Hi,
first of all: what in hell is CPA???
after short review, I would say, this stuff should go into smsc_http.c. In
addition some parts are not done (e.g. smsc_shutdown , this function is
responsible for freeing all used memory by the smsc module , that means here
is the memory leak!)...
Have
onsdag 14. januar 2004, 11:12, skrev Alexander Malysh:
> I dag 11:12:45
>
> Hi,
>
> first of all: what in hell is CPA???
CPA = Content Provider Access. It is a fancy name for Billing ;-)
> after short review, I would say, this stuff should go into smsc_http.c. In
> addition some parts are not don
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 11:32, Arne K. Haaje wrote:
> onsdag 14. januar 2004, 11:12, skrev Alexander Malysh:
> > I dag 11:12:45
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > first of all: what in hell is CPA???
>
> CPA = Content Provider Access. It is a fancy name for Billing ;-)
ahh, ok... thanks ;)
>
> > after shor
Hi,
> first of all: what in hell is CPA???
I think if you guys have heard of CPA, I wouldn't need to write one! :-)
CPA is another protocol that is used by one of the local telcos over
here, the reference website is at
http://cpa.digi.com.my/
http://cpa.digi.com.my/Forum.jsp (this have some pdfs
Hi,
This is non kannel related.
How do I just reply to the list? Coz when I click on the "Reply"
buttton, I will just reply to the sender of the post. If I click on
"Reply all", I will need to delete the sender's name from the "To:"
list, is there a easy way to just reply to the list?
I am us
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 11:48, Phuah Yee Keat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is non kannel related.
>
> How do I just reply to the list? Coz when I click on the "Reply"
> buttton, I will just reply to the sender of the post. If I click on
> "Reply all", I will need to delete the sender's name from the
Not for me! :(
I always receive duplicates when you guys "reply all".
Alexander Malysh wrote:
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 11:48, Phuah Yee Keat wrote:
Hi,
This is non kannel related.
How do I just reply to the list? Coz when I click on the "Reply"
buttton, I will just reply to the sender of
if kannel list moderator can set ReplyTo: tag to [EMAIL PROTECTED] then
good to know that many people have started using Thunderbird.
is it still that heavy?
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Behalf Of Phuah Yee Keat
>Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004
Yeah, the best is for the ReplyTo: tab to be set to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
but I know one reason against that is that some posters might not be
subscribed to the list. Not sure about what's the case here though.
Thunderbird is very light. Started using it, coz nobody starts to write
worms that targ
onsdag 14. januar 2004, 11:48, skrev Phuah Yee Keat:
> Hi,
>
> This is non kannel related.
>
> How do I just reply to the list? Coz when I click on the "Reply"
> buttton, I will just reply to the sender of the post. If I click on
> "Reply all", I will need to delete the sender's name from the "To:"
Is this the same as EMI/UCP? Can that module be used for an operator
(TeliaSonera Sweden) that say it use that protocol?
--
Med vennlig hilsen,
Eurobate ASA
Arne K. Haaje
Senior Network Engineer
Eurobate ASA - Postboks 458
"Arne K. Haaje" schrieb:
>
> Is this the same as EMI/UCP? Can that module be used for an operator
> (TeliaSonera Sweden) that say it use that protocol?
yes, this is one "operation mode" of EMI/UCP.
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
as no objections were there, commited to cvs.
On Monday 12 January 2004 15:08, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> attached you can find patch that adds 2 new options for smsc_at:
> max-error-count and reset-string. For description of those see userguide
> changes inside of the patch.
> This pat
Somebody had a problem recently about sending MMS notifications
to the SE T610.
I've just found an item on the SE developer site that says WAP pushes
(ie. MMS notifications) are limited to 120 bytes for this and other
SE devices. I've tested it and its true :-(.
See http://www.sonyericsson.com/d
onsdag 14. januar 2004, 13:11, skrev Stipe Tolj:
> "Arne K. Haaje" schrieb:
> > Is this the same as EMI/UCP? Can that module be used for an operator
> > (TeliaSonera Sweden) that say it use that protocol?
>
> yes, this is one "operation mode" of EMI/UCP.
>
> Stipe
>
TeliaSonera use UCP 50 over HTT
Paul Keogh wrote:
>
> Somebody had a problem recently about sending MMS notifications
> to the SE T610.
>
> I've just found an item on the SE developer site that says WAP pushes
> (ie. MMS notifications) are limited to 120 bytes for this and other
> SE devices. I've tested it and its true :-(.
h
"Arne K. Haaje" wrote:
>
> onsdag 14. januar 2004, 13:11, skrev Stipe Tolj:
> > "Arne K. Haaje" schrieb:
> > > Is this the same as EMI/UCP? Can that module be used for an operator
> > > (TeliaSonera Sweden) that say it use that protocol?
> >
> > yes, this is one "operation mode" of EMI/UCP.
> >
>
onsdag 14. januar 2004, 20:31, skrev Stipe Tolj:
> "Arne K. Haaje" wrote:
> > onsdag 14. januar 2004, 13:11, skrev Stipe Tolj:
> > > "Arne K. Haaje" schrieb:
> > > > Is this the same as EMI/UCP? Can that module be used for an operator
> > > > (TeliaSonera Sweden) that say it use that protocol?
> >
"Arne K. Haaje" wrote:
>
>
> Yes, I know - but that is what they are using.. To send an SMS you craft a
> packet then send it over HTTPS.
>
> I am okay with the encryption for the transport, but why use HTTP (S). Why not
> just connect to a SMSC that speak the protocol natively? There is also th
onsdag 14. januar 2004, 22:02, skrev Stipe Tolj:
> "Arne K. Haaje" wrote:
> > Yes, I know - but that is what they are using.. To send an SMS you craft
> > a packet then send it over HTTPS.
> >
> > I am okay with the encryption for the transport, but why use HTTP (S).
> > Why not just connect to a S
> >
> > which means you have to pass the UCP string via HTTP GET/POST over
> > HTTPS to them? ... what kind of perversion is this?!
> >
> > I guess they use HTTPS for getting the security purpose "done"?! Seems
> > they never heard of stunnel (for SSL-enabling TCP server-client
> > applications) or
Paul Keogh wrote:
>
> > >
> > > which means you have to pass the UCP string via HTTP GET/POST over
> > > HTTPS to them? ... what kind of perversion is this?!
> > >
> > > I guess they use HTTPS for getting the security purpose "done"?! Seems
> > > they never heard of stunnel (for SSL-enabling TCP s
I want to add to kannel new protocol about china unicom SGIP.
I learn SMPP protocol code.
I want to get some help,How to add new protocol surportted for kannel.
where do I get document from?
==
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
马上到http://www.126.com申请25M免
Hi Stipe and all…
Is upgrading Kannel WAP from WAP 1.2 to 2.0 in progress? Or any
plan of when it can be released? If the plan has not started, when is it going
to start?
Please let me know the status coz I wish to take part if I could.
James
24 matches
Mail list logo
