gt; on
behalf of Matthew Woehlke <mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 6:20:20 PM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Decrease amounth of delivered src packages
On 2017-02-15 18:11, Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
> The actual value of gzip and the reas
On miércoles, 15 de febrero de 2017 17:29:43 ART Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017 15:11:49 PST Mathias Hasselmann
>
> wrote:
> > That's a somewhat limited point of view. Yes, xz archives are slightly
> > smaller, but to be honest: In the days of 4K video streaming
On quinta-feira, 16 de fevereiro de 2017 07:06:51 PST Kevin Kofler wrote:
> It was found that in practice, requesting the same tag from GitHub multiple
> times gives byte-identical tar.gz output. (Unfortunately, GitHub cannot
> deliver better compressions.) Of course this might break if they
Thiago Macieira wrote:
> You can compare the checksum of the uncompressed tarball.
But this is not how the Fedora workflow works. And please also note that I
did not make the policies, I am just trying to explain why they are the way
they are. And I suspect that there are several other
On quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017 15:11:49 PST Mathias Hasselmann
wrote:
> That's a somewhat limited point of view. Yes, xz archives are slightly
> smaller, but to be honest: In the days of 4K video streaming saving
> 100MiB of download size doesn't seem as important as it was.
There are
On quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017 16:14:30 PST Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
> > If distros care about size they can re-compress.
> > Well, and to my experience they do.
>
> I cannot speak for other distributions, but it is Fedora policy to never
> modify an upstream
Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
> If distros care about size they can re-compress.
> Well, and to my experience they do.
I cannot speak for other distributions, but it is Fedora policy to never
modify an upstream tarball unless it is required to remove files that cannot
be legally redistributed for
Am 15.02.2017 um 18:08 schrieb Konstantin Tokarev:
15.02.2017, 20:07, "Thiago Macieira" :
On quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017 09:04:12 PST Konstantin Podsvirov
wrote:
This can be not quite on this topic, but I have a suggestion and MVP
implementation for
Am 15.02.2017 um 13:05 schrieb Dmitry Shachnev:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:28:11PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
I would kindly request you to at least use tar.xz (rather than tar.gz) for
the tarballs. (What you use as the Windows format is something you need to
sort out with the Windows
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 08:54:40AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017, às 15:05:06 PST, Dmitry Shachnev
> escreveu:
> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:28:11PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > I would kindly request you to at least use tar.xz (rather than tar.gz)
15.02.2017, 20:10, "Alexandru Croitor" :
> I think it's minimal viable product.
Yes! It'w work for me now. You can try QtIFW (with --repository option) from my
experimental installer for Windows:
I think it's minimal viable product.
> On 15 Feb 2017, at 18:08, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>
>
>
> 15.02.2017, 20:07, "Thiago Macieira" :
>> On quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017 09:04:12 PST Konstantin Podsvirov
>> wrote:
>>> This can be not
15.02.2017, 20:07, "Thiago Macieira" :
> On quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017 09:04:12 PST Konstantin Podsvirov
> wrote:
>> This can be not quite on this topic, but I have a suggestion and MVP
>> implementation for QtIFW.
>>
>> This may affect the development
On quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017 09:04:12 PST Konstantin Podsvirov
wrote:
> This can be not quite on this topic, but I have a suggestion and MVP
> implementation for QtIFW.
>
>
> This may affect the development process, testing and create offline
> installers.
Most Valuable Player?
--
Hello all!This can be not quite on this topic, but I have a suggestion and MVP implementation for QtIFW.This may affect the development process, testing and create offline installers.19:55, 15 February 2017 г., Thiago Macieira :Em quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017,
Em quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017, às 15:05:06 PST, Dmitry Shachnev
escreveu:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:28:11PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > I would kindly request you to at least use tar.xz (rather than tar.gz) for
> > the tarballs. (What you use as the Windows format is something
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:28:11PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I would kindly request you to at least use tar.xz (rather than tar.gz) for
> the tarballs. (What you use as the Windows format is something you need to
> sort out with the Windows people.) The fact that tar.gz is still the most
>
Jani Heikkinen wrote:
> well, of course this would be possible as well but this would be a change
> to existing "behavior" : Currently 7z is with unix line endings. And as
> you can see from statistic tar.gz and .zip are most used ones and so on it
> would be quite reasonable to continue offering
.@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Decrease amounth of delivered src packages
15.02.2017, 13:39, "Jani Heikkinen" <jani.heikki...@qt.io>:
> Hi all,
>
> As you know we need to optimize our systems to be able to keep our plans in
> the future. In CI side we ar
15.02.2017, 13:39, "Jani Heikkinen" :
> Hi all,
>
> As you know we need to optimize our systems to be able to keep our plans in
> the future. In CI side we are handling at least 4 different branches at same
> time. Releasing side we should be able to do many
Hi all,
As you know we need to optimize our systems to be able to keep our plans in the
future. In CI side we are handling at least 4 different branches at same time.
Releasing side we should be able to do many releases/snapshots parallel, test
those releases/snapshots parallel etc. And all
21 matches
Mail list logo