On 2/12/13 12:03 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 11/02/2013 Hagar Delest wrote:
No real problem with reinstalling extensions after a major upgrade, I've
done that too.
But there is a difference between the mere inconvenience of reinstalling
extensions and losing them completely (waiting that
On 2/12/13 12:41 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net
wrote:
Le 11/02/2013 22:46, Rob Weir a écrit :
My impression was that even if we made no changes, from the user's
perspective, they would lose all extensions. This is due to the
On 12 February 2013 12:42, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
I just did a basic test, seeing how long it took to load a large text
document, in this case the ODF 1.2 specification. I looked at memory
consumed and the number of seconds to load. I loaded the document
once to reduce the
Good morning. It is posted now.
The URL is: http://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/21_million_per_day
Regards,
-Rob
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Sally Khudairi sallykhuda...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks so much, Rob. I'd prefer we go out at 8AM ET on Tuesday. I think
we'll get the most media
On 2/12/13 1:42 PM, Joost Andrae wrote:
Hi,
in the moment I have just one question in mind:
Who's going to adapt the Sun/Oracle extensions that contain Addons.xcu
like presentation-minimizer.oxt ?
well the extensions where we have the source code can be changed by
volunteers. Maybe
Hi Andrea,
Am 05.02.2013 22:34, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Do you mean that not only you wish that OpenOffice export fields as
enterable fields (which it already does) but that the PDF file
produced by OpenOffice should also support the ability to save form
content? But is this ability a
Posted https://twitter.com/TheASF/status/301315097794596867
...as well as sent to our media/analyst list :-)
Cheers,
Sally
From: Sally Khudairi sallykhuda...@yahoo.com
To: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: Sally Khudairi s...@apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 7 February
Regina Henschel schrieb:
I have written to Mathias Stürmer and ask, how to get the patches.
I have got a private answers and waiting for the permission to share it.
Kind regards
Regina
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 07:42:49 Rob Weir wrote:
I did some tests to see how we were doing, comparing AOO 3.4.1 on
Windows against OOo 3.3.0. And since LibreOffice claims that their
4.0 release is much faster and leaner, I tested them as well, to see
if we could learn anything.
I
Andrew
I think that binaries URL should be he following, at least for accessing
the binaries.
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/#w7ia2
As you point out however they are not there yet. Do you have an ETA?
After Stuart's post of the NVDA list there has been quite a bit of
discussion and
On 2/12/13 2:15 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:07:59 +0100
Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/12/13 1:42 PM, Joost Andrae wrote:
Hi,
in the moment I have just one question in mind:
Who's going to adapt the Sun/Oracle extensions that contain Addons.xcu
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 01:42:42PM +0100, Joost Andrae wrote:
Hi,
in the moment I have just one question in mind:
Who's going to adapt the Sun/Oracle extensions that contain
Addons.xcu like presentation-minimizer.oxt ?
This extension does not provide a toolbar of its own, it uses only
On 11/02/2013 Andre Fischer wrote:
On 11.02.2013 17:10, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
A specification may need to leave room for implementation-defined
behavior. Look at the C or C++ standard for example.
Do you know of any example where this is actually a good thing?
It is good for developers who
...So I got curious, and I paged back in my email archive, and it
seems this is the biggest AOO dev thread since the graduation vote
back in early September.
At this point, does anyone care enough about changing the status quo
as to put up a coherent proposal to be voted on?
Don
I want to circle back and complete the relationship, if any, between the
specifications of computations procedures and mathematics.
First, there is no prohibition between defining any number of algorithms as
computations on computer-representations of numbers. Mathematics allows all
sort of
RESOLUTION OF THE PROPOSAL
The proposed change was made under CTR (Commit then Review). There has been
a subsequent review and, as Don points out, the discussion has been lengthy
and vocal.
The objective is to achieve consensus. I believe it is clear that there is
no consensus on the proposed
When I look at the preceding mail in this thread, I see a lot of god
suggestionsbut it seems its all still open, or did I miss a point.
Regarding streamlining Mwiki,
- there are no real proposals to reduce the number of catagories
- it seems that everybody agrees on marking old pages
Hello;
I don't understand,
I saw a bug (erroneous result returned by a function) and I fixed
it respecting the standards, thereby enhancing interperability
with the market leader.
I am aware that Rob has a different point of view here but so
far neither him nor Stephen Hawking has explained how
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hello;
I don't understand,
I saw a bug (erroneous result returned by a function) and I fixed
it respecting the standards, thereby enhancing interperability
with the market leader.
I am aware that Rob has a different
Select column in Calc
as I can select from Python
the value of a particular column in Calc
or is necessary for the user to select?
regards
--
*Galileo Teco Juarez*
*Web:* http://80bits.wordpress.com
*Twitter:* @genitalico http://twitter.com/genitalico
*Linkedin:*
sorry mistake
of translations
this is the real question
*how can i select the value of a colum in a specific cell. ie, select the
value of 10 from the B4 cell*
2013/2/12 Galileo Teco Juárez genital...@gmail.com
Select column in Calc
as I can select from Python
the value of a particular
Ugh..
I haven't been following this thread at all ...
I unsubscribed from the -dev list because I always ended up in absurd
discussions
and there was not much technical content either.
I suspected it would be bikeshed.org material but in any case let me make
things clear.
- 0^0 = 1 is NOT
The current behavior is in compliance with the ODF 1.2 OpenFormula
specification. In that context, the current result for POWER(0,0) is not a
bug.
The fact that 0^0 is not defined (nor are 0^-n values) in mathematics
(although some define them for various conveniences) does not mean it can't
be
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Ugh..
I haven't been following this thread at all ...
I recommend reading the archives then, since every argument that could
be made, has been made already.
-Rob
I unsubscribed from the -dev list because I always ended
Am 02/12/2013 08:46 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Pedro Giffunip...@apache.org wrote:
Hello;
I don't understand,
I saw a bug (erroneous result returned by a function) and I fixed
it respecting the standards, thereby enhancing interperability
with the market leader.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 02/12/2013 08:46 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Pedro Giffunip...@apache.org wrote:
Hello;
I don't understand,
I saw a bug (erroneous result returned by a function) and I fixed
it
Le 12/02/2013 22:31, Marcus (OOo) a écrit :
Some facts from the issue itself:
- open since 2010-09-09
- only 2 votes (from author of comment #2)
Now 4 with mines.
Hagar
Le 12/02/2013 00:45, Fred Ollinger a écrit :
Another idea is to return 1, but have a popup which says: We are
returning 1 to 0^0 due to backwards compatability, but we this might
change in the fure. Click here to never show this warning again and
continue to return 1. Also, you can use strict
http://lasvegassuites.org/downrightawesome.com/nanw54.php?s=ot
http://lasvegassuites.org/downrightawesome.com/nanw54.php?s=ot
Am 02/12/2013 10:39 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 02/12/2013 08:46 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Pedro Giffunip...@apache.org wrote:
Hello;
I don't understand,
I saw a bug (erroneous result
We had a thread before Christmas discussing code contributions and
best practices for how someone could contribute code to multiple
projects, e.g., AOO and LO.
I've written this up, along with more general remarks on contributing
code on a new page:
Hello Team,
I followed the steps at
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_ste
p to build AOO but I get an error after about 2 hours of building. The
error reads as follow;
BUILD FAILED
Hello,
My name is Maarten Kesselaers.
I'm from Belgium and work as a project manager and EDI exchange expert.
I used to code (Java, C++ and DOM) and helped other developers on forums, but
I'm up to a new challenge.
That's why I would like to help make AOO better.
Kind regards,
Maarten
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 02/12/2013 10:39 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
wrote:
Am 02/12/2013 08:46 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Pedro
Le 12/02/2013 13:05, Rob Weir a écrit :
I don't know. I was asking a question. But I think this is an
important question: Why would an extension author not update their
extension for AOO 4.0? Some hypothetical answers:
1) The extension is unmaintained
One of the top reasons I guess. I
Am 02/12/2013 11:22 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 02/12/2013 10:39 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
wrote:
Am 02/12/2013 08:46 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Feb 12,
Le 12/02/2013 23:22, Rob Weir a écrit :
But again, if you think that situation never comes up in real use,
then let's not make the change, since it would have no benefit.
You don't seem to see the benefit of the change: warn the user that there is
something weird in the formula that requires
On 12 February 2013 23:19, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
We had a thread before Christmas discussing code contributions and
best practices for how someone could contribute code to multiple
projects, e.g., AOO and LO.
I've written this up, along with more general remarks on contributing
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net wrote:
Le 12/02/2013 13:05, Rob Weir a écrit :
I don't know. I was asking a question. But I think this is an
important question: Why would an extension author not update their
extension for AOO 4.0? Some hypothetical
On 12 February 2013 23:55, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:47 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 12 February 2013 23:19, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
We had a thread before Christmas discussing code contributions and
best practices for how someone could
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 02:18:42PM -0600, Galileo Teco Juárez wrote:
sorry mistake
of translations
this is the real question
*how can i select the value of a colum in a specific cell. ie, select the
value of 10 from the B4 cell*
look at the API index for methods starting with G:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 05:13:00PM -0500, Fernando Martinez wrote:
BUILD FAILED
C:\source\aoo-trunk\main\hsqldb\wntmsci12.pro\misc\build\hsqldb\build\build.
xml:302: Compile failed; see the compiler error output for details.
If anybody could please help with this error and also tell me how
Welcome. have you tried to build the source code yet?
This may be a good starting place
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO
On 02/12/2013 04:13 PM, Maarten Kesselaers wrote:
Hello,
My name is Maarten Kesselaers.
I'm from Belgium and work as a project manager
Do you want to get, take, or obtain the value that is in the cell,
or, do you want to select the cell so that it is the current cell?
On 02/12/2013 03:18 PM, Galileo Teco Juárez wrote:
sorry mistake
of translations
this is the real question
*how can i select the value of a colum in a
Hello Ariel,
I did the patch you told me, but I have not results.
I would like to know what would be the equivalent of a code tutorial about
for this new source code to generate the button.
2013/2/12 Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org
Hi Jorge,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:06:12AM
On 02/12/2013 12:01 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:37:35PM -0500, Michael Lam wrote:
I have updated the external_deps.lst with the updated hsqldb
information. If someone can give me some pointer into how to just
retrieve the jar instead of the source
You don't
Hi Michael,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 09:59:02PM -0500, Michael Lam wrote:
On 02/12/2013 12:01 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:37:35PM -0500, Michael Lam wrote:
I have updated the external_deps.lst with the updated hsqldb
information. If someone can give me some
(OK, I guess it's better to re-subscribe to the list).
In reply to Norbert Thiebaud*:
In the Power rule, which *is* commonly used for differentiation, we take a
series
of polinomials where n !=0. n is not only different than zero, most importantly,
it is a constant.
Of course we can use the
Hi Jorge,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 08:06:11PM -0600, jorge ivan poot diaz wrote:
Hello Ariel,
I did the patch you told me, but I have not results.
Did you build it? Did it compile without errors? Did you copy the
library with the modifications back in your installation? (you need to
copy both
My preference is to leave the patch and return #Value
On 02/12/2013 01:11 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
RESOLUTION OF THE PROPOSAL
The proposed change was made under CTR (Commit then Review). There has been
a subsequent review and, as Don points out, the discussion has been lengthy
and vocal.
On 02/12/2013 05:07 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 02/12/2013 10:39 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
Sorry, if it wasn't clear. I have a spreadsheet on my hard-drive
right now that would be break if we changed the behavior of 0^0.
And what is your *serious* use case for this spreadsheet? Beside to
use it
On 02/12/2013 05:45 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net wrote:
Le 12/02/2013 23:22, Rob Weir a écrit :
But again, if you think that situation never comes up in real use,
then let's not make the change, since it would have no benefit.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Rob Weir rabas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 12, 2013, at 10:39 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
(OK, I guess it's better to re-subscribe to the list).
In reply to Norbert Thiebaud*:
In the Power rule, which *is* commonly used for differentiation, we
54 matches
Mail list logo
