On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 03:46:35 UTC, codephantom wrote:
It's D I'm interested in. Not VS.
btw. since this thread has gone way off topic... I'd suggest this
one instead:
https://forum.dlang.org/thread/xwuxfcdaqkcealxzg...@forum.dlang.org
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 02:09:31 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
It seems to me that you have a major case of anti-windows bias
here, as I never have any issues on my main windows machine.
Actually, it's the very opposite...I'm strongly arguing 'for' D
on Windows.
(otherwise I wouldn't have wa
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 07:39:21 UTC, codephantom wrote:
It's the *minimum* 'selection set' you'll need (with regards to
the Visual Studio Build Tools 2017) in order to get DMD to
sucessfully compile a 64bit exe (-m64)
Now to be fair, this is assuming you **don't** want and
**don't**
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 02:09:31 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
It seems to me that you have a major case of anti-windows bias
here, as I never have any issues on my main windows machine.
Well, throughout this discussion, I have documented *my*
experience (not yours) of getting 64bit D on a f
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 01:43:46 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 01:07:17 UTC, Jerry wrote:
So why do you care about something that doesn't even affect
you?
Well, if you had been following the discussion, instead of just
trying to troll, then you would know tha
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 01:43:46 UTC, codephantom wrote:
So I'm executing my right to free speech, and I'm saying that I
don't like it, and I wish it was better. Is that so bad?
You are doing more than saying you don't like it. You are
requesting and advocating for the removal of a featu
On 10/28/17 12:46, Jerry wrote:
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 15:36:38 UTC, codephantom wrote:
But if you really are missing my point..then let me state it more
clearly...
(1) I don't like waiting 4 hours to download gigabytes of crap I don't
actually want, but somehow need (if I want to comp
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 01:07:17 UTC, Jerry wrote:
So why do you care about something that doesn't even affect you?
Well, if you had been following the discussion, instead of just
trying to troll, then you would know that I was essentially doing
an experiment.
AIM: If I was using Wi
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 00:45:08 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 19:46:00 UTC, Jerry wrote:
Start the download when you go to sleep, when you wake up it
will be finished. I did this as a kid when I had internet that
was probably even slower than yours right now. It
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 00:17:10 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 19:46:00 UTC, Jerry wrote:
It's probably why you shouldn't be on Windows to begin with..
I'm not. I'm on FreeBSD.
So why do you care about something that doesn't even affect you?
Talk about being
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 19:46:00 UTC, Jerry wrote:
Start the download when you go to sleep, when you wake up it
will be finished. I did this as a kid when I had internet that
was probably even slower than yours right now. It'll be like
those 4 hours never even happened.
That's grea
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 19:46:00 UTC, Jerry wrote:
It's probably why you shouldn't be on Windows to begin with..
I'm not. I'm on FreeBSD.
Talk about being narcissistic ;)
I wasn't talking about narcissism, I was talking about trolling.
Narcissism was not correlated with trolling en
On Saturday, October 28, 2017 16:59:03 LunaticWare via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Event if there is no default constructor on struct we can still
> make one that work as well as if it were implemented, here is my
> example n__n
This idiom gets suggested from time to time, and I'm sure that it gets use
On Saturday, October 28, 2017 21:51:50 Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 25 October 2017 at 22:19:21 UTC, Walter Bright
>
> wrote:
> > for core D devs. Of course, this is much easier in D than in
> > C++ because of D's const and pure attributes.
>
> Nah, the type system
On Saturday, October 28, 2017 19:06:29 Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 18:58:50 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
>
> wrote:
> > I am using wine to build our Windows toolchain on Linux per
> > https://wiki.dlang.org/Building_under_Posix. After building
> > dmd, I
On Friday, 27 October 2017 at 19:03:01 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, October 27, 2017 12:30:58 bauss via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Are there any plans to completely remove the delete keyword so
members of ex. a class can be called delete? Or is there still
code within DMD or Phobos that us
On Wednesday, 25 October 2017 at 22:19:21 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
for core D devs. Of course, this is much easier in D than in
C++ because of D's const and pure attributes.
Nah, the type system isn't critical for doing functional style
programming. People who want to do functional programmin
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 15:36:38 UTC, codephantom wrote:
But if you really are missing my point..then let me state it
more clearly...
(1) I don't like waiting 4 hours to download gigabytes of crap
I don't actually want, but somehow need (if I want to compile
64bit D that is).
Start
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 14:43:38 UTC, codephantom wrote:
I explicitly mentioned that I did ***NOT*** want VS
installed.
So? If you don't want to use it, then don't use D, or don't use
Windows. There's simple solution to your problem. Rust requires
VS, you can't build on Window
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 18:58:50 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I am using wine to build our Windows toolchain on Linux per
https://wiki.dlang.org/Building_under_Posix. After building
dmd, I tried to unittest druntime:
wine make -f win32.mak
and got this:
core.exception.AssertError@
I am using wine to build our Windows toolchain on Linux per
https://wiki.dlang.org/Building_under_Posix. After building dmd, I tried
to unittest druntime:
wine make -f win32.mak
and got this:
core.exception.AssertError@src\core\sync\mutex.d(380): unittest failure
Is this reproducible? Does a
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 14:55:25 UTC, aberba wrote:
On Sunday, 22 October 2017 at 02:48:57 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I just read the following two week-old comment on the ldc
issue tracker, when someone tried to run D on Alpine linux:
"For now everything works(?) but I think the process could
Wait? You are saying D does not support this yet? Wow :D. I have been using
this so often in work (PHP) so I can beleive I have not miss this
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 2:39 PM, bauss via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 11:38:52 UTC, Andrei Alexa
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 16:23:13 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
The beauty of it is they work basically the same. Especially on
Windows, where 32 bit programs just work on almost any
installation, 32 or 64 bit.
yes. i have dmd on one of my old laptops (it runs XP 32bit)
...works just f
Event if there is no default constructor on struct we can still
make one that work as well as if it were implemented, here is my
example n__n
--
import std.format;
import std.stdio;
struct Player
{
string name = "Baz";
float[2] position = [0, 0];
// Adding an explicit constru
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 15:20:05 UTC, Mengu wrote:
my code that worked amazing on linux and mac os x failed
miserably on freebsd which is my server os whenever and
wherever possible. i did not have the luxury of days to fix
stuff so i simply switched to debian.
Would be interested to
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 16:03:15 UTC, codephantom wrote:
I like seeing how code works in different environments.
The beauty of it is they work basically the same. Especially on
Windows, where 32 bit programs just work on almost any
installation, 32 or 64 bit.
The DMar's C compiler i
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 15:42:00 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Why do you want 64 bit? I very rarely do 64 bit builds on
Windows (mostly just to make sure my crap actually works) since
there's not actually that many advantages to it anyway!
I'm more of an experimenter than a programmer.
I
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 15:36:38 UTC, codephantom wrote:
(if I want to compile 64bit D that is).
(being a recreational programmer
Why do you want 64 bit? I very rarely do 64 bit builds on Windows
(mostly just to make sure my crap actually works) since there's
not actually that many ad
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 15:18:07 UTC, Mengu wrote:
with mac os x, we have to download gbs of command line tools
library before getting started with any development. if we want
to build anything for ios or mac we have to download 5gb xcode.
with a fast internet, you get that in a matter
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 02:50:39 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 01:08:57 UTC, Mengu wrote:
looks like d has a long way to go on freebsd as well.
I've had no issues with D in FreeBSD at all...
...and it's been a really smooth transition to D...so far...
I have
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 14:43:38 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 14:00:14 UTC, Jerry wrote:
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 07:39:21 UTC, codephantom
wrote:
btw. (and I do realise we've gone way of the topic of this
original thread)...but...
if it interests any
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 14:50:25 UTC, codephantom wrote:
I think I meant troll, not trawl ;-)
btw...
A scientific research paper, titled 'Trolls just want to have
fun' found that:
- Sadism and Machiavellianism were unique predictors of trolling
enjoyment..
- Found clear evidence th
On Sunday, 22 October 2017 at 02:48:57 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I just read the following two week-old comment on the ldc issue
tracker, when someone tried to run D on Alpine linux:
"For now everything works(?) but I think the process could be
improved.. Would be really cool to have LDC easily build
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 14:43:38 UTC, codephantom wrote:
Nice one Jerry.
Go trawl somewhere else!
I think I meant troll, not trawl ;-)
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 14:00:14 UTC, Jerry wrote:
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 07:39:21 UTC, codephantom wrote:
btw. (and I do realise we've gone way of the topic of this
original thread)...but...
if it interests anyone, this is the outcome of yesterday,
where I wasted my whole da
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 07:39:21 UTC, codephantom wrote:
btw. (and I do realise we've gone way of the topic of this
original thread)...but...
if it interests anyone, this is the outcome of yesterday, where
I wasted my whole day trying to get DMD to compile a 64bit .exe
on a fresh inst
On Sunday, 22 October 2017 at 14:59:41 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 10/22/17 9:41 AM, User wrote:
Is there a list of such quirks or gotchas in dlang?
The ones I know of are
1. Implicit conversion from double to float
2. Integer division results in integer result truncation the
fraction
On Wednesday, 18 October 2017 at 23:02:27 UTC, Stephan Dilly
wrote:
On 2017-10-18 22:25:23 +, ikod said:
On Wednesday, 18 October 2017 at 20:51:48 UTC, Stephan Dilly
wrote:
On 2017-10-18 20:19:20 +, ikod said:
[...]
Are you going to take over the task?
--Stephan
I'd like, but I
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 00:05:53 UTC, codephantom wrote:
Is is it problem that D should accept, and just impose on it's
users?
Or should D find a better way?
Which is the worse mentality?
There is an afterlife with god.
There is nothingness after death.
Which is the worse mentality?
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 00:05:53 UTC, codephantom wrote:
Rubbish!
And get you facts straight!
Where did I advocate from the removal of the ability for D to
generate 64-bit binaries?
So you are saying to not use the platform's tools to generate
binaries. That's like saying not to the
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 09:20:40 UTC, MrSmith wrote:
error: test.obj: The file was not recognized as a valid object
file
Ah, forgot to pass -m64 to dmd
On 2017-10-28 08:11, Brad Roberts wrote:
The issues weren't compiling dmd but passing the full test suite. Both
are required.
Yes, I've run the test suite as well, DMD, druntime and Phobos.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 11:38:52 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Walter and I decided to kick-off project Elvis for adding the
homonym operator to D.
[...]
This is honestly going to be a great addition.
Walter and I decided to kick-off project Elvis for adding the homonym
operator to D.
Razvan Nitu has already done a good part of the work:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/7242
https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/pull/1917
https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/pull/1918
What's needed is a precise
On Friday, 27 October 2017 at 16:05:10 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
With this the only missing piece will be the C startup code
(mainCRTStartup in crtexe.c), though not sure where it's
compiled.
How do I get lld-link to link .obj files?
Clang itself emits .o files, and those link successfully.
For .obj
On Thursday, 26 October 2017 at 20:44:49 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
The XCode installer DMG is 5GB, before unpacking. And unlike
VS17, I can't pick and choose. :)
btw. (and I do realise we've gone way of the topic of this
original thread)...but...
if it interests anyone, this is the outcome of
On Saturday, October 28, 2017 07:12:13 Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Visual Studio 2017 has native support for cmake as project format.
>
> It is also the new official format for Android NDK development.
>
> So we are quite ok with using cmake. :)
That definitely sounds like an improvemen
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 03:00:16 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Saturday, October 28, 2017 02:48:00 evilrat via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 02:30:50 UTC, codephantom
wrote:
> On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 01:42:52 UTC, evilrat wrote:
>> Since you already on t
49 matches
Mail list logo
