on 12/28/05 7:05 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> John Cowhig now has a job walking around in the forest looking for
> pieces of
>> wood suitable for making guitars. Sounds like a nice job to me.
>>
>
> Who does he work for?
Don't know.
Yahoo! Groups S
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Patrick Gillam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > --- Peter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The TMO has always related "higher
> > John Cowhig now has a job walking around in the forest looking
> > for pieces of
> > wood suitable for making guitars. Sounds like a nice job to me.
>
> Who does he work for?
I'm interested, too, not because John Cowhig means
anything to me, but because I know a few good luthiers,
and am in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 12/27/05 9:13 AM, markmeredith2002 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > It's also how it seems to be done everywhere by tmers who have
worked
> > closely with mmy. A recent example in Canada being Governors Corp,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > --- In Fair
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "markmeredith2002"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > > Different states of consciousness may lead to
> > > different levels of
> > > ethics.
> > >
> > > MMY's point about an enlighte
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- Patrick Gillam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- Peter wrote:
> > >
> > > The TMO has always related "higher levels of
> > > consciousness" with increased moral behavior, but
> > the
> > > research is pretty w
--- Peter wrote:
>
> I'd have to look at it again. But I remember whenever
> I looked at it I was always bothered by some aspects
> of it. Do you have a reference?
Unfortunately, no. I spent some time Googling but couldn't
find a study you could read on the web. (I seldom find studies
I can actu
On Dec 27, 2005, at 10:13 AM, markmeredith2002 wrote: It's also how it seems to be done everywhere by tmers who have worked closely with mmy. A recent example in Canada being Governors Corp, headed up by former personal secretaries John Cowhig and his buddy and by tm-sidhis administrator greg wi
on 12/27/05 9:13 AM, markmeredith2002 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> It's also how it seems to be done everywhere by tmers who have worked
> closely with mmy. A recent example in Canada being Governors Corp,
> headed up by former personal secretaries John Cowhig and his buddy and
> by tm-sidhis
--- Patrick Gillam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Peter wrote:
> >
> > The TMO has always related "higher levels of
> > consciousness" with increased moral behavior, but
> the
> > research is pretty weak in this area.
>
> Have you actually leafed through the journals to
> review
> research
--- Peter wrote:
>
> The TMO has always related "higher levels of
> consciousness" with increased moral behavior, but the
> research is pretty weak in this area.
Have you actually leafed through the journals to review
research on TM and moral behavior, Peter? I somehow
got the impression the re
--- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
>
--- markmeredith2002 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Different states of consciousness may lead to
> > > different levels of
> > > ethics.
> > >
> > > MMY's point about an enlightened person behaving
> in
> > > a li
--- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Different states of consciousness may lead to
> > different levels of
> > ethics.
> >
> > MMY's point about an enlightened person behaving in
> > a life-supportive
> > way has nuances: in CC, one doesn't act in a way
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Diff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Diff
On Dec 26, 2005, at 10:07 PM, sparaig wrote:In Ken's parlance, 'acting unethical is still within dualities, it's merely the photographic negative of ethical activity.' Having said that it is possible to appear to be acting unethically when actually the intent is to awaken. If you've ever re
--- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Different states of consciousness may lead to
> > > different levels of
> > > ethics.
> > >
> > > MMY's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Different states of consciousness may lead to
> > different levels of
> > ethics.
> >
> > MMY's point about an enlightened person behaving in
> > a life-supportive
>
--- Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> on 12/26/05 4:14 PM, Alex Stanley at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> "Ethics won't get you Enlightened. But without
> Ethics you will not
> >> get Enlightened." Want t
--- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Different states of consciousness may lead to
> different levels of
> ethics.
>
> MMY's point about an enlightened person behaving in
> a life-supportive
> way has nuances: in CC, one doesn't act in a way
> that harms one's own
> evolution. In higher
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 26, 2005, at 5:14 PM, Alex Stanley wrote:
>
> > I can well imagine the possibility that an enlightened person
could
> > then go on to act unethically, since the flavor of the dualistic
dream
> > state becomes a wh
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 12/26/05 4:14 PM, Alex Stanley at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> "Ethics won't get you Enlightened. But without Ethics you will
not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 26, 2005, at 1:21 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
>
> > Thanks. One of my favorite topics. I downloaded them.
>
> Uploaded the third of Ken's
>
> Ethics & Enlightenment. Part 3. The Erotic Stock Market of the Kosmos
>
Is
On Dec 26, 2005, at 5:14 PM, Alex Stanley wrote:I can well imagine the possibility that an enlightened person could then go on to act unethically, since the flavor of the dualistic dream state becomes a whole lot less relevant (or, even completely irrelevant?) In Ken's parlance, 'acting unethical
on 12/26/05 4:14 PM, Alex Stanley at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> "Ethics won't get you Enlightened. But without Ethics you will not
>> get Enlightened." Want to know why?
>>
>>
>> The happy dream of Samsara: feeling good
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Ethics won't get you Enlightened. But without Ethics you will not
> get Enlightened." Want to know why?
>
>
> The happy dream of Samsara: feeling good by doing good. The
> Nightmare: hurting ourselves by hurting others.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > on 12/26/05 11:41 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > "Ethics won't get you Enlightened. But without Ethics you will
> n
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 12/26/05 11:41 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > "Ethics won't get you Enlightened. But without Ethics you will
not get
> > Enlightened." Want to know why?
> >
> > The happy dream of Samsara: feeling goo
31 matches
Mail list logo