On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 02:19:28 -0400
Lyle Kempler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Git is interesting and all, and may offer some development advantages,
> but I keep harking back to 2 statements made earlier in this thread: 1)
> that we're interested in performance, and 2) the developer base is
> prett
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 23:43:47 -0400
Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CPU load depends entirely on the box, but anoncvs is a P4 1.7 GHz with
> 15 minute load averages fairly consistently under 2. And it's doing
> Not exactly. The machine is doing fine; the only problem is that I
> ha
On 8/17/06, Lyle Kempler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally I don't get why we're not creating nightly diffs and a
> tarball once a week and letting people use that (it's not exactly
> difficult to script). I highly doubt most users care about checkins in
> the last few hours, and I suggested
Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
> On 8/17/06, Lyle Kempler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Personally I don't get why we're not creating nightly diffs and a
>> tarball once a week and letting people use that (it's not exactly
>> difficult to script). I highly doubt most users care about checkins in
>>
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 01:41:31 + Aleksej Struk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:16:11AM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:16:34 + Aleksej Struk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > babbled:
> >
> > >
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > I'm currently compiled th
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:39:37PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 01:41:31 + Aleksej Struk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:16:11AM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > > On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:16:34 + Aleksej Struk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
Hello,
I had this conversation on the E Users list and got no response. Basically
some users are complaining that ecore doesn't build on some systems unless you
disable ecore-fb.
My opinion is that we should disable ecore-fb by default until someone fixes
the ecore-fb section of the configu
Maybe a little out of context but Aleksej wrote:
> So, from the user perspective, I have to "think" - what is going on, and
> which bg is the current. iirc, the ideology of good gui is "make user to
> think as less as possible".
It works that way for MS Windows, I guess. But it's not a good ui p
And two more comments/question to those I already sent.
1). I open the wallpaper cfg dialog and I do not have any selected bg.
Then if I click the right mouse button on some bg, I get a context menu.
>From this menu i can delete/rename the item I right clicked. But,
i do not have this item select
Stafford Horne wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I had this conversation on the E Users list and got no response. Basically
> some users are complaining that ecore doesn't build on some systems unless
> you disable ecore-fb.
>
> My opinion is that we should disable ecore-fb by default until someone fixes
>
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 03:47:54PM +0300, Eugen Minciu wrote:
> Maybe a little out of context but Aleksej wrote:
>
> > So, from the user perspective, I have to "think" - what is going on, and
> > which bg is the current. iirc, the ideology of good gui is "make user to
> > think as less as possibl
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:28:26 + Aleksej Struk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:39:37PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 01:41:31 + Aleksej Struk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > babbled:
> >
> > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:16:11AM +0900, Carsten Hait
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:15:13 +0200 Stéphane Bauland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
> > On 8/17/06, Lyle Kempler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Personally I don't get why we're not creating nightly diffs and a
> >> tarball once a week and letting people use that (it
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:55:00 + Aleksej Struk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> And two more comments/question to those I already sent.
>
> 1). I open the wallpaper cfg dialog and I do not have any selected bg.
> Then if I click the right mouse button on some bg, I get a context menu.
> >From
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:37:18 +0800 Stafford Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Hello,
>
> I had this conversation on the E Users list and got no response. Basically
> some users are complaining that ecore doesn't build on some systems unless
> you disable ecore-fb.
>
> My opinion is that we
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:29:07PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:28:26 + Aleksej Struk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:39:37PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > > On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 01:41:31 + Aleksej Struk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> what do you say? would people be willing to switch to such snaps?
As user that just wanna have a "working" e17, so when a bugs is
pulling my leg, I sync every day. When everything just works fine
(as it does this week, for instance), I sync once a month, when
I think about it ;p
Since I use my
On 8/17/06, Enlightenment CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -SUBDIRS = $(edb_subdir) $(eet_subdir) $(gif_subdir) $(jpeg_subdir)
> $(png_subdir) $(tiff_subdir) $(xpm_subdir)
> +if BUILD_LOADER_SVG
> +xvg_subdir = svg
Is this a typo ? Wouldn't it be svg_loader = svg ?
> +endif
> +
> +SUBDIRS = $(ed
On 8/17/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
personally i would have no problem in a server-side auto-build of tarballs.what do people think? should we perhaps have the anoncvs server do daily (ormaybe several times per day) builds of packages? not rpm or deb but "make
dist
On 8/17/06, Chady Kassouf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 8/17/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > personally i would have no problem in a server-side auto-build of
> tarballs.
> > what do people think? should we perhaps have the anoncvs server do daily
> (
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:30:27 +0200 "Bertrand Jacquin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> On 8/17/06, Enlightenment CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -SUBDIRS = $(edb_subdir) $(eet_subdir) $(gif_subdir) $(jpeg_subdir)
> > $(png_subdir) $(tiff_subdir) $(xpm_subdir) +if BUILD_LOADER_SVG
> > +xvg_subdir
Aleksej Struk wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 03:47:54PM +0300, Eugen Minciu wrote:
>> Maybe a little out of context but Aleksej wrote:
>>
>>> So, from the user perspective, I have to "think" - what is going on, and
>>> which bg is the current. iirc, the ideology of good gui is "make user to
>>>
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:50:22 +0200 "Chady Kassouf"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/17/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > personally i would have no problem in a server-side auto-build of
> > tarballs.
> > what do people think? should we perhaps have t
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:20:02 GMT "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've attached a librsvg based svg loader for evas in case
> you might find it useful.. it uses a scale of 90 dpi for rendering,
> and needs librsvg >= 2.13.
>
> If you want to give this a try, you will h
On 8/17/06, Stafford Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I had this conversation on the E Users list and got no response. Basically
some users are complaining that ecore doesn't build on some systems unless you
disable ecore-fb.
My opinion is that we should disable ecore-fb by default un
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:46:26 -0400 dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Attached is a patch to make the ecore_desktop_icon_find function use
> and return const strings. It doesn't appear to modify these strings
> (and it still works once constified).
>
> But, I wanted to send it here before
* Chady Kassouf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 8/17/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >personally i would have no problem in a server-side auto-build of
> >tarballs. what do people think? should we perhaps have the anoncvs
> >server do daily (or maybe several times
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:43:30 -0400 (EDT) Enlightenment CVS
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
damn - i forgot to commit my configure.in changes... bugger.
> Enlightenment CVS committal
>
> Author : sebastid
> Project : e17
> Module : libs/evas
>
> Dir : e17/libs/evas
>
>
> Modified Files:
>
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 03:37:06 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:50:22 +0200 "Chady Kassouf"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 8/17/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > personally i would have no problem
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 03:43:38 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:20:02 GMT "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've attached a librsvg based svg loader for evas in case
> > you might find it useful.. it uses a scale of 90 dpi for renderi
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:50:22 +0200 "Chady Kassouf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> On 8/17/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > personally i would have no problem in a server-side auto-build of
> > tarballs.
> > what do people think? should we perhaps have t
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:45:19 -0400 Lyle Kempler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> * Chady Kassouf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On 8/17/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >personally i would have no problem in a server-side auto-build of
> > >tarballs. what do peo
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:20:02 GMT "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
in cvs - needs work - as per my reply to david - but it does work - thanks! :)
>David:
>
> I've attached a librsvg based svg loader for evas in case
> you might find it useful.. it uses a scale of 90 dpi
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:56:54 +0200
Stéphane Bauland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stafford Horne wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I had this conversation on the E Users list and got no response. Basically
> > some users are complaining that ecore doesn't build on some systems unless
> > you disable ec
On Friday, 18 August 2006, at 08:21:17 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> agreed. i am not advocating REMOVING anoncvs as such - just removing
> it as a "first priority anonymous source access" mechanism. putting
> anoncvs access info into fineprint in some obscure page linked off a
> download pag
Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Friday, 18 August 2006, at 08:21:17 (+0900),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
>
>> agreed. i am not advocating REMOVING anoncvs as such - just removing
>> it as a "first priority anonymous source access" mechanism. putting
>> anoncvs access info into fineprint in some obs
On Thursday, 17 August 2006, at 11:15:50 (+0300),
Eugen Minciu wrote:
> Any statistics on the load when 24 anon checkouts occur?
Not specifically, but over the past 24 hours, the max 1 minute load
average was 17.55, and the max 15 minute load average was 8.56.
Looks like 1800-2200 UTC is our pea
Hi everyone.
I've been doing some thinking today. And I've been doing some testing as well.
And there are a few things I realized.
The first thing I realized is a reason why the pseudo-benchmark I created was
giving out evil data. In git's case this is because git does a lot of extra
operation
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:27:11 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 03:43:38 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
> > On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:20:02 GMT "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I've attached a li
Chady Kassouf wrote:
> On 8/17/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> personally i would have no problem in a server-side auto-build of
>> tarballs.
>> what do people think? should we perhaps have the anoncvs server do daily
>> (or
>> maybe several times per day)
> beware. this is relatively inefficient for icons. the resulting
> evas images are generally big (1000x1000 or bigger). i need to:
>
Ha! They're hard to miss that way :)
Rendering them at any given pixel size is fairly easy:
if their default size is w0xh0 say, and you want them
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 06:04:37 +0300 Eugen Minciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Hi everyone.
>
> I've been doing some thinking today. And I've been doing some testing as
> well. And there are a few things I realized.
>
> The first thing I realized is a reason why the pseudo-benchmark I created wa
42 matches
Mail list logo
