I have tried this too with no apparent change.
I have installed (clean install, no upgrade)
Fedora and I still get the very same behaviour.
Is there a reference Linux distribution that
you guys use when developing or do you all
use a custom compiled kernel? If the latter,
what should I try to actu
Short answer:
same thing, still superslow.
Long answer:
That is indeed what I tried... after re-reading my initial post I
realised I didn't specify which X terminal was I using.
The numbers are pretty much the same regardless of the terminal I use
although the system seems slightly more responsi
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Salvio wrote:
> I have attached the latest config file and log.
> I was incorrect in stating #1: I was testing the system disabling
> acceleration (option "accel" "no") to see if I could notice any
> difference.
> The attached log is the one corresponding to the attached con
do you have any thoughs?
Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Salvio wrote:
I have attached the latest config file and log.
I see no attachments here.
Marc.
+--+---+
| Marc Aurele La France | work:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Salvio wrote:
> >On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Salvio wrote:
> >
> >>I have attached the latest config file and log.
What happens if you disable 3D acceleration by commenting out
Load "DRI"
in the "Module" section ?
Section "Module"
Load "dbe"
Load "extmod"
ouch!
Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Salvio wrote:
I have attached the latest config file and log.
I see no attachments here.
Marc.
+--+---+
| Marc Aurele La France | work: 1-780-492-9310
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Salvio wrote:
> I have attached the latest config file and log.
I see no attachments here.
Marc.
+--+---+
| Marc Aurele La France | work: 1-780-492-9310 |
| Computing and Network Servic
Hi Marc,
thanks for your help.
I have attached the latest config file and log.
I was incorrect in stating #1: I was testing the system disabling
acceleration (option "accel" "no") to see if I could notice any
difference.
The attached log is the one corresponding to the attached config.
The vide
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Salvio wrote:
> Things I noticed:
> 1 - in XFree86.0.log the:
> (WW) ATI(0): Cannot shadow an accelerated frame buffer.
> has been replaced by
> (II) ATI(0): Using shadow frame buffer.
This would indicate that acceleration has been somehow turned off.
Enabling backing store
Actually the window in which I run top only refreshes when
the CPU is not maxed out. I'm trying to find a way of logging
to a file the CPU activity but it all seems to me that the X
process if eating all the CPU cycles.
Salvio wrote:
before changing anything, when moving windows, top shows:
70-75
before changing anything, when moving windows, top shows:
70-75% to X
about 10% to metacity
about 10% to gnome-terminal
when idle, top shows:
<2% to X
<2% to gnome-terminal
<1% to other applications
after changing:
<>
top shows:
about 50-60% to X
about 10% to metacity
about 10% to gnome-termina
OK - thanks
I'll have to try that on Friday (I won't be home before...) and will
post the results.
- Salvio
Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Salvio wrote:
If `top` shows that the server is not entirely to blame for the CPU load,
see if turning on backing store has any effe
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Salvio wrote:
> >>If `top` shows that the server is not entirely to blame for the CPU load,
> >>see if turning on backing store has any effect.
> CPU is idle - CPU is maxed out when moving windows
> swap memory is not used
> less than 50% of available phisical memory is used
Marc,
If `top` shows that the server is not entirely to blame for the CPU load,
see if turning on backing store has any effect.
CPU is idle - CPU is maxed out when moving windows
swap memory is not used
less than 50% of available phisical memory is used
(both when moving and when not moving window
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Salvio wrote:
> >>>Everything starts fine with no errors (as you can see from the logs).
> >>>The problem I have is that I don't think I have 2D acceleration.
> >>>The simple test I do is to just drag a window on the screen... the
> >>>redraw is extremely slow and the CPU is
As I said, the CPU is normally idle. When I quickly drag windows on the
screen using my mouse, the CPU gets maxed out.
I cannot believe that the redraw speed is that slow regardless of themes
and such: I can see the windows being actually redrawn on screen when
I drag them around the screen.
FYI: I
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Salvio Sergi wrote:
> > Everything starts fine with no errors (as you can see from the logs).
> > The problem I have is that I don't think I have 2D acceleration.
> > The simple test I do is to just drag a window on the scre
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Salvio Sergi wrote:
> Everything starts fine with no errors (as you can see from the logs).
> The problem I have is that I don't think I have 2D acceleration.
> The simple test I do is to just drag a window on the screen... the
> redraw is extremely slow and the CPU is maxed
try removing the videoram line from your config. the driver will
detect videoram fine.
Alex
--- Salvio Sergi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I posted this on dri-users and have been suggested to post here...
>
> Everything starts fine with no errors (as you can see from the logs).
>
> Th
Hi,
I posted this on dri-users and have been suggested to post here...
Everything starts fine with no errors (as you can see from the logs).
The problem I have is that I don't think I have 2D acceleration.
The simple test I do is to just drag a window on the screen... the
redraw is extremely sl
20 matches
Mail list logo
