Re: FVWM: i can't run fvwm 2.4

2002-09-10 Thread Gregg Dameron
John Latham wrote: Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 11:27:37 -0600 From: Gregg Dameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: fvwm@fvwm.org John Latham wrote: I've just noticed that the one I thought might be the most helpful, ResizeHintOverride actually is already there in 2.4 -- for some reason I

Re: FVWM: i can't run fvwm 2.4

2002-09-05 Thread John Latham
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 11:27:37 -0600 From: Gregg Dameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: fvwm@fvwm.org John Latham wrote: I've just noticed that the one I thought might be the most helpful, ResizeHintOverride actually is already there in 2.4 -- for some reason I thought it was only in 2.5. (I

Re: FVWM: i can't run fvwm 2.4

2002-09-03 Thread Bruce M Beach
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Dominik Vogt wrote: Ah. On the FVWM home page it says: Latest Alpha Release: 2.5.3 which I must admit has coloured my thinking a bit. Doh. When the web site is updated the next time it will read very unstable instead of alpha. 1) I am at this point using

Re: FVWM: i can't run fvwm 2.4

2002-09-03 Thread Gregg Dameron
John Latham wrote: I've just noticed that the one I thought might be the most helpful, ResizeHintOverride actually is already there in 2.4 -- for some reason I thought it was only in 2.5. (I am hoping this will help combat the quite common but appalling 1x1, modal, nonresizable dialog

Re: FVWM: i can't run fvwm 2.4

2002-09-02 Thread Bruce M Beach
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Dominik Vogt wrote: Furthermore, *if* you stumble across a problem that is really bad, you may be forced to upgrade to a version that's very unstable. Right now I'm planning to rewrite major parts of the menu loop, the builtin command interface and the main event loop -

Re: FVWM: i can't run fvwm 2.4

2002-09-02 Thread John Latham
From: Dominik Vogt fvwm@fvwm.org Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 11:01:14 +0200 On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 07:13:18PM +0100, John Latham wrote: Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:17:29 +0200 From: Dominik Vogt fvwm@fvwm.org I was building a Red Hat ready fvwm2.5.2 RPM which we are probably

Re: FVWM: i can't run fvwm 2.4

2002-09-02 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 04:46:48PM +0100, John Latham wrote: From: Dominik Vogt fvwm@fvwm.org Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 11:01:14 +0200 On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 07:13:18PM +0100, John Latham wrote: Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:17:29 +0200 From: Dominik Vogt fvwm@fvwm.org I was

Re: FVWM: i can't run fvwm 2.4

2002-08-29 Thread John Latham
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:17:29 +0200 From: Dominik Vogt fvwm@fvwm.org I was building a Red Hat ready fvwm2.5.2 RPM which we are probably going to use here at Manchester CS. Don't do that! It's not even alpha quality. I can't decide whether your are advising using 2.5.3, or 2.4.9

Re: FVWM: i can't run fvwm 2.4

2002-08-24 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 23 Aug 2002 23:32:02 +0200, Imre Vida wrote: This also suggests that the maintainers are aware of (at least some) problems on this front. This is to put it very softly, as John did it earlier a bit naughty against all those stupid users like me. Well, the multibyte support is marked

Re: FVWM: i can't run fvwm 2.4

2002-08-24 Thread Imre Vida
On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 09:14:54AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: On 23 Aug 2002 23:32:02 +0200, Imre Vida wrote: This also suggests that the maintainers are aware of (at least some) problems on this front. This is to put it very softly, as John did it earlier a bit naughty

Re: FVWM: i can't run fvwm 2.4

2002-08-23 Thread szonyi calin
--- Ionel Mugurel Ciobica [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : În data de 21-08-2002, la 11h 06'39, Mikhael Goikhman (migo) scria cãtre fvwm, despre Re: FVWM: i can't run fvwm 2.4: I have the same problem with fvwm 2.4.x. Every time I install a new package with dselect or with apt-get the fvwm

Re: FVWM: i can't run fvwm 2.4

2002-08-23 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 23 Aug 2002 17:14:55 +0200, szonyi calin wrote: 2. I use locale ro_RO.ISO-8859-16. I think the locale for Romania should be ro_RO.ISO-8859-2. Is there any reason for using ro_RO.ISO-8859-16 ? It includes the euro sign and some other small changes AFAIK. I suppose fvwm-2.4.x exits

Re: FVWM: i can't run fvwm 2.4

2002-08-23 Thread Imre Vida
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 06:33:59PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: Is there any reason for using ro_RO.ISO-8859-16 ? It includes the euro sign and some other small changes AFAIK. I suppose fvwm-2.4.x exits when it does not find fixed *-iso8859-16 font. By the way these patches to replace

Re: FVWM: i can't run fvwm 2.4

2002-08-21 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 21 Aug 2002 00:14:21 +0200, Imre Vida wrote: i run my machine under Debian woody. When i tried to switch to fvwm i had problems running fvwm (offical deb package v2.4.8). First i could not get it started with xdm but was still able to launch it from an xterm. Later on, however,

Re: FVWM: i can't run fvwm 2.4

2002-08-21 Thread Ionel Mugurel Ciobica
În data de 21-08-2002, la 11h 06'39, Mikhael Goikhman (migo) scria către fvwm, despre Re: FVWM: i can't run fvwm 2.4: On 21 Aug 2002 00:14:21 +0200, Imre Vida wrote: i run my machine under Debian woody. When i tried to switch to fvwm i had problems running fvwm (offical deb

Re: FVWM: i can't run fvwm 2.4

2002-08-21 Thread John Latham
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 14:25:34 +0200 From: Ionel Mugurel Ciobica [EMAIL PROTECTED] =CEn data de 21-08-2002, la 11h 06'39, Mikhael Goikhman (migo) scria c=E3= tre fvwm, despre Re: FVWM: i can't run fvwm 2.4: On 21 Aug 2002 00:14:21 +0200, Imre Vida wrote: =20 i run my machine under

FVWM: i can't run fvwm 2.4

2002-08-20 Thread Imre Vida
Hi, i run my machine under Debian woody. When i tried to switch to fvwm i had problems running fvwm (offical deb package v2.4.8). First i could not get it started with xdm but was still able to launch it from an xterm. Later on, however, i was not able to launch it at all what ever i