Re: [Cooker] Mandrake wesite fonts

2003-09-10 Thread Robert L martin
Okay, thanks to Frederic, we know it's Mr. Duval who should be informed...so I've sent him a mail summarising the thread so far and quoting the more general CSS improvements that were suggested as well. And while he is fixing the site he needs to remember that cute doesn't cut it if you are old en

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake wesite fonts

2003-09-10 Thread jokerman64
On Tuesday 09 September 2003 10:09 pm, jokerman64 wrote: > OK, so here i am after p-chem lab and i open my mail and get the new > "updated mandrake club" website mail. So i go and check it out, kinda > excited to see if it's "worthy of me" now so that i can join and I see that > it's still the same

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake wesite fonts

2003-09-10 Thread jokerman64
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 08:58 am, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 13:49, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 13:45, Buchan Milne wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > I hope the other people who

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake wesite fonts

2003-09-10 Thread jokerman64
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 06:13 am, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 03:09, jokerman64 wrote: > > OK, so here i am after p-chem lab and i open my mail and get the new > > "updated mandrake club" website mail. So i go and check it out, kinda > > excited to see if it's "worthy of m

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake wesite fonts

2003-09-10 Thread Thomas Backlund
Adam Williamson kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika Keskiviikko 10. Syyskuuta 2003 15:58): > On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 13:49, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 13:45, Buchan Milne wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > >

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake wesite fonts

2003-09-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 13:45, Buchan Milne wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Adam Williamson wrote: > > I hope the other people who've posted > > agreeing with the original problem should be enough to convince whoever > > *is* the webmaster to fix this... > > Well, that'

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake wesite fonts

2003-09-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 13:49, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 13:45, Buchan Milne wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > I hope the other people who've posted > > > agreeing with the original problem should be enough to convi

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake wesite fonts

2003-09-10 Thread Frederic Crozat
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:23:13 +0200, Buchan Milne wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: >> FACORAT Fabrice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >>>so they don't know how to use css, class, implicite class, etc ... ? >>>The problem is that many mdk site n

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake wesite fonts

2003-09-10 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Adam Williamson wrote: > I hope the other people who've posted > agreeing with the original problem should be enough to convince whoever > *is* the webmaster to fix this... Well, that's kind of impossible considering no-one else cc'ed the webmaster, a

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake wesite fonts

2003-09-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 13:28, Han Boetes wrote: > Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 11:42, Han Boetes wrote: > > > Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 11:12, Han Boetes wrote: > > > > > jokerman64 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake wesite fonts

2003-09-10 Thread Han Boetes
Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 11:42, Han Boetes wrote: > > Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 11:12, Han Boetes wrote: > > > > jokerman64 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > 1. The fonts suck! > > > > [ snip: more of the same

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake wesite fonts

2003-09-10 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > FACORAT Fabrice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>so they don't know how to use css, class, implicite class, etc ... ? >>The problem is that many mdk site need to be redesigned. > > > the others websites (like mandrake-linux.c

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake wesite fonts

2003-09-10 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
FACORAT Fabrice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > so they don't know how to use css, class, implicite class, etc ... ? > The problem is that many mdk site need to be redesigned. the others websites (like mandrake-linux.com) are old and was designed for the only descent linux browser available at this

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake wesite fonts

2003-09-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 14:45, FACORAT Fabrice wrote: > > The same issue applies here, you should use instead: > > font-family: arial, sans-serif, helvetica; > > you should put Verdana before Arial as Arial sometimes is bolder than > other fonts. Agreed. Besides, Verdana was expressly designed

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake wesite fonts

2003-09-10 Thread FACORAT Fabrice
Le mer 10/09/2003 à 10:35, Buchan Milne a écrit : > AFAIK, MandrakeClub now uses CSS for all style settings, and according > to Denis, doesn't set any fonts (though I will check later), however, > http://www.linux-mandrake.com is full of this junk: > > September 9th, 2003 > - Mandrake 9.2RC2 - T

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake wesite fonts

2003-09-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 11:42, Han Boetes wrote: > Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 11:12, Han Boetes wrote: > > > jokerman64 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > 1. The fonts suck! > > > [ snip: more of the same ] > > > > > > gee > > > > > > > > > Safe this as ~/.fo

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake wesite fonts

2003-09-10 Thread Han Boetes
Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 11:12, Han Boetes wrote: > > jokerman64 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 1. The fonts suck! > > [ snip: more of the same ] > > > > gee > > > > > > Safe this as ~/.fonts.conf: > > Um. Why the heck should we have to hack our fonts.con

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake wesite fonts

2003-09-10 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 03:09, jokerman64 wrote: > >>OK, so here i am after p-chem lab and i open my mail and get the new "updated >>mandrake club" website mail. So i go and check it out, kinda excited to see >>if it's "worthy of

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake wesite fonts

2003-09-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 11:12, Han Boetes wrote: > jokerman64 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 1. The fonts suck! > [ snip: more of the same ] > > gee > > > Safe this as ~/.fonts.conf: Um. Why the heck should we have to hack our fonts.conf file to workaround your badly setup website? Why not just f

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake wesite fonts

2003-09-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 03:09, jokerman64 wrote: > OK, so here i am after p-chem lab and i open my mail and get the new "updated > mandrake club" website mail. So i go and check it out, kinda excited to see > if it's "worthy of me" now so that i can join and I see that it's still the > same crappy

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake wesite fonts

2003-09-10 Thread Han Boetes
jokerman64 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. The fonts suck! [ snip: more of the same ] gee Safe this as ~/.fonts.conf: Helvetica sans-serif Times trebuchet Lucida sans-serif LucidaTypewriter monospace