Check with ISP
MX records not configured correctly it is not pointing your mail server
it is resolving to wrong IP number
-Original Message-
From: Albert Vasquez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000
Title: Message
Hi
Guys
I am in the process
of planning our migration from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 - I have finished
migrating our domain to Active Directory and that all went pretty smoothly,
but there were a few gotchas not mentioned in any documentation and MS's way of
doing t
Title: RE: Exchange 2000 proplemcan't receive mail...
Looks like authentication problem between your server and smarthost or what ever you are using to send mail.
Eugene Pesochin
Systems Manager
ClubMom, Inc.
200 Madison Ave. 6th Fl
New York, New York 10016
tel 646.435.656
Cisco
Unity is very nice. They just came out with Unity 3 which allows for great user
management.
-Original Message-From: Kevin.Lin
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001
6:38 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Unified
Message System on Exchange 2000
Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 7:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: [Fixed] RE: Exchange 2000 Backup permissions?
Cool. The problem was an exchange 5.5 dll called edbbcli.dll in the
winnt\system32 directory. Renamed this and the backup is running now
.
If you rename the 5.5 dll, one of the exchange targets disappears from
NTbackup and it works.
Cheers,
Marty
-Original Message-
From: STEVE BROOK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: [Fixed] RE: Exchange 200
Title: RE: [Fixed] RE: Exchange 2000 Backup permissions?
Thanks, this could be very useful in tracking down my problems
SB
-Original Message-
From: Marty Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: [Fixed
Use a public folder and sort threads by conversation.
-Original Message-
From: Jan S. Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Threaded discussion forum in Exchange 2000
Hi,
Anybody got a clue how to setup a
Hi,
Does anyone know of a good site to reference for Lotus Notes to Exchange
2000 conversion?
I missed the technical chat that MS was putting on and can't seem to
find the transcript
Thanks,
Darrin Carter
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Title: Message
Do you
have owner or permissions admin permissions on the folders in exchange
admin?
-Original Message-From: Bruce Fyfe
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 3:42
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook/Exchange
2000 Public Folder
Hi,
Does anyone of you have any links to case studies regarding clustering W2k
and E2k? I've been checking out Microsoft, but I couldn't find anything...
maybe I was not looking thoroughly enough?
Kind regards,
Rick Harderwijk
Systems Administrator
Factotum Media BV
Oosterengweg 44
1212 CN Hilv
Hi All,
I have problem with this situation. And need your advise.
Site A is an old email server, previously it serve Public group users and
private group users.
Now, the company has decided get a Exchange 2000 mail server to locate at
Site B, and they prefer this exchange 2000 mail server
Title: Message
This is a question for someone who has used
Exchange 2000 for a while.
What disadvantages are there to using Terminal
Server to administer an Exchange 2000 server?
What type
of problems might occur when Terminal Services are used to Logon and Administer
an Exchange
Just an FYI.
Check out the upcoming chat on Exchange 2000 (April 10, 10am PT/1pm ET) -
You can find more information about this chat on
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/itcommunity/chats/.
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com
Title: RE: IIS on an Exchange 2000 box
SecureIIS!!!
Jim Zangara, MCSE+I, A+
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer
Premiere Radio Networks
A Division of Clear Channel Communications
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
Direct: (818) 461-8620
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Title: RE: IIS on an Exchange 2000 box
Gota try at least.
-Original Message-
From: Zangara, Jim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:51
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IIS on an Exchange
2000 box
SecureIIS
..
-Original Message-From: daniele
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 4:30
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: IIS on an
Exchange 2000 box
Gota try at
least.
-Original
Message-From: Zangara,
Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday
Hello all,
i've had a test exchange 2000 server running live
in my network for 6 months now. it was set up for 7 people to play with
and evaluate and is just running on a PIII workstation. everything has
worked out great and we are now putting in a full-flege install of exchange
What do the NDRs say from the Exchange side?
Are these both in the same SMTP domain?
-Original Message-
From: Garrett Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 7:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 coexisting with Groupwise 6
Hello,
I&#x
Thank you for your response. As I stated, they are in the same DNS
domain. The bounce messages weren't the greatest, but I will post one of
them when I get it.
Thanks again,
Garrett
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Here is the bounce message. Notice the strange CN on the Groupwise
Address.
> From: System Administrator
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:14 AM
> To: /O=FIRST ORGANIZATION/OU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE
> GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Ceb6db53-1c103fc7-3c1bc718-a4029f3f
> Subject: Undeliver
Title: RE: STORE.EXE 99% CPU exchange 2000 SP3
Could be your Anti-Virus. Is that running on the server? IF so, who's and what version is it?
If you have AV on the server try cycling the AV service. If that doesn't correct it, rebooting may help.
-Rick
>-Original Messa
Title: Message
Some updated fun for
Monday morning:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/prodtech/mailexch/opsguide/default.asp
It's available for
download as a 130 page .pdf file as well.
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/release.asp?releaseid=40807
I am having a problem shutting off relaying on a Exchange 2000 server.
I had it turned off (confirmed by being removed from the ORBS list). In
trying to fix some problems that one user was having sending mail from
his Mac, I turned it back on (and tried turning off "Anonymous access&qu
How about using the "From" field in Outlook to specify the specific
address.
> Afternoon!
>
> So, I know I don't know everything about exchange but my hope is that one =
> of you might have the answer to this question.
>
> Let's say I have a user that needs to be able to send and receive e-mail
I should have been more specifc. I'd like them to be able to send these messages with
different identities WITHOUT having to type the address in during each message. Also,
I want to ensure that if someone gets a message at [EMAIL PROTECTED], that any
replies sent by joe get tagged with the same
I would think you could create forms for each identity.
-Original Message-
From: Steven Dunn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 4:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Question on Exchange 2000 & Outlook 2002
I should have been more specifc. I&#x
What is the correct procedure to rename an Exchange 2000 server?
I am familiar with the procedure to rename an Exchange 5.5 server, which is NOT a
whole lotta fun. Is it similar with Exchange 2000?
I have a customer that needs to change the name of his Exchange 2000 server because
it&#
Title: RE: Exchange 2000 un-specific addressed email
Don't know about E2K, but on Exchange 5.5, on the Internet Mail Service Properties on the Internet tab, the administrators mailbox for NDR's can be set to whatever mailbox you want it to go to, just pick it from the GAL.
---
Title: RE: Exchange 2000 un-specific addressed email
For
Exchange 2000: When in the Exchange System Manager a search for "NDR" in the
Help file returns this as the first entry.
Store NDRs
When a message is undeliverable, Exchange returns it to the sender with a
NDR. Yo
This is not a function of the product. There is no catch-all
functionality in Exchange. It adheres to RFCs 2821 and 2822.
William
-Original Message-
From: Norm Snowden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 7:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000
Is there a particular problem you are having, like too many misspelled
addresses?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 un-specific addressed email
This is not
No problem of mis-spelled issues. The ISP we used to use enabled all
non-specific addressed email for the domain to go to my boss's email
account. Now that we switched to exchange and hosting email inhouse, I
have to figure out how to get the non-specific email delivered to the
boss. I know that
-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 un-specific addressed email
No problem of mis-spelled issues. The ISP we used to use enabled all
non-specific addressed email for the domain to go to my boss's email
account. Now that we switched to exchange and hosting email inhouse, I
ha
Interesting. Unfortunately all "errors" go to the admin mailbox, which you
can specify in 5.5, not sure how that works in e2k.
-Original Message-
From: Norm Snowden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exc
Same in 2K.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 un-specific addressed email
Interesting. Unfortunately all "errors" go to the admin mailbox, which
you can
IN E2k the go to the "postmaster". Essentially the same but you can designate the
postmaster to be someone other than the admin.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 5:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchan
Same in 5.5.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 un-specific addressed email
IN E2k the go to the "postmaster". Essentially the same but you can
des
It's just unfortunate that the e-mail comes into that account more like an
attachment.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 un-specific addressed email
Sa
Actually, in Exchange2000, you won't get the body of the errant email in
the admin box.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 un-specific addressed email
It&#
ange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 un-specific addressed email
Actually, in Exchange2000, you won't get the body of the errant email in
the admin box.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Iss
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 un-specific addressed email
Actually, in Exchange2000, you won't get the body of the errant email in
the admin box.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
min Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 un-specific addressed email
Does that mean it's better, or worse. Seems to me that the e-mails
should go to the postmaster, with the NDR to the sender if that's what
the RFC says, but still be able to be easily forwarded to the proper
person.
-
Way better!!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 un-specific addressed email
The message comes in as an NDR message, but if you click the "Send Again"
ange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 un-specific addressed email
It's an annoyance. The content is still there. You have to resend the
message to see it.
I didn't mind the NDR with the message as an attachment in 5.5.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EM
I always checked and forwarded in Exchange5.5.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 un-specific addressed email
I thought 5.5 sucked the way it handled that, or maybe
You need AD running before you can install Exchange 2k
-Original Message-
From: Dennis DeVries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 3:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: exchange 5.5 to exchange 2000 migration
All:
We are a small business, 1 exchange server/PDC
Title: RE: exchange 5.5 to exchange 2000 migration
Really? I have never heard that.
Why is upgrading to SP3 such a problem? I insist on mine running SP4. I reinstall the SP every time a change is made as well.
-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
Title: RE: exchange 5.5 to exchange 2000 migration
I
never really worked on 5.5. But I do know you need AD(active
directory) installed before you can even think about installing exchange
2k
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 17
Title: RE: exchange 5.5 to exchange 2000 migration
Well you learn something new everyday. I didn't
know that AD was a REQUIREMENT to run 2k. I guess that answers my coworkers'
question as to why I have not upgraded to 2k. My answer was always, "I
don't upgrade just to
Title: Message
AD is
required to run Exchange 2000. AD is not a requirement to run Windows 2000. I'll
suppose I'll even mention that AD only runs on Windows 2000 just in
case.
Exchange 2000 requires AD because the directory information that used to
be in 5.5 is now AD. In order
Title: RE: exchange 5.5 to exchange 2000 migration
Sounds
like you are doing a migration, not an upgrade. We are in the process of
migrating everything from the 5.5 box to a new W2k/E2k box and our 5.5 server is
on SP4 and I have not had any problems thus far. Perhaps the SP3
requirement
Title: Message
>>Really? I have never heard
that.
It's
only at the very front of almost every single document/book/whitepaper ever
written in regards to Exchange 2000 deployment and
migration.
For
example: http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/E2Kupgra
the documents about Exchange 2000 and
rely on broad articles by pulp magazines to decide in which direction they will
go. The unfortunate side affect of Microsoft growing up as an "easy to use"
desktop operating system is that many managers think that all Microsoft products
are easy t
Title: Message
Mongo
run setup.exe
-Original Message-From: Schwartz, Jim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 9:16
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: exchange 5.5
to exchange 2000 migration
William,
Surprisingly, I've talked to a numb
ubject: RE: exchange 5.5
to exchange 2000 migration
Mongo run setup.exe
-Original Message-From: Schwartz, Jim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 9:16
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: exchange
5.5 to exchange 2000 migration
Title: Message
-Original Message-From: Andy David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 6:22
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: exchange 5.5
to exchange 2000 migration
Mongo run setup.exe
-Original Message-From: Schwartz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 9:16
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: exchange
5.5 to exchange 2000 migration
William,
Surprisingly, I've talked to a number of people who
still haven't grasped that concept. Most of the organiz
Title: Message
What
is this Mongo, Thongo?
-Original Message-From: Andy David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 6:22
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: exchange 5.5
to exchange 2000 migration
Mongo run setup.exe
-Original
Title: Message
Mongo
run network seat of pants.
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21,
2002 2:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
exchange 5.5 to exchange 2000 migration
What
is this Mongo, Thongo
t: RE: exchange 5.5 to
exchange 2000 migration
Mongo run network seat of
pants.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:23
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: exchange 5.5 to
exchange 2000 migration
What is
Admin Issues
Subject: SMTP relay - Windows/Exchange 2000 upgrade
My current exchange environment consists of a single Exchange 5.5 server
on my inside network and an SMTP relay (IIS 4.0) in my DMZ. I am in the
process of upgrading my servers from NT4 to 2000. My SMTP relay in the
DMZ is running
Just make sure to turn off 8bitmine.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 4:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SMTP relay - Windows/Exchange 2000 upgrade
If you are going to maintain the IIS relay in the DMZ
-Original Message-
From: Matt Moore [mailto:mattmoore...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 4:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Uninstall Exchange 2000
For no trouble, only "The Administrator" account should be used. Even the
combo below doesn't have all the
Exchange 2000 - Install new 2007
I haven't had any luck on this E2000 uninstall, but I haven't had the time to
research it any further.
My next task on this network is to install a new E2007 server. (We already have
E2007 installed and we're migrating to better hardware). I'm
It's a warning
Steve Hart
Network Administrator
503.491.4343 -Direct | 503.492.8160 - Fax
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 1:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Uninstall Exchange 2000 - In
The main challenge I _think_ you will have is that the install will try to
create a routing group connector and (depending on how much of the 2000 server
is left in AD) use the SMTP virtual server on the Exchange 2000 server to send
email.
You can defeat that by, after completing the install
3 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 Errors in the event log.
Hi,
Can anyone shed any light on any of these errors, the event log was
filled with 100s of these this morning
Event ID: 9153
Microsoft Exchange System Attendant reported an error '0xc007056b' when
set
Drew,
We have Win2K SP2 and there have been no changes to the server
whatsoever
Thanks
Stu
-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 November 2001 13:29
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Errors in the event log.
Have you looked these
se it.
www.disclaimit.com
There are several others. I bet there may even be a list at
www.slipstick.com
William
-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Creating an Event Sink in Exchange 2000
On t
/sag_DNS_imp_MigrationIssues.htm
-Original Message-
From: ONG Liang Bu (CSC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 02:19
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Migrating to Active Directory before Exchange 2000
Hi,
Need some help on this one. I am still in the process of
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone - 651-225-3895
fax - 651-225-7695
-Original Message-
From: ONG Liang Bu (CSC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 1:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Migrating to Active Directory before Exchange 2000
Hi,
Need some help on this
MS just jumped into the upgrade. They may have suggested otherwise.
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 10:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Migrating to Active Directory before Exchange 2000
find and use the
: Migrating to Active Directory before Exchange 2000
MS just jumped into the upgrade. They may have suggested otherwise.
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 10:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Migrating to Active
MS-ITG or MS-dogfood?
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 7:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Migrating to Active Directory before Exchange 2000
MS ran W2K in beta and other forms for 7 months before installing
I have a small Win2k test domain going with 1 DC and I am setting up
Exchange on a separate member server. I ran forestprep and domainprep then
installed exchange. When I go into Active Directory Users and Computers, the
existing user accounts don't have any Exchange information. When I create a
n
Make sure the second domain new.com has MX records pointing to your
Exchange 2000 server, and then create a recipient policy in Exchange
System Manager for new.com. This new recipient policy should be
configured to give your users the new.com SMTP address. Make sure you
create a new recipient
Thanks a lot : it works perfectly!
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Neil Hobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 6:10 PM
Subject: RE: seve
:47
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: UPGRADE From Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000
Subject: UPGRADE From Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000
Hi
I want to upgrade Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000, and I want to know what
is the best way to do it. It's ok to me to do it by move mailbox
FYI
To: "Announcement list for our OWA Spellchecker"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The latest version of the OWA Spellchecker has support
for Exchange
Server 2000 Service Pack 2. If you have purchased the
OWA
Spellchecker,
please send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and once
we have v
equivalent setting in exchange 2000, or is there one? I have
looked at smtp virtual server, smtp protocols and the actual stmp
connector and don't see it.
Thank You,
Danny
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
All:
I need some of the new OWA features offered by exchange 2000. We are
currently running exchange 5.5 on an NT box. If I install exchange 2000
OWA on another server running win2000, can I access the exchange 5.5
server? Has any one done this? Did you have any problems or suggestions
for me? I
I am in the process of removing the first exchange server from our
Exchange site. The 5.5 server is on Windows 2000 SP1, Exchange sp4.
The 2000 server is on Windows 2000 SP2, Exchange 2000 sp1. After
following the Move Mailbox method (Q259712) and Preparing for conversion
from mixed mode to
:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 and Reroute Incoming SMTP Mail
I just joined the list so I apologize if this has already been covered
before (couldn't find it in the archives).
We have multiple domains which are various spellings of our main domain.
Basically we
EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Adam Meixler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: September 21, 2001 2:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 and Reroute Incoming SMTP Mail
I just joined the list so I apologize if this has already been covered
before (couldn't
2:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Migration from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000
Hi Guys
I am in the process of planning our migration from Exchange 5.5 to
Exchange 2000 - I have finished migrating our domain to Active Directory
and that all went pretty smoothly, but there were a few gotchas n
5.5 to Exchange 2000
Hi
Guys
I am in the
process of planning our migration from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 - I have
finished migrating our domain to Active Directory and that all went
pretty smoothly, but there were a few gotchas not mentioned in any
documentation and MS'
t: RE: Migration from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000
Run the other way! I did a fair amount of reading and preparing and my
migration to Exchange 2k is going over like a lead ballon. I'm just
thankful that I've got new hardware that doesn't have to go into
production immediatly.
Also,
01 12:46 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Migration from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000
100+
and growing. no hitches. except where there were already big
problems..
last
week I decided in the middle of the day I wanted AD at my new job. upgraded.
no plan, no nothin
Message-From: Michael Johnson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:55
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Migration
from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000
KM,
We're in the process of planning our migration to W2k
and E2k also. You mention a book in
Hi, I just have a question regarding security groups and distribution
groups. We are about to migrate to exchange 2000 from exchange 5.5 and in
active directory, we have security groups that have the same name as the
distribution groups. However, the "group name(pre-windows 2000) o
: Lotus Notes 5 to Exchange 2000 migration
Hi,
Does anyone know of a good site to reference for Lotus Notes to Exchange
2000 conversion?
I missed the technical chat that MS was putting on and can't seem to
find the transcript
Thanks,
Darrin Carter
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.su
Could you not get the chat transcript?
William
-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 5:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Lotus Notes 5 to Exchange 2000 migration
Hi,
Does anyone know of a good site to reference
No,
It wasn't listed.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Lotus Notes 5 to Exchange 2000 migration
Could you not get the chat transcript?
William
-Original Me
Exchange 2000 migration
No,
It wasn't listed.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Lotus Notes 5 to Exchange 2000 migration
Could you not get the chat transcript?
Wi
Can I please get a copy of the "Dirty" version of the transcript from
you?
Thanks,
Darrin
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Lotus Notes 5 to Exchange 2000 migrati
connector
that may assist.
William
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server
Hi All,
I have problem with this situation. And need your advise.
Site A
m: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 April 2002 08:09
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server
Which server would the email hit first? What email app is running on Linux?
The native SMTP services? Or something like SendMail?
Is
An: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Betreff: RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server
The smart host option will only work if it is the only Exchange server in
your org, problems start creeping in if there has to be mail between 2
exchange server and a smart host, even if you check "send direc
change Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server
>
>
> The smart host option will only work if it is the only
> Exchange server in your org, problems start creeping in if
> there has to be mail between 2 exchange server and a smart
> host, even
501 - 600 of 750 matches
Mail list logo
