This message is from: "Mike May, Registrar NFHR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 10:39 PM 8/16/99 -0400, you wrote:
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Mike, everyone,
Mike, the email I received gave me the impression due to the wording approval
was denied. If this is not the case,
This is
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Mike, everyone,
Mike, the email I received gave me the impression due to the wording approval
was denied. If this is not the case, then please resubmit our request for
the September meeting. If approved, we will then discuss with the members
what
This message is from: "Mike May, Registrar NFHR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 02:39 PM 8/13/99 -0400, you wrote:
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Mike, everyone,
As was suggested, we applied for approval to hold an eval, but were not given
approval for two reasons. One is the simple fa
--
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 13, 1999 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: Evaluation questions
> This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hello Mike, everyone,
>
> Steve, by the way, I think an evaluation in that area is a great idea!
Would
&g
This message is from: "Mike May, Registrar NFHR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 02:39 PM 8/13/99 -0400, you wrote:
Hello Mike, everyone,
I will answer the rest of your post on Monday. I am getting ready to leave
for the weekend right now.
But I did find what the VT Evaluation fees were. Here they a
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Mike, everyone,
Steve, by the way, I think an evaluation in that area is a great idea! Would
certainly cover those states which are very far from other possible
evaluations.
I feel the need to seriously address some issues brought up on this email
This message is from: "Mike May, Registrar NFHR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 12:38 AM 8/12/99 -0400, you wrote:
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello list!
I am not attempting to "stir the pot", but I must admit I am very confused
concerning the NFHR evaluation process. I am hoping you all
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello list!
I am not attempting to "stir the pot", but I must admit I am very confused
concerning the NFHR evaluation process. I am hoping you all can enlighten me
a bit. :)
All of us seem to wish more evaluations. We all seem to understand the need
b
This message is from: "Mike May, Registrar NFHR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 10:18 AM 12/3/98 +, you wrote:
>This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Anton Voorhoeve wrote:
>>
>> Mike May told me that the 22 Fjords evaluated by Bob van Bon at our camp
>> in May this year is not acceptable to
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anton Voorhoeve wrote:
>
> Mike May told me that the 22 Fjords evaluated by Bob van Bon at our camp
> in May this year is not acceptable to the NFHR because (1)the evaluation
> was not sanctioned by the NFHR (I didn't know much about it then) and
> (2) th
This message is from: Anton Voorhoeve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mike May told me that the 22 Fjords evaluated by Bob van Bon at our camp
in May this year is not acceptable to the NFHR because (1)the evaluation
was not sanctioned by the NFHR (I didn't know much about it then) and
(2) the evaluation took
This message is from: "Mike May, Registrar NFHR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 08:22 AM 12/2/98 -0800, you wrote:
>I've been following the "yelling and screaming" (if I may) that has
>been going on of late over Evaluations - how to do them, who should
>judge, are they important, etc., etc.It seems t
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (jean gayle)
>This message is from: Mary Thurman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-
>> >There are a number of imported and US and Canadian bred horses
>that have gone
>> >through European Evaluations and have been awarded ster,model,
>prestatie etc.,
>> >s
This message is from: Lori Albrough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mary Thurman wrote:
> I've been following the "yelling and screaming" (if I may) that has
> been going on of late over Evaluations - how to do them, who should
> judge, are they important, etc., etc.It seems to me that if
> Evaluations a
This message is from: Mary Thurman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
> >There are a number of imported and US and Canadian bred horses
that have gone
> >through European Evaluations and have been awarded ster,model,
prestatie etc.,
> >status as well as those who have participated in American
Evaluation
This message is from: Mike May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 08:24 AM 12/2/98 -0500, you wrote:
>This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>There are a number of imported and US and Canadian bred horses that have gone
>through European Evaluations and have been awarded ster,model, prestatie etc.,
>statu
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are a number of imported and US and Canadian bred horses that have gone
through European Evaluations and have been awarded ster,model, prestatie etc.,
status as well as those who have participated in American Evaluations. These
horses shouldn't be ove
This message is from: "Mike May, Registrar NFHR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 09:37 AM 12/1/98 -0600, you wrote:
>This message is from: "Jon A. Ofjord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Hello to all on the list:
>
>
>With all the discussion lately with regards to evaluations, etc. I have
>some questions that mayb
This message is from: "Jon A. Ofjord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello to all on the list:
With all the discussion lately with regards to evaluations, etc. I have
some questions that maybe some of you could answer.
First of all, does anyone know what percentage of our horses that have been
evaluated?
19 matches
Mail list logo
