Re: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?

+1. Need the beta especially because folks would want to test early and crossing the last mile can take a bit of time. But hopefully its not too much of an overhead. Thanks, -Nitin On 16/05/13 7:27 AM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote: >+1, perhaps I'm late to this thread, but this makes lot of sense. >

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1475) update keystore in SSVM and change download iso/template url after Update SSL Certificate

> On May 17, 2013, 5:18 a.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > Ship It! > > Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Nitin can you commit the patch > > Nitin Mehta wrote: > Some files seem to be removed or atleast the location has changed. Needs > to rebased. Wei - can you please take a look and commit it ?

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1475) update keystore in SSVM and change download iso/template url after Update SSL Certificate

> On May 17, 2013, 5:18 a.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > Ship It! > > Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Nitin can you commit the patch Some files seem to be removed or atleast the location has changed. Needs to rebased. Wei - can you please take a look and commit it ? - Nitin ---

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1475) update keystore in SSVM and change download iso/template url after Update SSL Certificate

> On March 15, 2013, 5:56 a.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > server/src/com/cloud/configuration/Config.java, line 120 > > > > > > are there any dependencies on this flag in the code ? > > We need to remove this flag durin

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1475) update keystore in SSVM and change download iso/template url after Update SSL Certificate

> On March 15, 2013, 5:56 a.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > server/src/com/cloud/configuration/Config.java, line 120 > > > > > > are there any dependencies on this flag in the code ? > > We need to remove this flag durin

Review Board Items

There are over 50 pending items in review board, please take a moment to review the patches for which you have been called out as reviewer. Thanks Animesh

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1475) update keystore in SSVM and change download iso/template url after Update SSL Certificate

> On May 17, 2013, 5:18 a.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > Ship It! Nitin can you commit the patch - Animesh --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9696/#review20681 --

Re: [ACS41] Current blocker status

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 07:12:14PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > See this discussion > > http://s.apache.org/gW > Nice - thanks for digging it up from the archives. I couldn't find it and had to write a long email explaining things :) -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRoc

Re: Review Request: debian: fix build of cloudstack-awsapi package

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11180/ --- (Updated May 17, 2013, 5:24 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Prachi Damle a

RE: Example code for GUI

So within this block , you could use anyone of the exception handling mechanisms as shown below - $.ajax({ url:'API CMD', data:data , success:function(args){ args.response.success(); }, error:function(args){

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1475) update keystore in SSVM and change download iso/template url after Update SSL Certificate

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9696/#review20681 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Nitin Mehta On March 15, 2013, 9:54 a.m., Wei

RE: Example code for GUI

You might also need to provide a logic at the API layer that It correctly handles the case for all 3 parameters being supplied together and thrown an exception if any one of the three parameters is missing . Moreover , you should also implement an API level check for the minlops and maxlops to e

RE: Example code for GUI

Yeah , so these dependencies/relationships would be handled when you are passing these parameters to the API call within the actions block. Below is the code snippet which will help you accomplish your tasks (might require little tweaking ) but that's how the structure should look like . ac

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1475) update keystore in SSVM and change download iso/template url after Update SSL Certificate

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9696/#review20678 --- Changes are looking fine. Nithin can you also please review the chang

Re: Example code for GUI

Perhaps I need to place my checks in the Action area? On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Hi Pranav, > > Thanks for posting the link to your commit, as well. :) > > I'm trying to set up my fields based on the pattern we already have today > w

Re: Example code for GUI

Hi Pranav, Thanks for posting the link to your commit, as well. :) I'm trying to set up my fields based on the pattern we already have today where the Admin can check a box to allow the User to specify a disk size. In my case, I'd like the Admin to check a box if he wants the User to potentially

Fw: About testing of OVS Tunnel Manager, Fail on create new instance

Hi Chiradeep, Thanks for your suggestion. When I configures "sdn.ovs.controller" to "true", I do not specify the "vnet" (vlan) range of guest network in the create advanced zone wizard. And, the field "vnet" is null in database table "physical_network". How to specify this parameters? ---

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1638) Network plugins won't be notified VM migration.

+1 I'm sorry that I could not make time to respond. I'll catch up after the merge. (2013/05/17 3:57), Chip Childers wrote: On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 06:55:30PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: Sheng, I'd suggest that you go ahead and merge the patch. +1

Re: [DOCS] Quick Install Guide updated lately?

On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 5:46 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Jessica Tomechak > wrote: > > There is a Quick Install Guide published on the docs site for 4.0.x. Has > > that been updated for 4.1, or is it even going to be published for 4.1? > I'm > > asking because I am

RE: Example code for GUI

Hey Ilya , So this is how you declare the following items - :{ createForm:{ fields:{ //CheckBox Item :{ Label:'Label Name', isBoolean:true,// This statement creates a checkbox for you

Re: About testing of OVS Tunnel Manager, Fail on create new instance

Hi Chiradeep, Thanks for your suggestion. When I configures "sdn.ovs.controller" to "true", I do not specify the "vnet" (vlan) range of guest network in the create advanced zone wizard. And, the field "vnet" is null in database table "physical_network". How to specify this parameters? -

Re: Properties file question

Perhaps someone knows why we sometimes use strings in English and other times use keys that resolve to the selected language. Trying to learn more about how our GUI works (example below). Thanks! + ramovercommit:{** + label: 'RAM overcommit ratio',** +

Re: Example code for GUI

Hi Wei, Thank you for the information. Your commit info should be quite valuable for me as a template for my own work. Talk to you later! On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote: > Mike, > > The features are totally different. For the VM Disk I/O Throttling, I want > to limit the vm

Re: Example code for GUI

Thanks Isaac Regards Ilya Original message From: Isaac Chiang Date: To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org,"Musayev, Ilya" Subject: Re: Example code for GUI Hi Musayev, You'll find out that there are "createForm" object under listView(or detailView) actions in each file,

Re: Example code for GUI

Hi Musayev, You'll find out that there are "createForm" object under listView(or detailView) actions in each file, e.g., instance.js, accounts.js. If you need a selection, you can just define a attribute for createForm like following: select: function(args) { //... } and pass retur

Re: Example code for GUI

Thank you Wei . Any idea on how can I change the field type from in UI from text field to multi-select or checkbox group? Is this CSS only change or is there more to it? Original message From: Wei ZHOU Date: To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Example code for GUI F

Re: Example code for GUI

>From my point view: (1) UI: ui/scripts/*.js (such as network.js, configuration.js) ui/dictionary.jsp client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages.properties (2) Java *Cmd.java (commands) *VO.java (tables) *Manager.java *ManagerImpl.java Wei 2013/5/17 Musayev, Ilya > We act

RE: Example code for GUI

We actually have a similar question on the GUI part, we've done lots of backend work, but the GUI part does not seem very straightforward. Would someone know how to add options into GUI? Also, How can I change the field type from in UI from text field to multi-select or checkbox group? What is

Re: Example code for GUI

Mike, The features are totally different. For the VM Disk I/O Throttling, I want to limit the vm disk I/O in the hypervisors (support KVM only now). However, you do it in the storage device (such as SAN). I added two fields: bps and iops (maximum, not average/minimum/burst) in disk_offering and

Re: Example code for GUI

It looks like your feature revolves around rate limiting, if I understand correctly. It seems like I could leverage a bit of what you're doing here, but I'd need additional fields in the Add Disk Offering dialog (and DB) since we support min, max, and burst values for IOPS (as opposed to just a ma

Re: Example code for GUI

Thanks for the info, Wei. I am in the process of writing a storage plug-in for Edison's new storage framework. The idea is to be able to have a single SAN volume associated with a single data disk. In our SAN, you can set Min, Max, and Burst IOPS values on a volume-by-volume basis and I'd like to

RE: [MERGE] [CLOUDSTACK-2056] DeploymentPlanner choice via ServiceOffering

Merged this branch to master. Thanks, Prachi -Original Message- From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 11:28 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [MERGE] [CLOUDSTACK-2056] DeploymentPlanner choice via ServiceOffering On Wed, May 15, 201

Re: Example code for GUI

Mike, I am working on Disk I/O Throttling now. The source code has been verified on 4.0.2. It need more test on master branch. I hope to finish it before the deadline of 4.2 feature freeze (31-5-2013). For more information: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1301 https://cwiki.apach

Re: Review Request: Added PlainTextAuthenticator

On 05/16/2013 10:55 PM, Chip Childers wrote: For those moving from 2.2.x, 3.0.x, 4.0 to 4.1: 1. We remove the incorrect auth mechanism and put in the right fix of encoding at the server and not doing any UI magic. 2. We correct the API docs and other docs to indicate the user to send in plaintext

RE: [MERGE]PVLAN branch to MASTER(v2)

Great, thanks Sheng! Regards, Vijay -Original Message- From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 2:59 PM To: Subject: Re: [MERGE]PVLAN branch to MASTER(v2) I've successfully applied the patch anyway. Thank you! --Sheng On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:55 PM,

Re: [MERGE]PVLAN branch to MASTER(v2)

I've successfully applied the patch anyway. Thank you! --Sheng On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Vijayendra Bhamidipati < vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com> wrote: > > I'm done with implementation of pvlan changes for VMWare - I've tested and > uploaded the diffs as a file on top of the current

Re: Review Request: PVLAN provisioning support for vmware Distributed Virtual Switch deployments on cloudstack.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11019/#review20664 --- Ship it! Applied to master. Thanks! commit 15be97772e1b41801867be

RE: [MERGE]PVLAN branch to MASTER(v2)

I'm done with implementation of pvlan changes for VMWare - I've tested and uploaded the diffs as a file on top of the current master branch to https://reviews.apache.org/r/11019/ I wasn't able to update the patch on review board though - I run into the error " error: short SHA1 01a0384 is ambi

Example code for GUI

Hi everyone, I'm trying to add a few fields to the GUI's Add Disk Offering dialog (min, max, and burst IOPS). Once I have these fields in place, they will of course need to pass this information to the backend and the data will need to end up in new fields in the DB. I was wondering if anyone kn

Re: Review Request: PVLAN provisioning support for vmware Distributed Virtual Switch deployments on cloudstack.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11019/ --- (Updated May 16, 2013, 9:45 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers,

Re: Review Request: Change unit of network statistics from 1000 to 1024 for KVM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11195/#review20657 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Chip Childers On May 16, 2013, 1:57 p.m., We

Re: [ACS41] Current blocker status

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 03:07:41PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 12:43 PM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: [ACS41] Current blocker status > > > > The f

Re: Review Request: Added PlainTextAuthenticator

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11194/#review20655 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Chip Childers On May 16, 2013, 10:39 a.m., K

Re: Review Request: Added PlainTextAuthenticator

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:50:21PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 04:03:14PM +0200, Ove Ewerlid wrote: > > I vote -1 for enabling plain text authentication allowing auth > > directly against hashes. I'm not clear if this functionality exists > > in ACS4.0, I would assume

Properties file question

Hi everyone, I'm in the process of adding a few fields to the Add Disk Offering dialog (Min, Max, and Burst IOPS). I was wondering which of the three English .properties files I need to add my new text into? Thanks! -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutk

Re: [GSOC] Student interviews

Hi Sebastien, You and I have appointment today at 3pm. I cannot find you on Skype. Please let me know what time you will be calling me my phone number is +1 267-243-3954 Adama On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On May 13, 2013, at 7:45 AM, ADAMA COULIBALY wrote: >

Re: [ACS41] Current blocker status

See this discussion http://s.apache.org/gW On 5/16/13 12:53 AM, "Kishan Kavala" wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] >> Sent: Thursday, 16 May 2013 12:39 PM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [ACS41] Current blocker status >

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1638) Network plugins won't be notified VM migration.

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 06:55:30PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > Sheng, I'd suggest that you go ahead and merge the patch. +1

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1638) Network plugins won't be notified VM migration.

Sheng, I'd suggest that you go ahead and merge the patch. On 5/16/13 11:20 AM, "Sheng Yang" wrote: >Hi Hiroaki, > >Ping again. > >I've got a patch(pvlan migration support for xen/kvm) based on your patch >here. I was assuming it would be soon for you to submit/merge the patch, >but it has been o

RE: Review Request: Added PlainTextAuthenticator

Nice explanation Prasanna. +1 to Kishan's fix. > -Original Message- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 9:50 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Kishan Kavala > Subject: Re: Review Request: Added PlainTextAuthenticator > > On Thu, May 16

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1638) Network plugins won't be notified VM migration.

Hi Hiroaki, Ping again. I've got a patch(pvlan migration support for xen/kvm) based on your patch here. I was assuming it would be soon for you to submit/merge the patch, but it has been one month since last update. And now the lacking of your patch blocked my fix... Could you tell what's happen

Re: About testing of OVS Tunnel Manager, Fail on create new instance

Did you specify the guest network "vlan" range in the create zone wizard? The exception is complaining that there are no virtual network ids available. Vnet ids are populated in the op_dc_vnet_alloc table when the updatePhysicalNetwork api is called. On 5/16/13 8:07 AM, "錦為" wrote: >Hi all, >Ac

RE: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2

I'm afraid it might introduce extra effort to allow them to use SG again if they manage to upgrade to 4.1. I already checked in the patch in 4-2-advanced-zone-security-group from master and did some basic tests. Wei Zhou kindly agreed to do more tests in that branch and add some integration test

Re: Review Request: Added PlainTextAuthenticator

+1 On 5/16/13 9:20 AM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: >On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 04:03:14PM +0200, Ove Ewerlid wrote: >> I vote -1 for enabling plain text authentication allowing auth >> directly against hashes. I'm not clear if this functionality exists >> in ACS4.0, I would assume not. >> >> The A

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2115 : [BasicZone-XenServer] Unable to add host to basic zone that is configured with bridge

> On May 14, 2013, 4:22 p.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > LGTM. Fairly straightforward to strip the word endings. Any concerns? I'll > > merge this tomorrow if none. Unfortunately 1518e7ee was fixed without applying your patch. I'm closing this as discarded. - Prasanna -

Re: Review Request: Added PlainTextAuthenticator

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 04:03:14PM +0200, Ove Ewerlid wrote: > I vote -1 for enabling plain text authentication allowing auth > directly against hashes. I'm not clear if this functionality exists > in ACS4.0, I would assume not. > > The API breakage reported was in createUser, where the ability to

About testing of OVS Tunnel Manager, Fail on create new instance

Hi all, According to the design document of OVS Tunnel Manager (https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/ovs-tunnel-manager-for-cloudstack.html), I have configured “sdn.ovs.controller” to true, and create one advanced zone with one physical network whose isolation method is “GRE”. Advacned zone is cre

Re: Review Request: Added PlainTextAuthenticator

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11194/#review20644 --- This should not be merged until consensus on the approach is reached

Re: Review Request: Added PlainTextAuthenticator

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 04:03:14PM +0200, Ove Ewerlid wrote: > I vote -1 for enabling plain text authentication allowing auth > directly against hashes. I'm not clear if this functionality exists > in ACS4.0, I would assume not. > > The API breakage reported was in createUser, where the ability to

Re: Review Request: Added PlainTextAuthenticator

I vote -1 for enabling plain text authentication allowing auth directly against hashes. I'm not clear if this functionality exists in ACS4.0, I would assume not. The API breakage reported was in createUser, where the ability to pass in a hash has value. Think migration scenarios where only the

Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 03:59:06PM +0200, nicolas.lamira...@orange.com wrote: > Le 16/05/2013 15:56, Chip Childers a écrit : > >If we were able to upgrade you correctly to 4.1, but security groups were > >not yet > >functional, would that suffice? > > yes. Anthony, Since VMware support for SG's

Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2

Le 16/05/2013 15:56, Chip Childers a écrit : If we were able to upgrade you correctly to 4.1, but security groups were not yet functional, would that suffice? yes. -- Nicolas Lamirault ___

Re: Review Request: Change unit of network statistics from 1000 to 1024 for KVM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11195/ --- (Updated May 16, 2013, 1:57 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes

Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 03:53:31PM +0200, nicolas.lamira...@orange.com wrote: > Our PROD is in 2.2.13, using Advaned Zone and SG enabled. > But we don't use SG features. We use vmWare. > We try to upgrade our pre-production environment to 4.1, but we > failed due to the CLOUDSTACK-2463 bug. > We ha

Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2

Our PROD is in 2.2.13, using Advaned Zone and SG enabled. But we don't use SG features. We use vmWare. We try to upgrade our pre-production environment to 4.1, but we failed due to the CLOUDSTACK-2463 bug. We have not managed to update 4.0, and we would pass the 4.1. Le 15/05/2013 21:25, Chip C

RE: [ACS42] System VM's are failed to start with NPE with latest master(VMWARE)

Thanks Kishan for the quick fix provided with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2544 . Regards, Sailaja.M From: Kishan Kavala Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 6:35 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Sailaja Mada Subject: RE: [ACS42] System VM

Re: Review Request: Change unit of network statistics from 1000 to 1024 for KVM

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 01:42:39PM +, Wei Zhou wrote: > > > > On May 16, 2013, 1:39 p.m., Chip Childers wrote: > > > Is there a bug ID for this? And is there a branch target(s) for the > > > patch? > > Chip, > > no Bug ID. The target branch are master and 4.1. Mind putting a bug into the

Re: Review Request: Change unit of network statistics from 1000 to 1024 for KVM

> On May 16, 2013, 1:39 p.m., Chip Childers wrote: > > Is there a bug ID for this? And is there a branch target(s) for the patch? Chip, no Bug ID. The target branch are master and 4.1. - Wei --- This is an automatically generated e-ma

Re: Review Request: Change unit of network statistics from 1000 to 1024 for KVM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11195/#review20641 --- Is there a bug ID for this? And is there a branch target(s) for the

Review Request: Fixed adding route for mgmt subnet in vmware

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11201/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, Murali Reddy, and anthony xu.

RE: Review Request: Added PlainTextAuthenticator

> -Original Message- > From: Ove Ewerlid [mailto:ove.ewer...@oracle.com] > Sent: Thursday, 16 May 2013 6:25 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Review Request: Added PlainTextAuthenticator > > On 05/16/2013 02:16 PM, Kishan Kavala wrote: > > Ove, > >Plain text authentic

Re: Review Request: Implicit dedication of resources to an account

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11045/ --- (Updated May 16, 2013, 1:15 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Prachi Daml

Re: Review Request: Implicit dedication of resources to an account

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11045/ --- (Updated May 16, 2013, 1:14 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Prachi Daml

RE: [ACS42] System VM's are failed to start with NPE with latest master(VMWARE)

It happens only when Vm is staring for the first time irrespective of the hypervisor. This is due to 6d57393629bb93fbf0944e462c841f245b40f919. Below check on CapacityManagerImpl.java:684 should change from if (vm.getLastHostId().equals(vm.getHostId())) { to if (vm.getHostId().equals(vm.getLast

Re: Review Request: Added PlainTextAuthenticator

On 05/16/2013 02:16 PM, Kishan Kavala wrote: Ove, Plain text authenticator will allow logging using the hash value. Or else, clients sending MD5 hash will fail to login. This is primarily for backward compatibility. To avoid logging in using has value itself, plain text authenticator can be

Re: Jira Karma

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Dave Brosius wrote: > Greetings, > >Would someone be kind enough to give me Jira Karma to assign myself to > issues? > > > username: dbrosius > Done

RE: [ACS42] System VM's are failed to start with NPE with latest master(VMWARE)

I saw the same issue with Xen. Thanks, Likitha >-Original Message- >From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com] >Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 5:54 PM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Cc: Sailaja Mada >Subject: Re: [ACS42] System VM's are failed to start with NPE with latest >master(V

RE: [ACS42] System VM's are failed to start with NPE with latest master(VMWARE)

Am using new system vm template. Am on latest master. Its working fine for me. > -Original Message- > From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 5:46 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Sailaja Mada > Subject: Re: [ACS42] System VM's are failed to

RE: Review Request: Added PlainTextAuthenticator

Ove, Plain text authenticator will allow logging using the hash value. Or else, clients sending MD5 hash will fail to login. This is primarily for backward compatibility. To avoid logging in using has value itself, plain text authenticator can be removed from auth adapter list, provided the cl

Re: [ACS42] System VM's are failed to start with NPE with latest master(VMWARE)

Is this only for vmware ? Did you try other hypervisors since it looks generic enough ? On 16/05/13 5:19 PM, "Sailaja Mada" wrote: >Hi, > >With latest master , System VM's are failed to start with NPE. Is there >any issue with recent fixes ? ( VMWARE) > >2013-05-16 17:12:20,523 DEBUG [cloud.capa

Jira Karma

Greetings, Would someone be kind enough to give me Jira Karma to assign myself to issues? username: dbrosius

Review Request: Fix router tests for basic zone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11197/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Description --- Don'

Re: Review Request: Added PlainTextAuthenticator

Hi Kishan! Did you verify that adding the plain text authenticator will not allow login using the hash value itself? from AccountManagerImpl.java; ... getUserAccount ... ... boolean authenticated = false; for(UserAuthenticator authenticator : _userAuthenticators) { i

[ACS42] System VM's are failed to start with NPE with latest master(VMWARE)

Hi, With latest master , System VM's are failed to start with NPE. Is there any issue with recent fixes ? ( VMWARE) 2013-05-16 17:12:20,523 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) release cpu from host: 1, old used: 0,reserved: 0, actual total: 9572, total with overprovi

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2354) Unable to create Windows VMs using ISO

This is more related to the xenserver memory constraints on guest vms, I'm gonna fix this based on the constraints provided by the xenserver. On 16-May-2013, at 5:00 PM, Sanjay Tripathi wrote: > Nitin, > > I have unassigned this ticket as it is related to your feature "Scaling up > Memory of

RE: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2354) Unable to create Windows VMs using ISO

Nitin, I have unassigned this ticket as it is related to your feature "Scaling up Memory of running VMs" and the fix for this bug is disabling the scaling up functionality. I have updated the ticket with my findings. Can you please assign it to yourself as you have the better idea about the fu

RE: [ACS41] Current blocker status

> -Original Message- > From: Kishan Kavala [mailto:kishan.kav...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, 16 May 2013 1:24 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [ACS41] Current blocker status > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] >

Review Request: Added PlainTextAuthenticator

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11194/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers. Summary (updated)

Review Request: remove the dependency on config file in the test_secondary_storage.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11196/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Description --- Get

Review Request: Change unit of network statistics from 1000 to 1024 for KVM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11195/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Description --- As the unit of network stat

RE: [ACS41] Current blocker status

> -Original Message- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, 16 May 2013 12:39 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ACS41] Current blocker status > > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:51:06AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > On Wed, May 15, 2013 a

Re: [ACS41] Current blocker status

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:51:06AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 03:07:41PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > CLOUDSTACK-2516 > > > Create User API compability broken now > > > > > > Nobody has taken this on yet. > > [Animesh>] I will update the JIRA ticket, looks