Yes, but that's what I'm trying to

Re: [Bacula-users] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Bacula "TimeMachine"type SOHOconfig?

"Simon J Mudd" kirjoitti viestissä news:m3fx7mkdv3@mad06.wl0.org... > timo-n...@tee-en.net ("Timo Neuvonen") writes: > >> "Simon J Mudd" kirjoitti viestissä > > ... > >> > Yes, but that's what I'm trying to avoid. I realise that I MUST have >> > sufficient >> > space really for at least 2 f

[Bacula-users] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Bacula "TimeMachine" type SOHOconfig?

timo-n...@tee-en.net ("Timo Neuvonen") writes: > "Simon J Mudd" kirjoitti viestissä ... > > Yes, but that's what I'm trying to avoid. I realise that I MUST have > > sufficient > > space really for at least 2 full backups plus some extra for incrementals > > but I don't want to worry about the

Re: [Bacula-users] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Bacula "TimeMachine" type SOHOconfig?

"Simon J Mudd" kirjoitti viestissä news:m3aaxw15sz@mad06.wl0.org... > timo-n...@tee-en.net ("Timo Neuvonen") writes: > >> "Simon J Mudd" kirjoitti viestissä >> news:20091206082523.ga...@mad06.wl0.org... >> > Hello, >> > >> > I've been using Bacula for some time for home use, and trying to ge

[Bacula-users] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Bacula "TimeMachine" type SOHO config?

timo-n...@tee-en.net ("Timo Neuvonen") writes: > "Simon J Mudd" kirjoitti viestissä > news:20091206082523.ga...@mad06.wl0.org... > > Hello, > > > > I've been using Bacula for some time for home use, and trying to get > > a working "TimeMachine" type configuration working. > > > > That is I'd lik

Re: [Bacula-users] [SPAM] Bacula "TimeMachine" type SOHO config?

"Simon J Mudd" kirjoitti viestissä news:20091206082523.ga...@mad06.wl0.org... > Hello, > > I've been using Bacula for some time for home use, and trying to get > a working "TimeMachine" type configuration working. > > That is I'd like to configure bacula to store to an external hard disk > using

[Bacula-users] [SPAM] Bacula "TimeMachine" type SOHO config?

Hello, I've been using Bacula for some time for home use, and trying to get a working "TimeMachine" type configuration working. That is I'd like to configure bacula to store to an external hard disk using a number of fixed sizes files, occupying up to a certain amount of disk space. In my case 10

Re: [Bacula-users] ***SPAM*** Re: Dell TL2000 library control

Le jeudi 11 juin 2009 à 13:04 +0200, Arno Lehmann a écrit : > Which user does the SD run as? > bacula-sd runs as 'bacula' user : burp:/etc/bacula# ps x aux|grep sd bacula 19313 0.0 0.0 89768 2292 ?Ssl 06:17 0:00 /usr/sbin/bacula-sd -c /etc/bacula/bacula-sd.conf -u bacula -g tape

Re: [Bacula-users] SPAM-LOW: Re: incremental backup of hard links

On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Ingo Jochim wrote: > Hi Dan, > > a hard link looks like the original file. So it always should have the > same date. > Below you will see that the hard link (second line) has the same date at > the "original" file. > I created the hard link today but it also has the date from

Re: [Bacula-users] SPAM-LOW: Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: incremental backup of hard links

C M Reinehr schrieb: > On Wednesday 16 January 2008 09:49, Ingo Jochim wrote: > >> C M Reinehr schrieb: >> >>> On Wednesday 16 January 2008 08:54, Ingo Jochim wrote: >>> Dan Langille schrieb: > Reply has been rearranged to retain chronological order. >

Re: [Bacula-users] SPAM-LOW: Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: incremental backup of hard links

On Wednesday 16 January 2008 09:49, Ingo Jochim wrote: > C M Reinehr schrieb: > > On Wednesday 16 January 2008 08:54, Ingo Jochim wrote: > >> Dan Langille schrieb: > >>> Reply has been rearranged to retain chronological order. > >>> > >>> On Jan 16, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Ingo Jochim wrote: > Dan L

Re: [Bacula-users] SPAM-LOW: Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: incremental backup of hard links

C M Reinehr schrieb: > On Wednesday 16 January 2008 08:54, Ingo Jochim wrote: > >> Dan Langille schrieb: >> >>> Reply has been rearranged to retain chronological order. >>> >>> On Jan 16, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Ingo Jochim wrote: >>> Dan Langille schrieb: > Ingo Joc

Re: [Bacula-users] SPAM-LOW: Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: incremental backup of hard links

On Wednesday 16 January 2008 08:54, Ingo Jochim wrote: > Dan Langille schrieb: > > Reply has been rearranged to retain chronological order. > > > > On Jan 16, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Ingo Jochim wrote: > >> Dan Langille schrieb: > >>> Ingo Jochim wrote: > I create hard links for the files I want to

Re: [Bacula-users] SPAM-LOW: Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: incremental backup of hard links

Dan Langille schrieb: > Reply has been rearranged to retain chronological order. > > On Jan 16, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Ingo Jochim wrote: > >> Dan Langille schrieb: >>> Ingo Jochim wrote: I create hard links for the files I want to backup so that while I do the backup the files can get deleted

Re: [Bacula-users] SPAM-LOW: Re: incremental backup of hard links

Reply has been rearranged to retain chronological order. On Jan 16, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Ingo Jochim wrote: > Dan Langille schrieb: >> Ingo Jochim wrote: >>> I create hard links for the files I want to backup so that while >>> I do >>> the backup the files can get deleted by someone else. >>> >>>

Re: [Bacula-users] SPAM-LOW: Re: incremental backup of hard links

Hi Dan, a hard link looks like the original file. So it always should have the same date. Below you will see that the hard link (second line) has the same date at the "original" file. I created the hard link today but it also has the date from november the 23th. Ingo [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls

[Bacula-users] [spam] Re: [SOLVED] Where is bat?

Hi, My problem is solved. I downloaded the depkgs-qt-21Aug07.tar.gz file from: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=50727&package_id=44425 Read very carefully the INSTALL file! After make qt4 (takes a very long time) and make qwt, I set the paths described in qt4-paths file. F

Re: [Bacula-users] [SPAM] Re: Single tape drive visible to multiple hosts

Thanks Alan and John Network backups is a possibility, we have an excellent network, I'm just looking for the most efficient solution. Thanks for your help. Regards Alan Alan Brown wrote: > On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, John Drescher wrote: > >> Bacula sends the data directly from the filedaemon on each

Re: [Bacula-users] [SPAM: 8.456] Re: Can't figure out how to use rpmbuild

Brad Peterson wrote: > Hristo Benev wrote: >> Brad Peterson wrote: >>> Hey all, >>> >>> I'm getting stuck trying to install bacula 2.0.0 on a fc5 box. I've >>> decided to try the rpm method of installation this time. I tried to >>> follow the manual ( >>> http://www.bacula.org/dev-manual/Bacula_

[Bacula-users] [SPAM: 8.456] Re: Can't figure out how to use rpmbuild

Hristo Benev wrote: Brad Peterson wrote: Hey all, I'm getting stuck trying to install bacula 2.0.0 on a fc5 box. I've decided to try the rpm method of installation this time. I tried to follow the manual ( http://www.bacula.org/dev-manual/Bacula_RPM_Packaging_FAQ.html ), and when I ran my r

Re: [Bacula-users] [SPAM: 8.456] Can't figure out how to use rpmbuild

Brad Peterson wrote: > Hey all, > > I'm getting stuck trying to install bacula 2.0.0 on a fc5 box. I've > decided to try the rpm method of installation this time. I tried to > follow the manual ( > http://www.bacula.org/dev-manual/Bacula_RPM_Packaging_FAQ.html ), and > when I ran my rpmbuild co

[Bacula-users] [SPAM: 8.456] Can't figure out how to use rpmbuild

Hey all, I'm getting stuck trying to install bacula 2.0.0 on a fc5 box. I've decided to try the rpm method of installation this time. I tried to follow the manual ( http://www.bacula.org/dev-manual/Bacula_RPM_Packaging_FAQ.html ), and when I ran my rpmbuild command, it looks like it's doing i

Re: [Bacula-users] !! SPAM Suspect : SPAM-URL-DBL !! Re: !! SPAM Suspect : SPAM-URL-DBL !! Restore Pb

Sorry for this post. Don't take care of it. Regards Le jeudi 14 décembre 2006 17:28, Arnaud Mombrial a écrit : > I can also give you an ls output of /home/bacula/server-prod where > INC-server-prod.18 is stored : > > -rw-r- 1 bacula-sd bacula 6.9G Dec 14 01:34 INC-server-prod.18 > > Is t

Re: [Bacula-users] !! SPAM Suspect : SPAM-URL-DBL !! Restore Pb

I can also give you an ls output of /home/bacula/server-prod where INC-server-prod.18 is stored : -rw-r- 1 bacula-sd bacula 6.9G Dec 14 01:34 INC-server-prod.18 Is there a permission problem ? Regards. Le jeudi 14 décembre 2006 17:08, Arnaud Mombrial a écrit : > Hi, > > Here is the outp

Re: [Bacula-users] [SPAM: 7.427] labelmedia=yes isn't working

Hello, On 12/7/2006 8:11 AM, Brad Peterson wrote: > I'm trying to set up disk volumes and have them automatically labeled. > According to the manual, this should be possible. It definitely is. > So I made sure my storage daemon had this line in it: > > Label media = yes; #

[Bacula-users] [SPAM: 7.427] labelmedia=yes isn't working

I'm trying to set up disk volumes and have them automatically labeled. According to the manual, this should be possible. So I made sure my storage daemon had this line in it: Label media = yes; # lets Bacula label unlabeled media I then did a ./bacula restart. I then tried

[Bacula-users] [SPAM: 7.427] Re: Could not connect to Storage daemon on bacula:9103. ERR=Operation not permitted

Jon Ingason wrote: I have installed new bacula server 1.38.11 on debian testing/unstable runnig on PC and one of the clients, running on FreeBSD 6.1 version 1.38.5_1, is giving me problem: run job="client-100" fileset="client File Set" level=Incremental client="client-100-fd" pool="client-100" w

Re: [Bacula-users] !! SPAM Suspect : SPAM-URL-DBL !! Fwd: How to understand this error

How to know a job is ended ? Is there a way to tell Bacula to use a compression something for the tape, since they are 1.300 Gbytes capable ? If you are putting more than 500 GB on a tape compression is definitely on. So the question is why don't you get 1.3 TB? The answer is that the drive is

Re: [Bacula-users] !! SPAM Suspect : SPAM-URL-DBL !! Fwd: How to understand this error

Le lundi 4 décembre 2006 15:17, John Drescher a écrit : > -- Forwarded message -- > From: John Drescher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Dec 4, 2006 9:17 AM > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] How to understand this error > To: Arnaud Mombrial <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I'm afraid Things go wrong

[Bacula-users] [SPAM: 7.427] Re: Director cannot start, can't connect to MySQL

John, Thanks for the quick reply. I did do that. I poured over the manaul for hours and google searched multiple times and tried dozens of things. I finally found the answer in a last ditch Google search. http://www.nabble.com/Negative-test-of-bacula-dir.-tf1189188.html#a3228301 I alread

Re: [Bacula-users] spam filters

On Wednesday 05 July 2006 23:04, Dan Langille wrote: > On 5 Jul 2006 at 23:01, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > I'm not really too thrilled about finding, installing, and learning how > > to use another spam filter. > > I use spamassassin, clamav, and postfix. I wouldn't have to learn > another. Yes, well

[Bacula-users] spam filters

On 5 Jul 2006 at 23:01, Kern Sibbald wrote: > I'm not really too thrilled about finding, installing, and learning how to > use > another spam filter. I use spamassassin, clamav, and postfix. I wouldn't have to learn another. -- Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work my resume: h

Re: [Bacula-users] Spam on this list

Kern Sibbald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Well, everyone is entitled to his opinion. And thanks to the internet, we can all express it ;) > In my case, it is not that I cannot be bothered to subscribe as you seem > suggest. This should be obvious from the amount of time and effort I put into

Re: [Bacula-users] Spam on this list

Hello, On Wednesday 18 May 2005 09:37, Matthew Hawkins wrote: > Kern Sibbald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > What I don't like about this is that some users (such as myself) don't > > want to subscribe to lists even to get help > > If you got software for free, and you can't even be bothered to do

Re: [Bacula-users] Spam on this list

Kern Sibbald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > What I don't like about this is that some users (such as myself) don't want > to > subscribe to lists even to get help If you got software for free, and you can't even be bothered to do something as simple as subscribe to a free mailing list to receive f

Re: [Bacula-users] Spam on this list

On Tuesday 17 May 2005 16:36, Jo wrote: > Henry Yen wrote: > >The two opposing positions are: > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html > > > >I have no particular opinion one way or another, but popular sentiment > >(including

Re: [Bacula-users] Spam on this list

Hello, I get a good number of requests to change the list behavior to "mung" the Reply-To. It might perhaps help me avoid getting two copies of most emails I send that get answered, and help those that forget to use the "Respond to all", but as the first of the articles points out, it can cre

Re: [Bacula-users] Spam on this list

Henry Yen wrote: The two opposing positions are: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html I have no particular opinion one way or another, but popular sentiment (including mailman's default settings) very much favor the first of the tw

Re: [Bacula-users] Spam on this list

On Tue, 17 May 2005, Henry Yen wrote: Moreover, other closed lists that I'm on occasionally get spam from listmembers whose machines are compromised (100.00% windows 'bots, so far). Or mail forged to be from list members - the actual checking is fairly dain bramaged in almost all lists and relies

Re: [Bacula-users] Spam on this list

On 17 May 2005 at 13:30, Jo wrote: > While we're at it. It would be nice to have the reply-to field set to > the list where the mail came from and not to the person who sent the > mail. Even though I switched to a mail client that has a send to all > button, I constantly forget that I have to p

Re: [Bacula-users] Spam on this list

On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:30:56AM +0200, Jo wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > >So, what I am suggesting as a *possibility* is: > >- Modify the bacula-users (and probably bacula-devel) list to be subscriber > >only. > > > >What I don't like about this is that some users (such as myself) don't want

Re: [Bacula-users] Spam on this list

On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:54:39PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Tuesday 17 May 2005 12:18, Christoph Haas wrote: > > Can't you just set 'generic_nonmember_action' to 'reject'? That's what I > > do with my mailman lists. It just rejects emails from non-subscribers > > without administrative inter

Re: [Bacula-users] Spam on this list

Kern, I vote for the subscriber only list. Generally speaking I do not subscribe to lists due to all the volume, but this seems like a pretty good lists, I have gotten many more questions resolved just by being subscribed, than posting to the forums and checking every few days or so. In this case

Re: [Bacula-users] Spam on this list

On Tuesday 17 May 2005 12:18, Christoph Haas wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 11:50:20AM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > So, what I am suggesting as a *possibility* is: > > - Modify the bacula-users (and probably bacula-devel) list to be > > subscriber only. > > - Nightly purge all email held for ad

Re: [Bacula-users] Spam on this list

Kern Sibbald wrote: Hello, Notwithstanding my previous remarks about spam, I have noticed that there is more and more on this list. After thinking about it for a while, I can implement a script that automatically rejects all email by nonsubscribed users (it also rejects all other email held for

Re: [Bacula-users] Spam on this list

tir, 17,.05.2005 kl. 11.50 +0200, skrev Kern Sibbald: > Hello, > > Notwithstanding my previous remarks about spam, I have noticed that there is > more and more on this list. After thinking about it for a while, I can > implement a script that automatically rejects all email by nonsubscribed >

Re: [Bacula-users] Spam on this list

On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 11:50:20AM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > So, what I am suggesting as a *possibility* is: > - Modify the bacula-users (and probably bacula-devel) list to be subscriber > only. > - Nightly purge all email held for administrative approval -- i.e. all emails > from nonsubscribe

[Bacula-users] Spam on this list

Hello, Notwithstanding my previous remarks about spam, I have noticed that there is more and more on this list. After thinking about it for a while, I can implement a script that automatically rejects all email by nonsubscribed users (it also rejects all other email held for administrative app

Re: [Bacula-users] SPAM

On Tuesday 10 May 2005 11:05, Alan Brown wrote: > On Mon, 9 May 2005, David Clymer wrote: > > For another opinion: > > > > I really can't remember any previous instances of spam on the list. > > There have been about a dozen in the last 6 months. > > > ... but the point is that i dont believe spam

Re: [Bacula-users] SPAM

On Tue, 10 May 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote: Prior to having a spam filter I'd found that pressing the delete key works pretty well and amazingly fast. The dangers of deleting legitimate mail unread should be obvious. As are the dangers of having any filter which accepts then dumps mail, or tags it fo

Re: [Bacula-users] SPAM

On Mon, 9 May 2005, David Clymer wrote: For another opinion: I really can't remember any previous instances of spam on the list. There have been about a dozen in the last 6 months. ... but the point is that i dont believe spam is a common occurance on bacula-users. Speaking with 15 years mail and u

Re: [Bacula-users] SPAM

On Monday 09 May 2005 21:16, David Clymer wrote: > On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 19:01 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Monday 09 May 2005 16:43, Alan Brown wrote: > > > On Mon, 9 May 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > > On Monday 09 May 2005 14:11, Alan Brown wrote: > > > >> Can we PLEASE have the list swit

Re: [Bacula-users] SPAM

On Monday 09 May 2005 19:05, Christopher Rasch-Olsen Raa wrote: > man, 09,.05.2005 kl. 13.11 +0100, skrev Alan Brown: > > Can we PLEASE have the list switched to members-posting only? > > That would be very nice (considering recent events). :p What are the recent events that I should consider? >

Re: [Bacula-users] SPAM

On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 19:01 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Monday 09 May 2005 16:43, Alan Brown wrote: > > On Mon, 9 May 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > On Monday 09 May 2005 14:11, Alan Brown wrote: > > >> Can we PLEASE have the list switched to members-posting only? > > > > > > I don't see any S

Re: [Bacula-users] SPAM

man, 09,.05.2005 kl. 13.11 +0100, skrev Alan Brown: > Can we PLEASE have the list switched to members-posting only? That would be very nice (considering recent events). :p - Christopher --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games

Re: [Bacula-users] SPAM

On Monday 09 May 2005 16:43, Alan Brown wrote: > On Mon, 9 May 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Monday 09 May 2005 14:11, Alan Brown wrote: > >> Can we PLEASE have the list switched to members-posting only? > > > > I don't see any SPAM because I use a Bayesian filter. > > Perhaps the Bayesian filte

Re: [Bacula-users] SPAM

On Mon, 9 May 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote: On Monday 09 May 2005 14:11, Alan Brown wrote: Can we PLEASE have the list switched to members-posting only? I don't see any SPAM because I use a Bayesian filter. Perhaps the Bayesian filter should be in front of the submission address --

Re: [Bacula-users] SPAM

On Monday 09 May 2005 14:11, Alan Brown wrote: > Can we PLEASE have the list switched to members-posting only? I don't see any SPAM because I use a Bayesian filter. However, I'll be happy to switch to members only posting, *provided* that someone can show me how to make the Source Forge Mailman

[Bacula-users] SPAM

Can we PLEASE have the list switched to members-posting only? --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT