Cdi query stuff would be great too
Le 1 juin 2013 13:12, "Mark Struberg" a écrit :
> Yes should mainly be a bugfix release with only a few new features.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> >
> > From: John D. Ament
> >To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org; Mark Struberg
> >Cc
Idem, not blocking IMO and bval 1.1 is coming so would be useless soon
Le 1 juin 2013 15:56, "Gerhard Petracek" a
écrit :
> hi john,
>
> codi doesn't do auto registration. you need @Advanced to enable it.
>
> if you aren't allowed to use bv 1.1 right know, you can just use
> BeanProvider manually
uld be possible (via
> >> > >> > default-provider + the corresponding classloading-config for the
> >> > > server
> >> > >> you
> >> > >> > are using).
> >> > >> > if you are not allowed to
Hi
We support a nice jsf navigation (strong typed) but i wonder if we shouldnt
look in our config (config resolver) if the page name is not overrided. It
would allow to use templates easily.
Wdyt?
If we do it we need to orefix the properties as for global alternatives.
license
> for WebLogic?) and sometimes because of company reasons.
>
> Thus I'm +1 for adding it as _optional_ feature.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> >
> > From: Romain Manni-Bucau
> >To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org
>
let features are getting added, but JMS and
> BeanVal seemed to cause disdain in the group (not sure if it's who proposed
> it or the lack of use of these specs).
>
> John
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau >wrote:
>
>
.config.view.View$DefaultFileNameBuilder
> and/or
> org.apache.deltaspike.jsf.api.config.view.View$DefaultExtensionBuilder
>
> to configure your own implementation/s.
>
> (if it makes sense, we can provide multiple implementations and users just
> configure whatever they need.)
>
&g
+1,
ear = 1 app so having 2 project stages would lead to stupid issues IMO
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibu
written and matching less features
than cdi-query itself.
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https:
the
entitymanager already used - if not try to add in your
persistence.xml?
PS: sorry was not able to build your project with my current network
connection
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github
Would be great to get the snapshot running, it uses owb 1.2
Le 5 juin 2013 02:01, "John D. Ament" a écrit :
> Hi Thomas
>
> Good news, upgrading to 1.5.2 changed me from 18 errors and 4 failures to
> 13 errors (or some number like that).
>
> Hi Mark, Romain,
>
> Here's a gist to get you looking
>
need to be able to deactivate not needed listeners. Other config
can break modules relying on it so it could prevent lib to use this module.
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau
alAlternative prefix makes me think to it) so we'd need a web prefix
probably.
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rma
ush a bit more your explanations please).
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannib
+1
i prefer the tomee version since you explicitely see that's a blog stream
but i'm not opposed to OWB layout
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
+1, we released 0.4 so i'd say too late
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://githu
Jpa-repository sounds fine as a jpa submodule for me
Le 14 juin 2013 19:56, "John D. Ament" a écrit :
> i thought it was a separate module from JPA at inception.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Jason Porter >wrote:
>
> > Sounds like we need to create a new module for this, or put it into
As a short name bval is fine but maybe too close of apache impl. So id use
bean-validation. Being explicit is good when naming things
Le 16 juin 2013 15:25, "John D. Ament" a écrit :
> Hi all
>
> One of the comments in the introduction of a Bean Validation module is that
> the name I gave it isn'
whatever the list is IMO, the point was already mentionned: how many times
did you use "bv" to say bean validation? You never say "Java Persistence
API" but always jpa, for bval that's the opposite IMO.
I commonly see bval or beanvalidation but not others.
*Rom
even when speaking?
Then the point is who should understand the name, the EG or users.
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in
specs and/or dev them you don't
know what it is.
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://gi
works for me, so waiting for the vote
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibu
-1
Le 17 juin 2013 02:49, "John D. Ament" a écrit :
> This way we can just sum up the total.
> On Jun 16, 2013 8:46 PM, "Jason Porter" wrote:
>
> > This a little odd way of doing a vote, but whatever :)
> >
> >
> > -1 I prefer bean-validation, it aligns exactly with the name.
> >
> > —
> > Sent
Welcome Thomas!
Le 22 juin 2013 18:16, "Mark Struberg" a écrit :
> The Apache DeltaSpike Team is happy to announce the addition of Thomas Hug
> as new committer.
>
> Thomas will contribute the CDI-Query module and might also help in other
> areas.
>
> Welcome on board, Thomas!
>
> Sincerly,
> the
bly needs another discuss
thread but i'll let JL open it
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github
+1
just to complete this thread the main issue is not the implementation but
the exposed API:
public interface EntityRepository
would become
public interface EntityDtoRepository
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog:
do you mean you force forEntity = Person.class?
looks ok for me since the only constraint is to add the dto types somewhere
:)
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/&g
globally my answer meant "if forEntity is sometimes mandatory, sometimes
not this is maybe not the right place"
i thought to add it to mapper config
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.word
Cause in REST you can push your entities to your REST endpoints then simply
convert it to DTO, that's a stateless case which work but not that general.
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress
t; A DAO should do DAO stuff.
> >> A DTO should do DTO stuff.
> >>
> >> The transformation of your entities into some other POJO shouldn't be
> >> inside your DAO.
> >>
> >> Right now, I use google guava to do DTO work on entities going back and
&g
Ps: you can make a cdi bean an ejb from cdi extension
Le 12 juil. 2013 08:12, "Romain Manni-Bucau" a
écrit :
> Hi
>
> Depending the case DTO are not an option.
>
> I agree in rest app i wouldnt it but if not possible (maybe through
> another Bean) it would kill this m
dify
what is returned, nothing more.
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
I think so too, this is not a main feature of DS IMO
Le 11 août 2013 16:43, "John D. Ament" a écrit :
> Well, it looks like Glassfish 4 is shipping with 2.0.0.SP1.
>
> Maybe we can just list this as a known limitation?
>
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> > Hi folks!
> >
>
+1
Btw wonder if using java brace style shouldnt be done too (same line as
class, method...instead of a new line)
Le 9 sept. 2013 07:16, "Christian Kaltepoth" a
écrit :
> I like the idea of checking this automatically. So +1 for that.
>
>
> 2013/9/9 John D. Ament
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like
+1
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
2013/9/11 Mark Struberg
Hi
I dont get the need, using cdi event + repo looks enough. What do I miss?
Le 14 sept. 2013 02:04, "Jason Porter" a écrit :
> I was looking at
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18774025/how-can-i-update-a-collection-that-is-produces-applicationscoped
> and
> the data module came to my min
t simply with an annotation or class or
> something similar.
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I dont get the need, using cdi event + repo looks enough. What do I miss?
> > Le 14 sept. 2013 02:04, &quo
)
backing a TestConfigSource.
The question now: do we provide a default impl answering this need? (maybe
an in memory configuration == map/properties updatable through a static
method)
wdyt?
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog:
It would be a contextual config so in the case of arquillian you'd set it
in the beginning of your test method.
The point is not if it works but if we can/should support it.
typically how to configure a webservice client url when the port is random?
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmanni
aybe I'm missing
> something.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> > It would be a contextual config so in the case of arquillian you'd set it
> > in the beginning of your test method.
> >
> > The point is not i
ts will be
> different in environments).
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Jason Porter
> wrote:
> > Ah, okay. Now I see.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Yep but the app doesnt know
revents you from registering an own
> ThreadLocalTestConfigSource which you add as to your tomee, right?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: Romain Manni-Bucau
> > To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Wednes
Yep, I'll ping him today on IRC
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibu
Hi
any news on it?
@ResultMapper was good to me
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https:
Not particularly
the thread ends while the feature is useful IMO so simply asking what to do
next ;)
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.
Hi,
in org.apache.deltaspike.data.impl.handler.EntityManagerLookup#lookupFor we
use the em resolver then we return the entityManager.get() instead of the
result. Is it intended?
Why not using a qualifier to resolve the em? It was easier IMO
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <ht
?
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
2013/10/2 Thomas Hug
> Hi Romain,
+1, same for @ConfigProperty btw
Le 3 oct. 2013 20:49, "Gerhard Petracek" a
écrit :
> -0.5 for now
> once we add more, you get the same and it would be not that expressive.
> that was the reason for changing it (compared to codi).
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2013/10/3 Thomas Andraschko
>
> >
10/3 Thomas Andraschko
>
> > @Gerhard: Are there any expected properties on @ViewRef in the future?
> >
> >
> > 2013/10/3 Romain Manni-Bucau
> >
> > > +1, same for @ConfigProperty btw
> > > Le 3 oct. 2013 20:49, "Gerhard Petracek"
> a
&
lessons learned from using it in projects and
> explaining it in trainings for almost three years.
> what we have right now just reflects the feedback.
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2013/10/3 Romain Manni-Bucau
>
> > If config is the unique mandatory attr it sh
Both works Mark depending as you said from where you take your em. We just
need to be explicit on this behavior. BTW I prefer the normal scope usage
too.
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
art for me.
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
2013/10/10 Mark Stru
@Mark: if we add the constraint to not use other scoped injections it would
work...but I agree it is maybe a big constraint since the em will often be
@ReqScoped
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
@AppScope will work for sure but other scopes would need to be
initialized/resetted. There isn't enough link between jsr 236 and cdi to
suppose it but CDI tend to impose container to start request/session scopes
if not already started so I think it can work out of the box, no?
*Romain Manni-
Well if code is released it should be stable or explicitely in
alpha/beta..maybe we should do subreleases for unstables modules
Le 11 nov. 2013 18:43, "Mark Struberg" a écrit :
> Oki folks, txs 4 the feedback, all!
>
>
> I'd say we should create the module-maturity-matrix.md first and then we
> m
+1 for v1. If we don't go back (= we don't make unstable stable
modules) it is enough IMO
docs and stability a priority!).
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >On 11 Nov 2013, at 23:09, Gerhard Petracek
> > > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> if we move to v1 soon, we
+1 Works for me, thks
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/11/15 Thomas Hug :
> One question is probably whether it's worth adding somethin
omaticManagedRuntime.java?av=f
. This is great cause make it working with 0 config in a JavaEE
server.
wdyt?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
BTW to make some code on 2): https://gist.github.com/rmannibucau/7564089
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/11/20 Romain Manni-Bucau :
> Hi
>
> te
n for that purpose?
To summarize:
1) do we allow to configure though an annotation the fact single
result query return null if the entity is not ofund?
2) do we add in the data-api an exception when 1) throws an exception
to be able to catch it?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rm
sounds great, thks!
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/11/22 Thomas Hug :
> Hi Romain
> 1) relates to DELTASPIKE-421. Started to prototype something
+1
I'd remove both line btw:
e.printStackTrace();
log.log(Level.SEVERE, "Query execution error", e);
i'd keep the log in FINEST level
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github
, Thomas Hug wrote:
>
> > Oops, good catch, that one sneaked in.
> >
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Freitag, 22. November 2013 16:13
> > To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org
> > Subject: R
I was written it in my previous mail then thought nobody will use it. Too
low level IMO
Le 22 nov. 2013 19:15, "Jason Porter" a écrit :
> Do we want to / should we have exceptioncontrol integration here?
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
things.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> > I was written it in my previous mail then thought nobody will use it. Too
> > low level IMO
> > Le 22 nov. 2013 19:15, "Jason Porter" a écrit
> :
> >
> > >
That's exactly the question ;)
Le 22 nov. 2013 19:51, "Jason Porter" a écrit :
> I think it only makes sense to integrate our own features.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> > Then the question is the same as for
Why not just supporting @eager, doing a tostring in
afterdeploymentvalidation should do the trick
Le 27 nov. 2013 13:15, "Thomas Andraschko" a
écrit :
> Gerhard, one question about the system events.
> We could also do somelike like (@Observers @ViewRef(config = MyView.class)
> PreRenderViewEvent
we have something like it in openejb and it is really nicer than
arquillian for real apps and unit tests since you don't need
deployment or heavy enrichments processes
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmanni
Which gain supporting testng?
Testng supports junit iirc
Le 2 déc. 2013 18:11, "Christian Kaltepoth" a
écrit :
> I really like this. So +1 for adding it. Great work Gerhard. :)
>
> And I agree with Mark that we should also support TestNG later. So the
> module name should indicate that it is JUn
well I asked cause I used it and found something to replace in junit
for everything (all you speak about)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/12/2 Mark
Oh, so something else ;).
I'm +0 on this feature since IMO JavaEE 6 offers what is needed but I
understand your constraint
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmanni
Hi
what is issing in JavaEE 6 for you (TimerService already allows a lot)?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/12/3 Nathan Dennis :
> Beyond what JEE6 T
+-0 while deltaspike doesnt use itself the bom (they lead too often to dep
issues in practise)
Le 23 déc. 2013 02:09, "John D. Ament" a écrit :
> Hi all
>
> Recently for the binary distribution task, I added a bom. I added
> this because the parent pom includes our dependencies, as well as our
>
@john: I guess the issue you got with tomee is linked to the
dependencies in DS more than to tomee itself (answered your jira)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
-0 both injections can be different depending on containers using some
advanced stuff out of ee but affecting ee lifecycle (at least in tomcat)
but your proposal sounds acceptable.
Le 3 janv. 2014 17:58, "Thomas Andraschko" a
écrit :
> Hi,
>
> IMHO @Web is somehow annoying.
> HttpServlet e.g. is
well in fact I saw a lot of cdi 1.0 app producing http* objects
without qualifier cause it was missing in cdi so conflicts can occurs
and are quite common
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https
replacement. I know it is doable but needs to
update the app and can break "big apps" where you aggregate multiple
parts.
Having a namespace should be a best practise IMHO.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibu
@gerhard: @Decorator is broken in 85% of the case and doesn't work
with producers IIRC
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014/1/4 Gerhard Petracek :
>
so didnt get your comment on decorators...
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014/1/4 Gerhard Petracek :
> @romain:
> you should do the wrapping like you
never said it was blocking, just it shouldn't be done blindly and docs
should be very explicit on it and potential conflict (usually we don't
care to not mention we don't use a qualifier, here we do).
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
+0
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014/1/7 Thomas Andraschko :
> Hi all,
>
> based on the discusstion in "Servlet Module - Do we really need @
I'd release 0.6 before having it, it will surely create discussion
once we'll get something and it is easy to do something totally
brokenn in particular when we'll want to get something clever in a web
context
btw we shouldn't do it without pivotal IMO
Romain Manni-Bucau
T
is a lot to get nothing fancy and surely slow.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014/1/23 Charles Moulliard :
> -1. Why would you like to support Spring Integra
Hi
I see the use case but deltaspike needs so much work on existing code (jsf,
security, transactional, data for the one I see) that I think we shouldnt
add new things while we dont propose something working fine out of the box.
Wdyt?
Le 7 févr. 2014 02:31, "John D. Ament" a écrit :
> Hi all
>
HI
You want to intercept the test? so it means the runner needs to invoke
"business" methods of the test class which is not the case by default
(ie result shouldn't be built from a newInstance() but from a
beanManager.getXXX()).
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannib
is you test class scanned by cdi? I mean did you provide a
META-INF/beans.xml for tests?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-02-07 :
> Hello Rom
@JL it should be running with snapshot too
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-02-07 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO :
> Sure, I cannot commit, so for now, my patch
ld be awesome).
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-02-07 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO :
> +1
> The core is very stable.
> Users are afraid by 0.5 or 0.6 in te
Side note: you can also use a JUnit @Rule ;)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-02-07 Gerhard Petracek :
> hi heiko,
>
> you can use CdiT
test-control could be renamed cdi-unit or something like it IMHO
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-02-10 11:28 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek :
> i would
While it works with JTA it is ok for me, I think it should be
compatible with our @Transactional and EE 7 one. I think reusing
@Transactional is important in declaration (on method) so maybe the
way to go.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn
well I don't agree on modules hierarchy which looks inconsistent but I
dont really care while code is here but I agree with Mark names are
already used 'in fact it is true for this and for core) so we
shouldn't change it anymore.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannib
y too much used so we have 1.0 constraints already. Only new
modules don't have them.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-02-14 10:46 GMT+01:00 Gerhard P
that's the main point of the discussion I think. We are consistent
with what we said but users can't wait for years so we are too used to
maintain it.
+1 for a vote
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/r
+0 for position
-1 for name or maven coordinates
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-02-14 13:21 GMT+01:00 :
> Seems this way. I think this whole dicuss
gt; Otherwise it will probably not happen...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2014-02-14 15:04 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek <
> gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
> >> >:
> >> >
> >> >> +1 for changing the name and location of cdic
Hi Thomas,
would be great to get it in 0.6, any idea if it would be possible? I
should be able to help once decided and if needed.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com
;m less confident
is with current @Tx impl we can't force a new transaction so we
doesn't cover all needed case. But should be enough to start.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://git
Hi
can we wait 1 or 2 weeks (no more) to see if we can sort out @Repo/@Tx
stuff? Basically I'm waiting after it for months and this is blocker
to be used ATM.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
G
1 - 100 of 559 matches
Mail list logo
