[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-5716) TopicSubscription gets into endless loop when memory limit reached

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14488328#comment-14488328 ] Timothy Bish commented on AMQ-5716: --- This seems valid to me after review. It'd be nice to

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-5716) TopicSubscription gets into endless loop when memory limit reached

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14488325#comment-14488325 ] Timothy Bish commented on AMQ-5716: --- Some work in this area already for related issue. >

Re: [DISCUSS] Fix Sorting of Board Reports

Thanks for the feedback, everyone. It looks like there's no technical reason for the current naming scheme. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't breaking some kind of formatting requirement from the Board. I'll get them fixed up shortly. Best, Jim On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Gary Tully wro

[jira] [Created] (ACTIVEMQ6-96) Implement administrative limit for the maximum client connections allowed

Justin Bertram created ACTIVEMQ6-96: --- Summary: Implement administrative limit for the maximum client connections allowed Key: ACTIVEMQ6-96 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-96 Pro

Re: Future of Apollo...

Well, I've stopped working on apollo since the community aspects of it did not seem to be getting much traction. If your using it and find any problems with it, please send in patches :) You part of solving the community problem and help maintain and push apollo forward. On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at

Re: Naming Suggestions?

Nope. On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 09:18:28AM -0400, James Carman wrote: > It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code names? > > On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino wrote: > > > I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it. > > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04

Future of Apollo...

I tested many brokers and am very impressed with the performance characteristics of Apollo. I work for a large company and the broker is going to be the backbone of a large infrastructure project. The issue is that while Apollo does well in my tests, its future seems uncertain. Especially being

[GitHub] activemq-6 pull request: few changes I found when debugging the te...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/203 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: [DISCUSS] Fix Sorting of Board Reports

renaming makes sense to me. On 9 Apr 2015 19:44, "Jim Gomes" wrote: > Thanks, Tim. That is a clear and compelling reason to keep them there. > > With that clarified, does anyone have any comments on the renaming of the > pages to improve the indexing? > > Best, > Jim > > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at

Re: [VOTE] HornetQ Code Donation should use a codename

+1 On 9 Apr 2015 14:06, "Hiram Chirino" wrote: > Lots of confusion has occurred since we did not use a code name for > the code donation from the start. Everyone refers to it as HornetQ > which adds to the Trademark confusions. Also the current state of the > code is not ready to become ActiveM

Re: [DISCUSS] Fix Sorting of Board Reports

Your proposal sounds good to me. On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Jim Gomes wrote: > Thanks, Tim. That is a clear and compelling reason to keep them there. > > With that clarified, does anyone have any comments on the renaming of the > pages to improve the indexing? > > Best, > Jim > > > On Thu, A

Re: [DISCUSS] Fix Sorting of Board Reports

Thanks, Tim. That is a clear and compelling reason to keep them there. With that clarified, does anyone have any comments on the renaming of the pages to improve the indexing? Best, Jim On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Timothy Bish wrote: > On 04/09/2015 02:13 PM, Jim Gomes wrote: > > Thanks

[GitHub] activemq-6 pull request: few changes I found when debugging the te...

GitHub user clebertsuconic opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/203 few changes I found when debugging the testsuite I was looking for why the testsuite was broken, and I found these in the process You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by

Re: [DISCUSS] Fix Sorting of Board Reports

On 04/09/2015 02:13 PM, Jim Gomes wrote: > Thanks for the explanation. That helps. > > So, I guess we could discuss the merits of keeping the Board Reports on our > wiki, as it does seem somewhat redundant. As long as they exist on the > wiki, it would be helpful to have a better indexing system. >

Re: [DISCUSS] Fix Sorting of Board Reports

Thanks for the explanation. That helps. So, I guess we could discuss the merits of keeping the Board Reports on our wiki, as it does seem somewhat redundant. As long as they exist on the wiki, it would be helpful to have a better indexing system. Perhaps Hiram can offer background as to the purpo

[GitHub] activemq-6 pull request: Add Auto JMS queue creation for OpenWire

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/202 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-5155) Heartbeat fails in STOMP over WebSockets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14487732#comment-14487732 ] Timothy Bish commented on AMQ-5155: --- Keep testing it and report back if you find any other

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-5155) Heartbeat fails in STOMP over WebSockets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14487704#comment-14487704 ] Chad Kelly commented on AMQ-5155: - You are correct, using /topic/test works as expected. I p

Re: [DISCUSS] Fix Sorting of Board Reports

> On Apr 9, 2015, at 1:02 PM, Jim Gomes wrote: > > Thanks for the link, Dan. I didn't know those were there. I think the main > difference here is that link is to the Board Minutes, whereas the ActiveMQ > wiki has the Board Report. They seem to be identical, but will they always > be? Possibly

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-5155) Heartbeat fails in STOMP over WebSockets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14487682#comment-14487682 ] Timothy Bish commented on AMQ-5155: --- This is not a bug, the default address string in tha

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-5155) Heartbeat fails in STOMP over WebSockets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14487669#comment-14487669 ] Chad Kelly commented on AMQ-5155: - Even though the above bug was fixed, a related bug now oc

Re: [DISCUSS] Fix Sorting of Board Reports

Thanks for the link, Dan. I didn't know those were there. I think the main difference here is that link is to the Board Minutes, whereas the ActiveMQ wiki has the Board Report. They seem to be identical, but will they always be? And even if they are identical, do we still need to have the redundanc

[GitHub] activemq-6 pull request: Add Auto JMS queue creation for OpenWire

GitHub user mtaylor opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/202 Add Auto JMS queue creation for OpenWire You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/mtaylor/activemq-6 autoQueueCreationOpenWire Alter

[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-5716) TopicSubscription gets into endless loop when memory limit reached

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michal Kubricht updated AMQ-5716: - Affects Version/s: 5.10.2 5.11.1 > TopicSubscription gets into endless loop w

Re: [DISCUSS] Fix Sorting of Board Reports

No “objection”, but why don’t we just delete the page and point at the official records: https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/ActiveMQ.html Dan > On Apr 9, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Jim Gomes wrote: > > I recently went out to look at previous Board Reports ( > http://activemq.apache.org/apache-

Re: [VOTE] HornetQ Code Donation should use a codename

+1 -dain On Apr 9, 2015, at 6:06 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote: > Lots of confusion has occurred since we did not use a code name for > the code donation from the start. Everyone refers to it as HornetQ > which adds to the Trademark confusions. Also the current state of the > code is not ready to b

[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-5716) TopicSubscription gets into endless loop when memory limit reached

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michal Kubricht updated AMQ-5716: - Attachment: TopicSubscriptionTest.java junit_amq_5716.patch fix_amq_5

[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-5716) TopicSubscription gets into endless loop when memory limit reached

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michal Kubricht updated AMQ-5716: - Description: I might be wrong, but I think that there is a mistake in {{FilePendingMessageCursor}}

[DISCUSS] Fix Sorting of Board Reports

I recently went out to look at previous Board Reports ( http://activemq.apache.org/apache-activemq-board-reports.html) and found the current sorting method difficult to deal with. Unless we are required to use the page naming format, I would like to change it to the following format: Apache Active

[jira] [Created] (AMQ-5716) TopicSubscription gets into endless loop when memory limit reached

Michal Kubricht created AMQ-5716: Summary: TopicSubscription gets into endless loop when memory limit reached Key: AMQ-5716 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5716 Project: ActiveMQ

Re: [VOTE] HornetQ Code Donation should use a codename

+1 (non-binding) Regards Krzysztof On 09.04.2015 15:06, Hiram Chirino wrote: > Lots of confusion has occurred since we did not use a code name for > the code donation from the start. Everyone refers to it as HornetQ > which adds to the Trademark confusions. Also the current state of the > code

Re: [VOTE] HornetQ Code Donation should use a codename

+1 david jencks On Apr 9, 2015, at 9:06 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote: > Lots of confusion has occurred since we did not use a code name for > the code donation from the start. Everyone refers to it as HornetQ > which adds to the Trademark confusions. Also the current state of the > code is not rea

Re: [VOTE] HornetQ Code Donation should use a codename

+1 On 09/04/15 14:06, Hiram Chirino wrote: Lots of confusion has occurred since we did not use a code name for the code donation from the start. Everyone refers to it as HornetQ which adds to the Trademark confusions. Also the current state of the code is not ready to become ActiveMQ 6. We can

Re: [VOTE] HornetQ Code Donation should use a codename

+1 On Apr 9, 2015 7:25 AM, "Clebert Suconic" wrote: > +1 > > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Hiram Chirino > wrote: > > Lots of confusion has occurred since we did not use a code name for > > the code donation from the start. Everyone refers to it as HornetQ > > which adds to the Trademark co

Re: [VOTE] HornetQ Code Donation should use a codename

+1 On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote: > Lots of confusion has occurred since we did not use a code name for > the code donation from the start. Everyone refers to it as HornetQ > which adds to the Trademark confusions. Also the current state of the > code is not ready to beco

Re: [VOTE] HornetQ Code Donation should use a codename

+1 - Original Message - From: "Hiram Chirino" To: "ActiveMQ-Developers" Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2015 8:06:16 AM Subject: [VOTE] HornetQ Code Donation should use a codename Lots of confusion has occurred since we did not use a code name for the code donation from the start. Everyone re

High Availablity with journal messages

I am new to activemq. We are prototyping a few queuing frameworks. 2 Of the things we require is High Availability and journaling. I understand that you can get HA with the Master/slave setup. Would this also guarantee durability. ie no messages that has been posted will be lost? Another thing

Re: [VOTE] HornetQ Code Donation should use a codename

+1 Hiram Chirino 9 April 2015 14:06 Lots of confusion has occurred since we did not use a code name for the code donation from the start. Everyone refers to it as HornetQ which adds to the Trademark confusions. Also the current state of the code is not ready to be

Re: [VOTE] HornetQ Code Donation should use a codename

On 04/09/2015 09:06 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote: > Lots of confusion has occurred since we did not use a code name for > the code donation from the start. Everyone refers to it as HornetQ > which adds to the Trademark confusions. Also the current state of the > code is not ready to become ActiveMQ 6.

Re: High Availablity with journal messages

In addition does HA imply redundancy on both storage(messages are duplicated across nodes) as well as connectivity(if a node goes down one would still be able to post to another) -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/High-Availablity-with-journal-messages-tp4694

Re: [VOTE] HornetQ Code Donation should use a codename

+1 On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote: > Lots of confusion has occurred since we did not use a code name for > the code donation from the start. Everyone refers to it as HornetQ > which adds to the Trademark confusions. Also the current state of the > code is not ready to beco

Re: [VOTE] HornetQ Code Donation should use a codename

+1 On Apr 9, 2015 9:06 AM, "Hiram Chirino" wrote: > Lots of confusion has occurred since we did not use a code name for > the code donation from the start. Everyone refers to it as HornetQ > which adds to the Trademark confusions. Also the current state of the > code is not ready to become Act

Re: Naming Suggestions?

It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code names? On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino wrote: > I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it. > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta > > wrote: > > Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it. > > > > On Wed,

Re: Naming Suggestions?

I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it. On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta wrote: > Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it. > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> >> > On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino >> wrote: >> > >> > Naming things is

[VOTE] HornetQ Code Donation should use a codename

Lots of confusion has occurred since we did not use a code name for the code donation from the start. Everyone refers to it as HornetQ which adds to the Trademark confusions. Also the current state of the code is not ready to become ActiveMQ 6. We can figure out what the code name should be late

[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-5715) ActiveMQ cannot load decryption password from environment variable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Antoine Wils updated AMQ-5715: -- Description: decryption of password not working when using wrapper to start ActiveMQ. The wrapper (bin/li

[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-5715) ActiveMQ cannot load decryption password from environment variable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Antoine Wils updated AMQ-5715: -- Attachment: activemq.patch attaching patch > ActiveMQ cannot load decryption password from environment va

[jira] [Created] (AMQ-5715) ActiveMQ cannot load decryption password from environment variable

Antoine Wils created AMQ-5715: - Summary: ActiveMQ cannot load decryption password from environment variable Key: AMQ-5715 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5715 Project: ActiveMQ Is

Re: [DISCUSS} HornetQ & ActiveMQ's next generation

+1 (Please pardon my reference to Buddhism here) In buddhist practice, we remind ourselves of many things every time we practice. One of those is stated this way, "forgive me for divisive actions," and, "I promise to avoid divisive actions." We all do it, whether with intent or not, but in the

[jira] [Resolved] (AMQ-5665) memory store is broken in 5.11.0 for advisories (and probably other issues as well)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dejan Bosanac resolved AMQ-5665. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 5.12.0 Assignee: Dejan Bosanac I ran into this writin

Re: [DISCUSS} HornetQ & ActiveMQ's next generation

On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 08:51:31AM +0200, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > 2015-04-09 3:59 GMT+02:00 James Carman : > > > I am trying to understand the picture that has been painted for us thus > > far. Maybe you can help me. First of all, the argument for why we need to > > start from the HornetQ code