Re: Review Request 20177: ACCUMULO-2212 - ZooReaderWriterFactory, version 2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20177/#review40130 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Josh Elser On April 9, 2014, 11:04 p.m., Bil

Re: Accumulo site Bootstrapped

Bill, I just pushed some changes. I mostly changed things to help the flow of the page. - Shrink sidebar and "download" button, center justifying too. - Reworked some header tag (h1->h2, h3->h2, etc) - Reduced width of copyright to be slightly less prone to widows - Fixed grammar/capitalizatio

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo Blog

Seems reasonable. I just thought the organic, informal, open, topic-subscription model, was a good one. No formal maintenance/effort required. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Corey Nolet wrote: > Chris, would you be in favor of forwarding

Re: Release testing for 1.6.0

I have been working randomwalk. I got through my issue with the Concurrent rw test [1]. I am now seeing a problem with Shard [2] which I'm rerunning to get more information. I haven't seen the particular issues Eric encountered [3]. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2621 [2] http

Re: Accumulo site Bootstrapped

I think the new site is just about ready. Latest updates: - Replaced social network icons with approved graphics from the sites themselves. (Excellent catch Josh.) - Switched to better external link icons, moved icons to left of link text. - Added IRC channel link to sidebar. - Added bylaws and go

Re: Release testing for 1.6.0

I had a successful run of all UTs and ITs on Tuesday (against 479a36bd) On 4/3/14, 1:58 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: Cloudera has finished successfully verifying a 24 hour Continuous Ingest Test with agitation on an HA configured cluster with 7 nodes and 5 workers against 1.6.0 as of commit 3a1b38. W

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo Blog

Chris, would you be in favor of forwarding blog posts to G+ so that it can still be provided to that community? On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Corey Nolet wrote: > I'm in favor of full reposts wherever possible. It may be duplication of > content, but it validates for many that the content ha

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo Blog

I'm in favor of full reposts wherever possible. It may be duplication of content, but it validates for many that the content has been approved by the community. While the content is being republished, I'm still in favor of posting a link to the original blog post (if applicable). I find a blog use

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo Blog

I think that would be splendid, Don. :) I'd be happy to help out with getting this set up. I'm in favor of using Apache's blog infrastructure, at least at first, since it's ready to go and explicitly for this purpose. I like the sense of place it provides, vs. a loose topic on G+ / elsewhere. - I

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo Blog

Is this something i can volunteer to help manage if nobody else wants to? Do things like set it up, collect blog posts from authors, edit them, post them, manage the draft and vote process, etc. Just putting that out there as i see it as a way i can contribute to the community and i also person

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo Blog

Not sure how I feel about the Google+ community. As the PMC, aren't we responsible for brand management? On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Christopher wrote: > Personally, I'd find it easier to simply suggest people post to a > common Google+ topic/community, when there's something of community

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo Blog

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Christopher wrote: > Personally, I'd find it easier to simply suggest people post to a > common Google+ topic/community, when there's something of community > interest to blog about, rather than maintain a monolithic blog. > > Christopher, should we take this as

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo Blog

Personally, I'd find it easier to simply suggest people post to a common Google+ topic/community, when there's something of community interest to blog about, rather than maintain a monolithic blog. There may be others with the same topic/name, but this one is the one I saw first: https://plus.goog

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo Blog

Cell-Level Security wasn't patented? On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:33 AM, wrote: > > > > > > > From: "David Medinets" > > > > Can links to articles be posted or should the whole article be included > in > > the post? > > > > Not sure, might b

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo Blog

On 4/10/14, 12:24 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: 2. Guidelines for content. If we accept cross-posts from other sites or >blog posts from guest writers (non-contributors, non-committers), what >rules should be enforced (PMC is responsible for content)? For any author, >can their employer or employer's pr

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo Blog

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:33 AM, wrote: > > > From: "David Medinets" > > Can links to articles be posted or should the whole article be included in > the post? > > Not sure, might be up to us. > > I'd much rather we not do links only. If I'm coming to our blog as a centralized point, I don't wan

Re: Review Request 20180: ACCUMULO-2654 Adds utility for creating empty rfile.

> On April 10, 2014, 2 a.m., Josh Elser wrote: > > src/core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/file/rfile/CreateEmpty.java, > > line 43 > > > > > > This will create a file in HDFS because CachedConfiguration will

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo Blog

- Original Message - From: "David Medinets" To: "accumulo-dev" Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 12:27:37 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo Blog Can links to articles be posted or should the whole article be included in the post? Not sure, might be up to us. Are the posts brand

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo Blog

- Original Message - From: "Sean Busbey" To: "dev@accumulo apache. org" Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 12:24:21 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo Blog On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:12 AM, wrote: > I am proposing a blog for the project to be hosted on the > blogs.apache.orgsite.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo Blog

Can links to articles be posted or should the whole article be included in the post? Are the posts branded as Accumulo or the individual contributor? On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:12 PM, wrote: > I am proposing a blog for the project to be hosted on the > blogs.apache.orgsite. There was a similar

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo Blog

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:12 AM, wrote: > I am proposing a blog for the project to be hosted on the > blogs.apache.orgsite. There was a similar proposal last year on the dev list > [1], but no > vote or decision. Apache has a web page with setup instructions [2], which > also states that the PM

[PROPOSAL] Accumulo Blog

I am proposing a blog for the project to be hosted on the blogs.apache.org site. There was a similar proposal last year on the dev list [1], but no vote or decision. Apache has a web page with setup instructions [2], which also states that the PMC is responsible for the blog content and for gran

Re: Review Request 20180: ACCUMULO-2654 Adds utility for creating empty rfile.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20180/#review40021 --- src/core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/file/rfile/CreateEm

Re: Review Request 20180: ACCUMULO-2654 Adds utility for creating empty rfile.

> On April 10, 2014, 2 a.m., Josh Elser wrote: > > src/core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/file/rfile/CreateEmpty.java, > > line 43 > > > > > > This will create a file in HDFS because CachedConfiguration will

Re: Review Request 20180: ACCUMULO-2654 Adds utility for creating empty rfile.

> On April 10, 2014, 2 a.m., Josh Elser wrote: > > src/core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/file/rfile/CreateEmpty.java, > > line 43 > > > > > > This will create a file in HDFS because CachedConfiguration will

Re: Review Request 20180: ACCUMULO-2654 Adds utility for creating empty rfile.

> On April 10, 2014, 2 a.m., Josh Elser wrote: > > src/core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/file/rfile/CreateEmpty.java, > > line 43 > > > > > > This will create a file in HDFS because CachedConfiguration will

Re: Review Request 20180: ACCUMULO-2654 Adds utility for creating empty rfile.

> On April 9, 2014, 9:42 p.m., Mike Drob wrote: > > Worth noting that in later version we switched away from commons-cli in > > favor of jcommander. > > > > Also, can you add a unit test? > > kturner wrote: > Since Accumulo does not normally create empty RFiles, its not a well > tested th

Review Request 20208: ACCUMULO-2621 - make sure Concurrent.xml works

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20208/ --- Review request for accumulo and Christopher Tubbs. Bugs: ACCUMULO-2621 http