On 11/21/05, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Roger Markus wrote:
> > Do give yourself an overlap period to get used to Linux. Once you're up
> to
> > speed with it, you'll never want to touch a Lose-W machine again, but
> there
>
> > use the Lose-W box less and less, but don't attempt a "Bang!
Roger Markus wrote:
On 11/20/05, John Boyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To Discuss and Daniel Carrera: Your suggestions are being followed by me
as fast as I can. I need one KVM switch so I can use my monitor for both
Win and Linux, until I get my Linux under control, I mean knowledge
the end
On Sat November 19 2005 22:48, John Boyle wrote:
>
> To Discuss and Daniel Carrera: Your suggestions are being followed by me
> as fast as I can. I need one KVM switch so I can use my monitor for both
> Win and Linux, until I get my Linux under control, I mean knowledge
> control. I bought a 64 bit
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:36, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> Terri Sprague wrote:
> > Quite a few of us, even though we have internet satellite
> > connections, do not stay connected all the time. In my
> > opinion, that is a disaster waiting to happen because of
> > hackers, viruses, etc.
>
> Why not switch
Roger Markus wrote:
but don't attempt a "Bang!" one day swtich-over, it's not realistic.
I did it :-)
I had only used Windows for years (at home). When I got my first
computer (486) I put Slackware on it, no Windows. Never looked back.
Cheers,
Daniel.
--
/\/`) http://oooauthors.org
On 11/20/05, John Boyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> To Discuss and Daniel Carrera: Your suggestions are being followed by me
> as fast as I can. I need one KVM switch so I can use my monitor for both
> Win and Linux, until I get my Linux under control, I mean knowledge
> control. I bought a 64
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Terri Sprague wrote:
Quite a few of us, even though we have internet satellite
connections, do not stay connected all the time. In my
opinion, that is a disaster waiting to happen because of
hackers, viruses, etc.
Why not switch to Linux or Mac OS and avoid the problem
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 20:15:39 -, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ian Lynch wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 18:32 +, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
MS is the only OS that have virus. think about it? Not even your
cellphone running Symbian OS has vriuses.
Windows 9
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 20:15:39 -, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ian Lynch wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 18:32 +, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
MS is the only OS that have virus. think about it? Not even your
cellphone running Symbian OS has vriuses.
Windows 95/98 was the most large sca
Ian Lynch wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 18:32 +, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
MS is the only OS that have virus. think about it? Not even your cellphone
running Symbian OS has vriuses.
Windows 95/98 was the most large scale virus ever deployed ;-)
About five years ago, there was a site on
I have read about this columns 100 times, but I have never seen one actual
virus. Why dont you just show us a linux machine infected with a virus
Chad.
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 18:50:11 -, Chad Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/19/05, Alexandro Colorado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MS
On Sunday 20 Nov 2005 04:50, Chad Smith trolled:
> On 11/19/05, Alexandro Colorado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > MS is the only OS that have virus. think about it? Not even your
> > cellphone running Symbian OS has vriuses.
>
> http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2143697/grisoft-warns-linux-virus
>
On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 13:50 -0500, Chad Smith wrote:
> Grisoft predicts Linux virus plague
This is typical of a Chad Smith post. Whenever anyone looks at the
future and what might happen as Open Source software gets increasing
take up Chad ignores it and focuses on now and the past because it sui
Saying that a virus company warns about Linux virus is like saying
Microsoft warns that firefox can be a virus when you try to download it.
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 18:50:11 -, Chad Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/19/05, Alexandro Colorado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MS is the only OS
On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 18:32 +, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>
> MS is the only OS that have virus. think about it? Not even your cellphone
> running Symbian OS has vriuses.
Windows 95/98 was the most large scale virus ever deployed ;-)
--
Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ZMS Ltd
On 11/19/05, Alexandro Colorado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> MS is the only OS that have virus. think about it? Not even your cellphone
> running Symbian OS has vriuses.
http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2143697/grisoft-warns-linux-virus
Grisoft predicts Linux virus plague
'Only a matter of
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:59:17 -, Shawn K. Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 21:06 -0800, Terri Sprague wrote:
I am one of over a million RV full-timers in the US.
Quite a few of us, even though we have internet satellite connections,
do not stay connected all th
On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 21:06 -0800, Terri Sprague wrote:
> I am one of over a million RV full-timers in the US.
> Quite a few of us, even though we have internet satellite connections,
> do not stay connected all the time. In my opinion, that is a
> disaster waiting to happen because of hackers, vir
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 05:06:51 -, Terri Sprague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
As a user, I hate online only apps. In fact, I think
they are becoming
more and more popular because they are being offered
at less cost that
the offline versions.
I think we should divide what aree web-apps and
Terri Sprague wrote:
Quite a few of us, even though we have internet satellite
connections, do not stay connected all the time. In my
opinion, that is a disaster waiting to happen because of
hackers, viruses, etc.
Why not switch to Linux or Mac OS and avoid the problem altogether?
The problem o
As a user, I hate online only apps. In fact, I think
they are becoming
more and more popular because they are being offered
at less cost that
the offline versions.
While I am online quite often (ok, my husband say that
is a gross
understatement), when I am online it's because I am
doing somethi
21 matches
Mail list logo
