[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-08 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In Canada, you can have sex with a 14-year-old... > Yeah, just like getting married at 14 in Iowa, South Carolina, and Connecticut with parental consent... And is that actually *worse* than waging war on people?

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-08 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > wrote: > > > > In Canada, you can have sex with a 14-year-old... > > > Yeah, just like getting married at 14 in Iowa, South Carolina, and > Connecticut with

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-09 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > wrote: > > > > > > In Canada, you can have sex with a 14-year-old... > > > > > Yeah

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-09 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > > > wr

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-09 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 1) Why do you assume I was being critical of Canada? Maybe I like > teenage girls and find it appealing that I could go there and fiddle > about legally when I would be locked up doing the same in the US of >

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-09 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > > > wro

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-09 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" > > > wrote

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-09 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > > wrote:

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-09 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I agree that the best way to settle the middle east would have been to > get off of oil entirely, but that's not what has happened. Many things > in the relative involve choosing the lesser evil, that's why it

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-09 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" > wrote: > > > > > > I agree that the best way to settle the middle east would have been > to > > get off of oil entirely, but that's not what has happened. M

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-09 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The leadership of the USA consciously chose to kill to prempt greater > killing in the future. Trying to accomplish the near impossible in the > middle east, a functioning representative democracy. I think that th

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-09 Thread sparaig
Regardless of what I may think of the idea, the democratization of Iraq has been a very long-term neocon goal. You can read about it from nearly 10 years ago on the newamericancentury.org website. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In Fairfie

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-09 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" > wrote: > > The leadership of the USA consciously chose to kill to prempt > greater > > killing in the future. Trying to accomplish the near impossible in >

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-10 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The leadership of the USA consciously chose to kill to prempt > greater killing in the future. Trying to accomplish the near > impossible in the middle east, a functioning representative > democracy. I think tha

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-10 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" > > wrote: > > > The leadership of the USA consciously chose to kill to prempt > > great

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-10 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" > wrote: > > > > The leadership of the USA consciously chose to kill to prempt > > greater killing in the future. Trying to accomplish the near > > impossible in

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-10 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The fascinating thing, for an open-minded TMer, is > to watch the series and think about how Maharishi's > language has shifted over the years into the realm > of scare tactics. He still talks about Sat Yuga > and a b

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-10 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I will take a look. BTW, I didn't say 'the world' I said the lesser > evil in the middle east. Just like I don't think that the TMO's > motives are pure or presented clearly, US's aren't either but I don't > thin

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-10 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote: > > > > > The fascinating thing, for an open-minded TMer, is > > to watch the series and think about how Maharishi's > > language has shifted over the years

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-10 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" > wrote: > > > > I will take a look. BTW, I didn't say 'the world' I said the lesser > > evil in the middle east. Just like I don't think that the TMO's > > m

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-10 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote: > > > > > > > > The fascinating thing, for an open-minded TMer, is > > > to watch the

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-10 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" > > wrote: > > > > > > I will take a look. BTW, I didn't say 'the world' I said the le

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-10 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote: > > > >

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-12 Thread a_non_moose_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > no...not THOSE GUYS...they are on the proverbial SLOW BOAT...we on > the other hand can easily achieve the goal. The trick being to just > not settle for seekerdom anymore. That's it- done...poof...into the > infin

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-12 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" wrote: > > no...not THOSE GUYS...they are on the proverbial SLOW BOAT...we on > > the other hand can easily achieve the goal. The trick being to just > > no

[FairfieldLife] Re: Kentucky? Nah, it's Canada!

2006-02-12 Thread a_non_moose_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" > wrote: > > > no...not THOSE GUYS...they are on the proverbial SLOW BOAT...we on > > >