Re: 5.3.2 bug fix release

what's the status of 5.3.2 release ? On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Anshum Gupta wrote: > Thanks for committing those David. > > I just brought everything in synch on the 5.3.2 change log section on all > the branches. > > I have also committed everything but I want to also commit SOLR-8470 bef

Re: 5.3.2 bug fix release

Thanks for committing those David. I just brought everything in synch on the 5.3.2 change log section on all the branches. I have also committed everything but I want to also commit SOLR-8470 before cutting the RC (unless someone objects). In case someone has something else to back port, kindly d

Re: 5.3.2 bug fix release

Yikes; I’m sure that was painful. So I just back-ported a couple issues, SOLR-8340 & SOLR-8059. I was about to manually keep the 5.3.2 section in branch_5x & trunk in sync but then thought better of it. Might as well wait until 5.3.2 is voted and then do it, since there are bound to be others wh

Re: 5.3.2 bug fix release

Sorry for the long delay but I burnt my hand and so have been MIA. It's better now so I'll port the issues and cut an RC on Wednesday. On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Anshum Gupta wrote: > I've added the section for 5.3.2 in all the branches. Kindly back-port > stuff that you think makes sense

Re: 5.3.2 bug fix release

I've added the section for 5.3.2 in all the branches. Kindly back-port stuff that you think makes sense to go into a 'bug-fix' release for 5.3.1 only. I think it'd make sense to duplicate entries for JIRAs we back port. On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Anshum Gupta wrote: > Seems like Noble ra

Re: 5.3.2 bug fix release

Seems like Noble ran addVersion.py for 5.3.2 on the lucene_solr_5_3 branch during the 5.3.1 release. I can now run it for branch_5x and trunk with the old change id but there are a ton of property changes to multiple files. Can someone confirm that it'd be fine? The addVersion on 5.3.2, that I'm tr

Re: 5.3.2 bug fix release

I’d like to backport SOLR-8059 & SOLR-8060 (same as SOLR-8340): NPEs that can happen in DebugComponent & HighlightComponent when distrib.singlePass=true (which is implied under certain conditions even if not explicitly =true). On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 8:54 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > If there is a 5.

Re: 5.3.2 bug fix release

If there is a 5.3.2 release, we should probably also backport this one: SOLR-8269 : Upgrade commons-collections to 3.2.2. This fixes a known serialization vulnerability -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > 1

Re: 5.3.2 bug fix release

Yes, there was already a 5.3.2 version in JIRA. I will start back-porting stuff to the lucene_solr_5_3 branch later in the day today. On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Noble Paul wrote: > Agree with Shawn here. > > If a company has already done the work to upgrade their systems to > 5.3.1 , the

Re: 5.3.2 bug fix release

Agree with Shawn here. If a company has already done the work to upgrade their systems to 5.3.1 , they would rather have a bug fix for the old version . So anshum, is there a 5.3.2 version created in JIRA? can we start tagging issues to that release so that we can have a definitive list of bugs t

Re: 5.3.2 bug fix release

Thanks for explaining it so well Shawn :) Yes, that's pretty much the reason why it makes sense to have a 5.3.2 release. We might even need a 5.4.1 after that as there are more security bug fixes that are getting committed as the feature is being tried by users and bugs are being reported. On Th

Re: 5.3.2 bug fix release

On 12/16/2015 2:15 PM, Upayavira wrote: > Why don't people just upgrade to 5.4? Why do we need another release in > the 5.3.x range? I am using a third-party custom Solr plugin. The latest version of that plugin (which I have on my dev server) has only been certified to work with Solr 5.3.x. The

Re: 5.3.2 bug fix release

Historical aside: I was thinking we’d never produced a bugfix release on a previous minor branch, but I went looking and found that 4.9.1, released 9/21/14, was just such a one: 4.10.0 was released on 9/4/14. AFAICT Mike McCandless initially proposed a 4.9.1 release on 9/16/14 here:

Re: 5.3.2 bug fix release

Anshum, If there happens to be a security bugfix release, I'd like to have SOLR-8373 included as well. It is a deal breaker for anyone who uses Kerberos support and wants to have more than one solr node per host. Thanks, Ishan On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Upayavira wrote: > Why don't people

Re: 5.3.2 bug fix release

Why don't people just upgrade to 5.4? Why do we need another release in the 5.3.x range? Upayavira On Wed, Dec 16, 2015, at 09:12 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 12/16/2015 1:08 PM, Anshum Gupta wrote: > > There are a bunch of important bug fixes that call for a 5.3.2 in my > > opinion. I'm specific

Re: 5.3.2 bug fix release

On 12/16/2015 1:08 PM, Anshum Gupta wrote: > There are a bunch of important bug fixes that call for a 5.3.2 in my > opinion. I'm specifically talking about security plugins related fixes > but I'm sure there are others too. > > Unless someone else wants to do it, I'd volunteer to do the release > a

5.3.2 bug fix release

There are a bunch of important bug fixes that call for a 5.3.2 in my opinion. I'm specifically talking about security plugins related fixes but I'm sure there are others too. Unless someone else wants to do it, I'd volunteer to do the release and cut an RC next Tuesday. -- Anshum Gupta