* Florent Daigni?re [2008-05-18 06:09:15]:
> * Matthew Toseland [2008-05-17 14:44:27]:
>
> > On Saturday 17 May 2008 13:58, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > > * Florent Daigni?re [2008-05-17
> > > 14:03:10]:
> > >
> > > > * Matthew Toseland [2008-05-17 12:29:09]:
> > > >
> > > > > As nextgens
* Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-18 06:09:15]:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 14:44:27]:
On Saturday 17 May 2008 13:58, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 14:03:10]:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Ian Clarke [2008-05-17 10:35:59]:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
> > As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might
> > want
> > to review this before I apply it.
>
> You know, I wish you guys would at least try using that Smartbear
>
* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 10:35:59]:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might
want
to review this before I apply it.
You know, I wish you guys would at least try
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 5:34 AM, Daniel Cheng
> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Ian Clarke wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland
>>> wrote:
As nextgens is worried about
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
>> As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might want
>> to review this before I apply it.
>
> You know, I wish you guys would at least try using that
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 5:34 AM, Daniel Cheng
wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Ian Clarke wrote:
>> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland
>> wrote:
>>> As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might
>>> want
>>> to
* Matthew Toseland [2008-05-17 14:44:27]:
> On Saturday 17 May 2008 13:58, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * Florent Daigni?re [2008-05-17 14:03:10]:
> >
> > > * Matthew Toseland [2008-05-17 12:29:09]:
> > >
> > > > As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he
> > > >
* Ian Clarke [2008-05-17 20:43:17]:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
> > On Saturday 17 May 2008 16:35, Ian Clarke wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland
> >> wrote:
> >> > As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might want
to review this before I apply it.
You know, I wish you guys would at
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 5:34 AM, Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 5:34 AM, Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Saturday 17 May 2008 16:35, Ian Clarke wrote:
>> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland
>> wrote:
>> > As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might
> want
>> > to review this before I apply it.
On Saturday 17 May 2008 16:35, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
> > As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might
want
> > to review this before I apply it.
>
> You know, I wish you guys would at least try using that
* Florent Daigni?re [2008-05-17 14:03:10]:
> * Matthew Toseland [2008-05-17 12:29:09]:
>
> > As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might
> > want
> > to review this before I apply it.
> >
>
> There is a related bug in the bug tracker... It's not the only bits
On Saturday 17 May 2008 13:58, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> * Florent Daigni?re [2008-05-17 14:03:10]:
>
> > * Matthew Toseland [2008-05-17 12:29:09]:
> >
> > > As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might
want
> > > to review this before I apply it.
> > >
> >
> >
* Matthew Toseland [2008-05-17 12:29:09]:
> As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might want
> to review this before I apply it.
>
There is a related bug in the bug tracker... It's not the only bits that
need updating :/
See #74
> CPUID patch
> From:
> yongjhen
As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might want
to review this before I apply it.
CPUID patch
From:
yongjhen at okYcFnYIaKTYWj1K7EfA7LONeLu7Bwazdd4djTIe4eU
Date:
Friday 16 May 2008 03:43:30
Groups:
freenet
Followup-To:
freenet
Message was signed with unknown
As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might want
to review this before I apply it.
CPUID patch
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Friday 16 May 2008 03:43:30
Groups:
freenet
Followup-To:
freenet
Message was signed with unknown key 0xB3FFA5B9.
The validity of the
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 12:29:09]:
As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might want
to review this before I apply it.
There is a related bug in the bug tracker... It's not the only bits that
need updating :/
See #74
CPUID patch
From:
* Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 14:03:10]:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 12:29:09]:
As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might
want
to review this before I apply it.
There is a related bug in the bug tracker...
On Saturday 17 May 2008 13:58, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 14:03:10]:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 12:29:09]:
As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might
want
to review this before I
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might want
to review this before I apply it.
You know, I wish you guys would at least try using that Smartbear
software, this is *exactly* what it is
On Saturday 17 May 2008 16:35, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might
want
to review this before I apply it.
You know, I wish you guys would at least try using
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 17 May 2008 16:35, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might
want
to review
* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 20:43:17]:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 17 May 2008 16:35, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As nextgens is worried about
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 14:44:27]:
On Saturday 17 May 2008 13:58, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 14:03:10]:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 12:29:09]:
As nextgens is worried about anonymous
27 matches
Mail list logo