A mailbox will not appear in the store until it's either logged into or it
receives email.
Can you connect to the mailbox using MAPI?
Have you modified your GAL at any point? (By default, it should have a policy
of "mailnickname=*".)
You should be getting event log errors when RUS runs and onc
Powershell is good stuff :)
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 4:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SMTP traffic monitoring - thanks Rob!
I just needed to get a feel for what's hit the SMTP server in the last 30 days
(err, 350,000 records aft
I just needed to get a feel for what's hit the SMTP server in the last 30 days
(err, 350,000 records after changing the result size). Of course now I can also
find average message sizes, etc...
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 1:46 P
You're welcome!
Note - that's only getting a fixed number of log entries. If you want to do
daily reporting, we'll need to change that to use a startdate and enddate
calculated from the current datetime.
It should be fine for a quick look at what's hit it recently.
From: David Lum [mailto:dav
You sir, and the bomb! Thank you very much I am in business, I now have exactly
what I am looking for.
Thanks again,
Dave
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 12:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SMTP traffic monitoring
Th
Follow up:
Ran domainprep on the child domain.
Created the RUS for the child domain, had to make a couple of adjustments here
for NETBIOS to resolve right.
Still no luck with the OAB errors when the users hit Send / Receive to download
them.
I decided to try to setting up a test mail user in
Is he using offline folders? Is that what the server says or the
client?
From: Kyle Plummer [mailto:kplum...@nje.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 2:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bounce message puzzler
Yes, but he still has about 250MB to go. The attachments are rough
As a test, you could remove the quota on this specific mailbox & try again.
Just an idea, shot in the dark.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Kyle Plummer wrote:
> Yes, but he still has about 250MB to go. The attachments are roughly
> 50KB, total.
>
>
>
> Kyle B. Plummer
>
I had a similar problem once, but it was a 5.6.0, not a 5.2.1.
The problem there was that the Thunderbird Client that our customer was using
was attaching files in a way that our Exchange 2007 system didn't like. It
called the emails corrupt and refused to deliver them.
Our details were differe
There is a "hostname" field. Whether there's anything in it or not will depend
on whether the client reported it.
Add "hostname" to the select to add the column.
I could probably script a dns lookup to backfill it after the fact.
It truncates automatically on the screen display.
You can try a
Yep! Is there a way to add 'hostname"? Also, is there a way to make it not
truncate "Sender" - a way to make the default column with something different?
A formatting option I am sure.
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 9:25 AM
To: MS-
Any mailbox quota's on the recipient?
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Kyle Plummer wrote:
> Nope. The sender can successfully e-mail the internal recipient as long
> as he does not attach any files. Any attachment causes the message to
> bounce, neither size nor type matters. It only affects t
Nope. The sender can successfully e-mail the internal recipient as long
as he does not attach any files. Any attachment causes the message to
bounce, neither size nor type matters. It only affects this one sender
to this one internal recipient.
Kyle B. Plummer
How about a RBL? Do you use any of these? I had that happen to me that we
couldn't send any mail to only one other company due to the fact that they
were blacklisted for a day at one point. Removed the RBL and boom, the mail
went through.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Kyle Plummer wrote:
>
I forwarded the message to my Gmail account, and forwarded it from there
back into the internal recipient. No problem. It appears to be
specifically from this one sender to this one internal recipient and
only if the sender attaches a file of any size or type.
I'm now simply waiting for the sen
Yes, the NDR comes from our domain.
No chance on the PF. I also checked the internal recipient's rules to
make sure he hadn't set anything up for this sender. None.
No, on the last one.
Kyle B. Plummer
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Are you 100% sure the the NDR comes from your Exchange org.?
What about public folders? Is there any chance the affected user's email is
being forwarded to a mail enabled PF? There are some Google hits out there
that are similar to your scenario.
Lastly, and this one is way out there, by any ch
The 5.2.1 typically indicates that it's a size issue. Are you sure he
doesn't have something set up locally? Can you send him an attachment
of the same size or the same attachment?
From: Kyle Plummer [mailto:kplum...@nje.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Iss
Take the attachment and send it to your Gmail account then you send from your
Gmail account to the 'bad' recipient with the same attachment.
From: Kyle Plummer [mailto:kplum...@nje.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 12:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bounce message puzzler
Tr
How does the other recipient's address look in the headers of the copy you
received?
From: Kyle Plummer [mailto:kplum...@nje.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bounce message puzzler
Tried that. Same result. I can send an e-mail to the "sender
Tried that. Same result. I can send an e-mail to the "sender" and the
internal recipient, and have the "sender" reply back with an attachment
- I get the message, but the other internal recipient does not. The
"sender" gets the same bounce message.
Working on the SMTP logs now. Just waiting fo
Does it work with just
| select clientip,totalbytes,timestamp
?
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SMTP traffic monitoring
Money, this works. Adding "| Select clientip,totalbytes,timestamp | ft -auto"
b
I have GFI MailEssentials and VIPRE on the server. That doesn't seem to
be the issue as the sender can send the exact same message to me
successfully.
Kyle B. Plummer
From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:joe.poched...@fivesgroup.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11
Money, this works. Adding "| Select clientip,totalbytes,timestamp | ft -auto"
breaks it though.
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 3:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SMTP traffic monitoring
OK. Let's see if any of them ar
Have them reply to a message originally sent from the intended recipient
with the attachment?
-Paul
From: Kyle Plummer [mailto:kplum...@nje.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bounce message puzzler
He's actually trying to receive a m
Third.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bounce message puzzler
Then I second the suggestion to
Is there an AV or spam scanning solution in front of your Exchange server that
may be blocking the message?
From: Kyle Plummer [mailto:kplum...@nje.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bounce message puzzler
Nothing in the Event Logs. I'll enabl
Nothing in the Event Logs. I'll enable SMTP logging and will ask the
sender to send the message again.
Kyle B. Plummer
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 10:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
Does message tracking throw up any results? or can you trace the email
on your gateway solution?
John
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: 10 March 2010 16:18
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bounce message puzzler
The
Then I second the suggestion to visit the smtp logs.
From: Kyle Plummer [mailto:kplum...@nje.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bounce message puzzler
He's actually trying to receive a message from someone outside the Exchange
org. I do not kn
He's actually trying to receive a message from someone outside the
Exchange org. I do not know how the sender is addressing the message.
Kyle B. Plummer
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 10:47 AM
T
Does he get the same result if he tries to send it via OWA?
From: Kyle Plummer [mailto:kplum...@nje.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 9:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Bounce message puzzler
I'm hoping some of the brilliant people on this list can help. E-mails from
just one of ou
Look at the even log for the server where that mailbox resides. If nothing is
there then turn up the SMPT logging and look at the actual smtp transaction and
see what it says.
From: Kyle Plummer [mailto:kplum...@nje.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 10:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subj
Is he addressing it out of the GAL, a local AB, or a nickname resolution?
From: Kyle Plummer [mailto:kplum...@nje.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 9:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bounce message puzzler
Not really. The receiving message size limit is set to use the default, w
Not really. The receiving message size limit is set to use the default,
which is roughly 15MB (today's attachment was 50KB). Message
restrictions are set to accept messages from everyone.
Kyle B. Plummer
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnolo
Are there any delivery restrictions on the recipient's mailbox?
From: Kyle Plummer [mailto:kplum...@nje.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 9:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Bounce message puzzler
I'm hoping some of the brilliant people on this list can help. E-mails from
just one o
I'm hoping some of the brilliant people on this list can help. E-mails
from just one of our clients is bounced every time he sends a message
with an attachment to a specific person in our firm with the following
error:
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Su
Hello,
I have conducted a ½ day Outlook class for some of my corporate
clients and the U.S. Marine Corps and the clients reported decreased help desk
calls related to Outlook and much happier users. I include a cheat sheet that
covers tasks like creating folders , group scheduling an
Cut out personal email completely and I'm betting that would double your
productivity.
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 8:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Orla?
Our CEO claims it will save the company money. Seems to me just teachin
Well….it works really well actually. It isn’t well documented though, I’ll
grant you that.
I’ve done a half-dozen live upgrades 2003 -> 2010 so far, and am working on
another half-dozen. I’ve got long lists of things to catch and do.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http:/
Thanks Michael. I found several Google threads pertaining to this. It is my
perception that Exchange 2010 integration with Exchange 2003 is not fully
baked. Exchange signature errors, validation errors, nominated Recipient Update
Service errors, home MDB errors etc. etc. and everything seems to
Our CEO claims it will save the company money. Seems to me just teaching folks
how to use Outlook 2007 would yield a *far* higher ROI. The cost for this thing
is $105K for the first year and $20k/yr afterward. For 400 people! These same
folks already complain that Outlook 2K7 is buggy...so yeah,
I feel like I'm reading an infomercial. I'm just waiting for Vince the
ShamWow guy to jump out on the screen.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr <
michealespin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Web page brokenly designed to look Mac-ish. -100 pts.
>
> --
> ME2
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010
Anyone watch the "Training Program"? What does ksladjlskjflsslfdks
mean?
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 5:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Orla?
Web page brokenly designed to look Mac-ish. -100 pts.
--
ME2
This is a known issue. Ignore it. 12639 is the correct signature value.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: chipsh...@comcast.net [mailto:chipsh...@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 6:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: D
Slowly doing a migration from Exchange 2003 SP2 to Exchange 2010. Using the MS
Exchange Best Practices analyzer returns the Domain has an unknown Exchange
signature. Ref: http :// technet . microsoft .com/en-us/library/aa997081( EXCHG
.80). aspx . My objectVersion is 12639.
Exchange 2003 w
46 matches
Mail list logo
