On Wednesday 08 July 2009 19:45:05 Manish Jain wrote:
==
Part-1)Immediately after a fresh FreeBSD-7.2#RELEASE install :
I assume you will at some stage or the other install a linux port, eg
acroread8 or acroread9, linux-ymessenger, etc.
b. f. wrote:
On 7/6/09, manish jain invalid.poin...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/6 b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com
After running pkgdb -F, I find that there hundreds of ports depending on
python2.5.
Most of these are probably indirectly dependent, and may not be
seriously affected.
2009/7/6 b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com
Manish Jain wrote:
After 3-4 hours, portsnap died on graphics/py-cairo saying :
cannot find python headers
I'm guessing you meant portmaster died here ...
/usr/ports/graphics/py-cairo/work/pycairo-1.8.4/config.log says :
configure:4734: cc -E
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 02:50:35PM +0530, manish jain wrote:
2009/7/6 b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com
After running pkgdb -F, I find that there hundreds of ports depending on
python2.5.
You shouldn't have 2.5 installed at all. It should be upgraded to 2.6 and
changes propagated to all dependent
manish jain wrote:
1) How do I find or set PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION ?
It's defined in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.python.mk -- the default is 'python2.6'
since 2009-06-08. If you want to use a non-default value you can override
the default by adding eg.:
PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION= python2.5
to
On 7/6/09, manish jain invalid.poin...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/6 b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com
After running pkgdb -F, I find that there hundreds of ports depending on
python2.5.
Most of these are probably indirectly dependent, and may not be
seriously affected. Many, for example, may have
Hi,
This is not a portmaster problem, but a problem of getting py-cairo
to build following an update in the ports directory.
3 days back I ran 'portsnap fetch extract'. Then yesterday I ran
'portsnap fetch update' followed immediately by 'portmaster -a -B'
After 3-4 hours, portsnap died
Manish Jain wrote:
After 3-4 hours, portsnap died on graphics/py-cairo saying :
cannot find python headers
I'm guessing you meant portmaster died here ...
/usr/ports/graphics/py-cairo/work/pycairo-1.8.4/config.log says :
configure:4734: cc -E -I/usr/local/include conftest.c
conftest.c:10:28:
Hi,
We had a power lost even though we have ups and generators (still
investigating it) and when the machine rebooted one of the disk seems to be
failed :
The system complains about fsck repaired failed and that I must run it
manually. It then boots in single user mode.
I entered
Hi,
We had a power lost even though we have ups and generators (still
investigating it) and when the machine rebooted one of the disk seems to be
failed :
The system complains about fsck repaired failed and that I must run it
manually. It then boots in single user mode.
I entered gvinum and
Ian Lord wrote:
Hi,
We had a power lost even though we have ups and generators (still
investigating it) and when the machine rebooted one of the disk seems to be
failed :
The system complains about fsck repaired failed and that I must run it
manually. It then boots in single user mode.
Hi,
We had a power lost even though we have ups and generators (still
investigating it) and when the machine rebooted one of the disk seems to
be
failed :
The system complains about fsck repaired failed and that I must run it
manually. It then boots in single user mode.
I entered
-Original Message-
From: B. Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 août 2007 13:54
To: Ian Lord
Subject: Re: Urgent help needed please: pecl-memcache problem after upgrade
of php
Have you tried rebuilding the port?
memcache to reflect your current version of php?
Thats usually what
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 03:01:15 -0400
Ian Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1- Portupgrade broke the thing ?
portupgrade upgraded libraries that were referenced by other objects...for some
reason, pecl / php stuff is very picky. Maybe the ports need to be updated in
unison / force upgrades of the
Hi,
I just did a portupgrade -a and now memcache doesn't work anymore in php.
Here are the version portupgrade installed:
pecl-memcache-2.1.2
memcached-1.2.2
php5-5.2.3_1
In php/error.log I can see this error message
[13-Aug-2007 10:38:20] PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:49:48 -0400
Ian Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I just did a portupgrade -a and now memcache doesn't work anymore in php.
best practice is to test upgrades before applying them to production :)
Here are the version portupgrade installed:
FIXED, ignore this email..
However no one has answered.
Hello Gurus,
This is an Urgent help, as everything pending, waiting.. a FreeBSD
Solution.
and I appologize if I will explain in details, please be patient with
me.
Just yesterday, our ISP installed 2 routers
Hello Gurus,
This is an Urgent help, as everything pending, waiting.. a FreeBSD
Solution.
and I appologize if I will explain in details, please be patient with
me.
Just yesterday, our ISP installed 2 routers (both 3com) at our main
office.
One router acting for Datalink between
Hi,
I had a recent downtime on the mailserver I'm running due to remote location
and trouble with upgrading FreeBSD. I upgraded from 4.7 STABLE to the latest
4.11 with complete make world and new kernel, at first the machine didn't
come back up again due to a disk error, but now it's online
You email didn't state if you rebuilt sendmail too, when you rebuilt
world. This is an option in /etc/make.conf. The current sendmail is
8.13.7 so you may not have rebuilt sendmail.
The logs show that you are not able to authenticate to localhost, but your
email didn't state how you have
Andreas Widerøe Andersen wrote:
Hi,
I had a recent downtime on the mailserver I'm running due to remote
location
and trouble with upgrading FreeBSD. I upgraded from 4.7 STABLE to the
latest
4.11 with complete make world and new kernel, at first the machine didn't
come back up again due to a
Why is the server trying to connect to localhost, anyway? Did
you do special configuration in order to have Sendmail deliver
mail to 127.0.0.1 as part of your (former) configuration with
Spamassassin? If so, did you undo these statements so that Sendmail
would now deliver normally?
Not
Hi,
I am currently in a maintenance window trying to rebuildworld...
I am doing it on a dell poweredge with a built in drac wich emulate a
usb keyboard...
When I need to boot on the drac, I need to use boot with usb keyboard
in the menu...
Now I need to boot in single mode WITH usb
Ian Lord wrote:
Hi,
I am currently in a maintenance window trying to rebuildworld...
I am doing it on a dell poweredge with a built in drac wich emulate a
usb keyboard...
When I need to boot on the drac, I need to use boot with usb keyboard in
the menu...
Now I need to boot in single
Mark Jayson Alvarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Suggestions are welcome... very much welcome. I just need to collate
everything.
Start with security(7).
In future, keep up with Security Advisories.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote:
Now we have a couple of inputs, we just have to figure out which is the proper
combination. Here they are:
1. Use private key for ssh logins (should bring the private key always... and
if it is stolen.)
Private keys can (and should) be passphrase protected.
Good day again!!
This has something to do with my previous email about finding an IRC bouncer
installed into one of our freebsd servers(4.9). Someone suggested here to run a
rootkit finder... I installed an rkhunter and eventually found an ascii text
file inside the /dev/ named saux and to
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 09:51:08PM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Most *((cr/h)ackers* (and I use that term VERY loosely (aka:
script kiddies)) are interested in rooting a box, and setting up a
storage/sharing area that is free to them. This may not be
the case,
but it's better to
[...]
You can easily rebuild a new kernel with:
options IPFIREWALL
options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE
options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT_1000
Then create a script blocking ALL ports exept those what you need.
Especially only allowing SSH access to the box from limited
IP's. If
you
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 10:16:16PM -0700, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
wrote:
I then create one or more jails that use nullfs to READ ONLY mount
specific parts of the master hierarchy into the jail.
This is very interesting to me, as I are currently working on a jail
design and nullfs has a
--On Wednesday, November 16, 2005 20:29:55 -0500 Steve Bertrand
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we have a serious problem. One of our old server
running FreeBSD 4.9 have been compromised and is now
connected to an ircd server..
195.204.1.132.6667 ESTABLISHED
Ran into this recently.
On Nov 17, 2005, at 7:36 AM, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 10:16:16PM -0700, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
wrote:
I then create one or more jails that use nullfs to READ ONLY mount
specific parts of the master hierarchy into the jail.
This is very interesting to me, as I
Good Day!
I think we have a serious problem. One of our old
server running FreeBSD 4.9 have been compromised and
is now connected to an ircd server..
195.204.1.132.6667 ESTABLISHED
However, we still haven't brought the server down in
an attempt to track the intruder down. Right now we
are
Good Day!
I think we have a serious problem. One of our old
server running FreeBSD 4.9 have been compromised and
is now connected to an ircd server..
195.204.1.132.6667 ESTABLISHED
However, we still haven't brought the server down in
an attempt to track the intruder down. Right now we
are
I think we have a serious problem. One of our old server
running FreeBSD 4.9 have been compromised and is now
connected to an ircd server..
195.204.1.132.6667 ESTABLISHED
Ran into this recently. Please post the entire output from:
# top
# w
# last
# ps -aux
# uname -a
...after that,
Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote:
Good Day!
I think we have a serious problem. One of our old
server running FreeBSD 4.9 have been compromised and
is now connected to an ircd server..
195.204.1.132.6667 ESTABLISHED
I believe I'm having the same issue as you, except on FreeBSD
5.4-RELEASE. I
# ls -la /tmp
also /var/tmp
Indeed, many people would install with a /var partition, which would put
/tmp under /var via symlink, but a good point.
if you run awstats or phpBB - upgrade...
Agreed, but even phpBB may not be the fault. Many problems with PHP come
with the binary, not
also /var/tmp
Indeed, many people would install with a /var partition,
which would put /tmp under /var via symlink, but a good point.
My mistake...symlink was the wrong word to use here, for those who
create a /var partition without physically making a /tmp partition.
- top lists nothing significant. 97% idle CPU
Irrelavent, the process is probably idle right now.
- w only shows myself and one other legit user logged in
who is editing config files with vi
Perhaps they aren't currently logged in.
- last shows nothing but myself and that one other user
First, I want to thank you all for replying. For now what I just did is to
just pulled the utp cable from its ethernet port. Now, no one can access it.
However I tried once to put it back and then the ircd connection went up
silently. It is confirmed that we are running psybnc like what
Now what I want to do is to just reinstall the whole
operating system and secure it as possible as I can. Like
someone told, its just a waste to try to track it down
because the intruder might be located somewhere on the other
side of the world.
They are always on the other side of the
On 11/16/05, Mark Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also see a psyBNC server listening on port 7978:
server# sockstat -l4 | grep psybnc
USER COMMANDPID FD PROTO LOCAL ADDRESS FOREIGN ADDRESS
wicked6 psybnc 15819 3 tcp4 *:7978*:*
Funny thing is there
Steve Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now what I want to do is to just reinstall the whole
operating system and secure it as possible as I can. Like
someone told, its just a waste to try to track it down
because the intruder might be located somewhere on the other
side of the world.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 09:51:08PM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Most *((cr/h)ackers* (and I use that term VERY loosely (aka:
script kiddies)) are interested in rooting a box, and setting up a
storage/sharing area that is free to them. This may not be the
case, but it's better to 'observe' your
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 05:16:37PM -0800, Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote:
Good Day!
At first I thought I was confused, but then I realized that you had
cross-posted your message to freebsd-security@ and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please don't do this, as it fragments the
discussion.
Good luck.
--
Steve Bertrand wrote:
- top lists nothing significant. 97% idle CPU
Irrelavent, the process is probably idle right now.
I understand, but I was trying to give you the results of the commands
that you asked Mark Alvarez to run.
- w only shows myself and one other legit user logged in
who is
On Nov 16, 2005, at 9:38 PM, Will Maier wrote:
OP has some asset that is being threatened or diminished by this
attack, be it his bandwith, CPU cycles, host/network integrity or
self confidence. He needs to identify that asset and work quickly to
protect it. In most cases, this will mean
Marco Wertejuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
try sockstat | grep 6667 to see which process is
connecting to irc and try to see what this process
is doing with lsof, but depending on what backdoor
or rootkit is used, it's possible to see nothing
because intelligent rootkits hide themself
Ok done
David Kirchner wrote:
On 11/16/05, Mark Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also see a psyBNC server listening on port 7978:
server# sockstat -l4 | grep psybnc
USER COMMANDPID FD PROTO LOCAL ADDRESS FOREIGN ADDRESS
wicked6 psybnc 15819 3 tcp4 *:7978*:*
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 04:17:38AM -0500, kalin mintchev wrote:
the machine would come up. then netsat or ping or ssh will crash it...
the first time i had to add the sshd user and group...
crash is about as helpful as it's broken!. Are core files
generated? Are there any error messages?
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
upgraded from 4.6 = 4.10 rel
network programs are craching the new system: netstat, ping, the qmail tcp
server all of them...
sshd is running but when accessing from outside it panics too... what is it?
can i turn something off in the kernel?!
--
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
upgraded from 4.6 = 4.10 rel
network programs are craching the new system: netstat, ping, the qmail tcp
server all of them...
sshd is running but when accessing from outside it panics too... what is
it?
can i turn something off in the kernel?!
At 09:35 27.12.2004, you wrote:
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
upgraded from 4.6 = 4.10 rel
network programs are craching the new system: netstat, ping, the qmail tcp
server all of them...
sshd is running but when accessing from outside it panics too... what is
it?
can i turn
kalin mintchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
upgraded from 4.6 = 4.10 rel
network programs are craching the new system: netstat, ping, the qmail tcp
server all of them...
sshd is running but when accessing from outside it panics too... what is it?
can
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thank you Bill for rplying...
well i did it a few times with the same success. it's not the first time
i'm doing it. it's the first time with the 4.x..
i followed the handbook step by step - rebuild devs too.. and then
cleaned up obj.. to make it all again -
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 02:40:34PM +0100, Andreas Wider?e Andersen typed:
At 09:35 27.12.2004, you wrote:
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
upgraded from 4.6 = 4.10 rel
network programs are craching the new system: netstat, ping, the qmail tcp
server all of them...
sshd is
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 02:40:34PM +0100, Andreas Wider?e Andersen
typed:
At 09:35 27.12.2004, you wrote:
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
upgraded from 4.6 = 4.10 rel
network programs are craching the new system: netstat, ping, the
qmail
tcp
Hi,
(freebd 5.2-release)
I'm not able to use for example:
/usr/ports/xyz/someport/
make install
The fetch command fails, and it can not retrieve the sources, I can try any
port all fail?!
=== Vulnerability check disabled
unzip550.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 02:40:33PM +0100, Didier WIROTH wrote:
As we use a proxy for http connections I've also added this to make.conf:
FETCH_ENV=HTTP_PROXY=http://ourproxy:8080
Fetch was also trying to use the proxy for ftp connections?!
Here is the output of my entire make.conf
Dear Sir,
I'm required to run a.out binaries like foxplus
in a recent Intel based hardware. I have chosen
FreeBSD 5.1 and successfuly installed. But I could
not run a.out binaries like Foxplus. I tried it by
load ibcs modules and aout modules in /boot/kernel
directory. My foxplus did not
Hi,
I am trying to install samba on my freeBSD machine and
it says /: write file system full .Looks like the
hard disk is not sufficient.How do I solve this
issue,meaning to uninstall a few things?
thanks
shubha
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, [iso-8859-1] shubha mr wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to install samba on my freeBSD machine and
it says /: write file system full .Looks like the
hard disk is not sufficient.How do I solve this
issue,meaning to uninstall a few things?
depending on the packages you have
or pkg_remove stuff
Good luck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of shubha mr
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 13:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: urgent help
Hi,
I am trying to install samba on my freeBSD machine and
it says /: write
63 matches
Mail list logo
