>> Either trunk or AOO42X.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 7:11 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>>> Which branch?
>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 22, 2024, at 10:54 AM, Damjan Jovanovic
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>
> >>> On Feb 22, 2024, at 10:54 AM, Damjan Jovanovic
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> For bug 112829, I got graphics and charts to copy out of AOO in SVG
> >> format
> >>> on FreeBSD and Windows (
Damjan Jovanovic
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> For bug 112829, I got graphics and charts to copy out of AOO in SVG
>> format
>>> on FreeBSD and Windows (and probably Linux), but I wasn't able to test
>>> macOS. A quick look at t
Either trunk or AOO42X.
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 7:11 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Which branch?
>
> > On Feb 22, 2024, at 10:54 AM, Damjan Jovanovic
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > For bug 112829, I got graphics and charts to copy out of AOO in SVG
> forma
Which branch?
> On Feb 22, 2024, at 10:54 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> For bug 112829, I got graphics and charts to copy out of AOO in SVG format
> on FreeBSD and Windows (and probably Linux), but I wasn't able to test
> macOS. A quick look at the code s
Hi
For bug 112829, I got graphics and charts to copy out of AOO in SVG format
on FreeBSD and Windows (and probably Linux), but I wasn't able to test
macOS. A quick look at the code shows we might need another patch to get it
working there, possibly the one below.
Can someone please test i
ardovm merged PR #171:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/171
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apa
Pilot-Pirx commented on PR #171:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/171#issuecomment-1677591807
Any news here?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
T
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grace_Hopper#/media/File:First_Computer_Bug,_1945.jpg
On 30/06/2023 23:05, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
I came across this bit of trivia on a news group I follow:
PS --- don't you love the term "bug". Where I used to work, they had
the late Grace Murr
On Fri, 30 Jun 2023 06:50:05 -0700
Dave Fisher wrote:
> When I was a child I asked my father “why?”and he told me that the bug was a
> cockroach flipping a bit in core memory - which was a grid of wires where
> each bit was a little magnetic donut.
Ah! core memory, where each memory
When I was a child I asked my father “why?”and he told me that the bug was a
cockroach flipping a bit in core memory - which was a grid of wires where each
bit was a little magnetic donut.
Thanks!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 30, 2023, at 6:36 AM, Keith N. McKenna
> wrote:
>
I came across this bit of trivia on a news group I follow:
PS --- don't you love the term "bug". Where I used to work, they had the
late Grace Murray Hopper in to give us a talk every few years. One of
her anecdotes of the early days was how the term came about. One time a
&q
Pilot-Pirx commented on PR #171:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/171#issuecomment-1447352781
Please test! This could be a good addition to our next release.
I an building for Windows now.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the m
leginee commented on PR #171:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/171#issuecomment-1435941891
I do not agree that caching makes sense. If behavior is switched the data
needs to be adjusted too.
IMHO it is better to work with less dynamic Objects. instead instantiate a
new obje
ardovm opened a new pull request, #171:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/171
The purpose of this branch is to fix bug #126680.
All information is on the bug report:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126680
Instances of com.sun.star.i18n.Transliteration.l10n
hat Version of AOO do you use?
Do you have Java 32bit installed?
All the best
Peter
Am 28.12.22 um 14:30 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi all,
FYI
Can anyone confirm/test?
Regards,
Matthias
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff: Bug in Calc - Search and Substitute.
Datum
Can anyone confirm/test?
Regards,
Matthias
Weitergeleitete Nachricht ----
Betreff:Bug in Calc - Search and Substitute.
Datum: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:50:18 +0100
Von:Mauro (GMail)
Antwort an: us...@openoffice.apache.org
An: us...@openoffice.apache.org
:30 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi all,
FYI
Can anyone confirm/test?
Regards,
Matthias
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff:Bug in Calc - Search and Substitute.
Datum: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:50:18 +0100
Von:Mauro (GMail)
Antwort an: us...@openoffice.apache.org
?
I can test Windows in the next days. I have 2 Monitors. I just was not
at home the past days.
yes, the original reporter is working on Windows 10.
Marcus
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff: Bug in Calc - Search and Substitute.
Datum: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:50:18 +0100
have 2 Monitors. I just was not
at home the past days.
Marcus
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff: Bug in Calc - Search and Substitute.
Datum: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:50:18 +0100
Von: Mauro (GMail)
Antwort an: us...@openoffice.apache.org
An: us
Am 28.12.22 um 14:30 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
FYI
Can anyone confirm/test?
maybe a Linux-only issue. On my Linux system with 2 monitors no dialog
boxes or document windows will disappear.
Marcus
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff:Bug in Calc - Search and
Hi all,
FYI
Can anyone confirm/test?
Regards,
Matthias
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff:Bug in Calc - Search and Substitute.
Datum: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:50:18 +0100
Von:Mauro (GMail)
Antwort an: us...@openoffice.apache.org
An: us
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-956639520
https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/win/
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and u
leginee commented on pull request #122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-956629246
As soon as I find a build ;)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
leginee commented on pull request #122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-956629246
As soon as I find a build ;)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-956639520
https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/win/
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and u
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-956639520
https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/win/
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and u
leginee commented on pull request #122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-956629246
As soon as I find a build ;)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-955607076
When? ;-)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific commen
leginee commented on pull request #122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-945085618
Sure.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-945085404
With the code now in trunk, do we want to start testing it?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
leginee edited a comment on pull request #122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-945085021
Sorry, I forgot about it. I wanted to run the code once. I note in my review
the state I have.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To resp
leginee commented on pull request #122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-945085021
Sorry, I forgot about it. I wanted to run the code once.
The code change itself looked fine, from code review perspective.
--
This is an automated message from the
jimjag merged pull request #122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr..
dave2wave commented on pull request #122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-931604791
@leginee @ardovm requested your review.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
ardovm commented on pull request #122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-925836356
> Is this PR ready? Or, have the changes already been merged in a different
PR?
Thank you for checking this! I am still waiting for a review.
I would like to have t
dave2wave commented on pull request #122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-925827397
Is this PR ready? Or, have the changes already been merged in a different PR?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
Hello,
French users confirm this bug: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114001
Occurs with 4.2.0-dev too.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
leginee commented on pull request #122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-792224362
starting with code review.
I like that you have added comments.
This is an automated message from the Apache
ardovm commented on pull request #122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-774489872
Ok, I am done. Reviews welcome!
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mess
ocuments attached to the reports do not seem to trigger the bug any more.
The PR is IMHO production-ready, but I would like to spend some more time on
documentation.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servic
ardovm edited a comment on pull request #122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-774024441
> Is
> `if (!!bAutoStyles)`
> really the best way to format that logical if for
[7af97f4](https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/7af97f4fe332f523912f0174635fb94
ardovm commented on pull request #122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-774024441
> Is
> `if (!!bAutoStyles)`
> really the best way to format that logical if for
[7af97f4](https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/7af97f4fe332f523912f0174635fb94d88995f
jimjag commented on pull request #122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-773990932
Is
`
if (!!bAutoStyles)
`
really the best way to format that logical if for
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122/commits/7af97f4fe332f523912f0174635fb94d8899
ardovm opened a new pull request #122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122
This is a work-in-progress fix for
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128356
Please keep the discussion about the "philosophy" of the patch on Bugzilla.
Code style, variable names, ind
Am 30.01.21 um 12:17 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 22:57 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Maybe you can find something in the Bugzilla configuration that
defines the default QA contact? ...
Sorry, not in BZ itself. I've looked into the admin settings but
cannot find a suitable
Marcus wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 22:57 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Maybe you can find something in the Bugzilla configuration that
defines the default QA contact? ...
Sorry, not in BZ itself. I've looked into the admin settings but cannot
find a suitable option.
I believe our old (and I don't know h
Am 26.01.21 um 22:57 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus wrote:
IMHO we just ned to make sure that isues@ is either the assignee -
this works as long as nobody is taking over the issue for working on
it - or it's in the CC list. Then every update on the issue will be
posted to issues@.
Even thou
x27;s
> in the CC list. Then every update on the issue will be posted to issues@.
I understand.
> I'm quite sure I've done it already, but I've enabled you for the following
> BZ groups in BZ:
>
> canconfirm: Can confirm a bug or mark it a duplicate
> edit
Marcus wrote:
IMHO we just ned to make sure that isues@ is either the assignee - this
works as long as nobody is taking over the issue for working on it - or
it's in the CC list. Then every update on the issue will be posted to
issues@.
Even though I can't really find it in older issues like
x27;s in the CC list. Then every update on the issue will be posted to
issues@.
I'm quite sure I've done it already, but I've enabled you for the
following BZ groups in BZ:
canconfirm: Can confirm a bug or mark it a duplicate
ed
Pilot-Pirx merged pull request #118:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/118
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #118:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/118#issuecomment-767530852
If there are no objections I will merge this code later this day.
This is an automated message from the Apac
Hello,
FWIW...
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 09:10:51PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
[...]
> If I recall correctly, we relied on a "trick" that would set the "QA
> contact" field for any new issues to the issues mailing list. Even if the
> assignee is changed, the "QA contact" is not reset and this m
ardovm opened a new pull request #118:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/118
See [https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125129]
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mess
This seems like a safe and non-controversial fix to me...
> On Jan 7, 2021, at 4:31 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 07:03:19AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> On 6 Jan, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Jan 6, 2021, at 9:19 AM, Arrigo Marchiori
wrot
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 07:03:19AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 6 Jan, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Jan 6, 2021, at 9:19 AM, Arrigo Marchiori
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello All,
> >>
> >>
> >> - My own build of trunk on Linux can open the file.
> >>
> >> Do you think that thi
On 6 Jan, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
>> On Jan 6, 2021, at 9:19 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>>
>> - My own build of trunk on Linux can open the file.
>>
>> Do you think that this is worth more investigation before releasing
>> 4.1.9?
>>
>
> AFAICT, it is not a regression
> On Jan 6, 2021, at 9:19 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
>
> - My own build of trunk on Linux can open the file.
>
> Do you think that this is worth more investigation before releasing
> 4.1.9?
>
AFAICT, it is not a regression (trunk and 4.1.x are very different)... So I
don
ow_bug.cgi?id=128413>
> >>> This was handled by making fakeroot required:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/4975252caf49bc46c383c6cef330cb927a635806
> >>
> >> OK, but did anyone confirm it with the test
office-users-fr/
- Mail original -
> De: "gilbert.sidobre"
> À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Envoyé: Vendredi 27 Novembre 2020 16:58:56
> Objet: BUG ?
>
> Bonjour,
> Je viens de télécharger votre version en français v 4.1.8.
> J'avais auparavan
Bonjour,
Je viens de télécharger votre version en français v 4.1.8.
J'avais auparavant installé une version à moitié en espagnol.
Lors de l'installation de la 4.1.8 français j'obtiens un message"cette version
est déjà installée".
J'ai fait une desinstallation avec iobit uninstaller.Recherche
dan
pages. :)
I wanted to ask about a possible bug or submitting a patch to this document. I
think I may have found an error in the size table in section 3.4.7.
Specifically, tFunc and tFuncVar on page 43. The BIFF8 size is listed at 4 and
5 respectively. However, in section 3.7.1 and 3.7.2 only 3
@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Fw: Regarding Bug in Calc when formatting graphs
When pasting sine graph into writer then the graph is incorrect as "Star Object
Descriptor (XML)" but looks great as an GDI METAFILE object, perhaps should be
default?
Cheers and happy ladies day.
A2 - Sin Waves Untitl
When pasting sine graph into writer then the graph is incorrect as "Star Object
Descriptor (XML)" but looks great as an GDI METAFILE object, perhaps should be
default?
Cheers and happy ladies day.
A2 - Sin Waves Untitled 7 2.ods
Description: A2 - Sin Waves Untitled 7 2.ods
---
Trying to complete graphs of sine waves. Due to the changing of the x scale,
when formatting the x axis, wavelength scale is set to 1 second.
This occurs whenever entering the graph format dialogue, where the "Major
Interval" is set to one, graph then shows no useful visual information.
See att
Am 09.08.19 um 21:56 schrieb ralfhelle...@mail.ru:
in writer I can input a pdf such as picture. Thats works good. Also I
can print it. Ists o.k.but if i make an exchange with pdf the inludet
pdf picrure disappeared.
I use Version: 6.1.2.1 (x64)
you are wrong here. As you are using another of
Hello,
in writer I can input a pdf such as picture. Thats works good. Also I
can print it. Ists o.k.but if i make an exchange with pdf the inludet
pdf picrure disappeared.
I use Version: 6.1.2.1 (x64)
Best wishes
Ralf Hellener
-
I was unable to search for a bug I reported on theforums after attempts made to
yourtwitter accountand to your forums, the issue revolving around documentation
and the types of export files that LibreOffice Math allows since as you are
aware a lot of other office packages offering different
Peter has granted Don Lewis 's request
for 4.1.6_release_blocker:
Issue 127874: fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using Microsoft
Uniscribe text layout API
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127874
--- Comment #1 from Peter ---
Accepted for
Don Lewis has asked for 4.1.6_release_blocker:
Issue 127874: fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using Microsoft
Uniscribe text layout API
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127874
--- Description ---
This trunk commit should be merged to AOO416 to fix the potential use of an
quot;
>> Both files saved and reopened.
>>
>> Larry
>>
>> On 2018-02-13, 4:56 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote concerning "Bug on macOS X and
>> Microsoft Word 2003 XML format":
>>> A bug has been reported on the Italian mailing list but I'd li
xml)"
> Both files saved and reopened.
>
> Larry
>
> On 2018-02-13, 4:56 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote concerning "Bug on macOS X and
> Microsoft Word 2003 XML format":
>> A bug has been reported on the Italian mailing list but I'd like to get
>> ver
Tested using OpenOffice 4.1.5 & macOS 10.13.3 High Sierra
Saved an existing .odt & a .doc file as "Microsoft Word 2003 XML (.xml)"
Both files saved and reopened.
Larry
On 2018-02-13, 4:56 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote concerning "Bug on macOS X and Microsoft Word 2003
XML
A bug has been reported on the Italian mailing list but I'd like to get
verification by a Mac user.
To reproduce:
1. Be on High Sierra (but it would be useful to check with other
versions too; the reporter says everything worked correctly, with
OpenOffice 4.1.5, before upgrading to
Thank you, I will try writing to them.
On 02/02/2018 02:50 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Juan Florez wrote:
I'm writing to report a problem that surfaced after trying to
download a relatively big number of bug reports from this project's
bugzilla. In short, any domain at apache.o
It's possible there might be some connection with that bug, but opening
Thierry's file in a hex editor indicates that it does have some xls content.
I would recommend Thierry post a bug report https://bz.apache.org/ooo/
and attach a copy of the file to that report.
Google translate tra
May this be affiliated with our Bug?
Google translate transcription into english:
Hello
to my regret I will uninstall Open Office 4.1.5:
for the 2nd time the .xls files updated with openoffice are saved ...
without the data.
only the empty sheet remains in the file
example attached
Bonjour
à mon grand regret je vais désinstaller Open Office 4.1.5 :
pour la 2eme fois les fchiers .xls mis à jour avec openoffice sont
enregistrés... sans les données.
il ne reste dans le fichier qu'une feuille vide,
exemple ci-joint.
C'est un bug bloquant
--
Très cordialement
Thie
Juan Florez wrote:
I'm writing to report a problem that surfaced after trying to download a
relatively big number of bug reports from this project's bugzilla. In
short, any domain at apache.org started rejecting connections
You have likely been blacklisted. You need to contact ASF
Hello, my name is Juan Florez and I am a PhD student at the University
of Texas at Dallas.
I'm writing to report a problem that surfaced after trying to download a
relatively big number of bug reports from this project's bugzilla. In
short, any domain at apache.org started
Jim Jagielski has granted Keith N. McKenna 's
request for 4.1.5_release_blocker:
Issue 127580: Fix for Issue 127568 created a new bug in Base
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127580
--- Comment #13 from Jim Jagielski ---
Keeping open to ensure that these are tested and fixed i
Keith N. McKenna has asked for 4.1.5_release_blocker:
Issue 127580: Fix for Issue 127568 created a new bug in Base
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127580
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
tion
>> level change for framework/source/loadenv/loadenv.cxx.
>
> I cannot reproduce it with the as-released 4.1.4 on Windows.
>
> Does anyone have a debug set-up that does reproduce it? If so, I can
> write instructions for testing whether it is related to the null point
the as-released 4.1.4 on Windows.
Does anyone have a debug set-up that does reproduce it? If so, I can
write instructions for testing whether it is related to the null pointer
bug.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
htt
On 26 Nov, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>
>
> On 11/26/2017 4:47 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 27 Nov, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>>> I can't reproduce it here, on trunk with:
>>> FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 20140512
>>> Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.3
>>> with either
Do we need/want a FreeBSD build VM? I could try to
set one up...
> On Nov 26, 2017, at 6:47 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> I'm seeing another bug in base on all versions of FreeBSD. To
> reproduce:
> 1. Open an existing database
> 2. Select Table in the far left pane
>
On 26 Nov, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>
>
> On 11/26/2017 4:47 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 27 Nov, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>>> I can't reproduce it here, on trunk with:
>>> FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 20140512
>>> Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.3
>>> with either
On 11/26/2017 4:47 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Nov, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
I can't reproduce it here, on trunk with:
FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 20140512
Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.3
with either our built-in HSQLDB driver or SQlite over ODBC.
What ver
On 27 Nov, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> I can't reproduce it here, on trunk with:
> FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 20140512
> Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.3
> with either our built-in HSQLDB driver or SQlite over ODBC.
>
> What version of AOO are you using? What d
amjan
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
> I'm seeing another bug in base on all versions of FreeBSD. To
> reproduce:
> 1. Open an existing database
> 2. Select Table in the far left pane
> 3. Select a table in the lower left pane
> 4. Select Document
I'm seeing another bug in base on all versions of FreeBSD. To
reproduce:
1. Open an existing database
2. Select Table in the far left pane
3. Select a table in the lower left pane
4. Select Document in the lower right pane
At that point, my mouse cursor shows that something is busy.
Hello!
For several years I using OOffice.
But I forced to old version OOffice, because in new version is bug with mooving
images.
So, when I move image at page by mouse and then double click on it, If in next
dialog, I click OK, the image move at page randomly
It you can see in video
https
Here is an example spreadsheet showing off the bug. After experimenting a bit
today I can conclude there doesn't seem to be a single function that can
capture the error from Find() when used in an array like this.
Using the function wizard and moving the cursor through the formula on the
ible Formula Bug in Calc? (IsError and Find)
I have an array formula that is returning an error of #VALUE when it
shouldn't.The formula is below.
{=ISERROR(INDEX($'Sales
4-10-2017'.$A$1:$A$1000;SMALL(IF(ISERROR(FIND("Discount";$'Sales
4-10-2017'.$A$1:$A$1000))=
he expected results of true or false. But on the actual
spreadsheet you get that #VALUE error.
Oh, I just tried switching out Find for Search and the same thing occurs. So
maybe it's a bug in iserror as it's the only constant?
--
s strange is if you move the cursor through the formula in the function
wizard it gets the expected results of true or false. But on the actual
spreadsheet you get that #VALUE error.
Oh, I just tried switching out Find for Search and the same thing occurs. So
maybe it's a bug in iserror as it's the only constant?
Am 10/25/2016 03:46 AM, schrieb bugzi...@apache.org:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=117338
Keith N. McKenna changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Hutchings [mailto:b...@decadent.org.uk]
> Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2016 18:11
> To: Jose R R ; 837...@bugs.debian.org; Wolfgang
> Tichy
> Cc: dev
> Subject: Re: Bug#837178: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: All memory and swap
>
On Sat, 2016-09-10 at 17:37 -0700, Jose R R wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Wolfgang Tichy
> wrote:
> >
> > Package: src:linux
> > Version: 3.16.7-ckt25-2+deb8u3
> > Severity: critical
> > Tags: security
> > Justification: causes serious data loss
> >
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
> > when
1 - 100 of 981 matches
Mail list logo