On Monday 12 October 2009 03:39:44 pm Ed Leafe wrote:
> On Oct 12, 2009, at 5:13 PM, John wrote:
> > What is your opinion of "Pyjamas"? I have not used it yet but was
> > considering
> > using it to create the UI for a website. Is it better from a python
> > point of
> > view? Or would one be be
On Oct 12, 2009, at 5:13 PM, John wrote:
> What is your opinion of "Pyjamas"? I have not used it yet but was
> considering
> using it to create the UI for a website. Is it better from a python
> point of
> view? Or would one be better off using straight javascript.
I saw a very li
On Monday 12 October 2009 02:06:51 pm Ed Leafe wrote:
> Maybe it's just me, but I find even the advanced UIs of toolkits such
> as jQuery or ExtJS to be passable, but gravely lacking compared to
> OSX, Gnome or KDE. And to do that stuff in browsers, you're stuck with
> Javascript. I guess I'm
On Oct 12, 2009, at 2:04 PM, jpoorra...@aol.com wrote:
> But are there downsides for the user?
Depends on the user. Some prefer the Gmail interface; others prefer
Thunderbird, Mail.app or Outlook.
> I took another look at your talk, and it seems you're saying that the
> desktop applica
In a message dated 10/12/2009 1:46:51 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
e...@leafe.com writes:
On Oct 12, 2009, at 12:40 PM, jpoorra...@aol.com wrote:
> What are the downsides of browser-based apps?
None.
Assuming, of course, that you prefer programming in Javascript rather
than Python.
-
On Oct 12, 2009, at 12:40 PM, jpoorra...@aol.com wrote:
> What are the downsides of browser-based apps?
None.
Assuming, of course, that you prefer programming in Javascript rather
than Python.
-- Ed Leafe
___
Post Messages to:
"Rich" is another way of saying "desktop". IOW, apps that don't run
in a browser.
[snip]
Have you seen my PyCon 2009 talk? It's available online at
http://blip.tv/file/1947542/
Most of the time when people say web-based, they mean running in a
browser using HTML as the main UI. In my
On Oct 12, 2009, at 11:40 AM, jpoorra...@aol.com wrote:
> In a recent post you said:
>
> "Dabo is not a web framework like either of those [Django and
> Web2py]. Are
> you looking to do strictly web development, or are you looking for
> a rich
> client framework like Dabo?"
>
> I'd like to h
Ed,
In a recent post you said:
"Dabo is not a web framework like either of those [Django and Web2py]. Are
you looking to do strictly web development, or are you looking for a rich
client framework like Dabo?"
I'd like to hear what you mean by rich client here. I've heard of fat and
thin
