- Original Message -
From: "Robert J. Chassell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: They've cloned the president
> On 24 Nov 2005, Dan Minette wrote
>
> Look at Brin's arguments here. He claims that
On 24 Nov 2005, Dan Minette wrote
Look at Brin's arguments here. He claims that two generations of
Bush's are traitors ... Both Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. were tools of
Saudi Arabia, and governed the US's foreign policy according to
the orders they were given ...
This is not what I r
Dan wrote:
I did this out of order because I think this exchange fits perfectly well
with my hypothesis: GWB "knew" Hussein was behind the attack; just as he
"knew" that Hussein's WMD program was well advanced. I am not defending
his judgement; I think that his judgement in this case was horrib
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Pensinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion"
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 8:48 PM
Subject: Re: They've cloned the president
> Richard Clarke on the Bush reaction to 911:
>
> "The pres
Dan wrote:
Well, what was really known with any certainty before one of the
Curveball's handlers came public? Second hand stories, that ended up
being true. But, as Mike Wallace
Dan Rather, you mean.
can tell you, there are second hand stories
that are supported by forged documents and ar
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion"
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: They've cloned the president
> Dan Minette wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > From:
Julia Thompson wrote:
> Robert Seeberger wrote:
>
>> It seems to me that the Media handled Nixon quite differently
>> during
>> Watergate and I might be unfair in expecting the media to
>> photograph
>> for posterity the emperers full frontal nudity rather than dance
>> around the subject trying
Robert Seeberger wrote:
It seems to me that the Media handled Nixon quite differently during
Watergate and I might be unfair in expecting the media to photograph
for posterity the emperers full frontal nudity rather than dance
around the subject trying to pinch his behind.
That's impressive,
Nick Arnett wrote:
>
> In other words, their defense is a weak straw man. "We didn't
> manipulate intelligence," is weak because there's a fair bit of
> evidence that they did. But it's a straw man because the core of
> their irresponsibility was to screw up the process that formerly
> produced r
Dan Minette wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Killer Bs Discussion"
> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 7:30 PM
> Subject: Re: They've cloned the president
>>
>> For what it is worth
The administration is getting high and mighty about people who suggest that
they manipulated intelligence. To me, this seems totally beside the point,
given that they have admitted the intelligence was wrong. These people are
our leaders -- it was their responsibility to get the intelligence righ
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion"
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 7:30 PM
Subject: Re: They've cloned the president
>
> For what it is worth, I disagree with Murtha, I think it would be a
>
> From: Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > The Fool wrote:
> > >> From: Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>
> > >> Nick Arnett wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> 'Rumsfeld went on to say that "very little support went to Jack
> > >>> Murtha" after t
Dan Minette wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Killer Bs Discussion"
> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 4:28 PM
> Subject: Re: They've cloned the president
>
>
>> The Fool wrote:
>
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion"
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: They've cloned the president
> The Fool wrote:
> >> From: Robert Seeberger <
The Fool wrote:
>> From: Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> Nick Arnett wrote:
>>>
>>> 'Rumsfeld went on to say that "very little support went to Jack
>>> Murtha" after the congressman spoke out last week. "The Democrats
>>> didn't step up and support it, and Republicans didn't step up and
> From: Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Nick Arnett wrote:
> >
> > 'Rumsfeld went on to say that "very little support went to Jack
> > Murtha" after the congressman spoke out last week. "The Democrats
> > didn't step up and support it, and Republicans didn't step up and
> > support it. I
Nick Arnett wrote:
>
> 'Rumsfeld went on to say that "very little support went to Jack
> Murtha" after the congressman spoke out last week. "The Democrats
> didn't step up and support it, and Republicans didn't step up and
> support it. I think it's important for our troops to know that."'
>
*That
On Nov 20, 2005, at 10:50 PM, Nick Arnett wrote:
Oh, and John Murtha. Hero. Oorah.
The fiery, emotional debate climaxed when Ohio Congresswoman Jean
Schmidt, who is the lowest in seniority, recounted a message a Marine
colonel wanted to send to Murtha. She said he told her that "cowards
On Nov 20, 2005, at 10:50 PM, Nick Arnett wrote:
"People should feel comfortable about expressing their opinions
about Iraq,"
the president said. "I heard somebody say, well, maybe so-and-so is
not
patriotic because they disagree with my position. I totally reject
that
thought. This is not
Many, many years ago, when I was working as a news writer at KQV Radio, the
all-news station in Pittsburgh (where Dave Land and I became friends) we got
periodic phone calls from a woman we called The Martian Lady. One of those
calls came shortly after the president had visited an island off the co
21 matches
Mail list logo
