Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filtering

2001-05-26 Thread Greg Wooledge
Aaron P Ingebrigtsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Lets say your node can have only 1mb of data on it at a time, and lets > say you are downloading a 15 meg file. Under the current freenet > configuration I think you would not be able to download that file [...] With the current Freenet, the wh

Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filtering

2001-05-25 Thread Aaron P Ingebrigtsen
On Thu, 24 May 2001 08:26:51 +0100 "Patrick Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It means that if there is a risk of my losing my job because of > what's on my > hard drive, I need to know that Freenet uses some secure encryption > method. > As was pointed out, there is no risk here. Yep. :) >

Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filtering

2001-05-25 Thread Aaron P Ingebrigtsen
On Fri, 25 May 2001 07:18:20 +0100 Leo Howell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 09:12:58PM -0700, Dev Random wrote: > > Well, if you split up the files, then you can have nodes that do > not have > > enough information to reconstruct any particular file. It's a > future > >

Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filtering

2001-05-24 Thread Leo Howell
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 09:12:58PM -0700, Dev Random wrote: > Well, if you split up the files, then you can have nodes that do not have > enough information to reconstruct any particular file. It's a future > feature, I would hope. I don't mean to be pedantic, but wouldn't you still then have al

Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filtering

2001-05-24 Thread Dev Random
Well, if you split up the files, then you can have nodes that do not have enough information to reconstruct any particular file. It's a future feature, I would hope. On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 05:16:29PM +0100, Leo Howell wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 05:12:43PM +0100, Patrick Kirk wrote: > > Wi

Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filtering

2001-05-24 Thread Patrick Kirk
(snip) | > and copyright protection can't co-exist. But computers and HR | > managers with | > the authority to fire you do comfortably co-exist. Is some kind of | | What does that mean? The computer and the manager don't comfortably | coexist because the manager has total control over the com

Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filtering

2001-05-23 Thread Aaron P Ingebrigtsen
On Tue, 22 May 2001 22:53:14 +0100 "Patrick Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all, > > I'm learning to program and thinking of using Freenet as a back-up > resource > in a project I'm working on. I doubt this will ever have commercial > value > but its an interesting thing to work on...

Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filtering

2001-05-23 Thread Leo Howell
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 05:12:43PM +0100, Patrick Kirk wrote: > Without the key index, how would freegle work? I wasn't quite serious about that bit! Basically if it's possible to retrieve data it's possible to find out what you have (think computer goes into courtroom, disconnected from interne

Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filtering

2001-05-23 Thread Patrick Kirk
Without the key index, how would freegle work? ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat

Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filtering

2001-05-23 Thread Leo Howell
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 05:01:15PM -0500, Mathew Ryden wrote: > The reason for all of these nopes is that the node has no idea what kind of > content it's storing. The actual encryption is done clientside so trying to > filter it in the node is futile. With filesplitting, you can't glean any > inf

Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filtering

2001-05-22 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Patrick Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Good. So if write a utility to search for *.mp3, *.mpg and *.zip files in > the Freenet directory it will come up with precisely nothing? Yup. > Ever? Yup. :) > Because, if that's the case, I need have no concerns about

Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filtering

2001-05-22 Thread Patrick Kirk
Good. So if write a utility to search for *.mp3, *.mpg and *.zip files in the Freenet directory it will come up with precisely nothing? Ever? Because, if that's the case, I need have no concerns about an overhelpful colleague sharing the contents of that directory with HR ;-) _

Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filtering

2001-05-22 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Patrick Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 4:53 PM Subject: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filtering > Hi all, > > I'm learning to program and thinking of using Freenet

[freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filtering

2001-05-22 Thread Patrick Kirk
Hi all, I'm learning to program and thinking of using Freenet as a back-up resource in a project I'm working on. I doubt this will ever have commercial value but its an interesting thing to work on... The question is one of legal responsibility if some child porn is dumped on the server. Ian C