chedule uses cfhttp
>to post the url which (again if on the same server ) uses another request
>and uses a thread. Now if both scheduled task are long running request then
>you will be tying up 4 threads for that time and the server could appear
>hung.
>
> Also, be sure you're
ds for that time and the server could appear
> hung.
>
> Also, be sure you're on SP1.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> >
> > Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 09:30:52 -0700
> > From: "Jaime Garza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMA
Thanks
>
> Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 09:30:52 -0700
> From: "Jaime Garza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1. SP2?
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
&
> Here's an example of a batch file that you could schedule via
> AT or WinAT
> (or any other non-CF scheduling service). The first two lines set NT
[snip]
Thanks for that Jim - appreciated.
--
Aidan Whitehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Netshopper UK Ltd
Advanced Web Solutions & Services
http://w
I have been using Arcana Scheduler for the last few years and couldn't be
happier
Does all kinds of task scheduling at $55.00 per server.
Details can be found at:
http://www.arcanadev.com/scheduler/
Frank
--
Arch
;CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 9:47 AM
Subject: RE: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1
> > Is CFSCHEDULE any more reliable in v4.5.1 than in past
> > releases? I've never
> > trusted it, always using Windows AT to run batch file
gt;
> I'm not sure of the cost , but it's not much.
> Ask Howie about it he is on this list .
>
> Justin
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Aidan Whitehall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 8:48 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1
>
>
> > Is CFSCHEDULE any more reliable in v4.5.1 than in past
> > releases? I've never
> > trusted it, always using Windows A
> I believe in the Windows NT resource kit you can find WinAT which is a
> graphical interface to teh command line AT command, that
> should help you a
> ton into using it...
Thanks... I'll look into that.
--
Aidan Whitehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Netshopper UK Ltd
Advanced Web Solutions & Serv
. he is on this list .
Justin
- Original Message -
From: "Aidan Whitehall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 4:47 PM
Subject: RE: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1
> > Is CFSCHEDULE any m
AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1
> Is CFSCHEDULE any more reliable in v4.5.1 than in past
> releases? I've never
> trusted it, always using Windows AT to run batch files
> launching templates.
I'm really struggling with the scheduler a
> Is CFSCHEDULE any more reliable in v4.5.1 than in past
> releases? I've never
> trusted it, always using Windows AT to run batch files
> launching templates.
I'm really struggling with the scheduler at the moment... nuthin' seems to
work (haven't tried setting up events using the CFSCHEDULE
A core piece of our site depended heavily on CFSCHEDULE operating properly.
Of course it didn't so we had to find another ways to schedule the
executions of site pages.
> From: "Jim McAtee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 14:19:55 -0600
> To: CF-Talk <[EM
I have been using the CFSCHEDULE in 4.01 and 4.51
and runs great for me.
Server platform: Windows NT SP 4
-Original Message-
From: Jim McAtee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 4:20 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1
Is CFSCHEDULE any
14 matches
Mail list logo
