I recently purchased a brand new SB Touch at a tidy profit for the
seller. It will arrive shortly. I did consider a used Transporter. I
think the Transporter has the higher cool factor, but the Touch will do
nicely and should sound excellent in my system. I already have a SB or
six, so the Tou
Just tested with my ethernet connected TOUCH. at 10,000 kbps it was
100%. Also tested with SqueezePlay running on my WIFI connected laptop.
Also 100% at 10,000 kbps. Not sure why my old style players show less
than 100% at > 500kbps. same network, same server, same router, even
swapped out so
I did some checkiong on the plugin.
It used to use UDP but was rewritten to support Touch and Radio and now
uses TCP.
In the plugin there is this line regarding max rate to test and this
line is used for any player except Radio, Touch and Squeezeplay.
Code:
re
garym wrote:
> makes sense (the 10/100 part for sure, as the boom and transporter
> aren't gigabit capable anyhow).
Yup, and shows consistency across basic networks in good health.
Whether these results can actually tell us much beyond that I have no
idea.
toby10 wrote:
> That's close to what I get with my Boom on WiFi and only 10/100 network.
> Mine are
> 500kbps and less - 100%
> 1000 kbps - about 78%
> 1500 kbps - about 72%
> 2000 kbps - about 44%
makes sense (the 10/100 part for sure, as the boom and transporter
aren't gigabit capable anyh
Was the same test site used for UE Radio beta?
toby10's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12553
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=100638
___
garym wrote:
> I ran the test on two players (a transporter and a boom). Both connected
> via eithernet to gigabit switch with Cat6.
> 500kbps and less - 100%
> 1000 kbps - about 75%
> 1500 kbps - about 49%
> 2000 kbps - about 40%
That's close to what I get with my Boom on WiFi and only 10/100
n
bpa wrote:
>
>
> Have you checked the network interface statistics on your LMS server ?
what is this? Where would I find this.
p.s. I was really surprised to see I wasn't at 100% at even 1000kbps
(see above). But the fact I can play 24/96 flac files at over 3000 kbps
seems to point to the f
garym wrote:
> isn't test.mysqueezebox.com an old site that was used before
> mysqueezebox.com went live? I suspect you're seeing out of date info
It's not an old site, but our staging server. We use it to test new
features, bug fixes etc.
The fact that you're seeing iHR is a glitch. We usu
garym wrote:
> I ran the test on two players (a transporter and a boom). Both connected
> via eithernet to gigabit switch with Cat6.
> 500kbps and less - 100%
> 1000 kbps - about 75%
> 1500 kbps - about 49%
> 2000 kbps - about 40%
>
>
Those numbers are more-or-less the same as I'm seeing. You
narten wrote:
> Network Test absolutely does not work in a way that makes sense. .
Don't forget the test is from LMS application straight trhough to Player
- that includes interfaces, cables, bridges, routers and SB3 player.
You could have a problem on your Sb3 interface, or the cable to the SB3
tandy1000rl wrote:
> Don't want to start any rumors, but navigate to
> http://test.mysqueezebox.com and cycle through the available apps under
> "Get more out of your Squeezebox". Also, go to App Gallery and there it
> is as well--an iHeartRadio app in all of its glory.
>
> Unfortunately, the t
narten wrote:
> It was using the wired when I tested. Believe me, I've spent hours
> looking at this and reconfiguring things. I've gotten way better at the
> configs that anyone should have to...
>
> But, its easy to test. How about running the networking test yourself?
> You just have to enabl
Is there an app for PCs (Windows, specifically) that allows you to
remotely connect using a URL-type address rather than just the numeric
IP address?
SqueezePlay requires the numeric IP address. From a remote location, I'd
rather be able to use a name that is a) easier to remember and b) fixed.
Don't want to start any rumors, but navigate to
http://test.mysqueezebox.com and cycle through the available apps under
"Get more out of your Squeezebox". Also, go to App Gallery and there it
is as well--an iHeartRadio app in all of its glory.
Unfortunately, the test site has Copyright 2012 at t
garym wrote:
> Good point. you can easily tell if it is still connected to WIFI (even
> though you think it is connected to ethernet cable). In LMS > Settings >
> Information Tab, scroll down and under players that are WIFI connected
> it shows WIFI signal strength. It doesn't show this for ether
jimbobvfr400 wrote:
> Just a thought but are you absolutely sure it was using the Ethernet
> connection. Unlike most devices just plugging in a cable won't work, you
> need to reset the SB and reselect the cable connection. Apologies if you
> already know this.
>
> Sent from my HUAWEI Y300-0100
mbarrien wrote:
> Does anyone have any feedback on what a 5 year old Transporter is worth
> today?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Michael
hard to say, but I'd guess $800 is too much. The internal DAC with
balanced outs, etc. can be bested these days with newer technology DAC
paired with a TOUCH. On the othe
Just a thought but are you absolutely sure it was using the Ethernet
connection. Unlike most devices just plugging in a cable won't work, you
need to reset the SB and reselect the cable connection. Apologies if you
already know this.
Sent from my HUAWEI Y300-0100 using Tapatalk
--
Does anyone have any feedback on what a 5 year old Transporter is worth
today?
Thanks!
Michael
mbarrien's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=62238
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/show
It's just my opinion but previously I always wanted a transporter but in
all honesty I'd go for a Touch in preference to the transporter. Mainly
for the reasons given above and also for possible future upgrades with a
DAC and the EDO plugin.
Sent from my HUAWEI Y300-0100 using Tapatalk
--
Yesfan70 wrote:
> I have a 3 Squeeze boxes (two v3 and one original), but have thought
> about adding a "higher end" player to my home theater room. I've always
> wanted the Transporter, but the Touch looks like a great player as well.
> Is there any advantages of one over the other?
>
>
> On a
I have a 3 Squeeze boxes (two v3 and one original), but have thought
about adding a "higher end" player to my home theater room. I've always
wanted the Transporter, but the Touch looks like a great player as well.
Is there any advantages of one over the other?
On another note, is there a chance
ralphy wrote:
> Shut down Squeezeplay and try deleting the userpath folder, mine is
> located at.
>
> C:\Documents and Settings\Ralphy\Application Data\SqueezePlay\userpath
>
> and start squeezeplay again.
Thanks for the reply. Tried it, but it didn't make any difference. Also
tried deleting
bpa wrote:
> IIRC the network test still works OK and it uses UDP to test the quality
> of the underlying network as packet loss can be detected easily. LMS
> will stream uses TCP to a player which means TCP will recover from loss
> of packets but this can cause problems if effective throughput
narten wrote:
> First, there is a "network test" plugin that supposedly allows you test
> the quality of the network connection between an SB and the LMS. It
> doesn't appear to work properly. It shows no packet loss for data rates
> under 1Mbps, but shows packet loss at 1Mbps and a very high los
Thanks for the suggestions. Things are working better for me now. Here
is what I've learned.
First, there is a "network test" plugin that supposedly allows you test
the quality of the network connection between an SB and the LMS. It
doesn't appear to work properly. It shows no packet loss for dat
Shut down Squeezeplay and try deleting the userpath folder, mine is
located at.
C:\Documents and Settings\Ralphy\Application Data\SqueezePlay\userpath
and start squeezeplay again.
Ralphy
*1*-Touch, *4*-Classics, *2*-Booms, *1*-Reverted UE Radio
*1*-Squeezeslave, *2*-Squeezeplays, *5*-Squeeze
Check for duplicate IP's and max number of devices allowed on WiFi?
Seems the two most logical reasons for such behavior.
I doubt it is a general issue with the PS4 itself.
toby10's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/m
A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the
results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53800
Question: S
A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the
results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53800
Question: S
The new Playstation 4 can very disappointing not be connected to the 5
GHz wireless network .
This means that it runs at 2.4 GHz network and interfere with
Squeezeboxes .
After my son started his PS4 my Squeezeboxes began to be thrown on and
off my wireless network all the time.
In my living room
32 matches
Mail list logo
